Blue Bombers Forum

The Extra Point => Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum => Topic started by: gobombersgo on November 20, 2025, 07:59:20 PM

Title: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: gobombersgo on November 20, 2025, 07:59:20 PM
https://3downnation.com/2025/10/22/the-toronto-argonauts-potential-2026-free-agents-list/

https://3downnation.com/2025/10/29/the-ottawa-redblacks-potential-2026-free-agents-list/

https://3downnation.com/2025/10/30/the-edmonton-elks-potential-2026-free-agents-list/

https://3downnation.com/2025/11/03/the-calgary-stampeders-potential-2026-free-agents-list/

https://3downnation.com/2025/11/10/the-hamilton-tiger-cats-potential-2026-free-agents-list/

https://3downnation.com/2025/11/11/the-b-c-lions-potential-2026-free-agents-list/

https://3downnation.com/2025/11/18/the-montreal-alouettes-potential-2026-free-agents-list/

https://3downnation.com/2025/11/20/the-saskatchewan-roughriders-potential-2026-free-agent-list/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: gobombersgo on November 20, 2025, 08:02:48 PM
The Edmonton Elks have extended a pair of budding defensive stars in American defensive back Kordell Jackson and Canadian defensive lineman Noah Curtis.

Jackson
was the Elks' nominee for Most Outstanding Defensive Player in 2025, racking up 78 defensive tackles, two sacks, an interception, and 11 passes defended. The Birmingham, Al., native will now be tied to the organization through 2027 as part of a two-year extension.

Curtis will remain in Edmonton through 2026 after missing the entire 2025 season with a torn ACL.

A fourth-round pick in the 2023 CFL Draft, Curtis has suited up in 35 games, recording 44 defensive tackles and eight sacks. The six-foot-five, 302-pound pass rusher has made starts at both defensive end and defensive tackle, making him a uniquely valuable prospect.

https://3downnation.com/2025/11/19/edmonton-elks-extend-budding-defensive-stars-kordell-jackson-noah-curtis/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: gobombersgo on November 20, 2025, 08:04:00 PM
The Toronto Argonauts have re-signed Canadian linebackers Ryder Varga and Jordan Herdman-Reed.

The six-foot-three, 225-pound Varga came to Toronto via trade with B.C. in January and went on to play 13 games with 10 special teams tackles in 2025.

The six-foot, 235-pound Herdman-Reed signed with Toronto in July and played seven games while registering five special teams tackles. The seven-year CFL veteran played 13 games for Saskatchewan in 2024, making eight special teams tackles.

https://3downnation.com/2025/11/19/toronto-argos-re-sign-canadian-linebackers-ryder-varga-jordan-herdman-reed/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: gobombersgo on November 20, 2025, 08:05:26 PM
The Edmonton Elks have extended a pair of impact defensive linemen, Canadian defensive end Robbie Smith and American defensive tackle Jordan Williams.

Smith's new deal will keep him with the team through 2027, while Williams, who was a pending free agent, is now under contract for 2026.

https://3downnation.com/2025/11/20/edmonton-elks-extend-defensive-linemen-robbie-smith-jordan-williams/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: VictorRomano on November 20, 2025, 08:06:13 PM
Man, if we could get Hardrick back from Sask, along with maybe Robustelli and SYQB Tommy Stevens, I'd be real happy with that.  I said last year we should have gone with Stevens over Strevvy in FA.  Add Dequoy or Katsantonis at Safety and I'd be really, really happy.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: gobombersgo on November 20, 2025, 08:06:39 PM
The Montreal Alouettes have locked up kicker Jose Maltos Diaz with a two-year contract extension, which will keep him with the team through 2027.

The native of Monterrey, Mexico, suited up for 18 regular-season games, both playoff games, and the Grey Cup this season. He broke the single-season franchise field-goal record previously held by David Duval by putting 58 kicks through the uprights, while leading the CFL in points (210) and finishing third in field-goal percentage (89.2 percent).

https://3downnation.com/2025/11/20/montreal-alouettes-ink-global-kicker-jose-maltos-diaz-to-two-year-extension/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: gobombersgo on November 20, 2025, 08:09:04 PM
Robbie Smith remains one of CFL's highest-paid players on extension with Edmonton Elks

Canadian defensive lineman Robbie Smith will remain one of the CFL's highest-paid players on his extension with the Edmonton Elks, per sources, despite coming off a down year.

The 28-year-old played only 10 regular-season games due to injury in 2025, recording 16 defensive tackles. Based on what they're paying him over the next two seasons, it appears the Elks still have full confidence in Smith.

The product of Wilfrid Laurier University received a $50,000 signing bonus to extend with the team through 2027.

Including this bonus, the new contract is worth $235,000 in hard money for 2026, including $135,000 in salary, $25,000 in non-football-related services to the team, and $15,000 in housing. He can also earn an addition $13,500 in possible incentives, including $2,500 if he records eight sacks and another $2,500 if he reaches 10 sacks.

In 2027, Smith is set to earn $240,000 in hard money with a salary increase to $145,000 and an offseason roster bonus worth $45,000. He also has the same $13,500 in possible incentives available. If he reaches all of his incentives over the next two years, Smith will earn $502,000 from the Elks.

https://3downnation.com/2025/11/20/robbie-smith-remains-one-of-cfls-highest-paid-players-on-extension-with-edmonton-elks/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: ModAdmin on November 20, 2025, 08:54:45 PM
Lions extend five, including National LB Chase Tataryn

VANCOUVER — The BC Lions announced on Thursday they have extended five players: Global kicker Ross Bolger, National offensive lineman Alex Berwick, National long snapper Cam Foran, National offensive lineman Connor Klassen and National linebacker Chase Tataryn.

Bolger (five-foot-11, 207 pounds) was selected fourth overall in last spring's Global Draft. The native of Laois, Ireland spent all of this past season on the practice squad. The former Gaelic Football player moved to North America in 2023 to play at Idaho State for 33 games across two seasons.

As a senior, Bolger finished 13th in the nation in net punting and was named Big Sky Special Teams Player of the Week three times. He earned an invitation to the NFL International Pathway program early in 2025.

Berwick
(six-foot-two, 306 pounds) was selected in round seven (59th overall) of the 2025 CFL Draft. After emerging from training camp with a spot on the practice roster, the Ottawa native dressed in six regular season games as a reserve offensive lineman.

Alex played his entire University career at Western, suiting up in 41 games from 2021-24. Along with helping the Mustangs win a Vanier Cup and Mitchell Bowl in 2021, he earned OUA First-Team All-Star and U Sports Second-Team All-Canadian in his final year.

Foran (six-foot, 212 pounds) originally signed with the Lions ahead of 2025 training camp and made his CFL debut on September 27 in a special teams role.

Cam suited up at Acadia from 2021-24, recording 7.5 tackles. He took over as the team's full-time long snapper in 2023.

Klassen(six-foot-four, 310 pounds) is a Big River, Saskatchewan product and was taken in round four (37th overall) of last year's CFL Draft, Klassen was released by the team after suffering an injury in training camp.

Following three junior seasons with the Regina Thunder (2019, 2021-22) that saw two Prairie Conference All-Star selections, Klassen moved to U Sports and the Regina Rams from 2023-24 and served as the squad's starting right tackle for 19 games.

Tataryn (five-foot-11, 212 lbs) is a native of Saskatoon, and was taken in round six (50th overall) of last year's CFL Draft after suiting up in 28 games with the Alberta Golden Bears from 2021 to 2024, registering 139 total tackles (91 solo, 48 assisted), 11 tackles for a loss, six sacks, two pass breakups, one forced fumble and a fumble recovery.

Following 2025 training camp in Kamloops, he was released to pursue his final year of U Sports eligibility. In eight games with the Golden Bears this season, Tataryn had 55 total tackles (39 solo, 16 assisted), a pair of pass breakups, one sack, one interception and a fumble recovery in eight contests.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on November 20, 2025, 10:26:18 PM
Saskatchewan's entire recieving corps will become Free agents , they can't re-sign them all, potential good reciever may shake out of there (again).

Wonder if Taylor Powell is going to be happy being #2 in Hamilton again, could come here and get a foot in the door and potentially become a starter 2 years from now. Guess it depends on BLM retirement plans.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on November 21, 2025, 06:08:48 AM
Quote from: dd on November 20, 2025, 10:26:18 PMSaskatchewan's entire recieving corps will become Free agents , they can't re-sign them all, potential good reciever may shake out of there (again).

Pass on all of them.  None of them are a Dressler.  SSK will keep K.Johnson as the priority (best hands).  I don't think the rest matter, other than SSK needing a lot of NATs.  SSK has built a scheme that nearly any goofball can succeed in, especially if he's bigger/heavier for the blocking.  I would expect the ELCs stay and the rest walk if they get offers.

Quote from: dd on November 20, 2025, 10:26:18 PMWonder if Taylor Powell is going to be happy being #2 in Hamilton again, could come here and get a foot in the door and potentially become a starter 2 years from now. Guess it depends on BLM retirement plans.

I'd be all over Powell.  I would spell out exactly what you said to him -- come and dev under Zach and you're our man in 1-3 seasons.  He'd have to accept Strev-like money though.  No $$ for anything better.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 21, 2025, 01:37:45 PM
Quote from: Tecno on November 21, 2025, 06:08:48 AMPass on all of them.  None of them are a Dressler.  SSK will keep K.Johnson as the priority (best hands).  I don't think the rest matter, other than SSK needing a lot of NATs.  SSK has built a scheme that nearly any goofball can succeed in, especially if he's bigger/heavier for the blocking.  I would expect the ELCs stay and the rest walk if they get offers.


You keep dissing the Riders receiving group without acknowledging they're doing it with 4 Natls, which is pretty impressive, not sure that's ever been done in modern times.  Imagine if they still had McInnis? They've built that group entirely through the draft and recruitment over a long time, Bombers #3 Sterns ended up here because he could not make the roster there, looks like Banes who beat him out will be looking for a new home soon as well.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Balticfox on November 21, 2025, 04:03:21 PM
Quote from: Tecno on November 21, 2025, 06:08:48 AMPass on all of them.  None of them are a Dressler.  SSK will keep K.Johnson as the priority (best hands).  I don't think the rest matter, other than SSK needing a lot of NATs.  SSK has built a scheme that nearly any goofball can succeed in, especially if he's bigger/heavier for the blocking.  I would expect the ELCs stay and the rest walk if they get offers.

Sam Emilus was the Roughriders' most productive/consistent receiver when he got back from injury.

 :-\

Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on November 21, 2025, 05:02:31 PM
Riders draft picks win U-Sports top O-Lineman and top defensive player awards.

https://3downnation.com/2025/11/20/western-ol-riders-draft-pick-erik-andersen-wins-j-p-metras-trophy-as-top-u-sports-lineman/

https://3downnation.com/2025/11/20/saskatchewan-linebacker-riders-draft-pick-seth-hundeby-wins-presidents-trophy-as-top-u-sports-defender/

Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on November 21, 2025, 05:38:12 PM
Quote from: Tecno on November 21, 2025, 06:08:48 AMPass on all of them.  None of them are a Dressler.  SSK will keep K.Johnson as the priority (best hands).  I don't think the rest matter, other than SSK needing a lot of NATs.  SSK has built a scheme that nearly any goofball can succeed in, especially if he's bigger/heavier for the blocking.  I would expect the ELCs stay and the rest walk if they get offers.

I'd be all over Powell.  I would spell out exactly what you said to him -- come and dev under Zach and you're our man in 1-3 seasons.  He'd have to accept Strev-like money though.  No $$ for anything better.

You can't let your Rider hatred cloud your talent judgement.

I'd be giddy with glee if we could find a Sam Emilus deep threat and a KSB, those are 2 QUALITY NATS that any team would want, thing is, the Riders aren't going to let them walk. Meyers is a very productive reciever for them as well, as was Robustelli, who may shake free after the FA $$ are used to sign Emilus and KSB, and I would GLADLY welcome either to our lineup. Both Meyers and Robustelli are game changers and would be an upgrade compared to our current lot.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: gobombersgo on November 21, 2025, 08:37:57 PM
DL Ralph Holley re-signs with Toronto Argonauts following NFL stint

American defensive tackle Ralph Holley is returning to the Toronto Argonauts following a stint in the NFL.

Holley signed with the Cleveland Browns this offseason but was waived as part of final roster cuts after training camp. He was twice brought back on the practice squad before being released both times.

The six-foot-one, 285-pound defender was a standout with the Toronto Argonauts in 2024, his first year in the CFL, recording 22 tackles, eight sacks and one forced fumble. His eight sacks tied for the league lead.

https://3downnation.com/2025/11/21/dl-ralph-holley-re-signs-with-toronto-argonauts-following-nfl-stint/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on November 22, 2025, 01:33:55 AM
Quote from: dd on November 21, 2025, 05:38:12 PMI'd be giddy with glee if we could find a Sam Emilus deep threat and a KSB, those are 2 QUALITY NATS that any team would want, thing is, the Riders aren't going to let them walk. Meyers is a very productive reciever for them as well, as was Robustelli, who may shake free after the FA $$ are used to sign Emilus and KSB, and I would GLADLY welcome either to our lineup. Both Meyers and Robustelli are game changers and would be an upgrade compared to our current lot.

My point is the success is mostly scheme, not REC.  Any non-crap REC can work in their scheme.  It's making mediocre dime a dozen guys (and NATs!) look better than they are.  Watch some leave in FA and suck in their new teams.

KSB has been hot garbage since returning from injury.  Meyers/Robustelli are just normal dime & dozen new IMP scouting prospects.  Literally nothing special nor any reason to $$pay$$ them.  Give me Herslow any day of the week over anything ELC SSK has.

Emilus is ok, and very good "for a NAT".  Great similarities to Demski, yes.  But not worth whatever his $$ ask will be.

K.Johnson is the real talent: great hands, smart, good routes, short and deep threat, and can take abuse in the middle.  He's the only IMP there that will be an all-star going forward.

I'm not ignoring my bias.  Instead I am very aware of how the league-top OL, short-mostly scheme, and accurate QB create the illusion of "wow, great RECs!".  Part of the proof will be when they fail to get a huge payday in FA (minus the 2 good ones and maybe KSB riding the coattails of his 2-years-ago performance).
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on November 22, 2025, 03:51:19 AM
Quote from: Tecno on November 22, 2025, 01:33:55 AMMy point is the success is mostly scheme, not REC.  Any non-crap REC can work in their scheme.  It's making mediocre dime a dozen guys (and NATs!) look better than they are.  Watch some leave in FA and suck in their new teams.

KSB has been hot garbage since returning from injury.  Meyers/Robustelli are just normal dime & dozen new IMP scouting prospects.  Literally nothing special nor any reason to $$pay$$ them.  Give me Herslow any day of the week over anything ELC SSK has.

Emilus is ok, and very good "for a NAT".  Great similarities to Demski, yes.  But not worth whatever his $$ ask will be.

K.Johnson is the real talent: great hands, smart, good routes, short and deep threat, and can take abuse in the middle.  He's the only IMP there that will be an all-star going forward.

I'm not ignoring my bias.  Instead I am very aware of how the league-top OL, short-mostly scheme, and accurate QB create the illusion of "wow, great RECs!".  Part of the proof will be when they fail to get a huge payday in FA (minus the 2 good ones and maybe KSB riding the coattails of his 2-years-ago performance).

If your theory is true, then the moral of the story is--don't cheap out on an OC, get a good one, as he can devise a scheme to make your schmoe recievers look like world beaters. And we all know our scheme HAS TO change.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on November 22, 2025, 06:28:19 AM
Quote from: dd on November 22, 2025, 03:51:19 AMIf your theory is true, then the moral of the story is--don't cheap out on an OC, get a good one, as he can devise a scheme to make your schmoe recievers look like world beaters. And we all know our scheme HAS TO change.

I somewhat agree.  However, my hunch is the whole scheme was a Mace/ODay/Mueller trio-combo baby.  Why?  Mueller has been there for years and never had this much success.

I guess it could also be Mace/ODay decided to tailor the FA/DP precisely to what Mueller was already doing.  Might be impossible to ever know.  Whatever it is, it's working.

The problem with trying this with Hogan is what is Hogan trying to do?  Who knows.  We had no identity in '25.  So even if KW/MOS want to scheme around Hogan, no one knows what that scheme would be!  If no one can figure that out, then just stack the OL and let Zach figure it all out on the field!
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on November 24, 2025, 12:23:09 PM
Keon Hatcher expects big raise, can BC afford him??

https://3downnation.com/2025/11/23/my-turn-b-c-lions-pending-free-agent-keon-hatcher-wants-contract-befitting-cfl-receiving-leader/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on November 24, 2025, 03:13:12 PM
I don't know if the Lions have the cap room to sign Hatcher, man would it be nice to get that guy in our lineup!!
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on November 24, 2025, 04:19:33 PM
Quote from: dd on November 24, 2025, 03:13:12 PMI don't know if the Lions have the cap room to sign Hatcher, man would it be nice to get that guy in our lineup!!

Who knows how much of the 2025 SMS increase any team used. Even without that, the increase in SMS in 2025 will be also available in 2026. In that sense teams have " more " money to spend. Where they choose to spend it is all TBD.

We've discussed the possible increase validity for Oliveria for example. In theory we have more to give him but is that the best use of a higher SMS?

Bombers have about 30 potential free agents. Many will want and expect a raise. It's going to be interesting to watch how this unfolds.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Pete on November 24, 2025, 04:54:13 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on November 24, 2025, 12:23:09 PMKeon Hatcher expects big raise, can BC afford him??

https://3downnation.com/2025/11/23/my-turn-b-c-lions-pending-free-agent-keon-hatcher-wants-contract-befitting-cfl-receiving-leader/
Im betting they find a way maybe by playing the marketing money game again. If they dont Calgary with Adams should go after him.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on November 24, 2025, 05:06:10 PM
Quote from: Pete on November 24, 2025, 04:54:13 PMIm betting they find a way maybe by playing the marketing money game again. If they dont Calgary with Adams should go after him.

Hard to say. Money issue aside a receiver is going to want to play in BC with a top QB that likes to go deep in  passing focused offense. Half a season indoors is not a bad attraction for a player either.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 24, 2025, 05:35:11 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on November 24, 2025, 12:23:09 PMKeon Hatcher expects big raise, can BC afford him??

https://3downnation.com/2025/11/23/my-turn-b-c-lions-pending-free-agent-keon-hatcher-wants-contract-befitting-cfl-receiving-leader/

Except for Lawler at $300k the GM's have constrained elite receivers to around $225k, Hatcher made $168k last season, McInnis $250k, Cottoy $166k, they'll pay to keep Hatcher but other pieces will likely be lost.  Unfortunate for BC they're already paying the increased asking rate of a good team without the reward of a Grey Cup victory.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 24, 2025, 05:38:40 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 24, 2025, 04:19:33 PMWho knows how much of the 2025 SMS increase any team used. Even without that, the increase in SMS in 2025 will be also available in 2026. In that sense teams have " more " money to spend. Where they choose to spend it is all TBD.


Pretty clear every team spent to the max and some likely went over, no carry over so no sense hanging onto it for next year. Walters said himself, SMS bump went to pay healthy players camping on the 1 game in Wpg. and elsewhere.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on November 24, 2025, 05:48:42 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 24, 2025, 05:38:40 PMPretty clear every team spent to the max and some likely went over, no carry over so no sense hanging onto it for next year. Walters said himself, SMS bump went to pay healthy players camping on the 1 game in Wpg. and elsewhere.

There is always some carry over. Not every team had a dozen players on the 1 game IR most of the year. Even we didn't do that for quite awhile.

As we've already seen, some teams are re-signing some of their potential free agents. Some of them will be getting early money from the 2025 SMS.

We'll find out eventually how many teams exceeded the SMS and by how much.

Regardless it doesn't change the fact that the 2026 SMS will be used in more of the normal way. That said, it doesn't automatically mean a player that earned $200K in 2025 now gets $250K.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 24, 2025, 06:06:18 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 24, 2025, 05:48:42 PMThere is always some carry over. Not every team had a dozen players on the 1 game IR most of the year. Even we didn't do that for quite awhile.

As we've already seen, some teams are re-signing some of their potential free agents. Some of them will be getting early money from the 2025 SMS.

We'll find out eventually how many teams exceeded the SMS and by how much.

Regardless it doesn't change the fact that the 2026 SMS will be used in more of the normal way. That said, it doesn't automatically mean a player that earned $200K in 2025 now gets $250K.

There is no SMS carry over to 2026, whatever has not been spent will be spent by year end.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Stats Junkie on November 24, 2025, 06:58:26 PM
Ticats have re-signed LS Gordon Whyte. I think he is the best at his craft.

https://www.ticats.ca/2025/11/24/tiger-cats-re-sign-veteran-ls-gordon-whyte-add-db-kendall-bohler/ (https://www.ticats.ca/2025/11/24/tiger-cats-re-sign-veteran-ls-gordon-whyte-add-db-kendall-bohler/)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Stats Junkie on November 24, 2025, 07:00:07 PM
Dates have been set for Touchdown Kelowna.

June 27 vs. Calgary
July 4 vs. Edmonton

https://www.bclions.com/2025/11/24/touchdown-kelowna-welcomes-stampeders-elks-to-okanagan-in-2026/ (https://www.bclions.com/2025/11/24/touchdown-kelowna-welcomes-stampeders-elks-to-okanagan-in-2026/)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on November 24, 2025, 07:26:43 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 24, 2025, 06:06:18 PMThere is no SMS carry over to 2026, whatever has not been spent will be spent by year end.

That's not what I said or meant. There is almost always some SMS left that is spent to re-sign players before the end of the year. That potentially creates an advantage in the 2026 season SMS since some bonus or advance money is taken from the previous SMS.

Bryant signed an extension  Dec 2 2024. Castillo singed one Nov 21 2024 as examples.

We're seeing some players being extended after the Grey Cup.  Teams using some 2025 SMS left.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 24, 2025, 08:41:05 PM
Harvard Media expands national footprint by acquiring 3DownNation.

I believe they are the radio outfit that owns the Riders broadcast rights.


https://3downnation.com/2025/11/24/harvard-media-expands-national-footprint-by-acquiring-3downnation/ (https://3downnation.com/2025/11/24/harvard-media-expands-national-footprint-by-acquiring-3downnation/)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on November 25, 2025, 08:29:40 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 24, 2025, 08:41:05 PMHarvard Media expands national footprint by acquiring 3DownNation.

Wow!  Fringe outfit in some dude's basement just made bank then.  That'll keep the founders in gravy for quite a while.

Now... expect 3down to start having a huge green bias, assuming your guess about this group is correct.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on November 25, 2025, 08:32:28 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 24, 2025, 05:38:40 PMPretty clear every team spent to the max and some likely went over, no carry over so no sense hanging onto it for next year. Walters said himself

I think it's a KW bluff.  I seriously doubt we spent to the +$400k cap -- even with the extra 1GIR usage.  And if we did then it's almost criminal that we overspent on mediocre players.

My bet is KW was $200k away from original cap, then spent ~$200k on 1GIR, and thus has the whole +$400k left to dole out to pre-2026 re-signings.  Assuming he now believes that the $400k is FOR REALZ.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on November 25, 2025, 08:36:40 AM
Quote from: Ridermania on November 24, 2025, 12:23:09 PMKeon Hatcher expects big raise, can BC afford him??

He deserves it.  If I was forced to pick right now between Kenny and Keon at the same price... I might go with Keon.  Keon is more versatile and can take more punishment.  Kenny has slightly better hands and more circus.  But as we saw, circus won't always win you games.

I don't see how BC can afford McInnis AND Keon though.  McInnis didn't earn his huge $ this season.  Trade him away and sign Keon.  Some team in ratio heck will do it.

My new philosophy for WFC is no overpriced RECs -- so I don't want him.  Spend all the $ on OL -- that's the key to winning.  BC OL almost lost the WSF because of porous OL, then they lost the WDF partially because of it.  Having 2 superstar RECs didn't help Rourke much when he didn't have time to throw.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 25, 2025, 06:08:56 PM
Quote from: Tecno on November 25, 2025, 08:36:40 AMHe deserves it.  If I was forced to pick right now between Kenny and Keon at the same price... I might go with Keon.  Keon is more versatile and can take more punishment.  Kenny has slightly better hands and more circus.  But as we saw, circus won't always win you games.

I don't see how BC can afford McInnis AND Keon though.  McInnis didn't earn his huge $ this season.  Trade him away and sign Keon.  Some team in ratio heck will do it.

My new philosophy for WFC is no overpriced RECs -- so I don't want him.  Spend all the $ on OL -- that's the key to winning.  BC OL almost lost the WSF because of porous OL, then they lost the WDF partially because of it.  Having 2 superstar RECs didn't help Rourke much when he didn't have time to throw.

Justin McInnis was 3rd in receiving yds league wide. if BC wants to get rid of him, he'd be my #1 target in FA.  At times he can look clumsy and slow but he puts up the numbers year after year.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 25, 2025, 06:18:45 PM
Quote from: Tecno on November 25, 2025, 08:32:28 AMI think it's a KW bluff.  I seriously doubt we spent to the +$400k cap -- even with the extra 1GIR usage.  And if we did then it's almost criminal that we overspent on mediocre players.

My bet is KW was $200k away from original cap, then spent ~$200k on 1GIR, and thus has the whole +$400k left to dole out to pre-2026 re-signings.  Assuming he now believes that the $400k is FOR REALZ.

If that's the case he should be announcing a number of re-signings shortly, but so far nuthin.  Maybe with their contracts up in the air O'Shea and Walters didn't have the chance to sit down with Wade and fully re-evaluate the roster, but they should be wrapping that up shortly.

Never known Walters to bluff or make up stories, he comes across as very open and truthful, the opposite of O'Shea!
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on November 25, 2025, 10:36:00 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 25, 2025, 06:08:56 PMJustin McInnis was 3rd in receiving yds league wide. if BC wants to get rid of him, he'd be my #1 target in FA.  At times he can look clumsy and slow but he puts up the numbers year after year.
Ya, he isn't going anywhere. He's the #1 NAT reciever a couple of seasons running, and to think Sask let him get away, and Sask has Emilus and KSB as their other NAT recievers, why the heck can't we draft like that!!!
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: DM83 on November 26, 2025, 06:22:21 AM
Romano, you should be a scout for the Bombers. Those are guys that should be signed immediately, f the fine.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on November 26, 2025, 07:39:06 AM
Quote from: dd on November 25, 2025, 10:36:00 PMYa, he isn't going anywhere. He's the #1 NAT reciever a couple of seasons running, and to think Sask let him get away, and Sask has Emilus and KSB as their other NAT recievers, why the heck can't we draft like that!!!

Because we have been (near-)last in the draft picks every season since '20?  SSK got to pick higher than us all of those seasons.  Finally, in '26, that situation will be reversed.  I hope we do better with our 1RDP than "just another NAT LBer" that we always seem to draft 852 of.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on November 26, 2025, 07:42:55 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 25, 2025, 06:18:45 PMIf that's the case he should be announcing a number of re-signings shortly, but so far nuthin.  Maybe with their contracts up in the air O'Shea and Walters didn't have the chance to sit down with Wade and fully re-evaluate the roster, but they should be wrapping that up shortly.

I think we will get a lot of re-signings before Dec 31, and lots of bonus money moved forward to 2025.

If the Hogan-gone rumors have any merit, there could be a situation of a player or cadre of players forcing him out -- refusing to re-sign until a "real" OC is secured.  If Brady really does have a bee in his bonnet, and that bee is named Hogan, then I could see "I want to be in a place I can win cups" Brady saying "no signo until he gonzo".

Yes, this is wild fantasy, but it could be what's going on.  Need to find out more about the real situation with Hogan.  Everyone's pressers around the ESF hinted that Hogan was 100% staying.  But Brady was giving off mixed signals.

And another question: if Brady says "fire Hogan or I'm leaving", does Mafia bow to that kind of blackmail?  Now, change "Brady" to "Brady, Stan, Neuf"... would we bow to that?

It's the off-season... rumors and speculation galore!  Weeeeeee!

At this point I'd almost welcome a "Hogan is staying as OC" statement.  It would at least tell everyone where we stand and allow players to make their choices and us start re-signing our keepers.  Or, similarly, come out and say "Condell is our OC".  Just say something!
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 30, 2025, 03:44:23 AM
Interesting read, provides some background to the $400k SMS bump that arrived just before TC. It sounds like a lack of harmony exists between the CFL and the CFLPA currently.

https://3downnation.com/2025/11/29/cflpa-to-weigh-2027-opt-out-clause-in-cfl-cba-based-on-tsn-contract/ (https://3downnation.com/2025/11/29/cflpa-to-weigh-2027-opt-out-clause-in-cfl-cba-based-on-tsn-contract/)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on November 30, 2025, 08:28:57 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 30, 2025, 03:44:23 AMInteresting read, provides some background to the $400k SMS bump that arrived just before TC. It sounds like a lack of harmony exists between the CFL and the CFLPA currently.

There was ever harmony between CFL & the PA?   8)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on November 30, 2025, 01:32:02 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 30, 2025, 03:44:23 AMInteresting read, provides some background to the $400k SMS bump that arrived just before TC. It sounds like a lack of harmony exists between the CFL and the CFLPA currently.

https://3downnation.com/2025/11/29/cflpa-to-weigh-2027-opt-out-clause-in-cfl-cba-based-on-tsn-contract/ (https://3downnation.com/2025/11/29/cflpa-to-weigh-2027-opt-out-clause-in-cfl-cba-based-on-tsn-contract/)

Yeah, not announcing the increase early or having a plan on how to use " revenue sharing " negotiated was a mess from day 1.

Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: markf on November 30, 2025, 02:47:02 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 30, 2025, 01:32:02 PMYeah, not announcing the increase early or having a plan on how to use " revenue sharing " negotiated was a mess from day 1.



" The Canadian Football League Players' Association (CFLPA) is confident that the league will not enact any future rule changes without their prior consultation.

"We were informed about these changes but not consulted," said CFLPA president Solomon Elimimian in Winnipeg. "That won't happen again. "

New commissioner, not off to a great start.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 30, 2025, 07:00:07 PM
Quote from: markf on November 30, 2025, 02:47:02 PM" The Canadian Football League Players' Association (CFLPA) is confident that the league will not enact any future rule changes without their prior consultation.

"We were informed about these changes but not consulted," said CFLPA president Solomon Elimimian in Winnipeg. "That won't happen again. "

New commissioner, not off to a great start.

I've been less than impressed with Solomon Elimimian since he took over as president of the CFLPA in 2020, time to give the job back to a hard working Canadian boy. I nominate Jake Thomas!
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: markf on November 30, 2025, 07:27:48 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 30, 2025, 07:00:07 PMI've been less than impressed with Solomon Elimimian since he took over as president of the CFLPA in 2020, time to give the job back to a hard working Canadian boy. I nominate Jake Thomas!

😂
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 01, 2025, 02:24:50 AM
Quote from: markf on November 30, 2025, 02:47:02 PM"We were informed about these changes but not consulted," said CFLPA president Solomon Elimimian in Winnipeg. "That won't happen again. "

Until it does!  There was no recourse then, there will be none next time.  Nothing was stopping Johnston then, nothing will stop him next time.  Johnston doesn't give a rats butt about the players, and I don't even think the league.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: VictorRomano on December 01, 2025, 01:51:03 PM
Quote from: Tecno on December 01, 2025, 02:24:50 AMohnston doesn't give a rats butt about the players, and I don't even think the league.


I said it before, and I'll say it again:

I believe that MLSE is intentionally trying to torpedo the Argos, and also the CFL, so they can get an NFL franchise, which MLSE believes will draw all Canadians together to support what they will advertise and promote as "Canada's Team" - just like they did with the Blue Jays and Raptors and Leafs.  The CFL, and the Argos, are an impediment to that goal, and therefore the faster the Argos and CFL are removed, the faster MLSE gets an NFL franchise.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 01, 2025, 03:06:48 PM
Quote from: VictorRomano on December 01, 2025, 01:51:03 PMI said it before, and I'll say it again:

I believe that MLSE is intentionally trying to torpedo the Argos, and also the CFL, so they can get an NFL franchise, which MLSE believes will draw all Canadians together to support what they will advertise and promote as "Canada's Team" - just like they did with the Blue Jays and Raptors and Leafs.  The CFL, and the Argos, are an impediment to that goal, and therefore the faster the Argos and CFL are removed, the faster MLSE gets an NFL franchise.

