Quote from: dd on February 05, 2026, 11:05:04 PMI think both wi11 move around on the 1ine so teams can't just doub1e the edges or chip b1ock with the RB. Offense is going to setup and then the D 1ine wi11 setup and attack. It's not going to be the straight rush 3 BS from 1ast year, we can ATTACK now. Not sure if Thomas knows what or how to generate pressure from the 1ine
Quote from: Pigskin on Today at 04:43:07 AMMcCaffery wins come back player of the year. 1202 yards rushing, and another 924 yards receiving. After season ending Achilles tendinitis, and PCL injuries.
Quote from: TBURGESS on Today at 02:38:22 PMThat's your opinion; now prove it.It's not negative to point out facts.
Going over the SMS is a red herring. Teams have a choice in December of where to put the bonus money. Once last year's SMS is gone, they would put it into 2026.
Quote from: Jesse on Today at 02:25:00 PMEvery contract which we've seen the details of has included a sigficant signing bonus. Up to half the total value of the deal.Now that's the way to state an opinion.
It's not a huge leap to assume the same of our December deals. Especially considering the circumstances.
Quote from: GCn19 on Today at 12:42:12 PMWe saved substantial SMS for 2026 in December. We signed most of our bonus heavy players in that time and they had pretty big signing bonuses that were paid. The reason those deals were done early was to use up 2025 SMS. Walters hinted at that in the interview he gave.That's your opinion; now prove it.
Quote from: Blue In BC on Today at 01:16:32 PMI'll stick with the probability that many have mentioned. I think that you are just being negative.It's not negative to point out facts.
Yes going over the SMS is a valid question as it relates to teams that re-signed players in December that appear to have significant early bonus money. It's all part of the evaluation.