Quote from: Tecno on November 21, 2025, 05:49:20 AMWell, we were bound to get a good QB eventually. The team was improving with Biggie & AH onboard. Nichols was pivotal, and arrived at exactly the right time.
His game was far ahead of Fajardo's by '18-'19 (his last years here). And Cody went on to get that cup, etc.
Quote from: BlueFire on November 21, 2025, 12:20:08 AMWho else is old enough to remember when his name was Ralph Brock ? LOL Early in his career he would throw a shot put over and over. Hence the cannon arm.
Quote from: Jesse on November 22, 2025, 02:45:16 AMI don't really care if there's a bunch of fireworks.
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 22, 2025, 04:12:52 PMWho are these monster DTs??? In reality they don't exist, DT is fundamentally a grinder position, paying them $150k more per season isn't going to spur their performance, Same goes for the O-line, doesn't matter if they have one highly paid outstanding player as the O-line is only as good as it's weakest link.right now dt free agents include..


Quote from: RebusRankin on November 22, 2025, 02:40:13 PMZach is 16-14, 34 td passes, 31 ints the past two seasons. He has struggled as much as VAJ and BLM did.
Quote from: Tecno on November 22, 2025, 01:53:37 AMCody was the victim of losing "musical chairs" -- everyone had and was happy with their choice of starting QB. Cody will never be known as anything but a MBT/Arbuckle "very good backup" level QB. Even if he should be known as more in some people's eyes, it's not reality.
Quote from: Tecno on November 22, 2025, 02:36:43 AMYa, whenever I see the practice schedules/times I'm always doing a double-take... like these guys get paid hundreds of thousands and only practice for 1h 17mins or whatever a day? And here I thought these guys would be putting in 7 hours of practice a day -- especially when they are sucking and really need it (see: WPG O in '25).
How does can a DP ELC NAT ever get better? It seems so stupid.
Quote from: Tecno on November 22, 2025, 03:34:08 AMNo, this would be in addition to fixing the O. Yes, the O needs major work. Yes, the O was our main problem in '25. But the good thing there is there's already huge budget allocated for the O (compared to the D).
If you could get 1-2 monster DTs plus 2-3 new monster OL, and no other changes, I think we'd be back to GC form. Not saying that's all we should do, but those would make an instant impact.
Quote from: Tecno on November 22, 2025, 07:25:38 AMBut we don't need the fast WR type. Pokey is that, Wheatie is that, Mitchell is that (though he's probably gone-zo), even Demski is that. The big thing we lacked was the middle/crosser good-hands bruiser type. Not sure who would best fit that role (and will be in FA), but that's what we need most.