Cfl draft

Started by Pete, March 14, 2026, 02:52:55 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Tecno

Quote from: Pigskin on March 15, 2026, 05:48:19 PM3 Down, has the Bombers taking (DB) Jett ELad 6'0"202 with our 1st pick. (TE) Ruban Jones 6'3" 242 with our 2nd. pick, and (WR) Nate Demontagnac 6'3" 195 with 3rd pick. Can't see it. I think we need to go OL/DL first.

No way we should take a TE with our 2nd.  Maybe our "freebie" 2.5nd pick.  I agree 3down appears to just be throwing darts.
Never go full Johnston!

Sir Blue and Gold

CFL has tight end skillsets they just don't call them that.

Ajou Ajou is kind of that body/player type in Saskatchewan.

We often bring our 5th receiver into the formation (Clercius) and when we do so you could call him a tight end for all intents and purposes.

The difference between the CFL and the American game is we also tend to scheme those players to the field also because we have more spread looks.

But the body type and skillset is required even if our "tight ends" tend to be a little lighter and a little more hybrid because we require them to be more versatile.

Don't think of him like drafting a tight end, think of him as an option to upgrade Clercius because that's what it would be in reality 

Tecno

Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on March 24, 2026, 12:19:36 AMDon't think of him like drafting a tight end, think of him as an option to upgrade Clercius because that's what it would be in reality

I'm not sold.  Ajou is touted as a REC.  If he does TE stuff, great.  He's still a REC.  He's not a Mike Miller or Chris-Ike who is 99.9% blocking and 0.1% catching.  (Ike had his first and only pass attempt this last season.)

And we have Ike right now, why do we need to waste a high DP on the next guy??  Heck, just look at what round we got Ike in.  Bet it wasn't 1-2 ("fake/extra" round 2 doesn't count).  And Ajou... what round was he?  Not 1-2.  There's your answer.

I don't mind wasting a 4thRDP on a TE (or next Ajou... whatever) to see if we can upgrade Ike (blocking wasn't great in '25...).  But 2nd?  Crazy talk.
Never go full Johnston!

Sir Blue and Gold

#33
Shrug. If Ruban Jones makes a CFL roster he'll be listed a receiver also because that's what he translate to in the Canadian game.

He'd be brought in closer to the box to run block and he'd be flexed out to the field in spread looks.

You can call that role whatever you want. It simply is what it is. I have no idea where he'd be picked in the draft and neither do you. The CFL draft has never been predictable by anyone really.

Blue In BC

Quote from: Tecno on March 23, 2026, 11:45:20 PMNo way we should take a TE with our 2nd.  Maybe our "freebie" 2.5nd pick.  I agree 3down appears to just be throwing darts.


TE is just a title. I don't know which team will draft him or when. He might become more of a FB type that sees a few passes thrown his way.

He doesn't sound like a player that would be a very high pick in the draft.

BTW. I don't agree our 2nd round bonus pick is a " freebie " that can not be used wisely.  Pick the best player available. If that turns out to be Jones, then so be it.
Rise to the top

Throw Long Bannatyne

Quote from: Blue In BC on March 24, 2026, 02:24:53 PMTE is just a title. I don't know which team will draft him or when. He might become more of a FB type that sees a few passes thrown his way.

He doesn't sound like a player that would be a very high pick in the draft.

BTW. I don't agree our 2nd round bonus pick is a " freebie " that can not be used wisely.  Pick the best player available. If that turns out to be Jones, then so be it.

Closest thing the CFL had to a TE in recent decades was Nik Lewis and he retired in 2017. CFL stats page shows only his last 2 seasons with the Als, no indication he ever played for the Stamps.

Blue In BC

Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on March 24, 2026, 04:00:14 PMClosest thing the CFL had to a TE in recent decades was Nik Lewis and he retired in 2017. CFL stats page shows only his last 2 seasons with the Als, no indication he ever played for the Stamps.

Lewis was a top receiver but he could block extremely well as a SB. I have no idea what Jones's skill set might be but that is the type of role he'd have to fill. At 242 lbs he's not going to be a speed demon. He'd have to be a physical monster against small DB's etc.
Rise to the top

Pigskin

Quote from: Blue In BC on March 24, 2026, 04:44:02 PMLewis was a top receiver but he could block extremely well as a SB. I have no idea what Jones's skill set might be but that is the type of role he'd have to fill. At 242 lbs he's not going to be a speed demon. He'd have to be a physical monster against small DB's etc.

Jones: 4.72/40, and 25 reps on the bench press. If he can pickup the blocking quickly he be a weapon.

 
Don't go through life looking in the rearview mirror.

Blue In BC

Quote from: Pigskin on March 24, 2026, 09:38:56 PMJones: 4.72/40, and 25 reps on the bench press. If he can pickup the blocking quickly he be a weapon.

 

Either way I'm not sure he'll be a high draft pick by any team. He probably gets drafted but maybe 4th or 5th round if he draws interest?
Rise to the top

Blue In BC

#39
Redblacks are willing to trade the # 1 pick in the draft. It would be nice to have but I can't imagine what we'd have to give up to make it a good idea.

That said, I would at least like to have that discussion with them. Trading up from # 4 to # 1 could be part of some sort of package. Might even add in the bonus pick in the 2nd round for example, neg list or a back up player.

I don't know whether we have a player we'd really want in order to get the # 1 pick. Drafting at # 4 is not a bad option either.

I'll be somewhat surprised if they pull off a trade but you never know.

As I've suggested earlier, we don't seem to have a bunch of Canadians we want to move off the team.  So roster spots for newbies are limited. I see a quality over volume in 2026 so trading draft choices after the 2nd round could be an advantage.

Example: If we start an import at LG then Wallace is bumped to 6 OL. Not the worst situation. However, depending on what they see as upside to Vibert, does that make Wallace available in trade.  So drafting an OL with the 1st pick, that is younger, less expensive and has " more upside " in the future, might make sense. In return Ottawa gets an OL that could start today.

I'm not sure about the current projected starting OL in Ottawa. Are they able to draft an OL at # 1 that can start immediately or nearly immediately? IDK.

Note: I'm not proposing we make this trade per se, just speculating on both starting rosters and quality of the top draft choices.  One possible benefit of trading a veteran ( like Wallace ) is an SMS advantage.
Rise to the top