Blue Bombers Forum

The Extra Point => Blue Bomber & CFL Discussion Forum => Topic started by: TBURGESS on November 19, 2024, 05:40:30 PM

Title: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TBURGESS on November 19, 2024, 05:40:30 PM
Quarterback
Jake Dolegala (A)
Chris Streveler (A)
Running back
Johnny Augustine (N)
Fullback
Bailey Feltmate (N)
Receiver
Kenny Lawler (A)
Dalton Schoen (A)
Lucky Whitehead (A)
Offensive linemen
Stanley Bryant (A)
Liam Dobson (N)
Eric Lofton (A)
Patrick Neufeld (N)
Defensive linemen
Miles Fox (A)
TyJuan Garbutt (A)
Celestin Haba (A)
Willie Jefferson (A)
Jake Thomas (N)
Linebacker
Adam Bighill (A)
Brian Cole (A)
Shayne Gauthier (N)
Tony Jones (A)
Kyrie Wilson (A)
Defensive back
Brandon Alexander (A)
Tyrell Ford (N)
Nick Hallett (N) signed for 2 years - Jan 31 2024
Noah Hallett (N)
Evan Holm (A)
Jamal Parker (A)
Specialists
LS Mike Benson (N)
K Sergio Castillo (A)
- re-signed Nov 21, 1 year

I underlined the guys I don't care if we bring back.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on November 19, 2024, 05:52:53 PM
Agree with most of your selections...I wouldn't be in a hurry to bring any D lineman back until we sign a big name DT and DE. And I'd bring back Alexander for depth/injuries to our starting DB's but a lower $$. Also, Gauthier has been good on ST and is a decent role player on our D.

Key acquisitions needed in 2025- capable #2 Qb, capable #2 reciever, killer DE to compliment Willie, solid DT that commands double teaming vs the space fillers we have now. We get ZERO pressure from our inside D line.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Ridermania on November 19, 2024, 06:01:40 PM
Every CFL team has a large list of free agents.

Have to wait to see who retires or still rehabbing.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 19, 2024, 06:08:38 PM
Quote from: dd on November 19, 2024, 05:52:53 PMAgree with most of your selections...I wouldn't be in a hurry to bring any D lineman back until we sign a big name DT and DE. And I'd bring back Alexander for depth/injuries to our starting DB's but a lower $$. Also, Gauthier has been good on ST and is a decent role player on our D.

Key acquisitions needed in 2025- capable #2 Qb, capable #2 reciever, killer DE to compliment Willie, solid DT that commands double teaming vs the space fillers we have now. We get ZERO pressure from our inside D line.

Wilson is a capable # 2 receiver but it's too early to know whether we can afford to bring Lawler or Schoen back.  IMO I'd like both back on smaller contracts.

Nearly our DL players are potential free agents. I'm not sure I want any of them back but you can't replace them all. Some might look worse than they are due to those around them.

My list to not bring back is longer than yours but I'll leave that for awhile to see where the dust settles.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on November 19, 2024, 06:20:24 PM
Quarterback

Jake Dolegala (A)
Chris Streveler (A)

Running back

Johnny Augustine (N)

Fullback

Bailey Feltmate (N)


Receiver

Kenny Lawler (A)
Dalton Schoen (A)
Lucky Whitehead (A)

Offensive linemen

Stanley Bryant (A)
Liam Dobson (N)
Eric Lofton (A)

Patrick Neufeld (N)

Defensive linemen

Miles Fox (A)
TyJuan Garbutt (A)
Celestin Haba (A)
Willie Jefferson (A)
Jake Thomas (N)


Linebacker

Adam Bighill (A)
Brian Cole (A)
Shayne Gauthier (N)
Tony Jones (A)

Kyrie Wilson (A)

Defensive back

Brandon Alexander (A)
Tyrell Ford (N)
Nick Hallett (N)
Noah Hallett (N)
Evan Holm (A)

Jamal Parker (A)

Specialists

LS Mike Benson (N)
K Sergio Castillo (A)


Bold is "I want them to make their full effort at re-signing"

The rest, if the price is right, of course we'd like them back.

And other than Tyrell Ford and Evan Holm, there isn't any other player on the list that I would make a "sign at all costs" judgement on.

Now the discussion turns to what free agents do we chase in the tampering period...

Tre Ford is my #1 there.

Signing other teams free agents that are worthwhile is costly and not always well advised. Of course, anyone that gets passed over because of that team's $SMS issues are always interesting, like Bailey was last year, but I can't see us being high on the "buyers" list for any help, except at QB1b.

Oline has a full pipeline, and the draft this year.

Dline had a lot come off the IR late, and TC will shake them out.

WR and RB, well... if we only sign Lawler out of the FA list, we sill have Lawler, Demski, Wilson which is a solid core to build around, and some interesting prospects show up every year. 

LB, AB4 will be back, in whatever role, but Cole, Jones and Kramdi are pretty solid.

DB's, we gotta sign Ford and Holm. Nichols and Bonds will be fine, and if we can find a FS in the draft, that's a get.

I don't think Walters is going to have a hard time resigning most of the FA's he wants, and I am confident in our scouts to bring in some good competition for camp.

Interesting, the CFLPA will be putting out a club rating survey for the players, like the NFL, that rates each club to help potential free agents, draft picks and recruits to evaluate decisions. I can't see this being anything but a huge boon to the WFC, they should be top of the chars across the board.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: tlf on November 19, 2024, 08:17:01 PM
I agree with most of those.   Our backup QBs need refreshing.  Tre Ford to take over the following year anyone?

I fear S. Bryant may retire.

My priorities would be Jefferson, Thomas, Holm, Jones, Ford *if no NFL gig*, Benson, Castillo, and I'd like Hallett back.  Schoen..I'd love him to stay healthy a full season. So good when healthy.

 
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: ModAdmin on November 19, 2024, 08:52:08 PM
Quote from: tlf on November 19, 2024, 08:17:01 PMI agree with most of those.   Our backup QBs need refreshing.  Tre Ford to take over the following year anyone?

I fear S. Bryant may retire.

My priorities would be Jefferson, Thomas, Holm, Jones, Ford *if no NFL gig*, Benson, Castillo, and I'd like Hallett back.  Schoen..I'd love him to stay healthy a full season. So good when healthy.

 

Bryant has already said that he wants to come back next season.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: tlf on November 19, 2024, 09:07:21 PM
Quote from: ModAdmin on November 19, 2024, 08:52:08 PMBryant has already said that he wants to come back next season.

I missed that.  That is good news for ZC and the other pivots. I wondered with his health scare this year is all but that is great news.  Thanks!
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 19, 2024, 09:11:18 PM
Quote from: tlf on November 19, 2024, 08:17:01 PMI agree with most of those.  Our backup QBs need refreshing.  Tre Ford to take over the following year anyone?

I fear S. Bryant may retire.

My priorities would be Jefferson, Thomas, Holm, Jones, Ford *if no NFL gig*, Benson, Castillo, and I'd like Hallett back.  Schoen..I'd love him to stay healthy a full season. So good when healthy.

 

I don't think Ford has interest or gets another NFL opportunity. The problem is that he will get other offers in free agency in the CFL. It's possible another team offers him more than we can or should. There has to be a limit.

Benson can still play but we have Leroux returning to TC in 2025. He is probably the succession plan. I don't know what Benson earns but he turns 38 by TC. He might also consider retiring. While I don't think he earns a lot, there might still be a $20K savings on SMS.

It's too bad we don't know what players salaries are since that is part of mitigating the SMS over the roster.

Re-signing Holm and Ford might cost us another $100K each coming off an ELC?

I'm not so sure about Castillo though. He missed a bunch of FG's and that cost us a couple of games. K/O's were generally seemed shorter, but that may have been coaching choices. Again, it depends on what his salary is and what the new expectation will be. Are there other choices available in free agency or recruitment?

Anyone that gets an increase has an equal and opposite result elsewhere on the roster in theory.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Stats Junkie on November 19, 2024, 09:40:01 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 19, 2024, 09:11:18 PMBenson can still play but we have Leroux returning to TC in 2025. He is probably the succession plan. I don't know what Benson earns but he turns 38 by TC. He might also consider retiring. While I don't think he earns a lot, there might still be a $20K savings on SMS.
I hope that Leroux is the long snapper next year.

IMHO, Benson has been wildly inconsistent with his snaps since he arrived in Winnipeg. It was a massive downgrade from Chad Rempel.

Benson can thank Jamieson Sheahan for making him look good better than he is. High snaps, low snaps, inside or outside, Sheahan has done a good job of securing Benson's snaps these past two seasons. I would blame a handful of the Castillo misses on Benson's inconsistency. Even though Sheahan gets the ball down, the timing can be off.

We can do better.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 19, 2024, 09:52:40 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 19, 2024, 09:11:18 PMI don't think Ford has interest or gets another NFL opportunity. The problem is that he will get other offers in free agency in the CFL. It's possible another team offers him more than we can or should. There has to be a limit.

Re-signing Holm and Ford might cost us another $100K each coming off an ELC?



Maybe $100k more together, but not individually, top payment for DB's has to be around $140k, any more and you let them walk and make do with a cheap replacement, dime a dozen etc. Potentially Ford could set a new benchmark for DB's salaries because he's a VG Natl. CB, but $150k should be top offer if he'll sign a 3 year contract.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 19, 2024, 10:46:41 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 19, 2024, 09:52:40 PMMaybe $100k more together, but not individually, top payment for DB's has to be around $140k, any more and you let them walk and make do with a cheap replacement, dime a dozen etc. Potentially Ford could set a new benchmark for DB's salaries because he's a VG Natl. CB, but $150k should be top offer if he'll sign a 3 year contract.

Houston got $200K from the Stamps IIRC. We're paying Kramdi $140K if that figure is correct and a CB might hold more value than a SAM. A Canadian CB is more rare IMO.

I'd be happy if we can keep both / either at near $150K. The issue is that some teams try to " buy " a starter in free agency. Desjarlais got something like $230K in Ottawa. OL are valuable but they set the bar higher as a result.

I think Holm has more value than Houston and he'll get offers.

Obviously I'd like both back but if other teams offer more than $150K we may need to pass. My comment was that we could see either at $170K which is a $100K bump each.

You're suggestion for only another $100K in total would take them to about $124K from their ELC of $74K. Almost nobody besides QB's sign 3 year deals anymore. Draft choices but not on 2nd deals.

I'd be thrilled if that happens. We'll see.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on November 19, 2024, 10:54:19 PM
Quarterback

Jake Dolegala (A)          replace (Tre Ford)
Chris Streveler (A)        replace ( Wilson)

Running back

Johnny Augustine (N)        replace (Chris Ike)

Fullback

Bailey Feltmate (N)        replace (thru Draft)


Receiver

Kenny Lawler (A)          re-sign but no higher than 220k
Dalton Schoen (A)          re-sign at right price 180K?
Lucky Whitehead (A)        scout for a new returner

Offensive linemen       

Stanley Bryant (A)        re-sign
Liam Dobson (N)            re-sign
Eric Lofton (A)            re-sign
Patrick Neufeld (N)        re-sign reduced role..look at signing younger guard

Defensive linemen
Miles Fox (A)              replace need an upgrade           
TyJuan Garbutt (A)        re-sign
Celestin Haba (A)          replace need an upgrade  ie carrter/Mauldin from ottawa, Uguak mtrl
Willie Jefferson (A)      re-sign
Jake Thomas (N)            replace with lawton


Linebacker

Adam Bighill (A)          ok with re-signing at lower cap hit
Brian Cole (A)            resign
Shayne Gauthier (N)      replace thru draft
Tony Jones (A)            resign
Kyrie Wilson (A)          replace (he's 32 with injury history )

Defensive back

Brandon Alexander (A)    upgrade -esp if we cant resign ford. (BA would be excellent coach) 
Tyrell Ford (N)          re-sign
Nick Hallett (N)          re-sign
Noah Hallett (N)          time to retire, his body cant take much more
Evan Holm (A)            re-sign
Jamal Parker (A)          re-sign and will have to win a spot in training camp

Specialists

LS Mike Benson (N)        replace
K Sergio Castillo (A)    open up competition with CDn or Global, that extra di is valuable
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on November 19, 2024, 11:01:36 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 19, 2024, 10:46:41 PMHouston got $200K from the Stamps IIRC. We're paying Kramdi $140K if that figure is correct and a CB might hold more value than a SAM. A Canadian CB is more rare IMO.

I'd be happy if we can keep both / either at near $150K. The issue is that some teams try to " buy " a starter in free agency. Desjarlais got something like $230K in Ottawa. OL are valuable but they set the bar higher as a result.

I think Holm has more value than Houston and he'll get offers.

Obviously I'd like both back but if other teams offer more than $150K we may need to pass. My comment was that we could see either at $170K which is a $100K bump each.

You're suggestion for only another $100K in total would take them to about $124K from their ELC of $74K. Almost nobody besides QB's sign 3 year deals anymore. Draft choices but not on 2nd deals.

I'd be thrilled if that happens. We'll see.

There are players signing multi years deals other then QBs. Austin Mack just signed a 4 year deal. Demski will be on his last year of a 3 year deal.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on November 19, 2024, 11:08:23 PM
Ford will get top $$ in Free Agency and if Houston got $200, he'll easily get $200, and if we won't pay it, I am sure talent starved Edmonton couldn't write a cheque fast enough!! Same goes for Holm...he single handedly won the WF by totally shutting down Emilius, teams will be going after these guys big time as they are shut down game changers. They both would be high priority in my books to re-sign, and it will have to come from somewhere else, likely the D line--we won't be able to sign a big name DE or DT and we'll have to go with status quo, which isn't a bad thing either.

I would go after Tre Ford hard as our #2 and design a tempo package for him to run when he comes in for short yardage and let him roll it with the defenses jumbo package on. I think it would be excellent and he'd be a big step up from Strev. The guy can make plays in a phone booth.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on November 19, 2024, 11:09:26 PM
Quote from: Pete on November 19, 2024, 10:54:19 PMQuarterback

Jake Dolegala (A)          replace (Tre Ford)
Chris Streveler (A)        replace ( Wilson)

Running back

Johnny Augustine (N)        replace (Chris Ike)

Fullback

Bailey Feltmate (N)        replace (thru Draft)


Receiver

Kenny Lawler (A)          re-sign but no higher than 220k
Dalton Schoen (A)          re-sign at right price 180K?
Lucky Whitehead (A)        scout for a new returner

Offensive linemen       

Stanley Bryant (A)        re-sign
Liam Dobson (N)            re-sign
Eric Lofton (A)            re-sign
Patrick Neufeld (N)        re-sign reduced role..look at signing younger guard

Defensive linemen
Miles Fox (A)              replace need an upgrade           
TyJuan Garbutt (A)        re-sign
Celestin Haba (A)          replace need an upgrade  ie carrter/Mauldin from ottawa, Uguak mtrl
Willie Jefferson (A)      re-sign
Jake Thomas (N)            replace with lawton


Linebacker

Adam Bighill (A)          ok with re-signing at lower cap hit
Brian Cole (A)            resign
Shayne Gauthier (N)      replace thru draft
Tony Jones (A)            resign
Kyrie Wilson (A)          replace (he's 32 with injury history )

Defensive back

Brandon Alexander (A)    upgrade -esp if we cant resign ford. (BA would be excellent coach) 
Tyrell Ford (N)          re-sign
Nick Hallett (N)          re-sign
Noah Hallett (N)          time to retire, his body cant take much more
Evan Holm (A)            re-sign
Jamal Parker (A)          re-sign and will have to win a spot in training camp

Specialists

LS Mike Benson (N)        replace
K Sergio Castillo (A)    open up competition with CDn or Global, that extra di is valuable


I am not sure Chris-Ike is ready to replace JA27 yet. Chris-Ike had problems staying healthy, and has to prove he can run the ball at this level.

Feltmate is good on teams and blocks well. He is a MOS/Miller type of players.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 19, 2024, 11:28:27 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 19, 2024, 10:46:41 PMHouston got $200K from the Stamps IIRC. We're paying Kramdi $140K if that figure is correct and a CB might hold more value than a SAM. A Canadian CB is more rare IMO.

I'd be happy if we can keep both / either at near $150K. The issue is that some teams try to " buy " a starter in free agency. Desjarlais got something like $230K in Ottawa. OL are valuable but they set the bar higher as a result.

I think Holm has more value than Houston and he'll get offers.

Obviously I'd like both back but if other teams offer more than $150K we may need to pass. My comment was that we could see either at $170K which is a $100K bump each.

You're suggestion for only another $100K in total would take them to about $124K from their ELC of $74K. Almost nobody besides QB's sign 3 year deals anymore. Draft choices but not on 2nd deals.

I'd be thrilled if that happens. We'll see.

4) Deatrick Nichols, Winnipeg Blue Bombers (A)

Hard money: $140,000
Maximum value: $154,000

10) Demerio Houston, Calgary Stampeders (A)

Hard money: $128,800
Maximum value: $136,800

I don't think either Ford or Holm signed for ELC min. especially Ford., I'd expect they made aprox. $85-$90k this season maybe even more. It's good policy to reward players that put in great performances with a few extra payments however they can, instead of twisting nickels and holding them ransom for the first few years on their ELC contracts. Note that Holm just finished his 3rd season with the team, which I've never heard an explanation why the extra year.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: gobombersgo on November 19, 2024, 11:31:59 PM
Nick Hallett isn't a pending free agent as he was extended for 2 years last off season.

Hodge has updated his list.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: gobombersgo on November 19, 2024, 11:36:33 PM
Nick Taylor is a pending free agent according to Ed Tait, which makes sense.

Also, for what it's worth, Jake Dolegala wasn't on the list that the Bombers provided to Tait.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on November 20, 2024, 12:25:17 AM
Dolegala was a short term fix since Strev got hurt mid season. Seems they weren't impressed with what he did in practice as Wilson got the call before him in the big game, no surprise he's gone, next year, we're looking to upgrade that position and he obviously isn't it, Wilson at #3 is our #2 until a new #2 comes along.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 20, 2024, 02:37:11 AM
Quote from: Pigskin on November 19, 2024, 11:01:36 PMThere are players signing multi years deals other then QBs. Austin Mack just signed a 4 year deal. Demski will be on his last year of a 3 year deal.


I said almost nobody. Just look at our potential free agents and you'll see a long list that only sign 1 year deals.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 20, 2024, 02:41:55 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 19, 2024, 11:28:27 PM4) Deatrick Nichols, Winnipeg Blue Bombers (A)

Hard money: $140,000
Maximum value: $154,000

10) Demerio Houston, Calgary Stampeders (A)

Hard money: $128,800
Maximum value: $136,800

I don't think either Ford or Holm signed for ELC min. especially Ford., I'd expect they made aprox. $85-$90k this season maybe even more. It's good policy to reward players that put in great performances with a few extra payments however they can, instead of twisting nickels and holding them ransom for the first few years on their ELC contracts. Note that Holm just finished his 3rd season with the team, which I've never heard an explanation why the extra year.

I'm sure I heard that Houston signed for $200K in Calgary but I'll take your word for it that he signed for less.

It's true that 1st contract players don't necessarily sign for rock bottom ELC deals. That might be more true for Canadians that sign 3 year deals.

However, I'd still be surprised if either got as much as you think. Holm did sign a new 1 year deal so he'd be above bottom ELC.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Ridermania on November 20, 2024, 01:31:36 PM
With hosting the Grey Cup, Bombers will go way over the salary cap for one last hurrah.

Then lots of retirements/releases and start fresh with younger players.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 20, 2024, 01:44:49 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on November 19, 2024, 11:09:26 PMI am not sure Chris-Ike is ready to replace JA27 yet. Chris-Ike had problems staying healthy, and has to prove he can run the ball at this level.

Feltmate is good on teams and blocks well. He is a MOS/Miller type of players.

Hard to say if Chris-Ike was injured often or just bumped in favour of another player on our AR since we already had JA27.

When JA27 and Oliveria were extended a few years ago IIRC, he was going to get about $110K. That potentially becomes an opportunity to save some SMS. Obviously it would be good to know we have a good replacement  He is a good player on ST's an emergency back up at RB. That said, we'd probably move to an import RB if we had a long term injury.

So it's more of a question can we afford to keep him.

Feltmate has been a decent player. We have some 2024 draft choices returning and then we'll have the 2025 draft players. It will depend on how many other Canadians we lose from the roster.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 20, 2024, 01:47:12 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on November 20, 2024, 01:31:36 PMWith hosting the Grey Cup, Bombers will go way over the salary cap for one last hurrah.

Then lots of retirements/releases and start fresh with younger players.

I think we'll see a bigger changing of the guard with younger players start this year. Going way over the cap is not the way of the Bombers. Noting that they didn't do that in previous seasons. I don't think they did this season but we may be over by similar amounts to last year.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on November 20, 2024, 03:52:06 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 20, 2024, 01:47:12 PMI think we'll see a bigger changing of the guard with younger players start this year. Going way over the cap is not the way of the Bombers. Noting that they didn't do that in previous seasons. I don't think they did this season but we may be over by similar amounts to last year.

This is not a normal year.  It is GC at home year.  It is "end of an era" year for many players. 

This is NOT the time to let $SMS b a deciding factor in a key player's retention.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 20, 2024, 04:20:45 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on November 20, 2024, 03:52:06 PMThis is not a normal year.  It is GC at home year.  It is "end of an era" year for many players. 

This is NOT the time to let $SMS b a deciding factor in a key player's retention.

I disagree. You throw out concern for the SMS and the league is in chaos.  Other teams have owners that can outspend community teams. It's WHY there is an SMS.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on November 20, 2024, 04:25:41 PM
BC threw the $SMS out the window with the Rourke mis-step.  For a GC appearance at home.  The precedent has been set, and the league is not yet in chaos.

Question:

We now know about the soft "appearance money" that can be used in the player cap, does the same go for the front office cap?

Can Lapo be given a staff position with verifiable duties in the media side of things?  Writing content for the web page and doing podcasts and such?  Outside the normal front office $SMS?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on November 20, 2024, 04:33:18 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on November 20, 2024, 03:52:06 PMThis is not a normal year.  It is GC at home year.  It is "end of an era" year for many players. 

This is NOT the time to let $SMS b a deciding factor in a key player's retention.

You still have to build your roster within the parameters of the SMS.

The last thing Walters should do is take the Taman Approach to win it all at home.

And if players want to remain part of this organization to try for a sixth straight Grey Cup berth to win it all at home, they should probably put self-interest aside and be willing to consider taking a haircut in order to try and get there.

FIFO.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 20, 2024, 04:44:49 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on November 20, 2024, 04:25:41 PMBC threw the $SMS out the window with the Rourke mis-step.  For a GC appearance at home.  The precedent has been set, and the league is not yet in chaos.

Question:

We now know about the soft "appearance money" that can be used in the player cap, does the same go for the front office cap?

Can Lapo be given a staff position with verifiable duties in the media side of things?  Writing content for the web page and doing podcasts and such?  Outside the normal front office $SMS?

It will be if more teams take the same approach. I'd expect changes to what the penalties become going forward.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on November 20, 2024, 05:09:40 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on November 20, 2024, 03:52:06 PMThis is not a normal year.  It is GC at home year.  It is "end of an era" year for many players. 

This is NOT the time to let $SMS b a deciding factor in a key player's retention.

Remembering that salary cap is calculated after the season is over and GMs have no way of predicting how the season will go in regards to injuries or players becoming available later in the season.

No one goes over the salary cap before the season starts. We may plan for a smaller reserve than normal (which we already did this year), or we may add in a late player if someone comes up.

Are we going to offer every single one of our FA's the highest offer? No. Are we going to add multiple top FAs? also no.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 20, 2024, 05:15:47 PM
Quote from: Jesse on November 20, 2024, 05:09:40 PMRemembering that salary cap is calculated after the season is over and GMs have no way of predicting how the season will go in regards to injuries or players becoming available later in the season.

No one goes over the salary cap before the season starts. We may plan for a smaller reserve than normal (which we already did this year), or we may add in a late player if someone comes up.

Are we going to offer every single one of our FA's the highest offer? No. Are we going to add multiple top FAs? also no.

Budgets have contingencies but you're right. Some times thing are under and some are over. On a weekly basis a team can see if the weekly calculation is + or -.

Bombers didn't have many players on the 1 game IR for the season. That might have saved some SMS. We didn't bring in many players after TC. Whitehead and Taylor. Even then Taylor was not on the AR during the season.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 20, 2024, 05:43:19 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on November 20, 2024, 04:33:18 PMYou still have to build your roster within the parameters of the SMS.

The last thing Walters should do is take the Taman Approach to win it all at home.

And if players want to remain part of this organization to try for a sixth straight Grey Cup berth to win it all at home, they should probably put self-interest aside and be willing to consider taking a haircut in order to try and get there.

FIFO.

Agree, Walters stays the course and remains fiscally responsible so he can also field a competitive team in 2026, 2027, 2028.  You don't blow your wad for the GC and start over again from scratch, there is no guarantee they win and spoiled Bomber fans would show zero tolerance for a complete rebuild afterward. Remember the follies of Taman!
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on November 20, 2024, 06:16:29 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 20, 2024, 05:43:19 PMAgree, Walters stays the course and remains fiscally responsible so he can also field a competitive team in 2026, 2027, 2028.  You don't blow your wad for the GC and start over again from scratch, there is no guarantee they win and spoiled Bomber fans would show zero tolerance for a complete rebuild afterward. Remember the follies of Taman!

