2025 Free Agency (Blue Bomber Signings/News)

Started by ModAdmin, February 09, 2025, 06:52:58 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

blue_gold_84

Quote from: TecnoGenius on February 14, 2025, 06:22:58 AMMeh.  He's talking up his game and his new team.  It's all part of the show.  It helps to believe in what you're doing.

Until he actually follows up with consistent action, it's all just bluster. Empty words, IMO.
#forthew
лава Україні!
Elbows up!
井の中の蛙大海を知らず
History doesn't repeat itself, but it often rhymes.
In a world of human wreckage.

Throw Long Bannatyne

Quote from: TecnoGenius on February 14, 2025, 06:27:25 AMAs 6th/7th.  Not starting OG.  I see nothing to indicate Wallace is ready to start, or even will ever be.  That said, you often can't tell until you throw them in the fire.  So we may start him week 1 just to see, and then revert to Randolph by week 6 if it's not working out.

Can't really say yet, we haven't seen Wallace in any pass blocking situations so we don't know how well he works in reverse. Same with Eli and Dobson, they both do fine aggressively blocking forward, it takes more finesse to pass block well.

Blue In BC

Quote from: TecnoGenius on February 14, 2025, 06:25:52 AMWell that's just insane.  No sense saving it so we can do year-end early signings for '26.  Fans care about the home GC.  WM cares about the home GC.  Players care about the home GC.

We should be spending to the cap and a little beyond (no penalty worth caring about up to $100k overspend!).

The only thing I can think of is we are leaving plenty of room for mid-season NFL cuts, like Pokey.  And maybe some other-team mercenary NFL rejects (like Henoc was).  And vet-cutdown-day CFL rejects too.

This could be the year we are the ones making significant Sep/Oct/Nov player moves to beef up for a GC run (see SSK 2013).

That's my dream, anyhow.

We haven't seen any team spend the extra $400K yet. Most of the player movements were made during the tampering period which was before they knew of the increase.

The movement of free agents not due to tampering window deals has dropped significantly. I haven't seen any big name signed which might indicate any team using this extra money. I also can't see too many players left that might get bigger contracts.


O. Wilson is under contract so if he comes back it's on his original deal which was an ELC. While it may not have been rock bottom, it wasn't high either.

NFL cuts coming back mid season for the most part are just PR players. Only a few were veteran players that might have been in the CFL earlier. Only a few exceptions like Rourke and Betts returning in 2024. Mack came back but was still on his ELC IIRC.
One game at a time.

Throw Long Bannatyne

Quote from: Blue In BC on February 14, 2025, 03:09:49 PMWe haven't seen any team spend the extra $400K yet. Most of the player movements were made during the tampering period which was before they knew of the increase.

The movement of free agents not due to tampering window deals has dropped significantly. I haven't seen any big name signed which might indicate any team using this extra money. I also can't see too many players left that might get bigger contracts.


O. Wilson is under contract so if he comes back it's on his original deal which was an ELC. While it may not have been rock bottom, it wasn't high either.

NFL cuts coming back mid season for the most part are just PR players. Only a few were veteran players that might have been in the CFL earlier. Only a few exceptions like Rourke and Betts returning in 2024. Mack came back but was still on his ELC IIRC.

I haven't done the math but I have a hard time believing the Elks did not spend the extra cash, but as Walters said in the interview teams can spend the extra money how ever they see fit. 

markf

haven't the Bombers made money every season for some years?

I think the team is operated with that in mind.

Some of the others are, some are not. And one it seems, is run on a shoestring.

Blue In BC

#95
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 14, 2025, 03:20:00 PMI haven't done the math but I have a hard time believing the Elks did not spend the extra cash, but as Walters said in the interview teams can spend the extra money how ever they see fit. 

It was reported that no teams knew of the extra SMS. The Elks also trimmed some high salaries like: Lewis, MBT, Montcrief, Foucault, Oakman, Leonard and Purifoy. They also haven't yet re-signed another dozen or so of their own potential free agents.

Admittedly it's hard to calculate the + or - SMS. OTOH, With the exception of advance money or guaranteed money, none of this counts until final rosters are declared.
One game at a time.

theaardvark

Ford was basically replaced by a returning Parker..

Every year, you lose all stars, and new all stars show up.
Unabashed positron.  Blue koolaid in my fridge.  I wear my blue sunglasses at night.  Homer, d'oh.

