Main Menu

Recent posts

#1
Offside Forum / Re: Winnipeg Jets Discussion -...
Last post by blue_gold_84 - Today at 08:28:37 PM
Per MoneyPuck, their playoff odds are now at 4.5% after yesterday's loss.

Just tank already. Embrace it!
#2
Offside Forum / Re: NHL Discussion (Other than...
Last post by Pigskin - Today at 08:17:37 PM
Quote from: JockitchwithRich on Today at 07:27:22 PMSo the airwaves are full of the Goudas knee on Matthews
and how no teammate challenged Gudas for it

Matthews to get an MRI and the guilty party a phone call from
NHL headquarters



It was dirty, he should at least 5 games.
#3
Offside Forum / Re: NHL Discussion (Other than...
Last post by JockitchwithRich - Today at 07:27:22 PM
So the airwaves are full of the Goudas knee on Matthews
and how no teammate challenged Gudas for it

Matthews to get an MRI and the guilty party a phone call from
NHL headquarters

#4
Offside Forum / Re: Winnipeg Jets Discussion -...
Last post by Pigskin - Today at 07:10:18 PM
I like Rosen. He good speed, and he likes to shoot the puck.
#5
Quote from: Tecno on Today at 08:14:00 AMHas Zach ever spent a whole 6G on the 6G when here?  I don't think so?  This is a track record over 5 seasons now.  Why not assume it continues?

Most I recall him doing is taking a head/neck whack and taking a couple/few games off.  Usually only 1-2 games, but that one time I think 4?

Personally, I'm not worried at all.  If it comes to it, we'll pull-another-Zach and splash trade for Powell or something.

Yes, 2019 the year he joined the Bombers after early season injury in Regina. He has been more suspect in getting shorter term injuries that seem to be accumulating. IIRC he was bumped out of 3 games in 2025 and missed 1 complete game in concussion protocol. Overall he only played in 13 games which included that 1st game suspension. Still he's not getting any younger. It's going to depend on the quality of our new OL.

Speculating on getting a replacement in trade is never an easy spot to be in. Teams may not want to trade. When a significant injury happens may be past trade deadline and many other reasons. Dropping in a new QB mid season not likely so save our bacon.

While I wouldn't want Masoli he's probably the most experienced and readily available coming off the coach.
#6
Quote from: Tecno on Today at 08:18:46 AMWell, to be fair, it's just 1 game, and though witches are often burnt based solely on the last playoff game, their performance does have to balanced against what they brought all year.

Dudes sometimes have just one bad game.

Kyrie probably had his best year since like '21, so I'd give him a pass.  And he brings that wise-old-vet experience MOS values.

Randolph is on thin ice though.  We'll often cut these IMP dev projects when they don't pan out.  He's clearly (to me) not any sort of future OT.  He might work at OG, and be a OT backup, but he's no Stan, Broxton, or Yoshi.  And what you need to win in this league is those guys at OT.


I was surprised we re-signed K. Wilson. He's no longer and exceptional LB. Age, injury history and SMS are all cumulative reasons. Signing Santos-Knox happened later and we have Woodbey and Ayers fighting for roster spots.

Wilson does add some experience as depth but is there room for him anywhere besides PR which I don't think he'd accept.

Randolph has been replaced at RT by Broxton. Going to a 3rd import OL is probable but we've added so many rookies, I think he's in trouble. Even Vanterpool is probably ahead of him at G?

Roster size and ratio make roster choices difficult.
#7
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on March 12, 2026, 05:02:32 PMI think Sterns was replaced by White not Nield, Sterns was effective inside and on quick hitters but was not much of a threat downfield due to his smaller size and Zach's inaccuracy on longer balls.

This is true only if we are going 3 NAT.  To me White is more the Wheatie/Mitchell replacement.  If White is the Sterns spot, then who is taking Wheatie?

If it's me I'm using White for the home-run ball and Nield inside on the big-body clutch punishments.

Ironically, probably our best deep shot in the ESF was Sterns in the EZ?  That was a beauty.
#8
Quote from: Blue In BC on March 12, 2026, 01:28:48 PMIf that analysis is correct then Randolph and K. Wilson should both be shown the door, possibly before TC.

Well, to be fair, it's just 1 game, and though witches are often burnt based solely on the last playoff game, their performance does have to balanced against what they brought all year.

Dudes sometimes have just one bad game.

Kyrie probably had his best year since like '21, so I'd give him a pass.  And he brings that wise-old-vet experience MOS values.

Randolph is on thin ice though.  We'll often cut these IMP dev projects when they don't pan out.  He's clearly (to me) not any sort of future OT.  He might work at OG, and be a OT backup, but he's no Stan, Broxton, or Yoshi.  And what you need to win in this league is those guys at OT.
#9
Quote from: theaardvark on March 12, 2026, 02:33:56 PMIf we do not have the "heir apparent" on the opening day roster, ready to take the reins should Zach go 6G, then we might as well just quit.

Has Zach ever spent a whole 6G on the 6G when here?  I don't think so?  This is a track record over 5 seasons now.  Why not assume it continues?

Most I recall him doing is taking a head/neck whack and taking a couple/few games off.  Usually only 1-2 games, but that one time I think 4?

Personally, I'm not worried at all.  If it comes to it, we'll pull-another-Zach and splash trade for Powell or something.
#10
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on March 12, 2026, 04:40:05 PMSeems like you're onto something, @Jesse. From the Feb. 12 presser.

I can't link the timestamp using the YouTube link feature, but that topic is covered at the 21:42 mark:

Ya, that's it.  Thanks for digging that up.  The "ya" he says isn't "yes we are doing this", it's more a "hmmmmm" vocalization.

Also, the "when the Elgersma thing is settled" is meaningless because is it settled now?  Will it be settled in a month?  6 months?  No one knows poop, not even Elgersma.

I also read into it more of "we'll examine our options then", not "we'll for sure hire a vet QB to be #2 at that time".  Plus, now FA is all done and all the quality guys are taken, there's really nothing to do other than comb the scrap heap or eye trades.

And if KW was saying "once Elgersma is settled we'll move"... well, I guess some could say it is settled (thought it's not) because didn't he sign in XFL or whatever?  And yet no moves on QBs.

Nah, the QB thing we're doing is clearly this:
- see what we have in all the new arms coming to TC
- see what Strev's rehab is looking like
- wait another year for Elgersma
- panic sign a couch/trade if Zach 6G's

Basically the same as always.  We're surprised at this point?