Blue Bombers add quarterback
WINNIPEG, MB., November 25, 2025 – The Winnipeg Blue Bombers today announce the team has signed American quarterback Bryce Perkins.
Perkins (6-2, 215, Virginia; born: December 20, 1996, in Chandler, AZ.) signs a futures contract with the Blue Bombers after three seasons in the NFL (2021-2022, 2025), two in the UFL (2024-2025), and a four-year collegiate career split between Arizona State (2015-2016), and Virginia (2018-2019).
Perkins signed with the Los Angeles Rams as an undrafted free agent in 2020 and was a part of the Super Bowl LVI winning squad in 2021. Perkins appeared in five games with one start, where he completed 13 passes on 23 attempts, threw one touchdown, and rushed nine times for 44 yards in a 26-10 loss to the Kansas City Chiefs. Perkins signed briefly with the Carolina Panthers in August 2025 but was released shortly after.
His 2025 UFL season with the Michigan Panthers saw him completing 109 passes for 1,342 yards and nine touchdowns, while rushing for 269 yards on 47 tries for five touchdowns in six starts. After the season, Perkins was awarded UFL MVP and UFL Offensive Player of the Year and led the league in yards-per-attempt (8.5), and passer rating (108.7).
A native of Chandler, Arizona, Perkins played college football at Arizona State and Virginia. At Virginia, he set the school record for single-season total offense with 3,603 yards and 34 touchdowns in 2018 and followed with 3,540 total yards and 33 touchdowns in 2019.
Good resume. Hard to get excited about guys who come up at this age though.
2019 College
2025 UFL
Talk about uninspiring football.
Someday, maybe the CFL can play games to empty stadiums across the USA!
UFL player of the year. Wow. We might have something here.
Well he sounds promising. One to watch in TC and pre season in 2026.
Thank the football gods. This guy, Elgersma and Zach next year please.
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on November 25, 2025, 10:23:20 PMThank the football gods. This guy, Elgersma and Zach next year please.
I'm hoping that at 5'10", Vanderbilt sensation Diego Pavia, recently added to the Bombers Neg List, will not be taken seriously in the NFL in his draft year and will be brought in here to challenge Elgersma and Perkins. Guy is a Rourke clone:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1jlE1oTqwQ
Quote from: VictorRomano on November 26, 2025, 02:49:41 PMI'm hoping that at 5'10", Vanderbilt sensation Diego Pavia, recently added to the Bombers Neg List, will not be taken seriously in the NFL in his draft year and will be brought in here to challenge Elgersma and Perkins. Guy is a Rourke clone:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1jlE1oTqwQ
Could be. He's too small for the NFL. Rourke is 6 foot 1 though.
I think Artopoeus is still in the mix.
Paul Friesen saying this guy is the "next Streveller".
Highlight videos from the spring league show his zeal for breaking tackles and keeping plays alive with his legs.
The Bombers could be looking for a short-yardage and goal-line specialist after Streveler suffered a season-ending knee injury
Terry Wilson also played in the UFL but this guy has had much more success there.
Quote from: Waffler on November 26, 2025, 04:09:14 PMPaul Friesen saying this guy is the "next Streveller".
Highlight videos from the spring league show his zeal for breaking tackles and keeping plays alive with his legs.
The Bombers could be looking for a short-yardage and goal-line specialist after Streveler suffered a season-ending knee injury
Terry Wilson also played in the UFL but this guy has had much more success there.
We don't need the next Streveler. We need the next legit # 2 QB that can progress to a # 1 QB.
Quote from: Waffler on November 26, 2025, 04:09:14 PMPaul Friesen saying this guy is the "next Streveller".
Highlight videos from the spring league show his zeal for breaking tackles and keeping plays alive with his legs.
The Bombers could be looking for a short-yardage and goal-line specialist after Streveler suffered a season-ending knee injury
Terry Wilson also played in the UFL but this guy has had much more success there.
And this is the concept that turned me around on this signing. At first I questioned the value of a 29 year old prospect. But he's not coming in to push Zach for starting reps. We cannot afford a veteran back-up and Streveler is likely out of the mix. This guy gives us as much experience as a rookie can give you. Maybe he can fill in as our short yardage guy and emergency back-up while Elgersma and others percolate a bit.
