https://www.bluebombers.com/2026/06/23/3-takeaways-from-the-dru-brown-trade/
Blue Bombers acquire quarterback Dru Brown in trade with Ottawa
WINNIPEG, MB., June 23, 2026 – The Winnipeg Blue Bombers today announce the club has acquired quarterback Dru Brown and a second round pick in the 2027 CFL Draft (previously traded by Winnipeg to Ottawa), in exchange for Winnipeg's first round selection in 2027 and a second round selection in 2028 (conditional).
Brown (5-11, 200; Oklahoma State; born: March 21, 1997, in Palo Alto, CA) first came to the CFL with the Blue Bombers in 2021 and spent three seasons with the club, appearing in 38 games over that span and going 2-1 in his three starts while also being a member of the 2021 Grey Cup championship team.
His negotiating rights were traded to Ottawa on January 18, 2024, before he became a free agent and after signing with the RedBlacks he was the team's starter in 2024-25.
Brown appeared in 11 games with Ottawa in 2025 and completed 71.5 percent of his passes for 2,389 yards with 14 touchdowns against 10 interceptions. In his first season with Ottawa the team was 8-6 in his 14 starts and advanced to the playoffs for the first time since 2018 as he threw for 3,959 yards and 18 touchdowns with 10 interceptions.
In 2023, his last season in Winnipeg before heading to Ottawa, Brown set a CFL record for the most touchdown passes thrown without an interception in a season with nine.
The Blue Bombers first signed Brown on March 11, 2020, but the 2020 season was cancelled due to the COVID-19 pandemic. He made his debut in 2021.
Brown split his college days between the College of San Mateo (2015), Hawaii (2016-17) and Oklahoma State (2018-19). He was named the MVP of the 2016 Hawaii Bowl after leading Hawaii to a win over Middle Tennessee.
Ummm...why?
Gives us some real depth at qb, nearly every team ly needed the backup for a number of games. Given our history lately with 1st round picks its not too high a price
Its a good idea to grab him for the future if this is Zach's last season. Just surprised they do it now.
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on June 23, 2026, 10:29:32 PMUmmm...why?
Have you heard of the term succession planning? Have you heard of the term insurance policy?
Umm..why not?
Absolutely fantastic trade. Good day to be a Bomber fan. The son is back and the teacher is waiting to finish his training.
hopefully it doesn't mean Zach is hurt.
Quote from: The Zipp on June 23, 2026, 10:35:07 PMhopefully it doesn't mean Zach is hurt.
1st thing my buddy thought
My happy meter will be 110% as long as Zach is ok
My confidence meter just went from a B to an A for this club mid term
I always loved Dru. I think a bigger question wil be is he hurt and can remain healthy mid term.
Quote from: Pete on June 23, 2026, 10:32:00 PMGives us some real depth at qb, nearly every team ly needed the backup for a number of games. Given our history lately with 1st round picks its not too high a price
Price was reasonable
DRUSKI!
I don't know how they fit him on the roster - or what this means for Elgersma. But ultimately, you bring good players in and let them figure it out on the field.
Lots of possibilities here i guess.
Collaros might be playing through something the team is a little concerned about and want a more proven/ready backup if he can't go.
They want to contend this year and want to give Elgersma more time to learn the ropes and not throw him in if Zac gets hurt.
Maybe they're having some doubts about the overall ceiling of Elgersma and this move not only gives us depth this year but locks down a good qb that can take over as starter next season (assuming ZC retires).
That is a massive insurance policy behind Zach!
the risk is that Brown is on a one year contract so if hes in our succession plan we need to extend him
Quote from: Pete on June 23, 2026, 10:46:14 PMthe risk is that Brown is on a ne year contract so if hes in our succession plan we need to extend him
That probably isn't the main reason he's here. We don't have a back-up plan and the FA QBs were garbage so we kinda had to put Elgersma in that role which he completely isn't ready for.
one more thing Ott must be looking around maybe at Arbuckle?? They can't role with Mair can they??
Quote from: Jesse on June 23, 2026, 10:42:08 PMDRUSKI!
I don't know how they fit him on the roster - or what this means for Elgersma.
I suspect Perkins best be looking over his shoulder.
Quote from: VictorRomano on June 23, 2026, 10:50:43 PMI suspect Perkins best be looking over his shoulder.
He's the short yardage guy. He's not going anywhere. I bet Elgersma is on the reserve roster.
Quote from: Pete on June 23, 2026, 10:46:14 PMthe risk is that Brown is on a one year contract so if hes in our succession plan we need to extend him
5 yr 1mil total lock him up I know I'm dreaming but you get what I mean 😏
unnecessary and bad trade. succession plan, sure. but a 1st? with few quality canadians already? on a one year deal?? man I wish I had KW ego. Although I didn't realize at first the second is conditional. I guess we will see but at first glance, this pick looks closer to 2nd overall than 9th
I think its a great move. Having a viable #2 is far more important than the draft pick, and could be the difference between us making and not making the playoffs, were Zach to go down for a few games, or more. Also gives us a more viable replacement for Zach next year, if he retires. Also provides Walters with some leverage when negotiating with Zach, if Zach plays well this year and wants to come back in 2027. Win win as far as I can see.
Quote from: towelie on June 23, 2026, 10:45:11 PMLots of possibilities here i guess.
Collaros might be playing through something the team is a little concerned about and want a more proven/ready backup if he can't go.
They want to contend this year and want to give Elgersma more time to learn the ropes and not throw him in if Zac gets hurt.
Maybe they're having some doubts about the overall ceiling of Elgersma and this move not only gives us depth this year but locks down a good qb that can take over as starter next season (assuming ZC retires).
Best one two punch for future proofing our QB
Quote from: Jesse on June 23, 2026, 10:42:08 PMDRUSKI!
I don't know how they fit him on the roster - or what this means for Elgersma. But ultimately, you bring good players in and let them figure it out on the field.
Good point, Brown restructured his contract prior to this season but I imagine he's still making $250k-$300k as at the time of signing he was projected to be the Ottawa starter. I believe in the case of a trade the contract terms are assumed by the team that acquires the player, so should be a challenge for Walters to make this work.
Either way. This makes no sense for Ottawa. No experienced backup and Maier looks awful. Unless they have another trade in the works they may just be writing off this season...
Quote from: 3rdand1.5 on June 23, 2026, 10:49:56 PMone more thing Ott must be looking around maybe at Arbuckle?? They can't role with Mair can they??
Tor will not give in to that trade.
I won't be surprised if they sign Terry Wilson.
Brown isn't replacing Perkins as the SY QB, does that mean Elgersma gets booted to the PR?
Quote from: Jesse on June 23, 2026, 10:52:23 PMHe's the short yardage guy. He's not going anywhere. I bet Elgersma is on the reserve roster.
I'd be surprised if they wouldn't just hand the SY role to Elgersma.
Quote from: kkc60 on June 23, 2026, 11:02:25 PMunnecessary and bad trade. succession plan, sure. but a 1st? with few quality canadians already? on a one year deal?? man I wish I had KW ego
Now I have heard it all
Necessary for succession planning
Necessary for insurance
Necessary to give our young stud at QB time
Necessary for long term organizational stability at QB
Good trade
Yes we will loose a good Canadian player 100%
But we just got a good American vet
We can sign him cheap 1 yr deal non issue handled internally
Maybe trade for a draft pick as assets allow or sign a guy pluck a cdn off pr lots ways to shore up cdns which is always a concern
Quote from: pdirks67 on June 23, 2026, 11:06:56 PMI'd be surprised if they wouldn't just hand the SY role to Elgersma.
110%
Quote from: pdirks67 on June 23, 2026, 11:06:56 PMI'd be surprised if they wouldn't just hand the SY role to Elgersma.
He's 7 ft tall and not very sneaky, Perkins has been perfect.
Quote from: M.O.A.B. on June 23, 2026, 11:11:14 PMand why not?
Echo echo echo
Fffacts of life
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on June 23, 2026, 11:13:07 PMHe's 7 ft tall and not very sneaky, Perkins has been perfect.
He can do it, yes not as well but keep him on the AR as he is a special talent to develop
A good debate thought massive decision
Quote from: 3rdand1.5 on June 23, 2026, 10:49:56 PMone more thing Ott must be looking around maybe at Arbuckle?? They can't role with Mair can they??
Missing puzzle piece, Ottawa signs MBT.
https://3downnation.com/2026/06/23/ottawa-redblacks-to-sign-qb-mcleod-bethel-thompson-report/ (https://3downnation.com/2026/06/23/ottawa-redblacks-to-sign-qb-mcleod-bethel-thompson-report/)
Quote from: Blueforlife on June 23, 2026, 11:08:41 PMNow I have heard it all
Necessary for succession planning
Necessary for insurance
Necessary to give our young stud at QB time
Necessary for long term organizational stability at QB
Good trade
Yes we will loose a good Canadian player 100%
But we just got a good American vet
We can sign him cheap 1 yr deal non issue handled internally
Maybe trade for a draft pick as assets allow or sign a guy pluck a cdn off pr lots ways to shore up cdns which is always a concern
so then why did we spend a 2nd round pick on Elgersma? You're assuming Brown is cool with signing a one year deal, and assuming Elgersma is cool not having a shot to be the starter. He didn't even want to come here over the UFL for that exact reason.
Sure, it is nice having the depth and it very well could be a very big trade that pays off. But I think it's also a huge risk and replacing the potential impact of a first round pick with a "PR player" or trading another draft pick for a canadian (which seldom happens, and when it does it's for depth players mostly) is downplaying the cost
Seems strange to me. Ottawa lost it's backup QB for a couple of draft picks? We added a big salary 2nd string QB on a 1 year contract. How is that future planning?
Is Collaros hurt? One of the backup QB's? Where did we get the SMS room?
Best thing is we don't have to worry about our back QB now.
Oh MBT it is
https://3downnation.com/2026/06/23/ottawa-redblacks-to-sign-qb-mcleod-bethel-thompson-report/
It's a bit weird. How are we going to fit another $320,000 on the roster? What is happening to Perkins and Elgersma and the roster now? Is Zach okay? Why now instead of the off-season? The cost is less than I first thought. We gave up a first, but got our own second rounder back. That's not terrible. Wonder what the Bombers know that we don't. Elgersma happy? Not happy? What's the condition on the other 2028 pick? If he re-signs?
Quote from: kkc60 on June 23, 2026, 11:30:27 PMso then why did we spend a 2nd round pick on Elgersma? You're assuming Brown is cool with signing a one year deal, and assuming Elgersma is cool not having a shot to be the starter. He didn't even want to come here over the UFL for that exact reason.
Sure, it is nice having the depth and it very well could be a very big trade that pays off. But I think it's also a huge risk and replacing the potential impact of a first round pick with a "PR player" or trading another draft pick for a canadian (which seldom happens, and when it does it's for depth players mostly) is downplaying the cost
So why not keep both
1. Godfather Zach
2. Father Dru
3. Son Elgersma
Qb solidified for 15 years in dream scenario
That's organizational long term planning
That's vision
That's good biz
That's keeping butts in stands
Sorry this is a good news as there is
LETS GO BOMBERS!!!!
Management just hit an in the park HR
Quote from: Blueforlife on June 23, 2026, 11:36:53 PMSo why not keep both
1. Godfather Zach
2. Father Dru
3. Son Elgersma
Qb solidified for 15 years in dream scenario
That's organizational long term planning
That's vision
That's good biz
That's keeping butts in stands
Sorry this is a good news as there is
LETS GO BOMBERS!!!!
Management just hit an in the park HR
cool you missed all my points. yay management!!
Quote from: kkc60 on June 23, 2026, 11:37:57 PMcool you missed all my points. yay management!!
Do we have ANY guarantee Elgersma won't get hurt or like it here or be any good? He sure took his time getting here, and since I work in HR heck I'd have a backup plan to him too.
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on June 23, 2026, 11:35:23 PMIt's a bit weird. How are we going to fit another $320,000 on the roster? What is happening to Perkins and Elgersma and the roster now? Is Zach okay? Why now instead of the off-season? The cost is less than I first thought. We gave up a first, but got our own second rounder back. That's not terrible. Wonder what the Bombers know that we don't. Elgersma happy? Not happy? What's the condition on the other 2028 pick? If he re-signs?
If he re-signs and plays a certain amount of games (haven't seen the specific number yet).
Quote from: kkc60 on June 23, 2026, 11:30:27 PMso then why did we spend a 2nd round pick on Elgersma? You're assuming Brown is cool with signing a one year deal, and assuming Elgersma is cool not having a shot to be the starter. He didn't even want to come here over the UFL for that exact reason.
Sure, it is nice having the depth and it very well could be a very big trade that pays off. But I think it's also a huge risk and replacing the potential impact of a first round pick with a "PR player" or trading another draft pick for a canadian (which seldom happens, and when it does it's for depth players mostly) is downplaying the cost
Tricky situation, don't want to see them blow it with Elgersma, they have to convince him he will become the starting QB within 2 years. Brown had his shot and is rehabbing his career, I take it he wanted to bale from Ottawa and accepts whatever comes his way. Zach is going to be ecstatic having him back in the QB room, he mentions their friendship often.
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on June 23, 2026, 11:35:23 PMIt's a bit weird. How are we going to fit another $320,000 on the roster? What is happening to Perkins and Elgersma and the roster now?
Ya, the main concern now is SMS implications. Especially if he never sees the field if Zach stays upright.
Are we sure it's $320k? I thought OTT anointed him starter when he signed? That would mean starter-but-somewhat-unproven salary. I guess $320k sounds right, but seems a little low for the guy many thought was the Next Big Thing.
Either way, we went from a very affordable QB room to now one of the most expensive. This will hamstring late-season roster upgrades.
For those not understanding... a trade means we must honor the deal OTT had with him. We cannot renegotiate down, unless Dru is willing (why would he?).
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on June 23, 2026, 11:35:23 PMWhy now instead of the off-season?
Because Dinwiddie didn't know how bad he was until he got to work with him through a full camp. Dinwiddie likely thought he was their starter. What he saw was so bad that he decided to go with Maier and throw away every game until they got a real QB. Now, this might mean Dru is bad
for Dinwiddie, not that he's objectively bad. They might just not mesh.
Quote from: kkc60 on June 23, 2026, 11:37:57 PMcool you missed all my points. yay management!!
Cool so missed all my counter pts
Yay to unnecessary worry
Your points were fear based worry not worth countering
Digging deeper is harder than seeing the light provided by another party imo
Elgersma is part of the equation, has a good shot at starter and almost guarantee at backup. A 2nd rounder was extreme value.
This might accelerate his development as no pressure to do it from the start but can when ready, I like to slow roast my prospect, especially QBs, just like goalies
No risk, no cost other than one good cdn
Most will love this deal
Embrace it, its gold
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on June 23, 2026, 11:35:23 PMIt's a bit weird. How are we going to fit another $320,000 on the roster? What is happening to Perkins and Elgersma and the roster now? Is Zach okay? Why now instead of the off-season? The cost is less than I first thought. We gave up a first, but got our own second rounder back. That's not terrible. Wonder what the Bombers know that we don't. Elgersma happy? Not happy? What's the condition on the other 2028 pick? If he re-signs?
My understanding is that Brown already received 150,000 signing bonus in January to restructure his contract so the hit is more like 171,000. He also had an additional 54,000 in playtime incentives, but likley won't collect much of that, unless Zach is out for a lot of games, in which case we could 6 game Zach to recoup the money. Plus he's already played 2 games, which takes another 20,000 off the cost of his salary. Small price to pay for what we got in terms of salary IMO.
Quote from: kkc60 on June 23, 2026, 11:30:27 PMso then why did we spend a 2nd round pick on Elgersma? You're assuming Brown is cool with signing a one year deal, and assuming Elgersma is cool not having a shot to be the starter. He didn't even want to come here over the UFL for that exact reason.
Sure, it is nice having the depth and it very well could be a very big trade that pays off. But I think it's also a huge risk and replacing the potential impact of a first round pick with a "PR player" or trading another draft pick for a canadian (which seldom happens, and when it does it's for depth players mostly) is downplaying the cost
Dinwiddie was not the RedBlack's GM when we drafted Elgersma (2025). Dru (probably) was not available for trade at that time.
Quote from: TBURGESS on June 23, 2026, 11:32:57 PMSeems strange to me. Ottawa lost it's backup QB for a couple of draft picks? We added a big salary 2nd string QB on a 1 year contract. How is that future planning?
Ya, the MBT signing means we got r***d on this deal. OTT would have been willing to accept FAR less for Dru because their only goal was shedding him to make way for a QB they actually wanted. Heck, they may have just outright cut Dru had no team taken the bait.
OTT didn't want/need assets for Dru, they just wanted to shed the SMS!
KW will be kicking himself that he gave away a 1RDP when OTT would have probably taken a 3RDP, because their alternative was taking NOTHING. Only if another team out there was desperate for an iffy/unproven backup would we have been outbid.
As usual, Mafia is not cut-throat, greedy, or nasty enough. We play it so boy scout, and the vultures out there take advantage.
Quote from: bunker on June 23, 2026, 11:48:53 PMMy understanding is that Brown already received 150,000 signing bonus in January to restructure his contract so the hit is more like 171,000. He also had an additional 54,000 in playtime incentives, but likley won't collect much of that, unless Zach is out for a lot of games, in which case we could 6 game Zach to recoup the money. Plus he's already played 2 games, which takes another 20,000 off the cost of his salary. Small price to pay for what we got in terms of salary IMO.
