Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on Today at 04:23:29 PMIf they are arguing faulty logic it does.
If they're comparing the NFL to the CFL and concluding that shorter fields equal less scoring then they're wrong on that point as I've outlined.
People who are wrong can be called wrong. Feel free to argue the logic the poster has presented as correct if you like. That's what a discussion is.
Quote from: ModAdmin on Today at 04:14:15 PMPeople have varying opinions on this and they are entitled to those opinions. You may disagree but that doesn't change anything and it certainly doesn't make you "right" and others "wrong".
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on Today at 03:49:45 PMSoccer wants to increase scoring. They compare hockey and basketball and come to the conclusion that smaller nets mean more points. They recommend shrinking the net size. Nonsense.
Someone wants to argue that shorter fields mean less points are scored. They compare NFL to CFL and deduce longer fields score more TDs. They recommend playing on a 200 yard field. Nonsense.
These "arguments" are all hilarious and wrong. But since the pitchforks are out who cares, ya?
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on Today at 03:35:58 PMJumping ship trying to land on a championship team is a huge gamble, chances are he chooses wrong and ends up on a team that misses the playoffs. Realistically his best chance is with the club that took him to the GC 5 times.
Quote from: ModAdmin on Today at 05:40:48 AMWe can all agree that Zach did not perform exceptionally well in 2025. But too many people are putting it all on Zach. He had a new OC who seemed to struggle and could be replaced in 2026, and a weaker Oline that will require upgrades and who were responsible for protecting Zach who was under pressure most of the year. He also had receivers who also struggled this past season.
Just to say it was not all on Zach. He deserves another year with some necessary upgrades before deciding he should take a reduced role or be traded.