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 26, 2025, 04:11:50 PMWe don't need the next Streveler. We need the next legit # 2 QB that can progress to a # 1 QB.
I agree but see the scenario that our short yardage guy really could be the #3 QB in 2026. It's possible anyway. Zach, new guy and Perkins.
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 26, 2025, 04:11:50 PMWe don't need the next Streveler. We need the next legit # 2 QB that can progress to a # 1 QB.
We need both.
As much as people are excited about Elgersma. We shouldn't want him taking game snaps next year unless it's some development time at the end of the year.
We need a cheap bandaid while we bridge the gap.
Quote from: Jesse on November 26, 2025, 04:16:57 PMWe need both.
As much as people are excited about Elgersma. We shouldn't want him taking game snaps next year unless it's some development time at the end of the year.
We need a cheap bandaid while we bridge the gap.
Sure but the comparison to needing the next Streveler is flawed since he was only never more than a short yardage QB.
That's a role for a # 3 QB not the next hope for the next # 2 for more than a season.
Can he be that player? IDK so TC will be interesting to see if he leap frogs the other candidates.
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 26, 2025, 04:24:27 PMSure but the comparison to needing the next Streveler is flawed...
It's just Friesen's opinion, so take it FWIW: not all that much.
Perkins could be a stopgap depending on how does in TC. And if he can handle the SY/jumbo package duties at the very least, that's a win.
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 26, 2025, 04:24:27 PMSure but the comparison to needing the next Streveler is flawed since he was only never more than a short yardage QB.
That's a role for a # 3 QB not the next hope for the next # 2 for more than a season.
Can he be that player? IDK so TC will be interesting to see if he leap frogs the other candidates.
I don't really want to get bogged down in the definitions of #2 vs #3 and their responsibilities. Those change based on the team and personnel.
Streveler was all of those things last year when healthy.
A guy like Perkins is going to compete to be the back-up and if he doesn't show he's capable, he's likely cut. Whether the back-up is also the short yardage guy depends on who it is, I guess. But we haven't seen it be two separate people since Dru Brown was here.
Quote from: Jesse on November 26, 2025, 04:38:38 PMI don't really want to get bogged down in the definitions of #2 vs #3 and their responsibilities. Those change based on the team and personnel.
Streveler was all of those things last year when healthy.
A guy like Perkins is going to compete to be the back-up and if he doesn't show he's capable, he's likely cut. Whether the back-up is also the short yardage guy depends on who it is, I guess. But we haven't seen it be two separate people since Dru Brown was here.
Most teams don't use the # 2 as the short yardage guy. That's the point. The short yardage QB is a development player that starts as short yardage type IMO.
Streveler was an exception because we never had a real development player after Dru Brown. In that sense and reason he filled both roles. It's debatable whether Wilson or Arto will ever progress from a # 3 spot unless due to injury. Whether either is even on the roster in 2026 in unknown.
Anyone see anything on social media on Strev's state of mind? I assume he went under the knife and is contemplating rehab, maybe he's still in Wpg?
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 26, 2025, 04:44:05 PMMost teams don't use the # 2 as the short yardage guy. That's the point. The short yardage QB is a development player that starts as short yardage type IMO.
Streveler was an exception because we never had a real development player after Dru Brown. In that sense and reason he filled both roles. It's debatable whether Wilson or Arto will ever progress from a # 3 spot unless due to injury. Whether either is even on the roster in 2026 in unknown.
I don't know if teams are really operating this way anymore.
We certainly haven't. As far as I know the athletic QBs like Rourke and VAJ are doing their own short yardage snaps. Sask as Stevens who is SY specialist. They're not developing him. Same with Dolegala in Hamilton who was used entirely for SY. Also no a prospect at this point in his career. Montreal used a mix of Caleb Evans and Shea Patterson.
The only guy I can think of who
might fit the mold you're talking about is Dustin Crum in Ottawa. But there's not too many teams using a young prospect that they are developing as the SY guy. It seems to be a mix of starters and athletic vets.
Quote from: peg_city on November 25, 2025, 06:42:09 PMUFL player of the year. Wow. We might have something here.
Hol up.
The Bombers signed the 1997 MVP of the World League of American Football and brought him in for the 1998 season.
He started the first 10 games that year and lost them all lol.
I won't mention his name for fear of triggering PTSD in some of the older posters.
