Blue Bombers Forum

The Extra Point => Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum => Topic started by: Pete on January 24, 2026, 08:15:34 PM

Title: wr replacement
Post by: Pete on January 24, 2026, 08:15:34 PM
https://3downnation.com/2026/01/24/tim-white-hamilton-tiger-cats-mutually-agree-to-part-ways/
Would be ideal replacement for Schoen.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Jesse on January 24, 2026, 08:21:24 PM
Yes we need to add some juice to our receiving core, so it may be an ideal fit.

But with all our high paid vets, we are not going to be successful unless we find some impact players on their rookie deals.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Blue In BC on January 24, 2026, 08:30:09 PM
He was paid $224K last season so SMS is a huge question. He'll be 31 in July and not the biggest receiver we might consider.

I suppose speaking with his agent wouldn't hurt but I'm guessing he wants more than last year.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Jesse on January 24, 2026, 08:39:15 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 24, 2026, 08:30:09 PMHe was paid $224K last season so SMS is a huge question. He'll be 31 in July and not the biggest receiver we might consider.

I suppose speaking with his agent wouldn't hurt but I'm guessing he wants more than last year.

I'm sure the receiving core has room for one more big contract in the budget. Only have Demski right now.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 24, 2026, 08:44:41 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 24, 2026, 08:30:09 PMHe was paid $224K last season so SMS is a huge question. He'll be 31 in July and not the biggest receiver we might consider.

I suppose speaking with his agent wouldn't hurt but I'm guessing he wants more than last year.

He's not into blocking and drops plenty of passes, after Dillon Mitchell I'd vote no thanks.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Pete on January 24, 2026, 09:03:46 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 24, 2026, 08:44:41 PMHe's not into blocking and drops plenty of passes, after Dillon Mitchell I'd vote no thanks.
except he had 4 consecutive 1000 yard receiving seasons (ave of 1178 yards), and played 17-18 games in each. Not sure who else will be available, Hardy is 34, KeeSean Johnson would be a candidate if hes available .
Right now we have two import spots available its ok to fill one with a rookie but the other needs to be a proven top reciever. Last year we tried a number of guys and look where we are now.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 24, 2026, 10:15:50 PM
Quote from: Pete on January 24, 2026, 09:03:46 PMexcept he had 4 consecutive 1000 yard receiving seasons (ave of 1178 yards), and played 17-18 games in each. Not sure who else will be available, Hardy is 34, KeeSean Johnson would be a candidate if hes available .
Right now we have two import spots available its ok to fill one with a rookie but the other needs to be a proven top reciever. Last year we tried a number of guys and look where we are now.

My preference would be to sign a big receiver, but not many on the list other than Dominique Rhymes, who's probably fishing for $250k.

(https://i.postimg.cc/RFZXgywn/Screenshot-2026-01-21-083739.png)

https://postimg.cc/B8RT6hYq (https://postimg.cc/B8RT6hYq)
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: dd on January 24, 2026, 10:34:04 PM
I ve always liked Steven dunbar, he's produced everywhere he's played, I d take a run at him if calgary doesn't re sign him
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Pete on January 24, 2026, 11:14:25 PM
the thing that worries me about Dunbar and Rhymes is that teams don't try to re-sign them. To me that is a red flag. They do produce but seem to lack consistency.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: bunker on January 24, 2026, 11:22:47 PM
Quote from: dd on January 24, 2026, 10:34:04 PMI ve always liked Steven dunbar, he's produced everywhere he's played, I d take a run at him if calgar doesn't re sign him
I agree he'd be a good get, provided he's healthy. He had a  knee injury in August and never returned. I'd be very happy with K Johnson from the riders also.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Blueforlife on January 24, 2026, 11:45:35 PM
Pass too $
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: VictorRomano on January 25, 2026, 01:13:06 AM
Robustelli would be a guy I'd bring in.  Was pretty decent in Sask last year.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Jesse on January 25, 2026, 01:42:05 AM
Quote from: VictorRomano on January 25, 2026, 01:13:06 AMRobustelli would be a guy I'd bring in.  Was pretty decent in Sask last year.

I don't know. Got a lot of attention due to his last name. Seemed a bit overhyped, imo.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 25, 2026, 05:43:12 AM
Quote from: Jesse on January 25, 2026, 01:42:05 AMI don't know. Got a lot of attention due to his last name. Seemed a bit overhyped, imo.

Robustelli doesn't have the skills to be a #1 receiver, but he is a scrappy playmaker who could fit in as a #3 or #4 at the right price. 
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: dd on January 25, 2026, 06:11:19 PM
Ya, to me Robuste11i is the same type of receiver as Sterns is, pass.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Blue In BC on January 25, 2026, 06:17:11 PM
Quote from: dd on January 25, 2026, 06:11:19 PMYa, to me Robuste11i is the same type of receiver as Sterns is, pass.

