Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on Today at 01:33:17 PMOr they could do both. Perhaps that's some of the rationale behind smaller fields that fit the footprint of more stadiums?
They should be trying to grow the game in Canada.
Tney should be trying to grow the game globally.
Suggesting you ignore "the world" and go after Saskatoon and Brandon doesn't play well in the board room. Go ahead and suggest that and see what happens.
Quote from: Blue In BC on Today at 01:22:11 PMThe market place is not outside of North America. The global program is a failure. Taking time is one thing but I'd have to see a curve showing any impact over time. I'd have to see some games broadcast in Europe or Australia.
IMO the reality is that most global players seem to have Australian heritage since they are the kickers.
The CFL could play pre season games in the US even if they have to play on a different type of field.
Or:
They could play all pre season games in Canada outside the normal market. Saskatoon, Brandon, London, Halifax, Victoria for example.
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on Today at 02:13:53 AMAardvark is right on this one.
And without the global program what is the plan to try and generate interest in non traditional markets?
Haven't heard a better one.
Again, I'd do away with the ratio yesterday if I could. But if we're going to have one under the theory that it generates interest, then it makes sense to apply the theory everywhere.
It is certainly better than doing nothing and being all out of ideas. Which is how the league operated for long enough to get itself into trouble to begin with.