This team is in rebuild in 2026.  There is no doubt a large part of the team is gone after 2025.  A LARGE part.  Especially if we win the GC at home.

Bryant, Neufeld, Thomas, Jefferson, Collaros, Bighill... I don't think any will play in 2026 if we win the cup, or even if we do not.

So, blowing the $SMS to keep the core guys we will build 2026 and beyond with becomes very important.  Ford, Holm, Haba, Jones, Cole, Dobson, Lofton, Lawler, Schoen... these are key guys after 2025.  Signing them for 2025 has double meaning.  Both for 2025 cup at home, and beyond.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on November 20, 2024, 06:28:24 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on November 20, 2024, 06:16:29 PMThis team is in rebuild in 2026.

Nah.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on November 20, 2024, 06:30:48 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on November 20, 2024, 06:28:24 PMNah.

You don't think losing your QB, your best DL, HOF LT and other key parts is "rebuild" territory?

OK...
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 20, 2024, 06:37:26 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on November 20, 2024, 06:16:29 PMThis team is in rebuild in 2026.  There is no doubt a large part of the team is gone after 2025.  A LARGE part.  Especially if we win the GC at home.

Bryant, Neufeld, Thomas, Jefferson, Collaros, Bighill... I don't think any will play in 2026 if we win the cup, or even if we do not.

So, blowing the $SMS to keep the core guys we will build 2026 and beyond with becomes very important.  Ford, Holm, Haba, Jones, Cole, Dobson, Lofton, Lawler, Schoen... these are key guys after 2025.  Signing them for 2025 has double meaning.  Both for 2025 cup at home, and beyond.

Rebuild began last off-season and will continue this off-season, it's gradual but continual.  Something like 23 players changes from last year.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on November 20, 2024, 06:40:23 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on November 20, 2024, 06:30:48 PMYou don't think losing your QB, your best DL, HOF LT and other key parts is "rebuild" territory?

OK...

I can't and won't answer a silly leading question like that.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on November 20, 2024, 08:48:53 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 20, 2024, 05:43:19 PMAgree, Walters stays the course and remains fiscally responsible so he can also field a competitive team in 2026, 2027, 2028.  You don't blow your wad for the GC and start over again from scratch, there is no guarantee they win and spoiled Bomber fans would show zero tolerance for a complete rebuild afterward. Remember the follies of Taman!

CFL isn't like other league's in that sense though. I can't think of much you could do in 2025 that would after 2026 negatively.

If you go over the cap, you pay the fine and move on.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 20, 2024, 09:08:41 PM
Quote from: Jesse on November 20, 2024, 08:48:53 PMCFL isn't like other league's in that sense though. I can't think of much you could do in 2025 that would after 2026 negatively.

If you go over the cap, you pay the fine and move on.

A team can go from 1st to last in the course of one off season. Re-build / re-load is every year. The team that finds the right combination of players at the right money tends to do well. I think every team finds a few new gems each season at ELC money and that helps.

When a player has good success in his 1st contract then retaining him becomes a problem sometimes. The market place means some will move on. NFL option year compounds that as well.

Retaining a few too many older vets can mean you need to change a larger number the following year. IE: You don't want to keep 12 players this year and then try to replace them all the following year.

It's a balancing act of retaining experience but also bringing alone the younger less expensive players and fitting it all into the SMS.

I'd target about 6 new starters in a new season as the max I'd like to imagine. We exceeded that in 2024 and hence the slow start.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on November 20, 2024, 11:33:49 PM
I think the strong teams - Toronto, Montreal and Winnipeg, focus on retaining as many of their impact FA's as they can vs go the FA route, vs the weaker teams, who need to 'poach' an impact player from one of the stronger rosters in an attempt to make their rosters stronger.

I don't see Winnipeg, Toronto or Montreal losing many of the quality FA's, as they are solid franchises with good clubhouses,  hence they won't suffer a huge talent lose and will remain at the top of the league. The weaker teams, will pay the big ticket for 1 or 2 FA, yet still don't have the roster depth to move up to a top seed position. Hamilton and Ottawa have been weak for a few years now and I don't see that changing. Same for Calgary and Edmonton, they're such a mess god himself couldn't turn their teams around.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on November 21, 2024, 02:08:33 AM
Quote from: dd on November 20, 2024, 11:33:49 PMI think the strong teams - Toronto, Montreal and Winnipeg, focus on retaining as many of their impact FA's as they can vs go the FA route, vs the weaker teams, who need to 'poach' an impact player from one of the stronger rosters in an attempt to make their rosters stronger.

I don't see Winnipeg, Toronto or Montreal losing many of the quality FA's, as they are solid franchises with good clubhouses,  hence they won't suffer a huge talent lose and will remain at the top of the league. The weaker teams, will pay the big ticket for 1 or 2 FA, yet still don't have the roster depth to move up to a top seed position. Hamilton and Ottawa have been weak for a few years now and I don't see that changing. Same for Calgary and Edmonton, they're such a mess god himself couldn't turn their teams around.
The trouble with success as we know well, is that with it players want to be financially rewarded. Coxie in toronto for example, alexander in mtrl. Ly toronto lost Pickett, Barlow and more.
Some FA will be available.
I will say mtrl has done a great job so far in being proactive to extend key players and have just resigned Beverette. It seems the closer a player gets to free agency the more expensive it gets
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on November 21, 2024, 02:16:09 PM
I think we go into next season with the lineup that gives us the best shot at winning the cup. Going for younger developing talent will wait.
For example at safety why not look at Purifoy who can backup Kramdl as well
At backup qb maybe Mair becomes affordable.(Given they will not move Collaros)
Do we look at Santo Knox?
Likely means Neufeld.Jefferson Wolitarski Bryant fit into this as well

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 21, 2024, 02:28:28 PM
Quote from: Pete on November 21, 2024, 02:16:09 PMI think we go into next season with the lineup that gives us the best shot at winning the cup. Going for younger developing talent will wait.
For example at safety why not look at Purifoy who can backup Kramdl as well
At backup qb maybe Mair becomes affordable.(Given they will not move Collaros)
Do we look at Santo Knox?



That's a loaded statement to determine which players give us the best shot at winning. Nobody is suggesting we give up the chance of winning by replacing every vet in order to develop new younger players.

Many vets will be in line to earn a higher contracts. By definition that means we lose others due to SMS and we have more rookies join the team either as starters or back ups. You can't just give everybody a raise and not expect to see rookies join the team.

Football has to be forward thinking as well as winning in the immediate time frame. This is true whether you finished 1st or last or whether the Grey Cup is in your home stadium.

As far as Purifoy, he's a bit of a headcase and doesn't fit O'Shea's expectations. Santos-Knox would be a good addition but we have Jones, Cole and Ayers with Bighill still wanting to play.

It's hard to say who we lose in free agency but I'd be more interested in targeting a DL like C. Sayles if the numbers work out. Ceresna was another one mentioned. Our DL is the weakest part of our defence.

I haven't checked to see who else might be available for an addition at safety if we don't re-sign Alexander. That's still a TBD. He's only 31 so he's still got some miles left.  His stats are about the same as Purifoy.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on November 21, 2024, 02:36:59 PM
Here's who I wouldn't bring back:

Chris Streveler (next year barring a big surprise might be): Collaros, Wilson, Dolegala/Grainer)
Johnny Augustine
Dalton Schoen
Lucky Whitehead
Patrick Neufeld (somewhat on the fence, not sure what we'll get in another year).
Celestin Haba (a very disappointing year 2, outplayed by Garbutt)
Jake Thomas
Adam Bighill
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: LXTSN on November 21, 2024, 03:17:53 PM
Do we think we can get Schoen and Lawler both back for another season?
I just have a hard time seeing them make that decision with how that handcuffed our roster options this last season. It's a lot of money to spend on a single position group.
Of those two receivers would you rather retain Lawler or Schoen?
Did we have enough firepower in our receiving core with out both of them?
Sask seems to develop or find WR options better than anyone these days! Meyers, Ajou, Bane, Emilus, Johnson, Picton and Sterns.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 21, 2024, 03:29:37 PM
Quote from: LXTSN on November 21, 2024, 03:17:53 PMDo we think we can get Schoen and Lawler both back for another season?
I just have a hard time seeing them make that decision with how that handcuffed our roster options this last season. It's a lot of money to spend on a single position group.
Of those two receivers would you rather retain Lawler or Schoen?
Did we have enough firepower in our receiving core with out both of them?
Sask seems to develop or find WR options better than anyone these days! Meyers, Ajou, Bane, Emilus, Johnson, Picton and Sterns.

I think we could bring back both of them. I'm not so sure we will. Schoen's injury may delay his return and / or make him more suspect in re-injury. Never really heard what his injury was so that's a question that could be a concern.

It did handcuff our ability with SMS spend potentially otherwise. That said, we finished in 1st and ended up in the Grey Cup.

IMO we didn't have enough firepower in the receiving group. Josh Johnson was a bust. Wheatfall could be good going forward but not that good in 2024.

We succeeded finding O. Wilson but I don't know why we weren't shuffling through more candidates on our PR to find another good rookie.

If Woli was healthy our overall receiver / depth would have been better but by how much?

Finding very good receivers has not been a strong suit for Winnipeg for many years. We've brought in veterans at times but besides Schoen and Wilson who have we found on our own? Lawler was a cut by the Lions before we brought him to Winnipeg.

Woli was a good find, but he's not a # 1 or even a # 2 guy.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on November 21, 2024, 03:32:54 PM
Quote from: LXTSN on November 21, 2024, 03:17:53 PMDo we think we can get Schoen and Lawler both back for another season?
I just have a hard time seeing them make that decision with how that handcuffed our roster options this last season. It's a lot of money to spend on a single position group.
Of those two receivers would you rather retain Lawler or Schoen?
Did we have enough firepower in our receiving core with out both of them?
Sask seems to develop or find WR options better than anyone these days! Meyers, Ajou, Bane, Emilus, Johnson, Picton and Sterns.

Hard to say. It depends how everything else shakes out. If basically everyone else comes back it's going to be difficult and probably impossible. If we've got the appetite to make some changes then it's likely a possibility if we want that.

For example: Are we willing to move on from Neufeld and go with Gabe Wallace? Are we willing to replace Drew Wolitarsky for Kevens Clercius? What about Brandon Alexander? Can we find a more economical option? Wilson or Dolegala for Streveler? (Dolegala might not a savings but Wilson would be, likely) Can we run thinner at Canadian DL and run with Lawson and Schemekel or equivalent? What if we turned that Canadian DL spot in an import spot and found first year Americans? How much less effective would it really be?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: BlueFire on November 21, 2024, 04:05:09 PM
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on November 21, 2024, 02:36:59 PMHere's who I wouldn't bring back:

Chris Streveler (next year barring a big surprise might be): Collaros, Wilson, Dolegala/Grainer)
Johnny Augustine
Dalton Schoen
Lucky Whitehead
Patrick Neufeld (somewhat on the fence, not sure what we'll get in another year).
Celestin Haba (a very disappointing year 2, outplayed by Garbutt)
Jake Thomas
Adam Bighill

Thomas has stuck around because of his passport.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 21, 2024, 04:24:38 PM
Those that I don't expect back but as you decide on some, it may leave room, experience and SMS for others to be retained. You can't disregard 15 - 20 players per se.

Noting that my list is still actually longer but includes some 2nd year import DL where SMS is not specifically an issue.

In the case of the list it's where we might need to make some decisions to save SMS in order to re-sign others. Some on the list have value but will it be best bang for the buck? It would be helpful to know current contract money.

1. Augustine
2. Benson
3. Bighill
4. Feltmate
5. Gauthier
6. Nick Hallett
7. Noah Hallett
8. Neufeld
9. Streveler
10. Thomas
11. K. Wilson
12. Wolitarski
13. Dolegala
14. Whitehead
15. Parker
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on November 21, 2024, 05:26:13 PM
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on November 21, 2024, 02:36:59 PMHere's who I wouldn't bring back:

Chris Streveler (next year barring a big surprise might be): Collaros, Wilson, Dolegala/Grainer)
Johnny Augustine
Dalton Schoen
Lucky Whitehead
Patrick Neufeld (somewhat on the fence, not sure what we'll get in another year).
Celestin Haba (a very disappointing year 2, outplayed by Garbutt)
Jake Thomas
Adam Bighill


I think it's safe to say that almost all of those players will be back.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on November 21, 2024, 05:27:09 PM
Quote from: Jesse on November 21, 2024, 05:26:13 PMI think it's safe to say that almost all of those players will be back.

You're probably correct.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on November 21, 2024, 08:11:40 PM
Would Kongbo be worth a look? He didn't play this past season but I think he still has plenty left in the tank.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 21, 2024, 08:19:56 PM
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on November 21, 2024, 05:27:09 PMYou're probably correct.

That would be unfortunate IMO.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TrueBlue4 on November 21, 2024, 08:55:22 PM
Quote from: TBURGESS on November 19, 2024, 05:40:30 PMQuarterback
Jake Dolegala (A)
Chris Streveler (A)
Running back
Johnny Augustine (N)
Fullback
Bailey Feltmate (N)
Receiver
Kenny Lawler (A)
Dalton Schoen (A)
Lucky Whitehead (A)
Offensive linemen
Stanley Bryant (A)
Liam Dobson (N)
Eric Lofton (A)
Patrick Neufeld (N)
Defensive linemen
Miles Fox (A)
TyJuan Garbutt (A)
Celestin Haba (A)
Willie Jefferson (A)
Jake Thomas (N)
Linebacker
Adam Bighill (A)
Brian Cole (A)
Shayne Gauthier (N)
Tony Jones (A)
Kyrie Wilson (A)
Defensive back
Brandon Alexander (A)
Tyrell Ford (N)
Nick Hallett (N) signed for 2 years - Jan 31 2024
Noah Hallett (N)
Evan Holm (A)
Jamal Parker (A)
Specialists
LS Mike Benson (N)
K Sergio Castillo (A)


I underlined the guys I don't care if we bring back.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: bwiser on November 21, 2024, 09:55:01 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on November 21, 2024, 08:11:40 PMWould Kongbo be worth a look? He didn't play this past season but I think he still has plenty left in the tank.
He would be worth bringing into camp and see how he looks. He is a national who could possibly start depending how he showed in camp. If he doesn't look good in camp release him.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: BBRT on November 21, 2024, 10:37:03 PM
Quote from: Jesse on November 21, 2024, 05:26:13 PMI think it's safe to say that almost all of those players will be back.

If that is the case then we are in deep deep do-do as a bunch of these folks are long past their best before date IMHO.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on November 21, 2024, 11:09:45 PM
I d definitely bring back Lawler as our #1 reciever---proved beyond a doubt in the WF his worth as a #1, single handedly won the game for us.

For the other starters, I'd have Demski, Woli and Wilson, with Clercius as depth/backup.

I think we need a solid #2, I wouldn't bring in Schoen due to injury history, he may be back later in the season and his contract hit would be prorated.

So find a good #2 who's a FA on a team that isn't going anywhere ie Ottawa, Hamilton, Edmonton, Calgary. Maybe Wilson can develop into a more dominant role, who knows. Wheatfall definitely doesn't have it.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on November 22, 2024, 03:57:54 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 20, 2024, 09:08:41 PMIt's a balancing act of retaining experience but also bringing alone the younger less expensive players and fitting it all into the SMS.

I'd target about 6 new starters in a new season as the max I'd like to imagine. We exceeded that in 2024 and hence the slow start.


Six new starters
Guard (free agent signing)
Wide receiver (rookie)
Dt or de (free agent)
Safety (rookie)
Returner (rookie)
Both the guard and dline would require big investments.
I am not including positions as mlb where jones already became starter
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 22, 2024, 04:25:04 PM
Quote from: Pete on November 22, 2024, 03:57:54 PMSix new starters
Guard (free agent signing)
Wide receiver (rookie)
Dt or de (free agent)
Safety (rookie)
Returner (rookie)
Both the guard and dline would require big investments.
I am not including positions as mlb where jones already became starter

Both Dobson and Neufeld are potential free agents. So it may not cost as much more as it appears on the surface. Both could be back or we could see Wallace as a starter and a free agent added as well.

It's never a sure thing but the team will have graded everybody. Then they'll look at SMS and other opportunities. The draft comes into play and that might be the new # 6 OL.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on November 22, 2024, 04:30:32 PM
Will wallace addition make us stronger?
We've been playing keep the status quo for a while, I would like to see us add 2 players that actually.improve the team.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on November 22, 2024, 04:58:11 PM
I will say that the Bombers will try and sign Lofton at a reasonable price. If not they have Randolph or Vanterpool. Bryant and Neufled will be back for there final year. Dobson may go out and shop himself around as he was an all-star. Is Wallace ready to take the next step? Then there is Vlahogiannis who went back to school and had a pretty good year. We will draft an OL but I don't think at #7.

There are lots of DBs and DLs in the top 20 prospects. DB/WR Jackson Findlay. 6'3" 203lbs. 4.59/40, would be a nice pickup at #7. 
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 22, 2024, 05:12:19 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on November 22, 2024, 04:58:11 PMI will say that the Bombers will try and sign Lofton at a reasonable price. If not they have Randolph or Vanterpool. Bryant and Neufled will be back for there final year. Dobson may go out and shop himself around as he was an all-star. Is Wallace ready to take the next step? Then there is Vlahogiannis who went back to school and had a pretty good year. We will draft an OL but I don't think at #7.

There are lots of DBs and DLs in the top 20 prospects. DB/WR Jackson Findlay. 6'3" 203lbs. 4.59/40, would be a nice pickup at #7. 

I'd like to see them move on from Dobson, his mobility as a run blocker was a huge downgrade from what Geoff Gray brought. Don't know how well Wallace would do as a replacement, haven't seen him pass block enough to know yet but he's great moving the pile. 
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on November 22, 2024, 05:35:09 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 22, 2024, 05:12:19 PMI'd like to see them move on from Dobson, his mobility as a run blocker was a huge downgrade from what Geoff Gray brought. Don't know how well Wallace would do as a replacement, haven't seen him pass block enough to know yet but he's great moving the pile. 

In week 23, Liam Dobson was the best ranked run blocking offensive lineman...of all four teams in the divisional finals.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 22, 2024, 06:36:51 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on November 22, 2024, 04:58:11 PMI will say that the Bombers will try and sign Lofton at a reasonable price. If not they have Randolph or Vanterpool. Bryant and Neufled will be back for there final year. Dobson may go out and shop himself around as he was an all-star. Is Wallace ready to take the next step? Then there is Vlahogiannis who went back to school and had a pretty good year. We will draft an OL but I don't think at #7.

There are lots of DBs and DLs in the top 20 prospects. DB/WR Jackson Findlay. 6'3" 203lbs. 4.59/40, would be a nice pickup at #7. 

It's all guess work with potential free agents. Without knowing who explores free agency or at what cost, doesn't help.

That will go into the draft decision since that is post the free agency rush. We may retain or acquire players at any number of positions. The 2023 draft choice will be back to compete etc.

Also mentioned is that our ratio allows us to move towards 3 import OL. I'm not suggesting that be we held onto the 2 extra import OL to end the season.

That may be curtains for Lofton or at least lower his ask.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 22, 2024, 07:05:57 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 22, 2024, 06:36:51 PMIt's all guess work with potential free agents. Without knowing who explores free agency or at what cost, doesn't help.

That will go into the draft decision since that is post the free agency rush. We may retain or acquire players at any number of positions. The 2023 draft choice will be back to compete etc.

Also mentioned is that our ratio allows us to move towards 3 import OL. I'm not suggesting that be we held onto the 2 extra import OL to end the season.

That may be curtains for Lofton or at least lower his ask.

Randolph proved himself in game so they'll likely keep him, don't think they need another import OL unless they're willing to sit on the PR waiting for their turn.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 22, 2024, 07:29:55 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 22, 2024, 07:05:57 PMRandolph proved himself in game so they'll likely keep him, don't think they need another import OL unless they're willing to sit on the PR waiting for their turn.

Randolph and Vanterpool are both bigger and younger than Lofton. Both are on ELC's while Lofton was above ELC and may be looking for more money. How big a financial swing and talent swing the team will need to decide.

I don't know how the team graded each of those players. The rookies may not be prepared to spend next season mostly on the PR.

Of the 3 import OL, we may only keep 2 and which starts is a TBD by the team I guess.  There are always a bunch of rookie OL in TC to spread the TC workload and see what upgrades might be available.  An interesting TC battle for sure.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 22, 2024, 07:40:39 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 22, 2024, 07:29:55 PMRandolph and Vanterpool are both bigger and younger than Lofton. Both are on ELC's while Lofton was above ELC and may be looking for more money. How big a financial swing and talent swing the team will need to decide.

I don't know how the team graded each of those players. The rookies may not be prepared to spend next season mostly on the PR.

Of the 3 import OL, we may only keep 2 and which starts is a TBD by the team I guess.  There are always a bunch of rookie OL in TC to spread the TC workload and see what upgrades might be available.  An interesting TC battle for sure.

Sorry I was referring to the inside 3 positions, I don't think they'll make any changes on the outside 2 as long as Bryant is coming back.  Lofton did alright, maybe not an all-star but adequate, and at journeyman wages that's par for the course.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on November 22, 2024, 08:24:03 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 22, 2024, 07:05:57 PMRandolph proved himself in game so they'll likely keep him, don't think they need another import OL unless they're willing to sit on the PR waiting for their turn.

I'd like to see Wallace and Randolph in for Dobson and Lofton respectively.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 22, 2024, 09:09:38 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 22, 2024, 07:40:39 PMSorry I was referring to the inside 3 positions, I don't think they'll make any changes on the outside 2 as long as Bryant is coming back.  Lofton did alright, maybe not an all-star but adequate, and at journeyman wages that's par for the course.

4 of our starting OL are potential free agents. We have 3 OL rookies ( 2 imports and 1 Canadian ) returning for their 2nd year + the draft choice that returned to college.

Our ratio does allow the thought of a 3rd import OL although that isn't the preference.

I always like to retain all the Canadians but I see the chance that might not happen. In 2024 we ended up with 2 starters gone.

2025 might result in change is all I'm saying.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 22, 2024, 09:15:16 PM
Quote from: Jesse on November 22, 2024, 08:24:03 PMI'd like to see Wallace and Randolph in for Dobson and Lofton respectively.

Both are bigger, younger, on ELC's and still under contract. I have no idea how all this will work out but I'd like to see open competition in TC if they all return.

We don't always have a choice in free agency.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on November 22, 2024, 09:23:03 PM
The main issue with Imp Oline is a yard off the ball.  How quick they adapt (if they do at all) to changing the whole way they are wired to react to a snap makes a huge difference between them and a Nat Olineman.  Even with playing with one yard advantage all their lives, Nat Oline still can take years to become CFL starters.

Having a guy like hut HUT Wylie moulding them into shape makes a big difference.  Figuring out who is going to learn the nuances of CFL blocking is a scouting key.  And a coaching necessity. 

Olinemen being bigger or younger isn't always a bonus.  It true that you can't coach size, but it takes more than size to be a good olineman, you need quick feet and hands, and great technique. 

The big difference between Imp and Nat Oline is quantity.  There are a lot more to choose from in the Imp ranks, for sure.  So, while we hold onto NAT Olinemen we draft while they develop, its a lot easier to cycle through Imp Oline on the PR.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 22, 2024, 11:31:01 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on November 22, 2024, 09:23:03 PMThe main issue with Imp Oline is a yard off the ball.  How quick they adapt (if they do at all) to changing the whole way they are wired to react to a snap makes a huge difference between them and a Nat Olineman.  Even with playing with one yard advantage all their lives, Nat Oline still can take years to become CFL starters.

Having a guy like hut HUT Wylie moulding them into shape makes a big difference.  Figuring out who is going to learn the nuances of CFL blocking is a scouting key.  And a coaching necessity. 

Olinemen being bigger or younger isn't always a bonus.  It true that you can't coach size, but it takes more than size to be a good olineman, you need quick feet and hands, and great technique. 

The big difference between Imp and Nat Oline is quantity.  There are a lot more to choose from in the Imp ranks, for sure.  So, while we hold onto NAT Olinemen we draft while they develop, its a lot easier to cycle through Imp Oline on the PR.



No argument with the points you made. Some adjust more quickly than others and some never adjust. Bigger, faster, younger and cheaper are just starting points when OL earn so much.

I'd like Desjarlais back ( as an example ) if he's a free agent and wants to return. However he'll want big bucks. Just wishful thinking.

We will need to be giving some players more money than in 2024. That means others will need to get less. No surprised in that and every team will have the same issues.

I'm not counting on too many players taking a cut from 2024 salaries.  Obviously this is going to result in some vets not returning.

At the moment there is only a list of players that may not return in order to squeeze the rest into the SMS.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 23, 2024, 02:51:44 PM
A short list of players that might be SMS issues.

1. Ford. I have heard he has some new NFL tryouts. So that might be beyond our control.
2. Holm. He might be the next Houston where other teams offer more that we can compete with realistically.
3. Dobson. Re-signing good Canadians early in their careers is not always easy.
4. Lawler. Can we fit him into the SMS? Does he want more than in 2024?
5. Schoen. Same question as Lawler except he won't looking for a raise.