He's 8" taller and nearly 40 lbs heavier. That's a big difference.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Pigskin on January 25, 2026, 06:25:55 PM
Robustelli: 6'3" 220. 12 games, 38/544 3 TDs, 14.3 avg.

Sterns:  5'8" 183, 14 games, 48/530 4 TDs, 11.0 avg.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Pete on January 25, 2026, 06:59:06 PM
if were looking more for a big body replacement Shemar Bridges 6 ft 4 , 208 lbs might be a good choice. He had significant drop from his rookie year but that may be because of Lawler, White and Kiondre Smith in the same receiving core.
Pair him with cdn reciever Gittens jr or Brisset and its a big upgrade
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 25, 2026, 11:38:05 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on January 25, 2026, 06:25:55 PMRobustelli: 6'3" 220. 12 games, 38/544 3 TDs, 14.3 avg.

Sterns:  5'8" 183, 14 games, 48/530 4 TDs, 11.0 avg.

I had no idea Robustelli was that big, that's good news, puts him in direct competition with players like Tonmmy Nield and Clercius with the passport disadvantage. 

Whoever said Robustelli = Sterns, is dead wrong, Sterns is slick and efficient, Robustelli is a raw playmaker.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Tecno on January 26, 2026, 02:05:01 AM
Quote from: Pete on January 24, 2026, 08:15:34 PMhttps://3downnation.com/2026/01/24/tim-white-hamilton-tiger-cats-mutually-agree-to-part-ways/
Would be ideal replacement for Schoen.

Meh.  Prima donna.  Wanted to be the highest paid CFL REC.  Thought he was Kenny, then they were on the same team and we saw who was better.

Definitely not a team-first or FIFO guy.  Doesn't seem like a Mafia fit.

Also, he's another home-run hitter, and if we re-sign Wheatie we'll once again already have enough of these.  We need a short crosser guy, not another lanky slugger.

I also worry why HAM almost always chose to make him DNA, allowing him only 23/25 snaps, instead of just starting him legit like most teams would.  Is there something about him that makes him incapable of playing every down?

Also, don't rule Schoen out just yet.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Pete on January 26, 2026, 02:24:04 AM
Quote from: Tecno on January 26, 2026, 02:05:01 AMMeh.  Prima donna.  Wanted to be the highest paid CFL REC.  Thought he was Kenny, then they were on the same team and we saw who was better.

Definitely not a team-first or FIFO guy.  Doesn't seem like a Mafia fit.

Also, he's another home-run hitter, and if we re-sign Wheatie we'll once again already have enough of these.  We need a short crosser guy, not another lanky slugger.

I also worry why HAM almost always chose to make him DNA, allowing him only 23/25 snaps, instead of just starting him legit like most teams would.  Is there something about him that makes him incapable of playing every down?

Also, don't rule Schoen out just yet.
have you listened to Lawler or Lewis, every top reciever has an ego. If you look at the last 4 years I wouldnt be surprized if White has the most yards in receptions.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Tecno on January 26, 2026, 02:50:09 AM
Quote from: Pete on January 26, 2026, 02:24:04 AMhave you listened to Lawler or Lewis, every top reciever has an ego. If you look at the last 4 years I wouldnt be surprized if White has the most yards in receptions.

For sure.  But White didn't have the hands to back it up.  He can't do even 1/10th the circus Kenny can.  Most of White's stats are from home-run hits where he uses his speed, and gets some YAC.  Yes, that's valid and useful, but when you get fast DBs blanketing him he's proven to be less effective.  (What did White do against us in the '25 HAM games??)

Kenny sure talked smack, but that was just Kenny.  And his gumby body control and Burnham hands backed it up.  Excludes his injuries and he likely would out-do White in YDS too.

I've never heard smack from Gino.  He may say he's the best (I don't know) but he is 10X humbler than the above 2 guys, that's for sure.

If I had to pick one to offer $275+ to right now, it'd be Gino.  Dude can take punishment in the middle AND hit homeruns AND his hands are nearly as good as Kenny.  And I bet he's a better FIFO in WPG than the other 2 ever could hope to be.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Pete on January 26, 2026, 04:17:31 AM
Lewis has already re-signed in Ottawa, and no way any ones paying White 275 k, but 200k isnt out of question for perennial 1000 yd receiver
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: LXTSN on January 26, 2026, 03:43:12 PM
Rambo would be the ideal target in my opinion. Very versatile, never been their WR1 but is a great weapon for MTL.
I also like Shamar Bridges as a more budget option. He took a step back but the Ticats have a loaded WR room! We could use him for a big redzone threat.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: gbill2004 on January 26, 2026, 04:23:41 PM
Als just released Austin Mack.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: BBRT on January 26, 2026, 04:46:10 PM
Quote from: gbill2004 on January 26, 2026, 04:23:41 PMAls just released Austin Mack.

