Recent posts

#21

Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: Free Agent Acquisition

Last post by VictorRomano - Today at 05:36:11 PM

Any of the top-10 OL, but I'd take Yoshi back from the Riders, Revenburg out of Hamilton, or Boxton out of BC.  Grab another interior DL (Mauldin IV?) and maybe a run at Katsantonis as safety.  Lots of decent WRs up for grabs as well - flip on of them Mitchell's money.

#22

Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: Free Agent Acquisition

Last post by RebusRankin - Today at 05:20:58 PM

AJ Allen

#23

Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: New rules / commissioner's...

Last post by ModAdmin - Today at 05:13:26 PM

If they are arguing faulty logic it does.

If they're comparing the NFL to the CFL and concluding that shorter fields equal less scoring then they're wrong on that point as I've outlined.

People who are wrong can be called wrong. Feel free to argue the logic the poster has presented as correct if you like. That's what a discussion is.

Except that not a single down has been played yet under the new CFL rules/arrangements. 

#24

Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Free Agent Acquisition

Last post by Blue In BC - Today at 04:49:01 PM

It's early but what player would we most likely try to attract from another team if he reaches free agency?

#25

Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-seas...

Last post by Ridermania - Today at 04:39:09 PM

Just trying to keep up on all the comments during the off season.

I know Brady won't be coming over to the Riders.

Honestly hope him and Demski stay with the Bombers. 

#26

Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: New rules / commissioner's...

Last post by Sir Blue and Gold - Today at 04:23:29 PM

People have varying opinions on this and they are entitled to those opinions.  You may disagree but that doesn't change anything and it certainly doesn't make you "right" and others "wrong". 

If they are arguing faulty logic it does.

If they're comparing the NFL to the CFL and concluding that shorter fields equal less scoring then they're wrong on that point as I've outlined.

People who are wrong can be called wrong. Feel free to argue the logic the poster has presented as correct if you like. That's what a discussion is.

#27

Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: New rules / commissioner's...

Last post by ModAdmin - Today at 04:14:15 PM

Soccer wants to increase scoring. They compare hockey and basketball and come to the conclusion that smaller nets mean more points. They recommend shrinking the net size. Nonsense.

Someone wants to argue that shorter fields mean less points are scored. They compare NFL to CFL and deduce longer fields score more TDs. They recommend playing on a 200 yard field. Nonsense.

These "arguments" are all hilarious and wrong. But since the pitchforks are out who cares, ya?

People have varying opinions on this and they are entitled to those opinions.  You may disagree but that doesn't change anything and it certainly doesn't make you "right" and others "wrong". 

#28

Offside Forum / Re: Winnipeg Jets Discussion -...

Last post by Pigskin - Today at 03:55:25 PM

Jets in Edmonton tonight. I would think Milic will start.

#29

Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: 1st & 10 | The Blue Bomber...

Last post by Blue In BC - Today at 03:52:14 PM

Jumping ship trying to land on a championship team is a huge gamble, chances are he chooses wrong and ends up on a team that misses the playoffs.  Realistically his best chance is with the club that took him to the GC 5 times.

Sure. I think if he leaves he leaves for money and I'm fine with that. Losing top players for money is the nature of sport. Teams always have to make tough decisions across the roster in SMS spending.

There may be some other top Canadian players available on OL or receiver for example. We may decide to make an offer in the tampering window. That's more difficult to do if you are " holding back " SMS for another player that may choose to leave.

It's not like any team can make 1 or 2 offers @ $275K-$300K while in limbo on their own free agents.  A team must essentially know what money is available to make bigger bids in that time frame.

#30

Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: 1st & 10 | The Complete Bl...

Last post by Throw Long Bannatyne - Today at 03:51:37 PM

We can all agree that Zach did not perform exceptionally well in 2025.  But too many people are putting it all on Zach.  He had a new OC who seemed to struggle and could be replaced in 2026, and a weaker Oline that will require upgrades and who were responsible for protecting Zach who was under pressure most of the year.  He also had receivers who also struggled this past season.

Just to say it was not all on Zach.  He deserves another year with some necessary upgrades before deciding he should take a reduced role or be traded.

Certainly other factors involved, but in most games last season he couldn't take advantage of clear opportunities when they presented themselves, receivers would get open and too often he would under-throw them or throw interceptions.  He's been doing the same for over 2 years now, which matches how long the offence has been under-performing.  This season they blamed it on Hogan, the season before Buck.  What miracle is going to save him?