I don't know why some people think that Toronto will ever be on the radar of the NFL. Franchise fee and cost of appropriate stadium are already major cost issues. That will be true whether the CFL exists or doesn't.

The latest estimate of the franchise fee is $2.0 Billion USD. The newest stadium in Las Vegas cost $1.9 Billion USD.

Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: markf on December 01, 2025, 03:27:03 PM
Quote from: Tecno on December 01, 2025, 02:24:50 AMUntil it does!  There was no recourse then, there will be none next time.  Nothing was stopping Johnston then, nothing will stop him next time.  Johnston doesn't give a rats butt about the players, and I don't even think the league.


My guess... Just another paragraph on his resume.

Re NFL in Toronto... no doubt there are people, that would love to do that.

And I can see  Rob Ford paying for a good part of a stadium. With lots of hullabaloo and media support. And online yelling and shouting in favour of it.

I think NFLwould rather go to Mexico City at this point.

Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Waffler on December 01, 2025, 03:38:43 PM
Quote from: VictorRomano on December 01, 2025, 01:51:03 PMI believe that MLSE is intentionally trying to torpedo the Argos, and also the CFL
I would believe this more if I could think of a single reason the CFL's board of governors would want to fold the league. All I can believe is that Johnston sold them on his TSN connections and his ability to get more tv money and they were willing to agree with anything to get it. I still think it's downhill from here, how much damage gets done remains to be seen.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on December 01, 2025, 04:05:18 PM
Quote from: VictorRomano on December 01, 2025, 01:51:03 PMI said it before, and I'll say it again:

I believe that MLSE is intentionally trying to torpedo the Argos, and also the CFL, so they can get an NFL franchise, which MLSE believes will draw all Canadians together to support what they will advertise and promote as "Canada's Team" - just like they did with the Blue Jays and Raptors and Leafs.  The CFL, and the Argos, are an impediment to that goal, and therefore the faster the Argos and CFL are removed, the faster MLSE gets an NFL franchise.


...Is there a rule somewhere that forbids them from owning more than one football team? They own more than one hockey team.

If they could get an NFL team they would do so. It would require a new facility to be built. That would only be good for the CFL because the Argos could play there at the cost of an NFL budget rounding error.

This theory is BS. In fact, they have financially supported the Argos every since acquiring them and all signs suggests they simply want them to be profitable. If they were anti CFL they would have simply dumped the team years ago. Instead, they write cheques.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: gobombersgo on December 01, 2025, 05:01:19 PM
Not only would Toronto need a stadium but the NFL also doesnt allow corporations to own franchises.

I cant see Toronto getting an NFL franchise within the next 15-20 years.

Alot needs to happen in the meantime. The Argos playing in Toronto is a minor concern compared to the other issues.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: theaardvark on December 01, 2025, 05:35:17 PM
With the current adversarial climate, can you see a Canadian NFL franchise?  Would NFL fans protest when a Canadian team visited?  Would Canadian fans boo visiting teams / anthems?

Not saying this is a deal breaker for MLSE, but still, for the NFL, do they want/need the hassel, especially when there are plenty of US spots they can go?  Or how about Dubai or Riyadh?  London?  Berlin?  Moscow? Soeul? Tokyo?

And the problem with giving Toronto a team is then Buffalo would want one.

Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on December 01, 2025, 11:52:42 PM
Mike Miller to be named new Argos head coach.

https://3downnation.com/2025/12/01/toronto-argonauts-to-name-mike-miller-as-new-head-coach/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 02, 2025, 12:02:10 AM
Quote from: Ridermania on December 01, 2025, 11:52:42 PMMike Miller to be named new Argos head coach.

https://3downnation.com/2025/12/01/toronto-argonauts-to-name-mike-miller-as-new-head-coach/

Wow, Rick Campbell must be feeling unloved.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 02, 2025, 06:23:33 AM
Quote from: Ridermania on December 01, 2025, 11:52:42 PMMike Miller to be named new Argos head coach.

Well, that just made Hogan's job at least 50% safer...
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: blue_gold_84 on December 02, 2025, 01:25:48 PM
Quote from: Tecno on December 02, 2025, 06:23:33 AMWell, that just made Hogan's job at least 50% safer...

I'm hoping this means Condell is the next OC.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on December 02, 2025, 02:35:39 PM
Al's sign Tyson Philpot - Highest paid CDN receiver.

https://3downnation.com/2025/12/02/montreal-alouettes-make-tyson-philpot-highest-paid-canadian-receiver-in-cfl/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on December 02, 2025, 04:49:11 PM
This was not unexpected , he is the top NAT receiver, so pay him accordingly. Good for him
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: BBRT on December 02, 2025, 04:57:20 PM
Quote from: gobombersgo on December 01, 2025, 05:01:19 PMNot only would Toronto need a stadium but the NFL also doesnt allow corporations to own franchises.

I cant see Toronto getting an NFL franchise within the next 15-20 years.

Alot needs to happen in the meantime. The Argos playing in Toronto is a minor concern compared to the other issues.

I did my research on this a number of years ago and there are significant cost impacts to anyone trying to land an NFL franchise in Toronto. I would have to research my findings (buried someone in a file cabinet) but here is what I remember.

First of all everything dollar wise must be in USD (at about 135-440% conversion rate today).

- The current stadium does not qualify in terms of seating numbers - new stadium would need to be built.
- Transfer fees or new franchise fees that would have to be paid will run into multi millions.
- The NFL requires new teams or a change in franchise to put into escrow 7 years (maybe 10 years) operating budget to ensure that the franchise lasts that long. This is a big ticket item.

So getting an NFL team in the Big Smoke just is not going to happen IMHO!
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 02, 2025, 06:16:54 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on December 02, 2025, 02:35:39 PMAl's sign Tyson Philpot - Highest paid CDN receiver.

https://3downnation.com/2025/12/02/montreal-alouettes-make-tyson-philpot-highest-paid-canadian-receiver-in-cfl/


That's a lot of money.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 02, 2025, 06:17:11 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on December 02, 2025, 02:35:39 PMAl's sign Tyson Philpot - Highest paid CDN receiver.

https://3downnation.com/2025/12/02/montreal-alouettes-make-tyson-philpot-highest-paid-canadian-receiver-in-cfl/


Wowsers, $275,000 with a $100k signing bonus, that upsets the apple cart as most GM's were working to keep elite receiver pay around $225k. Hopefully this doesn't increase Demski's price beyond the $225k he currently earns, the team has been paying him a premium for many years and he' isn't getting any younger.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 02, 2025, 08:20:45 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 02, 2025, 06:17:11 PMWowsers, $275,000 with a $100k signing bonus, that upsets the apple cart as most GM's were working to keep elite receiver pay around $225k. Hopefully this doesn't increase Demski's price beyond the $225k he currently earns, the team has been paying him a premium for many years and he' isn't getting any younger.

Looks like the Als used some of the 2025 SMS increase left with $100K singing bonus.  I don't know what Philpot earned in 2025 but in that sense it may be a similar SMS hit for 2026. 

He extended a year in 2025 from his original ELC. Just guessing but maybe he was at $175K for his 4th year? Either way, he's a top receiver regardless of nationality.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 02, 2025, 09:10:18 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 02, 2025, 08:20:45 PMLooks like the Als used some of the 2025 SMS increase left with $100K singing bonus.  I don't know what Philpot earned in 2025 but in that sense it may be a similar SMS hit for 2026. 

He extended a year in 2025 from his original ELC. Just guessing but maybe he was at $175K for his 4th year? Either way, he's a top receiver regardless of nationality.

It's a bit of a risk, Philpot has missed significant time due to injury, participating in only 34 of 54 games over the last 3 seasons.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 02, 2025, 09:13:47 PM
Huff defects to the Argos.

John Hufnagel to join Toronto Argonauts in senior advisory role[/url]

https://3downnation.com/2025/12/02/john-hufnagel-to-join-toronto-argonauts-in-senior-advisory-role/ (https://3downnation.com/2025/12/02/john-hufnagel-to-join-toronto-argonauts-in-senior-advisory-role/)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: markf on December 02, 2025, 09:43:24 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 02, 2025, 09:13:47 PMHuff defects to the Argos.

John Hufnagel to join Toronto Argonauts in senior advisory role[/url]

https://3downnation.com/2025/12/02/john-hufnagel-to-join-toronto-argonauts-in-senior-advisory-role/ (https://3downnation.com/2025/12/02/john-hufnagel-to-join-toronto-argonauts-in-senior-advisory-role/)

That is a big surprise.

Dave Dickensen can take ALL the credit, and blame now.

Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: The Zipp on December 02, 2025, 10:03:44 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 02, 2025, 09:13:47 PMHuff defects to the Argos.

John Hufnagel to join Toronto Argonauts in senior advisory role[/url]

https://3downnation.com/2025/12/02/john-hufnagel-to-join-toronto-argonauts-in-senior-advisory-role/ (https://3downnation.com/2025/12/02/john-hufnagel-to-join-toronto-argonauts-in-senior-advisory-role/)

wow.  never thought i would see that - thought he was a Stamp lifer. 
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on December 02, 2025, 10:49:32 PM
Quote from: The Zipp on December 02, 2025, 10:03:44 PMwow.  never thought i would see that - thought he was a Stamp lifer. 
Indeed that is surprising, shocking acutallym=, but  i guess, he's done everything he can in Calgary, still,  I thought Huffer bled red, nope, now its blue!!
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: GOLDMEMBER on December 02, 2025, 11:00:39 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 02, 2025, 09:13:47 PMHuff defects to the Argos.

John Hufnagel to join Toronto Argonauts in senior advisory role[/url]

https://3downnation.com/2025/12/02/john-hufnagel-to-join-toronto-argonauts-in-senior-advisory-role/ (https://3downnation.com/2025/12/02/john-hufnagel-to-join-toronto-argonauts-in-senior-advisory-role/)

Just a strange move. Whatever huffer is kinda of now.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 02, 2025, 11:01:37 PM
Quote from: dd on December 02, 2025, 10:49:32 PMIndeed that is surprising, shocking acutallym=, but  i guess, he's done everything he can in Calgary, still,  I thought Huffer bled red, nope, now its blue!!

As HC and GM he did well but as President of the Stamps for over 10 years did he really succeed?  Compared to what Wade did in Wpg off the field, the answer is no. Jay McNeil took over as president and introduced the Stampede Bowl in his first year to try and raise their profile and improve attendance.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: bunker on December 02, 2025, 11:30:02 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 02, 2025, 06:17:11 PMWowsers, $275,000 with a $100k signing bonus, that upsets the apple cart as most GM's were working to keep elite receiver pay around $225k. Hopefully this doesn't increase Demski's price beyond the $225k he currently earns, the team has been paying him a premium for many years and he' isn't getting any younger.
I wonder if this is what Brady now sees as his comparable? Not sure I would want to pay him that much. But I am also tired of losing a few of our best players every year because we refuse to pay high salaries.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on December 02, 2025, 11:59:42 PM
The cap for 2026 is likely going to be at least 800k larger than in 2025.

The 400k bump that wasn't used prior to free agency and likely another bump (hopefully announced earlier than last year).

The salaries we are used to seeing are going to increase.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 03, 2025, 06:50:44 AM
Quote from: dd on December 02, 2025, 04:49:11 PMThis was not unexpected , he is the top NAT receiver, so pay him accordingly. Good for him

Philpot can do Kenny-like catches (see ESF), and he's semi-versatile.  He's like a Demski, but with circus, and much younger.  If Demski was 8 years younger he'd probably be getting closer to that kind of money, too.

Personally, I like them both.  It would be hard to choose between them.  But if Demski remains closer to $200 than $300, I'm taking Demski.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 03, 2025, 06:58:25 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 02, 2025, 09:13:47 PMHuff defects to the Argos.

John Hufnagel to join Toronto Argonauts in senior advisory role[/url]

Put me down in the "pigs must be flying" camp, too.  This is insane.  The only thing I can think of is he was kind of ousted by the owners.  Maybe they got tired of losing and empty stands?

Or maybe the idea was he'd retire (he's getting quite old and haggard) and the old codger is doing the "I'm not dead yet!" routine.

My only question is: where are teams getting all the coaches cap space to hire all of these "advisors"?  Same question to WFC with Hall/Jarius.  I smell funny business.  Huff goes from massive pay day head honcho in CGY to be lowly "advisor" in TOR at $100k (or whatever)?  Explain how that makes sense.

Maybe "advisors" are outside the cap?  That would make a lot of sense...
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 03, 2025, 07:00:29 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 02, 2025, 06:17:11 PMWowsers, $275,000 with a $100k signing bonus

It would be a darn shame if Philpot got a season-ender in week 3, a la Schoen... Would really hurt their 2026 campaign, a la WFC 2025...  just saying!  (And while I'm coming up with my Christmas list, how about the same for SSK?)

;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  :o
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on December 03, 2025, 10:32:26 AM
Quote from: Tecno on December 03, 2025, 06:58:25 AMPut me down in the "pigs must be flying" camp, too.  This is insane.  The only thing I can think of is he was kind of ousted by the owners.  Maybe they got tired of losing and empty stands?

Or maybe the idea was he'd retire (he's getting quite old and haggard) and the old codger is doing the "I'm not dead yet!" routine.

My only question is: where are teams getting all the coaches cap space to hire all of these "advisors"?  Same question to WFC with Hall/Jarius.  I smell funny business.  Huff goes from massive pay day head honcho in CGY to be lowly "advisor" in TOR at $100k (or whatever)?  Explain how that makes sense.

Maybe "advisors" are outside the cap?  That would make a lot of sense...


Just the late career Wally Buono move of wondering around collecting a pay check from desperate teams.

Advisors must be outside the cap, but maybe a team like Toronto who doesn't have a lot of people in place needs people to fill in the gaps.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 03, 2025, 01:14:17 PM
Quote from: Jesse on December 02, 2025, 11:59:42 PMThe cap for 2026 is likely going to be at least 800k larger than in 2025.

The 400k bump that wasn't used prior to free agency and likely another bump (hopefully announced earlier than last year).

The salaries we are used to seeing are going to increase.

I doubt there is an additional SMS increase beyond that increase from 2025. There is a question about how much of the 2025 increase is left for any team that they will use before the end of the year.

Obviously some salaries are going to go up. It doesn't go far when a small handful of players are getting $100K increases. Montreal has done that with 2 players already.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: VictorRomano on December 03, 2025, 01:47:37 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 02, 2025, 06:16:54 PMThat's a lot of money.

The Als also signed OL Lestage for 3 years at a total cost of $750k yesterday, making him one of the highest-paid non-QBs in the league.  Can't see where they're gonna have a lot of extra cash for FA when you're paying two different guys at the top of their positional salary grid....unless they simply don't care about the cap.

https://3downnation.com/2025/12/01/montreal-alouettes-make-pier-olivier-lestage-one-of-cfls-highest-paid-non-quarterbacks-sources/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 03, 2025, 06:10:46 PM
Quote from: Tecno on December 03, 2025, 06:58:25 AMPut me down in the "pigs must be flying" camp, too.  This is insane.  The only thing I can think of is he was kind of ousted by the owners.  Maybe they got tired of losing and empty stands?

Or maybe the idea was he'd retire (he's getting quite old and haggard) and the old codger is doing the "I'm not dead yet!" routine.

My only question is: where are teams getting all the coaches cap space to hire all of these "advisors"?  Same question to WFC with Hall/Jarius.  I smell funny business.  Huff goes from massive pay day head honcho in CGY to be lowly "advisor" in TOR at $100k (or whatever)?  Explain how that makes sense.

Maybe "advisors" are outside the cap?  That would make a lot of sense...


Everyone above the GM is exempt from the coaches cap including team presidents, their salary would fall under the operational budget which has no limits.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on December 03, 2025, 07:24:08 PM
Lions make Hatcher, highest paid receiver in the CFL.

The BC Lions have signed 2025 All-CFL wide receiver Keon Hatcher Sr. to a two-year contract extension, the team announced on Wednesday.

The deal is worth a guaranteed $630K and includes a $125K signing bonus, according to TSN's Farhan Lalji, and makes Hatcher the highest-paid non-quarterback in the league.

https://3downnation.com/2025/12/03/b-c-lions-sign-top-cfl-receiver-keon-hatcher-to-multi-year-contract-extension/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 03, 2025, 07:39:36 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on December 03, 2025, 07:24:08 PMLions make Hatcher, highest paid receiver in the CFL.

The BC Lions have signed 2025 All-CFL wide receiver Keon Hatcher Sr. to a two-year contract extension, the team announced on Wednesday.

The deal is worth a guaranteed $630K and includes a $125K signing bonus, according to TSN's Farhan Lalji, and makes Hatcher the highest-paid non-quarterback in the league.

https://3downnation.com/2025/12/03/b-c-lions-sign-top-cfl-receiver-keon-hatcher-to-multi-year-contract-extension/

Insanity. $315K per season? Yikes. That has to be at least a $100K increase if not more.

Lions appear to have some of the 2025 SMS left over as well.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 03, 2025, 08:00:33 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 03, 2025, 07:39:36 PMInsanity. $315K per season? Yikes. That has to be at least a $100K increase if not more.

Lions appear to have some of the 2025 SMS left over as well.

Maybe not and I can't see how they have anything left, but what if the contract doesn't kick in until Jan. 1st?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 03, 2025, 08:08:51 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 03, 2025, 07:39:36 PMInsanity. $315K per season? Yikes. That has to be at least a $100K increase if not more.

Lions appear to have some of the 2025 SMS left over as well.

Receiver salaries are leaping back up to Chris Jones level insanity, Gino Lewis signed with the Elks for $320k in 2023, last season with the RB's he played for $223k.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Waffler on December 03, 2025, 08:26:08 PM
The cap increase is going to the elite players. Predictable. This is far from the last big contract we will see signed this off season.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: blue_gold_84 on December 03, 2025, 08:34:08 PM
$315K for a receiver is insane.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 03, 2025, 08:55:26 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 03, 2025, 08:00:33 PMMaybe not and I can't see how they have anything left, but what if the contract doesn't kick in until Jan. 1st?

Usually a signing bonus is early money being used from remaining SMS paid before the end of the season. We see that every off season. Like most teams, it doesn't appear the Lions padded their 1 game IR to the extent of consuming an extra $400K IMO.

Essentially it's half the reason players get re-signed in December for big raises. It just turns out that bigger is even bigger than normal due to the $400K increase instead of the usual $50K annual SMS increase.

Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 03, 2025, 08:57:26 PM
Quote from: Waffler on December 03, 2025, 08:26:08 PMThe cap increase is going to the elite players. Predictable. This is far from the last big contract we will see signed this off season.

Agreed. The additional SMS will go about 6 - 8 players or less. It's good for them but changes nothing. Same players just getting more money.

The issue is that many of the other players will consider changing teams for another $10K-$20K. The teams spending the $400K on the stars means losing others possibly.

We'll see how many players change teams etc.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Pete on December 03, 2025, 09:00:45 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 03, 2025, 07:39:36 PMInsanity. $315K per season? Yikes. That has to be at least a $100K increase if not more.

Lions appear to have some of the 2025 SMS left over as well.
be interesting to see if there are more details, ie money hid behind marketing money similar to what they did with Roarke. Some teams are gonna have sms money from ly due to the extra 400k that wasn't budgeted in, The cflpa should have been making more noise about this to ensure that it isn't just given to the elite players. The smart teams would have set some of this aside just for this purpose, I wouldn't be surprised if mtrl did this and hence the 100k signing bonus given to Philpot.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 03, 2025, 09:05:17 PM
Quote from: Pete on December 03, 2025, 09:00:45 PMbe interesting to see if there are more details, ie money hid behind marketing money similar to what they did with Roarke. Some teams are gonna have sms money from ly due to the extra 400k that wasn't budgeted in, The cflpa should have been making more noise about this to ensure that it isn't just given to the elite players. The smart teams would have set some of this aside just for this purpose, I wouldn't be surprised if mtrl did this and hence the 100k signing bonus given to Philpot.

That's always been the question. The CFLPA negotiated an increase to the SMS based on increased revenue. Didn't they have a plan on how to use it?

I've suggested a simple solution would be to add 2 - 4 players to the AR. More jobs is a better plan than just giving a few players more money.

More players mean better in game injury protection and development of those players that get game experience.

Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on December 03, 2025, 09:58:40 PM
I'm shocked that anyone is surprised by this. Increased salary cap + marketing money = increased salary.

The stars will get the lions share.

Kenny and Geno hit 300k under the old cap. Hatcher could have gotten more in FA.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 03, 2025, 11:57:08 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on December 03, 2025, 08:34:08 PM$315K for a receiver is insane.

Brady is going to demand $300k, just watch.


$240k for an interior O-lineman is also insane, which is what the Als offered Pier-Olivier Lestage. Time to trend away from 3 Natl's on the O-line and find big young Imports to do the job at half the cost, contingent on finding skilled Natl's to play other positions of course.

You start to understand why the CFL BOG would be happy to do away with the ratio, bottom line it messes up their concept of having an abundant supply of cheap replaceable labour that would significantly lower their operating costs.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on December 04, 2025, 12:35:18 AM
Brady's contract will need to beat Philpot's 275k by a significant margin. He's been way more impactful for a longer period. Multiple awards to his name.

He's going to argue he has great production than Hatcher as well, so his initial ask is probably going to be closer to 350k. He'll listen to all offers and we'll see how much of a deal he'll give us, if any.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 04, 2025, 12:58:27 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 03, 2025, 11:57:08 PMBrady is going to demand $300k, just watch.


$240k for an interior O-lineman is also insane, which is what the Als offered Pier-Olivier Lestage. Time to trend away from 3 Natl's on the O-line and find big young Imports to do the job at half the cost, contingent on finding skilled Natl's to play other positions of course.

You start to understand why the CFL BOG would be happy to do away with the ratio, bottom line it messes up their concept of having an abundant supply of cheap replaceable labour that would significantly lower their operating costs.

If he wants $300K I'd let him walk and thank him for his service.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on December 04, 2025, 01:09:56 AM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 04, 2025, 12:58:27 AMIf he wants $300K I'd let him walk and thank him for his service.

And it's fine to do that in certain instances(we did it with Lawler), but we've also seen our team get worse by watching our talent leave for higher pay elsewhere.

Every team is going to have players making this much money. You're not putting yourself at a disadvantage by keeping your best players.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 04, 2025, 02:15:55 AM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 04, 2025, 12:58:27 AMIf he wants $300K I'd let him walk and thank him for his service.

I'd go $300k, he's the hometown face of the franchise along with Demski, and he's lived up to his side of the bargain.  They'd lose a lot of marketing goodwill and the most complete RB in the league if he was replaced with a cheap import.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: bunker on December 04, 2025, 02:23:00 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 04, 2025, 02:15:55 AMI'd go $300k, he's the hometown face of the franchise along with Demski, and he's lived up to his side of the bargain.  They'd lose a lot of marketing goodwill and the most complete RB in the league if he was replaced with a cheap import.
You also know what you are getting with Brady, as opposed to the free agent flops Walters reeled in last off season.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 04, 2025, 01:00:32 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 04, 2025, 02:15:55 AMI'd go $300k, he's the hometown face of the franchise along with Demski, and he's lived up to his side of the bargain.  They'd lose a lot of marketing goodwill and the most complete RB in the league if he was replaced with a cheap import.

It depends on the import that might replace him. An example would be Rankin from Edmonton. I get the hometown Canadian player but I think we need to upgrade the OL. We don't need to start 9 Canadians.

Bombers have a history of having good import RB's. Reaves, Mimbs and Roberts to name a few. The team hasn't given a serious look at recruiting RB's since he arrived and that's an issue that can be changed.

I'd be sorry to see him go but something has to give. The goal is to win the Grey Cup.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 04, 2025, 01:05:41 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 04, 2025, 02:15:55 AMI'd go $300k, he's the hometown face of the franchise along with Demski, and he's lived up to his side of the bargain.  They'd lose a lot of marketing goodwill and the most complete RB in the league if he was replaced with a cheap import.

Brady has never had the breakaway speed that some RB's have. I mentioned Rankin in another post. He was on an ELC and I'd say he might be the most / more complete RB dual threat.

He just came off his ELC and is probably a potential free agent. He'll want a raise so that's an interesting question and comparison to see what happens.

Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: markf on December 04, 2025, 02:24:05 PM
It's a tough decision both sides of the Brady issue have good points.

The team moved on from Andrew...

I think he stays.,
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: bunker on December 04, 2025, 02:36:32 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 04, 2025, 01:05:41 PMBrady has never had the breakaway speed that some RB's have. I mentioned Rankin in another post. He was on an ELC and I'd say he might be the most / more complete RB dual threat.

He just came off his ELC and is probably a potential free agent. He'll want a raise so that's an interesting question and comparison to see what happens.


Brady is a very good blocker which is important in a passing league. I haven't watched Rankin enough to know how he does in that role. Any idea?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Waffler on December 04, 2025, 02:44:48 PM
Quote from: markf on December 04, 2025, 02:24:05 PMI think he stays.,
I would say so. Didn't Miller step in on the last contract and tell Walters to pay him?  What's changed?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on December 04, 2025, 04:21:59 PM
Quote from: Waffler on December 04, 2025, 02:44:48 PMI would say so. Didn't Miller step in on the last contract and tell Walters to pay him?  What's changed?

Brady might have changed. He took less to stay here before (though it is expensive to move, so maybe the value evens out). But maybe now he wants to max out on perhaps his last top end contract. The team has changed. We're not the class of the league anymore and he says he wants to win championships. Perhaps he believes another team gives him a better shot.

Just like last time, I don't think there's a better fit than Brady and Winnipeg. We are always committed to the run and he becomes more and more involved in the passing game each year. The hometown factor has value for the player and the team. It just makes too much sense.

That said, Brady had a very high opinion of his play. He always has. He was far and away the highest paid RB in the league the last two years. But he still made comments that indicated he more than earned his deal and expects more. It'll be a tough negotiation and one that won't be settled until FA when he hears other teams' offers. So there's a huge domino effect that makes it difficult to sign other players until we know if we're retaining Brady or not. And I feel like Walters would be willing to draw a hard line and walk away, but Wade Miller sees the off the field value of having Brady and will influence things as well. 
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 04, 2025, 04:30:40 PM
Quote from: bunker on December 04, 2025, 02:36:32 PMBrady is a very good blocker which is important in a passing league. I haven't watched Rankin enough to know how he does in that role. Any idea?

That's a fair question and one I don't know the answer. Rankin was just an example. However when / if a team has a RB that has that ability it slows down the pass rush somewhat. The fear of speed by the defence alters the game plan.

I don't think Roberts could block but his elusiveness struck fear into opponents.

Brady fits / is a major part of our game plan and team make up. I hope he stays.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: RebusRankin on December 04, 2025, 04:48:41 PM
Hypothetically, who has the $ to pay Brady? Montreal and BC, I'd say no. The Riders have a ton of big name guys to try to sign. Hamilton has some bigger contracts.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on December 04, 2025, 05:06:50 PM
Quote from: RebusRankin on December 04, 2025, 04:48:41 PMHypothetically, who has the $ to pay Brady? Montreal and BC, I'd say no. The Riders have a ton of big name guys to try to sign. Hamilton has some bigger contracts.

Most teams have 20+ free agents. Everyone has the money.

I'd say Montreal has probably taken themselves out of the running, but at least 2 teams thought they had a chance last year and put in bigger bids than ours. No reason to think it wont happen again.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 04, 2025, 05:13:24 PM
Quote from: RebusRankin on December 04, 2025, 04:48:41 PMHypothetically, who has the $ to pay Brady? Montreal and BC, I'd say no. The Riders have a ton of big name guys to try to sign. Hamilton has some bigger contracts.

Not only that, which team will want that kind of balance between run and pass offence? It's our bread and butter, but Rourke, VAJ, Alexander, BLM are pass oriented.

The reality is where does any team spend money to improve the roster. Money is also spent to retain top players but it also has to find ways to improve other areas.

I don't expect our entire 2025 roster to return or just assume we spend the extra $400K in those salaries. Much has been said about where we should replace players as well as where should we retain players.

Most retention and decisions happens before free agency hits. As that falls into place, we see some additions during free agency.

All of us can name a dozen players we'd like to add beyond our own roster. We'll land some but who or how much it costs is TBD.

Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: blue_or_die on December 04, 2025, 06:06:35 PM
My tinfoil hat theory is that the apparent OC search is being driven to appease Brady into signing/making here a more attractive place to sign.

IMO I felt Brady was underutilized under Hogan all year and it was one of my primary pain points with Hogan. Brady will always say he's not getting the ball often enough.

Even if my hunch isn't true, that effort and willingness to adjust and get better should go a ways for him and other FAs in general.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: VictorRomano on December 04, 2025, 07:43:03 PM
Quote from: blue_or_die on December 04, 2025, 06:06:35 PMIMO I felt Brady was underutilized under Hogan all year and it was one of my primary pain points with Hogan. Brady will always say he's not getting the ball often enough.

When you're arguably the best RB in the entire league and getting less than 15 touches in 6 out of 18 games (and 3 with less than 10 touches) in 2025, I'd be pissed, too.  Brady was criminally underused by Hogan as a weapon in 2025, and that alone should be enough to get Hogan fired.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 04, 2025, 07:44:14 PM
T. Harris re-signs a 1 year extension in Regina. Retirement held off for at least another year.

In Toronto Chad Kelly has been named the starter in 2026 for the Argos. I'd take that to mean Arbuckle will move on but no teams looking for a new # 1 so who offers the most for a #2? Since Kelly's SMS was off the books on 6 game IR, I don't think they can afford to keep Arbuckle IMO.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: blue_or_die on December 04, 2025, 08:04:03 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 04, 2025, 07:44:14 PMT. Harris re-signs a 1 year extension in Regina. Retirement held off for at least another year.


He'll be making bank when you add his 2026 salary to CPP + OAS which I believe he's eligible to collect this year.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on December 04, 2025, 08:08:23 PM
Harris made $450 last season, still haven't heard how much he signed for but it will be very team friendly.

https://3downnation.com/2025/12/04/saskatchewan-roughriders-re-sign-grey-cup-mvp-trevor-harris-for-2026/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 04, 2025, 09:05:17 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on December 04, 2025, 08:08:23 PMHarris made $450 last season, still haven't heard how much he signed for but it will be very team friendly.

https://3downnation.com/2025/12/04/saskatchewan-roughriders-re-sign-grey-cup-mvp-trevor-harris-for-2026/

Winning the Grey Cup probably gets him another $50K? That's seems reasonable IMO but we'll hear more details in the next week or so. This should mean Emilus will want to stay and will re-sign soon.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on December 04, 2025, 09:10:28 PM
Quote from: VictorRomano on December 04, 2025, 07:43:03 PMWhen you're arguably the best RB in the entire league and getting less than 15 touches in 6 out of 18 games (and 3 with less than 10 touches) in 2025, I'd be pissed, too.  Brady was criminally underused by Hogan as a weapon in 2025, and that alone should be enough to get Hogan fired.

He didn't play 18 games though, he played in 14. And he had the 2nd most yards from scrimmage in the entire league.

Over the course of the entire year, Brady was used as much as he ever was and set a career high in receiving yards in only 14 games. In individual games, there were definitely certain situations in which he wasn't utilized, but we also turned the ball over like crazy and put ourselves in early scoring deficits.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on December 04, 2025, 10:54:05 PM
Ya, Brady's situation is an interesting one - he wants more money, I want him to not fumble the ball so much.

We use the run more than any other team in the league, so if we can't give him what he wants, what makes him think another team, that doesn't use the run as much as we do, can??
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: RebusRankin on December 05, 2025, 12:18:31 AM
So Harris takes a team friendly deal and Zach is still happy to be overpaid?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 05, 2025, 01:01:36 AM
Quote from: RebusRankin on December 04, 2025, 04:48:41 PMHypothetically, who has the $ to pay Brady? Montreal and BC, I'd say no. The Riders have a ton of big name guys to try to sign. Hamilton has some bigger contracts.

Obviously Toronto, and they'd take Willy too in a heartbeat if given the opportunity.  After they ditched Carey in TC, the Argo running attack continued downhill throughout the season.  I couldn't even tell you who their #1 RB is right now.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 05, 2025, 01:10:32 AM
Quote from: Ridermania on December 04, 2025, 08:08:23 PMHarris made $450 last season, still haven't heard how much he signed for but it will be very team friendly.

https://3downnation.com/2025/12/04/saskatchewan-roughriders-re-sign-grey-cup-mvp-trevor-harris-for-2026/

You're dreaming, the shoe is now on the other foot and it's about to boot Jeremy O'Day up the ***. T. Harris is done suffering for Sask. he wants to establish his true style.