Quote from: The Fresh Prince Of Belair, MB on November 26, 2025, 05:47:45 PMHol up.
The Bombers signed the 1997 MVP of the World League of American Football and brought him in for the 1998 season.
He started the first 10 games that year and lost them all lol.
I won't mention his name for fear of triggering PTSD in some of the older posters.
I didn't know that :o
Also, looking at the Bomber roster in 1998, I completely forgot about Kevin Mason.
https://www.statscrew.com/football/stats/p-masonkev001#:~:text=Kevin%20Mason%20played%20from%201996,35%20touchdowns%20and%2041%20interceptions.
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 26, 2025, 04:11:50 PMWe don't need the next Streveler. We need the next legit # 2 QB that can progress to a # 1 QB.
We do. WPG has had a SY specialist for the entire Mafia tenure. It's part of our M.O. And teams with a specialist who is good tend to do better. See: SSK with their unstoppable freight train.
If Strev is out half/all year and/or not re-signed then bringing in a Strev clone (but younger and with a good knee) is just what the doctor ordered. Hopefully we can turn him into a legit SY super fast -- don't want failures on 3rd & 1 early in the season.
It might be a clean sweep of the QB room-not-named-Zach this season. And I would be ok with that.
P.S. No way we roll without a SY guy, and no reason anyone ever should because the 3rd dressed QB is a "free/forced dress". Why waste/risk that job on a RB, or your starting QB, or some other player? Those guys have more important things to be doing.
Quote from: Tecno on November 27, 2025, 06:19:51 AMWe do. WPG has had a SY specialist for the entire Mafia tenure. It's part of our M.O. And teams with a specialist who is good tend to do better. See: SSK with their unstoppable freight train.
If Strev is out half/all year and/or not re-signed then bringing in a Strev clone (but younger and with a good knee) is just what the doctor ordered. Hopefully we can turn him into a legit SY super fast -- don't want failures on 3rd & 1 early in the season.
It might be a clean sweep of the QB room-not-named-Zach this season. And I would be ok with that.
P.S. No way we roll without a SY guy, and no reason anyone ever should because the 3rd dressed QB is a "free/forced dress". Why waste/risk that job on a RB, or your starting QB, or some other player? Those guys have more important things to be doing.
That's not the point. The point is that we don't need our # 2 QB to be the SY player. We need to find a # 2 QB with an actual chance to become a starter in the future, not a place holder.
At the moment that would be Wilson. What we don't know is whether he will win the spot as # 2. I don't think that is the case and he may not even make the roster in 2026.
Quote from: Tecno on November 27, 2025, 06:19:51 AMWPG has had a SY specialist for the entire Mafia tenure. It's part of our M.O. And teams with a specialist who is good tend to do better. See: SSK with their unstoppable freight train.
Sadly, people called me crazy last offseason when I said we should jettison Streveller and go after Tommy Stevens as our SY guy.
Quote from: VictorRomano on November 27, 2025, 02:21:37 PMSadly, people called me crazy last offseason when I said we should jettison Streveller and go after Tommy Stevens as our SY guy.
I think many were in favour of a change but we appointed Strev as our # 2 QB before the start of TC IMO. That's where the problem began.
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 27, 2025, 03:54:38 PMI think many were in favour of a change but we appointed Strev as our # 2 QB before the start of TC IMO. That's where the problem began.
I don't know if that's entirely accurate. Streveler started week 1 vs. BC and fared well enough with Collaros serving that ridiculous 1-game suspension.
Collaros got hurt a few weeks later and Streveler struggled to find any rhythm or success in his place.
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on November 27, 2025, 04:23:41 PMI don't know if that's entirely accurate. Streveler started week 1 vs. BC and fared well enough with Collaros serving that ridiculous 1-game suspension.
Collaros got hurt a few weeks later and Streveler struggled to find any rhythm or success in his place.
Didn't Strev win all 3 of the games he started if not impress? Techno will be by shortly to verify.
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on November 27, 2025, 04:23:41 PMI don't know if that's entirely accurate. Streveler started week 1 vs. BC and fared well enough with Collaros serving that ridiculous 1-game suspension.
Collaros got hurt a few weeks later and Streveler struggled to find any rhythm or success in his place.
Well if you think Streveler is a qualified # 2 QB then we have a different view. Yes the Bombers won the game but that doesn't mean much IMO. He's not a good QB beyond being a SY freak of nature so to speak.
