Stop being run first

Started by Tecno, July 01, 2026, 01:28:34 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Tecno

I say we stop being a run first, run mostly team. It hasn't worked for about 2 years. We don't have the OL horses. And Brady isn't AH33.

The argument, in a nutshell, is illustrated by the first play of our second last drive vs EDM. We're ahead, we need to kill clock. Brady gets stuffed for maybe a gain of 3. Now we're 2nd and long and we botch it.

How many times in 2025 and this year have we seen this? Grey cups too.

I think we, and Brady, would do better if we ran more like Montreal, sask, or Hamilton. They don't go to the run on most first downs. They keep you guessing. Then the run comes when you're so used to the pass, and their mediocre backs get bigger yards.

They have structured their O to get enough short pass yards on first to not be in 2nd and long most of the time.

Unless Broxton rapidly becomes Yoshi, and Wallace becomes Dobson, and Brady AH33, we're just wasting a down, especially at critical moments.
Never go full Johnston!

Waffler

Pass protect not been that great either. Imagine having Bryant and Hardrick in their prime again. That was bully ball. Everyone knew what we were going to do but it made no difference. Now we will have to be less predictable.
"Don't cry and don't rage. Understand." ― Spinoza
__________________________________________________
Everything seems stupid when it fails.  - Fyodor Dostoevsky

Blue In BC

Mostly agree. Our runs are too often predictable. Teams know when we'll run and we're an inside run team. The OL is certainly part of the problem but even when we were better, it was not uncommon to see BO stuffed.

No one else sees the ball on a run play very often. Demski every now and then. Collaros is not longer a threat to run or escape the pocket.

That said I think you're being a bit harsh. Offence includes the passing game and as discussed the change to a 3 Canadian receiver and 3 import OL has not proven to be completely successful.

There are several issues.
One game at a time

dd

Biggest issue is our O line stinks. Run or pass, they aren't getting the job done. Broxton has been a bust

Blue In BC

Quote from: dd on July 01, 2026, 01:51:14 PMBiggest issue is our O line stinks. Run or pass, they aren't getting the job done. Broxton has been a bust

If that's true then the brain trust needs an overhaul.
One game at a time

dd

 We continue to be outplayed on both sides of the ball, out D line gets zero pressure and our O line can't run or pass both effectively. Our O line has never been the same since Yoshi left, and then Dobson, and our D line has never recovered since Jeffcoat retired. The game is tough when you're getting beat on both sides of the ball at the line.

RebusRankin

Quote from: Tecno on July 01, 2026, 01:28:34 PMI say we stop being a run first, run mostly team. It hasn't worked for about 2 years. We don't have the OL horses. And Brady isn't AH33.

The argument, in a nutshell, is illustrated by the first play of our second last drive vs EDM. We're ahead, we need to kill clock. Brady gets stuffed for maybe a gain of 3. Now we're 2nd and long and we botch it.

How many times in 2025 and this year have we seen this? Grey cups too.

I think we, and Brady, would do better if we ran more like Montreal, sask, or Hamilton. They don't go to the run on most first downs. They keep you guessing. Then the run comes when you're so used to the pass, and their mediocre backs get bigger yards.

They have structured their O to get enough short pass yards on first to not be in 2nd and long most of the time.

Unless Broxton rapidly becomes Yoshi, and Wallace becomes Dobson, and Brady AH33, we're just wasting a down, especially at critical moments.

Zach isn't at a point of his career where we should make him the focal point. We don't have the WR talent to make it a focal point.

Tecno

Quote from: RebusRankin on July 01, 2026, 05:48:33 PMZach isn't at a point of his career where we should make him the focal point. We don't have the WR talent to make it a focal point.

Zach is still a better, more dynamic QB than T.Harris.  And T.Harris and his O are arguably the best or 2nd best in the league right now.  If you had to pick who is in the cup right now, it's SSK v HAM.  (EDM will fade away, as always.)

