Main Menu

Recent posts

#61
...I think an import draft is a good idea in the same sense that I think we could just call it "the CFL draft" and find the best players on planet earth not in the NFL and play them.

There's both your credibility and simplicity in one easy sentence.
#62
Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: No Rebuild
Last post by Blueforlife - January 16, 2026, 11:15:48 AM
Agree with Techno on the OL and DL, critical for us to improve and think long term success and continuity with these units.  OL worries me, DL will sort itself out hopefully.
#63
Looks like Jackson is gonzo.. he didn't seem to be do much for the BB anyways. Hope Condell can handle both duties.
#64
Collaros should last another year or two.. enough time to help mentor a successor.
#65
Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: No Rebuild
Last post by DM83 - January 16, 2026, 05:41:52 AM
This topic of a rebuild is BS.

Teams  turnover many of their players for various reasons.
Most serious Bomber fans  can tell when the changes are needed.

The Bombers are way too old. Football players have a shelf life from 20-30. (Give or take a few years.)  hanging on to some guys is great for sentimental reasons. Not so much for being the best players at their positions.

I sentimentally still think big Stan and Neuf? I think they  Can still be adequate.
What about Brady? How about that volleyball player? Eh I mean D E ? Three sacks?! That is embarrassing.

Oh well Walter's,Danny and OShea do well with what they have..and Wade resurrected the sinking ship.  Now he should be the next commish


#66
Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: 2026 CFL Winter Meetings
Last post by DM83 - January 16, 2026, 05:17:17 AM
This new commish seems to be the most clueless the CFL has had for the last 60 years.
#67
Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: 2026 CFL Winter Meetings
Last post by Tecno - January 16, 2026, 03:38:53 AM
IMP draft is the dumbest thing I've ever heard.  Thankfully it's really a non-issue.  Not even sure why he's bringing it up.

Almost never do 2 teams scout the same guy.  They are all NFL rejects who teams are taking wild flyers on and no nothing concrete about until they get to TC.

Why would a draft be needed?

Maybe all of this nonsense is to distract from the actual changes occurring that are causing an actual uproar.
#68
Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: 2026 CFL Winter Meetings
Last post by Tecno - January 16, 2026, 03:16:59 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 16, 2026, 12:59:53 AMI think adding pressure to the refs.

It also may spell the end of portly stick handlers.  Those dudes are going to be hustling now to get those sticks moved 50Y downfield and set well before the 35s clock expires.

Let's say it takes them 20s in some cases... that means teams may be breaking the huddle before the sticks are even set!  And how will the line refs set their feet spread if there is no stick there yet?

I really do foresee a big keystone cops farce by all parties involved for the first few weeks.  HCs won't be fast enough picking units, players won't be fast enough entering/leaving the field (good luck with hoggies), chain gang will be tripping over themselves sprinting to the new spot, refs will be falling down trying to get the ball set in a reasonable time frame.

The hubris in thinking CFL people can do it better/faster than the NFL people, and on a longer (for now) and wider field!  I can see them switching to a 40s clock in '27.  They probably chose 35s simply because they wanted to avoid the "Americanization" cry that the other changes were already inducing, knowing full well in the end they really wanted 40.
#69
Offside Forum / Re: Blue Jays
Last post by JockitchwithRich - January 16, 2026, 03:06:17 AM
Sadly Tucker chose the Dodgers

Bichette decision is still dangling in the air
#70
Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum / Re: No Rebuild
Last post by Tecno - January 16, 2026, 03:06:15 AM
Quote from: Jesse on January 16, 2026, 12:04:17 AMI tend to agree with what MOS said that it's not a "rebuild".

I think most of us agree that a "blow it all up" rebuild isn't necessary right now.  However, some may say we kind of need a rebuild of certain units.  Like OL & DL.

Quote from: Jesse on January 16, 2026, 12:04:17 AMBut Walters has already stated that he and MOS agreed that this off season is different in the sense that the results were not good enough and this is the first time they've been in the situation to "re-tool" a team since they originally built it up from scratch.

I'm not sure about "since they originally built it" (i.e. 2012)... Since 2016 or so, ya.  Since Biggie, AH, Nichols arrived they have been in (my oft-said) "puzzle piece" mode.  What MOS/KW may be hinting at is we have regressed so much in '25 that a simple "puzzle piece" (or 2, 3) is not going to fix our problems.  In that sense, it is a "rebuild" of sorts compared to our normal standard.

For instance, I don't see how we sit by with just 1 change on OL.  Normally our OL would suffer 1 big FA$$ loss to a sniper -- not us actually send a heretofore starter packing.  Normally we'd already have our replacements in-house as NAT DP backups.  None of this is true this FA.  We're going to have to FA or scout/draft some major OL pieces -- AND they will have to be better than what we let walk in Ko-man and what we might let walk in Rand/Vant.  Not to mention the probably-never-starter Eli and maybe-never-starter bad-round-DP Viebert.