Bombers add Jarious Jackson, promote Hogan to OC

Started by Jesse, February 04, 2025, 12:03:53 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Blueforlife


TBURGESS

I think BC will be fighting for 1st in the west. 
Winnipeg Blue Bombers - 2019 Grey Cup Champs.

DM83

It's  the last year for Winnipeg's potential glory( O line) Are Walter's and O'Shea staying on? I mean those guys are awesome.

But as others have said BC should be better. The Elks should be better. Sask has unknowns and QB.
Calgary is "person non grata". Why don't they sign their stars. Their QB situation is potentially great.  The most disrespected QB gets another shot at legitimacy.  His is a sure "made for TV" movie.  Plays hard, team first guy, good skills.  If he plays within himself, and stops literally crying after crap plays, he could be around for a while. As of yet, he has really been victimized by management of all the teams he had been on. He needs help by being on a talented team.

Winnipeg? The management has proven itself. I don't like the results of re-loading, but, they have done it in the past.  Please just get a left guard!

GOLDMEMBER

I LOSHT MY MEMBER IN AN UNFORTUNATE SHMELTING ACCSHIDENT!

dd

BC's performance hinges on Rourke's play---will he come out like last years train wreck, if so, they are 4-5th in the west. If he comes out firing like he did in his rookie season, they are 1-2 in the west.

TecnoGenius

Quote from: dd on February 17, 2025, 04:19:41 PMBC's performance hinges on Rourke's play---will he come out like last years train wreck, if so, they are 4-5th in the west. If he comes out firing like he did in his rookie season, they are 1-2 in the west.

Who does he have to throw to?  McInnis may have been figured out already: he was neutralized for the last third of the season by every team.  And his body type is going to be prone to injuries now that he's getting older.

And aren't both of the "2 H's" gone?  Or maybe one was retained?  Not good enough.

Our ostensible, middle-of-the-road 2025 REC corps looks stellar compared to BC!

For Rourke to be successful he needs quality guys who can tear down the field or get in the zone hole fast and then catch his insane overloaded heaters.  They should have signed Kenny.
Never go full Rider!

TecnoGenius

Quote from: DM83 on February 16, 2025, 04:04:46 PM;) glad to see others support my rant on the OC.  Probably a nice guy. Under qualified, but he will prove to be overwhelmed.  It's not like anyone has supported the hire as an OC. Sure Brady likes him, but as mentioned earlier, being a coach of 1-3 guys compared to an entire offence couldn't be more extreme.  Totally weird.

Like Younger did (successfully!) in '24??

Maybe we've found the magic sauce:

Noob head coordinator + experienced coordinator-whisperer == success.

Mike Miller (STC) was also a no-experience noob thrown into the deep end and he exceeded all expectations.

I'm totally fine with Hogan and think he'll be great.  And if not, you can hire McAdoo in a hot second off his couch for a 2-4 and some smokes.  It's not like there aren't options out there!
Never go full Rider!

TecnoGenius

Quote from: Pete on February 15, 2025, 11:11:46 PMWhile Hogan will undoubtedly utilize the existing playbook, early.in tc he needs to establish that status quo with our offence is not good enough

Does the "playbook" remain property of the team?  If so I'd dust off the 2019 Lapo book and start there.  The farther away from the Lapo playbook Buck moved, the worse our outcome.

The only reservation I have is Hogan said his philosophy is KISS, simpler plays that are easier to learn & remember, and then it comes down to execution.

That's all well and good but I really want more creativity and complexity.  If you can do that and KISS for the players themselves (minus maybe the QB), then great.  However I'm not sure how you dumb our O schemes down any more than was done in the 2024 season.

In the GC it seemed like we had a book of only 10 plays and we just thought brute force and execution would win.  TOR did the misdirection and highbrain chess moves a la Lapo and ran circles around us (even before Zach's injury), winning with probably the worst "starting" QB in a generation.  With a revitalized East we'll never win another cup until we get back to highbrain chess tactics.
Never go full Rider!

