I only seen Parker go down which appeared to be his leg?
Vaughters went down but came back
Strev took a few big shots and looked a little shakey but fought it off
Who am I missing?
I'm not sure why Kelly was seen on defence so often. I don't know if that was the result of an injury which I didn't see or just part of a new strategy in rotation.
Parker was the only injury that might keep a player out that I saw. Even then it might have been precautionary and why Kelly was seen getting defensive reps.
Quote from: Blue In BC on August 03, 2025, 06:55:17 PMI'm not sure why Kelly was seen on defence so often. I don't know if that was the result of an injury which I didn't see or just part of a new strategy in rotation.
Parker was the only injury that might keep a player out that I saw. Even then it might have been precautionary and why Kelly was seen getting defensive reps.
Seemed to be in the rotational plan even before Parker was injured, as early as the Q1 saw Kramdi make a tackle along the sidelines from the SAM position.
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on August 03, 2025, 07:22:47 PMSeemed to be in the rotational plan even before Parker was injured, as early as the Q1 saw Kramdi make a tackle along the sidelines from the SAM position.
Not a bad idea to see if he's up for the safety role, I guess.
I seen what looked like double safety schemes
Agree could be a way to get him some live reps / evaluate him for safety
Didn't seam to hurt us
I'm not sure Parker is really bad. Ya he was writhing a lot, but the friendly-fire hit was a bit of a glancing blow and Parker was not planted.
He did have his legs kind of tangled up in a weird way, but still, because he was loose/free in the air any hit was partially absorbed by his body just moving to match it.
That's why I asked if a glancing blow like that when you're not planted can possibly cause a hammy?? Does anyone know?
3Q11:45 (for my reference)
Quote from: TecnoGenius on August 04, 2025, 07:06:53 AMI'm not sure Parker is really bad. Ya he was writhing a lot, but the friendly-fire hit was a bit of a glancing blow and Parker was not planted.
He did have his legs kind of tangled up in a weird way, but still, because he was loose/free in the air any hit was partially absorbed by his body just moving to match it.
That's why I asked if a glancing blow like that when you're not planted can possibly cause a hammy?? Does anyone know?
3Q11:45 (for my reference)
Bad enough to use a crutch today.
Quote from: theaardvark on August 05, 2025, 03:14:14 AMBad enough to use a crutch today.
So hammy or the same knee as last time? Bad luck. Not helpful to his continued employment...