Global Draft

Started by Blue In BC, April 29, 2026, 02:30:32 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Blue In BC

Quote from: gobombersgo on April 30, 2026, 07:40:54 PMBut, like Stats Junkie pointed out, these 2 players would be eligible to be a last minute replacement on game day.


We already had that ability previously but off the PR as late additions.
Rise to the top

gobombersgo

Quote from: Blue In BC on April 30, 2026, 08:00:01 PMWe already had that ability previously but off the PR as late additions.

Yup, but it could be argued that these 2 spots would be filled by more game ready, veteran players than what you would find on the PR.

Blue In BC

Quote from: gobombersgo on April 30, 2026, 08:11:48 PMYup, but it could be argued that these 2 spots would be filled by more game ready, veteran players than what you would find on the PR.

That's an even worse resolution. Parking 2 vets that are earning a higher than ELC to NOT DRESS but get paid.
Rise to the top

gobombersgo

Quote from: Blue In BC on April 30, 2026, 09:09:25 PMThat's an even worse resolution. Parking 2 vets that are earning a higher than ELC to NOT DRESS but get paid.
Worse option than what?

Currently they would be on the 1 game injured list and wouldnt be eligible to be a last minute game replacement.

IMO this is just adding transparency to the rosters and is a favorable option for players and the teams.

Reserve lists isn't a new concept. The CFL for the longest time had a 4 man reserve list.

Blue In BC

#34
Quote from: gobombersgo on April 30, 2026, 09:18:02 PMWorse option than what?

Currently they would be on the 1 game injured list and wouldnt be eligible to be a last minute game replacement.

IMO this is just adding transparency to the rosters and is a favorable option for players and the teams.

Reserve lists isn't a new concept. The CFL for the longest time had a 4 man reserve list.

Worse than 2 rookies on ELC deals. It's not a resolution, it's a band aid evasion and bad business solution IMO.

Normally ( except last year ) teams don't park veterans on 1 game IR for extended periods unless they are really injured. . Veterans play and when injured are replaced by mostly rookies off the PR.  This plan parks healthy players and that makes zero sense.

Again, the issue is paying players to not play ( vets in particular ). Increase the roster by 2 would be better. Add 1 Canadian and 1 more DI. If adding another DI is an issue than add 2 Canadians.
Rise to the top