Common items that represent his bling include:

Chains/Necklaces: Thick, heavy gold or silver chains, especially diamond-studded "iced out" Cuban links.

Pendants: Large, custom pendants, which can feature dollar signs, religious icons, brand logos, or personalized nameplates, often covered in diamonds or other sparkling stones.

Watches: Large, "iced out" watches, often featuring elaborate designs and covered in diamonds to catch the eye and signify success.

Rings/Bracelets: Substantial rings and bracelets, similarly adorned with precious metals and stones.
   
Grillz: Gold or platinum coverings worn over the teeth, sometimes also featuring diamonds or other gems.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on December 05, 2025, 01:10:50 AM
Quote from: RebusRankin on December 05, 2025, 12:18:31 AMSo Harris takes a team friendly deal and Zach is still happy to be overpaid?

Who says he took a team friendly deal?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: RebusRankin on December 05, 2025, 02:43:19 AM
Quote from: Jesse on December 05, 2025, 01:10:50 AMWho says he took a team friendly deal?

Speculation on my part but he took less in 2025 and he discussed taking a team friendly deal then.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on December 05, 2025, 03:00:20 AM
Quote from: RebusRankin on December 05, 2025, 02:43:19 AMSpeculation on my part but he took less in 2025 and he discussed taking a team friendly deal then.

Was it team friendly by choice or because he was 39 and had only played one full season in the previous 6 years with zero playoff success?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 05, 2025, 09:42:58 AM
Quote from: RebusRankin on December 04, 2025, 04:48:41 PMHypothetically, who has the $ to pay Brady? Montreal and BC, I'd say no. The Riders have a ton of big name guys to try to sign. Hamilton has some bigger contracts.

If Brady really wants to bail to be with a team "that can win GCs" then he is limiting his choices to BC, CGY, SSK, MTL.  SSK already has their guy and doesn't need the ratio help.  CGY is a run-first team (under Dickenson T.G.) and could use the ratio help... if anyone makes a big play for Brady, it'd be them.

MTL I think is happy with their Scott ELC wunderkind.  BC is a pass-first team with no ratio needs -- I can't see them being interested blowing $300k+.

(HAM will never get to a cup with BLM, so count them out.  And TOR is now in full rebuild mode.  OTT/EDM, nothing needs to be said.)

So CGY or WPG.  That's it.  We just need to get within $35k of CGY's offer and he'll probably stay.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 05, 2025, 09:45:26 AM
Quote from: Pete on December 03, 2025, 09:00:45 PMbe interesting to see if there are more details, ie money hid behind marketing money similar to what they did with Roarke.

You bet.  The pundit leak was careful in its wording.  "hard money", not "salary".  MMM would count as "hard money".  They did the same misdirection when announcing Rourke in last FA -- gave the "hard money" first, and only told us about the $200k MMM later.

I bet Hatcher is $100k MMM easy.  Maybe $150k.

I would hope we sign Brady with $100k MMM to ease the SMS pain.  It's super easy with Brady -- just sponsor/video-record every dog-saving trip of his.  Voila -- justified MMM.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: RebusRankin on December 05, 2025, 12:47:10 PM
Using the MM to offset Brady's salary is a good idea.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 05, 2025, 05:04:47 PM
Quote from: Tecno on December 05, 2025, 09:42:58 AMIf Brady really wants to bail to be with a team "that can win GCs" then he is limiting his choices to BC, CGY, SSK, MTL.  SSK already has their guy and doesn't need the ratio help.  CGY is a run-first team (under Dickenson T.G.) and could use the ratio help... if anyone makes a big play for Brady, it'd be them.

MTL I think is happy with their Scott ELC wunderkind.  BC is a pass-first team with no ratio needs -- I can't see them being interested blowing $300k+.

(HAM will never get to a cup with BLM, so count them out.  And TOR is now in full rebuild mode.  OTT/EDM, nothing needs to be said.)

So CGY or WPG.  That's it.  We just need to get within $35k of CGY's offer and he'll probably stay.


Dickenson has never been the biggest spender, it goes against the Stamps philosophy of being cheap.

Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: JockitchwithRich on December 05, 2025, 05:37:09 PM
Would appreciate clarification on the acronym of MMM or MM in relation to contracts, nothing with Google

Love the Bombers and great athletes like Brady ...... however Walters is in tough and we already have Peterson
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on December 05, 2025, 07:20:48 PM
Riders sign QB Tommy Stevens for two more seasons.

https://3downnation.com/2025/12/05/mr-automatic-saskatchewan-roughriders-extend-short-yardage-specialist-tommy-stevens-through-2027/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: VictorRomano on December 05, 2025, 07:29:43 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on December 05, 2025, 07:20:48 PMRiders sign QB Tommy Stevens for two more seasons.

https://3downnation.com/2025/12/05/mr-automatic-saskatchewan-roughriders-extend-short-yardage-specialist-tommy-stevens-through-2027/

Dang.  I was hoping he would hit FA and we might be able to take a run at him.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 05, 2025, 07:49:13 PM
Quote from: VictorRomano on December 05, 2025, 07:29:43 PMDang.  I was hoping he would hit FA and we might be able to take a run at him.

Nah far too one dimensional, Strev. had more upside than Stevens, he can't even pretend to be a backup QB.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 05, 2025, 09:17:11 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 05, 2025, 07:49:13 PMNah far too one dimensional, Strev. had more upside than Stevens.

12 pass completions in 68 games. Maybe he should switch to a DE with his size and speed. Or learn to block as a FB.  lol
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Pigskin on December 05, 2025, 10:42:59 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 05, 2025, 09:17:11 PM12 pass completions in 68 games. Maybe he should switch to a DE with his size and speed. Or learn to block as a FB.  lol

Yes excellent SY guy. But your right. 68 games, 12/21 for 83 yards.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: DCM on December 06, 2025, 03:31:19 AM
Quote from: JockitchwithRich on December 05, 2025, 05:37:09 PMWould appreciate clarification on the acronym of MMM or MM in relation to contracts, nothing with Google

Love the Bombers and great athletes like Brady ...... however Walters is in tough and we already have Peterson
MM = marketing money I believe.

Not sure on MMM though. Maxmimum? Minimum?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 06, 2025, 11:32:00 AM
Quote from: DCM on December 06, 2025, 03:31:19 AMMM = marketing money I believe.

Not sure on MMM though. Maxmimum? Minimum?

I added the extra M when Rourke first blew it wide open:

Magic Marketing Money

"Magic" as in bogus and fairy dust complete cheating the CFL allows to work around the SMS being too low to lure super high end players like Rourke.  Show me what Rourke did in '25 to earn $200k MMM.  I rest my case.

Now let's cheat too, WFC has the biggest war chest -- especially after hosting a completely packed GC!  Revamp Zach to get $200k of his existing contract in MMM, and give Brady $150k MMM so his SMS hit is only $200k tops.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 06, 2025, 11:34:43 AM
Quote from: Ridermania on December 05, 2025, 07:20:48 PMRiders sign QB Tommy Stevens for two more seasons.

Smart move.  SSK learned (stole) from WPG that you need a great 97%+ SY guy to win playoffs/cups.

However, Stevens may have upped his ask, as he's now considered the best SY specialist bar none due to his size.  This may be hurting SSK SMS seeing as how they also have to carry "real #2" Maier, who also isn't cheap (as far as lame #2's go).

If they have to pay T.Harris more than his discount salary, they'll quickly have one of the most expensive QB rooms.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 06, 2025, 11:39:40 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 05, 2025, 05:04:47 PMDickenson has never been the biggest spender, it goes against the Stamps philosophy of being cheap.

You are correct.  As such I revise my theory to only WPG can/will sign Brady.  There, everyone can stop worrying now.  KW will get it done, and probably for $275k SMS hit.

In any negotiation I would remind Brady how many times he's coughed up the ball, sometimes in critical games like the ESF when we were about to run away with the win.  And he's getting far less YPC than Oullette because a) he has a worse OL, and b) he doesn't have the magic coach AH33 and can't shed tacklers like AH used to.

As such Scott might be a better RB (right now, I won't speak long term), and Rankin too, and they are/were ELC IMPs!  Whatever premium we pay Brady is for his hometown hero status (which is worth it) and the passport (which is also worth it).  But nothing is worth $325k-$350k.  I'd take Oullette and his best buddy AH33 in tandem for under $200k before wasting $350k of SMS.  That said, if we can put $150k on the BC MMM plan, then by all means pay Brady $350k.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on December 06, 2025, 01:06:06 PM
Maybe Brady to the Riders to be coached by AH33. 
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: blue_gold_84 on December 06, 2025, 03:15:28 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on December 06, 2025, 01:06:06 PMMaybe Brady to the Riders to be coached by AH33. 

This would make sense in the event Oliveira wants to be disowned by an entire province.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 06, 2025, 03:29:12 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on December 06, 2025, 01:06:06 PMMaybe Brady to the Riders to be coached by AH33. 

The Riders will have trouble re-signing their own guys, don't think they will be players in FA.  The shoe is now on the other foot, you are about to experience the pain of losing players you really want to keep.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on December 06, 2025, 04:39:09 PM
Just trying to keep up on all the comments during the off season.

I know Brady won't be coming over to the Riders.

Honestly hope him and Demski stay with the Bombers. 
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Waffler on December 06, 2025, 09:06:49 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on December 06, 2025, 01:06:06 PMMaybe Brady to the Riders to be coached by AH33. 
Even if they let AJ Ouellette walk that's only a $160k saving, well short of Brady's price tag.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 06, 2025, 09:11:02 PM
Riders re-signing of Harris was on team friendly deal. $190K signing bonus ( 2025 SMS money ). That gives them a low SMS hit in 2026. Who said no teams have any SMS left?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 07, 2025, 06:48:04 AM
Quote from: Ridermania on December 06, 2025, 01:06:06 PMMaybe Brady to the Riders to be coached by AH33.

I know you said you're joking, but the reason that can't happen (whether in the green city or the b&g city) is the bridges were burnt.  AH & Brady are now like oil & water.  That's why AH could have never been retained or come back to WPG as our RB coach (even beyond the burnt bridges with KW & MOS).

The decision was made to make this "Brady's team", and the "old" had to be disposed of.  I hope Brady realizes a lot of this is due to him, and he got what he wanted, and was left unobstructed, he was given the keys to the team... he better remember this when he makes his final decision.

That and the fact he's not that good... The CFL NAT RB talent from top down is Cornish, AH, Brady.  He'd good, but he's not Cornish.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on December 07, 2025, 02:25:06 PM
Good explanation Techno!  Thanks
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Waffler on December 07, 2025, 03:31:55 PM
 'They are supposed to know the rules like me.'

https://3downnation.com/2025/12/06/they-are-supposed-to-know-the-rules-andre-proulx-admits-cfl-replay-centre-blew-call-in-elks-stampeders-finale/

Surprised Proulx would say it out loud.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: markf on December 07, 2025, 05:18:59 PM
Quote from: Waffler on December 07, 2025, 03:31:55 PM'They are supposed to know the rules like me.'

https://3downnation.com/2025/12/06/they-are-supposed-to-know-the-rules-andre-proulx-admits-cfl-replay-centre-blew-call-in-elks-stampeders-finale/

Surprised Proulx would say it out loud.

Interesting isn't it?will he be fined?

More importantly, It's not a complicated rule.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on December 07, 2025, 06:24:54 PM
Quote from: Tecno on December 07, 2025, 06:48:04 AMI know you said you're joking, but the reason that can't happen (whether in the green city or the b&g city) is the bridges were burnt.  AH & Brady are now like oil & water.  That's why AH could have never been retained or come back to WPG as our RB coach (even beyond the burnt bridges with KW & MOS).

The decision was made to make this "Brady's team", and the "old" had to be disposed of.  I hope Brady realizes a lot of this is due to him, and he got what he wanted, and was left unobstructed, he was given the keys to the team... he better remember this when he makes his final decision.

That and the fact he's not that good... The CFL NAT RB talent from top down is Cornish, AH, Brady.  He'd good, but he's not Cornish.

I agree, he's not THAT good. He gets a ton of reps so he puts up the stats. Peterson could do the same thing at a fraction of the cost. You can't tell me Brady is worth $160k+ more than Oulette, no way. I'd take Stevie Scott in a heartbeat and his entry level contract anyday.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: bunker on December 07, 2025, 08:43:11 PM
I'd pay Brady what it takes, and use marketing money to make the salary cap structure work. We are the most financially successful franchise in the league. Brady is a hometown star who is an excellent running back, generally pretty durable, has good hands as a receiver, and is also a good blocker, which is crucial in a passing league. It would be a crime to lose him. Especially if we end up paying the money saved by letting him go, to players similar to Logan, J. Jones and Mitchell.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 08, 2025, 09:19:12 AM
Quote from: Waffler on December 07, 2025, 03:31:55 PM'They are supposed to know the rules like me.'

Uh, so Proulx says the rules say it should have remained a TD?  Where do the rules say that?

It sounds like the problem isn't the TD/no-TD, the problem is awarding CGY the ball and moving it to the 30.

I think we can all agree that giving someone a TD that wasn't a TD is pretty criminal.  Yet so is giving CGY the ball at the 30.  What I propose is that a rule carve out should be in place for overturned fumbled TDs just like when other whistled-dead fumbles occur in the middle of the field -- team B gets the ball but zero forward progress.  In that case CGY should have gotten the ball, but at their 1, not their 30.

If the rules don't say this, change them.  And if you don't like the "something after the whistle affected the outcome" problem with this, then make it so that NOTHING after the whistle counts.  In which case Rankin is DBC at the 1YL and EDM gets to punch it in with a sneak.  Just pick one and write it as an unambiguous rule.

Also, part of the blame is on Rankin, who should know by now that he needs to go get that ball.  Whistles be darned.  How many of us were screaming at the screen -- GET THAT BALL!  Instead he starts making faces and looking away even though he's right there next to it.  This isn't rocket science.  Even if you're sure you got the TD, you recover any ambiguous ball.  He was REALLY stupid in this case.  Criminally stupid.  The CGY player was smart.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: blue_gold_84 on December 08, 2025, 03:42:51 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 05, 2025, 05:04:47 PMDickenson has never been the biggest spender, it goes against the Stamps philosophy of being cheap.

His approach could change now that Hufnagel's left the organization: https://www.tsn.ca/cfl/article/hufnagel-joins-argonauts-as-adviser-following-successful-run-in-calgary/

That's a big addition to the Argonaut's front office.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 08, 2025, 04:38:37 PM
Quote from: Waffler on December 07, 2025, 03:31:55 PM'They are supposed to know the rules like me.'

https://3downnation.com/2025/12/06/they-are-supposed-to-know-the-rules-andre-proulx-admits-cfl-replay-centre-blew-call-in-elks-stampeders-finale/

Surprised Proulx would say it out loud.

Poor Andre, I bet this is the first time someone from the media ever contacted him for an interview and being an honest guy he's going to talk.  The league will slap his wrist and Andre won't talk no more.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 08, 2025, 09:46:25 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 08, 2025, 04:38:37 PMPoor Andre, I bet this is the first time someone from the media ever contacted him for an interview and being an honest guy he's going to talk.

Proulx's also the only guy to call "tandem block" in a game since they (re?)added it to the rulebook a few years back.  And he was right.

The league must have b-slapped him so hard, as he hasn't called it since even though it happens dozens of times a season.  Speaking of which ... I need to start the tandem block thread I was meaning to after the ESF debacle...
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on December 08, 2025, 09:57:49 PM
That was a tough call. It would be nice to get a brief explanation from command centre when they do make the call so everyone understands why they made the call. And if Andre didn't agree with the call he should have descretely pleaded his case to get the call changed. He didn't say anything and should have used the same approach when asked to comment on the play . Criticising the play afterwards when you had the chance to plead your case in real time doesn't do anyone any good
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 08, 2025, 10:25:31 PM
Quote from: dd on December 08, 2025, 09:57:49 PMThat was a tough call. It would be nice to get a brief explanation from command centre when they do make the call so everyone understands why they made the call. And if Andre didn't agree with the call he should have descretely pleaded his case to get the call changed.

I thought that was how it was done when plays go to command!  I thought command gathered the opinions & "what I saw" from the head ref and the ref who through that flag.

To think command just takes over and doesn't hear that info at all is somewhat flabbergasting.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Pete on December 09, 2025, 02:14:27 PM
Mtrl has signed Alexander to an extension,  they've locked up much of their core for the next 2 years.
Meanwhile at Bomberland ..crickets.
We've likely missed the boat, the time to do that is when your team is having success
 Machocia is the best gm in the league and its not close.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: blue_gold_84 on December 09, 2025, 02:20:13 PM
Alouettes sign QB Alexander through 2028 (https://www.cfl.ca/2025/12/09/alouettes-extend-davis-alexander-through-2028/)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 09, 2025, 02:33:38 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on December 09, 2025, 02:20:13 PMAlouettes sign QB Alexander through 2028 (https://www.cfl.ca/2025/12/09/alouettes-extend-davis-alexander-through-2028/)

Smart.  He'll be getting to cups 50-80% of the next 5 years.  There goes my dreams of having him replace a retiring Zach.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Waffler on December 09, 2025, 02:47:40 PM
Basically amounts to a one year extension since he had 2 years left anyway. The only odd thing is the timing. Why want a one year contract for 2028 today? From the team's perspective this is great. Their core is solid.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 09, 2025, 03:10:02 PM
Quote from: Waffler on December 09, 2025, 02:47:40 PMBasically amounts to a one year extension since he had 2 years left anyway. The only odd thing is the timing. Why want a one year contract for 2028 today? From the team's perspective this is great. Their core is solid.

Might be using some left over 2025 SMS money.

Bombers just extended Pokey for an additional 2 years into 2028.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on December 09, 2025, 06:04:24 PM
Quote from: Waffler on December 09, 2025, 02:47:40 PMBasically amounts to a one year extension since he had 2 years left anyway. The only odd thing is the timing. Why want a one year contract for 2028 today? From the team's perspective this is great. Their core is solid.

I can't remember exactly how it works, but when you sign for three years, can't teams offer you guaranteed money?

And then as part of the re-structure, throw a bonus onto the 2025 cap.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 09, 2025, 06:10:58 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 09, 2025, 03:10:02 PMMight be using some left over 2025 SMS money.

Bombers just extended Pokey for an additional 2 years into 2028.

Which is odd as they already extended him an extra year when he returned from the NFL in early Sept, he was not due to be a FA.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on December 09, 2025, 06:13:58 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 09, 2025, 06:10:58 PMWhich is odd as they already extended him an extra year when he returned from the NFL in early Sept, he was not due to be a FA.

So this article suggests he was still on his rookie deal (I mean obviously he was, but maybe Kyle tried to be sneaky and the extra year was originally low as well).

https://www.bluebombers.com/2025/12/09/it-definitely-feels-great-to-always-know-ive-got-a-home/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 09, 2025, 06:29:18 PM
Quote from: Jesse on December 09, 2025, 06:13:58 PMSo this article suggests he was still on his rookie deal (I mean obviously he was, but maybe Kyle tried to be sneaky and the extra year was originally low as well).

https://www.bluebombers.com/2025/12/09/it-definitely-feels-great-to-always-know-ive-got-a-home/

Maybe low-balled him but he did sign an extention for 2026 when he came back in Sept.

https://3downnation.com/2025/09/01/winnipeg-blue-bombers-bring-back-ontaria-pokey-wilson-after-nfl-stint/ (https://3downnation.com/2025/09/01/winnipeg-blue-bombers-bring-back-ontaria-pokey-wilson-after-nfl-stint/)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on December 09, 2025, 06:38:46 PM
Yoshi staying in Riderville.  Riders sign OL Jermarcus Hardrick.

https://3downnation.com/2025/12/09/saskatchewan-roughriders-re-sign-award-winning-offensive-lineman-jermarcus-hardrick/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 09, 2025, 06:44:31 PM
Fajardo re-signs with the Elks.

Edmonton Elks sign QB Cody Fajardo to contract extension through 2026 (//http://)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on December 10, 2025, 05:17:10 PM
Ti-cats signed CB Jamal Peters for 2 years at $355k, Dan Ralph is reporting.

Highest paid American CB.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 10, 2025, 05:49:23 PM
Quote from: Jesse on December 10, 2025, 05:17:10 PMTi-cats signed CB Jamal Peters for 2 years at $355k, Dan Ralph is reporting.

Highest paid American CB.

Dammmn, nobodies holding the line, the price for Nichols and Holmie just went up.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 10, 2025, 06:16:39 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 10, 2025, 05:49:23 PMDammmn, nobodies holding the line, the price for Nichols and Holmie just went up.

I don't know. That's only $175K per season and is far from what Ford got as a Canadian starter. Regardless, I think we can expect Holm and Nichols to see something in the same ball park. I'm not sure Peters deal influenced that thought but maybe.

Anyone know what Peters earned in 2025?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 10, 2025, 07:20:09 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 10, 2025, 06:16:39 PMI don't know. That's only $175K per season and is far from what Ford got as a Canadian starter. Regardless, I think we can expect Holm and Nichols to see something in the same ball park. I'm not sure Peters deal influenced that thought but maybe.

Anyone know what Peters earned in 2025?

9) Jamal Peters, Hamilton Tiger-Cats (A)

Hard money: $144,750
Maximum value: $149,750

The Ticats kept their prized lockdown cornerback in town by way of an in-season extension last year, a deal which included a $42,500 signing bonus for the the East Division all-star. Peters can earn a bonus of $2,000 if he improves to All-CFL status in 2025 and another $3,000 if he wins a major league award.

Kramdi was 2 spots above him as the Bombers highest paid DB.

7) Redha Kramdi, Winnipeg Blue Bombers (N)

Hard money: $145,000
Maximum value: $151,000

Winnipeg's Canadian strong-side linebacker is paid like a ratio breaker and has $20,604 in guaranteed salary in the final year of his current. Kramdi can also take home up to $6,000 in all-star and award incentives – something he's long overdue to cash in on as one of the league's most underrated players.

Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: VictorRomano on December 11, 2025, 01:40:29 PM
BLM signs a 2 year extension in Hamilton:

https://www.cfl.ca/2025/12/11/bo-levi-mitchell-ticats-agree-to-two-year-extension/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 11, 2025, 06:12:11 PM
CFL closes investigation into alleged Argonauts tampering with Riders' Corey Mace.

https://3downnation.com/2025/12/11/cfl-closes-investigation-into-alleged-argonauts-tampering-with-riders-corey-mace/ (https://3downnation.com/2025/12/11/cfl-closes-investigation-into-alleged-argonauts-tampering-with-riders-corey-mace/)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 11, 2025, 06:30:49 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 11, 2025, 06:12:11 PMCFL closes investigation into alleged Argonauts tampering with Riders' Corey Mace.

Didn't even know there was one!  Boy, that must have Pinball steaming to let Mace walk and then Dinwiddie bails and leaves you with nothing...

Good.  I hope TOR is in the gutter again.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 11, 2025, 07:03:00 PM
Quote from: Tecno on December 11, 2025, 06:30:49 PMDidn't even know there was one!  Boy, that must have Pinball steaming to let Mace walk and then Dinwiddie bails and leaves you with nothing...

Good.  I hope TOR is in the gutter again.

The article speculates it might have had something to do with John Murphy who was fired shortly afterward, but that seems like a stretch.  JC Abbott does a good job of reviewing some of the bigger tampering scandals from the past later in that article.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Waffler on December 11, 2025, 08:31:01 PM
https://3downnation.com/2025/12/11/montreal-alouettes-release-lb-darnell-sankey-amidst-ratio-change/

Sankey released early.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 11, 2025, 09:34:28 PM
Quote from: Waffler on December 11, 2025, 08:31:01 PMhttps://3downnation.com/2025/12/11/montreal-alouettes-release-lb-darnell-sankey-amidst-ratio-change/

Sankey released early.

I wonder where he'll end up. He still has some mileage left in the tank but SMS hit?  3rd overall in DT's behind T.Jones by only 1 and only 1 year older.

Maybe Ottawa as a destination?

Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: markf on December 11, 2025, 09:43:58 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 11, 2025, 09:34:28 PMI wonder where he'll end up. He still has some mileage left in the tank but SMS hit?  3rd overall in DT's behind T.Jones by only 1 and only 1 year older.

Maybe Ottawa as a destination?



Calgary
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 11, 2025, 11:14:32 PM
Quote from: markf on December 11, 2025, 09:43:58 PMCalgary

Stamps seem to be pretty happy with Jacob Roberts at MLB with Bighill and Teitz backing him up.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on December 11, 2025, 11:20:14 PM
Quote from: Waffler on December 11, 2025, 08:31:01 PMhttps://3downnation.com/2025/12/11/montreal-alouettes-release-lb-darnell-sankey-amidst-ratio-change/

Sankey released early.
I am surprised by this move, boy talk about gratitude. He comes over there in 2023, provided great leadership and performed like an all star, was the key cog in them winning the Grey Cup, only to be released. Ouch. I think its a mistake, the guys a killer/owns the middle of the field. solid player for someone to pickup and who does montreal have to fill in for him??
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 12, 2025, 12:04:44 AM
Quote from: dd on December 11, 2025, 11:20:14 PMI am surprised by this move, boy talk about gratitude. He comes over there in 2023, provided great leadership and performed like an all star, was the key cog in them winning the Grey Cup, only to be released. Ouch. I think its a mistake, the guys a killer/owns the middle of the field. solid player for someone to pickup and who does montreal have to fill in for him??

They just extended their Canadian MLB for another 2 years. That must have cost them some SMS. Sankey had a salary of about $181K which is $50K more than T. Jones as reference.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: markf on December 12, 2025, 02:19:48 AM
Quote from: dd on December 11, 2025, 11:20:14 PMI am surprised by this move, boy talk about gratitude. He comes over there in 2023, provided great leadership and performed like an all star, was the key cog in them winning the Grey Cup, only to be released. Ouch. I think its a mistake, the guys a killer/owns the middle of the field. solid player for someone to pickup and who does montreal have to fill in for him??

It seems maciocia is cold blooded as far as these decisions go. Seems to be paying off.

Another example is Fajardo
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Pete on December 12, 2025, 02:59:41 AM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 11, 2025, 09:34:28 PMI wonder where he'll end up. He still has some mileage left in the tank but SMS hit?  3rd overall in DT's behind T.Jones by only 1 and only 1 year older.

Maybe Ottawa as a destination?


I could see Ottawa going after Sankey, they need to change their losing culture. Although with Dinwiddie there they may be going after Mcmanus.
I agree Calgary is another possibliity but you never know what history exists with an old team
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 17, 2025, 07:42:10 PM
Heard the Riders just signed DT Devin Adams, we'll probably never know why the Bombers let him go.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 17, 2025, 08:39:19 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 17, 2025, 07:42:10 PMHeard the Riders just signed DT Devin Adams, we'll probably never know why the Bombers let him go.

I guess he was on PR to end the year?  It's not FA yet, otherwise.

They seem pleased as punch over their on their forum.  I would have thought SSK wouldn't need any new DL given how they had so many monsters last year.  I guess they are prepping for half the team to leave on big $$ FA snipes.

There's a reason MOS/Younger chose not to dress him very much.  He's not the answer, no loss.  Seemed like a nice enough guy, though.

But now we have to worry about Adams spilling the beans to SSK on our Super Duper Effective DT/DL strategy secrets!   /s
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on December 17, 2025, 10:53:24 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 17, 2025, 07:42:10 PMHeard the Riders just signed DT Devin Adams, we'll probably never know why the Bombers let him go.
I thought he played decent, when he played. He had a decent motor, decent speed and was powerful. I could never figure why we kept pulling him out so figured it was a ratio thing. He'll do good in Riderville
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Pete on December 18, 2025, 01:39:32 AM
Quote from: dd on December 17, 2025, 10:53:24 PMI thought he played decent, when he played. He had a decent motor, decent speed and was powerful. I could never figure why we kept pulling him out so figured it was a ratio thing. He'll do good in Riderville
he could play end and tackle due to his athleticism but not particularly effective at either one. He started off the year as a starter so had the opportunity but didn't really take advantage.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on December 18, 2025, 02:13:05 PM
Quote from: Pete on December 18, 2025, 01:39:32 AMhe could play end and tackle due to his athleticism but not particularly effective at either one. He started off the year as a starter so had the opportunity but didn't really take advantage.

If I were him I'd leave too. He watched Jake Thomas stand around at nose for 10 weeks, collect game cheques, and likely had some feelings. In Regina he's going to have a chance to actually hit quarterbacks so he's bound to look better just from the sheer fact they (and the rest of the football world) believe pressure is important.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: theaardvark on December 18, 2025, 04:54:39 PM
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on December 18, 2025, 02:13:05 PMIf I were him I'd leave too. He watched Jake Thomas stand around at nose for 10 weeks, collect game cheques, and likely had some feelings. In Regina he's going to have a chance to actually hit quarterbacks so he's bound to look better just from the sheer fact they (and the rest of the football world) believe pressure is important.

I get that you HATE Jake, but I don't think he could ever be accused of "standing around" ever.  Would he ever lead the league in tackles/pressures?  Nope.  But if there was an award for effort and heart... sure, I cry whenever I rewatch Rudy, and I am a sucker for hard work and perseverance, but Jake is more than his numbers.  He would not be on an MOS team if he wasn't.

If THAT is what caused Adams to move on, good riddance.  Could just be the fact that as an American he needed to perform better to earn a spot, and he didn't.  And didn't show enough upside to keep him around.  As to his heart, I don't know, but I wish him well in SSK.

Our "scrapheap" DL losses haven't seemed to light things up in recent years.  Sure, the players signed away that we wanted to keep have done well, and may have actually earned the contracts they got.  But there haven't been any "prospects" that have moved on that I can remember thinking "Oh, we shoulda kept him".

We will have some interesting prospects at DL in camp, I have no doubt.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 18, 2025, 05:29:56 PM
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on December 18, 2025, 02:13:05 PMIf I were him I'd leave too. He watched Jake Thomas stand around at nose for 10 weeks, collect game cheques, and likely had some feelings. In Regina he's going to have a chance to actually hit quarterbacks so he's bound to look better just from the sheer fact they (and the rest of the football world) believe pressure is important.

He didn't leave. We pushed him out the door intentionally when we didn't move him to the 1 game IR to end the season. We can debate whether that was a good decision or a bad decision but it was the decision at the end of the season.

I can't imagine he'd decline a 1 game pay check before becoming a free agent ending his 2 year ELC.

Can he make the Riders roster? Depends on what happens during free agency or injuries in TC. I wish him well.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: BBRT on December 18, 2025, 05:51:55 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on December 18, 2025, 04:54:39 PMI get that you HATE Jake, but I don't think he could ever be accused of "standing around" ever.  Would he ever lead the league in tackles/pressures?  Nope.  But if there was an award for effort and heart... sure, I cry whenever I rewatch Rudy, and I am a sucker for hard work and perseverance, but Jake is more than his numbers.  He would not be on an MOS team if he wasn't.

If THAT is what caused Adams to move on, good riddance.  Could just be the fact that as an American he needed to perform better to earn a spot, and he didn't.  And didn't show enough upside to keep him around.  As to his heart, I don't know, but I wish him well in SSK.

Our "scrapheap" DL losses haven't seemed to light things up in recent years.  Sure, the players signed away that we wanted to keep have done well, and may have actually earned the contracts they got.  But there haven't been any "prospects" that have moved on that I can remember thinking "Oh, we shoulda kept him".

We will have some interesting prospects at DL in camp, I have no doubt.

I don't think anyone hates Jake! He is just long past his best before date and if you fail to understand that aspect than that's on you!
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 18, 2025, 05:59:48 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on December 18, 2025, 04:54:39 PMI get that you HATE Jake, but I don't think he could ever be accused of "standing around" ever.  Would he ever lead the league in tackles/pressures?  Nope.  But if there was an award for effort and heart... sure, I cry whenever I rewatch Rudy, and I am a sucker for hard work and perseverance, but Jake is more than his numbers.  He would not be on an MOS team if he wasn't.

If THAT is what caused Adams to move on, good riddance.  Could just be the fact that as an American he needed to perform better to earn a spot, and he didn't.  And didn't show enough upside to keep him around.  As to his heart, I don't know, but I wish him well in SSK.

