Official Game Day Thread - Winnipeg @ Hamilton, July 5, 2026

[Throw Long Bannatyne]

Yes. It was easy to look good doing shorter passes too.  That was a good decision to keep it simple.  Had we let him loose and chucked it down field as some were calling for, you may have seen a few good throws but I suspect some bad as well.  We don't know.  He is new and needs more reps for sure before he is allowed to play big in a game. 

A single pick six and they would have lost the game, so they were very wise not to attempt to push the ball too far down field.

[The Zipp]

Are you serious? That was the worst display of quarterbacking I ve ever seen. Yes, Elgersma was better than ford and dolegla—-I can't believe either of these guys has a job in the cfl, they are horrible, just terrible, and it's not like it's their first kick at it. Hamilton is in serious trouble. As for our offense, I can't believe we won a football game when our offense was never in the red zone once during the entire game!! That was the worst display of offensive football I've ever seen at the professional level

the strev games last year were far worse.

[dd]

This game was on par with a strev game. We had a massive punt return and a jet sweep and that was our offense for an entire half, and up to that point we had scored 4 points and given up a pick six. 

Face it, it was a horrible game offensively and that was including when Collaros was in!! My god Dru brown will look like Tom Brady compared to this garbage!!

[Pigskin]

This game was on par with a strev game. We had a massive punt return and a jet sweep and that was our offense for an entire half, and up to that point we had scored 4 points and given up a pick six.

Face it, it was a horrible game offensively and that was including when Collaros was in!! My god Dru brown will look like Tom Brady compared to this garbage!!

We gave up a pick six??

[theaardvark]

Not having a declared #2 in Ham was a terrible idea, juggling them, bringing them off the bench cold repeatedly was terrible coaching, and e did not take advantage of that enough.

On the whole, we had a pretty good game, just good enough to win.

Jake Kelly had a surprising game, he made some good tackles, and blew up on teams.

Kramdi needs to be at SAM.

Big Stan is not the OT he was, he is getting beat pretty regularly.

4 int Olines in multiple games?  When has that happened before?  With WPG being one?  Yikes.

[Tecno]

Castillo with the glasses.

Is there a story to go with that?  My buddy made it sound like it was a storyline somewhere?  I missed it.

We joked that the reason Castillo was short was he got the glasses on for the first time, went out, and looked at the uprights and said "holy bleep that's far away!".  Or... he has high magnification and he thought they were 10Y closer than they really were.

In any event, I can't help but think of Sheen in Major League.

[Tecno]

That first throw and the pick was not on the line, all rushers were picked up, that was on Zach.

The INT was a result of us trying to force a short game that doesn't exist.  We did that "everyone goes 6Y and curls" scheme which I had just mentioned in the last couple of GDTs as always failing (yet always working for the opponent...).  That's one of the plays that helped lose us the '22 GC.

The strange part is, Zach put way more zip on this ball than he's usually able to.  But his wind up is still slow and he takes that extra tiny pump beforehand that gives that DB that extra moment to pounce.  And he wasn't staring it down for long, but he was just enough to tip his hand.

I think because they make that pass in practice against DBs not really trying at full speed, that they think they can make it work against a live D.

Just more indication our short game is total butt.  Zach has to look it off longer, avoid that final mini-pump, and find a way to wind faster.  Or we have to abandon every curl where the DB is within 5Y.

[ModAdmin]

[ModAdmin]

[Tecno]

Bye bye Stan

The Zach slaughter is not on Stan.  It was on Brady.  Stan did the right thing taken the innermost guy who otherwise would not be covered.  STAN DID NOTHING WRONG.  If Stan doesn't take the DE, then the DE would be free to the QB and take him out.

Instead of staying on the threat side, Brady goes to cover a guy that Broxton had redirected: accomplishing nothing..

This hit is 100% on Brady.  Sorry folks.

And Stan did recover the fumble, otherwise it's HAM ball.

Actually, if you look closely, we might be able to assign half the blame to Daniels.  Just before the snap, Brady points to the threat, and might even be saying something to Zach.  Brady then slaps his left thigh.  The only one who could have seen that in this scheme is Daniels, who was behind Brady pre-snap.  But by the time Brady slaps his thigh Daniels is already committed to his FB-sneaks-out route, at the line, and can't see it.

But Brady can't abandon the protection on this side until he's pretty sure rookie Daniels knows what's going on.  He's probably reacting to the 3-on-2 on the RG/RT, and the 3-on-3 on C/LG/LT, but he needs to recognize RT is playing wider and that side is less of a threat -- not to mention, the left side is the "blind" side.

What a poop show all 'round.  But don't blame Stan.  He did the right thing.

[Tecno]

if a hit like that ends zach for the game time to move on

a) That hit has always ended Zach's game since he came here.  This isn't new.
b) We always take him out as a precaution -- and I think he likes it that way.
c) We all know the drill, "upper body", later "head" or "neck", he misses 0 to 2 weeks and then comes back.

If it was "time to move on" because of this hit, we should have "moved on" 4 seasons ago, because literally nothing is different.