Blue Bombers agree to terms with veteran defensive lineman Jake Ceresna

Started by DCM, February 01, 2026, 06:46:11 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

theaardvark

Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 05, 2026, 07:36:06 PMHe had 1 sack in 11 games last year, strong he is, fast he ain't.  Pretty sure he cycles into the DT rotation in place of Woods and DE's will be chosen from a different pile.

Here he runs over Stanley, this must have been his only sack.


Not sure you watched the video you posted... Jake is definitely playing DE in this clip, walking right over Big Stan to Collaro's blind side.
Unabashed positron.  Blue koolaid in my fridge.  I wear my blue sunglasses at night.  Homer, d'oh.

Blue In BC

Quote from: theaardvark on February 05, 2026, 09:47:14 PMNot sure you watched the video you posted... Jake is definitely playing DE in this clip, walking right over Big Stan to Collaro's blind side.

He's capable of playing DE at times but it depends on the QB he's playing against. I wouldn't want to see him trying to do that against Rourke or VAJ for example.  Collaros is more of a sitting duck in that sense and is not going to run around and by most DE's. 
One game at a time.

Throw Long Bannatyne

Quote from: theaardvark on February 05, 2026, 09:47:14 PMNot sure you watched the video you posted... Jake is definitely playing DE in this clip, walking right over Big Stan to Collaro's blind side.

Well as a DE he wasn't very effective, he got through to the QB one time in 11 games.

Jesse

Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 05, 2026, 10:55:22 PMWell as a DE he wasn't very effective, he got through to the QB one time in 11 games.

He was injured all last season. He's been one of the premier pass rushers in the CFL for like 5 years.
My wife is amazing!

dd

No kidding, the man's a force to be reckoned with and has been for years. I just hope his knee prob1ems are behind him.

GCn19

Quote from: Blue In BC on February 05, 2026, 10:26:57 PMHe's capable of playing DE at times but it depends on the QB he's playing against. I wouldn't want to see him trying to do that against Rourke or VAJ for example.  Collaros is more of a sitting duck in that sense and is not going to run around and by most DE's. 

68.9% of his snaps in 2024 was at DE. He will definitely play both inside and out on our D but he excels at both. As a big man capable of playing DE he will likely play there in our 3 man fronts so that another big man can line up in the DT.
Some people take this forum way too seriously.

Jesse

Quote from: GCn19 on Today at 05:17:13 AM68.9% of his snaps in 2024 was at DE. He will definitely play both inside and out on our D but he excels at both. As a big man capable of playing DE he will likely play there in our 3 man fronts so that another big man can line up in the DT.

I expect a lot of what we'll see is Jefferson-Lawson-Ceresna, with Griffin/Woodbey as the extra defender.
My wife is amazing!

GCn19

Quote from: Jesse on Today at 10:59:35 AMI expect a lot of what we'll see is Jefferson-Lawson-Ceresna, with Griffin/Woodbey as the extra defender.

That would be my guess for a 3 man front as well. I expect that Ceresna will line up outside in the 4 man a fair deal. Ceresna can move for a big man and OTs are not used to being bullrushed by a 300 lber.
Some people take this forum way too seriously.

Blue In BC

Quote from: GCn19 on Today at 05:17:13 AM68.9% of his snaps in 2024 was at DE. He will definitely play both inside and out on our D but he excels at both. As a big man capable of playing DE he will likely play there in our 3 man fronts so that another big man can line up in the DT.

That may well be true but that was Edmonton and this is Winnipeg. Edmonton may have had a better interior of choices at DT. Winnipeg had squat and our need is / was at DT. The returning players from our PR are DE types. Most of the rookies we've signed are DE types. The only returning back up DL we have is Schmekel. Our DL is in full re-build mode with 3 departures.

Obviously players will line up at various spots. Depth charts are not written in stone but I suspect he'll be listed at DT. How many snaps he takes at DT or DE is going to depend on how well we recruit at DE and DT as variables. Defensive strategy comes into play.
One game at a time.

theaardvark

I don't care if they put him in at MLB. 

Just get him on the field.

He is legit Jefferson quality, and will give Willie some relief.  If he lines up at DT beside Willie, woe be that oline... and by extension, QB.

To heck with the blindside, I want them in the QB's face.
Unabashed positron.  Blue koolaid in my fridge.  I wear my blue sunglasses at night.  Homer, d'oh.

Throw Long Bannatyne

Quote from: GCn19 on Today at 05:17:13 AM68.9% of his snaps in 2024 was at DE. He will definitely play both inside and out on our D but he excels at both. As a big man capable of playing DE he will likely play there in our 3 man fronts so that another big man can line up in the DT.

Where did you get that precise number?  Now days it doesn't matter so much where they line up but DE's and DT's still have distinctly different responsibilities and dimensions, even though the jobs have morphed a bit, I see Ceresna as strictly a DT.

LXTSN

Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on Today at 05:38:36 PMWhere did you get that precise number?  Now days it doesn't matter so much where they line up but DE's and DT's still have distinctly different responsibilities and dimensions, even though the jobs have morphed a bit, I see Ceresna as strictly a DT.
It sort of makes sense.
On first downs, he would play more DE and they bulk up their interior, and then on second downs they replace a DT with another DE and move Ceresna to the middle. There's more 1st downs and 3rd and 1's, than there is 2nd and longs.

I see him moving around our d-line just like Willie does. Sometimes you want to seek out size or speed mismatches.
Ultimately, he's a fantastic pick up and wherever they put him, he's going to be a big upgrade!!