In that game Peterson ran for 130 yards and Lions were still trying to define their roster.
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 27, 2025, 05:46:02 PMWell if you think Streveler is a qualified # 2 QB then we have a different view. Yes the Bombers won the game but that doesn't mean much IMO. He's not a good QB beyond being a SY freak of nature so to speak.
In that game Peterson ran for 130 yards and Lions were still trying to define their roster.
I said or implied no such thing. I simply disagree with the claim that a problem started in TC relative to the QB corps here for 2025.
A win is a win and Streveler helped the team get that win in week 1. Your silly excuses for the Lions being on the losing end of that game don't change that fact.
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 27, 2025, 05:46:02 PMWell if you think Streveler is a qualified # 2 QB then we have a different view. Yes the Bombers won the game but that doesn't mean much IMO. He's not a good QB beyond being a SY freak of nature so to speak.
In that game Peterson ran for 130 yards and Lions were still trying to define their roster.
Strev was definitely viewed as a "viable" #2 going into last year despite many thinking that 2024 proved he was done. Personally I was on the fence as I wanted to believe what we saw in 2024 was bad luck of sorts and I wanted to be optimistic he could revive his 2019 magic. Hindsight proves that wrong, however, but regardless, I think that was the thought process for 2025 and unfortunately sits in an outbox pile of failures of last season.
The Strev experiment is over now, and I think we will have a prospect for the future as well as another prospect who will also be expected to excel at SY and even other "athletic" special plays - that would be Perkins presumably and hopefully Elgersma to take in the CFL and start to get good. I don't know any of this for certain but the logic makes sense.
Quote from: blue_or_die on November 27, 2025, 06:02:49 PMThe Strev experiment is over now...
Without a doubt. Consecutive knee injuries for a player who relies heavily on his mobility to be successful makes him a serious liability going forward.
Miles Brown is scum.
Wilson is a very good short yardage qb.
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on November 27, 2025, 06:01:38 PMI said or implied no such thing. I simply disagree with the claim that a problem started in TC relative to the QB corps here for 2025.
A win is a win and Streveler helped the team get that win in week 1. Your silly excuses for the Lions being on the losing end of that game don't change that fact.
It's not just that game. Streveler's time in the CFL has not been progressing. He was essentially a strong runner that threw an odd pass. He never learned to read a defence. His mechanics were horrible and once he lost his ability to run things got worse.
He beat Ottawa with 54 yards passing. Ottawa isn't / wasn't even a good team.
Does he get a gold star for that? Isn't this the context of the discussion in this string?
Bombers may not have had a better option going into TC. I did point this point before TC started that this was not good. No upside, injury history and any extended time needing to start would end badly.
If without his current injury did he show anybody on the planet that he should be back for TC this season?
Quote from: blue_or_die on November 27, 2025, 06:02:49 PMStrev was definitely viewed as a "viable" #2 going into last year despite many thinking that 2024 proved he was done. Personally I was on the fence as I wanted to believe what we saw in 2024 was bad luck of sorts and I wanted to be optimistic he could revive his 2019 magic. Hindsight proves that wrong, however, but regardless, I think that was the thought process for 2025 and unfortunately sits in an outbox pile of failures of last season.
The Strev experiment is over now, and I think we will have a prospect for the future as well as another prospect who will also be expected to excel at SY and even other "athletic" special plays - that would be Perkins presumably and hopefully Elgersma to take in the CFL and start to get good. I don't know any of this for certain but the logic makes sense.
IDK. I viewed it as the least bad option considering who was available and would come to Winnipeg at an affordable SMS.
This isn't my hindsight. I said it when he was signed before TC began. Many others felt the same way. Others were optimistic because he's a popular person and had some success earlier on a top level team surrounding him.
That's not currently the situation.
I'd like to see Strevy stick around with the organization by becoming a community ambassador like Brandon Alexander.
It would be great to still run into him on game days and have him contribute to the football community around the province.
He might decide to focus on his quarterback school full time however.
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 27, 2025, 09:23:47 PMIDK. I viewed it as the least bad option considering who was available and would come to Winnipeg at an affordable SMS.
This isn't my hindsight. I said it when he was signed before TC began. Many others felt the same way. Others were optimistic because he's a popular person and had some success earlier on a top level team surrounding him.