Throw Long Bannatyne

Quote from: Blue In BC on February 14, 2025, 03:32:03 PMIt was reported that no teams knew of the extra SMS. The Elks also trimmed some high salaries like: Lewis, MBT, Montcrief, Foucault, Oakman and Purifoy. They also haven't yet re-signed another dozen or so of their own potential free agents.

Admittedly it's hard to calculate the + or - SMS. OTOH, With the exception of advance money or guaranteed money, none of this counts until final rosters are declared.


It's the number of $200k+ contracts added that stick out to me, that would include adding Ceresna, Fajardo, Robbie Smith, Brinkman, Ford and Kaion Julien-Grant who could be close. Of course they save a bit paying Tre Ford below premium.

Blue In BC

#98
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 14, 2025, 03:53:58 PMIt's the number of $200k+ contracts added that stick out to me, that would include adding Ceresna, Fajardo, Robbie Smith, Brinkman, Ford and Kaion Julien-Grant who could be close. Of course they save a bit paying Tre Ford below premium.

Sure but Lewis was paid more than Lawler in 2024. Their net QB room cost went down after MBT was traded. They only re-signed about 6 of their own 24 potential free agents. There is a lot of SMS going out the door. It's possible the Elks are willing to risk going over the 2025 SMS.

Time will tell who makes the roster and / or who might get traded before final rosters are set.  Here are their details.

Subtracted: QB McLeod Bethel-Thompson (A), DB Darrius Bratton (A), DL Elliott Brown (A), DL Demarcus Christmas (A), REC Gavin Cobb (N), OL David Foucault (N), DB Josh Hagerty (N), REC Tevin Jones (A), P Jake Julien (N), REC Eugene Lewis (A), REC Hergy Mayala (N), REC Dillon Mitchell (A), SAM Derrick Moncrief (A), DL Shawn Oakman (A), DL J-Min Pelley (N), DB Loucheiz Purifoy (A), OL Jakub Szott (N)

Still unsigned: DB Jeremie Dominique (N), REC Vincent Forbes-Mombleau (N), OL Tony Gray (A), DB Scott Hutter (N), DL A.C. Leonard (A), LB Les Maruo (G), DL Romeo McKnight (A), REC Kyran Moore (A), QB Dakota Prukop (A), OL Shane Richards (N), OL Hunter Steward (N)
One game at a time.

CrazyCanuck89

Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 14, 2025, 03:07:45 PMCan't really say yet, we haven't seen Wallace in any pass blocking situations so we don't know how well he works in reverse. Same with Eli and Dobson, they both do fine aggressively blocking forward, it takes more finesse to pass block well.

You've seen Eli block in passing situations.  He's subbed in at a couple positions during his career.

Jesse

Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 14, 2025, 03:20:00 PMI haven't done the math but I have a hard time believing the Elks did not spend the extra cash, but as Walters said in the interview teams can spend the extra money how ever they see fit. 

It just seems like they've spent more because they're turning over more of their roster.
My wife is amazing!

Throw Long Bannatyne

Quote from: CrazyCanuck89 on February 14, 2025, 04:22:41 PMYou've seen Eli block in passing situations.  He's subbed in at a couple positions during his career.

That's probably the main reason Eli isn't starting.

theaardvark

Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 14, 2025, 05:03:44 PMThat's probably the main reason Eli isn't starting.

You know, in College, Eli was touted as a top NFL prospect at C, right? 

The main reason he isn't starting is that there are better, more established players ahead of him on the DC.  But there is also a reason he is here, because he has the ability to step in when needed.
Unabashed positron.  Blue koolaid in my fridge.  I wear my blue sunglasses at night.  Homer, d'oh.

Jesse

Quote from: theaardvark on February 14, 2025, 05:37:21 PMYou know, in College, Eli was touted as a top NFL prospect at C, right? 

The main reason he isn't starting is that there are better, more established players ahead of him on the DC.  But there is also a reason he is here, because he has the ability to step in when needed.

College was 8 years ago. He's missed multiple years of his development in college and as a pro for various reasons. He had multiple rookies start ahead of him last season. He's here as a depth piece, sure. But his trajectory is much different than what we hoped for when he was drafted.
My wife is amazing!

Throw Long Bannatyne

Quote from: theaardvark on February 14, 2025, 05:37:21 PMYou know, in College, Eli was touted as a top NFL prospect at C, right? 

The main reason he isn't starting is that there are better, more established players ahead of him on the DC.  But there is also a reason he is here, because he has the ability to step in when needed.

Totally irrelevant, Walters was touting Wallace stepping up to starter, he didn't mention Eli who's been next man up since he arrived in 2019.