Our "scrapheap" DL losses haven't seemed to light things up in recent years.  Sure, the players signed away that we wanted to keep have done well, and may have actually earned the contracts they got.  But there haven't been any "prospects" that have moved on that I can remember thinking "Oh, we shoulda kept him".

We will have some interesting prospects at DL in camp, I have no doubt.

It could have come down to a voluntary participation issue, as many things do in life and at work, engagement that define a persons attitude towards making sacrifices, getting the job done and exhibiting leadership. 

Lack of effort isn't one of Jake's traits, in addition to taking the majority of DT snaps he often participates on the punt team and as a front line submariner on short yardage plays. He may not be the best at any of these jobs but he's first in line to do whatever needs to be done to help out the team.

 
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: bluebeard on December 18, 2025, 06:44:13 PM
I wouldn't read to much into this as after 2 years the staff should know his ceiling.  Looks like the Riders are loading up for TC.  Mace loves his DL players.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: theaardvark on December 18, 2025, 07:51:31 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 18, 2025, 05:29:56 PMHe didn't leave. We pushed him out the door intentionally when we didn't move him to the 1 game IR to end the season. We can debate whether that was a good decision or a bad decision but it was the decision at the end of the season.

I can't imagine he'd decline a 1 game pay check before becoming a free agent ending his 2 year ELC.

Can he make the Riders roster? Depends on what happens during free agency or injuries in TC. I wish him well.

There's a subtle difference between "push him out the door" and "move on from him".  This is the latter.  Releasing a player with a current contract is "pushing him out the door".
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 18, 2025, 10:10:53 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on December 18, 2025, 07:51:31 PMThere's a subtle difference between "push him out the door" and "move on from him".  This is the latter.  Releasing a player with a current contract is "pushing him out the door".

As far as I know he would have been a free agent at the end of December. The team choose to not add him to the 1 game IR. Even if his contract was expiring adding him would have suggested they may have wanted to re-sign him. OTOH, pushing him to PR to immediately become a free agent after the last game indicated otherwise.

The same applied to Kornelson and Person both put on PR to end the season.

You can draw the distinction wherever you choose but either way it's moot. All 3 are gone and free to sign elsewhere.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: markf on December 18, 2025, 10:43:32 PM
I read today that D lineman Oakman who was recently turfed from the ALS, was a top NFL prospect while in College.

Kind of surprised me, he was good, but not really close tomthe best d lineman in the CFL.

" 2016 NFL Draft Expectations: Entering the 2015 season, Oakman has a big range. If he plays well and improves, the first round is possible as it only takes one team to fall in love for Thursday night, plus he could fit in any NFL defense. If Oakman falls to the second day, he shouldn't be lower than a third-rounder with the second round looking like a safe bet."
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 18, 2025, 10:45:29 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 18, 2025, 10:10:53 PMAs far as I know he would have been a free agent at the end of December. The team choose to not add him to the 1 game IR. Even if his contract was expiring adding him would have suggested they may have wanted to re-sign him. OTOH, pushing him to PR to immediately become a free agent after the last game indicated otherwise.

The same applied to Kornelson and Person both put on PR to end the season.

You can draw the distinction wherever you choose but either way it's moot. All 3 are gone and free to sign elsewhere.

True and the Bombers rarely second guess themselves and bring back players they leave on the PR at the end of each season.  Adams had 2 seasons to impress the staff and failed to do so, in Sask. he will be competing against veterans Rose and Micah Johnson,


Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: blue_gold_84 on December 19, 2025, 05:23:02 PM
Lions re-sign OL Couture through 2027 (https://www.cfl.ca/2025/12/19/lions-extend-national-offensive-lineman-michael-couture/)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 19, 2025, 06:55:21 PM
Lions also signed Sankey. I wonder how much that cost?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 19, 2025, 07:26:01 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 19, 2025, 06:55:21 PMLions also signed Sankey. I wonder how much that cost?

Micah Awe might be on the move once again after putting up 118 DT's last season. Never liked his style but he is a durable workhorse.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 19, 2025, 08:54:58 PM
Very informative interview with Jim Barker on the operations level, breaks down a lot of the front office jobs and the division between coaching, GM and player personnel duties.  Good thing he loves to talk, you'd never get this much information out of any other CFL GM.

Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on December 21, 2025, 02:49:30 AM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 19, 2025, 06:55:21 PMLions also signed Sankey. I wonder how much that cost?
I just don't get Montreal letting him go, good on the Lions, their D just got better
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: GOLDMEMBER on December 21, 2025, 11:09:01 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 19, 2025, 08:54:58 PMVery informative interview with Jim Barker on the operations level, breaks down a lot of the front office jobs and the division between coaching, GM and player personnel duties.  Good thing he loves to talk, you'd never get this much information out of any other CFL GM.

;)  he is a yapper.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: RebusRankin on December 21, 2025, 02:29:54 PM
Quote from: dd on December 21, 2025, 02:49:30 AMI just don't get Montreal letting him go, good on the Lions, their D just got better

They are going Canadian (and likely cheaper for now) at that spot.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 21, 2025, 02:46:56 PM
Quote from: dd on December 21, 2025, 02:49:30 AMI just don't get Montreal letting him go, good on the Lions, their D just got better

Could be. Not sure what happens with Awe or other costs in SMS as some players may be lost. A little like the same question about Sankey signing in Winnipeg. Great player but does he start of become a DI / rotation player and what is the additional hit to the SMS.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 23, 2025, 06:58:49 AM
Quote from: RebusRankin on December 21, 2025, 02:29:54 PMThey are going Canadian (and likely cheaper for now) at that spot.

It's a function of making the cup 2 out of 3 years.  Just like SSK will find out -- GC teams get sniped.  Can't keep 'em all.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 23, 2025, 06:59:46 AM
Quote from: theaardvark on December 18, 2025, 07:51:31 PMThere's a subtle difference between "push him out the door" and "move on from him".  This is the latter.

"Show him the door"?  Or maybe "leave the door open"?  Definitely something to do with doors and a lack of shuttedness.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 23, 2025, 07:00:39 AM
Quote from: BBRT on December 18, 2025, 05:51:55 PMI don't think anyone hates Jake!

Uh, you're on MBB, aren't you?  :D  The Jake-hate runs strong through that one...
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 23, 2025, 07:03:25 AM
Quote from: theaardvark on December 18, 2025, 04:54:39 PMOur "scrapheap" DL losses haven't seemed to light things up in recent years.

The only good one who did anything after leaving was Sayles.  He's been solid this whole time, and rarely injured.  Everyone else quickly got injured and/or retired.  Even Walker just IR'd and disappeared.  Add in Stove, Nevis...

So I guess if you add up all the numbers we were very smart to let them all walk.  We couldn't have tied up all that massive SMS to keep everyone each FA just to have them all be busts, save one... however nice it would have been to have Sayles powering the DL all these years.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: theaardvark on December 23, 2025, 04:12:29 PM
Quote from: Tecno on December 23, 2025, 07:03:25 AMThe only good one who did anything after leaving was Sayles.  He's been solid this whole time, and rarely injured.  Everyone else quickly got injured and/or retired.  Even Walker just IR'd and disappeared.  Add in Stove, Nevis...

So I guess if you add up all the numbers we were very smart to let them all walk.  We couldn't have tied up all that massive SMS to keep everyone each FA just to have them all be busts, save one... however nice it would have been to have Sayles powering the DL all these years.


And those weren't "scrap heap", those were players offered premium contracts to leave. 

DL is a place we've been spoiled at since DB97.  More often than not, we have 1 or 2 of the top DL in the league.  Out of 36 starters on the DL, that's pretty awesome.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 23, 2025, 05:17:43 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on December 23, 2025, 04:12:29 PMAnd those weren't "scrap heap", those were players offered premium contracts to leave. 

DL is a place we've been spoiled at since DB97.  More often than not, we have 1 or 2 of the top DL in the league.  Out of 36 starters on the DL, that's pretty awesome.

I don't think this is true, other than the 2 Jeff's period the pass rush has not been that great, even though they had a few series of outstanding individuals like Jamaal Westerman.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 23, 2025, 05:24:46 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 21, 2025, 02:46:56 PMCould be. Not sure what happens with Awe or other costs in SMS as some players may be lost. A little like the same question about Sankey signing in Winnipeg. Great player but does he start of become a DI / rotation player and what is the additional hit to the SMS.

B.C. Lions release pending CFL free-agent LB Josh Woods to make room for Sankey.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 23, 2025, 05:42:16 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 23, 2025, 05:24:46 PMB.C. Lions release pending CFL free-agent LB Josh Woods to make room for Sankey.

I saw that. He was most often listed at WIL along with Hladik but IIRC both lined up at multiple spots depending on injury situations.

All this doesn't quite answer the question about Awe. He's played WIL in the past. I'm not sure if Sankey is only a MLB type. Hladik ( $145K ) is currently a potential free agent as is Auclair ($131K). So WIL seems as an open spot on the roster at the moment.

So who plays where with the addition of Sankey is a TBD along with cumulative SMS costs at the position.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 23, 2025, 05:50:46 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 23, 2025, 05:42:16 PMI saw that. He was most often listed at WIL along with Hladik but IIRC both lined up at multiple spots depending on injury situations.

All this doesn't quite answer the question about Awe. He's played WIL in the past. I'm not sure if Sankey is only a MLB type. Hladik is currently a potential free agent.

So who plays where with the addition of Sankey is a TBD along with cumulative SMS costs at the position.

Sankey is an old school MLB, great against the run but not against the pass, Awe is more versatile, if they played them both it would be pretty scary.  Hladik is the prize, I'd be surprised if BC let him walk away without an attempt to re-sign him.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: theaardvark on December 23, 2025, 06:01:17 PM
Sankey at MLB, Awe at WIL is a Team 100 level pairing...  although not as clean.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 24, 2025, 02:35:39 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 23, 2025, 05:17:43 PMI don't think this is true, other than the 2 Jeff's period the pass rush has not been that great, even though they had a few series of outstanding individuals like Jamaal Westerman.

Looking at just the DTs, we have had league-top guys pass through here.  Nevis, Stove, Sayles, Walker.  Even Poop was pretty darn stout... until he didn't FIFO.

We haven't had a monster DT since Sayles or Walker.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 24, 2025, 01:22:32 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 23, 2025, 05:50:46 PMSankey is an old school MLB, great against the run but not against the pass, Awe is more versatile, if they played them both it would be pretty scary.  Hladik is the prize, I'd be surprised if BC let him walk away without an attempt to re-sign him.

Depth would great but getting everyone on the field or playing time plus SMS issue. It was the reason why it was not a good idea for the Bombers to consider Sankey.

Maybe Hladik won't re-sign and negotiations were not going well? He could be another Canadian looking for $200K+ as a starter.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: theaardvark on December 24, 2025, 05:45:36 PM
I can't see BC spending a lot on ratio breakers this year.  They have Rourke, Betts, Covington, Beaulieu, Cotoy, McInnis...  and that's 6 without any Oline.

They can easily move on from Hladik if $SMS is a concern
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 24, 2025, 05:51:36 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on December 24, 2025, 05:45:36 PMI can't see BC spending a lot on ratio breakers this year.  They have Rourke, Betts, Covington, Beaulieu, Cotoy, McInnis...  and that's 6 without any Oline.

They can easily move on from Hladik if $SMS is a concern

I get the feeling that Covington might be out as well from local rumours.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 24, 2025, 06:40:15 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 24, 2025, 01:22:32 PMDepth would great but getting everyone on the field or playing time plus SMS issue. It was the reason why it was not a good idea for the Bombers to consider Sankey.

Maybe Hladik won't re-sign and negotiations were not going well? He could be another Canadian looking for $200K+ as a starter.

I don't see Hladik as a top tier LB compared to the best Imports, but he is a very good Natl. LB who should command a salary similar to Kramdi.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: VictorRomano on December 24, 2025, 07:18:25 PM
Emilus re-signs in Saskatchewan. :(
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 25, 2025, 03:54:09 AM
Quote from: VictorRomano on December 24, 2025, 07:18:25 PMEmilus re-signs in Saskatchewan. :(

Absolutely no shock there.  They need to keep the NAT REC ratio up so they can go all (or all but 1) IMP on D, or use 3 IMP OL.

Is K.Johnson in FA this year?  That's the real prize (but no passport).
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on December 26, 2025, 02:20:13 PM
Quote from: Tecno on December 25, 2025, 03:54:09 AMAbsolutely no shock there.  They need to keep the NAT REC ratio up so they can go all (or all but 1) IMP on D, or use 3 IMP OL.

Is K.Johnson in FA this year?  That's the real prize (but no passport).


Riders have an abundance of CDN receivers which makes the ratio work for them.

Yes, Johnson is a free agent.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 26, 2025, 05:16:27 PM
Quote from: Tecno on December 25, 2025, 03:54:09 AMAbsolutely no shock there.  They need to keep the NAT REC ratio up so they can go all (or all but 1) IMP on D, or use 3 IMP OL.

Is K.Johnson in FA this year?  That's the real prize (but no passport).


Johnson was #4 in receiving yards, Dohnte Meyers #7, they won't be able to keep them both at the price elite receivers are now commanding after paying Emulus around $300k. Riders have become a fat juicy berry bush for the plucking.  Also imports Joe Robustelli, Shawn Bane, NI's Tommy Nield, KSB and Mitchell Picton, not all these guys deserve big contracts, but 1 or 2 of them could fit on the Bombers roster fairly well.  Question is are the Bombers looking to upgrade 2nd tier Natl. Clercius?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: M.O.A.B. on December 26, 2025, 05:42:28 PM
Robustelli might be a good steal. He will not be a high-price FA, I think. He had a decent production on his 12 games last year - 500+ yds and 3 TDs.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 26, 2025, 06:51:39 PM
Quote from: M.O.A.B. on December 26, 2025, 05:42:28 PMRobustelli might be a good steal. He will not be a high-price FA, I think. He had a decent production on his 12 games last year - 500+ yds and 3 TDs.

Agree, but the Riders might be able to retain him at a lower cost and let more expensive options walk like Meyers and KSB. Don't think he's worth $200k, but he'd fit in nice as a #3 or #4.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 27, 2025, 08:19:19 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 26, 2025, 05:16:27 PMJohnson was #4 in receiving yards, Dohnte Meyers #7

Deceiving (yards).  Meyers was the homerun WR, Johnson was the clutch SB.  Meyers would catch them way down field make a guy miss and get 70YDS.  Johnson was doing the hard work and making spectacular grabs.

Meyers looked to be nothing special -- maybe a route guy, not a hands guy.

Johnson is the guy who will make the stabs and get you 1st downs.

Looking at stats though, it appears those who didn't watch every game may think Meyers is the guy deserving of the big $$ FA!  If Johnson for some odd reason is going for cheap, I'm all over that!!  Man would he be good as a solution to our short game woes.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 27, 2025, 05:16:48 PM
Quote from: Tecno on December 27, 2025, 08:19:19 AMDeceiving (yards).  Meyers was the homerun WR, Johnson was the clutch SB.  Meyers would catch them way down field make a guy miss and get 70YDS.  Johnson was doing the hard work and making spectacular grabs.

Meyers looked to be nothing special -- maybe a route guy, not a hands guy.

Johnson is the guy who will make the stabs and get you 1st downs.

Looking at stats though, it appears those who didn't watch every game may think Meyers is the guy deserving of the big $$ FA!  If Johnson for some odd reason is going for cheap, I'm all over that!!  Man would he be good as a solution to our short game woes.

You've just described Zach's ideal receiver.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 27, 2025, 07:31:12 PM
Reblacks acquire N. Morgan from the Elks. Santos-Knox is currently a potential free agent.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 28, 2025, 03:47:05 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 27, 2025, 05:16:48 PMYou've just described Zach's ideal receiver.

Ya, ok.  But one problem: we have 3 of those already!!  Pokey, Wheatie, Demski are all thinner/speed guys who can go wide out and get a 70Y TD with YAC.

We don't have a bruiser with hands for the short game.  Kenny kind of did that for us a bit when he'd cut inside (those TDs in '24 WDF were amazing).  But even he wasn't ideal there (too skinny & frail).

As such I'd take Johnson over Meyers.  But only for cheap.  In general I don't like all the Green retreads we take in.  I'm not expecting we take any greeners this FA.  Let the other hyenas pounce and steal that GC meat.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on December 28, 2025, 04:16:59 AM
I think the rider receivers will re sign with the riders, they've got a good thing going, I m sure oday will make them competitive offers and they haven't overcommitted to their star players like we and other teams have. They have more cap space than most teams
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 28, 2025, 09:38:15 AM
Quote from: dd on December 28, 2025, 04:16:59 AMI think the rider receivers will re sign with the riders, they've got a good thing going, I m sure oday will make them competitive offers and they haven't overcommitted to their star players like we and other teams have. They have more cap space than most teams

I'm of the opposite mind.  I think they are in cap heck, and I think the FA sniping will be massive.  Yeah, their O was super budget, but they spent a ton on that D last year -- way more than we did.

Any superstars coming off ELCs will want to get paid.  SSK can't afford to keep many.  The vets in FA will want a bump after they "deserve it" for winning the GC.  And since the SSK system doesn't require top/expensive RECs I think they dump anyone who asks for more than a modest bump.  They'll just draft more Busbys and Pictons to fill the void.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 28, 2025, 01:41:34 PM
Teams that had any 2025 SMS left probably have spent that by now or close to it. We may see some players signed but bonus money probably due at the beginning of February.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 28, 2025, 01:48:32 PM
Quote from: dd on December 28, 2025, 04:16:59 AMI think the rider receivers will re sign with the riders, they've got a good thing going, I m sure oday will make them competitive offers and they haven't overcommitted to their star players like we and other teams have. They have more cap space than most teams

The problem is, due to injury the Riders have accumulated a swatch of receivers that probably think they should be starters and are unlikely to accept being designated as backups.  A little more than a month ago they started 4 Natl's and 1 Import in the GC in order to accomodate a 4 Import O-line as well as a 4 import D-line, that ratio became their bread and butter and fairly sure they don't want to alter it.

Imports
BANE Jr. Shawn
JOHNSON, KeeSean
MEYERS, Dohnte
ROBUSTELLI, Joe

Natl.
Ajou
Busby
EMILUS, Samuel

NIELD, Tommy
PICTON, Mitchell
SCHAFFER-BAKER, Kian

Bolded are already under contract.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on December 29, 2025, 02:43:03 AM
Ya the riders have the luxury of having several capable receivers to re sign. Sure they ll lose some to FA, but they are deep in receivers so losing 1 or 2 isn't going to break their back.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Pete on December 29, 2025, 03:18:14 AM
Quote from: dd on December 29, 2025, 02:43:03 AMYa the riders have the luxury of having several capable receivers to re sign. Sure they ll lose some to FA, but they are deep in receivers so losing 1 or 2 isn't going to break their back.
the recievers numbers may be overstated as the thing they had in common was a very accurate qb. I dont think Meyers or Bane would fair as well in our offence.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 29, 2025, 01:58:06 PM
Emulus SMS goes from $168K to $285K.  That's about 1/4 of the SMS increase.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on December 29, 2025, 02:05:22 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 29, 2025, 01:58:06 PMEmulus SMS goes from $168K to $285K.  That's about 1/4 of the SMS increase.

That tracks with the other high end Canadian salaries so far.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 29, 2025, 02:39:38 PM
Quote from: Jesse on December 29, 2025, 02:05:22 PMThat tracks with the other high end Canadian salaries so far.

Probably. The larger question is how much 2025 SMS was left and used by each team and what happens with new SMS in 2026.

I'm all for players getting more but as I've said, just giving a lot more to a select few doesn't improve the roster.

It does seem that some teams had some 2025 SMS left so there should still be some big spending to come in free agency.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on December 29, 2025, 02:52:32 PM
Can't see Shawn Bane Jr. being offered a contract from the Riders.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 29, 2025, 05:17:30 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on December 29, 2025, 02:52:32 PMCan't see Shawn Bane Jr. being offered a contract from the Riders.

Agree and they might keep Robustelli over Meyers for his versatility. On the Natl. side KSB probably goes to FA to get paid what he thinks he's worth while they try to re-sign Tommy Nield and Picton for his flexibility and backup ability.

KSB is a risky proposition, he's great at YAC and a big target but does not resemble a great route runner to me, he also spends too much time on the IR each season due to his refusal to go down when hit, in 5 seasons he's only played 57 games.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on December 29, 2025, 05:44:20 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 29, 2025, 02:39:38 PMProbably. The larger question is how much 2025 SMS was left and used by each team and what happens with new SMS in 2026.

I'm all for players getting more but as I've said, just giving a lot more to a select few doesn't improve the roster.

It does seem that some teams had some 2025 SMS left so there should still be some big spending to come in free agency.

If the alternative is your best players leaving, then it does make your roster better than that alternative.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: theaardvark on December 29, 2025, 06:18:15 PM
With the ratio ensuring that the set number of Nat's and Americans is a given, should there be caps within the caps?  Should the $SMS be broken into 2 caps? One for Nats and one for Americans?

If they did it that way, teams would still pay a disproportionate amount to Nats, but that would be capped.  Bring down the top end of Nat salaries a bit...
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 29, 2025, 06:54:00 PM
Quote from: Jesse on December 29, 2025, 05:44:20 PMIf the alternative is your best players leaving, then it does make your roster better than that alternative.

The SMS cap has no bearing really. If the cap had not gone up, how much do top salaries go up? If the cap had gone up double what it did then do those top players get even more?

If Rourke was a potential free agent does his SMS hit go up to $800K because of the SMS number and the competition to acquire him?

IMO the increase neither keeps a player from leaving or helps keep him. It's just the free market with a given SMS.

Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 29, 2025, 06:58:08 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on December 29, 2025, 06:18:15 PMWith the ratio ensuring that the set number of Nat's and Americans is a given, should there be caps within the caps?  Should the $SMS be broken into 2 caps? One for Nats and one for Americans?

If they did it that way, teams would still pay a disproportionate amount to Nats, but that would be capped.  Bring down the top end of Nat salaries a bit...

Interesting but I'd think the CFLPA would not be in favour of that. Some Canadians are better than some imports and limiting a contract amount based on nationality would be unfair.

That argument was raised about lower Global salaries last year in discussions.

This really falls on team management / owners that will look to " buy " a top talent with contracts in excess of logic.

In the past before SMS we had rich teams paying some players $1M usd because they had no limits.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: TBURGESS on December 29, 2025, 07:55:50 PM
How much did the cap go up this year? Can you point me to doc? Thanks.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 29, 2025, 08:00:57 PM
Quote from: TBURGESS on December 29, 2025, 07:55:50 PMHow much did the cap go up this year? Can you point me to doc? Thanks.

In theory it went up in 2025 by about $400K and that would be carried over as part of the 2026 SMS. I'm not aware of an additional increase above that from last year, but it's possible. IIRC there was a built in increase in each season in the CFLPA agreement.

The large increase last year was due to increased revenue which a separate increase.

There was never any clarity from the league  and the 2025 increase was announced late ( after free agency ) so teams had no where to spend it per se.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: ModAdmin on December 29, 2025, 08:02:58 PM
Quote from: TBURGESS on December 29, 2025, 07:55:50 PMHow much did the cap go up this year? Can you point me to doc? Thanks.
Up by $412,365
https://cflpa.com/cflpa-shares-historic-salary-cap-increase-for-2025-season
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 29, 2025, 09:04:41 PM
Here is what 2026 looks like for the SMS.

The CFL's salary cap for the 2026 season is set to increase due to the league's revenue-sharing model from the new Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), with the base cap expected around
$6.16 million and the total expenditure cap over $6.27 million, driven by 2025 revenue growth, keeping the minimum salary at $70,000 for now but signaling a healthier financial environment.

Key Details for 2026

EDIT: Here is the 2025 cap info again.  If I understand all this there is an additional new increase of about $54K?

That's the difference between the $6.06M and $6.16M. 2025 versus 2026 SMS.

The CFL Salary Management System for 2025
centers on a $6,062,365 salary cap, up significantly due to league revenue growth via the CBA's revenue-sharing model, with rules including spending thresholds, penalties for exceeding the cap (monetary and draft picks), and non-salary bonuses like housing/marketing, all managed under the framework of the 2022 CBA and ongoing discussions with the CFLPA.

Key Components of the 2025 System:
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: TBURGESS on December 29, 2025, 10:00:41 PM
I knew about the 2025 increase, looks like the 2026 is just $54K. Thanks folks.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on December 29, 2025, 11:03:48 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 29, 2025, 09:04:41 PMHere is what 2026 looks like for the SMS.

The CFL's salary cap for the 2026 season is set to increase due to the league's revenue-sharing model from the new Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), with the base cap expected around
$6.16 million and the total expenditure cap over $6.27 million, driven by 2025 revenue growth, keeping the minimum salary at $70,000 for now but signaling a healthier financial environment.

Key Details for 2026

EDIT: Here is the 2025 cap info again.  If I understand all this there is an additional new increase of about $54K?

That's the difference between the $6.06M and $6.16M. 2025 versus 2026 SMS.

The CFL Salary Management System for 2025
centers on a $6,062,365 salary cap, up significantly due to league revenue growth via the CBA's revenue-sharing model, with rules including spending thresholds, penalties for exceeding the cap (monetary and draft picks), and non-salary bonuses like housing/marketing, all managed under the framework of the 2022 CBA and ongoing discussions with the CFLPA.

Key Components of the 2025 System:

Has this been mentioned anywhere other than Google AI?

I expect a cap increase, but I haven't heard of one yet.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: gobombersgo on December 29, 2025, 11:12:28 PM
Quote from: Jesse on December 29, 2025, 11:03:48 PMHas this been mentioned anywhere other than Google AI?

I expect a cap increase, but I haven't heard of one yet.

Only thing I read was the CFLPA will be inforcing the Jan 15th deadline to receive financial documents from the league.

We will hear about any SMS increase after the PA reviews the financials.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 29, 2025, 11:35:08 PM
Quote from: Jesse on December 29, 2025, 11:03:48 PMHas this been mentioned anywhere other than Google AI?

I expect a cap increase, but I haven't heard of one yet.

That's all I've heard. There is an annual increase as part of the CFLPA agreement that was usually in the $55K. Each increase is carried forward since it's and increase and not a one time payment.

The revenue sharing that we had for 2025 was a subset done as a calculation and the 1st time we've had that happen.

So yes, there could be another created in 2026 due to revenue sharing although I think that isn't not a calculation done every season.

However reading the post above mine, the league has to inform the teams by January 15th to confirm any new increase. That would mean something related to revenue sharing.

If there is another large increase based on that, I hope they have a better plan.

My position was to add additional players to the roster.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 30, 2025, 12:09:52 AM
Quote from: gobombersgo on December 29, 2025, 11:12:28 PMOnly thing I read was the CFLPA will be inforcing the Jan 15th deadline to receive financial documents from the league.

We will hear about any SMS increase after the PA reviews the financials.

Watched an interview with Brett Lauther in the summer, he is the CFLPA rep for the Riders, he mentioned the CFL has not been upfront or forthcoming in releasing financial information or money to the PA.  It appears the league is taking a hostile approach to a cooperative effort. Cue the appointment of Stewart Johnston as a soulless sycophant of greed.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 30, 2025, 10:18:44 AM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 29, 2025, 06:54:00 PMIMO the increase neither keeps a player from leaving or helps keep him. It's just the free market with a given SMS.

Every increase in SMS does allow us to keep more players.  Rourke even hinted it himself: top-3 starting CFL QB salary is now enough to compete with perennial-PR job (maybe with a couple of dresses -- see: Strev) in the NFL.  Unless a QB has a strong chance of starting (or dressing for years as bonafide #2), they'll look long and hard at earning $800k total in the CFL.

Every $10 or $40k+ extra a mid/high-range player gets may dissuade them from retirement for a year.

Take the example to the extreme: what if the CFL SMS was the same as the NFL?  Then we'd lose no players at all, and players would play until they are bad or injured.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 30, 2025, 10:22:43 AM
Quote from: theaardvark on December 29, 2025, 06:18:15 PMWith the ratio ensuring that the set number of Nat's and Americans is a given, should there be caps within the caps?  Should the $SMS be broken into 2 caps? One for Nats and one for Americans?

I say no, because part of the fun of the CFL is to see how the GMs work the SMS and the ratio.  It's the flexibility that makes things interesting.  It allows 2025 SSK to have that crazy cheap mega-NAT O setup and win the cup.  They got creative and did a Moneyball and hit the jackpot.  Couldn't do that if the NAT/IMP caps were separately set in stone.

It's like F1: before caps or engine freezes or decreasing the aero modification zone sizes things were a lot more interesting inter-team because there were a lot more variables for teams to play with.  That allows people to get really creative.  Like the 4-front-wheeled 80's constructor.

Quote from: theaardvark on December 29, 2025, 06:18:15 PMIf they did it that way, teams would still pay a disproportionate amount to Nats, but that would be capped.  Bring down the top end of Nat salaries a bit...

Not necessarily.  It could just as easily result in the top NATs making even more, and teams filling the NAT cap with ELCs.  That would effectively end the career of the middling NATs.  And the product would suffer IMHO.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 30, 2025, 10:26:22 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 29, 2025, 05:17:30 PMKSB is a risky proposition, he's great at YAC and a big target but does not resemble a great route runner to me, he also spends too much time on the IR each season due to his refusal to go down when hit, in 5 seasons he's only played 57 games.

KSB was hot garbage after his injury in '25.  And, a bit like McInnis, D's are starting to figure out their limited route options, and cut off their short game / hot outlet role.

KSB barely saw the field in '25.  Not sure he'll realize any dreams of big FA this time 'round.  He should sign on a 1 year to prove himself again.

That said, if he was super cheap I'd take him as the bruiser middle short game guy that we desperately need.  But I'm pretty sure we don't need the ratio help, so it's probably not worth the $ vs an IMP.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 30, 2025, 01:27:23 PM
Quote from: Tecno on December 30, 2025, 10:18:44 AMEvery increase in SMS does allow us to keep more players.  Rourke even hinted it himself: top-3 starting CFL QB salary is now enough to compete with perennial-PR job (maybe with a couple of dresses -- see: Strev) in the NFL.  Unless a QB has a strong chance of starting (or dressing for years as bonafide #2), they'll look long and hard at earning $800k total in the CFL.

Every $10 or $40k+ extra a mid/high-range player gets may dissuade them from retirement for a year.

Take the example to the extreme: what if the CFL SMS was the same as the NFL?  Then we'd lose no players at all, and players would play until they are bad or injured.


Spending before and after SMS limits always saw players come and go. We'll see that this year as well. A player's salary at a fixed point in time is no different than us non professional sports people. At some point we decide its time to retire. More money is not always the driving force.

Rourke suggesting higher SMS might make a player like him not consider an NFL PR for example. I call BS. The NFL salaries go up every season as well. A roster spot on any AR pays more than the very top of CFL salaries. Add in the dream of the NFL which is not just money but playing the game you played in college and playing in your home country.

Rourke is only in the CFL because NFL teams choose to not add him to a roster.

I think you're grasping for straws.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on December 30, 2025, 01:30:54 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 30, 2025, 12:09:52 AMWatched an interview with Brett Lauther in the summer, he is the CFLPA rep for the Riders, he mentioned the CFL has not been upfront or forthcoming in releasing financial information or money to the PA.  It appears the league is taking a hostile approach to a cooperative effort. Cue the appointment of Stewart Johnston as a soulless sycophant of greed.

When the cap increase was released last year and no one knew what was happening, Justin Dunk reported that the financials were so delayed by the league that this increase was based on revenue from the 2021 or 2022 season. That's how far behind they are.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on December 31, 2025, 06:06:42 AM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 30, 2025, 01:27:23 PMRourke is only in the CFL because NFL teams choose to not add him to a roster.

I think you're grasping for straws.

Except Rourke actually spoke to it, around the time he was coming back.

I think it's well known that Rourke could have had more tryouts and PR spots in the NFL had he wanted them.  He hadn't exhausted every possibility when he returned.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 31, 2025, 01:28:28 PM
Quote from: Tecno on December 31, 2025, 06:06:42 AMExcept Rourke actually spoke to it, around the time he was coming back.

I think it's well known that Rourke could have had more tryouts and PR spots in the NFL had he wanted them.  He hadn't exhausted every possibility when he returned.


Rourke got his big new contract in 2024 before the large 2025 SMS increase. It had nothing to do with SMS increasing than the Lions willing to increase his contract at the expense of elsewhere on the roster.  Noting that the Lions finished 3rd in 2024.

