A large part of my comment was that we've lost talented depth. Whether the 2nd year DB's are currently better than Taylor is somewhat of a question. Taylor was very good when he was healthy. He may have been more expensive a SMS hit but I'd say he was a very strong player in the secondary.
Same thing with Couture. Glad to have Eli back but Couture is still better than Kolankowski. So that's a downgrade made for SMS reasons.
We are in a very strong position DB-wise compared to previous years where we always starting 1-2 rookies (read: crap-shoots). We'll have Holm and Parker going into year 2 and both looking decent (Parker could be full legit), and Houston will be back from injury (will be year 3 and was looking very fine). Add BA, Rose, Nichols, and even Darby and we don't have a single weak spot and have at least 1 non-rookie as depth.
Add in a probable new scout find wunderkind and we're sitting pretty.
P.S. You're bang-on about Taylor's capability, and I want him back, but the newer guys will do a good job and get better over the season. The only concern I would have is if it's Holm at Taylor's spot. I'm not sold on Holm, but he's not bad per se. I think we roll with Parker and Houston, with Holm as depth.
Couture better than Ko-man? I thought so too, but when Ko-man stepped in and played all those games I didn't notice any drop off at C.... except maybe that left A-gap with Gray. If that's more a C problem then that would make good proof. In any event, they patched that up by late season. My point is, I doubt we'll miss a beat with Ko-man at C and Couture gone, just like we all said "Chungh who" after much off-season panic and then 3 games without him.