That's not currently the situation.
Strev turned out to be what he always was, a decent run focused #2 QB with little chance of ever rising to #1. My biggest concern is he was a placeholder blocking the path of other QB's who had a better chance of rising to #1. They've employed Terry Wilson for 2 full seasons and still don't have a clear vision of what he can become. It won't surprise me if they cut him instead of finding out.
Quote from: gobombersgo on November 27, 2025, 09:36:41 PMI'd like to see Strevy stick around with the organization by becoming a community ambassador like Brandon Alexander.
It would be great to still run into him on game days and have him contribute to the football community around the province.
He might decide to focus on his quarterback school full time however.
Isn't his girlfriend from Winnipeg? Regardless your idea has merit. He's a very likeable personality but I have no idea what his plans will be going forward. He may have some interest in coaching at some point but as what exactly and what team has space / need right now.
His interest may lie elsewhere in business and location. I'm not aware of his interest in permanently moving to Canada.
As for the post above mine I agree. That is the risk with every player that isn't the " star " per se. The team may have had high expectations for the other back ups developing more in 2025. Maybe they still do. Unless some spent a lot of time observing at practice it's an unknown issue.
Bombers aren't the only team with the same kind of issues. Every team has had recruits come and go at the QB position. It's not like starting Qb's are falling out of trees.
Wilson could get cut before TC or end up as our # 2 next year. At least in the next man up concept at the beginning. Does he have a future? I hope so but I have nothing to base it on at the moment.
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 27, 2025, 01:01:22 PMThat's not the point. The point is that we don't need our # 2 QB to be the SY player. We need to find a # 2 QB with an actual chance to become a starter in the future, not a place holder.
That's because the CFL doesn't really have 3 types of QBs, they have 4, and every team really needs all 4. That means at least one QB must fit 2 categories.
a. Franchise starter
b. Ready-now backup when #1 is injured
c. SY specialist
d. Dev guy you hope will be future #1
The confusion for us in '25 was that Strev was b&c. No one ever thought of him as d, at least not as late as '25. Wilson was d&c, but kept around mostly for d.
The reason b&d must be separated is when you bring in a raw rookie, even one with #1 potential, you don't want to be forced to play him that season. Even Dru didn't do much until year 2.
Thus a Strev-like guy who is definitely not d, but is a reliable b, is very valuable while you still develop your d guy (Wilson).
And Strev was dirt cheap. Can't discount the impact of him asking for peanuts, as KW doesn't want to tie up a lot $$ in the QB room.
Quote from: VictorRomano on November 27, 2025, 02:21:37 PMSadly, people called me crazy last offseason when I said we should jettison Streveller and go after Tommy Stevens as our SY guy.
It was crazy without having a legit .500 backup QB. Stevens has proven he can't do anything other than SY. He was legit horrible at actually being a real QB. Like worse than Marve (who was a superb SY guy). Stevens is pure SY. Period.
Wilson was still a dev and was not going to step in and win you games if Zach went down. Whereas everyone knew Strev would win us .500 (he's proven it every season he's been here).
That is why we hired Strev and not Stevens. PLUS, Stevens is making probably $50k more than Strev. We couldn't afford him.
I'm with Techno and Jesse here
Yeah Doug Flutie was lousy when he came up here. Geez we get a legitimate guy with credentials and you. Crap on him.
Is Mark Gronowski, QB listed on our neg list the one from Iowa? On the neg list it shows South Dakota. So either 2 with the same name or an error.
Iowa is playing Nebraska on TV right now.
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 28, 2025, 05:56:06 PMIs Mark Gronowski, QB listed on our neg list the one from Iowa? On the neg list it shows South Dakota. So either 2 with the same name or an error.
Iowa is playing Nebraska on TV right now.
He played for 5 years at South Dakota and got an extra year of eligibility and transferred to Iowa.
Quote from: Tecno on November 28, 2025, 01:00:24 AMeveryone knew Strev would win us .500 (he's proven it every season he's been here).
This is true but the games he was in he usually took such a pounding that he couldn't be a long term replacement. Ironic that what took him out last time was non-contact.
Quote from: Waffler on November 29, 2025, 03:25:22 PMThis is true but the games he was in he usually took such a pounding that he couldn't be a long term replacement. Ironic that what took him out last time was non-contact.
His career stats were 26 TD's versus 31 int's.