My point is, if T.Harris can look like a world beater using a 90% short game... why can't we?  Can't blame the RECs, SSK often started 4 NAT RECs and still kicked butt.

Why aren't we re-imagining Zach's game like they did Trevor?  If we ran our run game more like SSK, we might do better too.  They run a lot, but still aren't a "run first, run mostly" team.
Never go full Johnston!

Tecno

Quote from: Blue In BC on July 01, 2026, 01:59:31 PMIf that's true then the brain trust needs an overhaul.

That's the gist of my "no preparation" "no planning" posts.  We're being out-schemed and out-coached by even Killam and the mediocres in EDM.

In another post I questioned Marty Costello's tenure.  He's the common thread throughout the massive continual OL decline since ~2022.  He has supposedly best-in-league Broxton, human tank Wallace, and seemingly-capable Elsbury added this past 1-2 seasons and the result is... whatever you call our OL so far in 2026.

Watch what all the other OLs are doing!  With far less name recognition than our line has!  It makes me cry watching EDM's OL dominate in every aspect.  Well-oiled machines are many other OLs.  Sad.
Never go full Johnston!

Tecno

Quote from: Blue In BC on July 01, 2026, 01:44:49 PMMostly agree. Our runs are too often predictable. Teams know when we'll run and we're an inside run team. The OL is certainly part of the problem but even when we were better, it was not uncommon to see BO stuffed.

Maybe that's half the problem.  You watch EDM when they suspect (more like know!) we are going to run.  All 7 stuff between the tackles.  Maybe someone feigns covering the C or D gap, but not really: they crash down on the box pretty quickly.

Everyone knows Brady won't kick it outside when the gaps are filled.  He may squirt through the B or C and kick outside if he gets through, but he never attacks the open air outside where all the players are.

It's the complete opposite of what Rankin does, or even Oullette or Scott.  Everyone else sees the stuffed holes and kicks it out -- they gamble on a -1 vs a 20Y romp: Brady takes the sure 1-3 into a stuffed box every time with zero chance of 20.

That said, it may be HC/OC direction forcing him to do this.  He may literally be told "never kick it outside, just get the 1-3Y".  We can't know.  If so, this goes back to the braintrust issues.

Quote from: Blue In BC on July 01, 2026, 01:44:49 PMThere are several issues.

Of course, and this is one aspect.  But one critical aspect, because we are league-renowned for being "run first, run mostly" "the O runs through Brady".  And no, it won't be easy to change, especially mid-season.  We won't suddenly get an unstoppable quick pass game like SSK -- that takes an entire off-season and half an in-season to achieve.
Never go full Johnston!

Tecno

We are also somehow giving away that we are going to run.  Even we don't run on every first down, or to start every series.  Watch the EDM game.  Watch the EDM LBs.  There are some plays where they cheat up more, like they know we are going to run with 90% certainty.

And there are others where it's 1st down or 1st play or whatever and you'd suspect WPG will run... but the LBs don't cheat up as much or are quicker to bounce back into coverage.

It's very noticeable.  And they are right 90-100% of the time.  It's bizarre, and I'm not making this up, go watch.

This means they somehow KNOW we are going to run.  And they KNOW when we aren't going to run.  Pre-snap, or during early motion.  And that means our set, or motion, or some tell, is giving away that THIS IS A RUN.  Something is telling them "ignore the playfake, and the motion, and load the box to stop Brady in the A or B gap".

This is a major problem and probably why our run game stinks.  They've identified tells on film.  This means we aren't disguising things properly, or our sets are too obvious, or the other players aren't selling their threat.

Yes, other teams can do this, and it's normal, but not at the rate of success that EDM was having.  They were so good at sniffing out the run, KNOWING Zach wasn't going to drop back to pass instead.

The only thing I saw that surprised them was a sweep, which we fake on may runs.  They still loaded the box, but their LBs are athletic enough to redirect when they suss it out and still stop us for a mediocre gain.  This needs to be fixed if our runs are to succeed.
Never go full Johnston!