Every season teams will decide how to spend their SMS which includes trying to out bid other teams to retain players. In some cases they will choose to let players walk when that happens. Some players will not be offered new contracts as teams choose to go younger as players move up the depth chart.

The CFL cannot compete with the NFL with salaries.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: blue_gold_84 on December 31, 2025, 04:29:45 PM
Quote from: Tecno on December 31, 2025, 06:06:42 AMExcept Rourke actually spoke to it, around the time he was coming back.

I think it's well known that Rourke could have had more tryouts and PR spots in the NFL had he wanted them. He hadn't exhausted every possibility when he returned.

I don't know about that. He had workouts with a dozen NFL teams prior to the 2023 season. He then signed a three-year contract with the Jaguars, which didn't even last a year. He then floated around on waivers with the Patriots, Giants, and Falcons until he returned to the CFL.

I think the writing was on the wall for him after his release from the Falcons.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 31, 2025, 04:33:50 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 31, 2025, 01:28:28 PMRourke got his big new contract in 2024 before the large 2025 SMS increase. It had nothing to do with SMS increasing than the Lions willing to increase his contract at the expense of elsewhere on the roster.  Noting that the Lions finished 3rd in 2024.

Every season teams will decide how to spend their SMS which includes trying to out bid other teams to retain players. In some cases they will choose to let players walk when that happens. Some players will not be offered new contracts as teams choose to go younger as players move up the depth chart.

The CFL cannot compete with the NFL with salaries.

As to the timeline of the SMS increase, was there any mention of marketing money prior to Doman Re-signing Rourke for $824k/season? Seems like marketing money was the joker card the owners threw into the deck after the cards were dealt to excuse any over-spending they wished to indulge in. Instead of punishing Doman according to the SMS rules, they gave him a slap on the back. If it was a planned process I think it would have been discussed in the off-season and brought forward as a proposal.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on December 31, 2025, 06:32:37 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 31, 2025, 04:33:50 PMAs to the timeline of the SMS increase, was there any mention of marketing money prior to Doman Re-signing Rourke for $824k/season? Seems like marketing money was the joker card the owners threw into the deck after the cards were dealt to excuse any over-spending they wished to indulge in. Instead of punishing Doman according to the SMS rules, they gave him a slap on the back. If it was a planned process I think it would have been discussed in the off-season and brought forward as a proposal.

IIRC there was marketing money prior to Rourke returning. How much and the rules behind the concept were not clear. It's still not clear. There has to be a limit otherwise there is no SMS. Geez. How much would the Lions been over in 2024 if they hadn't shifted some spend into MM? It's not like they just missed the mark.

Doman should have suffered more consequences but it it what it is.

Either way the 2024 SMS and 2025 SMS spend for Rourke is excessive. Yes another team may have been willing to pay that but it's still excessive.

SMS is spent across an entire roster and whatever is spent somewhere is not spent elsewhere.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 01, 2026, 09:37:39 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 31, 2025, 04:33:50 PMAs to the timeline of the SMS increase, was there any mention of marketing money prior to Doman Re-signing Rourke for $824k/season?

No.  MMM was literally never mentioned on this forum until those Rourke/Betts shenanigans.  As far as us fans were concerned, it didn't exist.

Sure, MM existed before that moment, but it was all kept entirely reasonable, like giving your QB $20-$50k MM for appearances.  No one would ever bat an eye about that.

It's when BC clearly used it to over pay Rourke, off the SMS, by at least $150k, that everyone suddenly knew what MM was.

The honor system only works if everybody honors it.  Now it's a free for all (has anyone lowered Rourke's MMM yet?), and as such we should be paying Zach & Brady with $200k MMM too.  Play their game until the league finally puts a stop to it.

Oh wait... Johnston too busy moving goal posts and goal lines.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 01, 2026, 05:34:14 PM
Quote from: Tecno on January 01, 2026, 09:37:39 AMNo.  MMM was literally never mentioned on this forum until those Rourke/Betts shenanigans.  As far as us fans were concerned, it didn't exist.

Sure, MM existed before that moment, but it was all kept entirely reasonable, like giving your QB $20-$50k MM for appearances.  No one would ever bat an eye about that.

It's when BC clearly used it to over pay Rourke, off the SMS, by at least $150k, that everyone suddenly knew what MM was.

The honor system only works if everybody honors it.  Now it's a free for all (has anyone lowered Rourke's MMM yet?), and as such we should be paying Zach & Brady with $200k MMM too.  Play their game until the league finally puts a stop to it.

Oh wait... Johnston too busy moving goal posts and goal lines.

That's what I thought, they found a small clause in the SMS, distorted it's purpose, and exploited the hell out of it. You're right, this may be the year the Lions finally turn the tide and kick the Bombers butts, Walters should be using the same crooked accounting until the league cracks down on these exemptions.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on January 01, 2026, 10:45:04 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 01, 2026, 05:34:14 PMThat's what I thought, they found a small clause in the SMS, distorted it's purpose, and exploited the hell out of it. You're right, this may be the year the Lions finally turn the tide and kick the Bombers butts, Walters should be using the same crooked accounting until the league cracks down on these exemptions.

It's not a small, hidden clause, lol.

It was added in the latest CBA so players couldd get paid for off field appearances.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 01, 2026, 10:55:12 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 01, 2026, 10:45:04 PMIt's not a small, hidden clause, lol.

It was added in the latest CBA so players couldd get paid for off field appearances.

Point is the Lions used it as a loophole to subvert the salary cap and exploited it well beyond it's original purpose. 

Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on January 01, 2026, 10:59:34 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 01, 2026, 10:55:12 PMPoint is the Lions used it as a loophole to subvert the salary cap and exploited it well beyond it's original purpose. 



It's not a loophole though. It's part of the contract that the union fought for.

We don't have contract information (yet), so we don't know how much each team spends.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 02, 2026, 12:10:24 AM
Quote from: Jesse on January 01, 2026, 10:59:34 PMIt's not a loophole though. It's part of the contract that the union fought for.

We don't have contract information (yet), so we don't know how much each team spends.

We know the Lions are paying Rourke $200k to participate in drivel like this.


Chris Kolankowski probably earns a couple of thousand for visiting a Northern reserve.


Notice Milt and O'Shea were also there, pretty sure this level of participation influences his opinion of his players.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: TBURGESS on January 02, 2026, 12:37:58 AM
The Lions lawyers looked at the contract, found the marketing money had no limits on it, and used it to bring in a big time player that they wouldn't have been able to afford otherwise. 

That's good lawyering right there.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 02, 2026, 08:54:26 AM
Quote from: TBURGESS on January 02, 2026, 12:37:58 AMThe Lions lawyers looked at the contract, found the marketing money had no limits on it, and used it to bring in a big time player that they wouldn't have been able to afford otherwise.

That's good lawyering right there.

It is.  But it still doesn't mean they aren't d.bags.  Instead of exploiting it in an outrageous manner they could have notified the CFL that this "bug" existed.

I'm a programmer/hacker, if I find a huge zero day bug in Windows, should I exploit it to steal everyone's crypto wallets?  Or do I report it through the proper CVE channels?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 02, 2026, 08:56:14 AM
Quote from: Jesse on January 01, 2026, 10:59:34 PMWe don't have contract information (yet), so we don't know how much each team spends.

Not this again!  You said the exact same thing this time last year.  We don't need to wait for '25 numbers, we already know BC was crooked by going $350k over SMS last season -- and that's EXCLUDING the MMM.

The are a dirty team, and I don't know what you gain by defending them (again).  They're probably MMM'ing the heck out of everyone now: Hatcher, McInnis, etc.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 02, 2026, 08:57:12 AM
Quote from: Jesse on January 01, 2026, 10:59:34 PMIt's not a loophole though. It's part of the contract that the union fought for.

The spirit of the MMM clause was to get players who do more publicity a little more compensation.  It was never intended to be a way to bypass the SMS and pay QB's $850k.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 02, 2026, 08:59:09 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 01, 2026, 10:55:12 PMPoint is the Lions used it as a loophole to subvert the salary cap and exploited it well beyond it's original purpose.

It's the Braun diffuser from F1 15 years ago.  They thought of it first, and they felt like exploiting the loophole (won Braun a championship with a substandard ex-Honda chassis/engine).

And a loophole it indeed is... Not the MMM itself, but using it to the tune of $200k per player.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 02, 2026, 09:17:11 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 02, 2026, 12:10:24 AMWe know the Lions are paying Rourke $200k to participate in drivel like this.

That's some pretty funny stuff, though.  Too bad they didn't find some of my comments to read.

Hmm, 738 views.  Let's say he earned $25k of his $200k MMM for that video.  That means the Lions spent $34 per view on that video.  Seems like a lot, considering nearly every viewer will either be a BC STH already, or an other-city CFL fan who won't be spending money in BC Place anytime soon.

Gaaaaaaaaaaaapppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp.  Kid Oakville
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on January 02, 2026, 11:59:49 AM
Any news on Tre Ford and his $100K bonus due January 1st?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 02, 2026, 01:42:35 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on January 02, 2026, 11:59:49 AMAny news on Tre Ford and his $100K bonus due January 1st?

Good question. There may have been a re-negotiation that we haven't heard about yet.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Waffler on January 02, 2026, 02:22:42 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on January 02, 2026, 11:59:49 AMAny news on Tre Ford and his $100K bonus due January 1st?

Last I read it was a 110k bonus for Feb 1.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 02, 2026, 03:02:37 PM
Quote from: Waffler on January 02, 2026, 02:22:42 PMLast I read it was a 110k bonus for Feb 1.

Ah. That changes the situation for the moment. Regardless of how that works out I don't see Ford as an Elk in 2026. Where he ends up or under what kind of contract is up in the air.

Ultimately he needs a new chance elsewhere. Re-negotiating to stay in Edmonton would leave a bad taste for both sides.

Just my view though.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: TBURGESS on January 02, 2026, 03:15:10 PM
Quote from: Tecno on January 02, 2026, 08:54:26 AMIt is.  But it still doesn't mean they aren't d.bags.  Instead of exploiting it in an outrageous manner they could have notified the CFL that this "bug" existed.

I'm a programmer/hacker, if I find a huge zero day bug in Windows, should I exploit it to steal everyone's crypto wallets?  Or do I report it through the proper CVE channels?

I was a programmer... Mostly Assembler, Cobol & Rexx. I hacked folks userid's and passwords back in high school in the 70's to get more processing time. So I see it differently. Exploiting what's in a contract that anyone who is smart enough to find is just using what's provided to everyone with a working brain. 
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Waffler on January 02, 2026, 03:26:07 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 02, 2026, 03:02:37 PMRegardless of how that works out I don't see Ford as an Elk in 2026.
I feel like they are letting him twist in the wind. Unless they feel a trade is still possible, they should give his release already. Tampering period is also Feb 1. If they want Ford to get a feel what other teams would pay and renegotiate from there it would be too late.  It just seems like a release is coming sooner or later. Take the high road, do it now and give him some time to find a job.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 02, 2026, 04:49:40 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 02, 2026, 03:02:37 PMAh. That changes the situation for the moment. Regardless of how that works out I don't see Ford as an Elk in 2026. Where he ends up or under what kind of contract is up in the air.

Ultimately he needs a new chance elsewhere. Re-negotiating to stay in Edmonton would leave a bad taste for both sides.

Just my view though.

I'd have no problem with Ford as a backup QB, he's an extremely talented athlete who has the potential to be great.  The problem is with his current salary, it should be commensurate with his results, let's use Matthew Shiltz salary as a measuring stick.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: BBRT on January 02, 2026, 05:31:54 PM
Quote from: TBURGESS on January 02, 2026, 03:15:10 PMI was a programmer... Mostly Assembler, Cobol & Rexx. I hacked folks userid's and passwords back in high school in the 70's to get more processing time. So I see it differently. Exploiting what's in a contract that anyone who is smart enough to find is just using what's provided to everyone with a working brain.

"Cobol and Assembler"??? you and I might be the only two folks that know these tools! I go back even further - Fortran!!! I even remember how to do "Case Statements" Man we are getting up there! My first degree was in Electrical Engineering and I got to work on the very first IBM mainframe in the good ol Green Machine!!
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on January 02, 2026, 05:34:42 PM
Quote from: Tecno on January 02, 2026, 08:56:14 AMNot this again!  You said the exact same thing this time last year.  We don't need to wait for '25 numbers, we already know BC was crooked by going $350k over SMS last season -- and that's EXCLUDING the MMM.

The are a dirty team, and I don't know what you gain by defending them (again).  They're probably MMM'ing the heck out of everyone now: Hatcher, McInnis, etc.


I'm not talking about salary cap adherence. I mean, we don't know how much marketing money teams spend in total on all their players.

I'm certainly not defending BC, just complaining about lack of transparency from the CFL and it's kinda pointless to discuss certain things when we aren't privy to 95% of the info.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: theaardvark on January 02, 2026, 05:53:52 PM
Quote from: BBRT on January 02, 2026, 05:31:54 PM"Cobol and Assembler"??? you and I might be the only two folks that know these tools! I go back even further - Fortran!!! I even remember how to do "Case Statements" Man we are getting up there! My first degree was in Electrical Engineering and I got to work on the very first IBM mainframe in the good ol Green Machine!!

Cut my teeth on Fortran on cards.

Heathkit H8 we built and programmed through the keypad until we got our smart terminal.

Timex/Sinclair, TRS80, PET 2001...  Basic, assembler, machine code...

Pascal and COBOL I could speak pidgin if needed in a pinch.

And zero of it remembered today, because I'm old as heck.

And today?

CHAT GPT - write me a programme


Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 02, 2026, 06:54:08 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 02, 2026, 04:49:40 PMI'd have no problem with Ford as a backup QB, he's an extremely talented athlete who has the potential to be great.  The problem is with his current salary, it should be commensurate with his results, let's use Matthew Shiltz salary as a measuring stick.

I agree it's all about the SMS level. I'd take him as a # 2 QB for the right price. Shiltz just retired didn't he?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: TBURGESS on January 02, 2026, 07:47:46 PM
Fortran? Of course, I know Fortran and Pascal, C, C++, Basic, and even RPG in a pinch. 

The TRS80 was known as my Trash 80. 

My first job was on an IBM 360. 

Yes sir... I am older than dirt. 
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 02, 2026, 08:10:14 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 02, 2026, 06:54:08 PMI agree it's all about the SMS level. I'd take him as a # 2 QB for the right price. Shiltz just retired didn't he?

Nobody really cares, Shiltz is the perfect example of a QB given multiple opportunities to progress to becoming a starter and failing to do so, couldn't even follow the Fajardo path.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Horseman on January 02, 2026, 08:52:24 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 02, 2026, 03:02:37 PMAh. That changes the situation for the moment. Regardless of how that works out I don't see Ford as an Elk in 2026. Where he ends up or under what kind of contract is up in the air.

Ultimately he needs a new chance elsewhere. Re-negotiating to stay in Edmonton would leave a bad taste for both sides.

Just my view though.

I wouldn't mind seeing him in Blue as our #2, with a chance to play more if Zach gets injured.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: M.O.A.B. on January 03, 2026, 01:30:14 PM
Quote from: TBURGESS on January 02, 2026, 07:47:46 PMFortran? Of course, I know Fortran and Pascal, C, C++, Basic, and even RPG in a pinch.

The TRS80 was known as my Trash 80.

My first job was on an IBM 360.

Yes sir... I am older than dirt.

RPG here. Started in Y2K. Still working as RPG programmer.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: theaardvark on January 03, 2026, 07:07:02 PM
Quote from: M.O.A.B. on January 03, 2026, 01:30:14 PMRPG here. Started in Y2K. Still working as RPG programmer.

Ahhh... Y2K.

So many systems used that 2 digit year code, especially when using fixed length ASCII data flies.  I did get asked by a few companies to help, thanks to my knowledge of almost extinct languages, to help out with updating the files.

The company I worked for at the time (as a salesman, but who could program circles around the technical staff, they were efficient but had no imagination or concept of how the users actually used the systems) used a 256 byte fixed length ASCII file setup for complete patient data (Name, address, etc) and thought they were smart in using a 6 digit dates for last visit, etc, to conserve data (using 8" floppies in CPM).  They used 8 digit DOB off the start, too many 1890's clients (anyone over 80 back then), so we were fine on that one, but there were a few other dates, with calls from many different subprograms.

Since we now had 20MB hard drives and tape backups, we could splurge for the extra few digits in the data file.

I think I added more new features to the system as a salesman than the development team ever did.  I'd ask for a customizable label routine and they'd say it couldn't be easily done and would mean every site would have to have thier own executables.  I wrote a label printing routine that gave the client 10 different labels formats and printer selections through unique to site external data files in one evening, left them the code and file format printouts on their conference desk like a shoemakers elf.

They should have given me a big raise and put me in charge of the tech group.  Instead, I got recruited away for double the pay a few weeks later, and they got swallowed up by another company.


     
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 04, 2026, 07:18:12 AM
Quote from: Jesse on January 02, 2026, 05:34:42 PMI'm not talking about salary cap adherence. I mean, we don't know how much marketing money teams spend in total on all their players.

I thought those MMM numbers do come out eventually.  Someone posted (here) all the MMM numbers for WFC players a couple of/few months back.  I'm assuming they didn't just pull those numbers out of their butt?

Besides, BC didn't even hide the MMM number they were giving Rourke and Betts when they returned.

The key is finding that info... it would sure be nice if the CFL could compile it and post it to their site.  Or just leak it every year to 3down.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 04, 2026, 07:20:00 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 02, 2026, 04:49:40 PMI'd have no problem with Ford as a backup QB, he's an extremely talented athlete who has the potential to be great.

So what's Ford's problem then?  I find it very strange.  I think he's smarter than VAJ, and probably/maybe Cody.  Tyrrel was certainly pretty smart -- so too should be his identical twin.

If VAJ can pick up reading a D, why can't Ford?  It's bizarre.  Maybe he just needs top tier coaching?  Didn't he have a year or 2 with Jarious?  Shouldn't that have been "good enough"?

Weird.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 04, 2026, 02:29:25 PM
Quote from: Tecno on January 04, 2026, 07:20:00 AMSo what's Ford's problem then?  I find it very strange.  I think he's smarter than VAJ, and probably/maybe Cody.  Tyrrel was certainly pretty smart -- so too should be his identical twin.

If VAJ can pick up reading a D, why can't Ford?  It's bizarre.  Maybe he just needs top tier coaching?  Didn't he have a year or 2 with Jarious?  Shouldn't that have been "good enough"?

Weird.

It's never that easy a question to answer. The skill of the players on offence and the OC play calling come into play. Their defence improved during 2025 but had problems early and still had flaws.

It seemed they were often in catch up mode when the playbook goes out the window.

I think he'd do better on a better team but will he get that chance in 2026 as a starter? Where?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 04, 2026, 03:43:34 PM
Quote from: Tecno on January 04, 2026, 07:20:00 AMSo what's Ford's problem then?  I find it very strange.  I think he's smarter than VAJ, and probably/maybe Cody.  Tyrrel was certainly pretty smart -- so too should be his identical twin.

If VAJ can pick up reading a D, why can't Ford?  It's bizarre.  Maybe he just needs top tier coaching?  Didn't he have a year or 2 with Jarious?  Shouldn't that have been "good enough"?

Weird.

Not sure who said it but someone from the previous Elks previous regime commented Ford does not put in the mental work and relies too much on his athletic ability as that's how he's got by in the past.  Could be why he never received a US scholarship or did all that well in USports, who knows?


Come to think of it, maybe it was Jarious Jackson?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: BBRT on January 04, 2026, 04:50:39 PM
Quote from: TBURGESS on January 02, 2026, 07:47:46 PMFortran? Of course, I know Fortran and Pascal, C, C++, Basic, and even RPG in a pinch.

The TRS80 was known as my Trash 80.

My first job was on an IBM 360.

Yes sir... I am older than dirt.

Older than Dirt?? Dude I am looking at Dirt in my rear view mirror  ;D
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 04, 2026, 07:46:23 PM
The Calgary Stampeders rewarded the CFL's reigning rushing king, Dedrick Mills, by making him the highest-paid American running back.

The five-foot-10, 238-pound RB received a $55,000 signing bonus to ink his two-year extension with the Stamps. He has an $85,000 base salary, $15,000 in housing, $15,000 in marketing, and a $3,000 travel allowance to equal $173,000 in hard money. The 29-year-old also has $23,000 available in statistical, all-star and award incentives, which can take his maximum earnings to $196,500 in 2026. That includes:

    $5,000 for 1,000 rushing yards
    $5,000 for 1,750 rushing and receiving yards
    $3,000 for 750 rushing yards
    $2,000 for 1,500 rushing and receiving yards
    $2,000 for being named a CFL all-star
    $2,000 for being named league MOP
    $1,000 for being named a West Division all-star
    $1,000 for being named team MOP
    $1,000 for 500 rushing yards
    $1,000 for 1,250 rushing and receiving yards

Goes to show how tough import RB's have to scrap for their cash, meanwhile Brady has direct deposit and doesn't have to stand in line at the bank.

Last season was the first one in 4 Mills remained healthy for 18 games carrying the ball 250 times for 1409 yds, I won't be surprised if that remains his high-water mark.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/04/calgary-stampeders-make-dedrick-mills-highest-paid-american-rb-in-cfl/ (https://3downnation.com/2026/01/04/calgary-stampeders-make-dedrick-mills-highest-paid-american-rb-in-cfl/)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on January 04, 2026, 07:49:46 PM
Brady about 100k over the highest paid american, same as last year.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: PloenFan on January 05, 2026, 02:03:35 AM
Quote from: TBURGESS on January 02, 2026, 03:15:10 PMI was a programmer... Mostly Assembler, Cobol & Rexx. I hacked folks userid's and passwords back in high school in the 70's to get more processing time. So I see it differently. Exploiting what's in a contract that anyone who is smart enough to find is just using what's provided to everyone with a working brain.
Work on old school mainframe stuff (COBOL, SAS, JCL) and newer server stuff (JAMS, Visual Studio). Glad to see there other mainframe programmers on this forum !
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 05, 2026, 06:36:03 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 04, 2026, 07:46:23 PMThe Calgary Stampeders rewarded the CFL's reigning rushing king, Dedrick Mills, by making him the highest-paid American running back.

Mills laying in bed at night, wondering "why couldn't I have been born in Canada?".

Surely Oullette will have to make a play for similar money...  Strange, but many/most Riderfans want him to walk if he is anything other than budget (read: similar to last deal).
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 05, 2026, 06:37:24 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 04, 2026, 03:43:34 PMFord does not put in the mental work and relies too much on his athletic ability as that's how he's got by in the past.

So it's mental laziness then.  Well, we can 100% rule him out becoming a Bomber then!  MOS hates laziness more than any other thing.

Maybe Ty was the same way?  But as a DB you can wing it a lot more.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 05, 2026, 06:45:49 AM
SSK (re-)signs Mariner, the IMP REC who looked ok in OTT for a couple of years.

I think it's a good fit for them.  Perfect for their mostly-cheap REC corps.  Decent hands, and can be a home run hitter or an inside bruiser.

I think this hints they are losing Meyer and/or Robustelli, as those would be the players most like Mariner.

SSK will be keeping the rest of the corps cheap now that Emilus got paid, and I think they still want to make a play for Johnson.  Need to keep saving up that $$ for the real priority: D.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 05, 2026, 06:50:22 AM
BLM re-signs in HAM for $100k more than last year.  Still pretty "budget" compared to Zach.

Interesting: only $40k MMM.  HAM not playing the BC cheatin' game.  In fact, I haven't heard of any team paying anywhere near the cheatin' MMM amount BC is for Rourke.  Which is strange, because everyone can use that cheat code now.  I sure wish we'd renog Zach's to move $200k of his SMS to MMM.  Last I heard Zach was only getting $50k MMM, which seems to be pretty normal for (non-BC) QBs.

And the budgety-est QB in the whole league?  T.Harris.  Takes haircuts every year so his team can sign playmakers and win.  Zach??
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on January 05, 2026, 01:25:32 PM
Riders DL Micah Johnson officially retires and will remain in Green and White as he begins the next chapter as the Club's Defensive Line Coach.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/05/micah-johnson-retires-from-playing-in-cfl-accepts-job-as-saskatchewan-roughriders-defensive-line-coach/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: theaardvark on January 05, 2026, 04:01:26 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on January 05, 2026, 01:25:32 PMRiders DL Micah Johnson officially retires and will remain in Green and White as he begins the next chapter as the Club's Defensive Line Coach.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/05/micah-johnson-retires-from-playing-in-cfl-accepts-job-as-saskatchewan-roughriders-defensive-line-coach/

Mica Johnson vs. Jake Thomas.  Which is going to be the better DL coach?

In SSK, both the HC and DC are ex DL (Mace)

In WPR, HC is ex-DB, DC is ex-DB.

Will be an interesting matchup.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: DM83 on January 05, 2026, 04:18:30 PM
Works, word, publisher  still on AOL " you got mail" love Meg Ryan.
Ford and Vag can't read a defence.

I have coached both O and D. Teaching some Hugh schoolers can be done.  But a lot of it is the QB. When all poop happens taking off and running is what has led to the kids success. And it's not even actual running , the threat of running scares the Defence, but escape ability, and breaking down the Defence is the killer.
Pre snap reads and alignment tell the offence what the defence is doing.
Down and distance tendencies by practice week film study tells the defence what is likely to be called.
Identifying slow guys on defence, or punishing weak guys on defence.

Give a QB two reads, and then throw it away, or take off, and run.that all happens in about a second. So it sounds easy. Easier said than done.
Young guys or even relics like Collaros can take off, and run, to make the next amount needed for a first is short. ( dump pass to a back or a crossing pattern by receiver(s).

Enjoy them while you can. Best before dates are approaching, asap.

VAJ has gotten better. He does seem tohave  emotional breakdowns though.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 05, 2026, 05:27:53 PM
Quote from: Tecno on January 05, 2026, 06:36:03 AMMills laying in bed at night, wondering "why couldn't I have been born in Canada?".

Surely Oullette will have to make a play for similar money...  Strange, but many/most Riderfans want him to walk if he is anything other than budget (read: similar to last deal).


Last season Oullettie was the 2nd highest paid RB at:

Hard money: $152,100
Maximum value: $162,500

Last year he actually earned his paycheque after sputtering through his first season in Sask, don't think he'll put his hand out for more.

It will be interesting to see how long Andrew Harris hangs in as a running back coach earning below $100k, restless guy like that you'd think he'd be looking for bigger fish to fry.

Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 05, 2026, 10:09:05 PM
Looks like Dru Brown has a new contract based on transaction activity on CFL.CA. What exactly changed we might hear over the next week or so.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 05, 2026, 10:40:28 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 05, 2026, 10:09:05 PMLooks like Dru Brown has a new contract based on transaction activity on CFL.CA. What exactly changed we might hear over the next week or so.

He wasn't scheduled to be a FA, must be a restructuring.  Not sure they should be paying him more but can't legitimately pay him less if he's the #1 QB.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on January 06, 2026, 02:27:08 AM
Quote from: Jesse on January 04, 2026, 07:49:46 PMBrady about 100k over the highest paid american, same as last year.
That's disturbing. I don't understand why we went so overboard with his salary bump. I m all for guys getting paid what they're worth but Brady isn't worth $100k more than the league rushing leader. Heck Steve Scott would be a fraction of Brady's salary and just as effective and there's tons of Steve Scott's out there looking for a chance to play professional football. Things are way out of whack on this
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: bunker on January 06, 2026, 02:30:47 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 05, 2026, 10:40:28 PMHe wasn't scheduled to be a FA, must be a restructuring.  Not sure they should be paying him more but can't legitimately pay him less if he's the #1 QB.
I'm betting they are paying him less. He didn't earn his salary last year.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 06, 2026, 03:11:43 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 05, 2026, 05:27:53 PMIt will be interesting to see how long Andrew Harris hangs in as a running back coach earning below $100k, restless guy like that you'd think he'd be looking for bigger fish to fry.

Pretty sure $100k is the best AH can expect going forward.  Not the brightest bulb.  That's pretty good for a dim bulb who burnt every bridge in his hometown.

I hope he gets some respect in Regina, though.  I wonder if people thank him for turning Oullette from a loser into a powerhouse, or still spit on him for having kicked their butts in blue for 8 years straight.

I'm still his greatest fan, but man did the "happy ending" rewrite turn out to be crap.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 06, 2026, 03:12:56 AM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 05, 2026, 04:01:26 PMMica Johnson vs. Jake Thomas.  Which is going to be the better DL coach?

They should make a ratio for the coaches cap!   ;D  ;D  ;D

Or how about $50k freebie extra pay outside the cap for every coach who is a NAT?  Extra bonus if they were a player in the CFL.

We'd clean up!
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on January 06, 2026, 10:52:51 AM
Quote from: dd on January 06, 2026, 02:27:08 AMThat's disturbing. I don't understand why we went so overboard with his salary bump. I m all for guys getting paid what they're worth but Brady isn't worth $100k more than the league rushing leader. Heck Steve Scott would be a fraction of Brady's salary and just as effective and there's tons of Steve Scott's out there looking for a chance to play professional football. Things are way out of whack on this

It's mostly just the difference between a high end Canadian starter and the next closest American. And Brady is certainly one to push his salary as high as he can manage. 
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 06, 2026, 05:10:33 PM
D.Alford signs with the Saints. He's the 1st option window player to sign a deal.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 06, 2026, 05:56:51 PM
Quote from: Tecno on January 06, 2026, 03:11:43 AMPretty sure $100k is the best AH can expect going forward.  Not the brightest bulb.  That's pretty good for a dim bulb who burnt every bridge in his hometown.

I hope he gets some respect in Regina, though.  I wonder if people thank him for turning Oullette from a loser into a powerhouse, or still spit on him for having kicked their butts in blue for 8 years straight.

I'm still his greatest fan, but man did the "happy ending" rewrite turn out to be crap.


This is harsh, don't see evidence Harris is a dim bulb just because he didn't have a fairy tale ending in Blue.  As for his past, circumstances come into play and he's made a success of himself, he's street smart, focused and well spoken. He had a bad childhood which can scar people for life, just look at the mess that is Theoren Fleury. Same story for Brady, but fortunately he found support and focus in his teen years and went onto university where he found stability.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Stats Junkie on January 06, 2026, 07:00:50 PM
Jaylon Hutchings signs with Minnesota Vikings
https://x.com/i/status/2008608562050986103 (https://x.com/i/status/2008608562050986103)

Damien Alford signs with New Orleans Saints
https://x.com/i/status/2008607293839912975 (https://x.com/i/status/2008607293839912975)

Dohnte Meyers expected to sign with Cincinnati Bengals
https://x.com/i/status/2008624201230581864 (https://x.com/i/status/2008624201230581864)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Stats Junkie on January 06, 2026, 09:45:45 PM
LB Jacob Roberts (CGY) has signed with the Minnesota Vikings
https://x.com/i/status/2008662906574172375 (https://x.com/i/status/2008662906574172375)

DL Elliott Brown (EDM) has signed with the Arizona Cardinals
https://x.com/i/status/2008641056129339663 (https://x.com/i/status/2008641056129339663)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 06, 2026, 09:57:11 PM
Well that's 5 players that have taken the NFL option so far. The good news is that nothing so far about Vaval. Also haven't heard anything about Wooden.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 06, 2026, 10:15:17 PM
Quote from: Stats Junkie on January 06, 2026, 09:45:45 PMLB Jacob Roberts (CGY) has signed with the Minnesota Vikings
https://x.com/i/status/2008662906574172375 (https://x.com/i/status/2008662906574172375)

DL Elliott Brown (EDM) has signed with the Arizona Cardinals
https://x.com/i/status/2008641056129339663 (https://x.com/i/status/2008641056129339663)

Biggie moves one step closer to starting! He must be considering retirement though, this can't go on forever.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: markf on January 07, 2026, 01:31:18 AM
Seems These three are doing a good job

:The Stampeders' football operations staff for 2026 includes:

• Assistant general manager and director of player personnel Brendan Mahoney
• Director of U.S. scouting Cole Hufnagel
• Director of Canadian scouting and U.S. scout Dwayne Cameron:

I have thought that John Hufnagel seemed to have good contacts in US.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 07, 2026, 08:25:54 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 06, 2026, 10:15:17 PMBiggie moves one step closer to starting! He must be considering retirement though, this can't go on forever.