This one I would love to see in Bomber Blue!
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Blue In BC on January 26, 2026, 05:17:58 PM
Quote from: BBRT on January 26, 2026, 04:46:10 PMThis one I would love to see in Bomber Blue!

We should be giving his agent a call. If he's healthy then he's a viable choice. I doubt he remains a free agent for long.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: GOLDMEMBER on January 26, 2026, 05:32:05 PM
Quote from: VictorRomano on January 25, 2026, 01:13:06 AMRobustelli would be a guy I'd bring in.  Was pretty decent in Sask last year.

I'm a fan.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: GOLDMEMBER on January 26, 2026, 05:33:34 PM
Quote from: gbill2004 on January 26, 2026, 04:23:41 PMAls just released Austin Mack.

I would pay for Mack. Outstanding player.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: theaardvark on January 26, 2026, 06:59:02 PM
Isn't Mack struggling with the injury bug of late?
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 26, 2026, 07:07:23 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 26, 2026, 06:59:02 PMIsn't Mack struggling with the injury bug of late?

He's only played 15 games (https://www.cfl.ca/players/austin-mack) over the last two years.

Maybe he's worth a look at the right price. His durability is a question mark, though.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: theaardvark on January 26, 2026, 07:10:58 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on January 26, 2026, 07:07:23 PMHe's only played 15 games (https://www.cfl.ca/players/austin-mack) over the last two years.

Maybe he's worth a look at the right price. His durability is a question mark, though.

Iguess we could sign a bunch of injury prone WR's without bonuses, and not be shy with the 6 game...  Mack, Schoen to start...
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 26, 2026, 07:12:55 PM
Quote from: gbill2004 on January 26, 2026, 04:23:41 PMAls just released Austin Mack.

Strange decision, but could be salary or ratio related, they have Philpot, Snead and Spieker and a bunch of "who's that?" under contract, maybe they bring Rambo back as a savings.  Rambo is a raw energy guy like KSB, drops a few easy balls but usually makes things happen after the catch.

Edit: See they re-upped Alexander Hollins as well.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Blueforlife on January 26, 2026, 08:45:11 PM
Mack must be damaged goods, a love him but will be moderate risk and high cost, not my cup of tea.

Also chance he was due some major cake
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Pete on January 26, 2026, 09:59:00 PM
Walters job must ne harder than I thought it seems like there is no clear choice other than we need a top receiver There is a great variance in opinions.
seems Mack is either a great choice or too much injury risk
Schoen has too many injury questions
White drops too many but has put up good numbers
Robustelli is either overrated or has great potential
Bridges Dunbar and Rambo are too inconsistent but others think that in right offence could produce
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Blue In BC on January 26, 2026, 10:04:41 PM
Quote from: Blueforlife on January 26, 2026, 08:45:11 PMMack must be damaged goods, a love him but will be moderate risk and high cost, not my cup of tea.

Also chance he was due some major cake

He was due to earn $210K with $45K up front. That isn't horrible money but injury history may well be the issue. That injury seemed to be around mid season so I don't get the logic for his release.

We'll see if he gets an offer somewhere.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Blueforlife on January 26, 2026, 10:12:30 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 26, 2026, 10:04:41 PMHe was due to earn $210K with $45K up front. That isn't horrible money but injury history may well be the issue. That injury seemed to be around mid season so I don't get the logic for his release.

We'll see if he gets an offer somewhere.
yeah too much cake, I would go at 175 but who wouldn't LOL, someone will pay him closer to 2

that's a big bonus, I take the damaged goods comment back, just injury history and high price tag, we have found out who that goes :(

I would pay 250 with half on heavy incentives but he wouldn't do that I would think, I wouldn't do any guaranteed $, a good talent, sure hope he finds a home, hasn't been the same since he left for NFL was it?
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Blue In BC on January 26, 2026, 10:15:25 PM
Quote from: Blueforlife on January 26, 2026, 10:12:30 PMyeah too much cake, I would go at 175 but who wouldn't LOL

that's a big bonus, I take the damaged goods comment back, just injury history and high price tag, we have found out who that goes :(

He has 1 less option now and some teams don't need receiver help. I'm not sure which teams might be interested. The large amount of up front money is probably off the table for every team.