This may be as low as 116k
9) Dru Brown, Ottawa Redblacks (A)
Hard money: $321,000
Maximum value: $387,000
Browns's 2026 compensation comes from a $150,000 signing bonus, $131,000 base salary, $15,000 in marketing money, $15,000 in housing, and a $10,000 travel allowance. He has an additional $66,000 available in playtime, statistical, all-star and award incentives.https://3downnation.com/2026/05/04/highest-paid-quarterbacks-for-2026-canadian-football-league-season/
Quote from: Tecno on June 23, 2026, 11:49:33 PMYa, the MBT signing means we got r***d on this deal. OTT would have been willing to accept FAR less for Dru because their only goal was shedding him to make way for a QB they actually wanted. Heck, they may have just outright cut Dru had no team taken the bait.
OTT didn't want/need assets for Dru, they just wanted to shed the SMS!
KW will be kicking himself that he gave away a 1RDP when OTT would have probably taken a 3RDP, because their alternative was taking NOTHING. Only if another team out there was desperate for an iffy/unproven backup would we have been outbid.
As usual, Mafia is not cut-throat, greedy, or nasty enough. We play it so boy scout, and the vultures out there take advantage.
It's easy to say that when now you know they signed MBT. Hindsight is 20/20.
IF they did not signed MBT, I don't think you will say the same.
Quote from: Tecno on June 23, 2026, 11:49:33 PMYa, the MBT signing means we got r***d on this deal. OTT would have been willing to accept FAR less for Dru because their only goal was shedding him to make way for a QB they actually wanted. Heck, they may have just outright cut Dru had no team taken the bait.
OTT didn't want/need assets for Dru, they just wanted to shed the SMS!
KW will be kicking himself that he gave away a 1RDP when OTT would have probably taken a 3RDP, because their alternative was taking NOTHING. Only if another team out there was desperate for an iffy/unproven backup would we have been outbid.
As usual, Mafia is not cut-throat, greedy, or nasty enough. We play it so boy scout, and the vultures out there take advantage.
Wut.. Why does signing a vet QB after the fact have any bearing on your impression of the trade one way or the other?
Quote from: M.O.A.B. on June 23, 2026, 11:53:02 PMIt's easy to say that when now you know they signed MBT.
They obviously had to sign a vet now that they traded away the back-up.
Quote from: tlf on June 23, 2026, 11:43:05 PMDo we have ANY guarantee Elgersma won't get hurt or like it here or be any good? He sure took his time getting here, and since I work in HR heck I'd have a backup plan to him too.
Well, we all knew going into the season that it was Zach or bust. Perkins and Elgersma wouldn't be winning any games as starter, because they are both too green.
Elgersma is like an Alexander project: give them 2-3 years to develop properly. If he's the next Rourke then the reins are his.
Dru is the "we have a fighting chance" QB we needed now
IF Zach were to get hurt. And I think we got the better deal vs signing MBT. If you believe we will need a backup for more than half a game this season, Dru is our best option. Myself, I would have thrown the dice at just keeping Zach in the game. But I'm a gambler... KW is not.
Quote from: bunker on June 23, 2026, 11:48:53 PMMy understanding is that Brown already received 150,000 signing bonus in January to restructure his contract so the hit is more like 171,000.
If we're under $200k SMS hit for Dru then I'm MUCH happier about things. Even though we got the 1RDP stolen from us on this "trade", I can live with that, as many here say, our 1RDPs are mostly mediocre picks anyway.
Quote from: Tecno on June 23, 2026, 11:56:08 PMIf we're under $200k SMS hit for Dru then I'm MUCH happier about things. Even though we got the 1RDP stolen from us on this "trade", I can live with that, as many here say, our 1RDPs are mostly mediocre picks anyway.
Lol. Stolen.
I guess it's not a bad swing. Trust the Bombers know the QB room better than we do and I suppose the very early read is we could go into next year with Brown, Elgersma and Perkins. That's a better hand than Elgersma, Perkins, someone new but it's still a bit interesting and it's definitely a gamble given that Dinwiddie knows QBs as well as anyone and Brown hasn't been able to stay healthy or do much since he's been gone.
Quote from: Jesse on June 23, 2026, 11:52:07 PMThis may be as low as 116k
9) Dru Brown, Ottawa Redblacks (A)
Hard money: $321,000
Maximum value: $387,000
Browns's 2026 compensation comes from a $150,000 signing bonus, $131,000 base salary, $15,000 in marketing money, $15,000 in housing, and a $10,000 travel allowance. He has an additional $66,000 available in playtime, statistical, all-star and award incentives.
https://3downnation.com/2026/05/04/highest-paid-quarterbacks-for-2026-canadian-football-league-season/
cheap like borscht
Quote from: Jesse on June 23, 2026, 11:52:07 PM$15,000 in marketing money
Oh noes! We're going to have to fake the MMM like every other team does! Mafia moral compass going haywire right about now.
::) ::) 8)
I wonder if the league has a way to just convert promised MMM into hard salary. Bet we take that out.
Vibert moved to PR. Could be Brown goes to the RR this week and Elgersma or Perkins goes after this week?
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on June 23, 2026, 11:57:03 PMI guess it's not a bad swing. Trust the Bombers know the QB room better than we do and I suppose the very early read is we could go into next year with Brown, Elgersma and Perkins. That's a better hand than Elgersma, Perkins, someone new but it's still a bit interesting and it's definitely a gamble given that Dinwiddie knows QBs as well as anyone and Brown hasn't been able to stay healthy or do much since he's been gone.
Very little gambled here
More like doubled down on insurance
Nice to see your tune changed lol
Quote from: Blueforlife on June 23, 2026, 11:58:43 PMVery little gambled here
More like doubled down on insurance
Nice to see your tune changed lol
Let's see what it costs us first, hey? And what Brown actually does when he gets here before we fall over ourselves and say it's the best deal ever. It's going to have roster implications, the current QB room is going to change, and even if Brown is mostly paid out he's still more expensive than either of our current backups so there's a delta of some kind.
Quote from: M.O.A.B. on June 23, 2026, 11:48:57 PMDinwiddie was not the RedBlack's GM when we drafted Elgersma (2025). Dru (probably) was not available for trade at that time.
Well said,agree
Quote from: Tecno on June 23, 2026, 11:49:33 PMYa, the MBT signing means we got r***d on this deal. OTT would have been willing to accept FAR less for Dru because their only goal was shedding him to make way for a QB they actually wanted. Heck, they may have just outright cut Dru had no team taken the bait.
OTT didn't want/need assets for Dru, they just wanted to shed the SMS!
KW will be kicking himself that he gave away a 1RDP when OTT would have probably taken a 3RDP, because their alternative was taking NOTHING. Only if another team out there was desperate for an iffy/unproven backup would we have been outbid.
As usual, Mafia is not cut-throat, greedy, or nasty enough. We play it so boy scout, and the vultures out there take advantage.
Nah way reasonable trade both ways
Mafia is good but yes they are not Murphy cutthroat and I think that's just fine with me
Quote from: M.O.A.B. on June 23, 2026, 11:53:02 PMIt's easy to say that when now you know they signed MBT. Hindsight is 20/20.
IF they did not signed MBT, I don't think you will say the same.
But OTT calls you up sniffing for an unexpected trade. Offers you their supposed #1 QB. Ya, you start smelling that miasma wafting your way from our nation's capital.
Your Bad-Tradar starts tingling. You hang up and brainstorm with your braintrust. You ask yourself, why is OTT doing this? Who could be on their radar? What are they trying to accomplish? Are they trying to do WFC a solid because they are Nice Folk?
I'd say most smart people suss it out. And to be honest, I bet we did... it's just that we don't care. We're so straight laced and play everything "fair". We're like "ya, we know you're desperate and will take 3RDP, but Dru is a great add for us right now so here, we'll give you a fair 1RDP". OTT is dog river. WPG is Woolerton.
Whatever, it's ok. There is more to life than wringing every last ounce of blood out of an opponent. However, the blood-wringers are the teams that seem to be winning the GC lately...
Quote from: Tecno on June 23, 2026, 11:57:54 PMOh noes! We're going to have to fake the MMM like every other team does! Mafia moral compass going haywire right about now.
::) ::) 8)
I wonder if the league has a way to just convert promised MMM into hard salary. Bet we take that out.
What are going on about now, every contract we have access to shows marketing money. Brady, White, Demski, Broxton, Holm, Nichols, etc.
Quote from: Tecno on June 23, 2026, 11:54:18 PMWell, we all knew going into the season that it was Zach or bust. Perkins and Elgersma wouldn't be winning any games as starter, because they are both too green.
Elgersma is like an Alexander project: give them 2-3 years to develop properly. If he's the next Rourke then the reins are his.
Dru is the "we have a fighting chance" QB we needed now IF Zach were to get hurt. And I think we got the better deal vs signing MBT. If you believe we will need a backup for more than half a game this season, Dru is our best option. Myself, I would have thrown the dice at just keeping Zach in the game. But I'm a gambler... KW is not.
MBT is awful. I'd 10x rather have Dru than him. I quite like the deal.
I was joking (joking people joking!!) with a friend that since we have Dru now if Elgersma could help out the D a bit and knock down passes on our D due to his height.
Onwards, nice to see Dru back. He'll play better when he's in an environment he's happier in.
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on June 24, 2026, 12:01:16 AMLet's see what it costs us first, hey? And what Brown actually does when he gets here before we fall over ourselves and say it's the best deal ever. It's going to have roster implications, the current QB room is going to change, and even if Brown is mostly paid out he's still more expensive than either of our current backups so there's a delta of some kind.
Nah you didn't like the deal I do
Its a good deal regardless imo
Nobody called it the best deal ever but thanks for the return to fantasy 🏝
Roster implications yes but whatever thems the dets
Brown will come cheap for what he is imo
We know what Brown is already
7th inning stretch anyone
Quote from: M.O.A.B. on June 23, 2026, 11:56:37 PMLol. Stolen.
Colloquialisms. When a 3rd party sees a deal between 2 other parties that is highly lopsided, one tends to say someone got "robbed". Robbed. Stolen. Whatever.
Surely you're not saying we couldn't have made a better deal? What other team was going to relieve OTT of Dru? EDM maybe? That's probably it.
Quote from: Tecno on June 24, 2026, 12:03:21 AMBut OTT calls you up sniffing for an unexpected trade. Offers you their supposed #1 QB. Ya, you start smelling that miasma wafting your way from our nation's capital.
Your Bad-Tradar starts tingling. You hang up and brainstorm with your braintrust. You ask yourself, why is OTT doing this? Who could be on their radar? What are they trying to accomplish? Are they trying to do WFC a solid because they are Nice Folk?
I'd say most smart people suss it out. And to be honest, I bet we did... it's just that we don't care. We're so straight laced and play everything "fair". We're like "ya, we know you're desperate and will take 3RDP, but Dru is a great add for us right now so here, we'll give you a fair 1RDP". OTT is dog river. WPG is Woolerton.
Whatever, it's ok. There is more to life than wringing every last ounce of blood out of an opponent. However, the blood-wringers are the teams that seem to be winning the GC lately...
Tinfoil on sale sounds like this week
Not buying it
I would have jumped
Quote from: Tecno on June 24, 2026, 12:03:21 AMBut OTT calls you up sniffing for an unexpected trade. Offers you their supposed #1 QB. Ya, you start smelling that miasma wafting your way from our nation's capital.
Your Bad-Tradar starts tingling. You hang up and brainstorm with your braintrust. You ask yourself, why is OTT doing this? Who could be on their radar? What are they trying to accomplish? Are they trying to do WFC a solid because they are Nice Folk?
I'd say most smart people suss it out. And to be honest, I bet we did... it's just that we don't care. We're so straight laced and play everything "fair". We're like "ya, we know you're desperate and will take 3RDP, but Dru is a great add for us right now so here, we'll give you a fair 1RDP". OTT is dog river. WPG is Woolerton.
Whatever, it's ok. There is more to life than wringing every last ounce of blood out of an opponent. However, the blood-wringers are the teams that seem to be winning the GC lately...
You make your decision based on what makes your team better. Not based on what other teams will do.
Quote from: Tecno on June 24, 2026, 12:03:21 AMBut OTT calls you up sniffing for an unexpected trade. Offers you their supposed #1 QB. Ya, you start smelling that miasma wafting your way from our nation's capital.
Your Bad-Tradar starts tingling. You hang up and brainstorm with your braintrust. You ask yourself, why is OTT doing this? Who could be on their radar? What are they trying to accomplish? Are they trying to do WFC a solid because they are Nice Folk?
I'd say most smart people suss it out. And to be honest, I bet we did... it's just that we don't care. We're so straight laced and play everything "fair". We're like "ya, we know you're desperate and will take 3RDP, but Dru is a great add for us right now so here, we'll give you a fair 1RDP". OTT is dog river. WPG is Woolerton.
Whatever, it's ok. There is more to life than wringing every last ounce of blood out of an opponent. However, the blood-wringers are the teams that seem to be winning the GC lately...
You have no idea what led up to our offer. Off the top of my head, neither Sask nor Calgary have much backing up their #1 QB, and VAJ is injury prone, and Harris is 40. I doubt Dinwiddie just called up Walters without checking out other team's interest, and the first round pick may have been what was necessary to obtain Drew.
Quote from: M.O.A.B. on June 24, 2026, 12:08:24 AMYou make your decision based on what makes your team better. Not based on what other teams will do.
Facts
Quote from: bunker on June 24, 2026, 12:08:43 AMYou have no idea what led up to our offer. Off the top of my head, neither Sask nor Calgary have much backing up their #1 QB, and VAJ is injury prone, and Harris is 40. I doubt Dinwiddie just called up Walters without checking out other team's interest, and the first round pick may have been what was necessary to obtain Drew.
Facts 2.0
Great insight both of you
Quote from: Blueforlife on June 24, 2026, 12:09:28 AMFacts
Facts 2.0
Great insight both of you
Mind your own business... just get business done. Period.
Quote from: tlf on June 24, 2026, 12:10:55 AMMind your own business... just get business done. Period.
Cleaver man well said
I might use that but don't tell my wife that one 🐵
Quote from: Jesse on June 24, 2026, 12:03:33 AMWhat are going on about now, every contract we have access to shows marketing money. Brady, White, Demski, Broxton, Holm, Nichols, etc.
I thought it was less people than that. I know Zach & Brady, that's it. And when we get the number it's always like $10k (maybe $20 for superstars). I seriously doubt Holm/Nichols are getting more than $5k MMM, if not outright $0.
And you can easily make a case for our top superstars getting MMM. How do you make a case for our backup QB? Is any backup QB (who wasn't anointed starter previously) getting MMM? I can't think of any. I'm sure Elgersma & Perkins aren't getting any, and neither did Wilson last season.
My main point still stands, we use MMM less than any other team, especially the MMM-"abusers" like BC. And you're missing my tongue-in-cheek -- I think we should be paying everyone league-max MMM. It's a SMS cheat code that we're too boy scout to
abuse like the teams that serious about winning.
Quote from: M.O.A.B. on June 24, 2026, 12:08:24 AMYou make your decision based on what makes your team better. Not based on what other teams will do.
That's first-order thinking. That's why we often lose. It's not just this trade, it's what we do on D and O. We are the chess player thinking 1 play ahead. The other team or coordinator is thinking 3.
It seems pervasive in the WFC culture. It goes hand in hand with their KISS. So how's that working out for us last year and this?
At least I gave KW/Mafia credit for having scruples! The alternative is that they are simpletons!
It's like when I watch for a whole year how teams learn to key on something we do, say an obvious route, and then they start jumping it and INTing us. And our reaction is just keep doing it, or ditch the play. Lapo, when here, would use it as bait to get the jumping DB burnt as there was a guy sneaking in behind him. 2nd, 3rd order thinking.
I'm actually hopeful we are getting back to that with high-brain Condell. He seems very much capable of higher order thinking. And I couldn't be happier. (Buck wasn't capable, either, and that's why I'm not too afraid of BC winning a cup.)
Quote from: Tecno on June 24, 2026, 12:12:55 AMI thought it was less people than that. I know Zach & Brady, that's it. And when we get the number it's always like $10k (maybe $20 for superstars). I seriously doubt Holm/Nichols are getting more than $5k MMM, if not outright $0.
And you can easily make a case for our top superstars getting MMM. How do you make a case for our backup QB? Is any backup QB (who wasn't anointed starter previously) getting MMM? I can't think of any. I'm sure Elgersma & Perkins aren't getting any, and neither did Wilson last season.
My main point still stands, we use MMM less than any other team, especially the MMM-"abusers" like BC. And you're missing my tongue-in-cheek -- I think we should be paying everyone league-max MMM. It's a SMS cheat code that we're too boy scout to abuse like the teams that serious about winning.
Only Rourke and Kelly have MM for over 100k. Virtually every other player on every other team is between 5-25k.
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on June 23, 2026, 11:57:03 PMgiven that Dinwiddie knows QBs as well as anyone and Brown hasn't been able to stay healthy or do much since he's been gone.