Biggie was 100% ineffective in the few games he dressed for in 2025.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 07, 2026, 08:26:50 AM
Quote from: Stats Junkie on January 06, 2026, 07:00:50 PMDohnte Meyers expected to sign with Cincinnati Bengals

Are they desperate for RECs or something?  That's a bizarre move.  If true, the dude will probably be back for labor day.  That should make SSK happy.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 07, 2026, 04:27:44 PM
Didn't Meyers get some guaranteed money in his deal. I didn't hear about that for the other players yet. There are still several talented CFL players we haven't heard how things are going.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 07, 2026, 04:30:25 PM
Quote from: Tecno on January 07, 2026, 08:26:50 AMAre they desperate for RECs or something?  That's a bizarre move.  If true, the dude will probably be back for labor day.  That should make SSK happy.

He's better than you think, just ask the Cincinnati Bengals!  :D
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on January 07, 2026, 05:23:47 PM
Quote from: Tecno on January 07, 2026, 08:26:50 AMAre they desperate for RECs or something?  That's a bizarre move.  If true, the dude will probably be back for labor day.  That should make SSK happy.
Your anti Rider bias is showing Techie, he's a pretty decent reciever
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on January 07, 2026, 06:40:53 PM
BC Lions Carter Jr signs with Colts.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/07/b-c-lions-db-robert-carter-jr-signs-nfl-futures-contract-with-indianapolis-colts/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: markf on January 07, 2026, 11:26:21 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on January 07, 2026, 06:40:53 PMBC Lions Carter Jr signs with Colts.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/07/b-c-lions-db-robert-carter-jr-signs-nfl-futures-contract-with-indianapolis-colts/

His athleticism is top level. Bit small, but there are other small defensive backs  playing there.

That interception he made would have wowed them.

I like seeing all these guys get a chance to make a lot of money.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 08, 2026, 01:16:18 AM
Quote from: Ridermania on January 07, 2026, 06:40:53 PMBC Lions Carter Jr signs with Colts.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/07/b-c-lions-db-robert-carter-jr-signs-nfl-futures-contract-with-indianapolis-colts/

He'll be baaaaack.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 08, 2026, 01:54:14 AM
Quote from: dd on January 07, 2026, 05:23:47 PMYour anti Rider bias is showing Techie, he's a pretty decent reciever

I never hide my Rider bias.  But your statement proved my point: "pretty decent".  Why is "pretty decent" getting a spot on an NFL team?  I thought the NFL only sniped the best of the best of the best (... and, uh, Strevie).

So I thought, maybe Meyers is 6'2, NFL loves giants... nope, only 5'10.

Sometimes I really don't understand the NFL.  BC's Carter going down, that makes sense.  Zylstra & Walker when they went, that made sense.  Singleton, makes sense.

There are about 15-20 RECs in the CFL I'd take before Meyers.  So why him?  The only other thing I can think of is he's still super young (25).
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 08, 2026, 07:00:59 PM
Quote from: Tecno on January 08, 2026, 01:54:14 AMI never hide my Rider bias.  But your statement proved my point: "pretty decent".  Why is "pretty decent" getting a spot on an NFL team?  I thought the NFL only sniped the best of the best of the best (... and, uh, Strevie).

So I thought, maybe Meyers is 6'2, NFL loves giants... nope, only 5'10.

Sometimes I really don't understand the NFL.  BC's Carter going down, that makes sense.  Zylstra & Walker when they went, that made sense.  Singleton, makes sense.

There are about 15-20 RECs in the CFL I'd take before Meyers.  So why him?  The only other thing I can think of is he's still super young (25).


Riderfans discuss Meyers as if he's a homerun hitter, can't say I noticed him more than a few times, but than Trevor Harris rarely takes the time to throw the deep ball.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 08, 2026, 07:43:31 PM
RedBlacks hire Reinbold as STC as well as Pete Costanza as receiver coach, hard to understand why no one  willing to make Costanza an OC, must come down to personality.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/08/ottawa-redblacks-hire-jeff-reinebold-finalize-2026-coaching-staff/ (https://3downnation.com/2026/01/08/ottawa-redblacks-hire-jeff-reinebold-finalize-2026-coaching-staff/)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G-KblLJWIAAUZx1?format=jpg&name=900x900)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 08, 2026, 08:09:09 PM
Argo coaching staff announced, includes newly retired Ka'deem Carey and Jovon Johnson.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G-JyI5cXUAAxqXY?format=jpg&name=4096x4096)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Pete on January 08, 2026, 09:28:35 PM
https://3downnation.com/2026/01/08/hamilton-tiger-cats-release-all-east-division-defender-casey-sayles/
Cmon home!
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 08, 2026, 09:31:37 PM
Quote from: Pete on January 08, 2026, 09:28:35 PMhttps://3downnation.com/2026/01/08/hamilton-tiger-cats-release-all-east-division-defender-casey-sayles/
Cmon home!

Yes I'd be on the phone with his agent immediately and see what his thoughts and asking price will be.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on January 08, 2026, 09:37:55 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 08, 2026, 08:09:09 PMArgo coaching staff announced, includes newly retired Ka'deem Carey and Jovon Johnson.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G-JyI5cXUAAxqXY?format=jpg&name=4096x4096)

Jovon Johnson?!?!?

One of my all time favs.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on January 08, 2026, 10:08:54 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 08, 2026, 09:31:37 PMYes I'd be on the phone with his agent immediately and see what his thoughts and asking price will be.
He'd be a massive upgrade from what we've seen since he moved to the Ticats
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on January 08, 2026, 10:31:36 PM
If we're going to play mostly a 4-3 sure. Otherwise the middle of the defense needs to be Canadian. Like the player though.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: markf on January 08, 2026, 10:33:18 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 08, 2026, 07:43:31 PMRedBlacks hire Reinbold as STC as well as Pete Costanza as receiver coach, hard to understand why no one  willing to make Costanza an OC, must come down to personality.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/08/ottawa-redblacks-hire-jeff-reinebold-finalize-2026-coaching-staff/ (https://3downnation.com/2026/01/08/ottawa-redblacks-hire-jeff-reinebold-finalize-2026-coaching-staff/)

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G-KblLJWIAAUZx1?format=jpg&name=900x900)

I like Reinbold being back in the CFL....  He's a stalwart of the league.

Re 3/4. V   4/3.  .... Do they fit the scheme to the players, or do they get the players that can fit the the
Scheme?

It seemed to me that they do what's best with the best players they have, so if best players would be four  d linemen they would do that.

I hope. 

No idea though really
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Stats Junkie on January 08, 2026, 10:43:24 PM
Hamilton Tiger-Cats have released Isaiah Wooden & Nik Constantinou so that they can pursue NFL opportunities.

https://x.com/i/status/2009385232584040822 (https://x.com/i/status/2009385232584040822)

Constantinou expected to sign with Cleveland Browns.

Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 09, 2026, 09:29:31 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 08, 2026, 08:09:09 PMArgo coaching staff announced

Wasn't Picard a longtime OL in the CFL?  With SSK?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on January 09, 2026, 10:49:26 AM
Quote from: Tecno on January 09, 2026, 09:29:31 AMWasn't Picard a longtime OL in the CFL?  With SSK?


Started and ended his career here in Winnipeg. The middle years in TO and Sask.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 09, 2026, 01:00:54 PM
Quote from: Stats Junkie on January 08, 2026, 10:43:24 PMHamilton Tiger-Cats have released Isaiah Wooden & Nik Constantinou so that they can pursue NFL opportunities.

https://x.com/i/status/2009385232584040822 (https://x.com/i/status/2009385232584040822)

Constantinou expected to sign with Cleveland Browns.



That might create a problem re=signing Sheehan or cost us more to keep him?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 09, 2026, 05:38:36 PM
Sask. announces their coaching staff, Mace gives up the job of DC to Josh Bell.

Head coach — Corey Mace
Offensive coordinator — Marc Mueller
Defensive coordinator — Josh Bell
Special teams coordinator — Kent Maugeri
Offensive line coach — Edwin Harrison
Receivers coach — Marquay McDaniel
Running backs coach — Andrew Harris
Offensive assistant — Josh Donnelly
Run game coordinator and linebackers coach — Travis Brown
Defensive line coach — Micah Johnson
Defensive backs coach — Jordan Linnen
Special teams assistant — Jeff Stusek

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/09/saskatchewan-roughriders-name-josh-bell-defensive-coordinator-finalize-2026-coaching-staff/ (https://3downnation.com/2026/01/09/saskatchewan-roughriders-name-josh-bell-defensive-coordinator-finalize-2026-coaching-staff/)



Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 09, 2026, 05:46:35 PM
Ti-Cats cut Casey Sayles a couple of days ago, did not see any mention on here.

Hamilton Tiger-Cats release All-East Division defender Casey Sayles (//http://)

Wonder who or what caused the Ti-Cats to drop him? He'd be a solid addition to the Bomber D-line but would likely cost them $200k+.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 09, 2026, 07:01:22 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 09, 2026, 05:46:35 PMTi-Cats cut Casey Sayles a couple of days ago, did not see any mention on here.

Hamilton Tiger-Cats release All-East Division defender Casey Sayles (//http://)

Wonder who or what caused the Ti-Cats to drop him? He'd be a solid addition to the Bomber D-line but would likely cost them $200k+.

It was mentioned and he might have been an SMS casualty?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 09, 2026, 07:59:47 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 09, 2026, 07:01:22 PMIt was mentioned and he might have been an SMS casualty?

Likely trying to cut cost to pump up their offence, currently they have 4 Natls. and 9 Import D-linemen competing for jobs, including 3 ex Bombers. Julian Howsare will be a FA if not re-signed.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 10, 2026, 11:36:34 AM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 09, 2026, 01:00:54 PMThat might create a problem re=signing Sheehan or cost us more to keep him?

Maybe.  Maybe meh.  The Ozzie punters are kinda everywhere now.  And if we get in a bidding war with, say, HAM, we're probably talking an extra $10-$15k only... do we really care?

With Ted gone, I think HAM will cease to try to be Bombers Redux.  And rightly so: you want to try to emulate the 6th best CFL team from 2025?

Plus, their dude will probably be back, as 90% of CFL punters do...
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: VictorRomano on January 10, 2026, 02:22:33 PM
Argos have hired former Bomber and CFL All Star Jovon Johnson as DB Coach.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 10, 2026, 02:32:13 PM
Quote from: Tecno on January 10, 2026, 11:36:34 AMMaybe.  Maybe meh.  The Ozzie punters are kinda everywhere now.  And if we get in a bidding war with, say, HAM, we're probably talking an extra $10-$15k only... do we really care?

With Ted gone, I think HAM will cease to try to be Bombers Redux.  And rightly so: you want to try to emulate the 6th best CFL team from 2025?

Plus, their dude will probably be back, as 90% of CFL punters do...


Sure. It comes down to a proven situation versus unproven and any impact to SMS. I don't think this would be any sort of massive bidding war but we could see him look into the tampering window period before agreeing to a new contract.

At the moment we only have 2 global players on our roster. If there is any expectation that Munier Bailey will be on the AR then sticking with a global punter comes at the cost of an extra Canadian.

I'm not saying that is a bad situation but it overlaps decisions for roster spots. Last year for the most part we only had 1 global on the AR barring injuries to Canadian choices.

In general my preference is to only have 1 global on the AR and punter seems to be the most often and best used choice.

That's a lot to unpack. I'm ok with losing Sheehan and signing a rookie global but that comes with some risk. If we're going with a rookie kicker than I'd rather find a Canadian.

I guess the 1st question is does Munier-Bailey make the AR and what happens downstream on the roster. Overall I support the extra Canadian than 2 global players on the AR.

I laugh at the absurdity of the global draft with 2 rounds and having dedicated roster spots on the AR ( 1 ) and PR spots ( 2 ). Just from a math point of view the 2 we draft may make the PR by default. If we lose Sheehan, we may only have 3 global players by the end of TC and each will make part of the roster.

Re 2025 global draft: 11 of the 18 players drafted were either kickers or punters.  I wonder how many of them might still be available including the punter we drafted?



Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: theaardvark on January 10, 2026, 05:00:29 PM
Quote from: Tecno on January 10, 2026, 11:36:34 AMMaybe.  Maybe meh.  The Ozzie punters are kinda everywhere now.  And if we get in a bidding war with, say, HAM, we're probably talking an extra $10-$15k only... do we really care?

With Ted gone, I think HAM will cease to try to be Bombers Redux.  And rightly so: you want to try to emulate the 6th best CFL team from 2025?

Plus, their dude will probably be back, as 90% of CFL punters do...


HAM still has their GM spot open, I guess in honour of Ted?  Is Sunderland making those calls right now?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on January 12, 2026, 03:54:02 PM
Riders re-sign Cdn DB Tevaughn Campbell.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/12/saskatchewan-roughriders-re-sign-all-cfl-db-tevaughn-campbell/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on January 12, 2026, 06:57:05 PM
Riders extend LB Jameer Thurman thru 2027.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/12/saslatchewan-roughriders-sign-cfl-all-star-lb-jameer-thurman-to-contract-extension-through-2027/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 12, 2026, 07:58:39 PM
Bob Dyce hired as Ti-Cats STC replacing Dennis McKnight who walks the plank.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/12/hamilton-tiger-cats-hire-former-redblacks-head-coach-bob-dyce-as-special-teams-coordinator/ (https://3downnation.com/2026/01/12/hamilton-tiger-cats-hire-former-redblacks-head-coach-bob-dyce-as-special-teams-coordinator/)

Hamilton's coaching staff:

Scott Milanovich – Head Coach & Offensive Coordinator
Bob Dyce* – Special Teams Coordinator & Assistant Head Coach
Brent Monson – Defensive Coordinator
James Tuck – Co-Special Teams Coordinator
Jarryd Baines – Quarterbacks Coach
Brendan Walsh – Offensive Line Coach
Naaman Roosevelt – Receivers Coach
Myer Spitulnik – Running Backs & Offensive Quality Control Coach
Casey Creehan – Defensive Line Coach
Brandon Isaac – Defensive Backs Coach
Elijah Sandweiss – Linebackers & Assistant Special Teams Coach

Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on January 12, 2026, 10:27:35 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on January 12, 2026, 03:54:02 PMRiders re-sign Cdn DB Tevaughn Campbell.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/12/saskatchewan-roughriders-re-sign-all-cfl-db-tevaughn-campbell/
Great signing by the Riders, wonder if they paid 'Ford' $$ or did he come at a reasonabe price tag.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on January 13, 2026, 01:44:10 PM
Tiger Cats release CND LB Devin Veresuk for NFL try-out.

https://www.cfl.ca/2026/01/12/ticats-release-devin-veresuk-for-nfl-opportunity/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 13, 2026, 05:27:20 PM
Casey Sayles signs a 2 year deal with BC.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/13/casey-sayles-to-sign-with-b-c-lions-following-release-from-tiger-cats/ (https://3downnation.com/2026/01/13/casey-sayles-to-sign-with-b-c-lions-following-release-from-tiger-cats/)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: VictorRomano on January 13, 2026, 05:34:29 PM
LB Adarous Pickett released by Redblacks.  Might we have any interest?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 13, 2026, 05:34:32 PM
Ottawa Redblacks grant all-star Adarius Pickett early release prior to FA.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/13/ottawa-redblacks-grant-all-star-adarius-pickett-early-release/ (https://3downnation.com/2026/01/13/ottawa-redblacks-grant-all-star-adarius-pickett-early-release/)

Argos also struggling to come to terms with Wynton McManis, almost seems the top DB's are cashing in while the top LB's are taking a hit in an attempt to level the salary playing field.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 13, 2026, 05:36:21 PM
Quote from: VictorRomano on January 13, 2026, 05:34:29 PMDB Adarous Pickett released by Redblacks.  Might we have any interest?

Nah Bomber depth at LB is good, don't upset the apple cart.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 13, 2026, 07:11:37 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 13, 2026, 05:36:21 PMNah Bomber depth at LB is good, don't upset the apple cart.

He was 5th in the league in DT's and is one heck of a defender. I think his SMS will be too high but wow, he's a good one.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 13, 2026, 07:13:03 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 13, 2026, 05:27:20 PMCasey Sayles signs a 2 year deal with BC.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/13/casey-sayles-to-sign-with-b-c-lions-following-release-from-tiger-cats/ (https://3downnation.com/2026/01/13/casey-sayles-to-sign-with-b-c-lions-following-release-from-tiger-cats/)

1st they sign Sankey and now Sayles? Go figure.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Pete on January 13, 2026, 08:13:54 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 13, 2026, 07:13:03 PM1st they sign Sankey and now Sayles? Go figure.
yeah the west just got tougher, once again we miss an opportunity to strengthen our dline
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on January 13, 2026, 10:42:29 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 13, 2026, 07:13:03 PM1st they sign Sankey and now Sayles? Go figure.
We shou1d have signed Say1es!!!
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blueforlife on January 13, 2026, 10:44:32 PM
Pickett will go somewhere for a lot of money, a good player but we don't need him
Bet he was due a bonus

Sayles while expensive, I would have considered
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 14, 2026, 01:49:38 AM
Quote from: VictorRomano on January 13, 2026, 05:34:29 PMLB Adarous Pickett released by Redblacks.  Might we have any interest?

None at all.  We're committed to NAT SAM for the foreseeable future.  And Pickett isn't going to be the "QB of the <anything>".

Even if we were interested, no way we have that kind of FA $ for an IMP SAM!

Other teams will be jumping at him, though!
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 14, 2026, 01:50:45 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 13, 2026, 05:27:20 PMCasey Sayles signs a 2 year deal with BC.

Uh, am I missing something?  Don't we need to enter the tamper period and actual FA before things like this happen?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 14, 2026, 01:56:25 AM
Quote from: Tecno on January 14, 2026, 01:50:45 AMUh, am I missing something?  Don't we need to enter the tamper period and actual FA before things like this happen?


Ti-Cats released him early to get a headstart on FA and avoid a bonus payment, just like Bombers released Kolankowski early and it worked out well in both cases.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 14, 2026, 02:02:06 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 14, 2026, 01:56:25 AMTi-Cats released him early to get a headstart on FA and avoid a bonus payment, just like Bombers released Kolankowski early and it worked out well in both cases.

Ah, so "early release" allows teams to do things pre-tamper/pre-FA?

But if the guy is due to be a FA but is NOT released the other teams have to wait for tamper/FA?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 14, 2026, 02:29:53 AM
Quote from: Tecno on January 14, 2026, 02:02:06 AMAh, so "early release" allows teams to do things pre-tamper/pre-FA?

But if the guy is due to be a FA but is NOT released the other teams have to wait for tamper/FA?


Yep seems to be the case, FA begins Feb. 10th.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 14, 2026, 02:38:34 AM
Dear god, do the Ti-Cats have no clue what they're doing?

Hamilton Tiger-Cats promote Jarryd Baines to offensive co-odinator

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/13/hamilton-tiger-cats-promote-jarryd-baines-to-offensive-coodinator/ (https://3downnation.com/2026/01/13/hamilton-tiger-cats-promote-jarryd-baines-to-offensive-coodinator/)



Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on January 14, 2026, 11:01:21 PM
The coaches cap really sucks.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: VictorRomano on January 15, 2026, 04:04:04 PM
Kolankowski signs with Hamilton, as per CFL transactions page.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 15, 2026, 04:25:52 PM
Logan released ahead of roster bonus due today. I didn't expect him to return but had no idea a bonus was coming due. Good luck to him with a chance to catch on elsewhere. Things just didn't work out here and hopefully Vaval is returning.

Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 15, 2026, 04:46:39 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 15, 2026, 04:25:52 PMLogan released ahead of roster bonus due today. I didn't expect him to return but had no idea a bonus was coming due. Good luck to him with a chance to catch on elsewhere. Things just didn't work out here and hopefully Vaval is returning.

Bit of a surprise, they need an alternative/backup to Vaval whether he comes back or not, and as far as I know they have not identified any suitable candidates unless they decided to elect Cobb, who is also a FA. Not an easy thing to replace a returner and unlikely to catch lightening in a bottle 2 seasons in a row using a newcomer.

Was a big fan of Logan and Mills ever since their rookie seasons in Calgary, could be Logan did not fit in with environment because he's shown great athletic ability in spurts in past seasons.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 15, 2026, 05:03:11 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 15, 2026, 04:46:39 PMBit of a surprise, they need an alternative/backup to Vaval whether he comes back or not, and as far as I know they have not identified any suitable candidates unless they decided to elect Cobb, who is also a FA. Not an easy thing to replace a returner and unlikely to catch lightening in a bottle 2 seasons in a row using a newcomer.

Was a big fan of Logan and Mills ever since their rookie seasons in Calgary, could be Logan did not fit in with environment because he's shown great athletic ability in spurts in past seasons.

Logan was due a $10,000 bonus due today and would earn $110K in 2026. It's true we don't know whether Vaval will return although the Bomber management might have a better idea of whether he's expecting an NFL contract.

Every TC there are receivers and DB's that compete for a role as a returner on top of being a starter or back up on offence.

There are already many signed that have that skill set but whether it translates to the CFL is a TBD.

Hopefully Vaval returns but I'm not yet too concerned about the back up role. Of course that could change to a more significant issue if we hear he's not coming back for TC.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 15, 2026, 05:29:20 PM
Has there been any update on Vaval? IIRC, he had tryouts with the Jets, Browns, and Saints back in early/mid-December.

I sure hope we see him back here in the spring.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on January 15, 2026, 05:32:34 PM
No news is good news for us on Vaval.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 15, 2026, 06:17:18 PM
Lions release DL, DeWayne Hendrick who had a $40K signing bonus due today. That explains them signing Sayles recently.

Hendrick is a good player but he'd be expensive even after being released. TBD but we can see quite a few players being released to these signing bonus contracts.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on January 15, 2026, 06:20:54 PM
RedBlacks extend Geno Lewis.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/15/superstar-signing-ottawa-redblacks-extend-geno-lewis-through-2027/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 15, 2026, 06:58:30 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on January 15, 2026, 06:20:54 PMRedBlacks extend Geno Lewis.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/15/superstar-signing-ottawa-redblacks-extend-geno-lewis-through-2027/

Darn, Gino went from the highest paid receiver in Edmonton to a relative bargain in Ottawa at $220k, guess he's found his happy home.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 15, 2026, 07:07:19 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 15, 2026, 05:03:11 PMLogan was due a $10,000 bonus due today and would earn $110K in 2026. It's true we don't know whether Vaval will return although the Bomber management might have a better idea of whether he's expecting an NFL contract.

Every TC there are receivers and DB's that compete for a role as a returner on top of being a starter or back up on offence.

There are already many signed that have that skill set but whether it translates to the CFL is a TBD.

Hopefully Vaval returns but I'm not yet too concerned about the back up role. Of course that could change to a more significant issue if we hear he's not coming back for TC.

Correct almost every receiver and DB is well equipped to return kicks, but very few pan out, it takes a huge element of fearlessness to do that job well. In Vaval they found someone with the right amount of crazy, even a player as fast as Lucky Whithead approached returns with mucho caution and was overly tentative. 
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 15, 2026, 07:20:43 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 15, 2026, 07:07:19 PMCorrect almost every receiver and DB is well equipped to return kicks, but very few pan out, it takes a huge element of fearlessness to do that job well. In Vaval they found someone with the right amount of crazy, even a player as fast as Lucky Whithead approached returns with mucho caution and was overly tentative. 

I'm not disagreeing but we wouldn't bring in 40 rookies for TC if we knew who would pan out at a given position. We may find a new returner immediately or not. It doesn't take away from the fact that Logan did not succeed given the chance.

So we're no worse off if we have to settle for a rookie back up on an ELC. Keeping in mind that player could also potentially be a back up receiver or DB that is better in that role and could end up as a DI.

IDK if Vaval was brought in primarily to be a DB back up on the PR or whether they thought he'd be best as a returner.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 15, 2026, 07:32:11 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 15, 2026, 07:20:43 PMIDK if Vaval was brought in primarily to be a DB back up on the PR or whether they thought he'd be best as a returner.

You mean brought in to WPG?  I'm pretty sure he was eyed as a DB who could also return.  Like a Fogg.  The fact he was the next Grant was a bonus that just proved their hunch.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 15, 2026, 07:34:59 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 15, 2026, 05:03:11 PMHopefully Vaval returns but I'm not yet too concerned about the back up role.

Ya, "backup returner" is not a critical role like "backup NAT RB" or "backup C".  You can still play & win games with a nobody as returner.  Heck, we've had our share of that in the last decade.  All you really need is a dude who can stand back there and catch it without fumbling.  That's it.  Who cares if he gets 0Y every return.

There have been times we'd put AH or Demski back there.  Or whoever was our IMP backup RB.

We can easily go into TC without having a clear backup.  Then just pick the best of the rest for that role.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 15, 2026, 08:08:17 PM
Quote from: Tecno on January 15, 2026, 07:34:59 PMYa, "backup returner" is not a critical role like "backup NAT RB" or "backup C".  You can still play & win games with a nobody as returner.  Heck, we've had our share of that in the last decade.  All you really need is a dude who can stand back there and catch it without fumbling.  That's it.  Who cares if he gets 0Y every return.

There have been times we'd put AH or Demski back there.  Or whoever was our IMP backup RB.

We can easily go into TC without having a clear backup.  Then just pick the best of the rest for that role.


You must forget how painful it is to lose 20+ yds. field position on every punt exchange due to an inadequate returner vs. a supereior one.  Almost as bad as being brutally out punted.

Mario Alford is a FA, Riderfans are always discussing replacing him because of his age (34), if Vaval does not return this season, Alford could fill in as a returner that still provides ball security and above average returns on a one year contract.  At 34 won't be many teams interested so should come reasonabllly cheap if signed just prior to TC.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 15, 2026, 08:24:49 PM
Quote from: Tecno on January 15, 2026, 07:32:11 PMYou mean brought in to WPG?  I'm pretty sure he was eyed as a DB who could also return.  Like a Fogg.  The fact he was the next Grant was a bonus that just proved their hunch.


Well that's the point. Several players will be brought in with those skill sets. Until they hit the CFL field in TC, nobody can be certain how they'll do.

So you may be correct that he was first fighting to win a DB spot with the additional capability to return. Ironically if Logan as performed as expected then Vaval might have never seen the field as the primary returner. Hard to say if he would have made the roster as a DB back up.

Yes we'll need someone to win the back up role on the PR. TC roster usually has a dozen or so DB's and Rec's. Someone will make the PR that can serve that need.

Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 16, 2026, 02:10:39 AM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 15, 2026, 08:24:49 PMVaval might have never seen the field as the primary returner. Hard to say if he would have made the roster as a DB back up.

I think it was in the GC Saturday show (or maybe (and/or) elsewhere?) Vaval did another interview and he was saying all of the right things.  I know we always say "seems like a MOS guy", but with Vaval it seems uber genuine.  He seems like a wants-to-learn-aholic.  Seems to want to be here.

I have little doubt that he, at bare minimum, would have made the PR all season as backup DB, if not the AR -- even if he didn't pan out as returner.  All in all I think he did very well as a raw rookie corner.  Not the instant natural DB like Nichols or Holm or D.Alford, but certainly as good as many others have done in their first handful of starts.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 16, 2026, 02:15:53 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 15, 2026, 08:08:17 PMYou must forget how painful it is to lose 20+ yds. field position on every punt exchange due to an inadequate returner vs. a supereior one.  Almost as bad as being brutally out punted.

Mario Alford is a FA

We spent all of '24 "losing" 20Y field position on every exchange, and we still made the cup!  And we're talking disaster scenario anyhow, which doesn't always come to fruition.  You hope Vaval would remain healthy 90% of the games, and if he doesn't you can always look THEN for a couch sitter, aged-out vet, or trade.  Or just roll with the "just catch the darn ball" next man up.

Paying Logan his decent fee in '25 was a complete bust: why would we repeat that on purpose with Alford?  No one signs an Alford-level guy just to be the backup, unless this is truly his final year before retiring (like Logan or Lucky).

If Alford was ELC+$10k, ya ok, why not.  But not for $110k+...  Unless Vaval is stuck in the NFL all season and nothing shows up at TC.  I seriously doubt that happens.

Yes, Alford would be ok to get you the reliable short return on every kick.  Yes, that has some value.  And in that sense he's ideal if cheap and you have no other options.  But he's not busting anything anymore, and you'll find he's WAY less effective in WPG because we aren't the ST hold-fest that SSK is.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on January 16, 2026, 02:54:27 PM
Argos sign Adarius Pickett.

https://www.cfl.ca/2026/01/16/argonauts-sign-adarius-pickett/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Pete on January 16, 2026, 03:52:08 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on January 16, 2026, 02:54:27 PMArgos sign Adarius Pickett.

https://www.cfl.ca/2026/01/16/argonauts-sign-adarius-pickett/
May be an indicator that they wont re-sign Mcmanus.They have Judge,Darkangelo and now Pickett
Whoever signs Mcmanus will be a huge add
 
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 16, 2026, 04:35:19 PM
Quote from: Pete on January 16, 2026, 03:52:08 PMMay be an indicator that they wont re-sign Mcmanus.They have Judge,Darkangelo and now Pickett
Whoever signs Mcmanus will be a huge add
 

Could be. BC would be another team as a non option with their LB depth.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 16, 2026, 05:03:12 PM
Quote from: Tecno on January 16, 2026, 02:10:39 AMI think it was in the GC Saturday show (or maybe (and/or) elsewhere?) Vaval did another interview and he was saying all of the right things.  I know we always say "seems like a MOS guy", but with Vaval it seems uber genuine.  He seems like a wants-to-learn-aholic.  Seems to want to be here.

I have little doubt that he, at bare minimum, would have made the PR all season as backup DB, if not the AR -- even if he didn't pan out as returner.  All in all I think he did very well as a raw rookie corner.  Not the instant natural DB like Nichols or Holm or D.Alford, but certainly as good as many others have done in their first handful of starts.

Have to wonder if Vaval would have a more lucrative and longer career as a DB now that salaries have dratically improved for the best few. He made a few mistakes but also had flashes of brilliance so I think a  career as a CB was a possibility before he exploded as a returner, that option has likely been taken away from him and he'll be forever characterized as a returner only, much like Grant.

Pretty rare for a returner to last more than 3-4 years and their effectivness often seems to peter out along the way.

Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 16, 2026, 05:16:16 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 16, 2026, 05:03:12 PMHave to wonder if Vaval would have a more lucrative and longer career as a DB now that salaries have dratically improved for the best few. He made a few mistakes but also had flashes of brilliance so I think a  career as a CB was a possibility before he exploded as a returner, that option has likely been taken away from him and he'll be forever characterized as a returner only, much like Grant.

Pretty rare for a returner to last more than 3-4 years and their effectivness often seems to peter out along the way.



I agree that he may have taken himself out of chances as a DB starter by doing so well as a returner. He could see time as an in game injury DB being a DI as a returner. That has an advantage for the team but won't do much for his salary.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 16, 2026, 05:18:40 PM
Quote from: Tecno on January 16, 2026, 02:15:53 AMWe spent all of '24 "losing" 20Y field position on every exchange, and we still made the cup!  And we're talking disaster scenario anyhow, which doesn't always come to fruition.  You hope Vaval would remain healthy 90% of the games, and if he doesn't you can always look THEN for a couch sitter, aged-out vet, or trade.  Or just roll with the "just catch the darn ball" next man up.

Paying Logan his decent fee in '25 was a complete bust: why would we repeat that on purpose with Alford?  No one signs an Alford-level guy just to be the backup, unless this is truly his final year before retiring (like Logan or Lucky).

If Alford was ELC+$10k, ya ok, why not.  But not for $110k+...  Unless Vaval is stuck in the NFL all season and nothing shows up at TC.  I seriously doubt that happens.

Yes, Alford would be ok to get you the reliable short return on every kick. Yes, that has some value.  And in that sense he's ideal if cheap and you have no other options.  But he's not busting anything anymore, and you'll find he's WAY less effective in WPG because we aren't the ST hold-fest that SSK is.


Alford is still reasonablly effective and capable of breaking longer returns, he was 7th in punt return yds. at 10.8 yd. avg. and 6th in kick off return yds. with a 28.3 yds avg. which is very good.

Janarion Grant is also a FA, so if Vaval does not return and they can't find a suitable replacement they have a couple of old reliable options they could look at to get them by.

A good returner gives the offence a headstart in lift, field position and momentum, I think it's a critically important part of the game.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 16, 2026, 05:37:07 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 16, 2026, 05:18:40 PMAlford is still reasonablly effective and capable of breaking longer returns, he was 7th in punt return yds. at 10.8 yd. avg. and 6th in kick off return yds. with a 28.3 yds avg. which is very good.

