GDT Edm at Ham, Sat Sep 20, 6:00PM

Started by gobombersgo, September 19, 2025, 04:48:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

TecnoGenius

Quote from: dd on September 21, 2025, 03:04:03 AMThere must have been an ineligible end outside the tight end and instead of being a yard off the line to keep the TE eligible, he must have been up on the line making him the end and ineligible if not reported. I d love to see the video or photo of the alignment to see what was called, but that's what I m thinking the furthest player out on the line was ineligible and on the line hence cancelling any eligible players they had on the line

Voila.  Note, Major says "no end on left side", so the right side of my pic should be the problem.

The guy on that spot is small, almost certainly not a hoggie?  He appears lined up beside his hoggie the same way the guy on the right is lined up with his hoggie.

Let's assume Killam really does know his ST schemes and alignments... surely refs botched something if he's that miffed?

Never go full Rider!

dd

Thanks for the image. I can see a zero on the one guy, I'm thinking he was number 70 and that would make the guy beside him to the inside ineligible and guy on the very end they would have said was off the line. To me it's a very ticky tack call, and they always say make sure the foul impacts the play. In this instance it had zero impact on the play, the ref should and will be reprimanded but that doesn't do the elks any good after the fact