I recall Dru having 1, maybe 2 good games since leaving. He really hasn't done anything as a starter, and as you said, is always hurt.
Yes, it is disturbing Dinwiddie gave him the thumbs down. However, it could be a personality mismatch. Dru is like the anti-Dinwiddie. Dinwiddie is a hot-head firebrand. Dru is like the most chill guy ever.
For F1 fans, Dru is Kimi Raikonen. No emotion at all. Wins? Ok great. Loses? Ok great. Big TD, ok great. INT, ok great.
Zach isn't terribly emotive on the field, but man, Zach seems like a bundle of emotional energy compared to Dru!! At least Zach will give himself a little YES on a good TD.
Quote from: bunker on June 24, 2026, 12:08:43 AMYou have no idea what led up to our offer. Off the top of my head, neither Sask nor Calgary have much backing up their #1 QB, and VAJ is injury prone, and Harris is 40. I doubt Dinwiddie just called up Walters without checking out other team's interest, and the first round pick may have been what was necessary to obtain Drew.
Brown's agent would have been shopping him and I can't see any reason the Riders wouldn't be interested at that price, so Walters had to act fast or miss out. Dinwiddie must have had the deal with MBT in his pocket ready to go before he pulled the trigger on Brown. Obvious difference in personality between the 2, Dinwiddie probably couldn't ring enough fire out of Brown.
(https://media.tenor.com/CBgLHDlKl98AAAAC/wedding-season-owen-wilson.gif)
Quote from: Tecno on June 24, 2026, 12:12:55 AMI thought it was less people than that. I know Zach & Brady, that's it. And when we get the number it's always like $10k (maybe $20 for superstars). I seriously doubt Holm/Nichols are getting more than $5k MMM, if not outright $0.
And you can easily make a case for our top superstars getting MMM. How do you make a case for our backup QB? Is any backup QB (who wasn't anointed starter previously) getting MMM? I can't think of any. I'm sure Elgersma & Perkins aren't getting any, and neither did Wilson last season.
My main point still stands, we use MMM less than any other team, especially the MMM-"abusers" like BC. And you're missing my tongue-in-cheek -- I think we should be paying everyone league-max MMM. It's a SMS cheat code that we're too boy scout to abuse like the teams that serious about winning.
Easy solution for marketing money, "Welcome to Churchill Dru Brown, next up the Pas!".
Quote from: bunker on June 24, 2026, 12:08:43 AMYou have no idea what led up to our offer. Off the top of my head, neither Sask nor Calgary have much backing up their #1 QB, and VAJ is injury prone, and Harris is 40. I doubt Dinwiddie just called up Walters without checking out other team's interest, and the first round pick may have been what was necessary to obtain Drew.
Oh, I guarantee OTT shopped Dru around. They probably called everyone. Because you want a bidding war.
The thing is, clearly, no other team was willing to give up a 1RDP for him. Heck, we don't even know if another team was willing to give up a 2RDP, though that does seem possible.
We may even find out. Maybe. KW could have a conference and defend his high price by saying there was no other option on the table because of a bidding war. However, OTT could have just been playing us & lying. And like I said, if he thought it was fair, I can't see KW dickering on price.
As for SSK/CGY, ya, possible suitors. I think Dickenson The Greater would be a good fit. But I can't see Dru being popular in SSK and meshing with Mace.
Quote from: bunker on June 24, 2026, 12:08:43 AMYou have no idea what led up to our offer. Off the top of my head, neither Sask nor Calgary have much backing up their #1 QB, and VAJ is injury prone, and Harris is 40. I doubt Dinwiddie just called up Walters without checking out other team's interest, and the first round pick may have been what was necessary to obtain Drew.
Nah, that makes too much sense.
We were fleeced without any negotiation whatsoever. Because we're too nice.
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on June 23, 2026, 11:57:03 PMBrown hasn't been able to stay healthy or do much since he's been gone.
Healthy kept him from doing as well as could
Had some good games
Injuries a valid concern 100%, that's why he is cheap
Kinda like when we got Zach
Quote from: Jesse on June 24, 2026, 12:23:36 AMOnly Rourke and Kelly have MM for over 100k. Virtually every other player on every other team is between 5-25k.
Pretty sure most star QBs signed since Rourke's debacle have been getting $50k MMM. Like Alexander and Kelly? That seems to be the accepted "my name isn't Doman" value.
Quote from: Tecno on June 24, 2026, 12:27:42 AMI recall Dru having 1, maybe 2 good games since leaving. He really hasn't done anything as a starter, and as you said, is always hurt.
Yes, it is disturbing Dinwiddie gave him the thumbs down. However, it could be a personality mismatch. Dru is like the anti-Dinwiddie. Dinwiddie is a hot-head firebrand. Dru is like the most chill guy ever.
For F1 fans, Dru is Kimi Raikonen. No emotion at all. Wins? Ok great. Loses? Ok great. Big TD, ok great. INT, ok great.
Zach isn't terribly emotive on the field, but man, Zach seems like a bundle of emotional energy compared to Dru!! At least Zach will give himself a little YES on a good TD.
More good games that that
Couple decent years more like lol
2024
OTT 17 312 464 3959 18 10 8.5
2025
OTT 11 196 274 2389 14 10 8.7
Quote from: Blueforlife on June 24, 2026, 12:34:59 AMKinda like when we got Zach
It would be so hilarious if Dru takes us to the cup this year and becomes the next Zach-level superstar for the next 5+ seasons. LOL, just like 2019. Other teams' fans would go mental. (I won't put money on it, though!)
Quote from: Tecno on June 24, 2026, 12:37:29 AMIt would be so hilarious if Dru takes us to the cup this year and becomes the next Zach-level superstar for the next 5+ seasons. LOL, just like 2019. Other teams' fans would go mental. (I won't put money on it, though!)
Mo money mo problems
Nah they will get even more angry when our young stud makes it 15 lol
Bring on another mini dynasty lo
That is pretty funny though but we need a guy in a brown fur coat to make this legit
Quote from: Blueforlife on June 24, 2026, 12:36:58 AMMore good games that that
Couple decent years more like lol
OTT record W/L 10-13-1
Strevie had a better record... and he couldn't throw.
Quote from: Tecno on June 24, 2026, 12:38:53 AMOTT record W/L 10-13-1
Strevie had a better record... and he couldn't throw.
That record be opposite on most teams
Ottawa can't play lol
Strev would have had minus wins with ott
Ps.I love.Strev and he could throw.kinda sometimes
Quote from: Jesse on June 24, 2026, 12:33:29 AMNah, that makes too much sense.
We were fleeced without any negotiation whatsoever. Because we're too nice.
Name one time we reamed another team on a trade. Now think about all the times we were sitting there breathing in noisily shaking our head at the steep price we paid for someone.
The Zach trade doesn't count. EVERYONE thought his brain was scrambled and he would never last 1 game again in his life.
Other than that, no one ever looks at Mafia trades and says "oh ya, WPG got away with one that time!". But it's fine. I'm not even that much against it. I just think we might do better overall if we were more cut-throat. Certainly might be worth a try?
Quote from: Blueforlife on June 24, 2026, 12:40:43 AMThat record be opposite on most teams
Ottawa can't play lol
Strev would have had minus wins with ott
Well, was it Dru or was it OTT? We'll never know. Ya, we can be 99% sure, but hey, you never know.
On the flipside, we could also don't know if Dru was ever good. Keep in mind he was lighting it up here during our peak dynasty years. Remember Jennings in BC, Franklin in EDM(?), Arbuckle in CGY. All looked like the next Ricky Ray. All fizzled out. We have to accept Dru might be one of those... in fact it seems the most likely. And that might be ok as all we need is a good backup.
P.S. I love Strevie too, and I never cared he "couldn't throw"... but the fact remains.
Overall I like the move. Especially if it's under $200k, or even under $150k. Mafia always likes to have a .500 backup QB in the house. We didn't have that before this trade. He knows the WPG system. He knows the Condell system. He's actually perfect from a slot-right-in standpoint. Heck, he could be #2 on Thursday.
Forget about the future. Dru was traded for the here and now. This doesn't impact Elgersma at all. Just sit him down and explain that to him. They probably already did. Elgersma can go RR and earn his full salary. Perkins has won the SY spot (100%! nay 110%!). If Dru gets 1.5 games this season and lights it up, then we can examine him being a possible heir. It's not outside the realm of possibility.
There is a cost, though. 1RDP means our OL pipeline will get even more bare. And it was already VERY VERY bare. This may lock us into 3 IMP OL for 2-3 seasons! We are also heavily gambling on the 2 down-south DPs ever coming up here. We are basically in OL Hades, as far as CFL rosters go.
In essence we're trading a future gamble at OL for QB certainty today. I'm fine with that. I've been begging for an IMP C for since Couture left. My wish has come true, and probably for the next 3 seasons.
Now let's go out and WIN!
Quote from: Tecno on June 24, 2026, 12:41:51 AMName one time we reamed another team on a trade. Now think about all the times we were sitting there breathing in noisily shaking our head at the steep price we paid for someone.
The Zach trade doesn't count. EVERYONE thought his brain was scrambled and he would never last 1 game again in his life.
Other than that, no one ever looks at Mafia trades and says "oh ya, WPG got away with one that time!". But it's fine. I'm not even that much against it. I just think we might do better overall if we were more cut-throat. Certainly might be worth a try?
It's been awhile since the Bombers made deals with anyone other than Hamilton.
Quote from: Tecno on June 24, 2026, 12:46:01 AMWell, was it Dru or was it OTT? We'll never know. Ya, we can be 99% sure, but hey, you never know.
On the flipside, we could also don't know if Dru was ever good. Keep in mind he was lighting it up here during our peak dynasty years. Remember Jennings in BC, Franklin in EDM(?), Arbuckle in CGY. All looked like the next Ricky Ray. All fizzled out. We have to accept Dru might be one of those... in fact it seems the most likely. And that might be ok as all we need is a good backup.
P.S. I love Strevie too, and I never cared he "couldn't throw"... but the fact remains.
90% ott
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on June 24, 2026, 12:57:47 AMIt's been awhile since the Bombers made deals with anyone other than Hamilton.
It seems like most seasons lately we're making trades
in the draft. Weird ones that leave people shaking their heads. Hey, like this trade!
But yes, other than draft trades, trades are pretty rare in the CFL overall. I think last season's trade deadline saw zero trades.
Quote from: Tecno on June 24, 2026, 12:33:07 AMOh, I guarantee OTT shopped Dru around. They probably called everyone. Because you want a bidding war.
The thing is, clearly, no other team was willing to give up a 1RDP for him. Heck, we don't even know if another team was willing to give up a 2RDP, though that does seem possible.
We may even find out. Maybe. KW could have a conference and defend his high price by saying there was no other option on the table because of a bidding war. However, OTT could have just been playing us & lying. And like I said, if he thought it was fair, I can't see KW dickering on price.
As for SSK/CGY, ya, possible suitors. I think Dickenson The Greater would be a good fit. But I can't see Dru being popular in SSK and meshing with Mace.
I bet Dru would be happy to go to Sask. to back up Harris, good shot at playoff money, shorter time to succession and if he can pick up on TH's quick passing game, he'll find success and stay healthy for longer than he would imitating Zach. I doubt Mace has much to do with the QB room as long as it's working well.
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on June 24, 2026, 12:57:47 AMIt's been awhile since the Bombers made deals with anyone other than Hamilton.
CFL trades just don't happen all that often.
Excited to see this. I was one of the few who wanted to keep Dru Brown over Collaros before he left for Ottawa. Brown has been out with injuries and concussions while he was a Redblack. Every one reacts differently to hits on the noggin, but he did seem to slow down at a certain point. You wonder if he is processing things as quickly as when he was in Winnipeg the last time. Condell should know. So you have to see this trade as a positive and that the club believes he will be able to step in and produce this year.
Quote from: Jesse on June 23, 2026, 10:47:51 PMThat probably isn't the main reason he's here. We don't have a back-up plan and the FA QBs were garbage so we kinda had to put Elgersma in that role which he completely isn't ready for.
Based on what is Elgersma not ready? He can make all the throws, read a 12 man defense, is accurate.
Quote from: Tecno on June 24, 2026, 12:41:51 AMName one time we reamed another team on a trade. Now think about all the times we were sitting there breathing in noisily shaking our head at the steep price we paid for someone.
The Zach trade doesn't count. EVERYONE thought his brain was scrambled and he would never last 1 game again in his life.
Other than that, no one ever looks at Mafia trades and says "oh ya, WPG got away with one that time!". But it's fine. I'm not even that much against it. I just think we might do better overall if we were more cut-throat. Certainly might be worth a try?
We got Matt Nichols for a conditional 7th round pick
I suggested earlier that Brown would get traded to dump SMS possibly and to avoid being bumped to back up. That said I don't know I thought he'd be traded to the Bombers.
More than likely he ends up on the reserve list this week and maybe for a few more weeks. Part of the trade is conditional but would we be surprised if his deal is being re-negotiated and that we were able to speak with him prior to the trade.
Overall I think this is a positive move in both short and long term. Any injury to Collaros and we'd have rookies becoming our # 1 QB.
So. Welcome back Dru.
Quote from: CrazyCanuck89 on June 24, 2026, 01:21:39 AMBased on what is Elgersma not ready? He can make all the throws, read a 12 man defense, is accurate.
Based on being a rookie and not rushing a young guy in his first professional season.
It's not a shot against the kid, but in an ideal world you have a vet back-up and develop your prospect. This gives us that opportunity.
Quote from: CrazyCanuck89 on June 24, 2026, 01:21:39 AMBased on what is Elgersma not ready? He can make all the throws, read a 12 man defense, is accurate.
Not experienced CFL player. He could be great or take significant time to be ready.
Quote from: bunker on June 24, 2026, 01:24:55 AMWe got Matt Nichols for a conditional 7th round pick
Fair cop. Good example. Except kind of proves the point because that was, I think, 2015 -- a long time ago.
Now THAT'S the kind of trade we should have been making for Dru! Holy smokes. KW should get out the ol' photo album and see how he used to ream other teams in trades!
Now you're making me think we could have gotten Dru for just a 3RDP. Stop depressing me! ;)
Here's a theory for you: Dinwiddie wants Kelly and knows somehow he'll get him. Probably conspiring with him on the down-low ever since leaving for OTT. No idea how they'll finagle it without Kelly sabotaging the season.
Dinwiddie & Kelly are a match made in heaven (or.. the other place).
MBT is to put lipstick on this throwaway "rebuild" year. Feel sorry for the OTT STHs that bother to show up every other week. On the bright side, all of us who said Maier won't win anything were just proven right. Perennial mediocre backup, that's what he's good for (and I mean that sincerely -- he's not completely useless).
The next question will be does Maier remain in OTT after this all shakes out or is he back to SSK or wherever. OTT still needs a backup, and I don't think MBT will be it in 2027.
I like the trade as it help us this season.
I wasn't a fan of losing Dru, but had moved on.
I know Ottawa wasn't a good team, or well coached, and Dru might not have been able to show his true abilities there, but I'm not sure he is the "heir apparent" still.
I like what our QB room has been so far this year. I was quite happy to go forward with the group.
I'm not sure what this does to that dynamic. Are we relegating one to the PR (probably get scooped)? Does one accept a stint on the IR? Do we release one?
Decisions will made, I guess we will find out if they were correct.
Quote from: theaardvark on June 24, 2026, 02:51:12 AMI'm not sure what this does to that dynamic. Are we relegating one to the PR (probably get scooped)? Does one accept a stint on the IR? Do we release one?
Elgersma can sit on RR: still practice, develop, get paid. PR would be fine too, as the mythical dreaded "scoop" never happens in real life. But since we have used 0 or 1 RR spot each week (like many teams!), it's sitting right there screaming to be utilized.
Quote from: CrazyCanuck89 on June 24, 2026, 01:21:39 AMBased on what is Elgersma not ready? He can make all the throws, read a 12 man defense, is accurate.
Based on PS he is not ready like 90% of other QBs with his experience
whats interesting as well. Brown signed a 321000 contract (388 with playtime incentives)
but 150000 of that was in bonus money... so we will only be on the hook for 171000 less two game so 133-140k. Not bad for a qb of his caliber
Quote from: Pete on June 24, 2026, 03:32:02 AMwhats interesting as well. Brown signed a 321000 contract (388 with playtime incentives)
but 150000 of that was in bonus money... so we will only be on the hook for 171000 less two game so 133-140k. Not bad for a qb of his caliber
Jesse posted the numbers at the bottom of page 3 of this thread if you wish to look.
Quote from: Pete on June 24, 2026, 03:32:02 AMwhats interesting as well. Brown signed a 321000 contract (388 with playtime incentives)
but 150000 of that was in bonus money... so we will only be on the hook for 171000 less two game so 133-140k. Not bad for a qb of his caliber
Good salary for this season, bad for next unless Zach retires or accepts a drastic chop. A QB room of Brown, Elgersma and Perkins could be decent going forward with the hope Elgersma someday becomes an elite QB.
Brown left Winnipeg to be a starting QB. He might be okay backing Zach up this season, but next year mite be a different story. Maybe the Bombers know ZC8 is playing his last season and are just being proactive?
I wouldn't read anything at all into this move beyond this season. However, if Zach quits for 2027, it puts our foot in the door to avoid being left without a chair when the music stops.