I think the rest of the potential free agents that we want to retain will be back. The question is how does the re-negotiating go for those in the list. In theory we were close to SMS cap, so there is not a lot of room to spend cumulatively more without something giving.

That's where the need to part ways with some older more expensive vets comes into play.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on November 23, 2024, 03:34:20 PM
the 3 down article about the stampeders decline https://3downnation.com/2024/11/23/literally-a-d-minus-former-calgary-stampeders-offer-scathing-assessment-of-franchise-in-decline/
is interesting One remark by Ormolade made that I felt has relevancy to the bombers is "In Toronto, even though we went 16-2 last year, we didn't win. They were like 'Oh, let's go get Jake Ceresna,'" Orimolade pointed out. "(The Stampeders) don't do stuff like that. You're going to have the constant decline of talent."
 If we want to remain on top we need to continuously try to improve especially with players that are near expiry date.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on November 23, 2024, 03:48:15 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 23, 2024, 02:51:44 PMA short list of players that might be SMS issues.

1. Ford. I have heard he has some new NFL tryouts. So that might be beyond our control.
2. Holm. He might be the next Houston where other teams offer more that we can compete with realistically.
3. Dobson. Re-signing good Canadians early in their careers is not always easy.
4. Lawler. Can we fit him into the SMS? Does he want more than in 2024?
5. Schoen. Same question as Lawler except he won't looking for a raise.

I think the rest of the potential free agents that we want to retain will be back. The question is how does the re-negotiating go for those in the list. In theory we were close to SMS cap, so there is not a lot of room to spend cumulatively more without something giving.

That's where the need to part ways with some older more expensive vets comes into play.
Don't think Lawler will ask for or deserves a raise, yes he had a good wf but 662 yds this year, 902 the year before despite being by far the primary target for Collaros doesn't warrant the salary hes making  (285k). He does make some great catches but the ability to stay healthy is a factor as well. Note his catch to target ration is also very low but that's a lot on Zac for forcing throws to him even when the completion probability is low and when Zac should be looking elsewhere.
If he wants more than 230k I'd let him walk and look elsewhere for 1 or even two free agents. (Schoen if he's healthy but that may be a big risk unless we have him on an incentive laden contract)


Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 23, 2024, 04:15:57 PM
Quote from: Pete on November 23, 2024, 03:48:15 PMDon't think Lawler will ask for or deserves a raise, yes he had a good wf but 662 yds this year, 902 the year before despite being by far the primary target for Collaros doesn't warrant the salary hes making  (285k). He does make some great catches but the ability to stay healthy is a factor as well. Note his catch to target ration is also very low but that's a lot on Zac for forcing throws to him even when the completion probability is low and when Zac should be looking elsewhere.
If he wants more than 230k I'd let him walk and look elsewhere for 1 or even two free agents. (Schoen if he's healthy but that may be a big risk unless we have him on an incentive laden contract)




I'd like to think we can get Lawler, Schoen and even Collaros to drop their contract levels. If we let them reach free agency it becomes a slippery slope.

We lose opportunities to move in another directions across the roster while we wait. After the 1st week of free agency those available are not usually the top players.

I think we need to know what their plans are before we reach free agency so we can react accordingly.

It's possible that some teams might still offer them more than we are prepared to pay.

I like the idea of incentive laden contracts for Schoen in particular.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on November 23, 2024, 04:19:57 PM
id be going after begelton if hes a FA, he's gotta want to get out of calgary s mess and go to a championship before his career is over

But there's all kinds of recievers out there for under $200k that can produce for us
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on November 23, 2024, 04:40:20 PM
unfortunately begelton isnt a free agent https://www.bgmsportstrax.com/2024/11/20/cfl-free-agency-2025-potential-list/
interesting free agents include; eugene Lewis, Coxiee. Tevon Jones, Hardy (who is exactly the type o reciever i think we could use,) Julian-Grant,Kiondre Smith, Mayala,Mcinnis
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 23, 2024, 05:02:17 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 23, 2024, 02:51:44 PMA short list of players that might be SMS issues.

1. Ford. I have heard he has some new NFL tryouts. So that might be beyond our control.
2. Holm. He might be the next Houston where other teams offer more that we can compete with realistically.
3. Dobson. Re-signing good Canadians early in their careers is not always easy.
4. Lawler. Can we fit him into the SMS? Does he want more than in 2024?
5. Schoen. Same question as Lawler except he won't looking for a raise.

I think the rest of the potential free agents that we want to retain will be back. The question is how does the re-negotiating go for those in the list. In theory we were close to SMS cap, so there is not a lot of room to spend cumulatively more without something giving.

That's where the need to part ways with some older more expensive vets comes into play.

The Bombers do have some expiring vets but they're not all making excess money, Kyrie, Jake Thomas, BA, Neufeld and the rest of the O-line are all making fair journeyman wages but nothing excessive that needs trimming. The exception maybe Stanley, who is probably still making in the neighbourhood of $200k.

The good news is few existing players will be looking for raises after this season, other than those coming off ELC's who will receive modest bumps + Ford and Holm who may be the biggest challenge.  Lawler, Schoen and Demski will either stand pat or take cuts, Willie can't ask for more, Kramdi and Nichols are set and the LB crew is all new so no new expenses there.  All in all, I'd say they're in a better financial state than they were going into this season.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 23, 2024, 05:25:43 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 23, 2024, 05:02:17 PMThe Bombers do have some expiring vets but they're not all making excess money, Kyrie, Jake Thomas, BA, Neufeld and the rest of the O-line are all making fair journeyman wages but nothing excessive that needs trimming. The exception maybe Stanley, who is probably still making in the neighbourhood of $200k.

The good news is few existing players will be looking for raises after this season, other than those coming off ELC's who will receive modest bumps + Ford and Holm who may be the biggest challenge.  Lawler, Schoen and Demski will either stand pat or take cuts, Willie can't ask for more, Kramdi and Nichols are set and the LB crew is all new so no new expenses there.  All in all, I'd say they're in a better financial state than they were going into this season.

Point and example about LB's. Jones and Cole are potential free agents. They might be looking at jumps from ELC to $100K. K. Wilson is probably above that or at the very least at that level. Bighill is above $100K Even if those 2 accept $85K that's still more than ELC and roster size doesn't allow to keep everyone on the AR.  It's SMS, ratio and roster.

So are you willing to release Wilson and / or Bighill in order to retain Jones and / or Cole?

As I've pointed out, even small increases for a bunch of those that are option year players ( 2 contract players ) means something has to be trimmed.

It doesn't really matter if some of those you mentioned are earning " fair " journeyman wages. The SMS is the SMS and for every $1 extra we have to find $1 less somewhere.

Someone suggested we might be able to re-sign Holm and Ford for $100K more in total. I'd don't agree it will be that little but lets say that evaluation is correct. Dobson might be another one in line for a $50K jump.

Where does the money for those 3 alone come from? Noting that if a player earning $150K is released, it's not a $150K reduction in SMS because you still would add an ELC player for roster size.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on November 23, 2024, 05:30:45 PM
Quote from: Pete on November 23, 2024, 04:40:20 PMunfortunately begelton isnt a free agent https://www.bgmsportstrax.com/2024/11/20/cfl-free-agency-2025-potential-list/
interesting free agents include; eugene Lewis, Coxiee. Tevon Jones, Hardy (who is exactly the type o reciever i think we could use,) Julian-Grant,Kiondre Smith, Mayala,Mcinnis
Dang. He would have been  a good one to pick up

Lewis is over paid and over rated. Coxie's a beast but doubt he leaves the big smoke. Hardy would be a nice pickup and he's got to want to get out of Ottawa.

 Not sure what type of $$ McInnis would want but he'd be awesome as well. If we're talking Schoen dollars, I m sure we could make it work, and the guy is always on the field vs in the hot tub.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 23, 2024, 05:37:14 PM
Quote from: dd on November 23, 2024, 05:30:45 PMDang. He would have been  a good one to pick up

Lewis is over paid and over rated. Coxie's a beast but doubt he leaves the big smoke. Hardy would be a nice pickup and he's got to want to get out of Ottawa.

 Not sure what type of $$ McInnis would want but he'd be awesome as well. If we're talking Schoen dollars, I m sure we could make it work, and the guy is always on the field vs in the hot tub.

McMinnis would be a great pick up but I don't think he leaves Toronto. If he did, he'd be another player we have to reduce our SMS spend elsewhere. Bighill SMS would be the gating differential to evaluate.

Adding very good players is not the issue, it's how to fit them into the SMS.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 23, 2024, 05:38:36 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 23, 2024, 05:25:43 PMPoint and example about LB's. Jones and Cole are potential free agents. They might be looking at jumps from ELC to $100K. K. Wilson is probably above that or at the very least at that level. Bighill is above $100K Even if those 2 accept $85K that's still more than ELC and roster size doesn't allow to keep everyone on the AR.  It's SMS, ratio and roster.

So are you willing to release Wilson and / or Bighill in order to retain Jones and / or Cole?

As I've pointed out, even small increases for a bunch of those that are option year players ( 2 contract players ) means something has to be trimmed.

It doesn't really matter if some of those you mentioned are earning " fair " journeyman wages. The SMS is the SMS and for every $1 extra we have to find $1 less somewhere.

Someone suggested we might be able to re-sign Holm and Ford for $100K more in total. I'd don't agree it will be that little but lets say that evaluation is correct.

Where does the money for those 2 alone come from?

I'm not worried about a few shekels here and there as I think they'll go over the SMS in the year of their GC, not excessively enough to lose a draft pick, but I see no problem exceeding the budget.

As for cuts to afford Ford and Holm, I think there's a good chance Ford goes elsewhere so they may only have to deal with Holm who I think will be appeased by $130-140k. 

Biggie and Bryant are making excess above journeyman wages, those are the two I would probably move on from based on the principle of age alone.  They'll be gone soon enough, why wait for the inevitable to happen when you can act on it?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 23, 2024, 06:04:44 PM
Quote from: dd on November 23, 2024, 05:30:45 PMDang. He would have been  a good one to pick up

Lewis is over paid and over rated. Coxie's a beast but doubt he leaves the big smoke. Hardy would be a nice pickup and he's got to want to get out of Ottawa.

 Not sure what type of $$ McInnis would want but he'd be awesome as well. If we're talking Schoen dollars, I m sure we could make it work, and the guy is always on the field vs in the hot tub.

Sure be nice to see a big sure-handed receiver like McInnis in the lineup, but he's pretty slow. Always thought finding the next iteration of Greg Ellingson would be the perfect fit.  Regardless unlikely to be any receiver positions up for grabs next season and a few like Clercius may have to take a step back and share a spot.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 23, 2024, 06:17:22 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 23, 2024, 05:38:36 PMI'm not worried about a few shekels here and there as I think they'll go over the SMS in the year of their GC, not excessively enough to lose a draft pick, but I see no problem exceeding the budget.

As for cuts to afford Ford and Holm, I think there's a good chance Ford goes elsewhere so they may only have to deal with Holm who I think will be appeased by $130-140k. 

Biggie and Bryant are making excess above journeyman wages, those are the two I would probably move on from based on the principle of age alone.  They'll be gone soon enough, why wait for the inevitable to happen when you can act on it?

Well I for one have no willingness to just go over the cap because it's a Grey Cup year. I also don't think it's part of what Miller / Walters will consider doing.

Moving on from Bighill I think is a very likely possibility. Moving on from Bryant, that's a tough one to contemplate. He's rarely missed a game or an assignment. As mentioned it is a Grey Cup in Winnipeg year. Perhaps not the year to release the best LT in CFL history?

If we lose Ford, which is a distinct possibility ( NFL or other ) then we don't need to worry too much about extra SMS for him. Although if we lose Ford, we may bring Parker back. He won't get a large raise, but he won't be ELC either.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 23, 2024, 06:26:13 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 23, 2024, 06:17:22 PMWell I for one have no willingness to just go over the cap because it's a Grey Cup year. I also don't think it's part of what Miller / Walters will consider doing.

You're on one side of the spectrum on exceeding SMS spending, Aards and Techno are on the other side, I'm firmly in the middle. ;D
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 23, 2024, 07:47:01 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 23, 2024, 06:26:13 PMYou're on one side of the spectrum on exceeding SMS spending, Aards and Techno are on the other side, I'm firmly in the middle. ;D

Start a poll and see where other posters are? Like I said though, it's not the way of the organization.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on November 23, 2024, 09:47:14 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 23, 2024, 07:47:01 PMStart a poll and see where other posters are? Like I said though, it's not the way of the organization.

Disagree. They'll absolutely push the chips in when needed.

I think some people misinterpret what "going over the cap" means. You're not spending it all before the season starts and then every injury pushes you further and further over. But teams in certain circumstances will allow less room than normal (like we did when we signed Brady and Schoen) or go over to get an available player back (Like BC did with Rourke and Betts).
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 24, 2024, 01:15:24 PM
Quote from: Jesse on November 23, 2024, 09:47:14 PMDisagree. They'll absolutely push the chips in when needed.

I think some people misinterpret what "going over the cap" means. You're not spending it all before the season starts and then every injury pushes you further and further over. But teams in certain circumstances will allow less room than normal (like we did when we signed Brady and Schoen) or go over to get an available player back (Like BC did with Rourke and Betts).

No, there were suggestions were about intentionally going over the SMS by $100K+. IIRC someone mentioned by as much as just under $300K  The rest all falls into contingency planning that every team does. Going all in throwing caution to the wind in a Grey Cup year at home.

It's not often a player that wants $750K per season is returning mid season.  When have we seen a Bomber returning from the NFL. Ford returned but he was still under contract and it for at TC not during the season.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on November 24, 2024, 01:53:54 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 24, 2024, 01:15:24 PMNo, there were suggestions were about intentionally going over the SMS by $100K+. IIRC someone mentioned by as much as just under $300K  The rest all falls into contingency planning that every team does. Going all in throwing caution to the wind in a Grey Cup year at home.

It's not often a player that wants $750K per season is returning mid season.  When have we seen a Bomber returning from the NFL. Ford returned but he was still under contract and it for at TC not during the season.

Discussions by people who don't understand how it works.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 28, 2024, 05:18:49 PM
Ok, lets get on with getting some ink to paper on a few of our players.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 28, 2024, 05:36:16 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on November 28, 2024, 05:18:49 PMOk, lets get on with getting some ink to paper on a few of our players.

As Walters indicated not much likely to happen until they have their coaching staff finalized.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on November 28, 2024, 07:33:05 PM
2025 Blue Bombers Free Agent Tracker (https://www.cfl.ca/official-2025-free-agent-tracker/#BOMBERS)
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 28, 2024, 10:08:38 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 28, 2024, 05:36:16 PMAs Walters indicated not much likely to happen until they have their coaching staff finalized.

Every player was probably rated after every game this season but the cumulative effort of the coaches. I doubt there is much secret about who they want to retain.

At the moment we haven't lost any staff, in particular Younger. There is a significant list of defensive players on our list.

Regardless, we should be speaking with some of the high profile players to get an indication if a new contract is possible.

In many cases, it's a matter of money and whether a given player intends to explore free agency.

We could sign Ford tomorrow if a financial deal could be agreed to by both parties. You could say re-signing him doesn't need further approval from any possible coaching changes. It's just an SMS issue and agreement from him to stay.

Similarly the same holds true to others like Bryant, Holm etc etc.

I'd go further to suggest that some decisions may have already been made about not re-signing a few players. Those won't necessarily fall into SMS issues per se but the desire to move forward with some of the younger players.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on November 28, 2024, 11:16:12 PM
I'd be kicking the tires on Betts, he'd help our D line like right now. He probably wants big bucks, but I'd still see if he could fit within our SMS, but BC's doing it with Couture, Chung, Rourke etc.etc.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on November 29, 2024, 07:18:39 PM
Apparently Tyrell Ford made a comment to Jeff Hamilton saying he wanted to be paid more than his brother.

I'm expecting his agent to try and reset the market the way Kenny did for receivers when he signed with Edmonton. He's going to be one of those guys that's almost impossible to sign and has people asking if it's worth it even if we do.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: markf on November 29, 2024, 07:56:40 PM
Who , when, was the last big name player from another team signed?

free agent or trade.

Collaros?

Don't seem to operate that way lately.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 29, 2024, 07:57:25 PM
Quote from: Jesse on November 29, 2024, 07:18:39 PMApparently Tyrell Ford made a comment to Jeff Hamilton saying he wanted to be paid more than his brother.

I'm expecting his agent to try and reset the market the way Kenny did for receivers when he signed with Edmonton. He's going to be one of those guys that's almost impossible to sign and has people asking if it's worth it even if we do.

Thing is most GM's did not follow suite, I believe Walters is the only other GM that has paid a receivers more than $250k.  Ford may get $150k from somebody but nobody in the CFL is likely to pay a DB $200k.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on November 29, 2024, 11:27:19 PM
Quote from: markf on November 29, 2024, 07:56:40 PMWho , when, was the last big name player from another team signed?

free agent or trade.

Collaros?

Don't seem to operate that way lately.

We got the core of our talent pool from other teams either by trade or FA signing-Collaros, bighill, Jefferson, Demski and Lawler. Some are nearing the end of 5eir careers ie bighill and Collaros, and when they do retire, we ll be dipping back into the FA pool again, maybe not for bighill but definitely for a #1 Qb. I m hoping zach stays with us for another year or 2 at least.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: markf on November 30, 2024, 12:35:59 AM
Quote from: dd on November 29, 2024, 11:27:19 PMWe got the core of our talent pool from other teams either by trade or FA signing-Collaros, bighill, Jefferson, Demski and Lawler. Some are nearing the end of 5eir careers ie bighill and Collaros, and when they do retire, we ll be dipping back into the FA pool again, maybe not for bighill but definitely for a #1 Qb. I m hoping zach stays with us for another year or 2 at least.

good list, and good point,  but don't forget Harris!

I just meant that they have been happy with the players they have for the last few years, Since signing the players you mentioned.

I don't think they will change much this off season. (watch them make a big move tomorrow lol.)
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on November 30, 2024, 02:59:03 AM
Yes, management has definitely recruited very well, both in FA, down south and in the draft. They recruit players of good character and being a good teammate and  everything else looks after itself. Guys who are all about themselves ,move on goodbye Mr Grant. And head cases never see the light of day. I had a coach once who said in training camp when addressing the team Day 1 that if you aren't all about being a good teammate and the team, then we are both wasting eachothers time. He said that during recruiting you but him saying it to the greater group solidified its all about the team, and our team  wasn't the most talented, but definitely punched well above our weight and over achieved and it is no mystery why.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on November 30, 2024, 04:06:00 PM
Ly top non qb salaries on bombers (excluding Brady)
Lawler 285
Schoen  225
Demski 225
Willie 200
Bryant 170
Neufeld 145 (guess)
Total 1,250,000

If you could redistribute salaries who would you go for?
My choices (max I'd pay)
LaWler  230 (if not then Schoen 200k)
Demski  190
Bryant  170
Willie   200
Ceresna  240
Williams 195 (replaces neufeld)

Total 1,225,000k

W
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on November 30, 2024, 05:51:09 PM
Quote from: Pete on November 30, 2024, 04:06:00 PMLy top non qb salaries on bombers (excluding Brady)
Lawler 285
Schoen  225
Demski 225
Willie 200
Bryant 170
Neufeld 145 (guess)
Total 1,250,000

If you could redistribute salaries who would you go for?
My choices (max I'd pay)
LaWler  230 (if not then Schoen 200k)
Demski  190
Bryant  170
Willie   200
Ceresna  240
Williams 195 (replaces neufeld)

Total 1,225,000k

W

I don't think I'd pay Jefferson $200K any longer. He disappears for long stretches during the season. Also don't think Ceresna is worth $240K although he'll  probably get somewhere close.

Too many players being paid excess amounts in SMS's across the CFL.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: DM83 on December 01, 2024, 09:42:40 PM
Kind of a bunch of sheep posting in the forum.
Mind you all reasonable prognostications.  Too many based on the past.
Some one come to your senses.

The d line and the d coordinator are not winners. That is it. A three man line, ***** coverage by DBs and no clue line backers coupled with deer in the headlites d coordinator.   Collaros has also sucked the last three grey cups. Plus zero back experience.  Does not look good for the future.

Schoen better be healed and come back in shape, not the extra 30 pounds he had after failing on the NFL. Collaros better get in shape. Can he even throw a corner pattern anymore?  Did we see any this past season?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on December 01, 2024, 11:47:40 PM
The grinch has arrived!
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on December 02, 2024, 03:23:11 AM
This might be the year we should lean toward performance based contracts. In the past OShea/Walters have shied away from significant bonus-based salaries as the focus has always been on team performance. However, the question marks we have on our roster are significant in terms of paying them even close to ly.

Lawler hasn't had 1000 yds past 3 seasons He's still one of the best receivers in terms of ability  but hasn't played more than 12 games for the past 4 years.  If he's going to be paid as one of the top three receivers he needs to produce results.

Schoen -  Can he recover to the level prior to his injury? Can we risk 200k plus that he can.

Bighill - Is no longer a 165k linebacker. Age and injury tell us that he's on a downward spiral

Jefferson -I'm less inclined not to match his ly salary as evidenced by his grey cup performance and he was very much impacted by Youngers defensive strategy of only rushing 3. He is getting longer in the tooth though.

As Walters said no player wants to take a pay cut but what I would suggest is build in significant incentives as part of their salary and if they achieve them even if it puts us over the cap It would be worth it.


Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on December 02, 2024, 03:39:10 AM
Quote from: DM83 on December 01, 2024, 09:42:40 PMKind of a bunch of sheep posting in the forum.
Mind you all reasonable prognostications.  Too many based on the past.
Some one come to your senses.

The d line and the d coordinator are not winners. That is it. A three man line, ***** coverage by DBs and no clue line backers coupled with deer in the headlites d coordinator.    Collaros has also sucked the last three grey cups. Plus zero back experience.  Does not look good for the future.

Schoen better be healed and come back in shape, not the extra 30 pounds he had after failing on the NFL. Collaros better get in shape. Can he even throw a corner pattern anymore?  Did we see any this past season?
The same person that claimed we should fire Hall, MOS and our management sucked pre mini dynasty.  Your take wasn't right pre dynasty and isn't now imo.  You are welcome to post as you please but there is nothing in your post that I agree with.

Our DC is good and will be great.  Your post about him is highly disrespectful and please consider taking that out.

Zach was up and down this year but over his time here; he has been brilliant.  Yes he can throw a corner route.

Schoen is great, yes needs to come back strong and healthy.

The dline was good this year with new faces stepping up and our vets played well.  We have had a top defense many years running.
Our linebackers were good.  Jones is a gamer and Kramdi continues to develop.  Our DBs were exceptional after a slow start.
3 man front is a trend across the league and worked well, we laid an egg at the GC all phases and coaching.

Not a lot of depth at QB this year but we had Brown previously who was developing well.  Hopefully we can do that again (tall order).


My take from earlier posts:

Jefferson worth every penny imo.  Dobson, a keeper.  I would throw a big offer at Ford.  He is a generational talent (aided by his passport).  Will cost too much.  Good ones always do.

Quote from: Blue In BC on November 21, 2024, 04:24:38 PM
My notes on right
1. Augustine, I would keep him
2. Benson, no opinion
3. Bighill, too $
4. Feltmate, no opinion
5. Gauthier, likely time but good depth guy still and good on ST
6. Nick Hallett, no opinion
7. Noah Hallett, no opinion
8. Neufeld, keep
9. Streveler, pass
10. Thomas, reduced roll?
11. K. Wilson, pass but love him
12. Wolitarski, keep
13. Dolegala, no opinion
14. Whitehead, pass
15. Parker, keep if lose others
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on December 02, 2024, 01:42:46 PM
Quote from: Blueforlife on December 02, 2024, 03:39:10 AMThe same person that claimed we should fire Hall, MOS and our management sucked pre mini dynasty.  Your take wasn't right pre dynasty and isn't now imo.  You are welcome to post as you please but there is nothing in your post that I agree with.

Our DC is good and will be great.  Your post about him is highly disrespectful and please consider taking that out.

Zach was up and down this year but over his time here; he has been brilliant.  Yes he can throw a corner route.

Schoen is great, yes needs to come back strong and healthy.

The dline was good this year with new faces stepping up and our vets played well.  We have had a top defense many years running.
Our linebackers were good.  Jones is a gamer and Kramdi continues to develop.  Our DBs were exceptional after a slow start.
3 man front is a trend across the league and worked well, we laid an egg at the GC all phases and coaching.

Not a lot of depth at QB this year but we had Brown previously who was developing well.  Hopefully we can do that again (tall order).


My take from earlier posts:

Jefferson worth every penny imo.  Dobson, a keeper.  I would throw a big offer at Ford.  He is a generational talent (aided by his passport).  Will cost too much.  Good ones always do.

Quote from: Blue In BC on November 21, 2024, 04:24:38 PM
My notes on right
1. Augustine, I would keep him
2. Benson, no opinion
3. Bighill, too $
4. Feltmate, no opinion
5. Gauthier, likely time but good depth guy still and good on ST
6. Nick Hallett, no opinion
7. Noah Hallett, no opinion
8. Neufeld, keep
9. Streveler, pass
10. Thomas, reduced roll?
11. K. Wilson, pass but love him
12. Wolitarski, keep
13. Dolegala, no opinion
14. Whitehead, pass
15. Parker, keep if lose others


It's not going to be easy making these decisions. SMS and how we save whatever is necessary to sign the others. Retaining Canadians falls at the top of the list. We have some 2024 draft picks returning for TC and then the new 2025 draft picks to consider.  So the team has to figure out who in that group replaces current roster choices.  A few draft choices return to school and a few will sit on the PR. However, some will make the AR and there will be some departures from the 2024 roster.