The 28-year-old was scheduled to receive $45,000 on February 1, the first part of a contract worth $211,000 in hard money for 2026. While general manager Danny Maciocia indicated earlier this month that the Alouettes could find a way to fit that deal under the salary cap if they so chose, he ultimately made the decision to part ways with Mack.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Blueforlife on January 26, 2026, 10:15:57 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 26, 2026, 10:15:25 PMHe has 1 less option now and some teams don't need receiver help. I'm not sure which teams might be interested. The large amount of up front money is probably off the table for every team.
agree, I did my normal edits and talked about the same LOL
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Blue In BC on January 26, 2026, 10:26:29 PM
I wouldn't rule out interest from the Bombers. There isn't any guarantee we can upgrade receiver during free agency. So this is an early choice. Wheatfall and Sterns haven't been re-signed yet so I have no idea what the plan is yet.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: dd on January 26, 2026, 10:48:24 PM
We don't need another high priced injury prone reciever, Schoen is enough to dea1 with and I doubt he comes back. If we sign a WR, he'd better be 100% heathy, sorry, not interested in Mack even at a reduced rate, as his hamstring is going to go again.

Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Jesse on January 26, 2026, 11:12:31 PM
Quote from: dd on January 26, 2026, 10:48:24 PMWe don't need another high priced injury prone reciever, Schoen is enough to dea1 with and I doubt he comes back. If we sign a WR, he'd better be 100% heathy, sorry, not interested in Mack even at a reduced rate, as his hamstring is going to go again.



We need at least two receivers and everyone has something in the negative column.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 26, 2026, 11:41:14 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 26, 2026, 11:12:31 PMWe need at least two receivers and everyone has something in the negative column.

Age, health and upside should be taken into consideration, gamble on a receiver or two that haven't peaked yet or received elite receiver pay of $200k+.  Maybe they become elite receivers, maybe they plateau, but keep Sterns and Wheatfall around on a budget just in case they don't work out.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: BLUEBOMBER on January 27, 2026, 08:50:44 AM
No tim White please
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Jesse on January 27, 2026, 10:39:28 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 26, 2026, 11:41:14 PMAge, health and upside should be taken into consideration, gamble on a receiver or two that haven't peaked yet or received elite receiver pay of $200k+.  Maybe they become elite receivers, maybe they plateau, but keep Sterns and Wheatfall around on a budget just in case they don't work out.

Sounds like a repeat of last year.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: kkc60 on January 27, 2026, 02:39:48 PM
Mack would be a great signing
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Tecno on January 27, 2026, 05:30:50 PM
Mack was supposed to be the next Kenny, and then proceeds to get outclassed by Snead, Rambo, Philpot.  That's not a good look.  Mack is worth no more than Rambo money at this point.

He, frankly, doesn't interest me at all.  He lost his mojo down south, as CFL WRs are wont to do.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 27, 2026, 07:06:21 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 27, 2026, 10:39:28 AMSounds like a repeat of last year.

Sure, but nothing wrong with that strategy, just examine the merchandise closely before purchase this time.  Pretty obvious Mitchell had some red flags in his past that should have been investigated, the dumbest thing they did was letting Reggie White walk while holding onto Mitchell for the entire season.  I hope they learned something.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: theaardvark on January 27, 2026, 07:13:41 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 27, 2026, 07:06:21 PMSure, but nothing wrong with that strategy, just examine the merchandise closely before purchase this time.  Pretty obvious Mitchell had some red flags in his past that should have been investigated, the dumbest thing they did was letting Reggie White walk while holding onto Mitchell for the entire season.  I hope they learned something.

Yeah, they let Reggie go and then he lights it up... oh wait.

Mack, if healthy, can be outstanding.  If he can't find a taker (he will), and is available for camp at an ELC+ performance bonuses contract (he won't be), we'd be stupid not to sign him.

Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: blue_or_die on January 27, 2026, 10:50:44 PM
I'd bet on him having a bounce back year. I'd even go as far as advocating we pay him like a #1 (no, not 300k) but make this our big FA signing.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Tecno on January 27, 2026, 11:40:17 PM
Quote from: blue_or_die on January 27, 2026, 10:50:44 PMI'd bet on him having a bounce back year. I'd even go as far as advocating we pay him like a #1 (no, not 300k) but make this our big FA signing.

If Mack wasn't doing squat in '25 with that wunderkind QB and league top-2 OL, then he probably ain't gonna do much with Zach (limited range) and a '25 WPG-level OL.  Maybe if our OL becomes league-top again... Maybe.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 27, 2026, 11:55:09 PM
Quote from: blue_or_die on January 27, 2026, 10:50:44 PMI'd bet on him having a bounce back year. I'd even go as far as advocating we pay him like a #1 (no, not 300k) but make this our big FA signing.

I wouldn't mind if they made a serious committment to making Pokey #1, nothing lacking in his arsenal except a QB that can get him the ball in open space.  He has very deceptive skills that make him hard to compare to other receivers or easily categorize.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Tecno on January 27, 2026, 11:59:37 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 27, 2026, 11:55:09 PMI wouldn't mind if they made a serious committment to making Pokey #1, nothing lacking in his arsenal except a QB that can get him the ball in open space.

Can he be that and still be out wide?  (Well, I guess Kenny was, but was he the definitive #1 read every time?)

Or do we have to move Pokey into the slot.