Dru's not ideal as starter, but he's probably better than year 1 through 2 Elgersma. And it none of this precludes us making a huge FA splash going after a top-5 QB.
Brown had some strong games with Winnipeg and with Ottawa. Enough that he looked like starter material. He had a tough year injury-wise in Ottawa, but you would've thought Ottawa would stick with him as a starter again this year. They certainly don't have anybody better. A bit of a head scratcher how it all kind of went downhill for him in Ottawa. I don't think it was all Dinwiddie either. Perhaps the players and/or the organization had an issue with his leadership. I don't know, but it had to be something we didn't see from the outside.
Whatever. Brown does add lot of needed depth at the most important position. No doubt about that. Green or not though, Elgersma and Perkins are for sure going to be disappointed and maybe feel a little betrayed as well. Especially Elgersma. It did look like the Bombers were committed to going in his direction in the not to distant future. That must have played a significant role in him signing here. This move now casts doubt on that. Them trading for a vet qb was not on his radar screen. Obviously, he has all the tools to be a very successful CFL quarterback. Sometimes an organization just has to stick with a plan when it comes to finding it's next franchise quarterback. Was this maybe the time to do that? I'm not saying they shouldn't have done this, but yeah maybe I'm not as silly giddy as some others, because I'm a little concerned about how this move might upset the harmony of the team.
Considering all that, it does appear to be a good trade for the Bombers, for this year anyway. But a bold and maybe risky one for the future as well. We'll see how it all unfolds.
Interesting dynamic in this chat.
I'm a fan of the move. It's been years since we've had actual succession planning at QB, and given that in the first two games of the season I'd say Zach has lost a bit distance on the ball (not saying he can't throw, but the long ball is deteriorating), the time to setup for the future is now. Well mentored Brown/Elgersma/Perkins has the potential to be really, really good.
The first thing that came to mind with this was the Argos with Ray/Collaros/Harris. That turned out pretty well, be nice if we could do similar.
For sub 200K, fantastic. The MBT thing is curious though.
For those that didn't watch every game, nor read my commentary on OTT game thread :
There was a strange point in the OTT game where it was hopeless and dinwiddie pulled maier. So dru was coming on, right? He was charted as #2.
Nope, dinwiddie put in some noname rookie.
That could be the moment it all fell apart. Dru might have reacted poorly. He looked pretty nonplussed on the sidelines. Tsn made sure to get some good shots of him being dissed.
Maybe dru asked for his release. Or maybe this was dinwiddie setting dru up to be happy with being traded into an environment where he's guaranteed to be just a backup this year. What transpired with this trade may have been put in motion at that moment.
Quote from: kkc60 on June 23, 2026, 11:02:25 PMunnecessary and bad trade. succession plan, sure. but a 1st? with few quality canadians already? on a one year deal?? man I wish I had KW ego. Although I didn't realize at first the second is conditional. I guess we will see but at first glance, this pick looks closer to 2nd overall than 9th
Ottawa will be last this season and have the 10th pick (1st of round 2). The Bombers get that pick but lose their first (which could be anywhere from say 9th - 5th). Not that big of a deal dropping a few spots.
Quote from: Tecno on June 24, 2026, 02:55:42 AMElgersma can sit on RR: still practice, develop, get paid. PR would be fine too, as the mythical dreaded "scoop" never happens in real life. But since we have used 0 or 1 RR spot each week (like many teams!), it's sitting right there screaming to be utilized.
I think Brown will go to the RR for a couple of weeks until he learns the playbook. Then Elgersma will be switched out.
Teams must have had some sort of budget to add 2 players to the RR but few seem to be using it yet. That " budget " will come into play now. Also we haven't lost many man days on the 1 game IR due to using the 6 game IR. That may change if some are pulled off early but that's all TBD.
So we've been saving a few SMS $$ so far. I don't see the SMS hit by adding Brown to be an issue.
Quote from: Blue In BC on June 24, 2026, 01:27:14 AMNot experienced CFL player. He could be great or take significant time to be ready.
Who cares? Other teams have gone with rookie backups in the past.
Quote from: Pigskin on June 24, 2026, 04:28:49 AMBrown left Winnipeg to be a starting QB. He might be okay backing Zach up this season, but next year mite be a different story. Maybe the Bombers know ZC8 is playing his last season and are just being proactive?
This was my thinking when I saw the trade last night. I have to imagine Brown factors in to a succession plan of sorts, and I wonder if Collaros intends to call it a career after this season.
Time will tell what happens, but the addition of Brown helps the QB situation going forward, IMO.
Quote from: CrazyCanuck89 on June 24, 2026, 01:06:43 PMWho cares? Other teams have gone with rookie backups in the past.
That doesn't mean it's the right play, though. Letting Elgersma develop without undue pressure should help him.
Quote from: jdrattops on June 24, 2026, 12:43:28 PMOttawa will be last this season and have the 10th pick (1st of round 2). The Bombers get that pick but lose their first (which could be anywhere from say 9th - 5th). Not that big of a deal dropping a few spots.
We get back our second round pick that we traded them at the draft. So we may be picking towards the middle, end of the second round next year depending on how we do. It's not the end of the world but different than the above.
Quote from: jdrattops on June 24, 2026, 12:43:28 PMOttawa will be last this season and have the 10th pick (1st of round 2). The Bombers get that pick but lose their first (which could be anywhere from say 9th - 5th). Not that big of a deal dropping a few spots.
Bu
Quote from: jdrattops on June 24, 2026, 12:43:28 PMOttawa will be last this season and have the 10th pick (1st of round 2). The Bombers get that pick but lose their first (which could be anywhere from say 9th - 5th). Not that big of a deal dropping a few spots.
I hope it's anywhere from 5th-9th. But looking at the quality of the league (really outside of Ottawa and
maybe BC) The pick could be 3 or 4. Again, we won't know. It's just a risk. As well, the 2nd we got back is our own in the Daniels trade-up, not Ottawa's. So really the better quality the second round pick is, the worse the trade is.
But again, I'm just not a big fan of dealing first-round picks when you don't know where they will land (and with no conditions)
Quote from: Tecno on June 24, 2026, 10:01:50 AMFor those that didn't watch every game, nor read my commentary on OTT game thread :
There was a strange point in the OTT game where it was hopeless and dinwiddie pulled maier. So dru was coming on, right? He was charted as #2.
Nope, dinwiddie put in some noname rookie.
That could be the moment it all fell apart. Dru might have reacted poorly. He looked pretty nonplussed on the sidelines. Tsn made sure to get some good shots of him being dissed.
Maybe dru asked for his release. Or maybe this was dinwiddie setting dru up to be happy with being traded into an environment where he's guaranteed to be just a backup this year. What transpired with this trade may have been put in motion at that moment.
I thought that was odd also. Suggests Dru was not in Ottawa's future plans at that point. Maybe trade talks were already ongoing and Ottawa didn't want a Brown injury ruining it all.
Regarding Elgersma, let him earn the starting job over time by competing for it and showing he's better than the veterans in front of him. If he's as good as everyone thinks, he'll get slotted into the #2 slot, possibly as early as next year. Once that happens he'll almost certainly get a chance to play and show what he's got due to the high likelihood of the starting QB spending some time out with injury. And he'll be more likely to have success with a year of learning the position under his belt. The most intriguing player in town is always the untested back up QB with potential. Most, unfortunately, turn out to be disappointments. TE may be different, but if he really is that good, he'll get his chance.
Thoughts:
Maybe Condell wanted Brown. they worked together in Ottawa
Maybe Bombers have wanted this trade since Dinwiddie was hired and came out luke warm on Brown as starter
Perkins is odd man out. 3rd down is easiest to replace by far.
The concussions are not good but you know who else had issues? Collaros, Harris. 3 Grey Cups there.
Quote from: bunker on June 24, 2026, 02:05:11 PMI thought that was odd also. Suggests Dru was not in Ottawa's future plans at that point. Maybe trade talks were already ongoing and Ottawa didn't want a Brown injury ruining it all.
Dinwiddie also cut QB Max Duggan and added Nicholas Vattiato shortly after to take his place, so it looks like he's in the process of a total reorganization. I'm not sure the Ottawa fans can stomach a rebuild, but that's what they're getting.
Quote from: bomb squad on June 24, 2026, 06:34:05 AMBrown had some strong games with Winnipeg and with Ottawa. Enough that he looked like starter material. He had a tough year injury-wise in Ottawa, but you would've thought Ottawa would stick with him as a starter again this year. They certainly don't have anybody better. A bit of a head scratcher how it all kind of went downhill for him in Ottawa. I don't think it was all Dinwiddie either. Perhaps the players and/or the organization had an issue with his leadership. I don't know, but it had to be something we didn't see from the outside.
Whatever. Brown does add lot of needed depth at the most important position. No doubt about that. Green or not though, Elgersma and Perkins are for sure going to be disappointed and maybe feel a little betrayed as well. Especially Elgersma. It did look like the Bombers were committed to going in his direction in the not to distant future. That must have played a significant role in him signing here. This move now casts doubt on that. Them trading for a vet qb was not on his radar screen. Obviously, he has all the tools to be a very successful CFL quarterback. Sometimes an organization just has to stick with a plan when it comes to finding it's next franchise quarterback. Was this maybe the time to do that? I'm not saying they shouldn't have done this, but yeah maybe I'm not as silly giddy as some others, because I'm a little concerned about how this move might upset the harmony of the team.
Considering all that, it does appear to be a good trade for the Bombers, for this year anyway. But a bold and maybe risky one for the future as well. We'll see how it all unfolds.
Well...anyone think Zach is capable of winning a GC this season? Will he get better next season? If not what's the point of sticking with him for another year as his skills deteriorate?
As for Elgersma, at some point in the next 2-3 seasons he has to demonstrate he's a better option than Dru Brown if he wants the starting QB job, hopefully O'Shea comprehends the days of Zach will soon be over and and provides him with the opportunity to play, which is questionable he would unless injury intervenes. Elgersma either accepts the challenge with patience or he goes back to the NFL to stand in line forever or discovers the joy of finding a job in the real world, he has little choice.
I'm happy to have Brown as our #2 QB, but let's not make him into something he isn't. He was the worst starting QB in the league last year and lost his job to Jake Maier this year. He's like a lot of backups who, when they get their chance, don't live up to the hype.
Quote from: TBURGESS on June 24, 2026, 03:12:22 PMI'm happy to have Brown as our #2 QB, but let's not make him into something he isn't. He was the worst starting QB in the league last year and lost his job to Jake Maier this year. He's like a lot of backups who, when they get their chance, don't live up to the hype.
some truth to the above - he has played enough games to show what he is - injuries have impacted him so he gets a bit of a pause but this chance is basically it for him. He is the just good enough QB to make you believe but not good enough to win consistently...there have been 00's before him and 00's to some.
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on June 24, 2026, 02:52:01 PMWell...anyone think Zach is capable of winning a GC this season? Will he get better next season? If not what's the point of sticking with him for another year as his skills deteriorate?
As for Elgersma, at some point in the next 2-3 seasons he has to demonstrate he's a better option than Dru Brown if he wants the starting QB job, hopefully O'Shea comprehends the days of Zach will soon be over and and provides him with the opportunity to play, which is questionable he would unless injury intervenes. Elgersma either accepts the challenge with patience or he goes back to the NFL to stand in line forever or discovers the joy of finding a job in the real world, he has little choice.
30 to 50% chance Zach can win a cup this year imo. That goes down slightly next year. He still is very good imo. Stick with him until option 2 is > option 1. Stick with him so we have time to pass the torch.
Quote from: TBURGESS on June 24, 2026, 03:12:22 PMI'm happy to have Brown as our #2 QB, but let's not make him into something he isn't. He was the worst starting QB in the league last year and lost his job to Jake Maier this year. He's like a lot of backups who, when they get their chance, don't live up to the hype.
The Redblacks were a dumpster fire last season and they weren't much better in 2024. Despite that, Brown still posted respectable numbers during his time there: 28 GP, 508 completions against 738 attempts (68.8%), 6348 yards, 32 TDs, 20 INTs - good for a 98.45 QB rating (better than Collaros' 96.18 QBR through 31 games in 2024 and 2025).
I don't think your assessment of Brown is fair or reasonable. His struggles with the RedBlacks didn't exist in a vacuum as evidenced by the team's abysmal record during his time there.
And I guess Maier "stole his job," but that seems more like a shortsighted decision by Dinwiddie. Maier's been bad enough so far that Bethel-Thompson had to be airlifted in, anyway. The RedBlacks are not a good team right now.
Quote from: TBURGESS on June 24, 2026, 03:12:22 PMI'm happy to have Brown as our #2 QB, but let's not make him into something he isn't. He was the worst starting QB in the league last year and lost his job to Jake Maier this year. He's like a lot of backups who, when they get their chance, don't live up to the hype.
He may have been "the worst" QB in the league, but was his team/coaching better than anyone in the league?
This is an enigma for me, Perkins vs. Brown. Elgersma is here to stay, QB3 until he moves up. But QB2... Perkins has more "pedigree" but far less 3 down experience. Does he accept a PR spot? We have no idea Perkins upside. He's done all that he has been asked to. Will that continue?
I'm not unhappy with the QB room of Zach, Dru and Taylor. Perkins probably came here thinking he could fight for Zach's job. If released, he would probably get picked up elsewhere and be able to fight for a spot, but with no where near the chance of getting a starters job that would have been ahead of him when he originally signed here. Having Taylor inserted into the room, and now Dru, his prospects have unfortunately really dropped.
Quote from: theaardvark on June 24, 2026, 05:09:15 PMHe may have been "the worst" QB in the league, but was his team/coaching better than anyone in the league?
This is an enigma for me, Perkins vs. Brown. Elgersma is here to stay, QB3 until he moves up. But QB2... Perkins has more "pedigree" but far less 3 down experience. Does he accept a PR spot? We have no idea Perkins upside. He's done all that he has been asked to. Will that continue?
I'm not unhappy with the QB room of Zach, Dru and Taylor. Perkins probably came here thinking he could fight for Zach's job. If released, he would probably get picked up elsewhere and be able to fight for a spot, but with no where near the chance of getting a starters job that would have been ahead of him when he originally signed here. Having Taylor inserted into the room, and now Dru, his prospects have unfortunately really dropped.
It's not unusual for a team to carry 4 QB's Bombers did it last season, it's just a matter of roster and budget management, no reason to cut Perkins as he's been excellent as the SY QB.
Brown trade solves problems for Bombers and Redblacks (https://www.tsn.ca/cfl/article/brown-trade-solves-problems-for-bombers-and-redblacks/)
An informative read by Naylor on the trade.
And it seems to have worked out for both teams.
Turns out Brown asked for his release after Dinwiddie chose Maier as the starter.
https://3downnation.com/2026/06/24/ryan-dinwiddie-dru-brown-became-little-bit-of-a-distraction-for-ottawa-redblacks/ (https://3downnation.com/2026/06/24/ryan-dinwiddie-dru-brown-became-little-bit-of-a-distraction-for-ottawa-redblacks/)
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on June 24, 2026, 02:52:01 PMWell...anyone think Zach is capable of winning a GC this season? Will he get better next season? If not what's the point of sticking with him for another year as his skills deteriorate?
I do. If T.Harris, Arbuckle, and Cody can win it, then Zach more than can.
Zach pros:
- making great reads
- great zone hole dropper
- nice touch / easily catchable
- not throwing bad INTs (yet?)
Zach cons:
- slow wind-up
- slow "no zip" balls
- low escapability
- gets injured
- doesn't "look off" DBs
- ~50Y effective range
The one that's killing us currently is the "no zip" problem. It gives every DB/LB time to get to the target, and doubly especially seeing as how most of our game is the sit-down game, not the catch-in-stride game.
Can we work around the no-zip problem? Is there solutions? Throw earlier? Get some wizard trainer to fix it? T.Harris doesn't have much zip either, and SSK has made it work -- but they do a lot more in-stride and timing passes. Maybe that's the answer...
Quote from: Waffler on June 24, 2026, 02:27:24 PMPerkins is odd man out. 3rd down is easiest to replace by far.
Disagree. Perkins is good sneak body type and a ball of beef. And he's 100% and seems dedicated. You don't mess with what's working.
Elgersma was never here to be groomed as SY. He's being groomed as future Rourke. Sure, if he could do SY that would be gravy. But it's not his purpose. His job in the 1st 3 games was to come in and take over if Zach gets hurt. Period.
Now we have Dru who is totally the better choice to have that exact job description. And so Dru gets the #2 AR spot. Perkins stays at SY. And Elgersma gets to be the heir apparent putting in his 2-3 seasons of normal CFL dev...
on the RR or PR.
I'll eat a whole Walby burger in one sitting if they yank Perkins from SY and put in Elgersma.
Quote from: CrazyCanuck89 on June 24, 2026, 01:06:43 PMWho cares? Other teams have gone with rookie backups in the past.
And what's their combined record? Who's the last year-1 rookie to come for injury replacement in and go above .500? I think it's Strev -- who came in week 1 year 1! (Yowsers)
Remember, even Alexander had years of dev before playing. The only other one I can think of is Kelly who stepped in for his first game in the infamous GC and won himself a starting spot. And that was after a full year of dev and major high-expectations dev time down south.