J5V

Quote from: TecnoGenius on February 24, 2025, 03:22:27 AMDoes the "playbook" remain property of the team?  If so I'd dust off the 2019 Lapo book and start there.  The farther away from the Lapo playbook Buck moved, the worse our outcome.

If anything it was the opposite, IMO. It was the lack of creativity and the stubborn inability to adapt that I found so very frustrating. Reminded me a lot of Lapo.

Quote from: TecnoGenius on February 24, 2025, 03:22:27 AMThe only reservation I have is Hogan said his philosophy is KISS, simpler plays that are easier to learn & remember, and then it comes down to execution.

Like run the ball when you have the best running back in the league?

Quote from: TecnoGenius on February 24, 2025, 03:22:27 AMThat's all well and good but I really want more creativity and complexity.

Well you're not going to get that with Lapo's playbook. In Lapo's time do you not remember thinking that the defense knows exactly what we're going to do here"? I sure do.

Quote from: TecnoGenius on February 24, 2025, 03:22:27 AMIf you can do that and KISS for the players themselves (minus maybe the QB), then great.  However I'm not sure how you dumb our O schemes down any more than was done in the 2024 season.

In the GC it seemed like we had a book of only 10 plays and we just thought brute force and execution would win.  TOR did the misdirection and highbrain chess moves a la Lapo and ran circles around us (even before Zach's injury), winning with probably the worst "starting" QB in a generation.  With a revitalized East we'll never win another cup until we get back to highbrain chess tactics.

I'm not sure where you get the Lapo high brain stuff. Every defensive coordinator in the league knew exactly what we were going to do on every down when Lapo was here. Does run the ball for 3 yards on first down and throw the ball for 5 yards on second down ring any bells? That's what I remember and it sucked! I don't want Lapo's playbook anywhere near this offense. Yes I agree with you that we need more creativity and complexity and I hope that's what we get because we didn't get it with Buck(Lapo2).
Go Bombers!

theaardvark

A D knowing what you are doing, but you still doing it successfully can be a thing.  You just have to be better at executing the play that the D is at defending it.

Which was our run game (Hogan's) last year.  We ran at will over just about every team.  Until Buck had the brain fart and decided "They know we are going to run, so I'll pass, and he continued that trend even when Zach couldn't grip the ball.

You don't abandon what got you to the GC when you are playing the GC.
Unabashed positron.  Blue koolaid in my fridge.  I wear my blue sunglasses at night.  Homer, d'oh.

TecnoGenius

Quote from: J5V on February 24, 2025, 10:35:36 AMWell you're not going to get that with Lapo's playbook. In Lapo's time do you not remember thinking that the defense knows exactly what we're going to do here"? I sure do.

Did the Ds not have the same advantage with Buck?  Look at the GC.  After our 1 good series the D knew every play ahead of time like they were listening in on Buck's mic.

And it wasn't just the GC... most of our losses seemed to have the Ds "listening in", or making near-100% guesses as to what Buck would do.

Buck was also a "run on every 1st down" guy.  And then "pass on every 2nd & long".  We were probably the last team in the league if you count draw or run plays on 2nd & long.  The only thing you can give Buck is he'd take some shots on 2nd & long, whereas Lapo always wanted to throw for 7 on 2nd & 8 (SSK's current syndrome).

Quote from: J5V on February 24, 2025, 10:35:36 AMI'm not sure where you get the Lapo high brain stuff. Every defensive coordinator in the league knew exactly what we were going to do on every down when Lapo was here.

Remember the TSN talking heads in our Lapo-OC era?  It was always "the master of misdirection" and pre-snap movement.  We were known for all the complex movements and schemes and every single season after Lapo left we had less and less of that.  Until finally the last GC where there's basically no movement, no misdirection, no nothing.  We just run straight forward and everyone curls and we wonder why Zach gets INT'd (see: GC).

Remember the "do you know the play?  I don't know the play?  What's the play <SNAP>" trick we did on many sneaks in '19?

Lapo is well known as the "X and O genius".  I want to get back to that.  Buck thought we could just run straight forward and bully everyone at all times and while that worked in '21 when we were miles above every other team, it doesn't work so well when 2-4 other teams have caught up in talent.  I hope that Hogan KISS doesn't mean even less misdirection and trickery and creativity.
Never go full Rider!

