Main Menu

Recent posts

#1
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on Today at 06:05:17 PMLook at this this way, has it hurt? That is, are less Canadians watching because of it? No.

Is there a better chance of international viewership with an international program? Yes.

If the argument is that we need to mandate Canadians to play for Canadian fans to support the league then wouldn't the same be true for those elsewhere in the world. Also yes.

You either buy into that ratio or you don't don't.

I'd rather both be gone but here we are. 

It only hurts in the sense that it takes away positions for Canadian players. At the max 2 per team and 3 on the PR.
#2
Quote from: Pete on Today at 04:54:51 PMlooks like teams are starting to think that way
       2025                                        .3036
1. Dequoy @ $161K safety        Allen     275
2. T.Campbell @ $163K CB        Ford      236
3. Kramdi @ $151K SAM           Kasantois 205
4. Metchie @ $145K safety       Campbell  200
5. Katsantois @ $147K safety    Kramdi    185
Cdn starters are not cheap but your right still better than paying 300k for a Woodmansey

It's relative to the position though. 300k for Woodmansey when we handed out 260k to Broxton. 185k for Kramdi vs. 175k for Holm.

Just draft the best players you can. The draft is enough of a crapshoot without trying to deal with positional value.
#3
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on Today at 05:37:24 PMHave to wonder What are the residual benefits of the Global program?  There is no lack of Canadian talent to fill these positions, so it's not related to a shortage of supply.  Is CFL viewership or gambling revenue up in any of these countries, have contracts been signed?  Initially Ambrosie indicated there would be benefits for Canadian players playing football in foreign countries, but I haven't heard a peep about those opportunities in 6 long years.

Look at this this way, has it hurt? That is, are less Canadians watching because of it? No.

Is there a better chance of international viewership with an international program? Yes.

If the argument is that we need to mandate Canadians to play for Canadian fans to support the league then wouldn't the same be true for those elsewhere in the world. Also yes.

You either buy into that ratio or you don't don't.

I'd rather both be gone but here we are. 
#4
Quote from: Blue In BC on Today at 03:02:49 PMSure but we see players born in the USA with Canadian parents designated as Nationals. Why doesn't that concept apply to global players?  That may be the current rule but it's in conflict when players like Woli are designated as Canadians because of parentage.

I don't know whether Maltos or Castillo had a Canadian parent but it's an interesting question about global designations.

Seems ironic that to get a 2nd global on the AR it comes at the cost of a Canadian on the roster but he can't replace a Canadian to play.

I'm neither suggesting or wanting that to happen but it is a self imposed restriction. We don't need all these multiple conditions.

Having said all that, the best option is having both a kicker and punter roles filled by a global under the current ratio premise.

Have to wonder What are the residual benefits of the Global program?  There is no lack of Canadian talent to fill these positions, so it's not related to a shortage of supply.  Is CFL viewership or gambling revenue up in any of these countries, have contracts been signed?  Initially Ambrosie indicated there would be benefits for Canadian players playing football in foreign countries, but I haven't heard a peep about those opportunities in 6 long years.
#5
Quote from: Pete on Today at 04:54:51 PMlooks like teams are starting to think that way
1. Dequoy @ $161K safety        Allen     275
2. T.Campbell @ $163K CB        Ford      236
3. Kramdi @ $151K SAM           Kasantois 205
4. Metchie @ $145K safety       Campbell  200
5. Katsantois @ $147K safety    Kramdi    185
Cdn starters are not cheap but your right still better than paying 300k for a Woodmansey

Yet they tell us 7 out of 9 teams are losing money??? Spending more usually fixes that problem.
#6
Quote from: Blue In BC on Today at 01:35:59 PMLook at the other top paid Canadian DB's in 2025:

1. Dequoy @ $161K safety
2. T.Campbell @ $163K CB
3. Kramdi @ $151K SAM
4. Metchie @ $145K safety
5. Katsantois @ $147K safety

There were many import OL paid more than any of those players. Obviously all of these number went up but top OL are in a higher bracket.

That's why I suggested drafting a Canadian DB would be better for the SMS whether he gets retained after his ELC or not compared to a Canadian OL.


 The draft rankings show 3 in the top 20 but IDK whether they play CB's, DB's, safeties or SAM.


looks like teams are starting to think that way
       2025                                        .3036
1. Dequoy @ $161K safety        Allen     275
2. T.Campbell @ $163K CB        Ford      236
3. Kramdi @ $151K SAM           Kasantois 205
4. Metchie @ $145K safety       Campbell  200
5. Katsantois @ $147K safety    Kramdi    185
Cdn starters are not cheap but your right still better than paying 300k for a Woodmansey
#7
Quote from: Jesse on Today at 01:51:16 PMMaltos was born and raised in Mexico and went to a Mexican college.

Castillo was born and raised in Texas going to an American college.

There's no confusion or skirting rules in either definition.


Sure but we see players born in the USA with Canadian parents designated as Nationals. Why doesn't that concept apply to global players?  That may be the current rule but it's in conflict when players like Woli are designated as Canadians because of parentage.

I don't know whether Maltos or Castillo had a Canadian parent but it's an interesting question about global designations.

Seems ironic that to get a 2nd global on the AR it comes at the cost of a Canadian on the roster but he can't replace a Canadian to play.

I'm neither suggesting or wanting that to happen but it is a self imposed restriction. We don't need all these multiple conditions.

Having said all that, the best option is having both a kicker and punter roles filled by a global under the current ratio premise.
#8
Offside Forum / Re: Winnipeg Jets Discussion -...
Last post by Pigskin - Today at 02:36:59 PM
Helle didn't look good on the Ducks 3rd. and 4th goals. The OT goal was week also. Boys are done, lets get this trade train rolling.

#9
Its funny reading about the comments from players leaving the Riders. Its never about the Money, (To which I call BS)
Its they didnt talk to me, I was disrespected, I wanted s team that wanted me.
Meanwhile they are the highest paid in their position
(Sound familiar..)
#10
Offside Forum / Re: Winnipeg Jets Discussion -...
Last post by JockitchwithRich - Today at 02:08:29 PM
Early 2-0 lead had most things looking very positive but alas
the Ducks kept flying around and youthful legs took over.
Gotta say that HellB though strong still let in a couple of bad

Back to back games where Stanley chewed major minutes. Last night he went over 28 minutes and played quite well.

Scheif might have tweaked something in a leg and seemed to limp in OT and the end.  While Names went down early in game and never returned.