Quote from: Jesse on May 12, 2026, 11:23:14 AMAll that said, I think he would need to look significantly better than all the rookies coming in in order to beat them out. If the club didn't trust him last year when Zach was missing games left and right and Strev was a shell of his former self, why is that trust growing in the wake of multiple people brought in to stabilize the position?
Quote from: Tecno on May 12, 2026, 02:58:20 AMFor Wilson to be cut he has to be beaten out in 2 spots.
1. Someone has to show they can do SY at ~95%+ (possibly Elgersma?)
2. Someone has to show they can read a CFL D and execute the playbook and make completions (rookie camp whispers say this isn't Perkins)
#1 is the easier ask. Often just being tough & twitchy (& big) is enough. #2 usually only occurs later in season 2, or 3 or even 4. Perkins almost certainly can't do it this quickly. Elgersma may, if he's the next Rourke.
The fact he has to be beaten at both jobs to lose out leads me to bet he's not getting cut.
Quote from: Tecno on May 12, 2026, 03:20:30 AMI think we're trying to determine if Randolph is a PR spare or a cut. He has to beat out any IMP rookies we have in camp.
Rewatching the early '25 games it's clear that Griffin has a better nose in a lot of ways, and he can bring more wood than Kramdi. Kramdi got pasted sometimes in big run explosions. Griffin did better.
Since Allen didn't really wow anyone (except a few plays), the question of how best to deploy Kramdi is a valid one. The question isn't how good is Kramdi, it's how good is Allen at FS vs Griffin at SAM.
I think we're going to put a premium on run stop this season. I wouldn't be surprised if that means more beef & violence at every LB spot.