Free agency will tell us something as will the draft this season.


1. Augustine. Last I recall is he was making about $110K. Good ST player but never going to be full time RB. Chris-Ike is the wildcard for a larger role?
4. Feltmate was a good ST player and might be necessary if we choose to part with Gauthier. Chris-Ike is the wildcard for a larger role?
5. Gauthier. Another good depth guy whose role has diminished. SMS and role are the questions.
8. Neufeld. A tough call and might be decided on what happens with free agency acquisitions. If we lose Dobson that changes the equation.
10. Thomas. We'll have Lawson returning and can't keep everybody.
12. Woli. Never heard exactly what his injury was but that's a huge concern. Keep if healthy and SMS works.
15. Parker may be needed if we lose Holm and / or Ford.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on December 02, 2024, 06:40:21 PM
Nice to hear Bryant  is on board for another season.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on December 02, 2024, 06:42:57 PM
Round 2 to previous comment above. Six of those Canadians played on our ST's and most seemed to play reasonably well.

I don't have any idea of how much any were earning other than previous reports of what Augustine was earning. Now whether he's expecting more or would accept a lower offer is somewhat the question.

He's fairly fast compared to a bunch of the others so I'm not opposed to him returning at the right price. The same goes for Gauthier to a similar degree.

Neither can be expected to be the primary back up any longer IMO as the age clock keeps on ticking.

Neufeld and Woli are different situations since both were starters and have been with the team for a longtime as starters.

It comes down to injury ( for Woli ) and age possibly for Neufeld. Both could be back and play well.There may be other potential free agents available in February that are younger, might be less expensive and have higher upside.

All this just makes free agency interesting in seeing how things shake out.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on December 02, 2024, 06:43:37 PM
The tampering period allows a player to get his best offer, and allow us to match.

If someone is going to "spend too much" on Ford, why not us?

Let him let other GM's set the price, and we can either matchg or come close enough...

As to any concept of a DB making more than a QB, its not going to be that the DB gets QB money... if he does get a shot in the NFL, he will make more than Tre, but in the CFL, not likely...
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on December 02, 2024, 08:00:47 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on December 02, 2024, 06:43:37 PMThe tampering period allows a player to get his best offer, and allow us to match.

If someone is going to "spend too much" on Ford, why not us?

Let him let other GM's set the price, and we can either matchg or come close enough...

As to any concept of a DB making more than a QB, its not going to be that the DB gets QB money... if he does get a shot in the NFL, he will make more than Tre, but in the CFL, not likely...

The same as every off season. Another team might have a greater need and an ability to fit an outrageous salary into their SMS.

Bombers have chosen to let top players like Desjarlais or C. Sayles leave for high salaries.

IDK how much other teams might offer Tyrell Ford to move. IDK if he has more NFL opportunities. We certainly want to re-sign him but there will be a line we won't move past.

Tryell suggesting he wants to earn more than Tre is an interesting comment but it isn't reality.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on December 02, 2024, 08:39:22 PM
The other issue is the closer it gets to free agency the more you seem to play.
Mtrl is a good example of a team thats got ahead of it signing Beverette, most of their recievers and dline/ linebackers
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on December 02, 2024, 09:12:25 PM
Quote from: Pete on December 02, 2024, 08:39:22 PMThe other issue is the closer it gets to free agency the more you seem to play.
Mtrl is a good example of a team thats got ahead of it signing Beverette, most of their recievers and dline/ linebackers

It's a factor to some degree but difficult to assess how much of a factor. For players that have been here for an extended time, they will probably prefer to stay than move. Players like Ford, Holm and Dobson are not long long term Bombers.

That may result in them going to the highest bidder. I know Walters said not much was going to happen until coaches were settled. I don't really think that's the complete picture.

Re-signing Bryant is an example of that. IMO we'll see some long time Bombers we want back re-signed in the next couple of weeks.

I just can't honestly say who we might choose to move on from quite yet.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on December 02, 2024, 09:38:36 PM
Now that Walters knows exactly how much 2024 cap was spent, he knw how much signing bonus money he has available without costing a draft pick.  And we need to spend every penny of it on re-signing sure thing players.

Like Bryant.

Every penny of the cap + the $100k contingency that just costs a fine.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TecnoGenius on December 03, 2024, 04:31:47 AM
Quote from: DM83 on December 01, 2024, 09:42:40 PMSchoen better be healed and come back in shape, not the extra 30 pounds he had after failing on the NFL. Collaros better get in shape. Can he even throw a corner pattern anymore?  Did we see any this past season?

He threw tons of corners for the first 2/3 of the season, the problem was they mostly all failed because teams know Buck/Zach love that corner in the redzone, so they all protected against it pretty well.

We did much better when we started throwing that mid/flat Zach-on-rollout TD.  Only TOR found a way to defend against it (in the GC, grrrrrr).
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TecnoGenius on December 03, 2024, 04:40:51 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 23, 2024, 05:38:36 PMI'm not worried about a few shekels here and there as I think they'll go over the SMS in the year of their GC, not excessively enough to lose a draft pick, but I see no problem exceeding the budget.

KW said in his most recent status-of-team presser that he was not going to change squat for the home GC year.  I believe him.

However, I think WM & Mafia need to evaluate things long and hard when it is revealed BC went $300k over in 2024.  (Wade can push KW to be more aggressive.)  They also need to evaluate the use of the 100% SMS-free "marketing" money scam.

I think whatever BC did in 2024 we should match (or get within 50% of) in 2025.  Push the limits of all the loopholes and tricks.  Losing a 2RDP and/or 1RDP isn't the end of the world since ours will be near the end of the round anyhow (gonna make the cup again!).  If we draft some great OL in the '25 draft, '26 may not be as critical.

If BC is getting away with Rourke getting $200k "marketing" then Zach should be getting $200k "marketing".  Regardless of what Ambrosie said, it's all going to be loosey-goosey.  Just "justify" it to some degree and it's A-OK.

There could be lots of teams having overages & "marketing" this FA once the truth is told on what BC did.  This will be an arms race and we don't want to fall behind.  We're the "richest" team, so out of everyone it should impact us the least.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TecnoGenius on December 03, 2024, 04:45:55 AM
Quote from: Pete on November 23, 2024, 04:40:20 PMeugene Lewis, Coxiee. Tevon Jones, Hardy (who is exactly the type o reciever i think we could use,) Julian-Grant,Kiondre Smith, Mayala,Mcinnis

Hardy would be absolutely perfect!  Great catch.

We have a plethora of speed/skinny.  What we need is the Bailey/Schoen bruiser who can make the catch while getting hit and hang on.  See: the pathetic '24 GC dropsies.

Just think of how much better the GC would have gone if Woli/Schoen(/Bailey) were in there to actually hang onto those tough catches?  Clercius isn't there yet, and Wheatie is basically a Pokey/Kenny-lite.

Hardy is a tough you know what who would make those catches.  If we don't re-sign Schoen, it'll be even more important to obtain some tough guys.

If we can't get Hardy, who else is in FA in the same mold?  McInnis is too tall for me and there's no reason or money to pay for the NAT status.  IMP will always be cheaper at the same talent level.  And McInnis was pretty useless once teams figured him out mid-season (around the time we destroyed BC).
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TecnoGenius on December 03, 2024, 04:48:24 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on November 22, 2024, 07:05:57 PMRandolph proved himself in game so they'll likely keep him, don't think they need another import OL unless they're willing to sit on the PR waiting for their turn.

Randolph clearly is not ready for OT though.  We'll need a dev/backup IMP OT for TC/PR, especially if Neufeld (the best backup OT) isn't here.

We also need to be finding the next Big Stan (and RT too), hopefully dev'ing them ourselves, otherwise it'll be a panic FA $$ splash when Stan finally retires.

As for starters, my money is on Lofton at RT again.  He ended the season "good enough", especially for the budget price!
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: VictorRomano on December 03, 2024, 03:31:36 PM
Quote from: TecnoGenius on December 03, 2024, 04:48:24 AMRandolph clearly is not ready for OT though.

Pretty sure Randolph slotted in as a guard 90% of the time he was on the game day roster. 

Week 1 - Backup right guard behind Neuf
Week 2 - Backup right guard behind Neuf
Week 3 - Backup right guard behind Neuf
Week 4 - Backup right guard behind Neuf
Week 5 - Backup right guard behind Neuf
Week 6 - Backup right guard behind Neuf
Week 7 - Backup right guard behind Neuf
Week 8 - Backup right guard behind Neuf
Week 9 - Backup right guard behind Neuf
Week 10 - bye
Week 11 - Backup right guard behind Neuf
Week 12 - Backup right guard behind Wallace
Week 13 - Starting left tackle
week 14 - Starting left tackle
Week 15 - bye
Week 16 - Backup right guard behind Neuf
Week 17 - 1 game IR
wEEK 18 - 1 game IR
Week 19 - 1 game IR
Week 20 - bye
Week 21 - Backup right guard behind Neuf
Western Final - Backup right guard to Neuf
Grey Cup - Backup right guard to Neuf

He was generally used as the 6th (or 7th) OL for Jumbo sets.  We also won both the games he started at LT (Banjo Bowl and Labor Day Classic) after Big Stan went down with the flu.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on December 03, 2024, 04:10:14 PM
Quote from: VictorRomano on December 03, 2024, 03:31:36 PMPretty sure Randolph slotted in as a guard 90% of the time he was on the game day roster. 

Week 1 - Backup right guard behind Neuf
Week 2 - Backup right guard behind Neuf
Week 3 - Backup right guard behind Neuf
Week 4 - Backup right guard behind Neuf
Week 5 - Backup right guard behind Neuf
Week 6 - Backup right guard behind Neuf
Week 7 - Backup right guard behind Neuf
Week 8 - Backup right guard behind Neuf
Week 9 - Backup right guard behind Neuf
Week 10 - bye
Week 11 - Backup right guard behind Neuf
Week 12 - Backup right guard behind Wallace
Week 13 - Starting left tackle
week 14 - Starting left tackle
Week 15 - bye
Week 16 - Backup right guard behind Neuf
Week 17 - 1 game IR
wEEK 18 - 1 game IR
Week 19 - 1 game IR
Week 20 - bye
Week 21 - Backup right guard behind Neuf
Western Final - Backup right guard to Neuf
Grey Cup - Backup right guard to Neuf

He was generally used as the 6th (or 7th) OL for Jumbo sets.  We also won both the games he started at LT (Banjo Bowl and Labor Day Classic) after Big Stan went down with the flu.

Depth charts showing where the back up lines up doesn't mean too much. For a 1st year import it might be an easier initial transition. However their actual role while on the AR was on the outside of the OL as 6th man fronts. So playing the edge rather than the interior of the OL per se.

At the moment we expect both Randolph and Vanterpool back in TC. Normally we'll see quite a few import OL added to the TC roster with some only here briefly.

These two have the initial edge to survive TC and move back to the PR or AR if we have an early injury.

I think the expectation is that import OL are expected to see more long term duty as possible OT's. Canadian OL mostly end up in the interior.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: tlf on December 03, 2024, 04:51:37 PM
Quote from: Pete on November 30, 2024, 04:06:00 PMLy top non qb salaries on bombers (excluding Brady)
Lawler 285     
Schoen  225     
Demski 225   
Willie 200
Bryant 170
Neufeld 145 (guess)
Total 1,250,000

If you could redistribute salaries who would you go for?
My choices (max I'd pay)
LaWler  230 (if not then Schoen 200k)
Demski  190
Bryant  170
Willie   200
Ceresna  240
Williams 195 (replaces neufeld)

Total 1,225,000k

W

Yes to Lawler
Unsure about Schoen..although when he's healthy..watch out.
Demski..I'm unsure.  Part of me would rather have Bailey back.
Willie YES to the knockdown king
Bryant of course
Neufeld YES

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 03, 2024, 05:22:13 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 03, 2024, 04:10:14 PMDepth charts showing where the back up lines up doesn't mean too much. For a 1st year import it might be an easier initial transition. However their actual role while on the AR was on the outside of the OL as 6th man fronts. So playing the edge rather than the interior of the OL per se.

At the moment we expect both Randolph and Vanterpool back in TC. Normally we'll see quite a few import OL added to the TC roster with some only here briefly.

These two have the initial edge to survive TC and move back to the PR or AR if we have an early injury.

I think the expectation is that import OL are expected to see more long term duty as possible OT's. Canadian OL mostly end up in the interior.

In one of the  photo galleries the Bombers had up on their website during GC week there was a photo of the entire O-line plus backups and coaching staff, it showed one unknown Import O-lineman on the left side of the photo with a full beard that was even bigger than Wallace. 

The photos galleries are gone now but turns out his name was Chris Walker and he was around 6'-6" 325 lbs out of Montana. I checked at the time and saw that he was added to the PR for a few weeks, so he must have been in town for a late season look-see. Hope to see him back.

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GZFCqRpbYAAoiUe?format=jpg&name=medium)
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Stats Junkie on December 03, 2024, 05:27:27 PM
Quote from: VictorRomano on December 03, 2024, 03:31:36 PMPretty sure Randolph slotted in as a guard 90% of the time he was on the game day roster. 

Week 1 - Backup right guard behind Neuf - Practice Roster
Week 2 - Backup right guard behind Neuf - Practice Roster
Week 3 - Backup right guard behind Neuf - Practice Roster
Week 4 - Backup right guard behind Neuf - Practice Roster
Week 5 - Backup right guard behind Neuf - Practice Roster
Week 6 - Backup right guard behind Neuf - Practice Roster
Week 7 - Backup right guard behind Neuf - Practice Roster
Week 8 - Backup right guard behind Neuf - Practice Roster
Week 9 - Backup right guard behind Neuf - Starting RG
Week 10 - bye
Week 11 - Backup right guard behind Neuf - Starting RG
Week 12 - Backup right guard behind Wallace - Starting RG - Moved to LT when Bryant went down
Week 13 - Starting left tackle
week 14 - Starting left tackle
Week 15 - bye
Week 16 - Backup right guard behind Neuf
Week 17 - 1 game IR - Practice Roster
wEEK 18 - 1 game IR - Practice Roster
Week 19 - 1 game IR - Practice Roster
Week 20 - bye
Week 21 - Backup right guard behind Neuf - 1-game IL
Western Final - Backup right guard behind Neuf - 1-game IL
Grey Cup - Backup right guard behind Neuf - 1-game IL

He was generally used as the 6th (or 7th) OL for Jumbo sets.  We also won both the games he started at LT (Banjo Bowl and Labor Day Classic) after Big Stan went down with the flu.
Randolph started 5 of the 6 games he dressed for - nearly 3 full games at LT.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TecnoGenius on December 04, 2024, 07:15:34 AM
Quote from: Stats Junkie on December 03, 2024, 05:27:27 PMRandolph started 5 of the 6 games he dressed for - nearly 3 full games at LT.

The LT games were horribly stinky, with whiff city by Randolph.

The RG games were astoundingly good and so many problems instantly disappeared with Randolph at RG.

I'm not sure what his natural position is, but he's not starting LT material right now.  Maybe he can become one.  But he needs more dev.

I see no reason we can't keep 2 IMP OL on AR/PR.  One should be with an eye to LT/RT succession.  The other can be Randolph for 3rd IMP or injury options.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: drahgon on December 04, 2024, 04:52:43 PM
Tony Jones back in blue and gold
https://3downnation.com/2024/12/04/winnipeg-blue-bombers-re-sign-lb-tony-jones-through-2026/ (https://3downnation.com/2024/12/04/winnipeg-blue-bombers-re-sign-lb-tony-jones-through-2026/)

Does this mean the writing is on the wall for AB4?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on December 04, 2024, 04:53:03 PM
Quote from: drahgon on December 04, 2024, 04:52:43 PMTony Jones back in blue and gold
https://3downnation.com/2024/12/04/winnipeg-blue-bombers-re-sign-lb-tony-jones-through-2026/ (https://3downnation.com/2024/12/04/winnipeg-blue-bombers-re-sign-lb-tony-jones-through-2026/)

YES!
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on December 04, 2024, 04:58:30 PM
Good news!

https://www.cfl.ca/2024/12/04/bombers-sign-lb-tony-jones-to-two-year-extension/
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on December 04, 2024, 05:19:38 PM
Getting Jones back on a 2 year deal is excellent. I wouldn't say it bodes well for either Bighill or Wilson returning. It's possible but this is a change in direction for the future.

If I had to choose either Bighill or Wilson, I'd choose Bighill if a reasonable 1 year deal can be worked out. I've suggested he'd be a great solution as a DI that could step in as an in game starter if necessary. He's also had more healthy career than Wilson who at this point misses more games than he can play.

However, we still need to see whether we re-sign Cole. Ayers could have a role and I'd expect him to progress his performance in 2025.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: VictorRomano on December 04, 2024, 09:02:14 PM
Quote from: Stats Junkie on December 03, 2024, 05:27:27 PMRandolph started 5 of the 6 games he dressed for - nearly 3 full games at LT.

Weird discrepancies.  I went back deep into the Bombers website and looked at every single game day roster as published by the BB media department for the 2024 season, which is where I pulled all this data from.  I will defer to your judgement, though, as I did not attend or have the opportunity to watch every game this season.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Stats Junkie on December 05, 2024, 07:55:14 PM
Quote from: VictorRomano on December 04, 2024, 09:02:14 PMWeird discrepancies.  I went back deep into the Bombers website and looked at every single game day roster as published by the BB media department for the 2024 season, which is where I pulled all this data from.  I will defer to your judgement, though, as I did not attend or have the opportunity to watch every game this season.
I used the depth charts published by the Blue Bombers in 2024 - available on bluebombers.com (https://www.bluebombers.com/2024-depth-position-charts/). I randomly checked a few of the games and the details match the updates that I provided above.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Ridermania on December 06, 2024, 01:10:21 PM
Tyrell Ford works out for the Saints.

https://3downnation.com/2024/12/05/winnipeg-blue-bombers-db-tyrell-ford-works-out-for-new-orleans-saints-sources/
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: GOLDMEMBER on December 06, 2024, 02:28:32 PM
Quote from: drahgon on December 04, 2024, 04:52:43 PMTony Jones back in blue and gold
https://3downnation.com/2024/12/04/winnipeg-blue-bombers-re-sign-lb-tony-jones-through-2026/ (https://3downnation.com/2024/12/04/winnipeg-blue-bombers-re-sign-lb-tony-jones-through-2026/)

Does this mean the writing is on the wall for AB4?
A  great resigning. I think we'll see amazing g things from this guy!
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: markf on December 06, 2024, 02:53:16 PM
Not surprised by T Ford getting an NFL tryout.

I wont be surprised if he gets a job there.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on December 06, 2024, 03:07:41 PM
Quote from: markf on December 06, 2024, 02:53:16 PMNot surprised by T Ford getting an NFL tryout.

I wont be surprised if he gets a job there.

IMO it's still a long shot. The catch is that this time, if he returns he is no longer under contract with the Bombers. Potentially returning mid season makes fitting him into a CFL roster SMS will be more difficult. It's not impossible but not every team will be able to achieve that.

Ford will be turning 27 in March and is only 5'11". He's not exactly the kind of player the NFL likes at CB. IIRC wasn't he tried out more as an inside safety player in 2023?

Either way, there will be dozens of NFL draft choices which will have an edge.

From a Bomber perspective, he has longer to decide on any NFL opportunities since he becomes a complete free agent in February. In that sense, the Bombers may need to move on with other choices including CFL free agency etc etc.

I'd like him back and understand his NFL wish, but at some point we'll have a spot to fill in the secondary.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on December 06, 2024, 03:19:11 PM
 don't think the WFC needs to make any drastic choices to cover for his potential sticking in the NFL.  We always have "next man up" in the DB's, and have already signed a couple potential replacements.

If he sticks, we will be fine.  If he doesn't, we should have space to bring him back...
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on December 06, 2024, 03:26:42 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on December 06, 2024, 03:19:11 PMdon't think the WFC needs to make any drastic choices to cover for his potential sticking in the NFL.  We always have "next man up" in the DB's, and have already signed a couple potential replacements.

If he sticks, we will be fine.  If he doesn't, we should have space to bring him back...

We've had success finding new DB's. Having SMS space and needing to compete with other CFL teams provides no certainty he'd be back.

Obviously we've speculated that he'll be looking for $150K-$200K ( too much IMO ) but that's a side question.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on December 06, 2024, 03:35:16 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 06, 2024, 03:26:42 PMWe've had success finding new DB's. Having SMS space and needing to compete with other CFL teams provides no certainty he'd be back.

Obviously we've speculated that he'll be looking for $150K-$200K ( too much IMO ) but that's a side question.

Miller will be waiving $SMS concerns this year, I have no doubt.

Making Ford the highest paid DB in the league is fine with me.

There will be space on the roster as anyone we bring in to fight for his spot can be PR'd.

Don't sign a high profile FA to fill his spot, is all I'm saying,  Make some ELC rooks fight for it, and if he comes back, his space (roster and cap) are there.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 06, 2024, 03:50:15 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 06, 2024, 03:07:41 PMIMO it's still a long shot. The catch is that this time, if he returns he is no longer under contract with the Bombers. Potentially returning mid season makes fitting him into a CFL roster SMS will be more difficult. It's not impossible but not every team will be able to achieve that.

Ford will be turning 27 in March and is only 5'11". He's not exactly the kind of player the NFL likes at CB. IIRC wasn't he tried out more as an inside safety player in 2023?

Either way, there will be dozens of NFL draft choices which will have an edge.

From a Bomber perspective, he has longer to decide on any NFL opportunities since he becomes a complete free agent in February. In that sense, the Bombers may need to move on with other choices including CFL free agency etc etc.

I'd like him back and understand his NFL wish, but at some point we'll have a spot to fill in the secondary.

I would focus on re-signing Holm asap while Ford hems and haws on his direction as he's likely to string that decision out as long as possible like he's done before.  They lost Alford to the NFL in 2021 and didn't skip a beat.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on December 06, 2024, 04:34:10 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on December 06, 2024, 03:35:16 PMMiller will be waiving $SMS concerns this year, I have no doubt.

Making Ford the highest paid DB in the league is fine with me.

There will be space on the roster as anyone we bring in to fight for his spot can be PR'd.

Don't sign a high profile FA to fill his spot, is all I'm saying,  Make some ELC rooks fight for it, and if he comes back, his space (roster and cap) are there.

You keep spinning the idea that the Bombers will have no regard for the SMS. I disagree and think this is just another of your tin hat ideas. Class organizations don't do that.

I also don't think Ford is worth being the highest paid DB in the CFL.

Suggesting we just wait until he returns is not a smart idea since it's possible he may not return at all. It's not usual for the Bombers to look to sign high profile free agent, but it's not impossible.

Preferably we spend some SMS on the DL which has been an issue.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on December 06, 2024, 04:39:49 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 06, 2024, 03:50:15 PMI would focus on re-signing Holm asap while Ford hems and haws on his direction as he's likely to string that decision out as long as possible like he's done before.  They lost Alford to the NFL in 2021 and didn't skip a beat.

Fair assessment. The Bombers will have a pretty good idea about whether Ford will sit out the 2025 CFl looking towards the NFL. If he's just going to see how things look in the short term, the Bombers should know whether he'll look to the CFL for 2025.

All this will suggest they'd know what his interest in the Bombers and SMS demand will be going forward. At best he likely explores CFL free agency. That may or may not be a significant barrier for his return.

If he hasn't re-signed in Winnipeg by 1 week after free agency opens, I think we will have moved forward. If Ento reaches free agency and we haven't signed Ford, then we should see what his demand will be.

In the meantime we need to lock down Holm so we don't have 2 potential spots in the secondary to deal with going into 2025.  There is a reasonable chance that we may look to replace Alexander as well.



Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 06, 2024, 05:24:01 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 06, 2024, 04:34:10 PMYou keep spinning the idea that the Bombers will have no regard for the SMS. I disagree and think this is just another of your tin hat ideas. Class organizations don't do that.


Walters confirmed they wouldn't change their approach to the budget for a home GC year just last week.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on December 06, 2024, 06:02:32 PM
Walters won't make a conscious attempt to change the $SMS protocol, but if it comes to a point where a player we need means spending more than budgeted, I bet Miller steps in and says "open the wallet".

Of course you cay you're not overspending, that just opes you up for being held up in contract talks. Overbidding won't be the rule, but matching sure will be on the table.  We're not letting a top player walk for $15k this year.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on December 06, 2024, 06:15:02 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on December 06, 2024, 06:02:32 PMWalters won't make a conscious attempt to change the $SMS protocol, but if it comes to a point where a player we need means spending more than budgeted, I bet Miller steps in and says "open the wallet".

Of course you cay you're not overspending, that just opes you up for being held up in contract talks. Overbidding won't be the rule, but matching sure will be on the table.  We're not letting a top player walk for $15k this year.

He did exactly that in 2024 letting Hardrick, Grant, Gray, Bailey, Jeffcoat and Houston depart. In 2023 we let Sayles leave.

