Main Menu

Recent posts

#21
Offside Forum / Re: Winnipeg Jets Discussion -...
Last post by Pigskin - March 01, 2026, 11:16:46 PM
Helle giving up a soft one in OT.
#22
I tell ya, the marketing department is missing a gold mine in the O'Shea-style pre-frayed brim Championship Replica Hat.
#23
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on March 01, 2026, 06:45:48 PMWell, Elgersma's NFL combine experience is done. He wasn't invited to test on anything but he did throw passes to receivers at a few points.

Can't imagine that will be exciting to most teams but I guess we'll find out.

That sounds like an early exit. Do we know if he's reporting to his UFL team now? He was reported as listed on a roster but nothing showing he'd actually plan to attend TC etc.
#24
Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: Kicking Showcase
Last post by Blue In BC - March 01, 2026, 07:46:45 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on March 01, 2026, 06:55:34 PMWhy is it an "either/or" grow the product domestically/globally?  Why can't it be both, and even synergistic, growing it at home BY growing it abroad (we do have a lot of "New Canadians".  If only cricket produced candidates like Aussie Rules does.  I guess, soccer?

As to broadcast, while TSN is the lifeblood of the game, we all know that streaming is the key to the future, and does not require broadcast infrastructure to reach any corner of the globe. 

The global initiative is not a home run, but it is also not a total bust.  The cost has been minimal, and we have had exposure.  And found players.  Hansen was exciting, and even created an issue with being worth more than the Global capped salary. Which is great.  And its not like he's the only one, Maltos will be bringing in a good paycheck next year.

And even discussing the Global initiative, on either side, is accomplishing the goal of improving engagement.

It's not whether expanding the global market is a good idea or not. My issue is that adding a 9 ( min ) to a max of 18 to CFL rosters won't succeed in that effort. I don't think fans in any country watch games in order to see the kicking game which is where the globals land on rosters.

The discussion we're having is in Canada. Any proof anybody in Europe is discussing this issue? Are there any games being broadcast?
#25
Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: Kicking Showcase
Last post by theaardvark - March 01, 2026, 06:55:34 PM
Why is it an "either/or" grow the product domestically/globally?  Why can't it be both, and even synergistic, growing it at home BY growing it abroad (we do have a lot of "New Canadians".  If only cricket produced candidates like Aussie Rules does.  I guess, soccer?

As to broadcast, while TSN is the lifeblood of the game, we all know that streaming is the key to the future, and does not require broadcast infrastructure to reach any corner of the globe. 

The global initiative is not a home run, but it is also not a total bust.  The cost has been minimal, and we have had exposure.  And found players.  Hansen was exciting, and even created an issue with being worth more than the Global capped salary. Which is great.  And its not like he's the only one, Maltos will be bringing in a good paycheck next year.

And even discussing the Global initiative, on either side, is accomplishing the goal of improving engagement.
#26
Well, Elgersma's NFL combine experience is done. He wasn't invited to test on anything but he did throw passes to receivers at a few points.

Can't imagine that will be exciting to most teams but I guess we'll find out.
#28
Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: Kicking Showcase
Last post by Blue In BC - March 01, 2026, 03:15:07 PM
Quote from: dd on March 01, 2026, 02:58:38 PMThe ratio is the fundamental principle to the league and it isn't going anywhere, nor should it. Couldn't give a rip if the game is more popular in the states, fact is, it never will be, and that's fine by me

That supports the argument that there is little or no value in the global program. On that aspect I agree. The global aspect of the ratio essentially replaces most Canadian kickers or punters. 

I can't dispute that the ratio is fundamental principle. However, I'm old enough to remember roster size in the low 30's and imports playing both ways. That meant less Canadians seeing the field.

In that era there were no DI's on rosters. A backup QB probably was a DB returner

It depends on your definition of ratio and where you want to draw the line. Global players are a recent subset of ratio. What's next on how they modify ratio away from Canadians.

Anyway. Back to the topic of kicking showcase. There is a good chance one of these candidates ends up on our PR after the 2026 draft.



#29
Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: Kicking Showcase
Last post by dd - March 01, 2026, 02:58:38 PM
The ratio is the fundamental principle to the league and it isn't going anywhere, nor should it. Couldn't give a rip if the game is more popular in the states, fact is, it never will be, and that's fine by me
#30
Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: Kicking Showcase
Last post by Blue In BC - March 01, 2026, 02:01:45 PM
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on March 01, 2026, 01:33:17 PMOr they could do both. Perhaps that's some of the rationale behind smaller fields that fit the footprint of more stadiums?

They should be trying to grow the game in Canada.

Tney should be trying to grow the game globally.

Suggesting you ignore "the world" and go after Saskatoon and Brandon doesn't play well in the board room. Go ahead and suggest that and see what happens.

The CFL already plays a game outside of the normal cities once a season. That could be expanded. Because of the world cup, the Lions and Argos will be doing that to start the season.

A variant of that would be more focus on holding training camps in new cities

I disagree with the global concept outright.

Aside from Hansen can anybody name a global player that is not from Australia or Mexico?

The CFL can't even get a 10th team off the ground. So don't give me that globalization is a great idea. Success starts at home.

I'm not in favour of the ratio either and have said that often over the years.

I'd go so far as suggesting with no ratio and more American players we'd see more interest in the USA. That would lead to broadcast revenue as an outcome. It would lead to the CFL being a higher profile for players.