CFL announces changes to the game - merged topics

Started by The Zipp, September 21, 2025, 05:20:40 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Do you like the changes overall?

Yes
11 (22.4%)
No
38 (77.6%)

Total Members Voted: 49

Pete

To me a fundamental change would be addressing the use of excessive force on any player. This last weekend was a showcase of potential career ending hits.
 This would be eliminating shoulder as well as helmet hits.forcing tacklers to wrap up and tackle properly.

theaardvark

I'm all for moving forward, so long as the game changing changes don't change the game...
Unabashed positron.  Blue koolaid in my fridge.  I wear my blue sunglasses at night.  Homer, d'oh.

TBURGESS

Announce a major change for tomorrow. Fan bases spend a day debating which changes would be good and bad. Have the data to see if the change will go over big before the announcement. Change the announcement if needed. 
Winnipeg Blue Bombers - 2019 Grey Cup Champs.

theaardvark

Quote from: TBURGESS on September 22, 2025, 03:00:29 PMAnnounce a major change for tomorrow. Fan bases spend a day debating which changes would be good and bad. Have the data to see if the change will go over big before the announcement. Change the announcement if needed.

Here's the thing.

Any changes announced will have had to be vetted by owners and execs first.

You can't make these changes "on the fly" based on social media reaction.

That said, you can announce that you have a laundry list of ideas, and want to engage the fans in the debate/decision, and put out a survey to gauge fan support for the new ideas, and then based on that, come up with a plan that the execs/owners then vote on to approve.  Sort of a large scale focus group.

But leaving it up to social media to give recommendations got us Boaty McBoatface, so I'm not sure that's the optimal route. 
Unabashed positron.  Blue koolaid in my fridge.  I wear my blue sunglasses at night.  Homer, d'oh.

Blueforlife

Thanks for the votes and responses

The masses have spoken

Waffler

"I'm being told to prepare for an Americanization of the CFL game beginning in 2026," former Saskatchewan Roughriders play-by-play voice and now sports talk host Rod Pederson posted.
"Don't cry and don't rage. Understand." ― Spinoza
__________________________________________________
Everything seems stupid when it fails.  - Fyodor Dostoevsky

blue_gold_84

Quote from: Waffler on September 22, 2025, 03:36:39 PM"I'm being told to prepare for an Americanization of the CFL game beginning in 2026," former Saskatchewan Roughriders play-by-play voice and now sports talk host Rod Pederson posted.

Rod Pederson is human garbage.
#bushleague
лава Україні!
井の中の蛙大海を知らず
What a craptacular timeline.
Stewart Johnston is a villain.

Waffler

Quote from: peg_city on September 22, 2025, 12:29:03 PMI guess it really depends on what the changes are.

If we become a feeder to the NFL, I would actually like that. It would give me reason to watch the NFL.
but why would the NFL want a feeder league that doesn't play their rules?
"Don't cry and don't rage. Understand." ― Spinoza
__________________________________________________
Everything seems stupid when it fails.  - Fyodor Dostoevsky

theaardvark

Quote from: peg_city on September 22, 2025, 12:28:21 PM7 teams lost money

If they have solid data on how "Americanizing" the game will increase revenues, I'd give it an honest look.  And I would not fault owners/execs from doing so as well.

I do hope, however, that the revenue calculations include lost viewers/fans as well as gained viewers/fans.  Messing with 100years of tradition is going to lose people, for sure.  The gains have to outweigh the losses, and the gains have to be long term, because the losses were.
Unabashed positron.  Blue koolaid in my fridge.  I wear my blue sunglasses at night.  Homer, d'oh.

blue_gold_84

Quote from: theaardvark on September 22, 2025, 04:01:59 PMIf they have solid data on how "Americanizing" the game will increase revenues...

They won't have any such data. Becoming NFL Jr. is not the answer.
#bushleague
лава Україні!
井の中の蛙大海を知らず
What a craptacular timeline.
Stewart Johnston is a villain.

Waffler

What I'd like to see is salaries capped by position. You'd see a lot less player movement this way. It would help build fan loyalty by familiarity. Lawler for example, he's ours, not ours, ours again and now not ours.
"Don't cry and don't rage. Understand." ― Spinoza
__________________________________________________
Everything seems stupid when it fails.  - Fyodor Dostoevsky

Blue In BC

#101
Quote from: Waffler on September 22, 2025, 04:09:03 PMWhat I'd like to see is salaries capped by position. You'd see a lot less player movement this way. It would help build fan loyalty by familiarity. Lawler for example, he's ours, not ours, ours again and now not ours.

I don't think that would be legal or make any actual difference. Every team spends money a little differently. Depends on who you have or try to get. In the end the SMS is the SMS.
One game at a time.

gobombersgo


theaardvark

Quote from: Waffler on September 22, 2025, 04:09:03 PMWhat I'd like to see is salaries capped by position. You'd see a lot less player movement this way. It would help build fan loyalty by familiarity. Lawler for example, he's ours, not ours, ours again and now not ours.

A per player cap would be appropriate.  A QB making $700k+ while the best MLB makes 1/3 that is kind of unfortunate.

Maybe a player cap based on veteran status, the longer you are here the more you can make?  Doesn't mean Jake gets a raise, but he'd have the highest potential salary.  Players coming off ELC's wouldn't be able to break the bank, as all teams would have the same number they could match.
Unabashed positron.  Blue koolaid in my fridge.  I wear my blue sunglasses at night.  Homer, d'oh.