

Quote from: Blue In BC on March 08, 2026, 09:32:22 PMNot correct at any level. WOW. Talk about theories? Money PAID IN 2025 is against the 2025 SMS. If it wasn't then the SMS has no meaning and defies how it's calculated.
Quote from: gobombersgo on March 08, 2026, 08:36:45 PMI dont think thats the case at all.
Teams that are losing money will look to trim their budgets in areas other than the SMS.
Quote from: TBURGESS on March 08, 2026, 08:19:00 PMThere you go stating your opinion as a fact when it's not. Just because the contract was signed in 2025 doesn't mean the money comes from 2025 money. Ask Milt, who got paid at least one year (it might have been more) after he retired due to the way his contract was set up.
It's reasonable to believe that remaining SMS money would be used before 2026 money, but that's not the same as what you're saying.
Bonuses paid in 2025 could be from the 2025 or 2026 SMS. Money paid in 2026 could be in any SMS going forward, but not in the 2025 or before SMS. The same goes for salaries, but quite frankly, I can't see any reason that a player would get a salary other than bonuses paid out before the end of the year.
You keep bringing up going over the SMS as if it's some 'gotcha.' It's not. If any team went over the SMS, it's because they either chose to or were forced to because of injury replacements. It has nothing to do with the number of remaining 2025 SMS $.
![]()
Quote from: theaardvark on March 08, 2026, 07:31:55 PMWinnipeg an deal with $SMS different than most teams, because we make money, it's just $$$. Some teams actually want to stay under for budgetary reasons...
Not saying that any team is going to spend to the $SMS basement, but here $$$ are not an issue beyond the cap we have to stay under.