The bigger issue with Ford is when he might be available. The wallet only stays open so long before the SMS is spent. It's an advantage that he's Canadian but it's not a critical need for the ratio.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on December 06, 2024, 09:05:10 PM
Whenever he becomes available, I am sure Miller will tell Walters to make it happen...  not at more than his brother, though, unless he changes to QB... lol.

Meanwhile, will be interesting with all the coaching/management changes where QBs end up...
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TecnoGenius on December 07, 2024, 01:48:59 AM
Quote from: theaardvark on December 06, 2024, 09:05:10 PMWhenever he becomes available, I am sure Miller will tell Walters to make it happen...

Ya, WM has shown he will step in when warranted, and he may have different ideas from KW vis a vis the cap.  And they can jawbone about whatever they want, doesn't mean they won't do something else.

When the Lions $300k overage is revealed, people's mindset may change.  And if it's clear BC is overspending again in '25... all bets are off.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TecnoGenius on December 07, 2024, 01:52:00 AM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 06, 2024, 04:39:49 PMIf he hasn't re-signed in Winnipeg by 1 week after free agency opens, I think we will have moved forward. If Ento reaches free agency and we haven't signed Ford, then we should see what his demand will be.

Ento would be nice, but we haven't made splash FA for DB since Heath (FWIR).  DB is one of those units we insist on finding guys, whether cheap rookies we scout or overlooked gems cut by other teams, and dev'ing them.  And it's worked pretty well.

Ento is miles away the best DB and should be paid as such.  CFL precedent hints that he'll get insane money going to a barrel-bottom team.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TecnoGenius on December 07, 2024, 01:55:45 AM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 06, 2024, 03:07:41 PMFrom a Bomber perspective, he has longer to decide on any NFL opportunities since he becomes a complete free agent in February. In that sense, the Bombers may need to move on with other choices including CFL free agency etc etc.

BC set the precedent... So let Ford go chase the NFL again, and when he comes back in week 9 let's make it work by paying him whatever we need to keep him on our team.

I'm assuming Ford has a bit of team loyalty and brotherhood and actually wants to be here.  If he really wants to be elsewhere, then let him walk.

Bonus is he'll only cost a half year of SMS.

Any guy we dress until then can just go back to the PR, unless we strike gold again.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on December 07, 2024, 02:04:10 AM
Quote from: TecnoGenius on December 07, 2024, 01:48:59 AMYa, WM has shown he will step in when warranted, and he may have different ideas from KW vis a vis the cap.  And they can jawbone about whatever they want, doesn't mean they won't do something else.

When the Lions $300k overage is revealed, people's mindset may change.  And if it's clear BC is overspending again in '25... all bets are off.

What people forget is that with bringing in Rourke that put them over the cap significantly, but it was a unique situation in that it meant giving up their first round pick but they knew that they could then turn around and trade Adams after the season and get back a first round pick or close.
So basically its going to cost them in dollars but not in picks. |We wouldn't have that luxury
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Ducky on December 07, 2024, 05:21:05 AM
Quote from: TecnoGenius on December 07, 2024, 01:55:45 AMBC set the precedent... So let Ford go chase the NFL again, and when he comes back in week 9 let's make it work by paying him whatever we need to keep him on our team.

I'm assuming Ford has a bit of team loyalty and brotherhood and actually wants to be here.  If he really wants to be elsewhere, then let him walk.

Bonus is he'll only cost a half year of SMS.

Any guy we dress until then can just go back to the PR, unless we strike gold again.

My guess is he will join his brother in Edmonton (if and when he is released from the NFL).
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: ModAdmin on December 07, 2024, 05:33:05 AM
Tyrell Ford will first, try to make an NFL team and earn recognition and a ton of money.

Second and failing that, he will seek a CFL team that will pay him well (the most)

Third, he will seek a team that has potential to reach a Grey Cup (the ultimate goal and additional playoff money.

Fourth, he will forgo one, two and three and play with his brother in Edmonton.

I'm betting on 1, 2 or 3 options. (I don't see Edmonton breaking the bank to sign him when they have several other needs to be a contender.)
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: BlueFire on December 07, 2024, 11:33:06 AM
Quote from: Ducky on December 07, 2024, 05:21:05 AMMy guess is he will join his brother in Edmonton (if and when he is released from the NFL).

I'd prefer his brother joins him here :)
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on December 07, 2024, 02:59:52 PM
I m in the camp he goes to Edmonton after his NFL tryouts.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on December 07, 2024, 03:16:02 PM
I don't think he's just going to blindly follow his brother.

BUT, if they're rolling with Tre Ford, they do have more dollars to spend than most teams paying 500+ for their QBs.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on December 07, 2024, 05:56:30 PM
Quote from: BlueFire on December 07, 2024, 11:33:06 AMI'd prefer his brother joins him here :)

Was my preference too, except Tre is now signed in Edm now until 2028...
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on December 07, 2024, 09:32:36 PM
Quote from: Jesse on December 07, 2024, 03:16:02 PMI don't think he's just going to blindly follow his brother.

BUT, if they're rolling with Tre Ford, they do have more dollars to spend than most teams paying 500+ for their QBs.
Exactly, I think the lure of extra $$ and the chance to play pro football with your brother on the same team draws him there, and he would be a massive upgrade to their secondary.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TecnoGenius on December 09, 2024, 06:42:27 AM
Quote from: Pete on December 07, 2024, 02:04:10 AMWhat people forget is that with bringing in Rourke that put them over the cap significantly, but it was a unique situation in that it meant giving up their first round pick but they knew that they could then turn around and trade Adams after the season and get back a first round pick or close.

Who here thinks BC would have done the exact same thing even without their "get a DP back free" card (VAJ)?

I do!  And in the end they didn't get their 1RDP back anyhow.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on December 09, 2024, 04:07:00 PM
Quote from: TecnoGenius on December 09, 2024, 06:42:27 AMWho here thinks BC would have done the exact same thing even without their "get a DP back free" card (VAJ)?

I do!  And in the end they didn't get their 1RDP back anyhow.

It just made the thought process a lot easier. And with edm not having a 1rdp, and the loss of theirs they still end up with the 7th pick overall.
  Most teams that could afford it would make the same call.  But if it means not getting a pick til late 2nd rnd it better be for a top player thats a difference maker
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on December 09, 2024, 04:19:46 PM
BC has an advantage when it comes to NAT depth, they only need to field 6, plus their NAT QB.  They have a 15% advantage on the starting ratio right off the hop.  DP's are 15% less valuable to them, really.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: markf on December 09, 2024, 05:06:12 PM
former blue bomber dee alford v. justin  jefferson yesterday


at 1:23

https://youtu.be/kcZD98Xvs5M?si=Wvu_v1mZtDUdqVMr

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on December 09, 2024, 05:47:48 PM
It's a good day to re-sign one of our potential free agents. Who is next?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 10, 2024, 06:07:13 PM
Natl. receiver Jeremy Murphy picked off the PR by the Ti-Cats, like BOLO never got much of a chance to play in his 3 years in Wpg.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: ModAdmin on December 10, 2024, 09:32:33 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 10, 2024, 06:07:13 PMNatl. receiver Jeremy Murphy picked off the PR by the Ti-Cats, like BOLO never got much of a chance to play in his 3 years in Wpg.

All players on the practice roster were released at the end of the season.  So technically, Murphy was a free agent.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on December 11, 2024, 02:24:38 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 10, 2024, 06:07:13 PMNatl. receiver Jeremy Murphy picked off the PR by the Ti-Cats, like BOLO never got much of a chance to play in his 3 years in Wpg.

By Ottawa. And he was drafted in the third round of 2023, meaning he had two seasons here in Winnipeg.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: GOLDMEMBER on December 12, 2024, 06:52:35 PM
I read that Tony Jones re-signed. Loved his play last year.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on December 13, 2024, 01:05:08 PM
I'm surprised there has been less activity than I thought at this point. I was guessing we'd have some 2024 SMS left that we'd be using now. Obviously there is still time before the end of the month.

Note that my thought on SMS was that we had so few players spend time on 1 game IR to accumulate any overspend on that part of the budget. That was outside of what I'd think the normal budget would project.

We'll find out in the new year which teams did go over and how much.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on December 13, 2024, 04:59:13 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 13, 2024, 01:05:08 PMI'm surprised there has been less activity than I thought at this point. I was guessing we'd have some 2024 SMS left that we'd be using now. Obviously there is still time before the end of the month.

Note that my thought on SMS was that we had so few players spend time on 1 game IR to accumulate any overspend on that part of the budget. That was outside of what I'd think the normal budget would project.

We'll find out in the new year which teams did go over and how much.



We've re-signed three players. As well as a few new signings.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 16, 2024, 05:06:36 PM
O'Shea seems to be slow finding his next OC, if it was as easy as promoting somebody from inside I think it would be done by now.  He's getting older and may not be that active in upcoming coaching circles anymore and may have limited outside contacts he can call on.

I think it was only 2 years ago the Riders couldn't find anyone to take their OC job, everyone they approached quickly declined the job opportunity.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on December 16, 2024, 05:16:46 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 16, 2024, 05:06:36 PMO'Shea seems to be slow finding his next OC...

Not exactly under a time constraint right now. And the holidays are right around the corner, so I wouldn't be too shocked if there's no development until the new year.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on December 16, 2024, 06:39:58 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 16, 2024, 05:06:36 PMO'Shea seems to be slow finding his next OC, if it was as easy as promoting somebody from inside I think it would be done by now.  He's getting older and may not be that active in upcoming coaching circles anymore and may have limited outside contacts he can call on.

I think it was only 2 years ago the Riders couldn't find anyone to take their OC job, everyone they approached quickly declined the job opportunity.

Who would want the Riders gig with the clown show that was/is going on there...

Due diligence is the key.There's no rush, not a lot of OC openings right now... so we can take time deciding on the best fit.

Curious how TSN contracts work.  Are they exclusive?  Can guys under contract negotiate with other industries or even take on other jobs?  When do CFL pundits contract end?  Is it a calendar year thing, or a season based deal?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: markf on December 16, 2024, 11:03:46 PM
Cone of silence over Blue Bombers office.

I don't care, that's the way they do things.

We have no idea who they are interviewing for O.C. Not a peep.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 17, 2024, 02:41:46 AM
Ayers along with 10 other CFL players getting tryouts with the Denver Broncos, some surprising names on that list.

The Denver Broncos hosted a CFL-packed workout on Saturday, bringing in receivers Ajou Ajou, Ayden Eberhardt, and Makai Polk, offensive lineman Logan Ferland, defensive linemen Brandon Barlow, Elliott Brown, and Jonah Tavai, and linebackers A.J. Allen, Michael Ayers, Isaac Darkangelo, and Davion Taylor.

https://3downnation.com/2024/12/16/denver-broncos-host-11-cfl-players-for-nfl-work-out/
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on December 17, 2024, 03:11:47 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 17, 2024, 02:41:46 AMAyers along with 10 other CFL players getting tryouts with the Denver Broncos, some surprising names on that list.

The Denver Broncos hosted a CFL-packed workout on Saturday, bringing in receivers Ajou Ajou, Ayden Eberhardt, and Makai Polk, offensive lineman Logan Ferland, defensive linemen Brandon Barlow, Elliott Brown, and Jonah Tavai, and linebackers A.J. Allen, Michael Ayers, Isaac Darkangelo, and Davion Taylor.

https://3downnation.com/2024/12/16/denver-broncos-host-11-cfl-players-for-nfl-work-out/

Good luck to Ayers but I hope he ends up in Winnipeg in 2025. He showed some promise. Whether that's enough to get him a shot in the NFL I don't know. Can't deny the young man for wanting to make an NFL team and that big money.

There have been reports of about 15 or so CFL players getting tryouts with NFL teams so far. We usually see a few that actually get TC invites but it's a very small number that have longevity beyond TC.

T. Ford had his 2nd tryout that I've heard about to date. To some degree I have fading hopes of seeing him return to Winnipeg in 2025. Whether that is due to a longer NFL look or CFL offers besides Winnipeg IDK.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: markf on December 18, 2024, 10:17:04 PM
I have a theory that USFL and other lower league players have a better chance of signing with the NFL cause the coaches, and management, and players representatives have ties, and dealings, that do not exist between CFL staff and NFL

So.... "In just two seasons, the USFL has shown it can help players get to the NFL. The USFL has seen more than 320 players land workouts with NFL teams, with more than 100 NFL contracts signed."

Could be wrong though.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on December 18, 2024, 10:40:55 PM
Quote from: markf on December 18, 2024, 10:17:04 PMI have a theory that USFL and other lower league players have a better chance of signing with the NFL cause the coaches, and management, and players representatives have ties, and dealings, that do not exist between CFL staff and NFL

So.... "In just two seasons, the USFL has shown it can help players get to the NFL. The USFL has seen more than 320 players land workouts with NFL teams, with more than 100 NFL contracts signed."

Could be wrong though.


Makes sense. I had no idea so many USFL tryouts result in contracts--1:3 ratio roughly. I thought the USFL would be a feeder league to the CFL not the NFL. Do you know if most of the USFL player contracts PR contracts or actual roster spots earned via these tryouts??
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: markf on December 18, 2024, 11:42:08 PM
Quote from: dd on December 18, 2024, 10:40:55 PMMakes sense. I had no idea so many USFL tryouts result in contracts--1:3 ratio roughly. I thought the USFL would be a feeder league to the CFL not the NFL. Do you know if most of the USFL player contracts PR contracts or actual roster spots earned via these tryouts??

Not sure, this is the article... https://www.foxsports.com/stories/usfl/14-usfl-players-end-up-on-nfl-active-rosters-practice-squads-or-injured-reserve

Not an answer to your question, but...... I do know that from that list, Brandon Aubrey...field goal  kicker,  is really good, starter for Dallas this season


Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on December 19, 2024, 12:39:05 AM
Quote from: markf on December 18, 2024, 11:42:08 PMNot sure, this is the article... https://www.foxsports.com/stories/usfl/14-usfl-players-end-up-on-nfl-active-rosters-practice-squads-or-injured-reserve

Not an answer to your question, but...... I do know that from that list, Brandon Aubrey...field goal  kicker,  is really good, starter for Dallas this season




USFL is more visible to the NFL. They are always going to add some players that will be TCF to fill out their roster early. Obviously a few will get longer looks and may already have some NFL experience. It's just a numbers game.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on December 19, 2024, 07:24:13 PM
Proximity and familiarity do make USFL players more likely to get a glance from an NFL team, and that can be all it takes for a late bloomer to get a shot.

CFL players need to stand out to get noticed, but some teams seem to have their eyes trained north of the border to catch some untapped talent.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: ichabod_crane on December 19, 2024, 09:46:48 PM
Quote from: markf on December 16, 2024, 11:03:46 PMCone of silence over Blue Bombers office.

I don't care, that's the way they do things.

We have no idea who they are interviewing for O.C. Not a peep.



Ah Yes, the cone of silence!! :D Wonder if they got the prop from the Get Smart set from the 1960's! ;)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxmEtJ31Ldw

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on December 19, 2024, 10:30:37 PM
Quote from: markf on December 18, 2024, 10:17:04 PMI have a theory that USFL and other lower league players have a better chance of signing with the NFL cause the coaches, and management, and players representatives have ties, and dealings, that do not exist between CFL staff and NFL

So.... "In just two seasons, the USFL has shown it can help players get to the NFL. The USFL has seen more than 320 players land workouts with NFL teams, with more than 100 NFL contracts signed."

Could be wrong though.



i think its younger prospects that first turn to usfl etc. in order to get that nfl look. once they hit 26 or older then the cfl becomes a more viable option.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Stats Junkie on December 20, 2024, 05:27:38 AM
Quote from: markf on December 18, 2024, 10:17:04 PMI have a theory that USFL and other lower league players have a better chance of signing with the NFL cause the coaches, and management, and players representatives have ties, and dealings, that do not exist between CFL staff and NFL

So.... "In just two seasons, the USFL has shown it can help players get to the NFL. The USFL has seen more than 320 players land workouts with NFL teams, with more than 100 NFL contracts signed."

Could be wrong though.
I believe that the nature of the spring leagues (UFL,USFL,XFL or whatever they are called now) allows for an easier transition to the NFL. Those leagues were designed as auditions for the NFL and come with the opportunity to transfer to the NFL (not CFL).

The spring leagues conclude prior to NFL training camp which allows those players to immediately compete for jobs for a full training camp - yes, NFL politics still gets in the way.

The CFL season overlaps with the NFL season for several months, especially if you include NFL training camps. Any player on a CFL roster at the end of the season can attend tryouts (with permission from his CFL team) but he cannot play in the NFL during the current season.

Many CFL players only get a 1 or 2 day tryout on the side and decisions have to made on that. When CFL players sign futures contracts with NFL teams, the players have to weigh the costs of missing half a season or more of CFL action if the NFL opportunity fails.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on December 20, 2024, 03:25:59 PM
Quote from: Stats Junkie on December 20, 2024, 05:27:38 AMI believe that the nature of the spring leagues (UFL,USFL,XFL or whatever they are called now) allows for an easier transition to the NFL. Those leagues were designed as auditions for the NFL and come with the opportunity to transfer to the NFL (not CFL).

The spring leagues conclude prior to NFL training camp which allows those players to immediately compete for jobs for a full training camp - yes, NFL politics still gets in the way.

The CFL season overlaps with the NFL season for several months, especially if you include NFL training camps. Any player on a CFL roster at the end of the season can attend tryouts (with permission from his CFL team) but he cannot play in the NFL during the current season.

Many CFL players only get a 1 or 2 day tryout on the side and decisions have to made on that. When CFL players sign futures contracts with NFL teams, the players have to weigh the costs of missing half a season or more of CFL action if the NFL opportunity fails.

If they sign a futures contract, they should get some guaranteed money in the deal, and that can be more than what they'd make in the time missed in the CFL.. makes the decision easier.  Its the TC invites that can be a debate over potential versus real CFL money...  but every football player will take the NFL dream over an ELC contract in the CFL, unless money is a very, very important factor in their lives at that moment.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on December 20, 2024, 04:47:11 PM
Plus when they wash out in the nfl some desperate cfl team will pay them most of the lost salary even if its for a shortened season
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on December 20, 2024, 11:50:39 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on December 20, 2024, 03:25:59 PMIf they sign a futures contract, they should get some guaranteed money in the deal, and that can be more than what they'd make in the time missed in the CFL.. makes the decision easier.  Its the TC invites that can be a debate over potential versus real CFL money...  but every football player will take the NFL dream over an ELC contract in the CFL, unless money is a very, very important factor in their lives at that moment.

The CFL signs future contracts as well. It just means they are being invited to TC with no guarantees.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 21, 2024, 01:16:12 AM
Quote from: Pete on December 19, 2024, 10:30:37 PMi think its younger prospects that first turn to usfl etc. in order to get that nfl look. once they hit 26 or older then the cfl becomes a more viable option.

Makes a big difference if the player is single or married and has kids or not, once married  the family life pressures them to make more practical decisions. If Nathan Rourke was still single there's a reasonable chance he wouldn't have come back to the CFL so soon.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on December 21, 2024, 03:21:03 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 20, 2024, 11:50:39 PMThe CFL signs future contracts as well. It just means they are being invited to TC with no guarantees.

And here's a big thing that I think people are missing.

The USFL can claim that all these players have signed "contracts" in the NFL for their propaganda pieces, but how many of those are futures deals that may or may not mean the player ever steps foot on an NFL field?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on December 24, 2024, 01:08:38 PM
Not free agents but Ford, Ayers and O. Wilson have all had tryouts with NFL teams recently. Those are not players we want to lose obviously.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 24, 2024, 04:49:37 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 24, 2024, 01:08:38 PMNot free agents but Ford, Ayers and O. Wilson have all had tryouts with NFL teams recently. Those are not players we want to lose obviously.

Ford is a FA, who did Wilson try out with?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on December 24, 2024, 05:14:50 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 24, 2024, 04:49:37 PMFord is a FA, who did Wilson try out with?

Wilson and Ayers had a work out with Jets. Since the Jets are such a bad team, the odds of getting a TC offer increases IMO. If that happens, they may miss half the CFL season. Same for Ford but I think his odds are longer to not get an offer or stick since he had that look see in 2023. IMO he's not a NFL CB type and teams will draft younger players to put on their PR's.

I've never been in favour of the NFL option window or 1 year deals for vets. It's counter productive to building continuity. Every off season teams seem to have 25 - 30 potential free agents. Bombers had 28 IIRC then we also risk losing 2 rookies as well?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on December 24, 2024, 05:51:03 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 24, 2024, 05:14:50 PMWilson and Ayers had a work out with Jets. Since the Jets are such a bad team, the odds of getting a TC offer increases IMO. If that happens, they may miss half the CFL season. Same for Ford but I think his odds are longer to not get an offer or stick since he had that look see in 2023. IMO he's not a NFL CB type and teams will draft younger players to put on their PR's.

I've never been in favour of the NFL option window or 1 year deals for vets. It's counter productive to building continuity. Every off season teams seem to have 25 - 30 potential free agents. Bombers had 28 IIRC then we also risk losing 2 rookies as well?

You are correct, the window causes issues with players leaving.

BUT, without the window, those player may never come to the CFL.

The CFL's one year deals and NFL window make it MORE attractive to players that still have NFL dreams.  The get to come here, showcase thier talents, turn that into these tryouts, and potentially get the NFL deal they dream of. 

Sure, we lose the Alfords, or have the Rourke, Mack or Betts short term defections, but there is also the chance that none of them come here without those "outs" until they are convinced they have no NFL opportunities left. 

I think the one year deals and window are necessary evils and a great compromise for recruiting, and might actually help bring young talent here sooner, especially when players like Alford or Singleton end up sticking south of the border after CFL showcases.

I really hope our players return for TC, but I am excited for them to make their NFL dreams come true. It just means we need to recruit a little harder, but again, for a recruiter, a successful NFL stint for a player you recruited to the CFL is a GREAT sales tool for our league, and even bigger one for your team. 
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on December 24, 2024, 06:05:20 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on December 24, 2024, 05:51:03 PMYou are correct, the window causes issues with players leaving.

BUT, without the window, those player may never come to the CFL.

The CFL's one year deals and NFL window make it MORE attractive to players that still have NFL dreams.  The get to come here, showcase thier talents, turn that into these tryouts, and potentially get the NFL deal they dream of. 

Sure, we lose the Alfords, or have the Rourke, Mack or Betts short term defections, but there is also the chance that none of them come here without those "outs" until they are convinced they have no NFL opportunities left. 

I think the one year deals and window are necessary evils and a great compromise for recruiting, and might actually help bring young talent here sooner, especially when players like Alford or Singleton end up sticking south of the border after CFL showcases.

I really hope our players return for TC, but I am excited for them to make their NFL dreams come true. It just means we need to recruit a little harder, but again, for a recruiter, a successful NFL stint for a player you recruited to the CFL is a GREAT sales tool for our league, and even bigger one for your team. 

I'm ok with those players never coming to the CFL. The thought is over rated for a dozen players each off season that get an NFL look only to be cut after TC.

Losing Canadian players is even a worse thing when we are " forced " by the ratio to draft / protect them.

We lost Alford but Ford essentially wasted his 2023 season. Financially he probably did alright but football player careers are short. As I've said, I doubt he is successful in his 2nd effort but may change teams in the CFL this year.

The 1 year deals are for vets and doesn't really help anyone with NFL dreams. It just fuels transitional rosters in the CFL.

Who on the Bombers roster coming off a 1 year deal has any hope of serious NFL tryouts? Better yet, who was the last player that would have come off his 1st ELC then a 1 year deal, gone to the NFL? Those players move but they move to other CFL teams. The 1 year deal has nothing to do with the NFL opportunity.

So far there have been about 12 players getting early NFL looks but how many actually will get NFL offers for TC and make NFL rosters.

I think Ford was the only Bomber to get a look in 2023 and get any opportunity at all.

There always 100's on American players that will be willing to come to Canada even without the NFL option window. It was never an issue or need in the past to find players.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on December 24, 2024, 06:22:02 PM
The CFL has officially reintroduced the NFL window with a new set of guidelines for how players from the Canadian league can go about signing contracts south of the border.

The league first created the NFL window in 1997 and it remained in place until 2012. The CFL has tried to bring it back in recent years and it's now returned after clearing the necessary hurdles with the NFL.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on December 24, 2024, 08:49:53 PM
Many players play one year then head south.  Some, it takes a couple years, then they get a look.  Regardless, having them for any period makes the league better, and any success they have in the NFL legitimizes the CFL as a place to build a brand.

Yes, it would be nice to tie up players longer term and not give the best of the best an option out.  But we've seen what happens when that comes into play.  Players demanding renegotiation after a great season has happened when not given an out to the NFL. 

The league has implemented policies to improve retention of players, both in the league and on a team.  Guaranteed money has never been available before for multi year deals, now its there and it is used.

I'd like to see retention of rights for players using NFL windows, making contracts that were in place enforceable upon return.  Or at least giving teams the right to match any CFL offer for a returning player.  Expecting a player coming off a few years in the NFL to come back and finish out his ELC is kind of pie in the sky, but giving a team the right to match is reasonable.  Like the FA tampering period.

