Quote from: theaardvark on March 09, 2026, 02:29:48 PMLooks like getting rid of that dead wood Stanley" has really sparked the team...
Just kidding. Any time you can replace Stanley on the top PP with Morrissey, its going to have benefit.
We're getting healthy at the right time, if we were in contention. Now its just lottery busting that we're doing.
Tanks alot.
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on March 08, 2026, 07:13:08 PMIt'll be interesting to see if the Bombers go 3 Natl. receivers like the Riders did, can't really see it as it would limit the dynamic of the passing game. Would honestly prefer to see Nield and Clercius job share, only on the field at the same time when it's a running play, which could spare Demski extra wear and tear he doesn't need to accumulate.by going three nationals, allows us to have oline with 3 imports. A stronger oline increases the dynamics of the passing game much more than the 4th best receiver being a cdn vs import. The quality of the receivers doesn't mean a whole lot if the qb is continually running for his life.
Quote from: Pigskin on March 03, 2026, 11:14:17 PMWhat's the base salary for a QB in the USFL.
Quote from: Blue In BC on March 09, 2026, 02:14:26 PMI didn't say anything close to that. I said we'd use as much as we could by the end of the calendar year. Any bonus paid before 12/31 was 2025 SMS and any bonus paid on or after Jan 1 was 2026 SMS.To be clear. The fact that contracts were announced in 2025 doesn't mean that they are using any 2025 SMS.
The guide would be the date of the cheque even if that meant exceeding the 2025 SMS by some amount.
Quote from: TBURGESS on March 09, 2026, 01:21:54 PMYou're saying that we would have to have enough 2025 SMS room for every bonus you paid out before the end of the year. You also say that we use up the 2025 SMS before using the 2026 SMS (which I believe is true). Are you suggesting that some, most, or all of the bonuses paid after we drained the 2025 SMS are actually paid in January so they are included in the 2026 SMS? If so, then the date on the contract really doesn't matter.
Quote from: Blue In BC on March 08, 2026, 09:32:22 PMNot correct at any level. WOW. Talk about theories? Money PAID IN 2025 is against the 2025 SMS. If it wasn't then the SMS has no meaning and defies how it's calculated.You're saying that we would have to have enough 2025 SMS room for every bonus you paid out before the end of the year. You also say that we use up the 2025 SMS before using the 2026 SMS (which I believe is true). Are you suggesting that some, most, or all of the bonuses paid after we drained the 2025 SMS are actually paid in January so they are included in the 2026 SMS? If so, then the date on the contract really doesn't matter.