Quote from: blue_or_die on October 15, 2025, 01:44:37 PMI'm as down as anyone right now after Saturday's game, but I'm not sure everyone remembers 2019 all that well. I think a lot of people (I'm guilty as well) kinda remember it either as the season where we won it all and broke the draught or where we were essentially total losers and then scrapped it out after squeaking into the playoffs to win 3 games in a row on the road.
The reality was more complicated (like everything in life). It ended up being a roller coaster of a season, which was not the expectation as we were coming off 3 consecutive years of playoffs finishing: WSF L @BC (2016); WSF L vEDM (2017) and WF L @CGY (2018) and were expecting the take the next step and get to the Grey Cup game. What actually materialized was a total rollercoaster with huge promise and tons of disappointment mixed in. We went
5-0
4-4
1-3
giving us a 10-7 record going into the last game. That record is fine, but look at the trend from the start to the middle to the end. Not good for a team looking to peak and break a 29 year draught. It looked like we were about to regress from the previous years and certainly not take the next step.
This year was the emergence of Strev who came in multiple times for injured Matt Nichols with some ability (although not near starter level) plus astonishing athleticism and heart. Then we signed some injury prone wash up named Zach Collaros and decided to give him the start in our last game of the season at home against Calgary. I don't need to tell you what happened after that.
Guess my point is, even though I'm pretty worked up about the Edmonton game still, there is precedent to turn it on (as we have done this year, just not consistently) and get into the playoffs and then not look back.
Definitely the glass half full outlook but I do think it's more than just a hope and prayer at this point. We need Zach to be good Zach and not the version on Saturday who throws 5 yards too short or 5 yards too long and honestly, that might be enough to make the difference. Even though I don't think we are a super great team, I'm not blown away by Sask or anyone else. They all look - and are - very beatable. It's just up to us to pull ourselves together and play the way I know we can.
Quote from: wpg#1 on October 15, 2025, 03:54:48 PMCompletely off topic, sort of .. but is it just me or does Mace look like he's standing falling asleep on the sidelines?
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on October 15, 2025, 04:54:41 PMDisagree no need to shop for a LT in FA, Vanterpool, Lofton and Randolph were no worse than Stan has been at LT in the few games they played. They have 4 imports fighting for 2 jobs hopefully they hang onto 3, the deciding factor should be age and salary when the talent difference is not significant. Love Stan but I'm seeking a full flush of vets past their prime.
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on October 14, 2025, 05:16:18 PMDixon and Dooley sounds like
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on October 15, 2025, 11:50:12 PMAnd if the league thinks these changes will help and will lead to a stronger league, isn't that the main thing?
QuoteTo put it bluntly, most of you are no more qualified to make that decision than you are to teach fencing
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on October 15, 2025, 03:57:20 PMWhy don't you want to shorten the field? Is it simply because the NFL uses a 100 yard field and NFL = bad?
Shorter fields should translate to more aggressive defenses which should result in more exciting football.
Moving the field goal posts back, similarly, requires offenses to be more aggressive because field goal range isn't the 50. It's now the 40 or 35.
Most of these changes fans haven't even thought through. They just don't like it because they don't like it.