The league has to operate in a market that includes the spring leagues and the NFL.  It will never be perfect, but it is getting better integrated every CBA...
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on December 24, 2024, 09:54:22 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on December 24, 2024, 08:49:53 PMMany players play one year then head south.  Some, it takes a couple years, then they get a look.  Regardless, having them for any period makes the league better, and any success they have in the NFL legitimizes the CFL as a place to build a brand.

Yes, it would be nice to tie up players longer term and not give the best of the best an option out.  But we've seen what happens when that comes into play.  Players demanding renegotiation after a great season has happened when not given an out to the NFL. 

The league has implemented policies to improve retention of players, both in the league and on a team.  Guaranteed money has never been available before for multi year deals, now its there and it is used.

I'd like to see retention of rights for players using NFL windows, making contracts that were in place enforceable upon return.  Or at least giving teams the right to match any CFL offer for a returning player.  Expecting a player coming off a few years in the NFL to come back and finish out his ELC is kind of pie in the sky, but giving a team the right to match is reasonable.  Like the FA tampering period.

The league has to operate in a market that includes the spring leagues and the NFL.  It will never be perfect, but it is getting better integrated every CBA...

That's just not true. How many 1st year players were lost to the NFL in 2023? Many is an exaggeration. Even those that have completed their 2nd year is still a very small list.

Each off season we see about 80 players change teams within the CFL. Those are players that have completed their ELC's and / or beyond. We see about 6 lost to the NFL due to NFL option window.

There were nearly 280 potential CFL free agents in the list. Many were those that completed 1 year deals.

How is that anything close to retention?

I'd agree that CFL teams should retain rights for those leave due to NFL option beyond the initial ELC. The reality is that those that leave are usually back before the end of their ELC. The others that last longer seldom return so it's a moot point.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: ModAdmin on December 27, 2024, 04:40:19 AM
(https://scontent.fcxh2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/471414616_1313837013399890_7902010821188035102_n.jpg?stp=dst-jpg_p526x296_tt6&_nc_cat=105&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=aa7b47&_nc_ohc=uYpaBeYunFsQ7kNvgENYcqi&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent.fcxh2-1.fna&_nc_gid=ALT5waYNU7PMw7omKpoKe58&oh=00_AYDyFZnM4RUMgl9xE-crReLNwKEe__O_A81z1WRwhpgZ7Q&oe=6773F9B5)
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on December 27, 2024, 04:57:41 AM
Wow, I thought he had a decent season but not that decent
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: ModAdmin on December 27, 2024, 06:39:03 AM
I hear what you are saying, but over 1,000 yards in a CFL season is going to get you some attention.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 27, 2024, 04:38:43 PM
Quote from: ModAdmin on December 27, 2024, 04:40:19 AM(https://scontent.fcxh2-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/471414616_1313837013399890_7902010821188035102_n.jpg?stp=dst-jpg_p526x296_tt6&_nc_cat=105&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=aa7b47&_nc_ohc=uYpaBeYunFsQ7kNvgENYcqi&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent.fcxh2-1.fna&_nc_gid=ALT5waYNU7PMw7omKpoKe58&oh=00_AYDyFZnM4RUMgl9xE-crReLNwKEe__O_A81z1WRwhpgZ7Q&oe=6773F9B5)

I don't know how NFL teams categorize players but I checked out the NY Jets website, no mention of Wilson or Ayers on their PR list or anywhere else.  I guess they have sub-PR lists they don't even bother to account for.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on December 27, 2024, 04:48:06 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 27, 2024, 04:38:43 PMI don't know how NFL teams categorize players but I checked out the NY Jets website, no mention of Wilson or Ayers on their PR list or anywhere else.  I guess they have sub-PR lists they don't even bother to account for.

They are just there for a workout and look see. At this point they have not been made offers. It requires for the player to be released by the Bombers if an offer is to be made / accepted.

CFL players might get multiple early work outs. Whether anything comes from that we'll see.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: markf on December 27, 2024, 05:54:50 PM
Top down, New York Jets are chaotic, website not being updated properly would not be surprising.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on December 28, 2024, 03:33:07 AM
Quote from: ModAdmin on December 27, 2024, 06:39:03 AMI hear what you are saying, but over 1,000 yards in a CFL season is going to get you some attention.
For sure, but he struck me as a solid #3 reciever on our team, and that gets an NFL tryout?? I guess, good for him.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on December 30, 2024, 01:32:54 PM
Quote from: ModAdmin on December 27, 2024, 06:39:03 AMI hear what you are saying, but over 1,000 yards in a CFL season as a rookie is going to get you some attention.

FTFY

Wilson's earned a look, IMO.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on December 30, 2024, 01:49:18 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on December 30, 2024, 01:32:54 PMFTFY

Wilson's earned a look, IMO.

We'll wish him well but often the NFL just signs players for TCF. If he has a legit chance to make at least their PR then it's a fair decision. I'd hate to lose him but that's the nature of the business aspect.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 30, 2024, 03:49:36 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 30, 2024, 01:49:18 PMWe'll wish him well but often the NFL just signs players for TCF. If he has a legit chance to make at least their PR then it's a fair decision. I'd hate to lose him but that's the nature of the business aspect.

Yah, this past season we saw the pain of integrating rookie receivers into the starting lineup, it throttles the offence big time, one a year should be the goal, not 3 at once. Should be past the growing pains now but injuries are inevitable so I'd lean towards picking up unsigned vet. receivers off the scrap heap on a temp. basis in the future just to cover the gaps.  There's always a handful of them available ready to go and most will sign at a low pay rate just for the opportunity to get back on the field, which may have been the case with Lucky.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on December 30, 2024, 07:46:37 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on December 30, 2024, 03:49:36 PMYah, this past season we saw the pain of integrating rookie receivers into the starting lineup, it throttles the offence big time, one a year should be the goal, not 3 at once. Should be past the growing pains now but injuries are inevitable so I'd lean towards picking up unsigned vet. receivers off the scrap heap on a temp. basis in the future just to cover the gaps.  There's always a handful of them available ready to go and most will sign at a low pay rate just for the opportunity to get back on the field, which may have been the case with Lucky.

If we think we''re going to lose him for at least half the season, it impacts the need to re-sign our other receivers.

I think we should be doing that regardless, but SMS may be an issue for all of them. Lawler, Schoen and Woli are not all certain to return.

The extent and availability to Schoen and Woli due to injuries may still be a moving target as well.

We may re-signed some players but haven't made announcements yet. And / or it was determined there was little 2024 SMS available to use before the end of the year.

All that said, I expected some SMS available so this is all a surprise so little has been announced. Not every player is going to get signing bonus money that is paid in 2024 so re-signings could have been made a month ago.

What's the hold up? Bombers always seem late to the party on all this stuff.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on December 31, 2024, 06:40:18 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on December 30, 2024, 07:46:37 PMIf we think we''re going to lose him for at least half the season, it impacts the need to re-sign our other receivers.

I think we should be doing that regardless, but SMS may be an issue for all of them. Lawler, Schoen and Woli are not all certain to return.

The extent and availability to Schoen and Woli due to injuries may still be a moving target as well.

We may re-signed some players but haven't made announcements yet. And / or it was determined there was little 2024 SMS available to use before the end of the year.

All that said, I expected some SMS available so this is all a surprise so little has been announced. Not every player is going to get signing bonus money that is paid in 2024 so re-signings could have been made a month ago.

What's the hold up? Bombers always seem late to the party on all this stuff.
yeah you would have thought with Schoen and Lawton missing the entire year that we would have had some sms money left.
Hopefully this year we have determined that simply paying more to keep the team at close to being intact isn't working when it comes to winning the big prize. We have to improve our roster to stand a chance against Toronto/Montreal. Both were significantly better ly. (as a side not Mtrl is light years ahead of most teams in terms of putting together their roster for 2025 with all key pieces signed including Beverette, Uguak, Philpot, Mack, Rambo, Anderson and now Fletcher all re-signed for at least 2 years.)
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on January 03, 2025, 10:03:56 PM
In the past 3 weeks we've signed one import lb, and lost 2 coaches.
The silence continues
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on January 03, 2025, 11:32:42 PM
Quote from: Pete on January 03, 2025, 10:03:56 PMIn the past 3 weeks we've signed one import lb, and lost 2 coaches.
The silence continues
I hear what you're saying, but I have no doubt Walters has deals already done with our returning players and is just playing his cards tight to his chest and not announcing anything yet as that would tip off other teams what our 'needs' are in FA.

He knows full well that we are hosting the GC this year and the pressure will huge to make it to the big game and win it

At least, that's what I m telling myself while I wait for announcements....

I'd really like to know who our OC is going to be next season, as he should be in place before we start acquiring personnel
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on January 04, 2025, 12:19:31 AM
Quote from: Pete on January 03, 2025, 10:03:56 PMIn the past 3 weeks we've signed one import lb, and lost 2 coaches.
The silence continues

A few things:

We've never had trouble retaining talent under Walters and O'Shea.

A bunch of contracts are probably signed for announcement in 2025 - not to mention we have signing bonus money again now.

It's not like there are thhhhatt many signings going on around the league in December. There never really is for a bunch of reasons (NFL workouts, sms, holidays, etc.).

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on January 04, 2025, 01:37:01 AM
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on January 04, 2025, 12:19:31 AMA few things:

We've never had trouble retaining talent under Walters and O'Shea.

A bunch of contracts are probably signed for announcement in 2025 - not to mention we have signing bonus money again now.

It's not like there are thhhhatt many signings going on around the league in December. There never really is for a bunch of reasons (NFL workouts, sms, holidays, etc.).


since dec 11 every other team has signed 5-9 free agents, we've signed one. I think we're the only team that hasn't finalized their main coaching staff.
Bonuses can be negotiated any time i.e. for feb 1 etc.
  (mtrl-9, toronto-7, hamilton-7, ottawa-5, bc-10, edm -7, calgary-9, sask=9, wpg-1)
Must be our gm is on holidays
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 04, 2025, 04:42:33 PM
Quote from: Pete on January 04, 2025, 01:37:01 AMsince dec 11 every other team has signed 5-9 free agents, we've signed one. I think we're the only team that hasn't finalized their main coaching staff.
Bonuses can be negotiated any time i.e. for feb 1 etc.
  (mtrl-9, toronto-7, hamilton-7, ottawa-5, bc-10, edm -7, calgary-9, sask=9, wpg-1)
Must be our gm is on holidays

Photo taken at the Bombers head office just last week, the boys are getting ready to kick it into high gear.

(https://media.sciencephoto.com/image/m3720327/800wm)
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on January 04, 2025, 05:34:56 PM
Quote from: Pete on January 04, 2025, 01:37:01 AMsince dec 11 every other team has signed 5-9 free agents, we've signed one. I think we're the only team that hasn't finalized their main coaching staff.
Bonuses can be negotiated any time i.e. for feb 1 etc.
  (mtrl-9, toronto-7, hamilton-7, ottawa-5, bc-10, edm -7, calgary-9, sask=9, wpg-1)
Must be our gm is on holidays

You gotta sign the big names before you know how much room you to retain middle of the road guys.

I think we're waiting to see if Ford is getting an NFL deal or negotiating with him right now.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 04, 2025, 05:47:43 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 04, 2025, 05:34:56 PMYou gotta sign the big names before you know how much room you to retain middle of the road guys.

I think we're waiting to see if Ford is getting an NFL deal or negotiating with him right now.

That's only partially true regarding Ford.

We have several big names to sign: Lawler, Schoen, Dobson, Neufeld and Holm are going to be high value decisions. Several could cost us more than Ford.  Others like : Lofton, Bighill, Alexander, Jefferson, Cole and Wilson may not be as expensive as the 1st group and it's unknown whether we plan to bring them back.

The last group of: Fox, Haba, Thomas, Garbutt and Streveler may not be returning although cost is not the primary issue.

As far as Ford, I've mentioned I don't expect him back whether he gets an NFL offer or not. He's not a long term Bomber ( committed ) and I think he goes where the money is and that could quite likely be in excess to what the Bombers are willing to pay.

This is not to say I would be unhappy to see him re-signed on Monday. Of all pour potential free agents, Ford and Holm are the players we stand the greatest chance of losing IMO.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 04, 2025, 05:54:08 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 04, 2025, 05:34:56 PMYou gotta sign the big names before you know how much room you to retain middle of the road guys.

I think we're waiting to see if Ford is getting an NFL deal or negotiating with him right now.

Ford will be a late add, if at all.  He will be a guy that we will make cap space for if he comes available, but I can't see holding his full expected ask out of the budget waiting for him.  No doubt Walters has made him a very competitive offer, with an expiry date before FA starts, but after the tampering window opens. And we are the only club that can include guaranteed money in a multi year deal.

If Ford entertains offers in the CFL, I think we could lose to an insane offer from Hervey to unite the bros.  Tre got a 3 year deal, no doubt max'ing the guaranteed money in the back 2.  Ty can be offered the same money, but no guarantees.  Hervey is just crazy enough to do that, and ownership might see the marketing value in that.  They are dying at the gate.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 04, 2025, 06:00:23 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 04, 2025, 05:47:43 PMThat's only partially true regarding Ford.

We have several big names to sign: Lawler, Schoen, Dobson, Neufeld and Holm are going to be high value decisions. Several could cost us more than Ford.  Others like : Lofton, Bighill, Alexander, Jefferson, Cole and Wilson may not be as expensive as the 1st group and it's unknown whether we plan to bring them back.

The last group of: Fox, Haba, Thomas, Garbutt and Streveler may not be returning although cost is not the primary issue.

As far as Ford, I've mentioned I don't expect him back whether he gets an NFL offer or not. He's not a long term Bomber ( committed ) and I think he goes where the money is and that could quite likely be in excess to what the Bombers are willing to pay.

This is not to say I would be unhappy to see him re-signed on Monday. Of all pour potential free agents, Ford and Holm are the players we stand the greatest chance of losing IMO.



I can't see any of the players you mention in the first group getting big raises other than Holm.  In fact, we might actually sign that group for a total outlay similar to 2024, with some reductions balancing Holm's increase. 

The second group, I can see testing the tampering market, but I can't see any getting substantially better offers, or being irreplaceable at their current outlay.

The last group will not be hard to re-sign if the team wants them, without risk, for TC.  Maybe having roster bonuses for making the team to start the season.

Not saying Walters has a walk in the park, but while we have a lot of FA's to sign, there are going to be a lot available, and our D coaches are going to be a selling point, hopefully our OC will be as well.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 04, 2025, 08:14:13 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 04, 2025, 06:00:23 PMI can't see any of the players you mention in the first group getting big raises other than Holm.  In fact, we might actually sign that group for a total outlay similar to 2024, with some reductions balancing Holm's increase. 

The second group, I can see testing the tampering market, but I can't see any getting substantially better offers, or being irreplaceable at their current outlay.

The last group will not be hard to re-sign if the team wants them, without risk, for TC.  Maybe having roster bonuses for making the team to start the season.

Not saying Walters has a walk in the park, but while we have a lot of FA's to sign, there are going to be a lot available, and our D coaches are going to be a selling point, hopefully our OC will be as well.

I wasn't suggesting the players in the 1st group would be getting increases. Holm yes, Dobson probably as well. We'll probably see some reductions or re-structuring for the others as you suggested.

The point was that SMS money starts getting spent as that group re-signs.  Players have less leverage after their team gets a large number of their potential free agents re-signed.

IMO the team has a very good idea of whether Ford might be returning to the CFL and if so where the team stands with their offer.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on January 04, 2025, 09:11:46 PM
Quote from: Pete on January 04, 2025, 01:37:01 AMsince dec 11 every other team has signed 5-9 free agents, we've signed one. I think we're the only team that hasn't finalized their main coaching staff.
Bonuses can be negotiated any time i.e. for feb 1 etc.
  (mtrl-9, toronto-7, hamilton-7, ottawa-5, bc-10, edm -7, calgary-9, sask=9, wpg-1)
Must be our gm is on holidays

It's really hard to criticize a management group that's been at the top of the league for five straight years though, isn't it?

You don't win awards for announcing your signings earlier than other teams. 

December is always a quiet month in the CFL and you've got a lot of guys getting NFL workouts.

And you are assuming a negative for no real reason. The Bombers likely are very confident they'll be able to retain everyone they want to that doesn't go south. I see it as a strength and an advantage.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 04, 2025, 09:40:01 PM
Every position group will have a number of free agents, and a number of player already signed by their prospective teams.  Depending on the number of available positions, and available players, leverage goes up or down.

More than anything else, scarcity affects value.  Supply/demand.  If a player sees that there are a number of comparables coming available, and that number is greater than the number of spots open, he may be content to stick where he is at a decent price.

If there is only a few players coming on the market, and a large number of teams needing that spot filled, then of course, that is what the FA frenzy is all about.  And those players will be courted. 

Adding in passports also can affect the market.

Walters will have these "facts" available to him, and can put a very compelling pitch together for any players he has "leverage" on.  Those will be the players we see signed before the tampering window.  The ones that don't want to face competition.

And then we get to have the fun of plugging holes, either with a FA, or with a recruit.  And that's where Walters earns his pay.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on January 04, 2025, 09:58:22 PM
right now I'm not drinking the blue koolaid. (probably cause its boring right now with it being so quiet) As players approach free agency they in the past have seemed to get more expensive.  As for free agency recent history has shown that we are not a big player. I would like us to be more active strategically. I do feel that the grey cup results for the past 3 years have left players less enthusiastic about resigning.
 I am also surprised we haven't got an offensive coordinator in place. Walters has said that its hard to make moves without your coach in place.

 




Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 04, 2025, 11:21:40 PM
Quote from: Pete on January 04, 2025, 09:58:22 PMright now I'm not drinking the blue koolaid. (probably cause its boring right now with it being so quiet) As players approach free agency they in the past have seemed to get more expensive.  As for free agency recent history has shown that we are not a big player. I would like us to be more active strategically. I do feel that the grey cup results for the past 3 years have left players less enthusiastic about resigning.
I am also surprised we haven't got an offensive coordinator in place. Walters has said that its hard to make moves without your coach in place.

Picking the coaching staff is O'Shea's job, so hard to say what's going to come out of this, is he well connected at all? Walters job is figuring out how to pay them. 

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on January 05, 2025, 02:18:36 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 04, 2025, 11:21:40 PMPicking the coaching staff is O'Shea's job, so hard to say what's going to come out of this, is he well connected at all? Walters job is figuring out how to pay them. 


what walters was referring to is you'd want your offensive coach to be on board with how much you spend on certain positions and who. Ie do we want to spend less on receivers and more on oline? Do we want to sign both Lawler and Schoen and save elsewhere ? Should we re-sign Streveler or look at other options?
Whether its Oshea or Walters it would be good to have the OC in place
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: M.O.A.B. on January 05, 2025, 02:31:16 AM
Walters and Co. getting late to the party (again).
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 05, 2025, 04:14:47 PM
I mistakenly thought Woli was a pending free agent but he's under contract for 2025. Sorry if I confused anyone about that earlier.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on January 05, 2025, 04:19:27 PM
Quote from: M.O.A.B. on January 05, 2025, 02:31:16 AMWalters and Co. getting late to the party (again).

Patty signed today.

Calendar has turned over. People are back in the office. Contracts can get signed now.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on January 05, 2025, 04:46:24 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 05, 2025, 04:19:27 PMPatty signed today.

Calendar has turned over. People are back in the office. Contracts can get signed now.

Good start to the New Year.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 05, 2025, 05:56:09 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 05, 2025, 04:19:27 PMPatty signed today.

Calendar has turned over. People are back in the office. Contracts can get signed now.

We'll see, but I suspect Walters has made a bundle of signings already and just wants to parcel the announcements out slowly one at a time to build up interest in the upcoming season.  He's probably figured out by now announcements made in mid-late Dec. just get lost in the year end holiday season and have less impact. 
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on January 06, 2025, 01:05:28 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 05, 2025, 05:56:09 PMWe'll see, but I suspect Walters has made a bundle of signings already and just wants to parcel the announcements out slowly one at a time to build up interest in the upcoming season.  He's probably figured out by now announcements made in mid-late Dec. just get lost in the year end holiday season and have less impact. 

Makes zero difference.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TecnoGenius on January 06, 2025, 07:03:26 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 05, 2025, 05:56:09 PMWe'll see, but I suspect Walters has made a bundle of signings already and just wants to parcel the announcements out slowly one at a time to build up interest in the upcoming season.

That may work in theory from KW's end, but how do you keep the players from spilling the beans on Twatter in this day and age?  I'm not sold on this theory.

That said, I'm not worried at all.  KW has the richest bank account to work with (well, maybe shy of Doman's "cheating" ways) and we get good overall "marks" and are a good destination that is perennially GC-bound... I think we'll have no trouble stocking the player shelves.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 06, 2025, 03:47:18 PM
Quote from: TecnoGenius on January 06, 2025, 07:03:26 AMThat may work in theory from KW's end, but how do you keep the players from spilling the beans on Twatter in this day and age?  I'm not sold on this theory.

That said, I'm not worried at all.  KW has the richest bank account to work with (well, maybe shy of Doman's "cheating" ways) and we get good overall "marks" and are a good destination that is perennially GC-bound... I think we'll have no trouble stocking the player shelves.


You can't keep a player's twitter silent if he wants to crow about it, but I can't ever see a player sign a deal, get asked not to announce it until the team does, and then go ahead and announce it. 

Maybe an accidental hint "Hey, anyone got a line on a nice apartment in Winnipeg for the season?" but until the team files with the league, I'm sure the player will gladly keep it hush hush.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 06, 2025, 04:39:50 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 06, 2025, 01:05:28 AMMakes zero difference.

Maybe, but the 3 people in charge have been in place for a decade now and tend to do things in a methodical way based on what's worked best for them in the past, instead of haphazardly treating each new season as if it's a new experience. You have to give them full credit for the experience they've gained and the organization they've built which makes it difficult to believe they're not following a well established game-plan.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on January 06, 2025, 06:50:42 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 06, 2025, 04:39:50 PMMaybe, but the 3 people in charge have been in place for a decade now and tend to do things in a methodical way based on what worked best for them in the past, instead of haphazardly treating each new season as if it's a new experience. You have to give them full credit for the experience they've gained and the organization they've built which makes it difficult to suggest they follow no set game-plan.

Not sure what you're reading into, but I never said any of that, lol.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on January 06, 2025, 11:43:20 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 06, 2025, 04:39:50 PMMaybe, but the 3 people in charge have been in place for a decade now and tend to do things in a methodical way based on what's worked best for them in the past, instead of haphazardly treating each new season as if it's a new experience. You have to give them full credit for the experience they've gained and the organization they've built which makes it difficult to believe they're not following a well established game-plan.

Hey its part of our dna to question what the heck mgmt is doing, otherwise what would we have to post about? If we hadn't lost the last 3 grey cups maybe we would .be on the bandwagon and things would get boring quickly
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TecnoGenius on January 07, 2025, 03:12:05 AM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 06, 2025, 03:47:18 PMMaybe an accidental hint "Hey, anyone got a line on a nice apartment in Winnipeg for the season?"

That's precisely what I'm talking about.  So many times over the years we get these not-so-coy bean-spillings.  Those are basically the same thing as KW doing a press release.

And yet we haven't heard a single peep...
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 07, 2025, 03:49:19 AM
Quote from: TecnoGenius on January 07, 2025, 03:12:05 AMThat's precisely what I'm talking about.  So many times over the years we get these not-so-coy bean-spillings.  Those are basically the same thing as KW doing a press release.

And yet we haven't heard a single peep...


Maybe the memo's have paid off, and players aren't dumb?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TecnoGenius on January 07, 2025, 04:38:51 AM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 07, 2025, 03:49:19 AMMaybe the memo's have paid off, and players aren't dumb?

It could be.  Our players seem to be able to handle things like this better than the other teams.  But still, we've seen chatter from Bombers / potential-Bombers in the past.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Waffler on January 07, 2025, 03:20:26 PM
Happy 30th birthday to Chris Streveler (Jan 6).  His rehab is looking impressive.

https://www.instagram.com/p/DEgOQg-hvJj?img_index=2
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 07, 2025, 04:01:24 PM
So, until we get a new OC, I'm guessing Streveler's future here is in limbo.  If the new OC isn't going to create a package for him, not much sense in having $SMS and a roster spot used for a SY QB.

I really wonder if there is any way to get Lapo back.  No "soft money" in the front office $SMS as far as I know. 

I guess the biggest question in that is "Does MOS want Lapo back?"  Did they work well together, and does the chain of command work?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Ridermania on January 07, 2025, 04:17:34 PM
Lapo is not getting back into coaching, he has a sweet gig with TSN.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 07, 2025, 05:59:41 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 07, 2025, 04:01:24 PMSo, until we get a new OC, I'm guessing Streveler's future here is in limbo.  If the new OC isn't going to create a package for him, not much sense in having $SMS and a roster spot used for a SY QB.

I really wonder if there is any way to get Lapo back.  No "soft money" in the front office $SMS as far as I know. 

I guess the biggest question in that is "Does MOS want Lapo back?"  Did they work well together, and does the chain of command work?

