DB Controversy?

Started by Tecno, August 29, 2026, 06:30:19 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

tlf

I'm not comfortable with Vaval playing a ton of D..some yes, but I do not want him injured.  You know how we were without a good returner.  Am I wrong to feel this way?  I'll admit, I have not paid attention to how he is on defence.  I did like Texada last night though.

Blue In BC

Quote from: Tecno on August 29, 2026, 02:34:14 PMWhen? I'm at the second and 30 part of the 3rd. I've been looking and haven't seen him. However, tsn makes it very hard to track every d set... As you are well aware of.

So you think he was in on passing down set with the cover 2 and cover 3 looks? Whose spot was he taking, if any? Was he looking competent?

I'll be able to find what you saw, I'm sure. Just haven't yet.

I gave you the example of great coverage on Philpot. A couple of other times he was also at CB. Who he replaced or exactly why is less obvious, but he was on the field making plays.
One game at a time

Throw Long Bannatyne

Quote from: Blue In BC on August 29, 2026, 05:40:31 PMI gave you the example of great coverage on Philpot. A couple of other times he was also at CB. Who he replaced or exactly why is less obvious, but he was on the field making plays.

What number was Texada?

Blue In BC

Quote from: tlf on August 29, 2026, 03:41:12 PMI'm not comfortable with Vaval playing a ton of D..some yes, but I do not want him injured.  You know how we were without a good returner.  Am I wrong to feel this way?  I'll admit, I have not paid attention to how he is on defence.  I did like Texada last night though.

You aren't wrong but football is a risky sport. Vaval played a few games at CB last year and I thought he looked pretty good. His speed can make up for coverage errors.

I'm not saying he's the next T. Ford, but what if he is capable of becoming a top CB. A player on the field as a starter on defence could be more important than a returner.

I also mentioned that we haven't seen what Womack can do as a returner. Nobody knew who Vaval was before he joined the team as the primary returner.

Now neither of those questions / statements may pan out that way. OTOH what are our current alternatives?

I'd prefer not having to use him on defence but he is an outstanding athlete. Let's hold our breath and see how he does against the Riders and / or until we have a different choice.
One game at a time

Blue In BC

One game at a time

Jesse

Rosters are too small to have a dedicated returner. They should be fulfilling another role.
My wife is amazing!

Blue In BC

Quote from: Jesse on August 30, 2026, 01:42:17 AMRosters are too small to have a dedicated returner. They should be fulfilling another role.

They do as in game injury replacement depth. Only a few returners see a lot of action otherwise.
One game at a time

Tecno

Quote from: Jesse on August 30, 2026, 01:42:17 AMRosters are too small to have a dedicated returner. They should be fulfilling another role.

And yet when a team has a top-3 RET they are put in return-only (or at least return-mostly) duty.  It's been this way for years in the CFL.  Just like you find roster space for a top-3 K (wasting a DI), you do the same for returner.
Never go full Johnston!

Tecno

Quote from: tlf on August 29, 2026, 03:41:12 PMI'm not comfortable with Vaval playing a ton of D..some yes, but I do not want him injured.  You know how we were without a good returner.  Am I wrong to feel this way?  I'll admit, I have not paid attention to how he is on defence.  I did like Texada last night though.

Vaval has been remarkable at CB.  I think he has rapidly earning his way into starting, in a way that even though no one wants to do it, you just gotta because he's so good.

Ever since he got here MOS has been touting his appetite for learning and ability to absorb and apply the coaching.  That's a Mafia-type player for sure.  Texada will have to prove to be at least 75% as good to earn the spot.
Never go full Johnston!

Jesse

Quote from: Tecno on August 30, 2026, 07:05:19 AMAnd yet when a team has a top-3 RET they are put in return-only (or at least return-mostly) duty.  It's been this way for years in the CFL.  Just like you find roster space for a top-3 K (wasting a DI), you do the same for returner.

It seems like the top guys are the ones who are pressed into double duty, actually. Teams don't want to waste their top talent.

Chad Owens and Chris Williams come to mind.
My wife is amazing!

Waffler

Brandon Alexander told a story on the pregame. 2020, Gauthier running down Nick Marshall on a punt return. Shouldn't happen right? Well Nick Marshall was playing db and had covered 2 long routes just before the kick and admitted he didn't have enough left to make the end zone. That likely cost Sask a Grey Cup trip, we won it that year.

https://www.bluebombers.com/2020/11/09/10-pays-made-champion-unsung-hero-emerges/

I am 100% in favor of specialization.

BTW, congrats to Brandon Alexander on his new job, leaving the Bombers to teach school back home. 
"Don't cry and don't rage. Understand." ― Spinoza
__________________________________________________
Everything seems stupid when it fails.  - Fyodor Dostoevsky

Jesse

Quote from: Waffler on August 30, 2026, 03:50:53 PMBrandon Alexander told a story on the pregame. 2020, Gauthier running down Nick Marshall on a punt return. Shouldn't happen right? Well Nick Marshall was playing db and had covered 2 long routes just before the kick and admitted he didn't have enough left to make the end zone. That likely cost Sask a Grey Cup trip, we won it that year.

https://www.bluebombers.com/2020/11/09/10-pays-made-champion-unsung-hero-emerges/

I am 100% in favor of specialization.

BTW, congrats to Brandon Alexander on his new job, leaving the Bombers to teach school back home. 

Alternatively, maybe the STC should have been aware of that and had someone else back there - it's kind of his only job.
My wife is amazing!

Throw Long Bannatyne

Quote from: Jesse on August 30, 2026, 03:28:15 PMIt seems like the top guys are the ones who are pressed into double duty, actually. Teams don't want to waste their top talent.

Chad Owens and Chris Williams come to mind.

Kevin Fogg for awhile.

Throw Long Bannatyne

Quote from: Tecno on August 30, 2026, 07:16:36 AMVaval has been remarkable at CB.  I think he has rapidly earning his way into starting, in a way that even though no one wants to do it, you just gotta because he's so good.

Ever since he got here MOS has been touting his appetite for learning and ability to absorb and apply the coaching.  That's a Mafia-type player for sure.  Texada will have to prove to be at least 75% as good to earn the spot.


I wouldn't be surprised if Vaval asked for $150k on his next contract, if only for his return work, being a returner is now a full time and dangerous job worthy enough of investing in. Agree, he looks like he could establish himself as a DB as well but he's more valuable to the team as a returner.  Perhaps he'll dictate his own position when his ELC expires, but for now I expect he'll continue as an emergency back up.  Shuffling the secondary too much comes with the risk of increasing confusion and mixups, so they'll want to keep that to a minimum if they decide to go with Texada instead.

DM83

No controversy.
Nichols can go to Ottawa
TEXADA is the real deal.mgo get five more like him.
baba listen way better than any DB we have.  Go make one of thenNGL cuts our PReturner if need be., Hey Kelvin Cline. Pay him. He would be the best prospect we have.