We all know if Perkins or Elgersma had to start tomorrow the odds of it going Really Badly(TM) is near 100%. Not their fault, per se, it's just par for the course at that position.
Quote from: Blue In BC on June 24, 2026, 12:54:14 PMTeams must have had some sort of budget to add 2 players to the RR but few seem to be using it yet. That " budget " will come into play now.
I don't get that impression. The fact half the teams are using 0 or 1 RR spot only means that it's just added SMS baggage that draws away from the money you can actually put on the field.
If there was a separate league-mandated RR "budget" or "minimum" we probably would have heard about it.
Now, I think the league should mandate both RR spots be filled. Otherwise, what's the point?? I had thought when I first heard about it that the RR was going to be mandated to be full -- because otherwise it's just a glorified 1GIR. League could easily say: 2 RR spots must be filled and
minimum spend for each spot is ELC. After all, we all do want the CFL to have bigger rosters.
Now, because 1GIR's do tend to be filled more towards mid/late season, maybe we'll finally see them getting used that way.
Maybe someone can do a quick survey of the RR usage to see if it's mostly being used right now for nicked guys (in place of 1G) or if it's truly for guys who are just that 1 step away from making the AR.
Quote from: Tecno on June 25, 2026, 03:07:50 AMI don't get that impression. The fact half the teams are using 0 or 1 RR spot only means that it's just added SMS baggage that draws away from the money you can actually put on the field.
If there was a separate league-mandated RR "budget" or "minimum" we probably would have heard about it.
Now, I think the league should mandate both RR spots be filled. Otherwise, what's the point?? I had thought when I first heard about it that the RR was going to be mandated to be full -- because otherwise it's just a glorified 1GIR. League could easily say: 2 RR spots must be filled and minimum spend for each spot is ELC. After all, we all do want the CFL to have bigger rosters.
Now, because 1GIR's do tend to be filled more towards mid/late season, maybe we'll finally see them getting used that way.
Why there isn't a mandate to fill the RR is strange to say the least.
Maybe someone can do a quick survey of the RR usage to see if it's mostly being used right now for nicked guys (in place of 1G) or if it's truly for guys who are just that 1 step away from making the AR.
You can't potentially add 2 more players to the roster ( full pay ) without some accommodation in the budget planning.
Quote from: Blue In BC on June 25, 2026, 03:12:47 AMYou can't potentially add 2 more players to the roster ( full pay ) without some accommodation in the budget planning.
Uh, they've upped SMS by like $600k over the last 2-ish seasons (total)... there's your accommodation.
Quote from: Tecno on June 25, 2026, 03:36:20 AMUh, they've upped SMS by like $600k over the last 2-ish seasons (total)... there's your accommodation.
Fffacts of life, good for the league that they did
I'll be surprised If Dinwiddie can have success with Maier...
But I thought Bo was finished when he went to Hamilton.
Difference is Bo was good, and declined, Maier has not been a successful qb.
Interesting to follow.
Quote from: Tecno on June 25, 2026, 03:36:20 AMUh, they've upped SMS by like $600k over the last 2-ish seasons (total)... there's your accommodation.
Yes but you have to plan the spend against the SMS whether it goes up or not. If they change the possible number of players on the roster that has to be taken into account.
The confusing part is why doesn't the reserve not have some sort of mandatory aspect? At some point I expect teams to start adding players to the reserve.
In the case of the Bombers we just moved Vanterpool to the reserve. It's almost certain that we'll see a QB parked on the reserve by next week.
You can't possibly think that teams won't have some sort of plan on how they will use that reserve.
It's no different than having a budget expectation for 1 game IR issues. Moving everyone to 6 game IR doesn't change that concept. Some of the players will be moved off 6 game IR early and costs will be charged against the SMS.
It appears than short of Kelly, Rourke and Davis, Dinwiddie prefers a contol, game manager type of qb. Brown isn't that he fits more in The gunslinger mode. mode which is more suited to Condell
I was trying to find out what Maier's winnig percentage was off the hop, I kinda remembered he went something like 10 wins without a loss or some such stat, but I can't find that...
But his Wiki page showed something I didn't know....
"Calgary Stampeders
Dan Hawkins, Maier's head coach at UC Davis, mentioned to Maier that he could potentially flourish in the Canadian Football League. Following Maier's 2017 season at UC Davis, Hawkins reached out to Ryan Dinwiddie,[3] who had played quarterback for Hawkins at Boise State University from 2001 to 2003, and had been on Hawkins' coaching staff with the Montreal Alouettes in 2013.[4] Hawkins told Dinwiddie, who was coaching quarterbacks with the Calgary Stampeders at the time, "you'd better put this kid on your [negotiation] list cause he's legit. He's got the 'it' factor. He has what I call the 'rage to master.'"[3] The Stampeders added Maier to their negotiation list in 2018.[3]
On May 5, 2020, after completing his college career, Maier signed with the Calgary Stampeders.[5] However, he did not play that year due to the cancellation of the 2020 CFL season."
So there's the link, plain as day.
As for Dru coming to WPG, sounds like Zach had a lot to do with it, he said Dru is his best friend.
One of Elgersma or Perkins ends up with the short stick, one of them has some trade value. I'm not saying either are going to be starters in this league tomorrow, but I wouldn't be surprised if either gets there.
Both are under contract next year at least, and I have no doubt that this will be Zach's last year on the field (might take a move upstairs). Dru, Taylor, Bryce is not a bad QB room for 2027.
Quote from: theaardvark on June 25, 2026, 02:24:05 PMI was trying to find out what Maier's winnig percentage was off the hop, I kinda remembered he went something like 10 wins without a loss or some such stat, but I can't find that...
But his Wiki page showed something I didn't know....
"Calgary Stampeders
Dan Hawkins, Maier's head coach at UC Davis, mentioned to Maier that he could potentially flourish in the Canadian Football League. Following Maier's 2017 season at UC Davis, Hawkins reached out to Ryan Dinwiddie,[3] who had played quarterback for Hawkins at Boise State University from 2001 to 2003, and had been on Hawkins' coaching staff with the Montreal Alouettes in 2013.[4] Hawkins told Dinwiddie, who was coaching quarterbacks with the Calgary Stampeders at the time, "you'd better put this kid on your [negotiation] list cause he's legit. He's got the 'it' factor. He has what I call the 'rage to master.'"[3] The Stampeders added Maier to their negotiation list in 2018.[3]
On May 5, 2020, after completing his college career, Maier signed with the Calgary Stampeders.[5] However, he did not play that year due to the cancellation of the 2020 CFL season."
So there's the link, plain as day.
As for Dru coming to WPG, sounds like Zach had a lot to do with it, he said Dru is his best friend.
One of Elgersma or Perkins ends up with the short stick, one of them has some trade value. I'm not saying either are going to be starters in this league tomorrow, but I wouldn't be surprised if either gets there.
Both are under contract next year at least, and I have no doubt that this will be Zach's last year on the field (might take a move upstairs). Dru, Taylor, Bryce is not a bad QB room for 2027.
I think that was Arbuckle in Calgary, he set high expectations.
Quote from: Pete on June 25, 2026, 02:02:45 PMIt appears than short of Kelly, Rourke and Davis, Dinwiddie prefers a contol, game manager type of qb. Brown isn't that he fits more in The gunslinger mode. mode which is more suited to Condell
Watched a Dinwiddie interview this morning, he talked about the ability to move the ball down field decisively, he thinks MBT still has one of the strongest arms in the league.
Quote from: Pete on June 25, 2026, 02:02:45 PMIt appears than short of Kelly, Rourke and Davis, Dinwiddie prefers a contol, game manager type of qb. Brown isn't that he fits more in The gunslinger mode. mode which is more suited to Condell
Very good point
give me bombs and runs for the next decade and I'm happy
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on June 25, 2026, 04:22:17 PMI think that was Arbuckle in Calgary, he set high expectations.
Ya. Maier never lit anything up. And never looked good anywhere. He's like early-years Cody, had Cody never "got better". Maier is more like Dom Davis: he won a few here and there, and looked like he could maybe have a future. But then splat.
Quote from: Pete on June 25, 2026, 02:02:45 PMIt appears than short of Kelly, Rourke and Davis, Dinwiddie prefers a contol, game manager type of qb. Brown isn't that he fits more in The gunslinger mode. mode which is more suited to Condell
I don't know... Dinwiddie would give his left nut to get Kelly right now. I think he's working on it for '27 or '28. And they don't come more gunslinger than Kelly! He's literally the most slingingest guy out there -- throws into everything with wild abandon. He doesn't give a poop about INTs as long as he also gets TDs. And he's the #1 disciple of Dinwiddie!
Quote from: Blue In BC on June 25, 2026, 01:24:02 PMYou can't possibly think that teams won't have some sort of plan on how they will use that reserve.
Wasn't the RR foisted on teams pretty late in FA? It may be like the '25 $400k fiasco: teams didn't have enough time to factor it in properly.
I think RR was purely reactionary to combat the fake 1GIR overusage by everyone in '25.
Quote from: Tecno on June 26, 2026, 07:34:49 AMYa. Maier never lit anything up. And never looked good anywhere. He's like early-years Cody, had Cody never "got better". Maier is more like Dom Davis: he won a few here and there, and looked like he could maybe have a future. But then splat.
If memory serves, Maier looked good enough to move on from Mitchell...
Quote from: Tecno on June 26, 2026, 07:37:57 AMWasn't the RR foisted on teams pretty late in FA? It may be like the '25 $400k fiasco: teams didn't have enough time to factor it in properly.
I think RR was purely reactionary to combat the fake 1GIR overusage by everyone in '25.
Ya maybe, I'm not sure. It's not the smartest change in roster size or varied designations. We can't even tell if it's used until after the game. Clarification would be nice.
Quote from: theaardvark on June 26, 2026, 05:22:15 PMIf memory serves, Maier looked good enough to move on from Mitchell...
The Stamps were faltering at the time and it looked like Mitchell was done, plus he was still earning big bucks.
OK, where has the debate settled on the QB room?
QB1 - ZC8, of course
QB2 - DB3
QB3 - BP9 (for short yardage)
RR - TE13
Does that sound right? Sending TE13 to the PR null and voids his contract, which means we lose all control on him going forward, so he has to either be RR or IR. And its not like he's breaking the bank.
Makes the transition to next year and ZC8 retiring easier for all involved, he can feel good about leaving the Bombers in the hands of his best friend, BP9 and TE13 are under contract at reasonable rates. Dru can then be signed to low side of starting salary, with incentives.
If ZC8 wants to play one more year, DB3 could be signed to a similar deal he has now, with a bump for 2028 to starters pay, and we do another year with 4 QBs.
Does that sound about right?
Or, does TE13 have trade value?
Quote from: theaardvark on June 26, 2026, 05:22:15 PMIf memory serves, Maier looked good enough to move on from Mitchell...
No he didn't, wasnt that Arbuckle you're thinking of?? Maier was recently run out of Calgary to a backup role in Sask, now starters role with the Deadblacks and we get Brown because of that. We should send Dinwiddie a thank you card, signed by 30,000 fans!!!
Maier never looked great. Bo was sooo bad, worse than brohm, throwing it straight to the other team or the dirt. It's one of the few times I felt uncomfortable watching a player get so pathetic.
Maier was there, and options were limited. No one knew if Maier would improve. He might have. It was a gamble. Huff and Dickenson lost.
I think the unforgivable aspect is giving Maier more than one year. Because by then they knew what they had.
Quote from: theaardvark on June 26, 2026, 06:41:36 PMOr, does TE13 have trade value?
Crazy talk. Until we find out we have a clinker, elgersma's the heir apparent. Though it might take 1 to 3 seasons of dev.
Dru is here to help us survive if Zach gets hurt. Right now. Who knows what the idea is for next season. But if Zach retires and we can't get a superstar in fa then dru becomes a decent number 1.
I think ideally we keep the same lineup, all 4, for 2027. Don't know dru's contact situation though, and he left because he didn't want to backup. Maybe we can tell him sweet lies about being number 1...
Then when the time comes if elgersma is Rourke he becomes number 1. If not, dru takes it over and we wait on elgersma or go to fa.
Either way I think we're in a good qb position for the next 2 to 3 seasons.
Quote from: Tecno on June 27, 2026, 06:38:37 AMCrazy talk. Until we find out we have a clinker, elgersma's the heir apparent. Though it might take 1 to 3 seasons of dev.
Dru is here to help us survive if Zach gets hurt. Right now. Who knows what the idea is for next season. But if Zach retires and we can't get a superstar in fa then dru becomes a decent number 1.
I think ideally we keep the same lineup, all 4, for 2027. Don't know dru's contact situation though, and he left because he didn't want to backup. Maybe we can tell him sweet lies about being number 1...
Then when the time comes if elgersma is Rourke he becomes number 1. If not, dru takes it over and we wait on elgersma or go to fa.
Either way I think we're in a good qb position for the next 2 to 3 seasons.
Dru is signed through this year, Byrce and Taylor through at least 2027 barring NFL looks.
We'd have to sign Dru to keep the QB room the same. Unless another team is desperate, if Zach wants to play in 27, I think he will bring Dru back into the room with the anticipation of Dru taking over in 28.
Now, if either Perkins or Elgersma makes some amazing strides forward, they could displace Dru. I don't think we end up with DB3, BP9 and TE13 as a QB room in 29, though...
Quote from: theaardvark on June 27, 2026, 02:29:55 PMDru is signed through this year, Byrce and Taylor through at least 2027 barring NFL looks.
We'd have to sign Dru to keep the QB room the same. Unless another team is desperate, if Zach wants to play in 27, I think he will bring Dru back into the room with the anticipation of Dru taking over in 28.
Now, if either Perkins or Elgersma makes some amazing strides forward, they could displace Dru. I don't think we end up with DB3, BP9 and TE13 as a QB room in 29, though...
How could Elgersma make any progress as fourth string QB? He will never see the field if that is his status. Bombers are smarter than that. Condell has been around the CFL a long time. Hopefully he gets to call the shots in terms of QB hierarchy and not MOS.
The ONLY thing that makes sense is Perkins as odd man out. I see Perkins as having no chance of ever starting. He is clearly #3 in practices. No one is going to pick him up. When we have an injury then he comes back. If we play games with Elgersma we will lose him and he is never coming back.
Do I like Perkins getting extra yards on the sneak? Yes. I am also ok just getting the first down and extending the drive which Elgersma could do. Or get creative by using someone else?
The short yardage QB is its own position. Neither Brown or Elgersma is fighting for that position and it doesn't benefit either more or less by being in that role.
Quote from: theaardvark on June 26, 2026, 06:41:36 PMOK, where has the debate settled on the QB room?
QB1 - ZC8, of course
QB2 - DB3
QB3 - BP9 (for short yardage)
RR - TE13
Does that sound right? Sending TE13 to the PR null and voids his contract, which means we lose all control on him going forward, so he has to either be RR or IR. And its not like he's breaking the bank.
Makes the transition to next year and ZC8 retiring easier for all involved, he can feel good about leaving the Bombers in the hands of his best friend, BP9 and TE13 are under contract at reasonable rates. Dru can then be signed to low side of starting salary, with incentives.
If ZC8 wants to play one more year, DB3 could be signed to a similar deal he has now, with a bump for 2028 to starters pay, and we do another year with 4 QBs.
Does that sound about right?
Or, does TE13 have trade value?
I think that's about right. I don't believe we will trade Elgersma. It may depend on whether we can re-negotiate / extend Brown. His contract details / length are a question at the moment. Whether Collaros has made any determination about retiring after this season and his contract length.
Putting Elgersma on RR seems a no brainer. Not a huge SMS hit and he gets to continue to develop and be assessed. Not many rookie QB's are ready year 1.
Quote from: theaardvark on June 27, 2026, 02:29:55 PMDru is signed through this year, Byrce and Taylor through at least 2027 barring NFL looks.
We'd have to sign Dru to keep the QB room the same.
That changes things a bit. We won't tie up big $ on a stacked QB room with "2 #1's" -- it's not the Mafia way.
So we have two different views of the situation going on:
Mafia perspective:
1. Dru is a cheap rest-of-season rental and maybe the best insurance that was a realistic possibility.
2. Dru is in-house should Zach get injured or retire before '27. That means we have our foot in the door for a bid on him starting in '27 -- should we want that because Elgersma isn't ready.
Dru perspective:
A. Says he will only play where he wants to start. There is no starting job anywhere right now. So he accepts the backup role, why? Because he has to.
B. He knows Zach has 50/50 chance of missing 2-4 games and Dru will be the starter.
C. He knows if he lights it up in relief and Zach retires then he's probably the starter. Even if he never sees the field in '26 he's a strong contender to be starter in '27 because there may literally be no one else for WPG in FA.
D. He'll feel far more valued and respected in WPG.
It's win-win for everyone in 2026 (except our 2 1RDP cost). The issues start in FA27. Only if no one else wants Dru to start will he be available as a backup. And as a backup he'll probably be the most expensive one in the league. We won't pay a backup more than $175-ish. Other teams value backups more and will outbid us -- unless we start him.
Quote from: Doublezero on June 27, 2026, 02:56:24 PMHow could Elgersma make any progress as fourth string QB? He will never see the field if that is his status.
