Beating SSK

[Throw Long Bannatyne]

Very interesting watch how Zach dismantled their D with patience and experience.

Check downs to Brady may not work this game if the Riders follow the Als blueprint and have a LB spy on him sneaking out of the backfield. I wish they would have worked a FB into their offensive schemes like Hamilton does for the odd occasion Brady is shut down.

[blue_gold_84]

I wish they would have worked a FB into their offensive schemes like Hamilton does for the odd occasion Brady is shut down.

Probably not necessary with the receiver talent/depth. Demski's skill set makes a FB redundant, IMO.

[BLUEBOMBER]

The BB need to put out their "A" game to beat Saskatchewan. The Riders have nothing to lose so they will go all out. If the BB think they can walk all over the Riders, they will be in for a pretty nasty surprise.

[dd]

If Collaros has been anything this year, its been inconsistent. If the 25-0 over BC Zack shows up, its game over Riders. If the 7 sack, struggling O line shows up, look out, there'll be turnovers and Riders have a chance. After a weeks rest, I am hoping we could out with our A game, but there's always that rust vs rest argument

[Blue In BC]

If Collaros has been anything this year, its been inconsistent. If the 25-0 over BC Zack shows up, its game over Riders. If the 7 sack, struggling O line shows up, look out, there'll be turnovers and Riders have a chance. After a weeks rest, I am hoping we could out with our A game, but there's always that rust vs rest argument

How goes the OL so goes the running game and our QB. If we control the LOS we win.

[Mick]

If Collaros has been anything this year, its been inconsistent. If the 25-0 over BC Zack shows up, its game over Riders. If the 7 sack, struggling O line shows up, look out, there'll be turnovers and Riders have a chance. After a weeks rest, I am hoping we could out with our A game, but there's always that rust vs rest argument

WPG is very good after a bye week.

[dd]

How goes the OL so goes the running game and our QB. If we control the LOS we win.

For sure, and if we don't, we lose, its about as simple as that.

[Throw Long Bannatyne]

How goes the OL so goes the running game and our QB. If we control the LOS we win.

In each of the last two games they played the Riders, they allowed Dirty Miles Brown to knock a QB out of the game, but that was with Kendall Randolph playing LT in place of Stan.

[Blue In BC]

In each of the last two games they played the Riders, they allowed Dirty Miles Brown to knock a QB out of the game, but that was with Kendall Randolph playing LT in place of Stan.

Could be. It's usually easy to tell early if we use and succeed with the run game. We need to have a balanced offence and that starts with Brady. Otherwise the Riders pin their ears back and will pressure Collaros into mistakes and many 2 and outs.

In the last few games we seemed to go away from the running attack in the 1st half. I have no idea why we did that.

The 1st IR report for the Riders show about 6 starters not practising. We'll have to see if that continues and / or how much it limits their game performance.

[Mick]

In each of the last two games they played the Riders, they allowed Dirty Miles Brown to knock a QB out of the game, but that was with Kendall Randolph playing LT in place of Stan.

Very true, I honestly believe we are going to see a stellar performance by our OL Saturday. Cox and Reavis would be a huge loss to the riders D.

[Throw Long Bannatyne]

Could be. It's usually easy to tell early if we use and succeed with the run game. We need to have a balanced offence and that starts with Brady. Otherwise the Riders pin their ears back and will pressure Collaros into mistakes and many 2 and outs.

In the last few games we seemed to go away from the running attack in the 1st half. I have no idea why we did that.

The 1st IR report for the Riders show about 6 starters not practising. We'll have to see if that continues and / or how much it limits their game performance.

Started rewatching the LDC and the BB last night, Sask. shut Brady down in the LDC but in the BB he had much more success running and as an outlet receiver as Zach  moved the ball quickly, taking what was given.

[markf]

passes to Brady out of the backfield, after defenders have backed off, is basically a long hand off....seems like the remedy for the o line v their D line problem.

and if they spy him, leaves someone else open doesn't it?

I think Harris is a lot better quarterback than seems to be generally thought. accurate, ball out quickly.

thanks Mick, for the Lapo video

[Mick]

passes to Brady out of the backfield, after defenders have backed off, is basically a long hand off....seems like the remedy for the o line v their D line problem.

and if they spy him, leaves someone else open doesn't it?

I think Harris is a lot better quarterback than seems to be generally thought. accurate, ball out quickly.

thanks Mick, for the Lapo video

I imagine the bombers will be running this same scheme, and if SSK tries counter by spy, it will open someone else up down field. SSK also did not get nearly the pressure on Zach as other teams have during the year.

[Throw Long Bannatyne]

I imagine the bombers will be running this same scheme, and if SSK tries counter by spy, it will open someone else up down field. SSK also did not get nearly the pressure on Zach as other teams have during the year.

The Rider spy was Thurman their MLB, he helps out in shallow zone but isn't out there to cover receivers one on one.

[markf]

are the riders dirty?

very first play in the Lapo video Brady tackled, out of bounds, play over, Brady getting up,

#6 Riders shoves him back down.... obvious dirty play, no penalty call.

Not holding out much hope, but I hope the refs do not let those things go.