Recent posts

#21

Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: New rules / commissioner's...

Last post by wpg#1 - Today at 02:22:55 PM

I propose they hang an effigy of Stewart Johnston strung high between their goal posts and the kicker gets an extra point for nailing it.

NOW THAT'S FUNNY !

#22

Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: New rules / commissioner's...

Last post by Sir Blue and Gold - Today at 01:48:08 PM

Why not just ignore what others are discussing as it relates to the topic of changes? Ya know, instead of getting triggered and lashing out at strangers on a forum.

It's pretty hilarious for you to label anyone else's schtick on here as tiresome. Your bootlicker routine was tiresome two months ago when the changes were first announced.

Maybe you should to take a break from this place for a while. Your unhinged rants are rude, childish, and add zero value to the discussion. Your behaviour on here has become utterly insufferable. You've spent literal months defending rich bozos.

You're the ones who seem triggered. I'm just telling you how it is.

Far be it from me to tell you how to spend your time but the 10 of you patting each other on the back for things like booing the commissioner and telling yourselves how correct you are is a total waste of time.  It was an interesting debate at first. But they decision seems made, yes? Time to move on.

#23

Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: New rules / commissioner's...

Last post by blue_gold_84 - Today at 01:42:16 PM

Here's the cold hard truth:

[proceeds to post a bunch of useless, condescending gibberish that's actually not truth at all - it's just an opinion, and a pretty bitter one at that]

Why not just ignore what others are discussing as it relates to the topic of changes? Ya know, instead of getting triggered and lashing out at strangers on a forum.

It's pretty hilarious for you to label anyone else's schtick on here as tiresome. Your bootlicker routine was tiresome two months ago when the changes were first announced.

Maybe you should to take a break from this place for a while. Your unhinged rants are rude, childish, and add zero value to the discussion. Your behaviour on here has become utterly insufferable. You've spent literal months defending rich bozos.

#24

Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: New rules / commissioner's...

Last post by Sir Blue and Gold - Today at 01:38:13 PM

.

Here's the cold hard truth:

The CFL does owe it's diehard fans, who repeatedly purchase tickets, and merchandise a say in the new changes. You're "if you don't like the changes, not only are you wrong, nobody cares about your opinion, nobody cares about you, etc" is an example of a 12 year old child that continuously adds nothing to the conversation, but to personally attack and try to dehumanise the fan base.

Maybe grow up, and stop acting like a petulant 12 year old boy.

Let's review:

The CFL is a business. You are a customer. You've spent literal months whining about the changes on a forum they provide you for free. They've heard YOUR complaints. They've listened. They just don't agree with you or think they're valid enough to course correct. Thems the breaks.

Are you guys really going to spend the entire off season complaining about how the clock starts counting down and then the entire next year's off-season on the goal posts? But I'm "the child?"

One again the brass tax: be a customer or don't. It's pretty simple.

#25

Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-seas...

Last post by blue_gold_84 - Today at 01:25:48 PM

Well, that just made Hogan's job at least 50% safer...

I'm hoping this means Condell is the next OC.

#26

Offside Forum / Re: 2025 NFL season

Last post by blue_gold_84 - Today at 01:20:19 PM

The Giants season summed up in one play.

#27

Offside Forum / Re: Winnipeg Jets Discussion -...

Last post by blue_gold_84 - Today at 01:13:46 PM

What a hideous game. I was done after the Sabres went up 3-0 in the first.

This organization gambled on a few aging vets and that's failed. But even the depth on this team... What happened? Nobody's stepping up and they all look like passengers the last several weeks.

And even with Hellebuyck active, they weren't succeeding.

I think this team is cooked.

Might as well call up some prospects from the Moose and give them a taste of the big leagues. It isn't like they could do any worse.

#28

Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: Blue Bombers add quarterba...

Last post by Jesse - Today at 11:50:15 AM

Darn, that may delay his arrival another 6 months.

Not unless they sign him.

We're waiting until February when "futures contracts" can be offered. That's where he'll learn if he has a training camp invite anywhere. That might delay him.

If February comes and goes and he's left standing, then we probably get him in to TC.

#29

Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: Bluebomber OC position dis...

Last post by M.O.A.B. - Today at 11:47:46 AM

As long as it's not Hogan, I am OK.

Condell, Jackson or LaPolice. Heck, I will welcome back Harris.

#30

Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: 1st & 10 | The Blue Bomber...

Last post by Jesse - Today at 11:01:00 AM

I am not sure Hamilton had the worst run D. I was pretty sure BC was the worst at 139 per game. Could be wrong. But, the point was Fox had 26 DTs. Woods, Adams, JT, 28 DTs, 2 QS. Fox might have been a better choice then Woods, or Adams last season. It probably came down to a few dollars. The Bombers might want to try and keep Woods instead of the revolving door at DT. We develop these player and then just let them go. 

And if Woods player every game and we play with a 4 DL set most of the time, he'd have more tackles too. He wouldn't necessarily have played better...just more.

Tackles are a poor indicator of success is what I'm saying.