Based on 2025 performance, I don't see how Demski isn't our ostensible #1.  Pokey can do more circus a la Kenny, but Demski gives you more flexibility in routes (like more short options).

And do we need to name a "#1" (even if unspoken, and de facto)?  Clearly Pokey would be the #1 IMP, even if Schoen re-ups.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Pete on January 28, 2026, 01:10:30 AM
How about signing both Schoen and Mack to incentive laden contracts.
We'd have a quality wr in the lineup until Schoen gets healthy, and Schoen as insurance if Mack underperforms or is hurt. If they both end up healthy and performing we could also trade one if the cap is an issue
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Jesse on January 28, 2026, 01:46:07 AM
Quote from: Pete on January 28, 2026, 01:10:30 AMHow about signing both Schoen and Mack to incentive laden contracts.
We'd have a quality wr in the lineup until Schoen gets healthy, and Schoen as insurance if Mack underperforms or is hurt. If they both end up healthy and performing we could also trade one if the cap is an issue

I don't think Mack's coming in at a discount. He's in talks with multiple teams at the moment.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 28, 2026, 01:56:17 AM
Quote from: Jesse on January 28, 2026, 01:46:07 AMI don't think Mack's coming in at a discount. He's in talks with multiple teams at the moment.

Yep, a lot of these elite receivers will command a hefty salary to sign, which makes some of them a pretty big risk if they can't produce up to expectations, which is something that happens almost every year around thge league.  Actually pretty rare for the top paid receivers put up the best numbers.   
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: theaardvark on January 28, 2026, 03:03:03 PM
If Mack waits for TC, and doesn't have an aversion to a medical exam, that's probably where he gets a payday.

After a team finds out they either didn't bring enough talent to camp, has a vet mot show up (literally, or mentally/physically) or loses someone to injury, he suddenly becomes a hot commodity.

So signing now for an incentive laden no bonus deal doesn't make a lot of sense.

Not saying a Pinball or Hervey that won't give him big bucks and bonuses right now, though.  THAT is what he should grab onto.  Otherwise, he should wait.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 28, 2026, 05:02:26 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 28, 2026, 03:03:03 PMIf Mack waits for TC, and doesn't have an aversion to a medical exam, that's probably where he gets a payday.

After a team finds out they either didn't bring enough talent to camp, has a vet mot show up (literally, or mentally/physically) or loses someone to injury, he suddenly becomes a hot commodity.

So signing now for an incentive laden no bonus deal doesn't make a lot of sense.

Not saying a Pinball or Hervey that won't give him big bucks and bonuses right now, though.  THAT is what he should grab onto.  Otherwise, he should wait.

Hervey doesn't like over paying receivers, linebackers or running backs, if they ask for too much he moves on with their replacements.  Just ask Gino.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Ridermania on January 28, 2026, 06:36:43 PM
Riders have released receiver Shawn Bane Jr.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: LXTSN on January 28, 2026, 07:38:58 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on January 28, 2026, 06:36:43 PMRiders have released receiver Shawn Bane Jr.
He's one guy I was thinking about too. It seems like Saskatchewan has done a great job collecting game changing receivers. Hamilton, Toronto, Montreal and BC have all been great at that actually. I suppose we get one every now and then too. Pokey and Schoen most recently. I like Wheatfall, but I wouldn't categorize him as "game-changing"
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Pigskin on January 28, 2026, 07:46:52 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on January 28, 2026, 06:36:43 PMRiders have released receiver Shawn Bane Jr.

Another player that can't stay healthy. 
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: DCM on January 29, 2026, 01:19:50 AM
Bombers just tweeted a white picture with #FFFFFF. Tim White to the Bombers?

Edit: NVM, he's signed.

https://x.com/Wpg_BlueBombers/status/2016697587303403612
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Jesse on January 29, 2026, 01:24:02 AM
Quote from: DCM on January 29, 2026, 01:19:50 AMBombers just tweeted a white picture with #FFFFFF. Tim White to the Bombers?

Edit: NVM, he's signed.

https://x.com/Wpg_BlueBombers/status/2016697587303403612

I like it. Durable, productive receiver that's worked with Condell before.

Perfect match.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: theaardvark on January 29, 2026, 05:12:50 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 28, 2026, 03:03:03 PMIf Mack waits for TC, and doesn't have an aversion to a medical exam, that's probably where he gets a payday.

After a team finds out they either didn't bring enough talent to camp, has a vet mot show up (literally, or mentally/physically) or loses someone to injury, he suddenly becomes a hot commodity.

So signing now for an incentive laden no bonus deal doesn't make a lot of sense.

Not saying a Pinball or Hervey that won't give him big bucks and bonuses right now, though.  THAT is what he should grab onto.  Otherwise, he should wait.

Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 28, 2026, 05:02:26 PMHervey doesn't like over paying receivers, linebackers or running backs, if they ask for too much he moves on with their replacements.  Just ask Gino.

From Ridermania's post:

"https://3downnation.com/2026/01/29/edmonton-elks-sign-receiver-austin-mack-after-release-from-montreal-alouettes-sources/

Dan Ralph reports: "Hearing WR Austin Mack's two-year deal with Edmonton is for $425k in hard money with a max value of $439k and includes a $55k signing bonus. "



Well... I guess that one didn't age well...

Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 29, 2026, 06:13:15 PM
Fajardo and Mack have some history in Montreal if I'm not mistaken. But the Elks gotta hope the latter can stay healthy.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: blue_or_die on January 29, 2026, 07:51:39 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 29, 2026, 05:12:50 PMFrom Ridermania's post:

"https://3downnation.com/2026/01/29/edmonton-elks-sign-receiver-austin-mack-after-release-from-montreal-alouettes-sources/

Dan Ralph reports: "Hearing WR Austin Mack's two-year deal with Edmonton is for $425k in hard money with a max value of $439k and includes a $55k signing bonus. "



Well... I guess that one didn't age well...



Does Mack also play starting QB at the same time for that money??
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: theaardvark on January 29, 2026, 08:01:57 PM
Quote from: blue_or_die on January 29, 2026, 07:51:39 PMDoes Mack also play starting QB at the same time for that money??

Pretty sure that's the 2 year total deal... but hey, Hervey...
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: dd on January 29, 2026, 11:02:32 PM
He'11 be on the 6 game IR before Ju1y 1
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Blueforlife on January 30, 2026, 02:06:24 AM
If healthy Mack will earn his cake like Lawler did, hope he does, fun to watch, I wouldn't have paid that price
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Blue In BC on January 30, 2026, 05:08:50 PM
Quote from: Blueforlife on January 30, 2026, 02:06:24 AMIf healthy Mack will earn his cake like Lawler did, hope he does, fun to watch, I wouldn't have paid that price

It's the same price we paid for White and I think a healthy Mack has more upside. He's aslo 4" and 35 lbs heavier which may make him a better blocker.

White is only 5'9" and 175 lbs. Receivers that can / will block was an issue last year.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: theaardvark on January 30, 2026, 05:20:57 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 30, 2026, 05:08:50 PMIt's the same price we paid for White and I think a healthy Mack has more upside. He's aslo 4" and 35 lbs heavier which may make him a better blocker.

White is only 5'9" and 175 lbs. Receivers that can / will block was an issue last year.
Upside? 

Sure, but the downside is huge as well.

White has proven reliability of being on the roster, and consistent production.

I can see why the decision was made.

Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Blue In BC on January 30, 2026, 05:26:11 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 30, 2026, 05:20:57 PMUpside? 

Sure, but the downside is huge as well.

White has proven reliability of being on the roster, and consistent production.

I can see why the decision was made.



Yes upside. Yes he's had some injury issues but who hasn't?  Are you basing the downside on that factor? I like White and he also can serve as a returner if necessary so he has some additional skills.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Jesse on January 30, 2026, 05:42:07 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 30, 2026, 05:26:11 PMYes upside. Yes he's had some injury issues but who hasn't?  Are you basing the downside on that factor? I like White and he also can serve as a returner if necessary so he has some additional skills.

I don't know if Mack's upside is more than what we've seen White do every year for 4 seasons. Mack hasn't been able to play a full season in two full seasons; so yes, the injury risk is a downside. Not to mention that he only has one productive season - we've seen many flashes in the pan who haven't been able to repeat the success of one season.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Blue In BC on January 30, 2026, 05:48:12 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 30, 2026, 05:42:07 PMI don't know if Mack's upside is more than what we've seen White do every year for 4 seasons. Mack hasn't been able to play a full season in two full seasons; so yes, the injury risk is a downside. Not to mention that he only has one productive season - we've seen many flashes in the pan who haven't been able to repeat the success of one season.

Draft profiles of each.

Tim White is a 5'9", 175-pound wide receiver and elite return specialist who
went undrafted in 2017 out of Arizona State. Known for his speed (4.51s 40-yard dash) and versatility, he has spent five stellar seasons in the CFL, earning multiple All-CFL honors and four consecutive 1,000-yard seasons before joining the Winnipeg Blue Bombers in 2026.



Austin Mack is a 6'1", 208-pound wide receiver from Ohio State who went undrafted in 2020 before carving out a career in the CFL and briefly the NFL. Known for solid size, strong run-blocking, and reliable hands, he lacks elite speed (4.59s 40-yard dash). He recently re-signed with the CFL's Edmonton Elks after a stint with the Atlanta Falcons.

Schoen only played in 19 games in 2023 and 2024 with only 3 of those in 2024. We didn't rule him out as injury prone going into 2025.