Janarion Grant is also a FA, so if Vaval does not return and they can't find a suitable replacement they have a couple of old reliable options they could look at to get them by.

A good returner gives the offence a headstart in lift, field position and momentum, I think it's a critically important part of the game.

If Grant gets to the tampering window I wouldn't be upset to make him an offer at the right price. IIRC Logan got $128K in 2025 and something like that could work. Grant is a more reliable option to Logan.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on January 16, 2026, 05:51:15 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 16, 2026, 05:03:12 PMHave to wonder if Vaval would have a more lucrative and longer career as a DB now that salaries have dratically improved for the best few. He made a few mistakes but also had flashes of brilliance so I think a  career as a CB was a possibility before he exploded as a returner, that option has likely been taken away from him and he'll be forever characterized as a returner only, much like Grant.

Pretty rare for a returner to last more than 3-4 years and their effectivness often seems to peter out along the way.



We've used starters as returners before. He'll have every opportunity to be a DB as well.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 16, 2026, 05:55:04 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 16, 2026, 05:51:15 PMWe've used starters as returners before. He'll have every opportunity to be a DB as well.

Not recently, how long ago was Kevin Fogg?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on January 16, 2026, 10:36:50 PM
Not only is he the perfect extra defensive back on the roster but with the number of mixed personnel we use I'm sure he'll get on the field more in year two on defense.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 17, 2026, 05:01:17 AM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 16, 2026, 05:37:07 PMIf Grant gets to the tampering window I wouldn't be upset to make him an offer at the right price. IIRC Logan got $128K in 2025 and something like that could work. Grant is a more reliable option to Logan.

Haha, good luck with that.  Grant will easily be the highest paid returner this FA.  No more discount for TOR just because they were the only ones who could (and bothered) to track him down.

No way we do Grant if Vaval is likely to return (which is like 90%).  Vaval is ELC remember!  Doesn't get cheaper than that.  And we can't have 2 monsters for 1 return job.  Remember when we had Lucky and Grant -- had to release Lucky immediately in FA to avoid that conflict.

If for some reason we think Vaval is gonzo, then 100% you make a stab at Grant.  He'll probably get $175k though.  And he still has some use on O, too, if you like living dangerously.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on January 19, 2026, 08:49:10 PM
Riders extend CDN. receiver Kian Schaffer-Baker

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/19/saskatchewan-roughriders-re-sign-kian-schaffer-baker-through-2027/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Waffler on January 19, 2026, 09:17:57 PM
Quote from: Tecno on January 17, 2026, 05:01:17 AMGrant will easily be the highest paid returner this FA
I'll give the contrarian view. My biggest concern is that he's 32 and in six seasons has never played the full 18 games. As receiver (153 career yards) or running back (106 career yards) his numbers are truly dismal. Crazy to even give him a regular down considering his fragility. Seems a gamble to over pay here.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Pigskin on January 19, 2026, 10:47:04 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on January 19, 2026, 08:49:10 PMRiders extend CDN. receiver Kian Schaffer-Baker

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/19/saskatchewan-roughriders-re-sign-kian-schaffer-baker-through-2027/

The problem with KSB he can't stay healthy. He's played in 57 games over the last 5 years.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 19, 2026, 10:53:21 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on January 19, 2026, 08:49:10 PMRiders extend CDN. receiver Kian Schaffer-Baker

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/19/saskatchewan-roughriders-re-sign-kian-schaffer-baker-through-2027/

Any estimates of salary?

Leftover Natl. receivers Tommy Nield and Picton, solid but unspectacular.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: bluebeard on January 21, 2026, 09:04:34 PM
Nield would be a good pick up and Picton will probably retire.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Pigskin on January 24, 2026, 03:09:36 PM
Pickett. Argo's give him $191K in hard money. $80K signing bonus. $202K max money.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on January 24, 2026, 07:40:36 PM
Tiger Cats and Tim White part ways.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/24/tim-white-hamilton-tiger-cats-mutually-agree-to-part-ways/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 26, 2026, 01:33:55 AM
Quote from: Waffler on January 19, 2026, 09:17:57 PMI'll give the contrarian view. My biggest concern is that he's 32 and in six seasons has never played the full 18 games.

Grant gets hurt, but I think astute CFL teams can deal with that, especially if they have a great #2 returner on standby.  Just offer Grant big money with ZERO signing bonus and the instant he gets hurt move him to the 6G.  Boom, zero risk to SMS.  Even if you have to overpay him to accept the no-bonus stipulation, it can still work out.

That said, it would be very tough for us to make it work whilst having Vaval, unless we wanted to make Vaval a full-time DB until Grant gets hurt.. and that's the only way to have both on the AR.  However, having both Grant/Vaval back there on kicks would be a blast.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on January 26, 2026, 04:33:04 PM
Riders extend all CFL guard Jacob Brammer.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/26/saskatchewan-roughriders-extend-all-cfl-guard-jacob-brammer/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: JockitchwithRich on January 26, 2026, 04:51:24 PM
Just caught on TSN page that Austin Mack and the Als are
mutually parting
Only 28 with decent numbers when he plays
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on January 26, 2026, 04:57:40 PM
Quote from: JockitchwithRich on January 26, 2026, 04:51:24 PMJust caught on TSN page that Austin Mack and the Als are
mutually parting
Only 28 with decent numbers when he plays

Hasn't been healthy the past couple years is the main thing.

I guess it depends on where he's at.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 26, 2026, 05:08:15 PM
Stampeders re-sign LB Moncrief (https://www.cfl.ca/2026/01/26/stamps-derrick-moncrief-agree-to-extension/)

RedBlacks re-sign WR Hardy (https://www.cfl.ca/2026/01/26/redblacks-extend-receiver-justin-hardy/)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 26, 2026, 07:52:00 PM
Hamilton Tiger-Cats release Drew Wolitarsky ahead of offseason bonus.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/26/hamilton-tiger-cats-release-drew-wolitarsky-ahead-of-offseason-bonus/ (https://3downnation.com/2026/01/26/hamilton-tiger-cats-release-drew-wolitarsky-ahead-of-offseason-bonus/)

Probably time for Woli to hang up the cleats, spent most of last season as a healthy scratch on the 1 game.

He may not be experienced but can't think of a better person to bring in as the remaining position coach, if he's interested.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on January 26, 2026, 10:41:55 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 26, 2026, 04:57:40 PMHasn't been healthy the past couple years is the main thing.

I guess it depends on where he's at.
Quote from: JockitchwithRich on January 26, 2026, 04:51:24 PMJust caught on TSN page that Austin Mack and the Als are
mutually parting
Only 28 with decent numbers when he plays
His hamstring injury is sti11 1ingering?? otherwise when he p1ays hes an impact receiver
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Pigskin on January 26, 2026, 10:59:00 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 26, 2026, 04:57:40 PMHasn't been healthy the past couple years is the main thing.

I guess it depends on where he's at.

Kenny Lawler hadn't played a full season until last year. 81 games out of a possible 104. If he's healthy, he makes plays. 
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on January 26, 2026, 11:09:08 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on January 26, 2026, 10:59:00 PMKenny Lawler hadn't played a full season until last year. 81 games out of a possible 104. If he's healthy, he makes plays. 

Injuries were only part of the issue with Lawler missing games.

But I agree I want to give Mack a call, it's just worth noting that he has yet to repeat his rookie season.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on January 27, 2026, 05:17:26 PM
Quote from: JockitchwithRich on January 26, 2026, 04:51:24 PMJust caught on TSN page that Austin Mack and the Als are
mutually parting


Another lanky home-run guy that we don't really need, especially if we re-sign Wheatie.  Hardy was more like what we need right now.  Oh well.

And Mack's ask will be too high.  That said, I've seen Mafia do weirder things...
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Pigskin on January 27, 2026, 09:13:20 PM
Argo's sign Shepley 6'4 306 (OL) former 1st round pick of the Riders in 2018.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on January 28, 2026, 06:33:28 PM
Riders release receiver Shawn Bane Jr.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/28/saskatchewan-roughriders-release-shawn-bane-jr-ahead-of-cfl-free-agency/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 28, 2026, 06:36:38 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on January 28, 2026, 06:33:28 PMRiders release receiver Shawn Bane Jr.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/28/saskatchewan-roughriders-release-shawn-bane-jr-ahead-of-cfl-free-agency/

No please, no.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 28, 2026, 06:40:38 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on January 27, 2026, 09:13:20 PMArgo's sign Shepley 6'4 306 (OL) former 1st round pick of the Riders in 2018.

Alright, I believe this is another case of a player not returning to the team that released him to go to the NFL.  Have a link to the story?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 28, 2026, 06:43:04 PM
Riders re-sign KeeSean Johnson, the Rider receiving corps. is now eating up a lot of their SMS budget.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/28/saskatchewan-roughriders-sign-all-cfl-receiver-keesean-johnson-to-multi-year-contract-extension/ (https://3downnation.com/2026/01/28/saskatchewan-roughriders-sign-all-cfl-receiver-keesean-johnson-to-multi-year-contract-extension/)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 28, 2026, 06:55:01 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 28, 2026, 06:40:38 PMAlright, I believe this is another case of a player not returning to the team that released him to go to the NFL.  Have a link to the story?

He last played in the CFL in 2019. His CFL contract had expired and he was free to sign anywhere.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Waffler on January 28, 2026, 08:38:45 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 28, 2026, 06:40:38 PMHave a link to the story?

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/27/toronto-argonauts-sign-former-riders-first-round-cfl-draft-pick-dakoda-shepley-after-long-nfl-stint-sources/

Talented player I would have liked here BUT...the deal will make Shepley the highest-paid offensive lineman in the CFL.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 28, 2026, 09:05:19 PM
Quote from: Waffler on January 28, 2026, 08:38:45 PMhttps://3downnation.com/2026/01/27/toronto-argonauts-sign-former-riders-first-round-cfl-draft-pick-dakoda-shepley-after-long-nfl-stint-sources/

Talented player I would have liked here BUT...the deal will make Shepley the highest-paid offensive lineman in the CFL.

Where did you see he'd be the highest paid OL?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on January 29, 2026, 04:19:17 PM
Austin Mack to the Elks.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/29/edmonton-elks-sign-receiver-austin-mack-after-release-from-montreal-alouettes-sources/

Dan Ralph reports: "Hearing WR Austin Mack's two-year deal with Edmonton is for $425k in hard money with a max value of $439k and includes a $55k signing bonus.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: theaardvark on January 29, 2026, 05:20:32 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on January 29, 2026, 04:19:17 PMAustin Mack to the Elks.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/29/edmonton-elks-sign-receiver-austin-mack-after-release-from-montreal-alouettes-sources/

Dan Ralph reports: "Hearing WR Austin Mack's two-year deal with Edmonton is for $425k in hard money with a max value of $439k and includes a $55k signing bonus.

What a difference a year makes.  Looks like he got a pay bump coming from "the only place he wants to play in the CFL"


For a healthy Mack playing 16+ games a year, that's a decent price.  Not sure its a 2/3rds season value, especially if you can't 6 game him.



Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 29, 2026, 05:48:58 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 29, 2026, 05:20:32 PMWhat a difference a year makes.  Looks like he got a pay bump coming from "the only place he wants to play in the CFL"


For a healthy Mack playing 16+ games a year, that's a decent price.  Not sure its a 2/3rds season value, especially if you can't 6 game him.

Steven Dunbar might be available at a tier 2 pay rate now.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on January 29, 2026, 05:52:45 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on January 28, 2026, 06:33:28 PMRiders release receiver Shawn Bane Jr.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/28/saskatchewan-roughriders-release-shawn-bane-jr-ahead-of-cfl-free-agency/
They cou1dn't resign them a11, but that's the reciever I was expecting them to re1ease, he was the weakest of the bunch
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 29, 2026, 06:14:27 PM
Quote from: dd on January 29, 2026, 05:52:45 PMThey cou1dn't resign them a11, but that's the reciever I was expecting them to re1ease, he was the weakest of the bunch

Off topic but is your L key broken or something? All your posts lately have 1s where lower case Ls should be. :o
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 29, 2026, 06:23:34 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on January 29, 2026, 06:14:27 PMOff topic but is your L key broken or something? All your posts lately have 1s where lower case Ls should be. :o

That's just a glimpse of the future, if you don't pay a subscription fee for your keyboard, you lose a few keys every month. Smart my ***.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 29, 2026, 06:29:30 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 29, 2026, 06:23:34 PMThat's just a glimpse of the future, if you don't pay a subscription fee for your keyboard, you lose a few keys every month. Smart my ***.

(https://y.yarn.co/510fe551-7792-47ed-88ca-07d4b708a19f_text.gif)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: bunker on January 29, 2026, 06:49:33 PM
The pay scale has clearly been reset for the top tier players. Would be nice if the guys at the bottom get a bump also by increasing the minimum salary.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 29, 2026, 07:04:34 PM
Quote from: bunker on January 29, 2026, 06:49:33 PMThe pay scale has clearly been reset for the top tier players. Would be nice if the guys at the bottom get a bump also by increasing the minimum salary.

Walters best work is often from the bottom of the deck, Tony Jones, Griffin, Dexter Lawson, Nick Taylor, all solid players he found in the bargain bin.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on January 29, 2026, 07:12:09 PM
Quote from: bunker on January 29, 2026, 06:49:33 PMThe pay scale has clearly been reset for the top tier players. Would be nice if the guys at the bottom get a bump also by increasing the minimum salary.

That was done in the last CBA.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: theaardvark on January 29, 2026, 07:17:55 PM
Quote from: bunker on January 29, 2026, 06:49:33 PMThe pay scale has clearly been reset for the top tier players. Would be nice if the guys at the bottom get a bump also by increasing the minimum salary.

Why?

The grunts deserve a pay raise if the elites get on, right?

But do they.

The option to an ELC may be flipping a burger, or worse, a UFL gig.

For the league to be viable, you need both ends of the spectrum, and the current ELC deal is nothing to sneeze at, its far more than a living wage, over the full year it is about equivalent to a 40 hour work week at $35/hour plus benefits.

I don't think upping the ELC min wage would attract any more players, and because so much of the league is dependent on having these ELC guys make up a good percentage of the team, I'd rather add another player (job) or two on the roster at ELC than bump the ELC. 

That would make a much bigger difference in player development than increasing the min wage.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: bunker on January 29, 2026, 08:00:54 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 29, 2026, 07:12:09 PMThat was done in the last CBA.
My understanding is that they've been stuck at 70,000 minimum salary unchanged since 2023. Inflation in Canada has been about 8% over that time, equating to an 8% pay cut for these guys. They work hard, careers are short, I'd rather give another 10,000 per year to the botttom of the roster guys than 20-30,000 more to the top. But then, I was a socialist in my youth.  :D
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: theaardvark on January 29, 2026, 08:03:30 PM
Quote from: bunker on January 29, 2026, 08:00:54 PMMy understanding is that they've been stuck at 70,000 minimum salary unchanged since 2023. Inflation in Canada has been about 8% over that time, equating to an 8% pay cut for these guys. They work hard, careers are short, I'd rather give another 10,000 per year to the botttom of the roster guys than 20-30,000 more to the top. But then, I was a socialist in my youth.  :D

But would you rather give $10k extra to 21 guys, or 3 more guys $70k?

Smae outlay, but 3 more players.  Imagine having 7 DI's to spread around...
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on January 29, 2026, 08:04:13 PM
Quote from: bunker on January 29, 2026, 08:00:54 PMMy understanding is that they've been stuck at 70,000 minimum salary unchanged since 2023. Inflation in Canada has been about 8% over that time, equating to an 8% pay cut for these guys. They work hard, careers are short, I'd rather give another 10,000 per year to the botttom of the roster guys than 20-30,000 more to the top. But then, I was a socialist in my youth.  :D

Yup, because the CBA was done in 2022. I imagine they'll get a bump in the next CBA, but not before.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: bunker on January 29, 2026, 08:26:07 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 29, 2026, 08:04:13 PMYup, because the CBA was done in 2022. I imagine they'll get a bump in the next CBA, but not before.

The CFLPA had the freedom to allocate the increase differently. For example they allocated 50,000 per team for veteran pre-season compensation. I think the fact that they didn't allocate any to the ELC guys is a comment on who runs the CFLPA. I think it's skewed toward the interests of more longstanding higher paid players.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 29, 2026, 08:47:59 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 29, 2026, 08:04:13 PMYup, because the CBA was done in 2022. I imagine they'll get a bump in the next CBA, but not before.

"The current CFL/CFLPA Collective Bargaining Agreement runs for seven years, officially expiring on December 31, 2029, or 30 days prior to the first day of training camp in 2029. However, a key opt-out clause exists that allows either side to reopen negotiations ahead of the 2027 season, based on the expiration of the league's TV deal. "

The current deal runs for 7 years?  That's crazy, a lot of hate must have built up between the 2 sides!.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on January 29, 2026, 10:45:49 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 29, 2026, 08:47:59 PM"The current CFL/CFLPA Collective Bargaining Agreement runs for seven years, officially expiring on December 31, 2029, or 30 days prior to the first day of training camp in 2029. However, a key opt-out clause exists that allows either side to reopen negotiations ahead of the 2027 season, based on the expiration of the league's TV deal. "

The current deal runs for 7 years?  That's crazy, a lot of hate must have built up between the 2 sides!.

The CFLPA has an opt out date that's mentioned in what you posted. If they're unhappy, they can go back to the bargaining table.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 30, 2026, 01:24:22 PM
Lions re-sign RB Butler through 2027 (https://www.tsn.ca/cfl/article/lions-sign-star-rb-butler-to-two-year-contract-ahead-of-free-agency/)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on January 30, 2026, 02:07:21 PM
Quote from: bunker on January 29, 2026, 08:26:07 PMThe CFLPA had the freedom to allocate the increase differently. For example they allocated 50,000 per team for veteran pre-season compensation. I think the fact that they didn't allocate any to the ELC guys is a comment on who runs the CFLPA. I think it's skewed toward the interests of more longstanding higher paid players.

We obviously don't have full transparency (because CFL), but I doubt the CFLPA has full discretion to do whatever the want with the new money.

That said, I don't think they're concerned with the minimum salary. They want to represent the members who are already part of the league (hence the veteran bump you mentioned). I think they're less worried about players who haven't played a snap yet.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: theaardvark on January 30, 2026, 04:06:14 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 30, 2026, 02:07:21 PMWe obviously don't have full transparency (because CFL), but I doubt the CFLPA has full discretion to do whatever the want with the new money.

That said, I don't think they're concerned with the minimum salary. They want to represent the members who are already part of the league (hence the veteran bump you mentioned). I think they're less worried about players who haven't played a snap yet.

There has always been the question about whether the CFLPA serves the vets in the league, who make up their board and voting block, or all the players, including potential players.

I'm not sure what the requirements are for a new member, do they join and get a vote as soon as they are signed to even a futures or PR deal?  Or is it only players on AR's that are "dues paying members".

If they serve all members and potential members equally, expanding the rosters should be a higher priority than getting the top 5% a pay bump...

That's just my opinion.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 30, 2026, 05:07:47 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 30, 2026, 04:06:14 PMThere has always been the question about whether the CFLPA serves the vets in the league, who make up their board and voting block, or all the players, including potential players.

I'm not sure what the requirements are for a new member, do they join and get a vote as soon as they are signed to even a futures or PR deal?  Or is it only players on AR's that are "dues paying members".

If they serve all members and potential members equally, expanding the rosters should be a higher priority than getting the top 5% a pay bump...

That's just my opinion.

I've long been a supporter to add another 2 - 4 players to the AR. Adding 2 would be the easiest with 1 National and 1 more DI.

My preference would actually be to add 2 DI's to aid in the development by actually getting into games. That said I'd also accept just 2 more Canadian draft choices onto the AR.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 30, 2026, 08:09:18 PM
Als sign Devonte Deadmon over James Letcher.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/30/montreal-alouettes-sign-returner-devonte-dedmon-following-release-by-redblacks/ (https://3downnation.com/2026/01/30/montreal-alouettes-sign-returner-devonte-dedmon-following-release-by-redblacks/)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on January 30, 2026, 08:32:33 PM
Red Blacks release LB Jovan Santos-Knox.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/30/ottawa-redblacks-release-veteran-linebacker-jovan-santos-knox/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: bunker on January 30, 2026, 08:36:36 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 30, 2026, 02:07:21 PMWe obviously don't have full transparency (because CFL), but I doubt the CFLPA has full discretion to do whatever the want with the new money.

That said, I don't think they're concerned with the minimum salary. They want to represent the members who are already part of the league (hence the veteran bump you mentioned). I think they're less worried about players who haven't played a snap yet.
https://www.cfl.ca/2026/01/23/2025-season-yields-10m-in-league-wide-revenue-growth/

My impression from this is that the CFLPA had discretion to determine where their share of revenue growth was allocated.

There are players in their second year who will earn the minimum if they signed 2 year contracts. Raising the minimum will also end up benefiting all players at the lower pay scale, veterans included, since you will not likely pay a special teams player who's a vet 85,000 if league minimum rises to 80,000.
I agree they probably are less concerned with players who have not yet played a snap, but this is basically based on self-interest rather than any true principle, such as trying to figure out a more equitable arrangement for all players.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 31, 2026, 02:58:38 PM
24 hours until the tampering free agency windows opens. Still about 150 players on the list. We'll probably see a few more late re-signings across the league as the window approaches.

Looking forward to see which players find new teams in the early hours tomorrow. There is still some top talent available but which teams want to improve in certain areas is not as obvious.

I'd like to think the Bombers can make a significant move or 2 tomorrow. I realize players can't actually sign those deals yet but they can agree in principle.

Of the 150 players, 50 probably never play in the CFL again. 50 are tier 2 or tier 3 ST types that may see some activity once the actual free agency opens.

So that leaves about 50 very good players we may see some activity on early. 3rddown listed the top 50 and that was interesting.

Quite a few DL: Carney, Ceresna and Rose come to mind. Age, injury history and SMS will be a pro versus con choice.

Dequoy would be a great addition but we don't really need another very expensive Canadian starter.

Gittens is of interest and could displace / improve a weak Canadian receiving group.

I don't see us chasing any LB's, DB's, RB's or import OL so that narrows the list.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: peg_city on January 31, 2026, 04:56:57 PM
https://3downnation.com/2026/01/31/2026-cfl-free-agent-rankings-top-50/

#2/6/10 & #3 would fit nicely in Winnipeg.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: gordo on January 31, 2026, 05:34:35 PM
We need to sign this guy...  12) QB Tre Ford, Free Agent (N)

And then his brother.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on January 31, 2026, 07:52:44 PM
Quote from: gordo on January 31, 2026, 05:34:35 PMWe need to sign this guy...  12) QB Tre Ford, Free Agent (N)

And then his brother.


Nope to both, lol.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 31, 2026, 09:37:25 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 31, 2026, 07:52:44 PMNope to both, lol.

His brother isn't a free agent but if he was I'd try and bring him back. We don't have a CB returning at the moment. Yes he'd be expensive and that's the downside.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on January 31, 2026, 10:06:53 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 31, 2026, 09:37:25 PMHis brother isn't a free agent but if he was I'd try and bring him back. We don't have a CB returning at the moment. Yes he'd be expensive and that's the downside.

...Sign them both and have them both compete for corner back is really the way to handle those guys. 
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on January 31, 2026, 10:48:24 PM
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on January 31, 2026, 10:06:53 PM...Sign them both and have them both compete for corner back is really the way to handle those guys. 

I don't think there is much chance Tre ford beats out Tyrell as a CB. My thinking is that while we don't NEED another starting Canadian, it would allow us to seamlessly move to a 3 import OL. A import OL is still possible but means we lose the ability to have another import elsewhere.

Ford flips an import spot to a Canadian spot. His current contract is $236K which seems " less " based against new 2026 SMS for Holm and Nichols this year compared to last year.

I don't see the Elks trading Tyrell but it's an interesting thought.

Dequoy had a $161K max and is an actual pending free agent. He'd also flip an import spot to a Canadian, so same potential upside.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: M.O.A.B. on January 31, 2026, 11:29:02 PM
Tyrell Ford is signed with Edm thru 2027. So he won't be a free-agent for a couple of years.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: ModAdmin on January 31, 2026, 11:32:08 PM
Wonder if Tyrell regrets leaving the Bombers now?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Pete on January 31, 2026, 11:46:16 PM
Quote from: ModAdmin on January 31, 2026, 11:32:08 PMWonder if Tyrell regrets leaving the Bombers now?
he has 230k yearly to console him
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on February 01, 2026, 12:09:23 AM
Quote from: ModAdmin on January 31, 2026, 11:32:08 PMWonder if Tyrell regrets leaving the Bombers now?

Nope. He left to the highest bidder and nothing has changed.

Quote from: Blue In BC on January 31, 2026, 09:37:25 PMHis brother isn't a free agent but if he was I'd try and bring him back. We don't have a CB returning at the moment. Yes he'd be expensive and that's the downside.

Exactly, he's not a FA. And even if he was, I doubt much has changed from the Bombers' perspective. We have many highly paid position groups. We need to be able to rely on our scouting to fill in the gaps - corner is always where we try and save money.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 01, 2026, 01:03:28 AM
Quote from: ModAdmin on January 31, 2026, 11:32:08 PMWonder if Tyrell regrets leaving the Bombers now?

He never really got into Wpg. anyway, don't think he cared much when he left.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: ModAdmin on February 01, 2026, 03:45:36 AM
Hard to say what he real reason for leaving Winnipeg.  At the time he said his goal was to play with his brother, but money also enters into the equation as well.  All things being equal (which they are not) I would bring him back if we ever have the chance. 
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on February 01, 2026, 01:41:41 PM
Riders re-sign DL Mike Rose.

https://3downnation.com/2026/01/31/saskatchewan-roughriders-re-sign-disruptive-defensive-lineman-mike-rose/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on February 01, 2026, 02:50:34 PM
Riders re-sign RB A.J. Ouellette

The Saskatchewan Roughriders have re-signed American running back A.J. Ouellette to a one-year contract extension.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 01, 2026, 03:43:13 PM
Has the tampering window opened?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: DCM on February 01, 2026, 04:14:20 PM
From what I'm seeing on socials, yes.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: DCM on February 01, 2026, 04:51:17 PM
@FarhanLaljiTSN
QB Taylor Powell has agreed to a 2-year deal with #Elks. Could become their QB of the future. OL Brendan Bordner also on his way from #TiCats to Edm. #CFLFA
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 01, 2026, 05:01:24 PM
Quote from: DCM on February 01, 2026, 04:51:17 PM@FarhanLaljiTSN
QB Taylor Powell has agreed to a 2-year deal with #Elks. Could become their QB of the future. OL Brendan Bordner also on his way from #TiCats to Edm. #CFLFA

Darn, I predicted this one!
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on February 01, 2026, 05:19:53 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 01, 2026, 05:01:24 PMDarn, I predicted this one!

It's a good spot for him. Good deal for both sides.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Waffler on February 01, 2026, 05:20:27 PM
https://3downnation.com/2026/02/01/montreal-alouettes-agree-to-terms-with-jerreth-sterns-sources/

Sterns to Montreal
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on February 01, 2026, 05:25:31 PM
Quote from: Waffler on February 01, 2026, 05:20:27 PMhttps://3downnation.com/2026/02/01/montreal-alouettes-agree-to-terms-with-jerreth-sterns-sources/

Sterns to Montreal

One of the only guys I would have liked to have back, but White made him expendable.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Pete on February 01, 2026, 05:30:53 PM
Edm once again on the rampage  ;;https://3downnation.com/2026/02/01/edmonton-elks-agree-to-terms-with-former-riders-defensive-lineman-malik-carney-sources/
Replaced Ceresna with Carney
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: M.O.A.B. on February 01, 2026, 05:34:21 PM
We need a DT! Hopefully that comes next.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on February 01, 2026, 05:34:48 PM
Quote from: M.O.A.B. on February 01, 2026, 05:34:21 PMWe need a DT! Hopefully that comes next.

We're closing in on Ceresna!
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: M.O.A.B. on February 01, 2026, 05:34:59 PM
Quote from: Pete on February 01, 2026, 05:30:53 PMEdm once again on the rampage  ;;https://3downnation.com/2026/02/01/edmonton-elks-agree-to-terms-with-former-riders-defensive-lineman-malik-carney-sources/
Replaced Ceresna with Carney

Ceresna was a DT, Carney is an edge.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 01, 2026, 05:39:22 PM

Edmonton Elks agree to terms with former Riders receiver Joe Robustelli:

Nield provided the passport advantage but Robustelli was my 2nd choice.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 01, 2026, 05:48:34 PM
Quote from: Waffler on February 01, 2026, 05:20:27 PMhttps://3downnation.com/2026/02/01/montreal-alouettes-agree-to-terms-with-jerreth-sterns-sources/

Sterns to Montreal

They already have Snead, don't see why they'd want Sterns.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: M.O.A.B. on February 01, 2026, 05:57:38 PM
QB Maier to Ottawa
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on February 01, 2026, 05:57:59 PM
We need to make a move on our DL and still need 1 more CB. The CB spot might be filled by a rookie, but that's a TBD.

The DL OTOH needs some veteran experience and skill.

Back up QB might be a area we make a move but Powell is off the table now. I'm not sure if we were speaking with him or who the next choice MIGHT be? I guess Crum might be one we consider.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: M.O.A.B. on February 01, 2026, 05:59:25 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 01, 2026, 05:48:34 PMThey already have Snead, don't see why they'd want Sterns.

To complete their triple S.

Snead - Spieker - Sterns
;D
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: M.O.A.B. on February 01, 2026, 06:00:13 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 01, 2026, 05:57:59 PMWe need to make a move on our DL and still need 1 more CB. The CB spot might be filled by a rookie, but that's a TBD.

The DL OTOH needs some veteran experience and skill.

Back up QB might be a area we make a move but Powell is off the table now. I'm not sure if we were speaking with him or who the next choice MIGHT be? I guess Crum might be one we consider.

I guess: Vaval - Nichols - Allen - Holm - Moxey

Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on February 01, 2026, 06:04:33 PM
Quote from: M.O.A.B. on February 01, 2026, 06:00:13 PMI guess: Vaval - Nichols - Allen - Holm - Moxey



I don't think they'll want to use Vaval as a full time starter at DB. It's not that he can't play there but he's too valuable as our returner.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 01, 2026, 06:20:22 PM
Quote from: M.O.A.B. on February 01, 2026, 05:57:38 PMQB Maier to Ottawa

Maier reunites with Dinwiddie from his early years in Calgary, might be good.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: bunker on February 01, 2026, 06:25:14 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 01, 2026, 06:20:22 PMMaier reunites with Dinwiddie from his early years in Calgary, might be good.
They clearly aren't 100% confident Brown is their answer, whether due to durability, play, or both.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 01, 2026, 06:55:47 PM
Quote from: bunker on February 01, 2026, 06:25:14 PMThey clearly aren't 100% confident Brown is their answer, whether due to durability, play, or both.

I think Dinwiddie gives Brown first dibs, but depending on injury and performance he could end up playing Maier quite a bit.  If Brown flunks out, better chance he heads back to Wpg. next season.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: theaardvark on February 01, 2026, 07:30:31 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 01, 2026, 06:55:47 PMI think Dinwiddie gives Brown first dibs, but depending on injury and performance he could end up playing Maier quite a bit.  If Brown flunks out, better chance he heads back to Wpg. next season.

If Brown flunks out, why in the world would you want him to return?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on February 01, 2026, 07:33:51 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on February 01, 2026, 07:30:31 PMIf Brown flunks out, why in the world would you want him to return?

Because we saw him be successful here and Ottawa is where everyone goes to die.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on February 01, 2026, 07:42:24 PM
Dustin Crum agrees to terms with Montreal.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 01, 2026, 08:26:55 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on February 01, 2026, 07:42:24 PMDustin Crum agrees to terms with Montreal.

Displaces Shea Patterson and Caleb Evans.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on February 01, 2026, 08:49:46 PM
Houston to the Lions. Lofton to the TiCats.

I'm not quite sure why we didn't re-sign Houston, so we're going to see 2 new CB's this year. Maybe Bonds will be healthy but that's a real iffy thought at the moment.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: VictorRomano on February 01, 2026, 08:53:41 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 01, 2026, 08:49:46 PMHouston to the Lions. Lofton to the TiCats.