The Bombers may have won games while he was the QB but can we really say he was the reason we won? Bombers were an excellent team during his tenure. Top defence and players like Lawler and Oliveria leading the offence.
Sometimes the best thing that can be said about some QB's in some games is that they didn't lose the game. However it's also true that sometimes a QB that is not an all star makes a play that wins a game.
Draw a line where you choose on which games won were more about his play than that of the team around him.
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 29, 2025, 04:14:59 PMHis career stats were 26 TD's versus 31 int's.
The Bombers may have won games while he was the QB but can we really say he was the reason we won? Bombers were an excellent team during his tenure. Top defence and players like Lawler and Oliveria leading the offence.
Sometimes the best thing that can be said about some QB's in some games is that they didn't lose the game. However it's also true that sometimes a QB that is not an all star makes a play that wins a game.
Draw a line where you choose on which games won were more about his play than that of the team around him.
Compared to Dustin Crum, Strev. put up worse numbers in almost every category but came away with more wins because he plays with the better team.
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 29, 2025, 05:04:17 PMCompared to Dustin Crum, Strev. put up worse numbers in almost every category but came away with more wins because he plays with the better team.
I'd consider trying to sign Crum. He has some upside and at worst would be the SY QB. His SMS probably reasonable.
OTOH, I have no idea what the plan is for the 2 back up QB's from 2025 or what to expect before TC on Elgersma for example.
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 29, 2025, 05:28:20 PMI'd consider trying to sign Crum. He has some upside and at worst would be the SY QB. His SMS probably reasonable.
OTOH, I have no idea what the plan is for the 2 back up QB's from 2025 or what to expect before TC on Elgersma for example.
Yah, Crumm is the perfect backup QB, don't see him reaching starter status, like Strev he's usually geared to a run first mindset.
The absolute only reason to sign Crum is to prevent another Crumback. He seems to have the Bombers number. I'd much rather go with a completely new QB room than keep running retreads...
Gronowski is the real deal at 6'3' 230 he reminds me of a lot of Josh Allen.
Quote from: Pigskin on December 01, 2025, 07:23:00 PMGronowski is the real deal at 6'3' 230 he reminds me of a lot of Josh Allen.
I'll take your word for it. I wasn't overly impressed by him this week in the game I watched partially. In fairness that's not much for me to go on in channel surfing some of the college games.
That said, being on our neg list doesn't mean he ever ends up in Canada. So we'll see if he gets drafted this spring.
I see Elgersma got a workout by the 49 niners.
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 01, 2025, 08:31:43 PMI'll take your word for it. I wasn't overly impressed by him this week in the game I watched partially. In fairness that's not much for me to go on in channel surfing some of the college games.
That said, being on our neg list doesn't mean he ever ends up in Canada. So we'll see if he gets drafted this spring.
I see Elgersma got a workout by the 49 niners.
Darn, that may delay his arrival another 6 months.
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 02, 2025, 12:20:16 AMDarn, that may delay his arrival another 6 months.
Not unless they sign him.
We're waiting until February when "futures contracts" can be offered. That's where he'll learn if he has a training camp invite anywhere. That might delay him.
If February comes and goes and he's left standing, then we probably get him in to TC.
I wonder if the Vikings will invite Elgersma?
Or....wont cause they saw enough of him when He was with the Packers.
Looks like Ford, Maier and Powell will all be free agents. I don't think we'll have interest in any of them, but I would kick the tires on Powell. Zac won't be around much longer.
Quote from: bunker on January 30, 2026, 07:54:25 PMLooks like Ford, Maier and Powell will all be free agents. I don't think we'll have interest in any of them, but I would kick the tires on Powell. Zac won't be around much longer.
I'd be very disappointed if the Bombers signed Maier, just the thought makes me sad.
Isnt it likely Elgersma signs with UFL?. I believe one of the areas hes weak in , is the lack of 4 down experience. Then if he does anything he'll likely hang around for another round of tryouts in the nfl.
Quote from: Pete on January 30, 2026, 09:03:42 PMIsnt it likely Elgersma signs with IFL?. I believe one of the areas hes weak in , is the lack of 4 down experience. Then if he does anything he'll likely hang around for another round of tryouts in the nfl.
That seems to be his plan. I'm sure he hopes that with some 4 down experience, he'll get another try out opportunity.