|
Austin85
|
 |
« on: June 18, 2022, 02:14:56 AM » |
|
I like our receiver's . Do you think any one are legitimate deep threat ones ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
pjrocksmb
|
|
« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2022, 02:24:20 AM » |
|
Shoen occasionally
I like em too
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 18, 2022, 02:28:54 AM by pjrocksmb »
|
Logged
|
I don't follow the No Fun League b/c I live in Canada and love the CFL
|
|
|
Top Gun
Newbie
Posts: 30
|
|
« Reply #2 on: June 18, 2022, 02:29:05 AM » |
|
I like our receiver's . Do you think any one are legitimate deep threat ones ?
None |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sir Blue and Gold
|
|
« Reply #3 on: June 18, 2022, 02:30:17 AM » |
|
We don't have a jump ball guy like Lawler but there are very few of those. Demski is probably the best deep route guy we got because of his speed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
pjrocksmb
|
|
« Reply #4 on: June 18, 2022, 03:03:13 AM » |
|
We don't have a jump ball guy like Lawler but there are very few of those. Demski is probably the best deep route guy we got because of his speed.
Disagree on Demski and deep ball Love the guy but chance he consistently catches a deep ball is low Agree no jumper |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I don't follow the No Fun League b/c I live in Canada and love the CFL
|
|
|
|
TecnoGenius
|
|
« Reply #5 on: June 18, 2022, 04:04:57 AM » |
|
All our receivers are deep threats. Will we use them that way? Maybe once in a while hoping for a bust on breaking tendencies.
Fastest to slowest: Demski, Ellingson, Schoen, Woli, Bailey (my guesses)
We use Demski the most in terms of post-go routes (remember the vs SSK games in '19 and '21?). Woli has made the deep rail catch (never JFG!) a few times. But we haven't tried that throw in quite a long time -- maybe not since Lapo?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Never go full Rider!
|
|
|
|
bunker
|
|
« Reply #6 on: June 18, 2022, 04:54:36 AM » |
|
All our receivers are deep threats. Will we use them that way? Maybe once in a while hoping for a bust on breaking tendencies.
Fastest to slowest: Demski, Ellingson, Schoen, Woli, Bailey (my guesses)
We use Demski the most in terms of post-go routes (remember the vs SSK games in '19 and '21?). Woli has made the deep rail catch (never JFG!) a few times. But we haven't tried that throw in quite a long time -- maybe not since Lapo?
Schoen has better speed that most think, has run a 4.47 40. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 18, 2022, 04:57:57 AM by bunker »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Sir Blue and Gold
|
|
« Reply #7 on: June 18, 2022, 10:14:19 AM » |
|
Disagree on Demski and deep ball
Love the guy but chance he consistently catches a deep ball is low
Agree no jumper
Maybe but we have been using Demski in that role more this year. People wondering where he was to start the season. Well, he's not near the line and scrimmage as much as last year (and way less than when Lapo was here), he's deeper downfield clearing out and stretching the defense. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
GOLDMEMBER
|
|
« Reply #8 on: June 18, 2022, 11:47:05 AM » |
|
Shoen occasionally
I like em too
None We have possession style WRs only |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I LOSHT MY MEMBER IN AN UNFORTUNATE SHMELTING ACCSHIDENT!
|
|
|
|
The Zipp
|
|
« Reply #9 on: June 18, 2022, 12:54:01 PM » |
|
What are you defining as deep?
We can go deep with any of them and do. We don't have a Tyreek Hill but nobody really does.
I really think we may have found the next Brandon Zylstra in Shoen.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
3rdand1.5
|
|
« Reply #10 on: June 18, 2022, 01:05:44 PM » |
|
I think our receivers are very good. We haven't seen deep routes develop IMO as ZC hasn't had the time due to poor o-line play. Bring up the level of play on the o-line and our receivers will have the deep ball ability.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
dd
|
|
« Reply #11 on: June 18, 2022, 01:26:25 PM » |
|
Demski on his post or corner routes is a bonafide deep threat as he finds the end zone often with these routes. But we need to get him more involved in the offense with his jet sweeps and shallow drag routes. Missed yesterday?s game but the first game, he was very quiet, need to get the ball in his hands. Like what we ve seen from Ellingson and Shoen so far
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
the paw
|
|
« Reply #12 on: June 18, 2022, 02:55:48 PM » |
|
Much ado about nothing. Just this last game Ellingson, Schoen, and Wolitarsky all had a 30 yard reception. Bailey had one for 24. And we know from last year that Demski can get open deep.
Moreover, Ellingson is long, and can make the tough grabs with guys draped on him. Lawler is a little better at the 50-50, but Ellingson can make those grabs. He comes as advertised.
My only concern about our receivers is that (a) Bailey isn?t getting as much of the workload as I had expected, and (b) we don?t have a ton of depth on the PR.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
grab grass 'n growl
|
|
|
|
theaardvark
|
|
« Reply #13 on: June 18, 2022, 02:58:24 PM » |
|
I think any can be a deep threat, which means DB's will be kept guessing off the line... who's heading deep, who's crossing, etc...
Buck will figure out more on how to use them as the season continues and he gets more film...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Unabashed positron. Blue koolaid in my fridge. I wear my blue sunglasses at night. Homer, d'oh.
|
|
|
|
BBRT
|
|
« Reply #14 on: June 18, 2022, 03:05:22 PM » |
|
I think any can be a deep threat, which means DB's will be kept guessing off the line... who's heading deep, who's crossing, etc...
Buck will figure out more on how to use them as the season continues and he gets more film...
I am going to disagree with your statement - I do not believe we have any WR that scare DB's. We IMHO do not have that speedly WR that can challenge DB's. I do not believe we have replaced who we lost from last year in terms of a WR that can scare folks. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