I'm not quite sure why we didn't re-sign Houston, so we're going to see 2 new CB's this year. Maybe Bonds will be healthy but that's a real iffy thought at the moment.

Isn't Moxey a CB?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on February 01, 2026, 08:56:05 PM
Quote from: VictorRomano on February 01, 2026, 08:53:41 PMIsn't Moxey a CB?


Yes but we released Parker earlier so still have a question mark for the other one. Some interesting candidates but starter is a TBD.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on February 01, 2026, 09:00:04 PM
Maybe Houston didn't really like the system. He's an aggressive corner and being told to stay high and cover triple moves all season can't have been his ideal scenario nor what he's particularly good at.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on February 01, 2026, 09:04:25 PM
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on February 01, 2026, 09:00:04 PMMaybe Houston didn't really like the system. He's an aggressive corner and being told to stay high and cover triple moves all season can't have been his ideal scenario nor what he's particularly good at.

I guess it doesn't matter whether we choose or he choose. Ironically the Lions have Bridges as well.

However adding Ceresna should mean opposing QB's won't have as much time for receivers to run routes.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on February 01, 2026, 09:07:03 PM
I'm not sure one way or the other whether Vaughters is testing free agency or whether we've decided to spend the SMS.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 01, 2026, 09:21:57 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 01, 2026, 08:56:05 PMYes but we released Parker earlier so still have a question mark for the other one. Some interesting candidates but starter is a TBD.

I was pretty happy with Dexter Lawson's versatility, he filled in at HB, CB and SAM, hopefully they keep him around, not everyone gets signed day one of FA.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on February 01, 2026, 09:31:09 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 01, 2026, 09:04:25 PMI guess it doesn't matter whether we choose or he choose. Ironically the Lions have Bridges as well.

However adding Ceresna should mean opposing QB's won't have as much time for receivers to run routes.

If we play a system that lets him.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: gobombersgo on February 01, 2026, 09:44:17 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 01, 2026, 08:49:46 PMHouston to the Lions. Lofton to the TiCats.

I'm not quite sure why we didn't re-sign Houston, so we're going to see 2 new CB's this year. Maybe Bonds will be healthy but that's a real iffy thought at the moment.

I dont mind seeing some of the new faces coming to camp battling for open positions.

How boring would training camp be if all the starting positions were pre-determined. We all know the Bombers normally dont cut veteran players after training camp.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on February 01, 2026, 09:58:35 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 01, 2026, 08:49:46 PMHouston to the Lions. Lofton to the TiCats.

I'm not quite sure why we didn't re-sign Houston, so we're going to see 2 new CB's this year. Maybe Bonds will be healthy but that's a real iffy thought at the moment.

Apparently once we signed Moxey, we were out on Houston, so he moved on.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on February 01, 2026, 10:02:27 PM
Quote from: Jesse on February 01, 2026, 09:58:35 PMApparently once we signed Moxey, we were out on Houston, so he moved on.

I don't know if that is 2+2=4. Like I mentioned we don't know what the plan is for the 2nd CB. We also didn't know until today that we'd get Moxey. We could have still lost Houston anyway. We're talking hours here. I think the decision was made to not bring Houston back before today, but that's just an opinion on my part.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on February 01, 2026, 10:32:58 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 01, 2026, 10:02:27 PMI don't know if that is 2+2=4. Like I mentioned we don't know what the plan is for the 2nd CB. We also didn't know until today that we'd get Moxey. We could have still lost Houston anyway. We're talking hours here. I think the decision was made to not bring Houston back before today, but that's just an opinion on my part.

Just relaying what I read from one of the Winnipeg reporters.

I think Taylor Allen from the free press is the one that suggested that was the case.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 01, 2026, 10:34:29 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 01, 2026, 10:02:27 PMI don't know if that is 2+2=4. Like I mentioned we don't know what the plan is for the 2nd CB. We also didn't know until today that we'd get Moxey. We could have still lost Houston anyway. We're talking hours here. I think the decision was made to not bring Houston back before today, but that's just an opinion on my part.

I have no opinion on Moxey but have never been that impressed with any Tiger Cats DB's.  It could be he's more of a leader than Houston was, don't know.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: DCM on February 01, 2026, 11:01:10 PM
@danralphcp
Hearing a new agreement in principle for veteran DB Demerio Houston. The 29-year-old American has a deal with Ottawa after B.C. withdrew its earlier offer. Houston was in five games last year with Winnipeg but has 14 career picks in 50 contests with Winnipeg and Calgary.

@danralphcp
Only if offer is registered. Appears that one hadn't been yet
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: DCM on February 01, 2026, 11:23:28 PM
@TSNDaveNaylor
The agreement to terms between the @REDBLACKS and returner James Letcher is no-more. A hazard of the communication window is where deals are agreed-upon but not always immediately put on paper. He remains a free agent. #CFL
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blueforlife on February 02, 2026, 02:58:42 AM
James Vaughters agrees to terms with Saskatchewan Roughriders: sources - 3DownNation https://share.google/Fitv4ekpCWeUBUUU4
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on February 02, 2026, 12:25:13 PM
Quote from: DCM on February 01, 2026, 11:23:28 PM@TSNDaveNaylor
The agreement to terms between the @REDBLACKS and returner James Letcher is no-more. A hazard of the communication window is where deals are agreed-upon but not always immediately put on paper. He remains a free agent. #CFL

Letcher to the Riders.

https://3downnation.com/2026/02/01/saskatchewan-roughriders-agree-to-terms-with-american-returner-james-letcher-jr-sources/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on February 02, 2026, 02:38:10 PM
Riders have released Cdn. kicker Brett Lauther.

https://3downnation.com/2026/02/02/saskatchewan-roughriders-release-longtime-kicker-brett-lauther/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: LXTSN on February 02, 2026, 03:55:49 PM
Quote from: Blueforlife on February 02, 2026, 02:58:42 AMJames Vaughters agrees to terms with Saskatchewan Roughriders: sources - 3DownNation https://share.google/Fitv4ekpCWeUBUUU4
I think moving on from him is a good move. We gotta be able to develop some new talent at that position to save costs. Ceressna also will play a bunch of DE. I think we run with 3 DE and Canadian DT on passing downs anyway.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on February 02, 2026, 03:57:25 PM
Brissett to the Stamps

Dejon Brissett has reached a deal to join the Calgary Stampeders, TSN's Farhan Lalji reports.

The 29-year-old wide receiver is coming off the best season of his career, posting 65 catches for 907 yards and three touchdowns with the Toronto Argonauts last season.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 02, 2026, 05:15:41 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on February 02, 2026, 02:38:10 PMRiders have released Cdn. kicker Brett Lauther.

https://3downnation.com/2026/02/02/saskatchewan-roughriders-release-longtime-kicker-brett-lauther/

Someone will pick Lauther up, he's not done and once he rejuvenates mentally he'll provide solid kicking for another 4-5 years.  We've seen it here with both Lirim and Leggio, great patience is required when managing kickers.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: theaardvark on February 02, 2026, 06:49:28 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 02, 2026, 05:15:41 PMSomeone will pick Lauther up, he's not done and once he rejuvenates mentally he'll provide solid kicking for another 4-5 years.  We've seen it here with both Lirim and Leggio, great patience is required when managing kickers.

Not too sure about that, except as an in season injury replacement.

Lauther didn't just have repeated cases of yips, he's also not the deepest kicker.  72.2% last year...
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Pigskin on February 02, 2026, 06:54:43 PM
Riders have had a rough FA so far.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: TrueBlue75 on February 02, 2026, 07:01:48 PM
Duquoy announced his retirement from football as per the CFL social media.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: blue_or_die on February 02, 2026, 07:14:00 PM
Quote from: TrueBlue75 on February 02, 2026, 07:01:48 PMDuquoy announced his retirement from football as per the CFL social media.

https://3downnation.com/2026/02/02/longtime-montreal-alouettes-defensive-back-marc-antoine-dequoy-retires-from-cfl/ (https://3downnation.com/2026/02/02/longtime-montreal-alouettes-defensive-back-marc-antoine-dequoy-retires-from-cfl/)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: theaardvark on February 02, 2026, 07:37:32 PM
Wow, shocker.  But playing FS the way he did takes a toll.  Loeffler was a prime example,when you come downhill and thump, you pay a price.

Its too bad, he was fun to watch.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: blue_gold_84 on February 02, 2026, 07:44:38 PM
Marc-Antoine Dequoy Announces Retirement (https://www.cfl.ca/2026/02/02/marc-antoine-dequoy-announces-retirement-from-football/)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 02, 2026, 07:45:08 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on February 02, 2026, 07:37:32 PMWow, shocker.  But playing FS the way he did takes a toll.  Loeffler was a prime example,when you come downhill and thump, you pay a price.

Its too bad, he was fun to watch.

He's got other fish to fry, apparently quite a celebrity in Quebec he'll probably make more money on the other side of football.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: bluebeard on February 02, 2026, 08:34:13 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on February 02, 2026, 06:54:43 PMRiders have had a rough FA so far.
I agree.  They could have a hard time this season in making the playoffs.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 02, 2026, 09:05:44 PM
Quote from: bluebeard on February 02, 2026, 08:34:13 PMI agree.  They could have a hard time this season in making the playoffs.

I think they'll do well as long as Trevor Harris stays healthy and that's the key to their season.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blueforlife on February 02, 2026, 11:04:56 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 02, 2026, 09:05:44 PMI think they'll do well as long as Trevor Harris stays healthy and that's the key to their season.
He is good but not carry a team good.  Too early to know what the Riders will be but I expect all teams in the West to be decent and plenty of parity.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on February 03, 2026, 07:28:57 AM
Quote from: TrueBlue75 on February 02, 2026, 07:01:48 PMDuquoy announced his retirement from football as per the CFL social media.

This is crazy.  It's also crazy that he's 31?  I thought he was like 4 years out of college -- like 26-27.  Basically quitting at/near his peak.

There were ~3 hits he took in '25 that I vividly remember, where a carrier plowed him.  I think 2 he got concussed to some degree.  He's a scrawny, tall guy, way wimpier than Loffler ever was, and he should not be doing those hits.  He's a pure rover and pass interceptor -- should never have been tasked with stopping much bigger RBs.  I wouldn't use him uphill at all.  He should always be tackling from behind or ball-hawking.  Maybe he should have been a corner.

Oh well.  On the bright side, now no one gets him and the unfair (talent + passport) advantage he brings.

He wasn't on our team, but I'll miss him.  He was great fun to watch.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on February 03, 2026, 07:31:12 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 02, 2026, 05:15:41 PMSomeone will pick Lauther up, he's not done and once he rejuvenates mentally he'll provide solid kicking for another 4-5 years.  We've seen it here with both Lirim and Leggio, great patience is required when managing kickers.

Nah, he's not a H<many J's> or even a Leggs.  He's a Milo who wasn't really ever very good and had many stints of struggles.

The other 2 guys kind of had the yips for a season but then bounced back.  (Leggs is still unproven IMHO.)

So the question is... who is going to be kicking in SSK now??  I'll LOL if whoever they roll with stinks worse than Lauther.  But like Milo, SSK seems to have a penchant for unreliable K's.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on February 03, 2026, 07:36:29 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 28, 2026, 06:43:04 PMRiders re-sign KeeSean Johnson, the Rider receiving corps. is now eating up a lot of their SMS budget.

The crown jewel of FA25 RECs.  No mention of price?  But whisper is it's a ton?  I hope so!  Best hands of any Rider in a long time.  Really bummed we didn't have a chance to snag him.  Astounding inside route player.

I didn't know he was NFL and made $2M, but that totally jives with what I see on-field.

Only risk is his recent injury history.  If he had played in the post-season then those games wouldn't have even been close.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 03, 2026, 07:26:37 PM
Quote from: Tecno on February 03, 2026, 07:31:12 AMNah, he's not a H<many J's> or even a Leggs.  He's a Milo who wasn't really ever very good and had many stints of struggles.

The other 2 guys kind of had the yips for a season but then bounced back.  (Leggs is still unproven IMHO.)

So the question is... who is going to be kicking in SSK now??  I'll LOL if whoever they roll with stinks worse than Lauther.  But like Milo, SSK seems to have a penchant for unreliable K's.

Riders were test driving Lauther replacements all last season, he's probably already in house.  Half Lauther's value lies in his passport, he's a middle of the pack FG kicker, as are Paredes and Lewis Ward now.  As for Leggs, he's become a machine kicking in the most difficult stadium in the CFL, last year he made 92.9% of his FG's.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on February 03, 2026, 09:15:47 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on February 02, 2026, 07:44:38 PMMarc-Antoine Dequoy Announces Retirement (https://www.cfl.ca/2026/02/02/marc-antoine-dequoy-announces-retirement-from-football/)
Wow, big hit to montreals defense!!
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on February 03, 2026, 09:26:44 PM
McManis released by Toronto. Yikes. Didn't see that coming. Hamilton looking to sign him.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on February 03, 2026, 10:08:09 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 03, 2026, 09:26:44 PMMcManis released by Toronto. Yikes. Didn't see that coming. Hamilton looking to sign him.
Wow, what's Toronto thinking, he IS their defense!! It would be totally ironic if arch enemy Hamiton signs him.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: GOLDMEMBER on February 03, 2026, 10:49:45 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 03, 2026, 09:26:44 PMMcManis released by Toronto. Yikes. Didn't see that coming. Hamilton looking to sign him.
Wow, only there very best player! He'd look great here, lol
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on February 03, 2026, 11:08:34 PM
Quote from: GOLDMEMBER on February 03, 2026, 10:49:45 PMWow, only there very best player! He'd look great here, lol

I guess contract negotiations came to a standstill. Bombers don't have a particular need to upgrade at LB but he's a top tier LB.

I think we may still have some SMS left but the potential free agent is down to 90 and not many players I see we might want.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on February 03, 2026, 11:36:45 PM
Well, I didn't think we'd go out and get a LT, but the best one in the league was available.

I don't think we need another LB but...
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 04, 2026, 12:25:43 AM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 03, 2026, 11:08:34 PMI guess contract negotiations came to a standstill. Bombers don't have a particular need to upgrade at LB but he's a top tier LB.

I think we may still have some SMS left but the potential free agent is down to 90 and not many players I see we might want.

A lot of teams are discovering they don't have to spend a lot to sign decent LB's, there is more supply than demand.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Stats Junkie on February 04, 2026, 06:33:02 AM
PavCo announced a new lease proposal for the Vancouver Whitecaps. It would see PavCo profits flow back to the team, estimated at $1.5 million.

Although not mentioned in this article, Ravi Kahlon mentioned that a similar deal would be available for the BC Lions as well.


https://globalnews.ca/news/11650990/bc-government-deal-vancouver-whitecaps/ (https://globalnews.ca/news/11650990/bc-government-deal-vancouver-whitecaps/)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on February 04, 2026, 06:42:34 AM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 03, 2026, 11:08:34 PMI guess contract negotiations came to a standstill. Bombers don't have a particular need to upgrade at LB but he's a top tier LB.

I think we may still have some SMS left but the potential free agent is down to 90 and not many players I see we might want.

I have no idea how we could have any SMS left at all, once you factor in all the ELCs we still need to fill / re-sign / draft.  I think we blew the wad and are probably going to be over (absent creative MMM).

As for McManis... we could make the scheme work if he becomes MLB and Jones to WILL, with Jones/McManis/Wilson all rotating.

Our run D would go up 3X if we had that brick house in the middle...
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on February 04, 2026, 01:44:32 PM
Quote from: Tecno on February 04, 2026, 06:42:34 AMI have no idea how we could have any SMS left at all, once you factor in all the ELCs we still need to fill / re-sign / draft.  I think we blew the wad and are probably going to be over (absent creative MMM).

As for McManis... we could make the scheme work if he becomes MLB and Jones to WILL, with Jones/McManis/Wilson all rotating.

Our run D would go up 3X if we had that brick house in the middle...


It's been pointed out that many feel we used a bunch of 2025 SMS to pay many of our extensions.

I was against re-signing K. Wilson and possibly shifting away from Ayers. I think there is a way to sign McManis and fit into the SMS but I don't think he'll be on our radar.

For that matter I think he's a better choice that T. Jones but I don't know how many would agree.

Teams don't plan to spend all their SMS before TC. They budget with the expectation of not going over the SMS each year.  2024 was a bit of an exception with what happened with the Lions. Bombers only went over by $30K more or less and that was due to activating a bunch of PR players for the last game.

Every team is still re-signing or signing players from other teams today. I won't be surprised if we add a couple more during free agency etc.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: VictorRomano on February 04, 2026, 02:40:34 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 04, 2026, 01:44:32 PMFor that matter I think he's a better choice that T. Jones but I don't know how many would agree.


Tony Jones was literally the second-best tackler in the league in 2025.  The only guy better than him was Micah Awe.  Although he was injured, McManis was 22nd on the list.

https://www.cfl.ca/stats?stat_category=defence&filter[season][eq]=2025&group_by=player
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on February 04, 2026, 02:47:05 PM
Quote from: VictorRomano on February 04, 2026, 02:40:34 PMTony Jones was literally the second-best tackler in the league in 2025.  The only guy better than him was Micah Awe.  Although he was injured, McManis was 22nd on the list.

https://www.cfl.ca/stats?stat_category=defence&filter[season][eq]=2025&group_by=player

A tackle made after a one yard gain counts the same on the stat sheet as a tackle made after a 15 yard gain.

But it doesn't mean the same thing.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: VictorRomano on February 04, 2026, 03:20:30 PM
Quote from: Jesse on February 04, 2026, 02:47:05 PMA tackle made after a one yard gain counts the same on the stat sheet as a tackle made after a 15 yard gain.

But it doesn't mean the same thing.

That argument doesn't really hold water when you look at the team defensive stats in conjunction with individual stats. Winnipeg's D was ranked #3 against the rush, giving up 1694yds (an average of 5.01/rush) and allowing 13 rushing TDs against and only giving up 94.1yds/game, and Toronto's D was ranked second-last against the rush, giving up 1903 yds (5.21/rush) and 105.7yds/game, allowing 19 rushing TDs....

Winnipeg's rush D was better, because our LBs were better.  We all know our D line or DBs weren't responsible for those numbers last year....
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on February 04, 2026, 04:13:15 PM
Quote from: VictorRomano on February 04, 2026, 03:20:30 PMThat argument doesn't really hold water when you look at the team defensive stats in conjunction with individual stats. Winnipeg's D was ranked #3 against the rush, giving up 1694yds (an average of 5.01/rush) and allowing 13 rushing TDs against and only giving up 94.1yds/game, and Toronto's D was ranked second-last against the rush, giving up 1903 yds (5.21/rush) and 105.7yds/game, allowing 19 rushing TDs....

Winnipeg's rush D was better, because our LBs were better.  We all know our D line or DBs weren't responsible for those numbers last year....

Not really arguing with you, just pointing out that the # of tackles isn't a great indicator of talent.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on February 04, 2026, 04:36:08 PM
Quote from: VictorRomano on February 04, 2026, 03:20:30 PMThat argument doesn't really hold water when you look at the team defensive stats in conjunction with individual stats. Winnipeg's D was ranked #3 against the rush, giving up 1694yds (an average of 5.01/rush) and allowing 13 rushing TDs against and only giving up 94.1yds/game, and Toronto's D was ranked second-last against the rush, giving up 1903 yds (5.21/rush) and 105.7yds/game, allowing 19 rushing TDs....

Winnipeg's rush D was better, because our LBs were better.  We all know our D line or DBs weren't responsible for those numbers last year....

Part of that was due to QB's having a long time to throw and having success passing. It's an evasive stat. It's been mentioned that Jones is not great in pass coverage. It's also a reflection of how well or badly our front 4 played.

Regardless IMO McManis is a better player and more expensive. We have other areas in greater need of upgrading.

McManis was paid $231K ( highest in CFL ) in 2025. Jones was paid $126K. Take it for what it's worth and the fact we don't know how much either will earn in 2026.

Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 04, 2026, 04:44:36 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 04, 2026, 01:44:32 PMIt's been pointed out that many feel we used a bunch of 2025 SMS to pay many of our extensions.

I was against re-signing K. Wilson and possibly shifting away from Ayers. I think there is a way to sign McManis and fit into the SMS but I don't think he'll be on our radar.

For that matter I think he's a better choice that T. Jones but I don't know how many would agree.

Teams don't plan to spend all their SMS before TC. They budget with the expectation of not going over the SMS each year.  2024 was a bit of an exception with what happened with the Lions. Bombers only went over by $30K more or less and that was due to activating a bunch of PR players for the last game.

Every team is still re-signing or signing players from other teams today. I won't be surprised if we add a couple more during free agency etc.

It will be interesting to see if they continue to use the 1 game to stash players as much as they did last season, without an increase in roster size it seems like a reasonable tool to protect and retain players they don't want to send to the PR.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on February 04, 2026, 05:20:08 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 04, 2026, 04:44:36 PMIt will be interesting to see if they continue to use the 1 game to stash players as much as they did last season, without an increase in roster size it seems like a reasonable tool to protect and retain players they don't want to send to the PR.
[/quote
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 04, 2026, 04:44:36 PMIt will be interesting to see if they continue to use the 1 game to stash players as much as they did last season, without an increase in roster size it seems like a reasonable tool to protect and retain players they don't want to send to the PR.

I'd say no. If there is an argument that we're already tight against the cap it would be self destructive. We probably hide a few players short term on the 1 game IR but nothing like in 2025.

It's likely we have more rookies on the overall rosters compared to last year. The players we signed recently will be starters and not parked like Logan or Mitchell last year. At worst they experience some actual injuries requiring short or long stay on IR.

No chance we park Broxton for someone like Randolph if he's not actually nursing an injury, as an example.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: jayrock on February 04, 2026, 05:24:35 PM
Quote from: bluebeard on February 02, 2026, 08:34:13 PMI agree.  They could have a hard time this season in making the playoffs.
Riders are fine, it is a hard year. Lots of starters that were hurt and replaced by back ups are back, so what do you do, good starter's with good back ups the got you to the cup. Can not keep them all. Neild got his chance because of injury, and he stood out, so good for him to sign and get some more money most likely with the bombers.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: blue_gold_84 on February 04, 2026, 05:29:33 PM
The title tax is real. No team is immune to that.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: BBRT on February 04, 2026, 06:05:09 PM
Quote from: GOLDMEMBER on February 03, 2026, 10:49:45 PMWow, only there very best player! He'd look great here, lol

Just saw the notice that he signed with the TigerCats!
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: blue_gold_84 on February 04, 2026, 06:09:49 PM
Ti-Cats sign LB McManis (https://www.cfl.ca/2026/02/04/tiger-cats-sign-linebacker-wynton-mcmanis/)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: blue_gold_84 on February 04, 2026, 06:19:28 PM
Riders sign LB Woods (https://www.cfl.ca/2026/02/04/riders-sign-linebacker-josh-woods/)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on February 04, 2026, 08:56:28 PM
Quote from: dd on February 03, 2026, 10:08:09 PMWow, what's Toronto thinking, he IS their defense!! It would be totally ironic if arch enemy Hamiton signs him.
Perfect!! Ticats vs Argos rivalry just got better!!
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on February 11, 2026, 04:35:35 PM
Ottawa make AJ Allen highest paid LB in CFL. 
Allen received a $60,000 signing bonus to ink the deal, it's worth $240,000 in hard money for 2026 and $250,000 in 2027. That totals $490,000 in hard money over the two-year term along with an additional $12,000 available in incentives. (Source 3downnation)
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on February 11, 2026, 05:14:00 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on February 11, 2026, 04:35:35 PMOttawa make AJ Allen highest paid LB in CFL

That's insane.  But, I guess, NAT ratio-buster, eh?  Is the dude smart or was someone else next to him "the QB of the D"?
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on February 11, 2026, 05:20:46 PM
Many players are signing big new $$ contracts. No problem. It's related to the increased SMS and top players are getting most of it.

Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 11, 2026, 06:27:47 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 11, 2026, 05:20:46 PMMany players are signing big new $$ contracts. No problem. It's related to the increased SMS and top players are getting most of it.



Yah not such a bad thing, if the veteran receiver gets paid an average of $150k it will make the CFL more attractive to college players that fall short of the NFL.  Same goes for salaries across the board, multi-season veteran players should make more than $120k.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on February 11, 2026, 07:01:43 PM
Bombers re-sign Hallett. I wasn't expecting that but he's a good ST player. Can't keep everybody.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 11, 2026, 07:14:42 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 11, 2026, 07:01:43 PMBombers re-sign Hallett. I wasn't expecting that but he's a good ST player. Can't keep everybody.

Must have accepted base level ST salary, hopefully he can stay healthy as he always adds a spark.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on February 11, 2026, 08:25:06 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 11, 2026, 07:01:43 PMBombers re-sign Hallett. I wasn't expecting that but he's a good ST player. Can't keep everybody.

I knew it, and I like it.  He has a special skill set.  Yes, the fact it took forever does hint we got him at a good deal.  I bet ELC + small bump ($15k?).  Mafia won't force a guy back to ELC just because they can...

And there's still a chance some DPs beat him out in TC.  Puts some more pressure on Ball, too.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Blue In BC on February 11, 2026, 08:30:58 PM
Quote from: Tecno on February 11, 2026, 08:25:06 PMI knew it, and I like it.  He has a special skill set.  Yes, the fact it took forever does hint we got him at a good deal.  I bet ELC + small bump ($15k?).  Mafia won't force a guy back to ELC just because they can...

And there's still a chance some DPs beat him out in TC.  Puts some more pressure on Ball, too.


I never thought it would be expensive to re-sign him. He adds some good skills on ST's. At this time of year it's just a question of where does everybody fit in. The team has many good ST players.

We have 29 or 30 Canadians on the roster. We'll draft another 7 or 8. A few may end up on the IR. Another few will end up on the PR. Some will never make it past their 1st TC.

He might push either Kelly or Ball off the roster or new draft choice might beat out one of the 3.  Kelly has had the least productivity, so he might be the guy having the most to prove. He also has an injury history each year since being drafted.


Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on February 11, 2026, 08:46:58 PM
Edmonton Elks sign Woodmansey, highest paid OL in the CFL.

https://3downnation.com/2026/02/11/official-edmonton-elks-make-coulter-woodmansey-highest-paid-offensive-lineman-in-cfl-salary-cap-era/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on February 11, 2026, 08:48:04 PM
Edmonton Elks sign Carney, highest paid American defensive player in the CFL.

https://3downnation.com/2026/02/11/official-edmonton-elks-make-malik-carney-highest-paid-american-defensive-player-in-cfl-salary-cap-era/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on February 11, 2026, 10:10:42 PM
Wow, Edmonton 1oses Ceresna to us, on1y to poach Carney off the Riders...who did the Riders rep1ace Carney with?? as we11 as Micah Johnson with?? that's 2 HUGE pieces of their D 1ine gone
 
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Pete on February 12, 2026, 01:39:33 AM
Quote from: dd on February 11, 2026, 10:10:42 PMWow, Edmonton 1oses Ceresna to us, on1y to poach Carney off the Riders...who did the Riders rep1ace Carney with?? as we11 as Micah Johnson with?? that's 2 HUGE pieces of their D 1ine gone
 
they picked up Vaughtner from us (and Adams), but they also lost Baldanado who was impressive, and I don't believe they signed Shane Ray , so they really only have left Rose and Sanders.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on February 12, 2026, 01:40:45 PM
Ottawa makes Jake Maier highest paid backup QB in the CFL.

https://3downnation.com/2026/02/11/official-ottawa-redblacks-make-jake-maier-highest-paid-backup-qb-in-cfl/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on February 12, 2026, 04:20:49 PM
Hamilton signs Cdn. receiver Gittens Jr.

https://3downnation.com/2026/02/12/hamilton-tiger-cats-sign-canadian-receiver-kurleigh-gittens-jr-sources/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on February 12, 2026, 05:32:54 PM
QuoteOttawa makes Jake Maier highest paid backup QB in the CFL.

https://3downnation.com/2026/02/11/official-ottawa-redblacks-make-jake-maier-highest-paid-backup-qb-in-cfl/
Where's Dustin crumb playing??
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: blue_gold_84 on February 12, 2026, 05:36:46 PM
Quote from: dd on February 12, 2026, 05:32:54 PMWhere's Dustin crumb playing??

Crum signed with the Alouettes (https://en.montrealalouettes.com/2026/02/10/quarterback-dustin-crum-signs-with-alouettes/) on Tuesday.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on February 12, 2026, 05:39:04 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on February 12, 2026, 05:36:46 PMCrum signed with the Alouettes (https://en.montrealalouettes.com/2026/02/10/quarterback-dustin-crum-signs-with-alouettes/) on Tuesday.
Dang, I was hoping we'd bring him here. Does that mean MBT is out in Montrea1??
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: blue_gold_84 on February 12, 2026, 05:54:30 PM
Quote from: dd on February 12, 2026, 05:39:04 PMDang, I was hoping we'd bring him here. Does that mean MBT is out in Montrea1??

He's a free agent.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: dd on February 12, 2026, 10:49:31 PM
Is that our #2 Qb??
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on February 13, 2026, 05:41:16 AM
Quote from: Ridermania on February 11, 2026, 08:46:58 PMEdmonton Elks sign Woodmansey, highest paid OL in the CFL.

Isn't Woodmansey the C in HAM that was snapping over the head of BLM all the time?  The Huddle show seemed to indicated so.  So that means he'll maybe be changed to OG?  Unless Cody wants balls thrown 30Y behind him?

Seems like a weird guy to make "highest paid".  EDM in desperation mode?  Plus, since Woodmansey was still on the shelf, wouldn't his ask have to come down a bit?  I guess the only guys left now are guys who are sticking to their "ask the world" guns, and guys who will have to take lowballs.  Well, and guys who will retire out.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 13, 2026, 06:05:58 PM
Quote from: Tecno on February 13, 2026, 05:41:16 AMIsn't Woodmansey the C in HAM that was snapping over the head of BLM all the time?  The Huddle show seemed to indicated so.  So that means he'll maybe be changed to OG?  Unless Cody wants balls thrown 30Y behind him?

Seems like a weird guy to make "highest paid".  EDM in desperation mode?  Plus, since Woodmansey was still on the shelf, wouldn't his ask have to come down a bit?  I guess the only guys left now are guys who are sticking to their "ask the world" guns, and guys who will have to take lowballs.  Well, and guys who will retire out.


According to 3DN Woodmansey was the best Natl. O-line available in FA, they acknowledged he wasn't near the best Natl. O-lineman, but numerous teams were interested in picking him up so Hervey had to pay the price.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: blue_gold_84 on February 13, 2026, 08:04:51 PM
5 big-play free agent receivers still available (https://www.cfl.ca/2026/02/13/5-big-play-free-agent-receivers-still-available/)

In no specific order:

Dalton Schoen
Shawn Bane Jr.
Dominique Rhymes
Steven Dunbar Jr.
Charleston Rambo
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on February 13, 2026, 08:16:06 PM
Elks release OL Martez Ivey.

https://3downnation.com/2026/02/13/edmonton-elks-release-former-all-cfl-west-division-selection-martez-ivey/
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on February 13, 2026, 09:00:20 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on February 13, 2026, 08:04:51 PMDalton Schoen
Shawn Bane Jr.
Dominique Rhymes
Steven Dunbar Jr.
Charleston Rambo


Dunbar/Rambo if cheap.  Schoen if healthy/cheap.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 13, 2026, 09:40:04 PM
Quote from: Tecno on February 13, 2026, 09:00:20 PMDunbar/Rambo if cheap.  Schoen if healthy/cheap.

Sounds like Walters is willing to talk to Schoen when he feels he's ready, might see him back in town for  medical testing or a tryout late summer.  Doubt he's interested in starting over elsewhere.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on February 18, 2026, 11:59:07 AM
Steven Dunbar Jr. just announced his retirement from football.   
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Ridermania on February 20, 2026, 02:36:15 PM
Dominique Rhymes is calling it a career after 8 years in the CFL. 
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Jesse on February 20, 2026, 03:22:05 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on February 20, 2026, 02:36:15 PMDominique Rhymes is calling it a career after 8 years in the CFL. 

Was never quite able to live up to expectations.

Enjoyed watching him play though.
Title: Re: CFL (Non-Bombers) off-season news
Post by: Tecno on February 20, 2026, 10:45:54 PM
Only 8 years?  I would have guessed more than 10!  His best years were in BC with to Burnham.  Lots of threats those years.  He was legit those years, and could rip you a new one.