I don't think a new OC is the determining factor for Streveler. IMO he won't be re-signed. He's not the future at # 2 and a rookie can be the short yardage QB.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on January 07, 2025, 07:03:44 PM
Probably no announcement on a new OC until MOS gets back from his road trip with the Maple Leaf's. 
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on January 07, 2025, 11:28:36 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on January 07, 2025, 07:03:44 PMProbably no announcement on a new OC until MOS gets back from his road trip with the Maple Leaf's. 
What road trip??
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: ichabod_crane on January 08, 2025, 04:33:01 AM
Quote from: dd on January 07, 2025, 11:28:36 PMWhat road trip??

https://3downnation.com/2025/01/06/winnipeg-blue-bombers-head-coach-mike-oshea-invited-on-mentors-trip-with-toronto-maple-leafs/
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TecnoGenius on January 08, 2025, 07:04:49 AM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 07, 2025, 05:59:41 PMI don't think a new OC is the determining factor for Streveler. IMO he won't be re-signed. He's not the future at # 2 and a rookie can be the short yardage QB.

Picture this: It's 2019.  Zach slices his thumb mid-4th Q in the GC.  Does MOS keep Zach in after the first post-slice INT?  Or does Strev take the field then (or even before)?

We all know the answer to that.

I think Strev comes back.  If anyone can get back in play shape, it's Strev.  I think we re-sign him.  I also think by week 6 he's the SY and the injury backup (again).

Hopefully the new OC knows how to use him.  Buck sure didn't.

The only fly in the ointment would be if for some reason WFC is high on Dolegala medium/long term.  If we liked him and Wilson, then we have a problem.  Not enough money for that much mid-level talent.

I think Dolegala got a 2 year signing, meaning we're stuck with him in '25 unless we find a way to shed the contract, or just tell him to pound sand(?).  Wilson could get the treatment we've given so many didn't-pan-out hopefuls.  Who knows.

Assuming Strev can be 90% by week 6, and we still have faith in Wilson to dev into a legit starter in 1-3 more years, I'm going Buck/Strev/Wilson.  It's probably also the cheapest option.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Waffler on January 08, 2025, 02:20:03 PM
Quote from: dd on January 07, 2025, 11:28:36 PMWhat road trip??

https://www.instagram.com/p/DEi9AJRvEWM/

https://winnipegsun.com/sports/hall-of-fame-worlds-collide-bombers-oshea-joins-leafs-mentors-trip
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 08, 2025, 05:42:39 PM
Quote from: TecnoGenius on January 08, 2025, 07:04:49 AMPicture this: It's 2019.  Zach slices his thumb mid-4th Q in the GC.  Does MOS keep Zach in after the first post-slice INT?  Or does Strev take the field then (or even before)?

We all know the answer to that.

I think Strev comes back.  If anyone can get back in play shape, it's Strev.  I think we re-sign him.  I also think by week 6 he's the SY and the injury backup (again).

Hopefully the new OC knows how to use him.  Buck sure didn't.

The only fly in the ointment would be if for some reason WFC is high on Dolegala medium/long term.  If we liked him and Wilson, then we have a problem.  Not enough money for that much mid-level talent.

I think Dolegala got a 2 year signing, meaning we're stuck with him in '25 unless we find a way to shed the contract, or just tell him to pound sand(?).  Wilson could get the treatment we've given so many didn't-pan-out hopefuls.  Who knows.

Assuming Strev can be 90% by week 6, and we still have faith in Wilson to dev into a legit starter in 1-3 more years, I'm going Buck/Strev/Wilson.  It's probably also the cheapest option.


I agree, if healthy Strev. may have won that game with the help of Brady keeping the ball on the ground.  That said, he's only a short-term solution to the QB problem and offers no future upside beyond his role as a 3rd down gadget.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on January 09, 2025, 02:42:56 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 08, 2025, 05:42:39 PMI agree, if healthy Strev. may have won that game with the help of Brady keeping the ball on the ground.  That said, he's only a short-term solution to the QB problem and offers no future upside beyond his role as a 3rd down gadget.
Well a healthy Strev would have pounded the crap out of the Argos defense, and kept control of the ball and the game, and in a close game, he would have faired very well. I wouldn't be opposed to having him on our roster, but lets try to develop Wilson while we're at it.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on January 09, 2025, 04:03:23 AM
Quote from: dd on January 09, 2025, 02:42:56 AMWell a healthy Strev would have pounded the crap out of the Argos defense, and kept control of the ball and the game, and in a close game, he would have faired very well. I wouldn't be opposed to having him on our roster, but lets try to develop Wilson while we're at it.
Even when Strev was healthy he didn't pound any team  ly , let alone the argos who arguably had the best dline ly. Strev wasn't the same runner as he was last time around
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 09, 2025, 03:05:39 PM
Quote from: Pete on January 09, 2025, 04:03:23 AMEven when Strev was healthy he didn't pound any team  ly , let alone the argos who arguably had the best dline ly. Strev wasn't the same runner as he was last time around

Even so, he's still significantly better than Wilson. Would that have made enough of a difference in the GC, though? I doubt it.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 09, 2025, 04:06:45 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on January 09, 2025, 03:05:39 PMEven so, he's still significantly better than Wilson. Would that have made enough of a difference in the GC, though? I doubt it.

Less than 40% chance Strev. saves the day I think.  Thing is, even if Strev. was healthy I doubt they would have taken Zach out, they were bound to win or lose with him at QB, with no Plan B.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 09, 2025, 05:21:41 PM
Bombers seem to be the least active in announcements!!!!  What the heck. Sure it's all good if we get it done but why are we hearing so little?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 09, 2025, 07:00:51 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on January 09, 2025, 03:05:39 PMEven so, he's still significantly better than Wilson. Would that have made enough of a difference in the GC, though? I doubt it.

Don't know that Streveler is actually "significantly better" than Wilson, but what he does have is trust.  A healthy Streveler on the sidelines when Zach gets injured goes in without hesitation.  If he struggles in the first couple possesions, they might try putting Zach "I can't hold the football" back in.

Wilson hadn't had the game reps to have the confidence of Buck/MOS, so when Zach was allowed to go back in, they put him back in.

It wasn't a case of whether Wilson/Streveler would be a better player, but which had the coaches trust from longer experience. 

MOS/Buck would probably have gone with a splinted up Khari over Dinwiddie...
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: bluengold204 on January 09, 2025, 07:48:08 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 09, 2025, 05:21:41 PMBombers seem to be the least active in announcements!!!!  What the heck. Sure it's all good if we get it done but why are we hearing so little?

I suspect we are no longer the place players want to sign anymore.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Ridermania on January 09, 2025, 08:11:54 PM
Bombers Ontario Wilson signs with New York Jets.

https://3downnation.com/2025/01/09/winnipeg-blue-bombers-rec-ontaria-wilson-signs-with-new-york-jets/
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 09, 2025, 08:22:20 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on January 09, 2025, 08:11:54 PMBombers Ontario Wilson signs with New York Jets.

https://3downnation.com/2025/01/09/winnipeg-blue-bombers-rec-ontaria-wilson-signs-with-new-york-jets/

Waste of resources spent developing him so he could walk out the door a viable receiver, find a vet. with no NFL ambitions ready to go as his replacement. Darvin is available and will work for cheap!
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 09, 2025, 08:48:09 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 09, 2025, 08:22:20 PMWaste of resources spent developing him so he could walk out the door a viable receiver, find a vet. with no NFL ambitions ready to go as his replacement. Darvin is available and will work for cheap!

Disappointing to lose him after 1 year. Good luck to him, but I really don't like the NFL option window. Some say we wouldn't get some players without that. I say where would they have been otherwise in 2024?

Anyway, time to get Lawler and Schoen back on the roster with new deals.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 09, 2025, 09:33:59 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 09, 2025, 08:22:20 PMWaste of resources spent developing him so he could walk out the door a viable receiver, find a vet. with no NFL ambitions ready to go as his replacement. Darvin is available and will work for cheap!

What did it cost?  What resources were "wasted"?

We get airtime if he plays. we get him back if he doesn't.  NFL shots are a good thing for the CFL, gives us credibility to attract those fringe guys that might still have the talent for a shot at the NFL, but have run out of eyeballs on them.

We got a 1000 yard rookie of the year for zero investment, and his rights through next year if he doesn't stick, and probably the best shot of signing him if he ends up getting some time in the NFL and comes back later.

I wish we get a rookie receiver every year that we lose to the NFL, it means we got an amazing year out of a guy on an ELC.

Sure, it hurts to lose a good player, but dang, it means we are scouting great.  Schoen the year before, Wilson last year, who's next?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on January 09, 2025, 11:08:38 PM
The world is not ending, the guy got signed to a futures contract, he isn't even on the practice roster and I doubt he does. Good for him for taking his shot, but I doubt he sticks, so I don't think we really lost anything, and if we did, go find the next one, every year theres a couple of gems that surface in the CFL
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 09, 2025, 11:47:40 PM
Quote from: dd on January 09, 2025, 11:08:38 PMThe world is not ending, the guy got signed to a futures contract, he isn't even on the practice roster and I doubt he does. Good for him for taking his shot, but I doubt he sticks, so I don't think we really lost anything, and if we did, go find the next one, every year theres a couple of gems that surface in the CFL

You forget how Zach struggles with rookie receivers that don't understand the game.  If they sign Lawler and Schoen they won't need a replacement, if they don't, Wheatfall and clercius will have to step up.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on January 09, 2025, 11:51:20 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 09, 2025, 11:47:40 PMYou forget how Zach struggles with rookie receivers that don't understand the game.  If they sign Lawler and Schoen they won't need a replacement, if they don't, Wheatfall and clercius will have to step up.

If only we had one of those quarterbacks who does great with receivers who run the wrong routes into coverage looks.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: markf on January 10, 2025, 02:08:05 AM
He was able to tolerate some hard hits last season, but I wonder if  Wilson might be a bit too slight to succeed in the NFL.

The pounding is bad in the CFL, but worse in the NFL.

Good luck to him, I hope he makes it. Certainly is just as good or better, at catching the ball as a number of NFL guys I watched this season.  And had some nice runs after the catch.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 10, 2025, 01:07:55 PM
Quote from: dd on January 09, 2025, 11:08:38 PMThe world is not ending, the guy got signed to a futures contract, he isn't even on the practice roster and I doubt he does. Good for him for taking his shot, but I doubt he sticks, so I don't think we really lost anything, and if we did, go find the next one, every year theres a couple of gems that surface in the CFL

That still means we may not see him back until September. Even if he doesn't make a PR he may wait out the season trying to catch on like Ford did in 2023.

Nothing is certain including finding the next great rookie.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 10, 2025, 01:23:56 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 09, 2025, 07:00:51 PMDon't know that Streveler is actually "significantly better" than Wilson...

(https://i.giphy.com/RBeddeaQ5Xo0E.webp)

Oh, c'mon now. Streveler is absolutely, unequivocally superior to Wilson.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 10, 2025, 01:25:35 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 09, 2025, 08:22:20 PMWaste of resources spent developing him so he could walk out the door...

What a ridiculous thing to say.

This happens all the time in the CFL.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 10, 2025, 03:06:34 PM
J. Parker re-signed to a 1 year extension. I thought it was 50/50 whether he'd be back. If Ford was expected back, then we may have gone with a new rookie for depth on the PR. My view if that while we want Ford back, it's a long shot even if he doesn't get that NFL opportunity.

OTOH, I think we'll be able to re-sign Holm but Parker gives us some insurance. I don't think Parker will have an extreme contract cost and if he isn't starting at CB he can fit a role as a DI.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on January 10, 2025, 03:25:16 PM
Parker is good and would have been a reasonable cost, good signing, I knew he would be back.  Continuty pays off.  He needs to show us early he earned this though!
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on January 10, 2025, 03:34:28 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 09, 2025, 08:22:20 PMWaste of resources spent developing him so he could walk out the door a viable receiver, find a vet. with no NFL ambitions ready to go as his replacement. Darvin is available and will work for cheap!
You post makes zero sense imo.  An incredible talent we found, developed and hats off to him and the Bombers for doing so.
Disagree on vets, we keep finding good young players.  Non issue handled internally.
Sad to see him go!
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on January 10, 2025, 03:35:27 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 10, 2025, 03:06:34 PMJ. Parker re-signed to a 1 year extension. I thought it was 50/50 whether he'd be back. If Ford was expected back, then we may have gone with a new rookie for depth on the PR. My view if that while we want Ford back, it's a long shot even if he doesn't get that NFL opportunity.

OTOH, I think we'll be able to re-sign Holm but Parker gives us some insurance. I don't think Parker will have an extreme contract cost and if he isn't starting at CB he can fit a role as a DI.

Therein lies the rub with a guy like Tyrell Ford. He'd probably grade out a bit better than Parker at field corner but Parker is significantly cheaper and we've never had trouble replacing or finding guys who can play there (yes, I'm aware Parker mostly played boundary).

No saying that's what is happening but Tyrell plays at an elite level at a position which has no scarcity. Interesting dilemma. So much easier if he played half back.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 10, 2025, 03:44:57 PM
Quote from: Blueforlife on January 10, 2025, 03:25:16 PMParker is good and would have been a reasonable cost, good signing, I knew he would be back.  Continuty pays off.  He needs to show us early he earned this though!

Parker has been injured at the most inopportune time relegating him to backup once he recovers, hopefully he can stay healthy this year and establish himself as a starter. 

I don't think Ford is coming back, he gave off a weird vibe not celebrating with his teammates when they won the WF over the Riders as if it didn't really matter. He's a great player but he hasn't shown he's committed to having a football career in Wpg.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 10, 2025, 03:55:42 PM
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on January 10, 2025, 03:35:27 PMTherein lies the rub with a guy like Tyrell Ford. He'd probably grade out a bit better than Parker at field corner but Parker is significantly cheaper and we've never had trouble replacing or finding guys who can play there (yes, I'm aware Parker mostly played boundary).

No saying that's what is happening but Tyrell plays at an elite level at a position which has no scarcity. Interesting dilemma. So much easier if he played half back.

If Ford comes back I'll be happy but it would also depend on at what cost. His advantage is that he's a Canadian which we don't need in our current ratio. However, you can never have too many ratio options either.

Obviously our ratio is not set in stone at the moment. Regardless getting Parker back is a good step to take.

In all cases SMS is cumulative across the roster and won't know whether we lose any high priced potential free agents etc etc.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 10, 2025, 04:21:02 PM
Quote from: markf on January 10, 2025, 02:08:05 AMHe was able to tolerate some hard hits last season, but I wonder if  Wilson might be a bit too slight to succeed in the NFL.

The pounding is bad in the CFL, but worse in the NFL.

Good luck to him, I hope he makes it. Certainly is just as good or better, at catching the ball as a number of NFL guys I watched this season.  And had some nice runs after the catch.

Have to agree, being so slight I'm surprised Pokey lasted through last season, not a lot of meat on his bones so don't think he can bulk up much either. Hopefully he comes back early in the season as he could be a very explosive weapon once Zach figures out how to hit him in motion.

Time for the Bombers to find a big target receiver with good size like McInnis or Schaffer-Baker, Riders have done a good job drafting big Natl. receivers the last few years while the Bombers have largely struck out.  The one big target they had, BOLO, left for Hamilton.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 10, 2025, 06:15:14 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on January 10, 2025, 01:23:56 PM(https://i.giphy.com/RBeddeaQ5Xo0E.webp)

Oh, c'mon now. Streveler is absolutely, unequivocally superior to Wilson.

Well, I am glad for your certainty.  I have not seen near enough of Wilson to assess his skillset. 
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 10, 2025, 06:27:14 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 10, 2025, 06:15:14 PMWell, I am glad for your certainty.  I have not seen near enough of Wilson to assess his skillset. 

Nobody has - hence my certainty. We're not talking about potential here.

Streveler's a known commodity with the experience and stats to show that he's currently superior when compared to someone who's basically a rookie.

We know what Streveler brings to the table. The same cannot be said for Wilson, at least not yet.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 10, 2025, 07:41:02 PM
Ted Goveia takes Bombers US scout Cyril Penn with him to Hammytown, Danny Mac is the last man standing.

https://3downnation.com/2025/01/10/hamilton-tiger-cats-add-three-to-front-office-staff/

Typed too fast, Bombers add 3, including former Esks. GM Brock Sunderland.

https://3downnation.com/2025/01/10/former-edmonton-elks-general-manager-brock-sunderland-among-trio-added-to-blue-bombers-staff/
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on January 10, 2025, 08:21:37 PM
Solid adds that should replace those departed to Steeltown. We're in good shape
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: GOLDMEMBER on January 12, 2025, 03:37:21 PM
Not having Willie or Trey ford done up yet is concerning.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 12, 2025, 04:14:10 PM
Quote from: GOLDMEMBER on January 12, 2025, 03:37:21 PMNot having Willie or Trey ford done up yet is concerning.

Willie just was re-signed. Trey Ford is in Edmonton  ( lol ) but as a few of us have mentioned, we don't expect Tyrell Ford back.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on January 12, 2025, 05:05:05 PM
Evan Holm next please. Then Lawler or Schoen. 
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: GOLDMEMBER on January 12, 2025, 05:06:43 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 12, 2025, 04:14:10 PMWillie just was re-signed. Trey Ford is in Edmonton  ( lol ) but as a few of us have mentioned, we don't expect Tyrell Ford back.
I meant Tyrell.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 12, 2025, 05:12:07 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on January 12, 2025, 05:05:05 PMEvan Holm next please. Then Lawler or Schoen. 

Those are very import choices but I think Dobson might be more important due to being a Canadian. However, any one of those 4 next and I'll be happy.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on January 12, 2025, 05:23:09 PM
Farhan reporting 200k for Willie, which matches his salary from last year.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on January 12, 2025, 07:10:30 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 12, 2025, 04:14:10 PMWillie just was re-signed. Trey Ford is in Edmonton  ( lol ) but as a few of us have mentioned, we don't expect Tyrell Ford back.

I think it's actually Tre Ford.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 12, 2025, 07:21:47 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on January 12, 2025, 07:10:30 PMI think it's actually Tre Ford.

Tres bien.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TecnoGenius on January 13, 2025, 03:50:32 AM
Quote from: Jesse on January 12, 2025, 05:23:09 PMFarhan reporting 200k for Willie, which matches his salary from last year.

Word on the forum last season was Willie had taken a slight restructure discount and was more like $180?  So a slight bump for '25?

I hope the CFL has been bumping up the cap to account for the extreme inflation since 'vid.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TecnoGenius on January 13, 2025, 03:51:48 AM
Quote from: bluengold204 on January 09, 2025, 07:48:08 PMI suspect we are no longer the place players want to sign anymore.

Ya, winning the most games in the West every year and going to the cup every year and having great facilities and family support really puts a downer on signing FAs...

SMH
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TecnoGenius on January 13, 2025, 03:54:11 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 09, 2025, 04:06:45 PMLess than 40% chance Strev. saves the day I think.  Thing is, even if Strev. was healthy I doubt they would have taken Zach out

Maybe.  But 10% chance Zach saves the day with no finger.  5% chance Wilson saves the day.  4% chance Dolegala saves the day.

So the 40% chance Strev saves that GC would have been a stellar option in comparison.

I have no doubt in my mind that had they put Zach back in with Strev available, they would have pulled him for good after his first duck INT.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TecnoGenius on January 13, 2025, 03:58:01 AM
Quote from: Pete on January 09, 2025, 04:03:23 AMEven when Strev was healthy he didn't pound any team  ly , let alone the argos who arguably had the best dline ly.

Strev didn't pound any team with Buck at the helm because we didn't need/want him to (thanks Buck).  But if he's thrown in the '24 GC, he'd have no other option than to smack some pads.

Keep in mind a team will often prep for a specific QB or QB style.  TOR was prepped to beat a pure pocket passer (Zach).  What would happen if suddenly faced with a pounder?  Think '19 WDF (maybe).

In fact, I wish we had had Wilson pound it a bit, mix things up.  Kind of like when Kelly came in for MBT in the '23 GC.  The worst thing you can do is have the backup unknown guy come in in an emergency and try to just pretend to be the other QB.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 13, 2025, 01:12:46 PM
Quote from: TecnoGenius on January 13, 2025, 03:58:01 AMStrev didn't pound any team with Buck at the helm because we didn't need/want him to (thanks Buck).  But if he's thrown in the '24 GC, he'd have no other option than to smack some pads.

Keep in mind a team will often prep for a specific QB or QB style.  TOR was prepped to beat a pure pocket passer (Zach).  What would happen if suddenly faced with a pounder?  Think '19 WDF (maybe).

In fact, I wish we had had Wilson pound it a bit, mix things up.  Kind of like when Kelly came in for MBT in the '23 GC.  The worst thing you can do is have the backup unknown guy come in in an emergency and try to just pretend to be the other QB.


Hindsight is always optimistic. We'll never know if Streveler would have changed the outcome. Regardless I don't think many see him as a good # 2 QB going into 2025.

OTOH, I don't think we're comfortable with Dolegala as the # 2 either. He's certainly not going to be short yardage QB.

So where does that leave us? Wilson may be a good QB in the future. Too early to tell. I think another year as # 3 would be useful but that takes us back to the question of who is # 2?

The only option that might be a decent add is MBT if he doesn't re-negotiate in Montreal and / or is affordable. Neither seems probable.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 13, 2025, 04:04:26 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 13, 2025, 01:12:46 PMHindsight is always optimistic. We'll never know if Streveler would have changed the outcome. Regardless I don't think many see him as a good # 2 QB going into 2025.

OTOH, I don't think we're comfortable with Dolegala as the # 2 either. He's certainly not going to be short yardage QB.

So where does that leave us? Wilson may be a good QB in the future. Too early to tell. I think another year as # 3 would be useful but that takes us back to the question of who is # 2?

The only option that might be a decent add is MBT if he doesn't re-negotiate in Montreal and / or is affordable. Neither seems probable.

Like MBT There are a few other vet QB's that may be left dangling in the wind this year,
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 13, 2025, 01:12:46 PMHindsight is always optimistic. We'll never know if Streveler would have changed the outcome. Regardless I don't think many see him as a good # 2 QB going into 2025.

OTOH, I don't think we're comfortable with Dolegala as the # 2 either. He's certainly not going to be short yardage QB.

So where does that leave us? Wilson may be a good QB in the future. Too early to tell. I think another year as # 3 would be useful but that takes us back to the question of who is # 2?

The only option that might be a decent add is MBT if he doesn't re-negotiate in Montreal and / or is affordable. Neither seems probable.

There are a few other vet. QB's that may be left unprotected this year, Arbuckle, Shiltz, Crum, Masoli, Cameron Dukes, although I think it unlikely the Argos let Dukes go. Each provides a temporary level of backup security, but not much hope they will become #1 once Zach is gone.

Of this group Crum would interest me the most as a fairly efficient replacement for Strev's role, while Terry Wilson continues to develop as #2.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 13, 2025, 04:31:47 PM
BO20 got zero TD's until Steveler got injured.  That's his spot, his forte.

40% chance for Steveler, 5% chance for Wilson?  Really?  Without more game tape on Wilson, not sure how you pick that number out of the air.  And the fact that they kept him over other QB prospects says they don't agree with you.

Running Streveler with a broken foot, and Zach with a severed fingertip, we know the MO of the MOS/Buck team.  If you can play, you play. 

Wilson should have had 2 series minimum, and BO20 should have had 75% of the touches and if he didn't work, Dolegala.  Otherwise, why have backups?  Zach could not grip the ball, and had to wear a glove just to play. 
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 13, 2025, 04:43:06 PM
Well MBT has negotiated a new deal to stay in Montreal so that takes him off any potential choice list.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: VictorRomano on January 13, 2025, 04:51:36 PM
If Strev can't go, or we can't get him signed to a cap-friendly deal, I'd be looking at Tommy Stevens from Calgary as a "short-yardage-but-can't-pass-and-we-won't-ask-him-to" short yardage QB option.  Dude is a load, and as big as some DL.  If he can't put his head down on 3rd and 1 and get a yard behind our OL, I don't think anyone can.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 13, 2025, 09:23:15 PM
Quote from: VictorRomano on January 13, 2025, 04:51:36 PMIf Strev can't go, or we can't get him signed to a cap-friendly deal, I'd be looking at Tommy Stevens from Calgary as a "short-yardage-but-can't-pass-and-we-won't-ask-him-to" short yardage QB option.  Dude is a load, and as big as some DL.  If he can't put his head down on 3rd and 1 and get a yard behind our OL, I don't think anyone can.

Stevens has only complete 11 passes for 82 yards in 52 games. He'd be a good short yardage QB but that's where we want a #3 development QB.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on January 14, 2025, 02:03:44 AM
I don't know why the Stamps didn't try and develop Stevens more, from what I remember, whenver he was in he did alright. When they started those other Qb's this past season, who were gawd awful, I didn't know why Stevens didn't get the start as he surely would have faired better that those guys (I can't even recall their names, but they were baaaad)

I'd love it if we signed Stevens, absolute beast of a running Qb, never missed a game from injury, and let's see what he can do
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TecnoGenius on January 14, 2025, 06:51:49 AM
Quote from: VictorRomano on January 13, 2025, 04:51:36 PMIf Strev can't go, or we can't get him signed to a cap-friendly deal, I'd be looking at Tommy Stevens from Calgary as a "short-yardage-but-can't-pass-and-we-won't-ask-him-to" short yardage QB option.  Dude is a load, and as big as some DL.  If he can't put his head down on 3rd and 1 and get a yard behind our OL, I don't think anyone can.