How did Alexander ever make progress without seeing the field? He was 3rd string in MTL in '22 and '23, seeing an avg of 7 completions
per season. In other words, he essentially never saw the field. And yet he's the best CFL QB right now. That's how Elgersma will make progress. It's how most CFL QBs make progress. They clipboard, and watch, and practice.
One ding to Zach and Elgersma will be charted #2. That means he
could see the field.
I'm not sure why anyone ever thinks it will be or should be different? Yes, this situation is a bit difference because he'll be #4 instead of #3, but it works out to the same thing in the end.
Quote from: Waffler on June 27, 2026, 03:17:53 PMThe ONLY thing that makes sense is Perkins as odd man out. I see Perkins as having no chance of ever starting. He is clearly #3 in practices. No one is going to pick him up. When we have an injury then he comes back. If we play games with Elgersma we will lose him and he is never coming back.
You're thinking like other teams. Mafia values top SY producers
very highly indeed. Strev, being a unique multi-threat guy, kind of screwed up our SY continuity, but in years where he wasn't here we always had a top-notch dedicated SY QB.
Perkins is still 100% -- my definition being no ToD. And he's punchy and confident -- really putting his stamp on every sneak. That gets noticed. If he starts whiffing and causing ToD, maybe 2 times in 3 weeks, then we re-evaluate.
Clearly mafia thought Perkins was better at SY. They gave Elgersma many chances in PS. He looked fine at it.
It could also be they don't want Elgersma to get hurt for nothing in SY. Or waste his time learning & mastering that whole book when he needs to be learning the real QB book.
Since the CFL has given us this wonderful RR to use, tailor made for Taylor, then use it and everyone is happy. What does this cost us other than Perkin's ELC $??
Dru Brown could still develop into a legit starter especially under Zach.....TE is still unproven and if Zach goes down he would likely struggle at leading the team! Dru has experience and he can win games if we lose Zach. This was the best QB scenario IMHO!
Quote from: Tecno on June 28, 2026, 07:28:07 AMThat changes things a bit. We won't tie up big $ on a stacked QB room with "2 #1's" -- it's not the Mafia way.
So we have two different views of the situation going on:
Mafia perspective:
1. Dru is a cheap rest-of-season rental and maybe the best insurance that was a realistic possibility.
2. Dru is in-house should Zach get injured or retire before '27. That means we have our foot in the door for a bid on him starting in '27 -- should we want that because Elgersma isn't ready.
Dru perspective:
A. Says he will only play where he wants to start. There is no starting job anywhere right now. So he accepts the backup role, why? Because he has to.
B. He knows Zach has 50/50 chance of missing 2-4 games and Dru will be the starter.
C. He knows if he lights it up in relief and Zach retires then he's probably the starter. Even if he never sees the field in '26 he's a strong contender to be starter in '27 because there may literally be no one else for WPG in FA.
D. He'll feel far more valued and respected in WPG.
It's win-win for everyone in 2026 (except our 2 1RDP cost). The issues start in FA27. Only if no one else wants Dru to start will he be available as a backup. And as a backup he'll probably be the most expensive one in the league. We won't pay a backup more than $175-ish. Other teams value backups more and will outbid us -- unless we start him.
Miss the playoffs and big changes will be made, if Zach comes back at all in 2027 it should be at half his contract value, which would be enough to pay for Dru Brown. A purge of the remaining old timers would likely take place to increase the energy level if nothing else, enough younger vets would be left to take up the leadership role, which is how it's supposed to work.
The team can work with Brown as the starter, how well he does remains to be seen but I don't have high hopes he'll become an elite QB, more of a competent place holder. Elgersma will be there to step in when Dru gets hurt or falls apart, if he shows he's the more productive of the two when the bright lights are on the transition from Zach will be complete. If Elgersma turns out to be the next Taylor Cornelius it may take a few years before they figure out the new path they need to take, by that time O'Shea may well be done.
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on June 28, 2026, 06:24:35 PMMiss the playoffs and big changes will be made, if Zach comes back at all in 2027 it should be at half his contract value, which would be enough to pay for Dru Brown. A purge of the remaining old timers would likely take place
Changes, true. But "oldster purge" might not be what you expect/want. "Mafia way" is to keep the smartest vets around well into the best-before date to teach up the noobs and direct traffic. Well, on D and OL at least (REC, not so much).
I would expect at any given moment Mafia will keep at least 2 uber-vets on D. I can't imagine they'd do a blanket purge of, say, "everyone over 32" on D.
I just don't see 4 QB's here. Not enough reps for #4. Even 3 barely gets any as it is.
Quote from: Waffler on June 29, 2026, 02:45:39 PMI just don't see 4 QB's here. Not enough reps for #4. Even 3 barely gets any as it is.
There are always 4 QBs. 3 on the AR and 1 on the PR.
Most "reps" in practice are in drills where all the QBs get equal reps and time. Same thing in film review.
If you're talking about scrimmage reps. Elgersma was extremely fortunate to get all the #2 reps in TC and preseason as a rookie, but now it's time for him to take the mental reps and fight his way up the depth chart, imo.
Quote from: Jesse on June 29, 2026, 02:56:36 PMThere are always 4 QBs. 3 on the AR and 1 on the PR.
Most "reps" in practice are in drills where all the QBs get equal reps and time. Same thing in film review.
If you're talking about scrimmage reps. Elgersma was extremely fortunate to get all the #2 reps in TC and preseason as a rookie, but now it's time for him to take the mental reps and fight his way up the depth chart, imo.
Don't always have a 4th QB on the PR.
I wonder whether Brown is our # 3 QB this week or remains on the RR? It's almost moot because it's too early for him to have a good read on the playbook if Collaros gets injured and Perkins is doing well on short yardage.
As far as SMS it costs us the same since I don't expect us to release Perkins.
We don't practice today but I am waiting to see if we have a small airlift of 1 -3 players for the PR. To some degree that will clarify whether we have new injuries headed to IR.
I'm still of the opinion we should be considering Teuhema to bring onto the PR or even activated if Ceresna can't play.
Quote from: Blue In BC on June 29, 2026, 03:30:44 PMDon't always have a 4th QB on the PR.
I wonder whether Brown is our # 3 QB this week or remains on the RR? It's almost moot because it's too early for him to have a good read on the playbook if Collaros gets injured and Perkins is doing well on short yardage.
As far as SMS it costs us the same since I don't expect us to release Perkins.
We don't practice today but I am waiting to see if we have a small airlift of 1 -3 players for the PR. To some degree that will clarify whether we have new injuries headed to IR.
I'm still of the opinion we should be considering Teuhema to bring onto the PR or even activated if Ceresna can't play.
With so many players in injury limbo I don't see them bringing in extra bodies for the PR unless there's a dire shortage, just makes it more difficult to sort out when players return to health and it's too early for new tryouts. It actually might be the case at DT as none of the new guys have the bulk to play that role. Saw Jenkins trying to hold the line on a goal line stand and he got bulldozed, he probably shouldn't be on the field in that situation. Ottawa found a beauty in Ageli, 6'-0" 300 lbs, he looks wider than he is tall.
Quote from: Tecno on June 29, 2026, 12:46:39 PMChanges, true. But "oldster purge" might not be what you expect/want. "Mafia way" is to keep the smartest vets around well into the best-before date to teach up the noobs and direct traffic. Well, on D and OL at least (REC, not so much).
I would expect at any given moment Mafia will keep at least 2 uber-vets on D. I can't imagine they'd do a blanket purge of, say, "everyone over 32" on D.
The old vets I'm specifically referring to are well past their prime, Stanley, Kyrie, Willie, Zach and maybe Neuf, although I think he's still has a few solid years of play left. Could see them keeping Willie as a limited rotational player for his special abilities and fan appeal, currently he spends too many plays pacing himself so he can play the entire game.
31:36 Dru briefly removes his cap, to reveal an amazing Eddie Munster hairline.
Quote from: Blue In BC on June 29, 2026, 03:30:44 PMI'm still of the opinion we should be considering Teuhema to bring onto the PR or even activated if Ceresna can't play.
If Ceresna goes 6G then ya, grab Teuhema, because the SMS hit won't be as dire. I sure hope not, but Ceresna could turn into a bust if he's tub-bound all the time. Unless we start aiming for "playoff only" impact players, I've always been fine with that idea (kinda cheating).
If so I'd make offers to Teuhema
before you tell anyone Ceresna is gonzo, because you don't want Teuhema to be able to dictate $$ terms.
Quote from: Blue In BC on June 29, 2026, 03:30:44 PMWe don't practice today but I am waiting to see if we have a small airlift of 1 -3 players for the PR. To some degree that will clarify whether we have new injuries headed to IR.
What does that even mean? It's shameful, really. The team is awful. We may not even beat OTT, given what they showed vs MTL. And so it's sitting on the dock with margaritas again??
I don't care about CFLPA/league rules, everyone should be in the barn practicing, lifting, and film-studying. No one is going to get better sitting on their duff.
Every unit should be taking it upon themselves to meet in private, on their "own time", figuring out how to get better. Is no one taking things seriously??
P.S. The official practice rules in the CFL are a joke now. Even MOS is pseudo-scoffing at them in pressers. Paraphrasing: "no one can get better because there's almost zero padded practice allowed, and no tackling allowed, and practices are so short & limited".
Quote from: Tecno on June 30, 2026, 02:30:39 AMWhat does that even mean? It's shameful, really. The team is awful. We may not even beat OTT, given what they showed vs MTL. And so it's sitting on the dock with margaritas again??
I don't care about CFLPA/league rules, everyone should be in the barn practicing, lifting, and film-studying. No one is going to get better sitting on their duff.
Every unit should be taking it upon themselves to meet in private, on their "own time", figuring out how to get better. Is no one taking things seriously??
P.S. The official practice rules in the CFL are a joke now. Even MOS is pseudo-scoffing at them in pressers. Paraphrasing: "no one can get better because there's almost zero padded practice allowed, and no tackling allowed, and practices are so short & limited".
Yeah, I don't think not practicing today has anything to do with league rules. It's the team giving the players an extra day of rest. Which they often do.
Quote from: Jesse on June 30, 2026, 02:34:05 AMYeah, I don't think not practicing today has anything to do with league rules. It's the team giving the players an extra day of rest. Which they often do.
And that very well may be the problem.
I never hear about other teams giving the players extra rest and days off when rules say they can practice.
In fact, the last HC that made a big deal of this is Dickenson The Lesser who, instead of practicing when SSK stunk, took the boys bowling. It became a running joke on the Riders forum. It really miffed fans, so much so that that is when many cancelled their ST, never to return.
Quote from: Jesse on June 29, 2026, 02:56:36 PMThere are always 4 QBs. 3 on the AR and 1 on the PR.
Most "reps" in practice are in drills where all the QBs get equal reps and time. Same thing in film review.
If you're talking about scrimmage reps. Elgersma was extremely fortunate to get all the #2 reps in TC and preseason as a rookie, but now it's time for him to take the mental reps and fight his way up the depth chart, imo.
Don't always have 4 QBs, simply not true
Reps are not equal either as a whole
Quote from: Tecno on June 30, 2026, 02:45:01 AMAnd that very well may be the problem.
I never hear about other teams giving the players extra rest and days off when rules say they can practice.
In fact, the last HC that made a big deal of this is Dickenson The Lesser who, instead of practicing when SSK stunk, took the boys bowling. It became a running joke on the Riders forum. It really miffed fans, so much so that that is when many cancelled their ST, never to return.
There's always an ongoing debate between rest vs. practice. I don't think there's a right or a wrong answer, it's a coaches job to understand what the majority of his team needs. During the bye week, they took the bare minimum amount of days off, but after the game, they clearly got an extra day. Most likely because injuries were starting to pile up.
Quote from: Jesse on June 30, 2026, 11:23:03 AMThere's always an ongoing debate between rest vs. practice. I don't think there's a right or a wrong answer, it's a coaches job to understand what the majority of his team needs. During the bye week, they took the bare minimum amount of days off, but after the game, they clearly got an extra day. Most likely because injuries were starting to pile up.
There is a league restriction on the number of practices during the week. Bombers play again Sunday, so I think we see a Tue, Wed and Thurs practice this week.
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on June 29, 2026, 05:30:20 PMWith so many players in injury limbo I don't see them bringing in extra bodies for the PR unless there's a dire shortage, just makes it more difficult to sort out when players return to health and it's too early for new tryouts. It actually might be the case at DT as none of the new guys have the bulk to play that role. Saw Jenkins trying to hold the line on a goal line stand and he got bulldozed, he probably shouldn't be on the field in that situation. Ottawa found a beauty in Ageli, 6'-0" 300 lbs, he looks wider than he is tall.
Injury limbo. That's the catch. We don't know if or when any of the injured players will return. Schmekel is the only DT on the IR with some weight.
Dixon is a DE and injured. Jenkins is a DE and playing. Nobody else is available on our PR besides Kornelson, another Canadian DT.
Just for the record, IMO it doesn't take a lot of time for a rookie DT to get up to speed compared to most other positions.
Someone mentioned that we didn't want to give Teuhema a negotiating advantage by disclosing an injury to Ceresna. We don't know Ceresna will miss time but if we contact Teuhema, wouldn't he be aware of that situation. Generally I don't think a free agent has much negotiating room in any case.
Quote from: Blue In BC on June 30, 2026, 02:30:40 PMInjury limbo. That's the catch. We don't know if or when any of the injured players will return. Schmekel is the only DT on the IR with some weight.
Dixon is a DE and injured. Jenkins is a DE and playing. Nobody else is available on our PR besides Kornelson, another Canadian DT.
Just for the record, IMO it doesn't take a lot of time for a rookie DT to get up to speed compared to most other positions.
Someone mentioned that we didn't want to give Teuhema a negotiating advantage by disclosing an injury to Ceresna. We don't know Ceresna will miss time but if we contact Teuhema, wouldn't he be aware of that situation. Generally I don't think a free agent has much negotiating room in any case.
I believe Kornelson is healthy, if Ceresna can't play he's the obvious choice, we'll find out soon enough. That would be an option that allows them to further experiment with the ratio on defence, say at 2nd Safety, although healthy bodies all around seem to be lacking to do so. At least when they used the 6 game as prescribed we had a clue as to who they thought was seriously damaged.
Quote from: Blue In BC on June 30, 2026, 01:01:25 PMThere is a league restriction on the number of practices during the week. Bombers play again Sunday, so I think we see a Tue, Wed and Thurs practice this week.
I doubt these guys work 40 hour weeks, I guess it depends what is considered practice time, but meeting in a class room every day for 3-4 hours to watch film shouldn't increase their injury risk. Receiving mandated days off from work every week must be nice so they can catch up on their nap time. I'd like to join that union!
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on June 30, 2026, 04:00:30 PMI doubt these guys work 40 hour weeks, I guess it depends what is considered practice time, but meeting in a class room every day for 3-4 hours to watch film shouldn't increase their injury risk. Receiving mandated days off from work every week must be nice so they can catch up on their nap time. I'd like to join that union!
I think the mandate is fairly clear to the teams. It may not be as clear to us but we see 2 practice and 3 practice weeks. There are rules teams must follow including in TC restricting number of times pads are worn. Obviously an effort to reduce number of injuries.
The catch here is that players are better athletes than in the 1060's for example. They train all year and are faster, bigger and stronger.
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on June 30, 2026, 03:51:44 PMI believe Kornelson is healthy, if Ceresna can't play he's the obvious choice, we'll find out soon enough. That would be an option that allows them to further experiment with the ratio on defence, say at 2nd Safety, although healthy bodies all around seem to be lacking to do so. At least when they used the 6 game as prescribed we had a clue as to who they thought was seriously damaged.
Yes, Kornelson is on the PR and healthy in theory. He hasn't taken a consistent role on the AR during his time here. OTOH, he may be the only choice we have today. The best advantage is that it's a ratio bonus.
As you mentioned, due to limited additional players, it's not clear what we'd do with that issue. Texada on defence would keep Kelly off the field. Singer instead of Corcoran or Cobb might provide more of an offensive spark.
I wonder if any of the " large " OL have ever played DL during their careers.
Quote from: Blue In BC on June 30, 2026, 02:30:40 PMSomeone mentioned that we didn't want to give Teuhema a negotiating advantage by disclosing an injury to Ceresna. We don't know Ceresna will miss time but if we contact Teuhema, wouldn't he be aware of that situation. Generally I don't think a free agent has much negotiating room in any case.
They do when they are quality! Teuhema isn't the best, but he is quality. Look at when Lemon (and Sankey?) was team shopping. You just wait for injuries to pile up, knowing most teams are short at many positions and starting a rookie isn't necessarily going to help you win. Then you name your price (pro-rated of course).
If I was a quality couch-sitter, that's what I'd do! And you get to sit on the couch until you get that call! What's not to love.
Quote from: Blue In BC on June 30, 2026, 01:01:25 PMThere is a league restriction on the number of practices during the week.
And that's one of the problems. It's enough of a problem for MOS to mention it -- and he rarely disses the league.
Here's the problem: the small number of practices is part of what entrenches good teams or dynasties. You get players/units who gel, you try to keep them mostly intact for many seasons, and you reap the rewards of being able to be good without much practice.
Proof? See WPG for 5 seasons. See SSK carrying over the quality from '25. See MTL being ace for 3-4 seasons now.