I'm not saying you're wrong but it's early to rule a player out on that IMO. I do think he has more reliable hands.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: theaardvark on January 30, 2026, 06:09:06 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 30, 2026, 05:48:12 PMDraft profiles of each.

Tim White is a 5'9", 175-pound wide receiver and elite return specialist who
went undrafted in 2017 out of Arizona State. Known for his speed (4.51s 40-yard dash) and versatility, he has spent five stellar seasons in the CFL, earning multiple All-CFL honors and four consecutive 1,000-yard seasons before joining the Winnipeg Blue Bombers in 2026.



Austin Mack is a 6'1", 208-pound wide receiver from Ohio State who went undrafted in 2020 before carving out a career in the CFL and briefly the NFL. Known for solid size, strong run-blocking, and reliable hands, he lacks elite speed (4.59s 40-yard dash). He recently re-signed with the CFL's Edmonton Elks after a stint with the Atlanta Falcons.

Schoen only played in 19 games in 2023 and 2024 with only 3 of those in 2024. We didn't rule him out as injury prone going into 2025.

I'm not saying you're wrong but it's early to rule a player out on that IMO. I do think he has more reliable hands.

Its one thing keeping a solid player (ROY) like Schoen though some injury issues, especially without dead money in the deal. Its quite another buying one at a premium price from someone that cut him.

White, I don't think it was an issue with his play that caused HAM to release him, but the fact they have a Lawler eating up the highest salary in the league on the roster.  The fact that he can do returns is a huge addition as well.  Can you imagine White/Vaval back for a punt?  With the ST shenanigans we can get up to?  Fun times.

Hervey's decision to give guaranteed money/bonus to someone who may have an injury issue that winds him up on he 6 game with a reduced $SMS benefit is questionable as well.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Blue In BC on January 30, 2026, 06:17:35 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 30, 2026, 06:09:06 PMIts one thing keeping a solid player (ROY) like Schoen though some injury issues, especially without dead money in the deal. Its quite another buying one at a premium price from someone that cut him.

White, I don't think it was an issue with his play that caused HAM to release him, but the fact they have a Lawler eating up the highest salary in the league on the roster.  The fact that he can do returns is a huge addition as well.  Can you imagine White/Vaval back for a punt?  With the ST shenanigans we can get up to?  Fun times.

Hervey's decision to give guaranteed money/bonus to someone who may have an injury issue that winds him up on he 6 game with a reduced $SMS benefit is questionable as well.

Schoen was coming out of 2024 after only playing 3 games. Many questioned the wisdom of a large contract and heavy signing bonus. At least with a nominal signing bonus, SMS is sheltered on 6 the game IR.  It was a risky decision and unfortunately didn't pay off. Sometimes that works out but it was a high risk choice.

We'll see how 2026 plays out. Nobody is safe from injuries even in TC.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Blueforlife on January 31, 2026, 04:41:37 AM
White > Mack in terms of reliability due to injury history

Both good, happy with our choice.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: blue_or_die on January 31, 2026, 03:13:04 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 29, 2026, 08:01:57 PMPretty sure that's the 2 year total deal... but hey, Hervey...

lol definitely read that as per year! My bad.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: DCM on February 01, 2026, 04:29:33 PM
Farhan Lalji
Receiver Tommy Nield has agreed to a 2-year deal with #Bombers. Gives Wpg the option to start 3 🇨🇦 receivers if needed
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Blue In BC on February 01, 2026, 04:43:09 PM
Another great addition. He has size as well and probably a good blocker.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Tecno on February 03, 2026, 07:44:52 AM
Quote from: Blueforlife on January 31, 2026, 04:41:37 AMWhite > Mack in terms of reliability due to injury history

Mack has the hands, White has the speed.  Mack is closer to Kenny/Burnham/Gino hands.  White can rip you a new one up the seam.

I'm starting to wonder where we will play all of these guys... White/Pokey at WR and Demski/Nield in the slot.  Nield in nearest slot?

Do we really want our 2 speedster home-runners out wide?

On the bright side, we're giving Condell a lot to play with here and building a solid corps.  I can't wait to see who we decide on as our 5th.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Tecno on February 03, 2026, 07:45:38 AM
Quote from: dd on January 29, 2026, 11:02:32 PMHe'11 be on the 6 game IR before Ju1y 1

Don't you mean he'11 be on the 6 game IR before July l?

;)  ;)  ;)
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Blueforlife on February 03, 2026, 03:29:16 PM
Quote from: Tecno on February 03, 2026, 07:44:52 AMMack has the hands, White has the speed.  Mack is closer to Kenny/Burnham/Gino hands.  White can rip you a new one up the seam.

I'm starting to wonder where we will play all of these guys... White/Pokey at WR and Demski/Nield in the slot.  Nield in nearest slot?

Do we really want our 2 speedster home-runners out wide?

