Main Menu

Recent posts

#1
Quote from: Waffler on Today at 08:30:15 PMAfraid to jinx it. I'll answer the poll on Sunday, hehe.
Yeah fair enough, I don't believe in jinx but I won't spook others juju either and I respect your decision, maybe we need Zach dolls but not a voodo one, therapy ones that we subject all Brady's modalities LOL Ok wait we poke him but they are acupuncture needles LOL

All that said anyone that votes on Sunday gets less poll points LOL, early birds get bonus marks ;)

This is like what Neil says don't spook the horse ;)
#2
Afraid to jinx it. I'll answer the poll on Sunday, hehe.
#3
Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: Trade Brady?
Last post by Blueforlife - Today at 08:27:27 PM
hard stop no to less Cdn starters, hard stop no to less Cdns total

It's the CFL, don't take away (C) or make it a little c

Canadian players make the league what it is.  It's special, it's unique, it's local and it's all about the community. The league has a lot of work to do but this is one thing I would never change

I feel a discussion about Canadian players, ratio etc. should be in another thread, this is a Brady thread.
#4
ONE MORE TIME ONE MORE TIME
#5
Quote from: Blueforlife on October 04, 2026, 01:46:03 PMEdmonton
BC
Calgary
Montreal
GUESS WHO'S BACK? ZACH IS BACK, ZACH IS BACK, ZACH IS BACK

gotta change it to WPG from CGY, let's go bombers

Edmonton
BC
DA BOMBERS!!!!!!
Montreal
#6
Zach appears to be in the right head space.  I think as long as the OL can protect and Brady can cook we have a chance here.

He didn't like the question about people worrying about his health or the process to get cleared.  I get the media trying but I think they pushed a little too hard. 

It will be a sad day when 1. He is no longer a Bomber and 2. When he retires.  Not quiet a generational talent but his leadership, ability to extend plays (earlier in his career), deep ball (few years ago) and touch (still has it) is pretty elite.  He will be missed when he is gone.

He says he wants to keep playing.
#7
Quote from: Waffler on Today at 06:19:26 PMQB is the one place you have to overpay unless you have developed a guy in your own system.

I see the next 6 Grey Cups: 2 for Rourke, 2 for Alexander and 2 for Kelly (provided he doesn't waste his career in Ottawa). I see zero for anyone else. That's why I would over pay and be happy.

I recall Cal Murphy over paying for Dunigan. No cups but we were in the mix every year and arguably should have won one.
Yes but this has the potential to be one of the biggest contracts ever in the CFL, while it could pay off, it just feels too hot to handle but we shall see.  It's going to be hard to beat Alexander and Rourke in their prime yes.  Kelly I like b/c he has gun but I can't support bringing him here b/c of the off field issues.  I want to win but I would pass, mostly b/c of the price.

Bo could get one more cup.

I would over spend on an OL before Kelly.
#8
Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: Trade Brady?
Last post by Blue In BC - Today at 07:32:22 PM
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on Today at 03:38:05 PMIt would be a start.

I think item 2 and 3 would not get passed but the league tries every new CBA. Item 1 would eliminate the global spot per se. That in itself would create potential problems. I'd modify the ratio to add 2 more DI's that would allow for import or global kickers counted as imports.

You'd have to expand more of your thoughts regarding items 2 & 3. Having a minimum number of Canadians is one issue but what does that mean regarding imports as part of the roster?

As I suggested I could see adding 2 more DI's by just calling globals as part of the import part of the roster. If a team actually has 1 or both kickers that are Canadians, then that team just has 2 more DI's in rotation.

I'm not opposed to reducing the number of Canadian starters but I'm also ok if it stays the same. If the number of Canadians overall is reduced then that screws up the development on the depth chart.

So it's complicated.