But a team that has a hodgepodge of players, or many rookies, or high player turnover: unless magic happens, they don't have much chance of gelling because they can't get in the practice levels that will result in gel.
Proof? See our DB corps, the DL, our DL, REC corps. No gel. And unless there's a miracle, they may not improve enough to win. And keep in mind the top teams, the ones who have the gel, will only gel more as they practice -- but law of diminishing returns means the gains will be smaller. And while we're trying hard to gel, the teams that have it are racking up wins that become insurmountable.
I bet if you doubled practice time, and tripled padded practice, you'd get a lot less multi-year domination by any small set of teams. It would allow all teams, regardless of continuity, an opportunity to improve at a faster pace. And since CFL/CFLPA will never allow that, you have the units go off and practice on their "own time".
If you watch F1, it's kind of the same thing: you get your team dominant and then you get the FIA to "freeze" the rules of whatever makes you good (engine, or aero or whatever). And when you suck (like Ferrari and Mercedes before this year) then you get the FIA to unfreeze and change everything into your favor again. Then you freeze it. Make it so other teams can't improve when you are good.
In the mos presser yesterday Paul asks a question about Dru's relationship problems or something, but mos deflects. What is he talking about? Paul made it sound like he broke up with his wife or something? Or did he mean what Dinwiddie did to him?? Confused.
Dru mentions his wife in his presser same day, so that can't be it, right?
Quote from: Tecno on July 01, 2026, 04:48:12 AMThey do when they are quality! Teuhema isn't the best, but he is quality. Look at when Lemon (and Sankey?) was team shopping. You just wait for injuries to pile up, knowing most teams are short at many positions and starting a rookie isn't necessarily going to help you win. Then you name your price (pro-rated of course).
If I was a quality couch-sitter, that's what I'd do! And you get to sit on the couch until you get that call! What's not to love.
And yet he hasn't been signed by any team yet.
Quote from: Blue In BC on July 01, 2026, 01:10:29 PMAnd yet he hasn't been signed by any team yet.
Which proves my point, not yours. He's telling suitors the price is steep.
No one is desperate enough yet. But they will be.
Quote from: Tecno on July 01, 2026, 01:12:44 PMWhich proves my point, not yours. He's telling suitors the price is steep.
No one is desperate enough yet. But they will be.
I don't think it does and neither does a comparison between Lemon and Sankey who were top performers.
How do you know he's telling suitors the price is steep and who are the suitors if no one is desperate?
Most teams have other DL on their PR. Bombers seemed to drop the ball for TC after signing Ceresna without finding depth behind him. Same problem at DE.
This week is game 4.
Techno... I don't think you know what the word "proof" means. You use it when you mean "example" and when you mean a point in favour of your conjecture.
MOS mentioned that last week they had a "day off" yet everyone was in the film room...
As to Dru's relationships, it is no doubt about Dinwiddie. Dru was the starter, and Dinwiddie brought in Maier (his "discovery" in CGY) and anointed him the starter. If that doesn't strain a relationship, you aren't human.
Dru and Zach are best friends, and he'd much rather back up Zach than Maier.
Quote from: theaardvark on July 01, 2026, 08:22:43 PMMOS mentioned that last week they had a "day off" yet everyone was in the film room...
As to Dru's relationships, it is no doubt about Dinwiddie. Dru was the starter, and Dinwiddie brought in Maier (his "discovery" in CGY) and anointed him the starter. If that doesn't strain a relationship, you aren't human.
Dru and Zach are best friends, and he'd much rather back up Zach than Maier.
Honestly not a good look on Dru's part telling Dinwiddie he wanted to be released, how many vet QB's have been demoted, traded or cut and taken their lumps as part of the job? Nearly every one except Rourke and Alexander. Don't think Dinwiddie saw that response coming as he had no intention of cutting Brown after paying him a pre-season bonus. As GM he dodged a bullet when Walters offered him draft picks to take him off his hands.
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on July 01, 2026, 09:45:16 PMHonestly not a good look on Dru's part telling Dinwiddie he wanted to be released, how many vet QB's have been demoted, traded or cut and taken their lumps as part of the job? Nearly every one except Rourke and Alexander. Don't think Dinwiddie saw that response coming as he had no intention of cutting Brown after paying him a pre-season bonus. As GM he dodged a bullet when Walters offered him draft picks to take him off his hands.
Agree. MOS said in his interview that Brown had a high emotional intelligence...really?? He pouted when he got demoted. VAJ didn't do that when they brought in Rourke, Fajardo didn't do that when he was demoted first in Sask and then Montreal. This was not a good look for Dru Brown. The way he played in 2025 he deserved to be benched, but anyone with an ounce of brains knows Maier is going to crap out in Ottawa, so wait your turn--your opportunity to start was better in Ottawa than it is in Winnipeg, but somehow he's happy he's here. We're a marginally better team than Ottawa, still the bottom half of the league and unless there's an injury, you ain't seeing the field. We'll see how long Maier last in Ottawa, MBT will be in after the next 2 or 3 more losses. You can't go 0-7 and still stay with the same guy at Qb
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on July 01, 2026, 09:45:16 PMHonestly not a good look on Dru's part telling Dinwiddie he wanted to be released, how many vet QB's have been demoted, traded or cut and taken their lumps as part of the job? Nearly every one except Rourke and Alexander. Don't think Dinwiddie saw that response coming as he had no intention of cutting Brown after paying him a pre-season bonus. As GM he dodged a bullet when Walters offered him draft picks to take him off his hands.
Wanting to be released when you are clearly the better QB, especially in the department Dinwiddie calls you out on, is not a bad sign in my book. It shows he doesn't stand for being disrespected, which Dinwiddie did.
This was not a case of being demoted over his quality of play, or acquiring a much better QB, and "taking his lumps" is in no way what taking the demotion would be.
He is a fighter, and no doubt he thought he'd have a chance to fight for his spot in OTT. But it quickly became apparent that he had no chance of winning the spot, regardless his or Maier's play.
Quote from: theaardvark on July 02, 2026, 12:22:53 AMWanting to be released when you are clearly the better QB, especially in the department Dinwiddie calls you out on, is not a bad sign in my book. It shows he doesn't stand for being disrespected, which Dinwiddie did.
This was not a case of being demoted over his quality of play, or acquiring a much better QB, and "taking his lumps" is in no way what taking the demotion would be.
He is a fighter, and no doubt he thought he'd have a chance to fight for his spot in OTT. But it quickly became apparent that he had no chance of winning the spot, regardless his or Maier's play.
Dinwiddie's words came after the fact, he was just filling the air with plausible reasons to explain what transpired, none of them are necessarily true as it was Brown's decision to quit the club, not his. As the GM and HC Dinwiddie's neck is on the line, he is free to invest in whoever he likes, he had all winter to watch film of Brown and decided he didn't like what he saw for whatever reason.
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on July 01, 2026, 09:45:16 PMHonestly not a good look on Dru's part telling Dinwiddie he wanted to be released, how many vet QB's have been demoted, traded or cut and taken their lumps as part of the job? Nearly every one except Rourke and Alexander. Don't think Dinwiddie saw that response coming as he had no intention of cutting Brown after paying him a pre-season bonus. As GM he dodged a bullet when Walters offered him draft picks to take him off his hands.
Dinwiddie telling lies to save his job. Saying Maiers arm is > Dru on deep ball was laughable. CJOB had the stats are Dru was near the top, Maier near the bottom. Agree with nothing said here.
Quote from: dd on July 01, 2026, 10:18:00 PMAgree. MOS said in his interview that Brown had a high emotional intelligence...really?? He pouted like a punk when he got demoted, something someone with a low emotional intelligence would do. VAJ didn't do that when they brought in Rourke, Fajardo didn't do that when he was demoted first in Sask and then Montreal. This was not a good look for Dru Brown. The way he played in 2025 he deserved to be benched, but anyone with an ounce of brains knows Maier is going to crap out in Ottawa, so wait your turn--your opportunity to start was better in Ottawa than it is in Winnipeg, but somehow he's happy he's here. We're a marginally better team than Ottawa, still the bottom half of the league and unless there's an injury, you ain't seeing the field. We'll see how long Maier last in Ottawa, MBT will be in after the next 2 or 3 more losses. You can't go 0-7 and still stay with the same guy at Qb
Dru doesn't have low emotional intelligence. He didn't pout like a punk, way overstated there. Dru was in a bad situation with Dinwiddie as he wasn't he guy. He did well to get out of that tire fire. Brown played well in Ott. Their team sucked, he didn't. He has an injury problem. An average QB. Agree with almost nothing posted here other then the fact that Maier will sizzle out hard but so will MBT.
Brown turned the ball over way too much last year and dinwiddie decided to go in another direction. It's not a good look when a player quits on a team, shows no integrity
Im glad to see Dru here. The negativity is all based on only one guys narrative.. Dinwiddie.
The same guy whose inventing things to justify his decisions.
Pretty classless to put down the guy you traded when all he had to say was Dru wasn't a good fit for the schemes he wants to run
Quote from: Blueforlife on July 02, 2026, 01:04:56 AMDinwiddie telling lies to save his job. Saying Maiers arm is > Dru on deep ball was laughable.
He specifically said arm strength. I won't argue that Maier can put a lot of heat on short balls -- he probably does have more zip. But Dru has a far prettier deep ball, kind of lack Zach. Real beautiful passes & touch. If it's up to pure distance, I bet Dru out-throws Maier.
That said, this season is being won (so far) by the QBs that can zip in heaters on short passes in tight zone windows. Maier might be better suited to that.
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on July 02, 2026, 12:59:01 AMDinwiddie's words came after the fact, he was just filling the air with plausible reasons to explain what transpired, none of them are necessarily true
Dru mentioned twice about things behind closed doors being private, but on the second mention he definitely hinted that he had some heated arguments in that room, presumably with Dinwiddie. Interesting.
Quote from: dd on July 01, 2026, 10:18:00 PMAgree. MOS said in his interview that Brown had a high emotional intelligence...really?? He pouted like a punk when he got demoted, something someone with a low emotional intelligence would do.
No, he took the demotion perfectly well, and tried to befriend and help out Maier.
The "pouting" only happened when it was garbage time and Dinwiddie put in Mr. No-name rookie instead of his expensive #2 -- Dru.
That might be the worst sign of disrespect for a backup QB, especially who used to start. That's Dinwiddie saying "we don't want you here, you have no role".
It was probably on purpose. a) Force Dru to ask for his release to more easily get him out of there, b) to clear up the SMS, c) for the QB you really want (MBT), and... a big one maybe no one thought of...
What if he put Dru in for a couple of series in garbage time and Dru lights it up. That would be disaster for Dinwiddie! That would have fans/press/pundits clamoring for Dru to be starting. "Why isn't Dru who is clearly better not starting", "Dinwiddie is destroying this team, making the wrong decisions". Dinwiddie cares about his rep and his choices and his future control of and direction for the team more than winning right now.
Quote from: dd on July 01, 2026, 10:18:00 PMso wait your turn--your opportunity to start was better in Ottawa than it is in Winnipeg
Nope. Zach goes down for multiple quarters and 1-5 games every season -- especially lately. Dru is basically guaranteed to start this season. Not be "the starter", but still start.
Maier is a mule that never misses a game, never gets hurt, because he never runs (maybe 2 runs in 3 years, including the one in the last game?), and he never waits to pass when a hit is coming in. So Dru is not starting due to Maier injury. And Dinwiddie was never going to switch from Maier to Dru, because once he made that inane choice, he was stuck with Maier -- to save face. The team wouldn't respect him if he said in 5 games "I was wrong, Dru is our starter". And Dinwiddie is all about team respect and control.
Nope, pretty clear Dinwiddie decided in the off-season Dru wasn't going to play and planned the best way to get rid of him. And he pulled it off masterfully, stealing 1-2 1RDPs from us to get what he wanted all along: MBT. Now he'll work on getting Kelly.
Quote from: theaardvark on July 01, 2026, 08:22:43 PMMOS mentioned that last week they had a "day off" yet everyone was in the film room...
If true, that's a good sign. If they're not practicing, lifting, or eating dinner, they should be in that room every other waking moment. That's what I want to see.
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on July 01, 2026, 09:45:16 PMHonestly not a good look on Dru's part telling Dinwiddie he wanted to be released
I think Dru saw the Arbuckle, Jennings, Franklin effect and knows his window to prove he's a starter is short. He's right on the cusp of being a perpetual backup. He's probably watching what Cody is doing/has done as the template to follow. That perennial backup / bubble-quality player always seems to find ways to start, even if he has to go to the worst teams or sit as backup briefly in a city whose starter won't last (like Ford).
I bet there were whispers in the locker room, and guffaws, etc, and maybe players who were never fond of him were getting vocal -- after everyone saw the clear dis/snub when Dinwiddie brought in the no-name QB in garbage time. Like any room, some will pick his side, some will pick against him.
This could be the "distraction" that Dinwiddie was talking about. The BC Rourke/VAJ situation shows you cannot have 2 #1's. (Same in F1, you are in for a lot of pain if you hire 2 #1's.)
Quote from: TBURGESS on July 01, 2026, 01:46:26 PMTechno... I don't think you know what the word "proof" means. You use it when you mean "example" and when you mean a point in favour of your conjecture.
True, thanks. I like hyperbole!
Quote from: Blue In BC on July 01, 2026, 01:37:38 PMI don't think it does and neither does a comparison between Lemon and Sankey who were top performers.
How do you know he's telling suitors the price is steep and who are the suitors if no one is desperate?
Because many teams are starting IMPs who are way less experienced and talented than Teuhema. Why would you do that when you can have a solid middling guy available like Teuhema? Cost. So if Teuhema was ELC (say), he'd be hired. He's not hired, so he's asking "too much".
Quote from: Blue In BC on July 01, 2026, 01:37:38 PMMost teams have other DL on their PR. Bombers seemed to drop the ball for TC after signing Ceresna without finding depth behind him. Same problem at DE.
If they say tomorrow Ceresna is season-ended with ACL or something... what are the odds we sign a couch vet, maybe Teuhema? Basically 99%. Other teams, depth or not, may be in that boat if their superstar gets season-ended. And there's also the window Lemon got signed in -- the "stacking your team for playoff run" time of year.
My impression of Dinwiddie is that he can be pretty crusty.
With the Argos, he publicly said things about his active players, that were just insulting. Whether or not the comments were accurate, why do that in public? What's gained? *** covering maybe.
Successful so far, but He seems pretty unpleasant... the interview I saw in which he attempted to justify trading Dru,was quite awkward.
I'm going with Dru on whatever differences there may be.
Quote from: markf on July 02, 2026, 03:37:31 PMMy impression of Dinwiddie is that he can be pretty crusty.
With the Argos, he publicly said things about his active players, that were just insulting. Whether or not the comments were accurate, why do that in public? What's gained? *** covering maybe.
Successful so far, but He seems pretty unpleasant... the interview I saw in which he attempted to justify trading Dru,was quite awkward.
I'm going with Dru on whatever differences there may be.
agree all
Quote from: Tecno on July 02, 2026, 05:28:22 AMHe specifically said arm strength. I won't argue that Maier can put a lot of heat on short balls -- he probably does have more zip. But Dru has a far prettier deep ball, kind of lack Zach. Real beautiful passes & touch. If it's up to pure distance, I bet Dru out-throws Maier.
That said, this season is being won (so far) by the QBs that can zip in heaters on short passes in tight zone windows. Maier might be better suited to that.
He slammed Dru's arm strength and told lies about Maiers. Yes he can zip a short route. That's it.
Disagree, the deep ball is one of the reasons for the high powered offenses and high score. Sask does love ball control through.
Quote from: Pete on July 02, 2026, 04:44:14 AMIm glad to see Dru here. The negativity is all based on only one guys narrative.. Dinwiddie.
The same guy whose inventing things to justify his decisions.
Pretty classless to put down the guy you traded when all he had to say was Dru wasn't a good fit for the schemes he wants to run
exactly how I feel, well wait, agree all
Quote from: dd on July 02, 2026, 02:45:49 AMBrown turned the ball over way too much last year and dinwiddie decided to go in another direction. It's not a good look when a player quits on a team, shows no integrity
Don't agree with any of this, Dru didn't quit on them, they quit on him. Dru was on a bad team. Yes throws a few ducks but his TDs make up for that. He has plenty of integrity. Dinwiddie lacks that imo.
Quote from: Tecno on July 02, 2026, 05:55:09 AMBecause many teams are starting IMPs who are way less experienced and talented than Teuhema. Why would you do that when you can have a solid middling guy available like Teuhema? Cost. So if Teuhema was ELC (say), he'd be hired. He's not hired, so he's asking "too much".
If they say tomorrow Ceresna is season-ended with ACL or something... what are the odds we sign a couch vet, maybe Teuhema? Basically 99%. Other teams, depth or not, may be in that boat if their superstar gets season-ended. And there's also the window Lemon got signed in -- the "stacking your team for playoff run" time of year.
Teams scout players for TC that they feel have upside. Rookies starting have 2 year minimum deals on ELC deals. Teuhema would probably sign a 1 year deal for more than an ELC but that doesn't mean it's an enormous SMS hit.
Those rookies have been in all of TC and understand the playbook and the ability to communicate with the rest of the defence.
Veterans free agents get signed before TC more than 4 games into the season unless disaster strikes.
