Bomber Free Agents

Started by Pigskin, October 18, 2026, 09:41:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Tecno

Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on October 19, 2026, 05:16:31 PMIt seems clear in their eyes Elsbury has replaced Vanterpool, I'm not sure what that decision is based on as Elsbury hasn't demonstrated versatility or great ability yet.

But Vant is the backup OT.  Els is not.  Els is C and maybe backup OG.  Thus you need both on the PR or AR.
 
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on October 19, 2026, 05:16:31 PMThe off-season should determine if they stick with the 3 Natl. O-line or seek major personnel upgrades, at most I expect 2 alterations to the existing O-line. Should have forced Stan out last season and retained Randolph as he was the definition of adequate at RT.

I think we retain flexibility to field the best OLmen we have with no regard to ratio, in terms of what nationality gets that 3rd spot.  Let the best man win.  If it's Eli at C, fine; Els at C, fine; rookie at C, fine; new $280k NAT C, fine.

Yes, I would seek to upgrade Stan, Els/Eli, Wallace.  Broxton to LT.  Neuf stays.  If Eli or Wallace want to stay as PR or 6th, great; if not: Vibert.
Never go full Johnston!

Tecno

Quote from: tlf on October 19, 2026, 05:14:37 PMHow much of these player's defensive woes is on Younger? Would they thrive on other teams with better schemes like others have? Just a thought.

Yes, the beefy and younger front-7, and faster younger DBs, would look way better on other teams with "normal" schemes.

Jones & Smith would be smashing runs dead in other schemes.  Holm, Major, and even Vaval would be hawking 3-5 INTs a season each on other teams; as well as actually making disruptions at point of catch rather than coming in after the fact.

All of the DL would be getting way more sacks because there'd be more blitz help, and much more innovative and effective stunts and delays.

The whole D is crippled by the soft-zone, give-up-the-d&d, give-up-the-wide-out, vacate-the-flat, no-blitz Younger scheme.

The morale must be unfathomably diseased at this point.  That's why I expect to see some freelancing and "playing the play" in this next game.  Full mutiny.
Never go full Johnston!

Tecno

Quote from: Blue In BC on October 19, 2026, 02:32:59 PMGauthier retired after 2025 when he was 33 years old. Hallett turns 33 at the end of this year. I agree Hallett can still play at a good level.

The issue is roster size and players drafted in 2026 and those that will be drafted in 2027.  We also added Novak , Clark and Boulianne in 2026. Overall that's 5 2026 draft choices on the roster.

Then one would assume they've planned for Hallett to retire this FA or next.  Boulaine is one I'd keep an eye on as the next big ST thing.  He's starting to stand out to me.  However, he's more a LB than DB, right?  If you drop Hallett you really need a replacement who's a DB or tweener.

Who out of all the AR/PR ST NATs fits that bill?  (Ignoring Kelly who is already a guaranteed dress.  Maybe Stuart?)
Never go full Johnston!

Blue In BC

#18
Quote from: Tecno on Today at 07:10:32 AMThen one would assume they've planned for Hallett to retire this FA or next.  Boulaine is one I'd keep an eye on as the next big ST thing.  He's starting to stand out to me.  However, he's more a LB than DB, right?  If you drop Hallett you really need a replacement who's a DB or tweener.

Who out of all the AR/PR ST NATs fits that bill?  (Ignoring Kelly who is already a guaranteed dress.  Maybe Stuart?)

I think Stuart showed well in pre season. He was playing quite a bit as a " starter " during the exhibition games. He seems to have speed and some raw talent to be developed. Ball is the other one I mentioned as a depth replacement

Boulianne is more LB than DB.
One game at a time

Blue In BC

#19
Quote from: Tecno on Today at 07:01:20 AMBut Vant is the backup OT.  Els is not.  Els is C and maybe backup OG.  Thus you need both on the PR or AR.
 
I think we retain flexibility to field the best OLmen we have with no regard to ratio, in terms of what nationality gets that 3rd spot.  Let the best man win.  If it's Eli at C, fine; Els at C, fine; rookie at C, fine; new $280k NAT C, fine.

Yes, I would seek to upgrade Stan, Els/Eli, Wallace.  Broxton to LT.  Neuf stays.  If Eli or Wallace want to stay as PR or 6th, great; if not: Vibert.


Vanterppol could be back but just as easily leave on his own for a stronger chance to not end up on the PR.

Poncious has been here since TC and he might be the guy fighting to start or land on the PR.

It's a double sword question with the expectation that we'll replace Bryant. So we need a new RT and PR depth.

He's only made the AR for 9 games in 3 seasons and hasn't landed a more prominent role. He was part of the team in 2024.
One game at a time