Quote from: Ridermania on Today at 07:24:08 PMLions make Hatcher, highest paid receiver in the CFL.
The BC Lions have signed 2025 All-CFL wide receiver Keon Hatcher Sr. to a two-year contract extension, the team announced on Wednesday.
The deal is worth a guaranteed $630K and includes a $125K signing bonus, according to TSN's Farhan Lalji, and makes Hatcher the highest-paid non-quarterback in the league.
https://3downnation.com/2025/12/03/b-c-lions-sign-top-cfl-receiver-keon-hatcher-to-multi-year-contract-extension/
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 01, 2025, 12:49:56 AMI have no idea if he has a legitimate chance of making it or not but having the opportunity to sign a CFL contract and make $500k+ per season within a couple of years if he's good enough might influence his thinking if he gets stuck on the hopeless NFL merry-go-round for a year or two like his brother did.Also, young Rourke, I believe, was picked in the 7th round of the NFL draft. Not a high draft pick, missed this season due to injury and will have to try to make the 49ers or some other team against higher QB picks in the 2026 dreaft. No doubt, in my mind, that he is getting input from his older brother and what went on for him. This should be interesting to watch.
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on Today at 03:46:06 PMThat looks like the same information I found here.
In 1973, FGs made up 23% of the scoring. In 1974, FGs made up 15% of the scoring.
I don't think I'd qualify a decrease of 8% over a tiny sample size of two seasons as being dramatic; in either instance, TDs made up the vast majority of scoring. I think there needs to be considerably more data in order to make a proper determination.
I'd also be hesitant to apply such a small dataset from another league from half a century ago. It begs the question if this change will be worthwhile, IMO. The CFL doesn't struggle with scoring as we see below:
From the 2027 season onward, we will no longer see missed FG returns, either. That's a unique entertainment aspect to the CFL that won't exist after next season.
Quote from: Tecno on Today at 07:03:29 AMTSN analysts don't make much either! The panel is always laughing about their pay.
Quote from: Tecno on Today at 06:58:25 AMPut me down in the "pigs must be flying" camp, too. This is insane. The only thing I can think of is he was kind of ousted by the owners. Maybe they got tired of losing and empty stands?
Or maybe the idea was he'd retire (he's getting quite old and haggard) and the old codger is doing the "I'm not dead yet!" routine.
My only question is: where are teams getting all the coaches cap space to hire all of these "advisors"? Same question to WFC with Hall/Jarius. I smell funny business. Huff goes from massive pay day head honcho in CGY to be lowly "advisor" in TOR at $100k (or whatever)? Explain how that makes sense.
Maybe "advisors" are outside the cap? That would make a lot of sense...
Quote from: bomber beetle on Today at 03:25:19 PMFinally, in 1974, the league pushed the goal posts back to the end line. The change was made mostly to encourage offenses to score touchdowns rather than field goals. The three-pointer had become an increasingly common occurrence by 1973. The move achieved the league's desired effect, field goals dropped from a total of 543 successful conversions off 861 attempts in 1973 to 335 field goals made on 553 attempts the following year.
https://www.profootballhof.com/blogs/2018/10/blogs-stories-from-the-pro-football-hall-of-fame-archives-evolution-of-the-game-goal-posts/