Teuhema may have some issues or personality fit. IDK that is the case but there are a myriad of reasons why he hasn't been signed. SMS is only one and probably not the primary one.
I can't think of another import currently a free agent that might be a consideration. Regardless no team has signed him or any other possible candidate similar to his skill set.
Quote from: Tecno on July 02, 2026, 05:42:52 AMNo, he took the demotion perfectly well, and tried to befriend and help out Maier. The "pouting" only happened when it was garbage time and Dinwiddie put in Mr. No-name rookie instead of his expensive #2 -- Dru.
That might be the worst sign of disrespect for a backup QB, especially who used to start. That's Dinwiddie saying "we don't want you here, you have no role".
It was probably on purpose. a) Force Dru to ask for his release to more easily get him out of there, b) to clear up the SMS, c) for the QB you really want (MBT), and... a big one maybe no one thought of...
What if he put Dru in for a couple of series in garbage time and Dru lights it up. That would be disaster for Dinwiddie! That would have fans/press/pundits clamoring for Dru to be starting. "Why isn't Dru who is clearly better not starting", "Dinwiddie is destroying this team, making the wrong decisions". Dinwiddie cares about his rep and his choices and his future control of and direction for the team more than winning right now.
Nope. Zach goes down for multiple quarters and 1-5 games every season -- especially lately. Dru is basically guaranteed to start this season. Not be "the starter", but still start.
Maier is a mule that never misses a game, never gets hurt, because he never runs (maybe 2 runs in 3 years, including the one in the last game?), and he never waits to pass when a hit is coming in. So Dru is not starting due to Maier injury. And Dinwiddie was never going to switch from Maier to Dru, because once he made that inane choice, he was stuck with Maier -- to save face. The team wouldn't respect him if he said in 5 games "I was wrong, Dru is our starter". And Dinwiddie is all about team respect and control.
Nope, pretty clear Dinwiddie decided in the off-season Dru wasn't going to play and planned the best way to get rid of him. And he pulled it off masterfully, stealing 1-2 1RDPs from us to get what he wanted all along: MBT. Now he'll work on getting Kelly.
Good point about Maier's durability, Brown has struggled to stay healthy the last few seasons and seems rather injury prone, it could be Dinwiddie saw him as a more reliable backup rather than a starter, which he may have deduced from his time as a Bomber. We don't know what criteria was used to make the decision, but we do know Brown would have gotten his chance to play sooner or later if Maier under performed and continued to lose games. I watched the RB's lose to the Als on the weekend as expected, I wouldn't point the finger at Maier as the cause of that loss.
It's not likely it was a long devious plan to get rid of Brown after they agreed to pay him a bonus a few months earlier, the opportunity to delete him was readily available on that day. After Brown asked for his release Dinwiddie stated they weren't about to accommodate his request, the only way out was to suspend him or trade him away.
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on July 02, 2026, 05:48:34 PMGood point about Maier's durability, Brown has struggled to stay healthy the last few seasons and seems rather injury prone, it could be Dinwiddie saw him as a more reliable backup rather than a starter, which he may have deduced from his time as a Bomber. We don't know what criteria was used to make the decision, but we do know Brown would have gotten his chance to play sooner or later if Maier under performed and continued to lose games. I watched the RB's lose to the Als on the weekend as expected, I wouldn't point the finger at Maier as the cause of that loss.
It's not likely it was a long devious plan to get rid of Brown after they agreed to pay him a bonus a few months earlier, the opportunity to delete him was readily available on that day. After Brown asked for his release Dinwiddie stated they weren't about to accommodate his request, the only way out was to suspend him or trade him away.
durability is a huge factor here
Here's a video of the helmet to helmet that caused one of Dru's injuries.
Max penalty and fine to the guy that hit him in the face with the crown of his helmet.
I think he was injured one other time while in Ottawa.
https://youtube.com/shorts/rpxlHnUYT3M?is=mMAF3tuf7odEIX4X
Quote from: markf on July 02, 2026, 08:31:39 PMHere's a video of the helmet to helmet that caused one of Dru's injuries.
Max penalty and fine to the guy that hit him in the face with the crown of his helmet.
I think he was injured one other time while in Ottawa.
https://youtube.com/shorts/rpxlHnUYT3M?is=mMAF3tuf7odEIX4X
Yah, that's really bad, a 25 yd. penalty as punishment is a joke. I think it was last year a Bomber defender was also penalized for hitting him in the helmet, but I can't recall who it was.
Putting in #3 instead of Dru was probably the straw that broke the camels back.
And yes, as mentioned, Dinwiddie couldn't put Dru in and have him light it up. Because then his whole reason for starting Maier is out the window. And I would bet dollars to donuts (not sure than saying makes sense anymore, with donuts costing more than a dollar) Dru would have lit it up, big time.
Having MBT in the wings, waiting to take Dru's spot made all this easier for Dinwiddie. Without someone like MBT to step in, Dinwiddie could be in deep if Maier gets injured or worse, starts to really suck.
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on July 02, 2026, 05:48:34 PMI watched the RB's lose to the Als on the weekend as expected, I wouldn't point the finger at Maier as the cause of that loss.
It's not likely it was a long devious plan to get rid of Brown after they agreed to pay him a bonus a few months earlier, the opportunity to delete him was readily available on that day. After Brown asked for his release Dinwiddie stated they weren't about to accommodate his request, the only way out was to suspend him or trade him away.
Sure, Maier didn't "lose" the game... but ask yourself, if Kelly was their QB, might they have won? Dynamic QBs change the entire team. Look at TOR with Arbuckle last year vs them with Kelly this year.
And yes, they could have already known they weren't starting Dru when paying his bonus... thinking they could trade him away. Think about it this way: TOR essentially just bought 1-2 1RDPs for about $175k. Most teams would take that deal in a heartbeat! Especially if it's a throwaway "rebuild" season.
Or, just as likely, they hadn't decided on who their guy was and had a competitive camp. Only after camp they decided Dru wasn't good. And again, they sold his rights for 1-2 1RDPs.
There's really no way Dinwiddie loses here.
Right, Aards. And if Maier sucks and he switches to MBT, he can say he wanted MBT all along but couldn't until he shed Dru.
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on July 02, 2026, 08:43:47 PMYah, that's really bad, a 25 yd. penalty as punishment is a joke. I think it was last year a Bomber defender was also penalized for hitting him in the helmet, but I can't recall who it was.
TONY JONES, he was also fined for the infraction.
Quote from: Tecno on July 02, 2026, 11:43:22 PMSure, Maier didn't "lose" the game... but ask yourself, if Kelly was their QB, might they have won? Dynamic QBs change the entire team. Look at TOR with Arbuckle last year vs them with Kelly this year.
And yes, they could have already known they weren't starting Dru when paying his bonus... thinking they could trade him away. Think about it this way: TOR essentially just bought 1-2 1RDPs for about $175k. Most teams would take that deal in a heartbeat! Especially if it's a throwaway "rebuild" season.
Or, just as likely, they hadn't decided on who their guy was and had a competitive camp. Only after camp they decided Dru wasn't good. And again, they sold his rights for 1-2 1RDPs.
There's really no way Dinwiddie loses here.
convoluted/ˈkɒnvəluːtɪd/
Convoluted means extremely intricate, coiled, or needlessly complicated to the point of being difficult to follow. It comes from the Latin word convolutus, meaning "rolled up together", and is typically used to describe things that are unreasonably tangled, both literally and figuratively.
Simplistic Thinking. Lower-order thinking. Looking only at what is immediately ahead of you.
vs
Higher-level thinking. Planning 3 moves ahead. Outsmarting opponents.
See also: Sun Tzu
Quote from: Tecno on July 02, 2026, 11:45:29 PMRight, Aards. And if Maier sucks and he switches to MBT, he can say he wanted MBT all along but couldn't until he shed Dru.
MBT was available when he signed Maier, so that kinda invalidates this concept...
He could have cut Dru and signed both Maier and MBT and not spent the $150 roster bonus, effectively paying for MBT for free.
Quote from: theaardvark on July 04, 2026, 04:59:10 PMMBT was available when he signed Maier, so that kinda invalidates this concept...
He could have cut Dru and signed both Maier and MBT and not spent the $150 roster bonus, effectively paying for MBT for free.
That's easy: he didn't know Dru was useless (in his eyes) until he worked with him through a TC. Dinwiddie had never worked with Dru before. Maybe on TV Dru looks like someone he can work with, but when you actually get on the field with him you find out you can't.
And the point isn't whether he's right or lying or whatever, the point is Dinwiddie can get away with that narrative -- he won't lose face, or lose the respect of his team or fans.
If I had to guess, I'd say he sees that Dru can be effective on the field and is fairly smart, but what he didn't know until he did TC was that Dru is like Kimi Raikonen: he's an even keel with zero fire. He'll hype up the guys even less than Zach does.
Quote from: Tecno on July 05, 2026, 12:07:59 AMThat's easy: he didn't know Dru was useless (in his eyes) until he worked with him through a TC. Dinwiddie had never worked with Dru before. Maybe on TV Dru looks like someone he can work with, but when you actually get on the field with him you find out you can't.
And the point isn't whether he's right or lying or whatever, the point is Dinwiddie can get away with that narrative -- he won't lose face, or lose the respect of his team or fans.
If I had to guess, I'd say he sees that Dru can be effective on the field and is fairly smart, but what he didn't know until he did TC was that Dru is like Kimi Raikonen: he's an even keel with zero fire. He'll hype up the guys even less than Zach does.
How many games did Dinwiddie coach AGAINST Dru? How much time did he have in the film room. Its not like he was an unknown before TC.
Quote from: theaardvark on July 05, 2026, 12:57:11 AMHow many games did Dinwiddie coach AGAINST Dru? How much time did he have in the film room. Its not like he was an unknown before TC.
And yet there remains the sticky problem of there being no other explanation for why he paid the $150k bonus rather than cutting the QB he never wanted...
He's not stupid. So what could another explanation be? Was it WPG wasn't interested in the trade until we saw Elgersma wasn't starting this year?? And Dinwiddie was playing the long game betting we'd be calling in-season and willing to give up our 1RDP's for the foreseeable future?
I give Dinwiddie a lot of credit as a highbrain... but that might be a bridge too far.
Quote from: Tecno on July 05, 2026, 01:05:50 AMAnd yet there remains the sticky problem of there being no other explanation for why he paid the $150k bonus rather than cutting the QB he never wanted...
He's not stupid. So what could another explanation be? Was it WPG wasn't interested in the trade until we saw Elgersma wasn't starting this year?? And Dinwiddie was playing the long game betting we'd be calling in-season and willing to give up our 1RDP's for the foreseeable future?
I give Dinwiddie a lot of credit as a highbrain... but that might be a bridge too far.
Have you ever played competitive sports? Nobody involved in football or hockey is what you would call high-brained, they're blood spitting knuckle draggers of low intellect. LaPo is as close as you'd get to being a brain scientist.
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on July 05, 2026, 01:57:29 AMHave you ever played competitive sports? Nobody involved in football or hockey is what you would call high-brained, they're blood spitting knuckle draggers of low intellect. LaPo is as close as you'd get to being a brain scientist.
No comment on the premise... I don't want to get in trouble, not do I want to upset all the jocks here. :o
But there are varying levels of intelligence in the CFL; yes, probably with Lapo and Condell types at the top. But you don't have to be Einstein to be "highbrained" enough to think up winning football. You just have to be better than the opponent.
As for Dinwiddie: he's an ex-QB, and those are most often the smartest guys on the field. That's why they are QB. After seeing what Dinwiddie did to us in the GC with a masterful plan & prep with useless Arbuckle, I have no doubt he's a highbrain.
Quote from: Tecno on July 05, 2026, 07:44:15 AMNo comment on the premise... I don't want to get in trouble, not do I want to upset all the jocks here. :o
But there are varying levels of intelligence in the CFL; yes, probably with Lapo and Condell types at the top. But you don't have to be Einstein to be "highbrained" enough to think up winning football. You just have to be better than the opponent.
As for Dinwiddie: he's an ex-QB, and those are most often the smartest guys on the field. That's why they are QB. After seeing what Dinwiddie did to us in the GC with a masterful plan & prep with useless Arbuckle, I have no doubt he's a highbrain.
Disagree about Arbuckle, he throws a better ball than Zach and is easier to re-program, with the right OC he can be effective. Straight up I'd make that trade.
I think motivation and execution are bigger factors in team success than scheme, the team that plays well with more enthusiasm is usually the one that comes out on top, and enthusiasm has to come from the players it can't be programmed from the top down. Notice this mostly in Sask and Montreal and now in Edmonton, those guys are having fun flying around making plays on both sides of the ball.
I can see over time how Wpg. has lost this edge, Hardrick, Harris and Bailey were boisterous individuals, most of the current crew is subdued, some barely cracking a smile, Zach brings none of that energy and Brady tries to pump things up but it usually gets washed away.
Not sure they have much enthusiasm on Defence either, Willy is kind of in it for his own glory and Kramdi is usually telling other players where to line up with the bark of a harsh school teacher, as far as I can tell Nichols and Holm are deep introverts. Could be lessons are taken super seriously and boisterousness is discouraged by O'Shea who is super conservative by nature, they may dictate the team personality they want but the restraint doesn't pay off on the field. They ain't a loose crew.
Those that said we should have waited to pay a lower price for Dru got the micro on turbo defrost. We are looking like geniuses now.
Quote from: Blueforlife on July 07, 2026, 02:37:33 AMThose that said we should have waited to pay a lower price for Dru got the micro on turbo defrost. We are looking like geniuses now.
Still not a sure thing. The main thing we've accomplished, serendipitously, is we've kept HAM from acquiring Dru. Assuming they aren't happy with the somewhat expensive Ford/Dolegala room as it is.
If we can actually use Dru (now or next year) then it's a good move, or if we ream HAM for more DPs than we had to pay in a trade, then it's a great move!
Quote from: Tecno on July 07, 2026, 02:42:07 AMStill not a sure thing. The main thing we've accomplished, serendipitously, is we've kept HAM from acquiring Dru. Assuming they aren't happy with the somewhat expensive Ford/Dolegala room as it is.
If we can actually use Dru (now or next year) then it's a good move, or if we ream HAM for more DPs than we had to pay in a trade, then it's a great move!
based on how fragile Zac is looking not only this year but last, it was a pretty good bet that we would need a backup to win some games for us. Im more confident in Dru doing that than our other qbs. (apologies to Taylor but he didn't show much to indicate that against a starting qb we would be successful)
Quote from: Pete on July 07, 2026, 02:50:47 AMIm more confident in Dru doing that than our other qbs.
Totally. But what if Zach's IR stints are all front-loaded this year and in 5 weeks when Dru is "ready" with the book Zach goes on an injury-free streak the rest of the season? It's possible. Good insurance to have, but it's like dying with new life insurance during the probationary/no-payout period.
And I cite the "5 weeks" number because I think it was 5-6 weeks from the Zach trade to him starting our last reg season game. No reason why this wouldn't be similar.
Quote from: Tecno on July 07, 2026, 02:55:03 AMTotally. But what if Zach's IR stints are all front-loaded this year and in 5 weeks when Dru is "ready" with the book Zach goes on an injury-free streak the rest of the season? It's possible. Good insurance to have, but it's like dying with new life insurance during the probationary/no-payout period.
And I cite the "5 weeks" number because I think it was 5-6 weeks from the Zach trade to him starting our last reg season game. No reason why this wouldn't be similar.
It was 19 days. And Zach had never worked with LaPolice before as an OC.
Quote from: bunker on July 07, 2026, 03:03:37 AMIt was 19 days. And Zach had never worked with LaPolice before as an OC.
Hmm, it would appear you are right. It wasn't 5 weeks. It was 2 sat-out games from signing to playing, or roughly 3 weeks:
benched Oct 11
benched Oct 19
starts Oct 25
I thought it was a bit longer. I remember everyone freaking out at the time after that WPG 33 CGY 37 loss Oct 19 that we had Zach in-house but weren't starting him. However, we may have rushed Zach sooner than Mafia wanted because we absolutely had to get him in a game before the playoffs started, and that was the last reg season game.
Ok, so if we give Dru a 1 week edge because he knows WFC and Condell, then yes, we could possibly start him this week. Even though all the last-week pressers said there was no rush and no thoughts about it.
But, because there is still no rush (plenty of games left), we could still see them keep Dru undressed. Heck, it could be the plan is to roll with Elgersma as #2 as much as we can, and only bring Dru in if Zach is hurt and Elgersma loses.
I'm pretty sure Mafia is pleased as punch right now Elgersma did everything he was asked to do, and did it very well.
With a derth of QB's coming available, and so many injured, one would think that Walters wants to sign Dru before FA starts, but I wouldn't fault Dru for dipping his toes, at least in the tamper period.
The only way he signs before free agency is if Zach is retiring, and Walters gives him starting money, guaranteed.
He should easily get a starting contract somewhere, he won't waste a year hoping to get in behind Zach.
Telling you guys. Dru is Kimi reincarnated as a QB (ya, Kimi's not dead, but don't ruin my talking point!):
Kimi just won his first F1 race ever:
https://youtu.be/qqB6Iz1iaE8?t=7
vs
Dru getting ready for a big game against his old team:
I'm not saying this is bad. Kimi won a whackton of races. But it certainly is amusing! And odd.