On the bright side, we're giving Condell a lot to play with here and building a solid corps.  I can't wait to see who we decide on as our 5th.

We deep when guys go down
We will have a more balanced attack for Zach to throw dimes to
But yes too many guys this early, but a nice problem to have
Agree all missed you buddy
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Jesse on February 03, 2026, 05:21:57 PM
Quote from: Tecno on February 03, 2026, 07:44:52 AMMack has the hands, White has the speed.  Mack is closer to Kenny/Burnham/Gino hands.  White can rip you a new one up the seam.

I'm starting to wonder where we will play all of these guys... White/Pokey at WR and Demski/Nield in the slot.  Nield in nearest slot?

Do we really want our 2 speedster home-runners out wide?

On the bright side, we're giving Condell a lot to play with here and building a solid corps.  I can't wait to see who we decide on as our 5th.


Pokey in his WR spot, but Nield likely takes Clercius' spot on the other side. White and Demski are slots.

Still need another guy unless we're going with 3 Canadian receiving core. We have that massive rookie Banks (6'4", 220) we could put out wide and move Pokey into a slot position
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 03, 2026, 06:54:04 PM
Quote from: Jesse on February 03, 2026, 05:21:57 PMPokey in his WR spot, but Nield likely takes Clercius' spot on the other side. White and Demski are slots.

Still need another guy unless we're going with 3 Canadian receiving core. We have that massive rookie Banks (6'4", 220) we could put out wide and move Pokey into a slot position

Elks just signed BOLO, wouldn't have been sad if the the Bombers brought him back, he's become a solid natl. receiver and has more speed than Nield.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: blue_or_die on February 03, 2026, 06:57:37 PM
Quote from: Jesse on February 03, 2026, 05:21:57 PMPokey in his WR spot, but Nield likely takes Clercius' spot on the other side. White and Demski are slots.

Still need another guy unless we're going with 3 Canadian receiving core. We have that massive rookie Banks (6'4", 220) we could put out wide and move Pokey into a slot position

Someone said in another thread that Wilson was a slot but I always remembered him as a WR and think of him as one. I think given the talent we already have in the middle, having Pokey on the boundary side wide would be ideal and then we can get another big body in the middle to block and create some extra chaos to get the ball to the speedsters.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Tecno on February 04, 2026, 06:14:28 AM
Quote from: Jesse on February 03, 2026, 05:21:57 PMPokey in his WR spot, but Nield likely takes Clercius' spot on the other side. White and Demski are slots.

I'm not sold on this.  You don't need a super tall and beefy guy doing the rail go routes.  You need straight up speed and hands, and timing.

Why have all that Nield beef and not use it inside?  Unless you having him crossing inside every snap, for tough crosser catches or blocking.

If the 5th is Wheatie (say), doesn't it make more sense to put him out wide?  I always thought Kenny was a bit wasted out wide.  Arguably his best blue & gold game in his last season was the WDF where he caught a zillion TDs, most in the middle.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 04, 2026, 06:18:45 PM
Quote from: Tecno on February 04, 2026, 06:14:28 AMI'm not sold on this.  You don't need a super tall and beefy guy doing the rail go routes.  You need straight up speed and hands, and timing.

Why have all that Nield beef and not use it inside?  Unless you having him crossing inside every snap, for tough crosser catches or blocking.

If the 5th is Wheatie (say), doesn't it make more sense to put him out wide?  I always thought Kenny was a bit wasted out wide.  Arguably his best blue & gold game in his last season was the WDF where he caught a zillion TDs, most in the middle.


They can use Nield like Woli, they never did move him to an inside slot.
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Tecno on February 04, 2026, 10:00:38 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 04, 2026, 06:18:45 PMThey can use Nield like Woli, they never did move him to an inside slot.

Meh.  I never did understand that.  Ever since JFG (or maybe before), we park our weakest NAT out wide and throw him 2-3 balls a game (usually misses).  At least Woli got some production out of that role in his time here.

I guess because you hide your weakest link widest out and forget about him... but now we have some beef we could use inside, and we'll still park him out there?  Well, at least we can hope he'll catch more rail-gos than JFG ever did...
Title: Re: wr replacement
Post by: Jesse on February 05, 2026, 10:44:57 AM
Quote from: Tecno on February 04, 2026, 10:00:38 PMMeh.  I never did understand that.  Ever since JFG (or maybe before), we park our weakest NAT out wide and throw him 2-3 balls a game (usually misses).  At least Woli got some production out of that role in his time here.

I guess because you hide your weakest link widest out and forget about him... but now we have some beef we could use inside, and we'll still park him out there?  Well, at least we can hope he'll catch more rail-gos than JFG ever did...


Yes, you can get worse players more production if you get them closer to the QB and pepper them with more targets.

Generally offences plan to get the ball more to the better players though.