J5V

Quote from: TecnoGenius on February 24, 2025, 06:57:02 PMDid the Ds not have the same advantage with Buck?  Look at the GC.  After our 1 good series the D knew every play ahead of time like they were listening in on Buck's mic.

Agree. Buck was just as bad.

Quote from: TecnoGenius on February 24, 2025, 06:57:02 PMThe only thing you can give Buck is he'd take some shots on 2nd & long, whereas Lapo always wanted to throw for 7 on 2nd & 8 (SSK's current syndrome).

It's going to be interesting to see how Buck makes out in BC.

Quote from: TecnoGenius on February 24, 2025, 06:57:02 PMRemember the TSN talking heads in our Lapo-OC era?  It was always "the master of misdirection" and pre-snap movement.  We were known for all the complex movements and schemes and every single season after Lapo left we had less and less of that.  Until finally the last GC where there's basically no movement, no misdirection, no nothing.  We just run straight forward and everyone curls and we wonder why Zach gets INT'd (see: GC).

I don't disagree, I'm sure Lapo knows his Xs and Os as far as play design is concerned. It's his game management, predictability/lack of imagination/timing I have a problem with.

Quote from: TecnoGenius on February 24, 2025, 06:57:02 PMRemember the "do you know the play?  I don't know the play?  What's the play <SNAP>" trick we did on many sneaks in '19?

Lapo is well known as the "X and O genius".  I want to get back to that.  Buck thought we could just run straight forward and bully everyone at all times and while that worked in '21 when we were miles above every other team, it doesn't work so well when 2-4 other teams have caught up in talent.  I hope that Hogan KISS doesn't mean even less misdirection and trickery and creativity.

I'm hoping for the best and I'm willing to be patient as long as we see signs of progress. What was disappointing to me with Buck was his lack of development after many years as the Blue Bomber OC.
Go Bombers!

Blueforlife

Buck and Lapo are both good OCs, both found a lot of success and had issues along the way.  Buck will take time to figure it out in BC but if he does could be deadly.

I have zero worries about our OC, other than potential slow start which could be OL dependent.

DM83

Not sure you said it. I thought you did..
Buck tried, but didn't exactly have the crazy misdirection knowledge Lapo knew and understood. Lapo used more misdirection, and that screwed up defensive alignments pre snap. Buck tried, but went more Olivera.  Then as you mentioned, the defenses keyed more in down and distance, and with the lack of road graders who could also pass block were able to defeat us.

Now we have a situation where we have a great RB coach, but who lacks a coach Lapolice's "abstract" motion understanding. (Honestly, I don't think anyone does!) So we will at best see an offence similar to last year. It will be good but pre snap predictable. Plus with a lack of quality receivers and blockers,(predictable limited pre snap) therefore enabling pre snap predictability. Therefore-similar (predictable tendency results)That will also allowdefenses to shut down those plays.

The kid has three? years pro experience to anticipate pro-defensive player abilities in the secondary defensive alignments....(as a RB coach he is not watching secondary or passing down defensive tendencies, but defensive front seven formations that would potentially shut down defensive fronts..,like who is filling gaps if it's a running down situation)

If I, as a defensive coach, and it's a running down situation, am I guessing the tendency has proven to me Brady off tackle left, or be a "read"  am I bringing my SAM up to the LOS, or crashing my corner to fill,inside to narrow the running lane, and again if so let Brady read and bounce if the secondary crashes? Inside, and Brady reads, and cuts off the potential "kick" out block" by either an off side. Backside slot, or other pulling guard. 

That's what the RB coach, and OL coach, and therefore, the offensive co-ordinator, have to coach. Does the "kid" have the creds to speak up? Probably? But if not?

TecnoGenius

And there's the best thing so far about Hogan as OC: we aren't suddenly going to be thrust into a pass-first/pass-mostly OC paradigm.  An ex-RB coach should make sure we keep our run-heavy character.

Good!
Never go full Rider!