Strev's '24 salary was the most cap-friendly thing I've ever seen for what he brings.  Not gonna get much more friendly than that.

As for Stevens: CGY didn't keep him?  Are they insane?  He could be the best SY QB in the whole league.  He's basically Strev jacked up 3 sizes, in terms of SY and run threat.  Maybe the better analogy is Prukop jacked up 4 sizes.

My gut says if Strev can still play and wants to play, the job is his.  He's still a fan favorite and probably a butts-in-seats draw.  But if no Strev, make a play for Stevens!  However, I think Stevens can name his price pretty much as most teams need a good SY... *if* they value SY like WFC does.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TecnoGenius on January 14, 2025, 07:03:31 AM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 13, 2025, 04:31:47 PM40% chance for Steveler, 5% chance for Wilson?  Really?  Without more game tape on Wilson, not sure how you pick that number out of the air.  And the fact that they kept him over other QB prospects says they don't agree with you.

I didn't come up with the 40% Strev number, but it sounded plausible.  And if Strev is 40, ya, I'd put Wilson at 5%.  Mostly because he's a big question mark (as you said).

The proof is in the pudding.  Wilson had his chance late-ish in the game to come in and blow up the game exactly like Kelly did in '22.  Did he?  Nope.  He failed on 2 TD attempts (yes, not all his fault, see my posts from a month ago).  His successful TD drive was really mostly a function of a friendly DPI.

Quote from: theaardvark on January 13, 2025, 04:31:47 PMWilson should have had 2 series minimum, and BO20 should have had 75% of the touches and if he didn't work, Dolegala.  Otherwise, why have backups?  Zach could not grip the ball, and had to wear a glove just to play.

He kind of did have 2 series.  Failed TDs and then successful TD.

But hey, I agree with you, Wilson should have been thrown in as soon as Zach tossed the first sliced-finger INT.  And if Wilson stinks it up just as bad, throw Dolegala in.  "The guys are here in the building for a reason" is the mantra... so give them their shot and hope one is the next Kelly, or the confusion of a switched-up play style puts TOR D off their game.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 14, 2025, 02:17:20 PM
Bombers re-sign K. Wilson and S. Gauthier. Both add value to the roster and I doubt they are expensive to retain. OTOH, I'm at least slightly surprised and wonder if this means we expect to lose Ayers and Cole?

K. Wilson can still be a productive player as the starter at WIL. All he has to do is stay healthy. The question will be whether he transitions during the course of the season to the rotation player as a DI.

Gauthier has already followed the step towards a lesser role on defence but is still very good on ST's.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: VictorRomano on January 14, 2025, 02:49:43 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 14, 2025, 02:17:20 PMK. Wilson can still be a productive player as the starter at WIL. All he has to do is stay healthy. The question will be whether he transitions during the course of the season to the rotation player as a DI.

Personally, I'd be looking to move on from Wilson.  Guy is a decent talent, but he's always hurt.  He's only played 51 games over 7 seasons with the Bombers - that's 7.x games per year.  Can't make the club from the tub.  At 32 he's on the back end of his career now anyway, and we need guys we can count on to play 15+ games every year.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 14, 2025, 03:12:05 PM
Can't hurt to add roster depth in mid-January. Two experienced LBs who can be utilized in a system they're familiar with and understand.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: markf on January 14, 2025, 03:22:14 PM
On short yardage...

Why don't they hand the ball to a running back?

There is negligible pass threat. No stats to support, but Teams almost never pass on short
Yardage.

Why give not give it to a player whose job is running the ball?

Or,if not,pass it now and then.

One of those CFL football things that makes no sense to me.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 14, 2025, 03:29:52 PM
Quote from: VictorRomano on January 14, 2025, 02:49:43 PMPersonally, I'd be looking to move on from Wilson.  Guy is a decent talent, but he's always hurt.  He's only played 51 games over 7 seasons with the Bombers - that's 7.x games per year.  Can't make the club from the tub.  At 32 he's on the back end of his career now anyway, and we need guys we can count on to play 15+ games every year.

Bet there is no upfront money or guaranteed money, so a look at TC, competition/guidance for players coming in with no cost?  No brainer. And if he is healthy, and can be the force we've seen at WIL, then its probably an amazing deal for us.

Gauthier is a ST demon, and will have a place here as long as he can motor downfield.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 14, 2025, 04:38:37 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 14, 2025, 03:29:52 PMBet there is no upfront money or guaranteed money, so a look at TC, competition/guidance for players coming in with no cost?  No brainer. And if he is healthy, and can be the force we've seen at WIL, then its probably an amazing deal for us.

Gauthier is a ST demon, and will have a place here as long as he can motor downfield.

I was 50/50 on whether we'd re-sign Wilson. Like I said, he can play at a high level but he needs to stay healthy. The question was about our other LB's that are potential free agents: Bighill and Cole along with the issue of whether Ayers is back.

SMS, ratio and roster size all come into play. That said, Wilson could have a monster season.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 14, 2025, 05:08:19 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 14, 2025, 04:38:37 PMI was 50/50 on whether we'd re-sign Wilson. Like I said, he can play at a high level but he needs to stay healthy. The question was about our other LB's that are potential free agents: Bighill and Cole along with the issue of whether Ayers is back.

SMS, ratio and roster size all come into play. That said, Wilson could have a monster season.

Ayers is under contract and there won't be too many teams pursuing a fringe player like Cole, so I expect them both back and playing bigger roles next season.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 14, 2025, 05:19:48 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 14, 2025, 05:08:19 PMAyers is under contract and there won't be too many teams pursuing a fringe player like Cole, so I expect them both back and playing bigger roles next season.

The issue with Ayers is whether he gets a future's deal in the NFL. The issue with Cole is the potential number of import LB's we might have and roster availability. Cole showed some promise but so did Ayers. Ayers is on and ELC and Cole won't be very expensive. It wouldn't be a bad thing to get both back and injuries happen in TC.

It's too early to tell what happens with Ayers, Cole or Bighill. Just guessing we lose Ford and it means we have room for 1 less import than in 2024. We had several imports that were not full time starters and were not DI's due to being able to start 8 or 9 Canadians.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 14, 2025, 05:49:27 PM
Has the NFL signing window closed?  IIRC it is the first week of Feb, before the tampering window.

Ayers has had look see's but no offers yet, right?  He is still on his ELC, so not a huge $SMS hit for what we're getting.

I think we will be fine on D, there's enough beef in the pipe to compete for Willie's bookend, and we might get competition for them falling to us through FA.  Would have been interesting to bring back a refocused Kongbo, but no doubt he got a good contract in CGY.

Cauz is suggesting the FA we should look at is Ceresna. Not sure he fits the personality profile as a Bomber, and has he been healthy?  Averaged 12 games a year in the first 4, but 18 and 17 the last 2, was that play, injury or other? He's going to be expensive as well...

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 14, 2025, 06:08:29 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 14, 2025, 05:49:27 PMHas the NFL signing window closed?  IIRC it is the first week of Feb, before the tampering window.

Ayers has had look see's but no offers yet, right?  He is still on his ELC, so not a huge $SMS hit for what we're getting.

I think we will be fine on D, there's enough beef in the pipe to compete for Willie's bookend, and we might get competition for them falling to us through FA.  Would have been interesting to bring back a refocused Kongbo, but no doubt he got a good contract in CGY.

Cauz is suggesting the FA we should look at is Ceresna. Not sure he fits the personality profile as a Bomber, and has he been healthy?  Averaged 12 games a year in the first 4, but 18 and 17 the last 2, was that play, injury or other? He's going to be expensive as well...



NFL option window still open for a few weeks. IDK if Ayers will get a futures deal or not. Yes his ELC is not an issue, it's just whether he comes back.

DL options are very open. I think we have 4 DL as potential free agents. Not all may be asked back. Which will be back is a work in progress. I'm not sold on anyone we had replacing Jeffcoat but nobody had an injury free season and that resulted in a revolving door.

Ford has no obligation to return to the CFL at all even if he doesn't get an immediate offer. He may take longer to decide and there is no guarantee he returns to Winnipeg as an actual free agent. The organization might have an idea of what his intentions are but obviously won't make that public.

So he could be re-signed, or lost to NFL or test CFL free agency in February and move elsewhere. I can see Edmonton making a pitch to improve their defence and ratio options.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: BLUEBOMBER on January 14, 2025, 06:18:26 PM
Streveler is totally unncessary... he shouldn't have returned in the first place.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 14, 2025, 06:19:50 PM
Quote from: BLUEBOMBER on January 14, 2025, 06:18:26 PMStreveler is totally unncessary... he shouldn't have returned in the first place.

Couldn't disagree more.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 14, 2025, 06:26:00 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on January 14, 2025, 06:19:50 PMCouldn't disagree more.

Why? Clearly he's never going to be a legit # 2. So he's not the future and not even a really good short term back up. He's a SY specialist and that's where you want your development QB. He's not that either so again I ask why other than he's a fan favourite.

We don't know / don't have a solid immediate #2 QB. That may be Wilson but we don't know. If he's the next Brown, then we need the " next " SY / development guy on an ELC.

Steveler isn't getting big money but it might be $40K more than an ELC rookie.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 14, 2025, 06:32:05 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 14, 2025, 06:26:00 PMWhy? Clearly he's never going to be a legit # 2.

Was he brought in to be QB2? I don't think so. He's a known commodity and contributed positively before he was injured by a serial scumbag. His being a fan favourite was merely a bonus.

I just do not agree with the assertion he was an unnecessary signing.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 14, 2025, 07:20:38 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 14, 2025, 05:19:48 PMThe issue with Ayers is whether he gets a future's deal in the NFL. The issue with Cole is the potential number of import LB's we might have and roster availability. Cole showed some promise but so did Ayers. Ayers is on and ELC and Cole won't be very expensive. It wouldn't be a bad thing to get both back and injuries happen in TC.

It's too early to tell what happens with Ayers, Cole or Bighill. Just guessing we lose Ford and it means we have room for 1 less import than in 2024. We had several imports that were not full time starters and were not DI's due to being able to start 8 or 9 Canadians.

As far as I can figure they really only have 1 LB too many if all are healthy and that includes Bighill. Cole is a multi-position player who could play, WIL, SAM, DB or Safety but may not be consistent enough to start anywhere.  Depending what they decide to do with Biggie could determine somebody else's fate.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on January 14, 2025, 07:22:13 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on January 14, 2025, 06:32:05 PMWas he brought in to be QB2? I don't think so. He's a known commodity and contributed positively before he was injured by a serial scumbag. His being a fan favourite was merely a bonus.

I just do not agree with the assertion he was an unnecessary signing.

I was very excited to see Strev come back last season, but he was either not used effectively or for some reason couldn't be as effective as his first go around with us.

It was a very disappointing showing.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 14, 2025, 07:28:33 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 14, 2025, 07:22:13 PMI was very excited to see Strev come back last season, but he was either not used effectively or for some reason couldn't be as effective as his first go around with us.

It was a very disappointing showing.

Maybe that problem's gone now that he's HC of the Lions. I dunno.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 14, 2025, 07:28:46 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on January 14, 2025, 06:32:05 PMWas he brought in to be QB2? I don't think so. He's a known commodity and contributed positively before he was injured by a serial scumbag. His being a fan favourite was merely a bonus.

I just do not agree with the assertion he was an unnecessary signing.

I'm sure Strev. thought things would turn out better when he re-signed in Wpg. and he'd be in good position to qualify for a starting job somewhere in the CFL after one year back.  It didn't work out that way and I can't see him progressing beyond his role as a 3rd down specialist now.  A new OC, may be his last chance to change the course of his career.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 14, 2025, 07:39:00 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on January 14, 2025, 06:32:05 PMWas he brought in to be QB2? I don't think so. He's a known commodity and contributed positively before he was injured by a serial scumbag. His being a fan favourite was merely a bonus.

I just do not agree with the assertion he was an unnecessary signing.

No but he was listed as the # 2 QB because we had a rookie with no CFL experience. I listed why I don't think he fits the role as either a # 2 or SY  QB.  I agree he filled a need positively however that doesn't change my opinion that it's time to move on.

Preferably Dolegala earns the role as our # 2 QB and Wilson becomes our SYS and development QB.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 14, 2025, 07:42:21 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 14, 2025, 07:20:38 PMAs far as I can figure they really only have 1 LB too many if all are healthy and that includes Bighill. Cole is a multi-position player who could play, WIL, SAM, DB or Safety but may not be consistent enough to start anywhere.  Depending what they decide to do with Biggie could determine somebody else's fate.

That's about the size of it but as I mentioned you have to consider SMS and roster size. Aside from Ayers, none of these players is going to sit on the PR.

If there are no signing bonus's then let them fight it out in TC I suppose.

I'd add that while Griffin is listed as a DB, IMO he's the next up at SAM so add that into the mix about multi role abilities on our defence. He's not a potential free agent and could see a role options.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TecnoGenius on January 15, 2025, 05:45:43 AM
Quote from: markf on January 14, 2025, 03:22:14 PMOn short yardage...

Why don't they hand the ball to a running back?

One/some CFL teams have/are.  Results seemed positive (at least as good success rate as our SY).

Watching the NFL playoffs I see that the NFL seems to have picked up on the concept (probably where the CFL got the idea from).

However, there are downsides:

1. You want to have a pass option threat on 2nd & 1 for the "free play".  Using a RB negates that.  And even on 3rd & 1 you want the occasional (once a season?) pass threat.

2. You are forced to AR 3 QBs.  Period.  So one QB is basically a "free dress" so why not make him the SY specialist?  He's not really doing anything else in-game the entire season.

3. The RB has a lot to focus on already, and should be mastering his "normal RB stuff", not figuring out how to accept C handoffs.  If it's your backup RB, maybe you can forget this point.

For 2 years or so we experimented with direct snaps and wildcats to AH33.  They almost always failed or went disastrously wrong.  Even in a GC if memory serves.  Cadence issues, IP, failed handoffs, general disarray.  This probably soured MOS on the idea for life.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on January 15, 2025, 02:56:40 PM
https://www.bluebombers.com/2025/01/15/blue-bombers-re-sign-defensive-back-evan-holm/

Keg cog and great signing
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on January 15, 2025, 03:01:14 PM
Happy to  have Evan back, but it would have been nice if it was 2 or 3 years.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on January 15, 2025, 03:16:39 PM
https://3downnation.com/2025/01/15/kyle-walters-not-ruling-out-winnipeg-blue-bombers-retaining-kenny-lawler-dalton-schoen/
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 15, 2025, 04:39:16 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on January 15, 2025, 03:01:14 PMHappy to  have Evan back, but it would have been nice if it was 2 or 3 years.

With the threat of Trump and our falling dollar, signing a multi-year deal right now might be a risky move.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 15, 2025, 04:44:01 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 15, 2025, 04:39:16 PMWith the threat of Trump and our falling dollar, signing a multi-year deal right now might be a risky move.

Yeah, I don't think either of those will affect anything. One-year deals have been the most common across the league for years now.

Contracts aren't guaranteed, anyway.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 15, 2025, 05:54:37 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on January 15, 2025, 04:44:01 PMYeah, I don't think either of those will affect anything. One-year deals have been the most common across the league for years now.

Contracts aren't guaranteed, anyway.

What I meant is if the CDN. dollar slips to 50 cents in the next year as it might, Yanks are going to want an increase on their next contract to make up for the exchange. It could become a league wide issue as it would make it that much harder to attract new American players to the CFL.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 15, 2025, 05:55:58 PM
Kyle Walters interview, well worth reading the entire article.

On Ford: "My understanding is they're going to explore all NFL opportunities right to the end. He's not even looking to talk CFL offers. I spoke to his agent, and they just want to focus on NFL opportunities right now. We wish him the best of luck. If he can get into an NFL camp that would be great for him. If he doesn't then he's clearly going to be a highly sought-after player."

And Dobson: "I've spoken to his agent, and they want to see the offensive line market for Canadians. It's pretty high for some of these guys and Liam was an all-star and did very well as a starter so his agent, rightfully so, is expecting a very big raise. He's part of that interesting puzzle on how to make it all work."

https://3downnation.com/2025/01/15/kyle-walters-not-ruling-out-winnipeg-blue-bombers-retaining-kenny-lawler-dalton-schoen/
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 15, 2025, 05:59:25 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 15, 2025, 05:54:37 PMWhat I meant is if the CDN. dollar slips to 50 cents in the next year as it might, Yanks are going to want an increase on their next contract to make up for the exchange. It could become a league wide issue as it would make it that much harder to attract new American players to the CFL.

I understand the premise but the CFL would be in big trouble if the dollar drops that much. The league would have to adjust the CBA on the SMS level and ELC etc.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 15, 2025, 06:06:53 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 15, 2025, 05:54:37 PMWhat I meant is if the CDN. dollar slips to 50 cents in the next year as it might, Yanks are going to want an increase on their next contract to make up for the exchange. It could become a league wide issue as it would make it that much harder to attract new American players to the CFL.

The CFL would have much bigger challenges to deal with should the CAD drop that much*. Additionally, American players would have no real leverage in such a situation.

* I also don't see such a thing happening
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 15, 2025, 06:21:42 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 15, 2025, 05:59:25 PMI understand the premise but the CFL would be in big trouble if the dollar drops that much. The league would have to adjust the CBA on the SMS level and ELC etc.

So, if the dollar strengthens, does that mean they can lower the $SMS?

I'm not sure that reducing the reliance on US trade will negatively affect our dollar.  We trade with the US out of convenience, at a discount.  If we got fair prices from the US, or chose other trading partners, I think the value of our goods, and with it our GDP will go up.

Trump doesn't realize how good he has it trading with us.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 15, 2025, 06:38:06 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on January 15, 2025, 06:06:53 PMThe CFL would have much bigger challenges to deal with should the CAD drop that much*. Additionally, American players would have no real leverage in such a situation.

* I also don't see such a thing happening

Disagree, on one year contracts Imports could decide to leave and not come back if the CFL did nothing, whether to play in another league or move on with their careers earning US dollars.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 15, 2025, 06:48:49 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 15, 2025, 06:21:42 PMSo, if the dollar strengthens, does that mean they can lower the $SMS?

I'm not sure that reducing the reliance on US trade will negatively affect our dollar.  We trade with the US out of convenience, at a discount.  If we got fair prices from the US, or chose other trading partners, I think the value of our goods, and with it our GDP will go up.

Trump doesn't realize how good he has it trading with us.

It's not so easy to find a replacement for your biggest customer. A 25% tariff will reduce trade dramatically, less demand for Canadian products, less profit and less investment in our economy, the negative effects on the GDP would be massive.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 15, 2025, 06:49:04 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 15, 2025, 06:21:42 PMSo, if the dollar strengthens, does that mean they can lower the $SMS?

I'm not sure that reducing the reliance on US trade will negatively affect our dollar.  We trade with the US out of convenience, at a discount.  If we got fair prices from the US, or chose other trading partners, I think the value of our goods, and with it our GDP will go up.

Trump doesn't realize how good he has it trading with us.

The closer the Canadian dollar is to par, the better it will be towards signing Americans. I don't expect it to reach par but even if it did, I don't expect to lower the SMS as a result.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 15, 2025, 07:44:45 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 15, 2025, 06:38:06 PMDisagree, on one year contracts Imports could decide to leave and not come back if the CFL did nothing, whether to play in another league or move on with their careers earning US dollars.

How's that leverage? American players aren't coming to the CFL because they have options in the US.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 15, 2025, 08:19:06 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 15, 2025, 05:55:58 PMKyle Walters interview, well worth reading the entire article.

On Ford: "My understanding is they're going to explore all NFL opportunities right to the end. He's not even looking to talk CFL offers. I spoke to his agent, and they just want to focus on NFL opportunities right now. We wish him the best of luck. If he can get into an NFL camp that would be great for him. If he doesn't then he's clearly going to be a highly sought-after player."

And Dobson: "I've spoken to his agent, and they want to see the offensive line market for Canadians. It's pretty high for some of these guys and Liam was an all-star and did very well as a starter so his agent, rightfully so, is expecting a very big raise. He's part of that interesting puzzle on how to make it all work."

https://3downnation.com/2025/01/15/kyle-walters-not-ruling-out-winnipeg-blue-bombers-retaining-kenny-lawler-dalton-schoen/

Currently there are 20 Canadian OL that are potential free agents.  I don't want to lose Dobson but we can't control what he thinks he wants or whether we're willing to pay it.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 15, 2025, 08:19:18 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on January 15, 2025, 07:44:45 PMHow's that leverage? American players aren't coming to the CFL because they have options in the US.

I don't follow US football at all, have both new leagues failed?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: bluebeard on January 15, 2025, 08:22:11 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on January 15, 2025, 07:44:45 PMHow's that leverage? American players aren't coming to the CFL because they have options in the US.

I agree, plus our dollar is now a new Mexican peso. :-[
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 15, 2025, 08:24:45 PM
(https://media4.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTc5MGI3NjExcGs5MHQ1dzJlM2FzOGhvcXVlNnJudHZoZzZxeHowdXk4ZTF4dzF6aCZlcD12MV9pbnRlcm5hbF9naWZfYnlfaWQmY3Q9Zw/gdX4XYo08vNvlERm35/giphy.gif)
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: ModAdmin on January 15, 2025, 09:29:37 PM
Let's make sure we leave politics out of the discussions.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on January 15, 2025, 10:07:31 PM
Not sure we ll give Dobson big pay raise, he may have to go to Ottawa for that. We have Eli and Wallace waiting in the wings who can do just as good a job at a fraction of the cost. Yes, they are imports, but our ratio can be met in other ways.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 15, 2025, 10:13:57 PM
Quote from: dd on January 15, 2025, 10:07:31 PMNot sure we ll give Dobson big pay raise, he may have to go to Ottawa for that. We have Eli and Wallace waiting in the wings who can do just as good a job at a fraction of the cost. Yes, they are imports, but our ratio can be met in other ways.

Huh? Eli and Wallace are Canadians not imports. Or was that a typo / spellcheck saying they instead of there are imports.

In any case, I guess he wants to check his market value. There may even be a team that will overpay to land a starting OL. Bombers can't control that but that doesn't mean he leaves either.

It just means we won't know until to free tampering window dust settles.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 15, 2025, 11:11:16 PM
Quote from: ModAdmin on January 15, 2025, 09:29:37 PMLet's make sure we leave politics out of the discussions.

We're discussing economics, not politics!
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on January 15, 2025, 11:30:14 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 15, 2025, 10:13:57 PMHuh? Eli and Wallace are Canadians not imports. Or was that a typo / spellcheck saying they instead of there are imports.

In any case, I guess he wants to check his market value. There may even be a team that will overpay to land a starting OL. Bombers can't control that but that doesn't mean he leaves either.

It just means we won't know until to free tampering window dust settles.

History tells us Walters lets him walk if he wants big $$. We lost Dejarlais, Couture, and Chung the same way, and all were much better than Dobson.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: ModAdmin on January 16, 2025, 01:48:51 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 15, 2025, 11:11:16 PMWe're discussing economics, not politics!

When names of politicians enter into a discussion, it's a known fact that involves politics.  My message was to ensure the discussion did not devolve to politics.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: GOLDMEMBER on January 16, 2025, 03:52:57 AM
The Bombers should sign Trump as OC! :D
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Ridermania on January 16, 2025, 01:28:28 PM
And Dobson: "I've spoken to his agent, and they want to see the offensive line market for Canadians. It's pretty high for some of these guys and Liam was an all-star and did very well as a starter so his agent, rightfully so, is expecting a very big raise. He's part of that interesting puzzle on how to make it all work."

Is Dobson a $175K player due to his passport?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: drahgon on January 16, 2025, 02:34:12 PM
Jake is back
https://3downnation.com/2025/01/16/winnipeg-blue-bombers-re-sign-canadian-dl-jake-thomas/ (https://3downnation.com/2025/01/16/winnipeg-blue-bombers-re-sign-canadian-dl-jake-thomas/)
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TBURGESS on January 16, 2025, 02:53:55 PM
Quote from: drahgon on January 16, 2025, 02:34:12 PMJake is back
https://3downnation.com/2025/01/16/winnipeg-blue-bombers-re-sign-canadian-dl-jake-thomas/ (https://3downnation.com/2025/01/16/winnipeg-blue-bombers-re-sign-canadian-dl-jake-thomas/)
Yuk.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 16, 2025, 03:13:30 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 15, 2025, 06:48:49 PMIt's not so easy to find a replacement for your biggest customer. A 25% tariff will reduce trade dramatically, less demand for Canadian products, less profit and less investment in our economy, the negative effects on the GDP would be massive.

Less AMERICAN demand for our products, but on a global stage, our products are well liked, and we can get MORE for them elsewhere, but we prefer the convenience of the US.

I really think trade in the Pacific will boom if Trump Tariffs us, other countries hi by tariffs will be looking for new trade partners.  "America first" is not a death knell for any other country, at all.  Shifting our trading partners can increase the value of our goods.  The little maple leaf logo means a lot, I have associates in the pet industry that are developing products specifically for the Asian market because they love "Made In Canada" quality assurance.

Its easy to be doom and gloom about Trump, but it will, in my opinion, improve Canada's trade immeasurably.  Be it oil, raw materials, lumber or finished goods, the US has bought from us at a discount, especially with our dollars being divergent.

The US is going to f around and find out, when you have a trade deficit with someone, its because you need more of their product than you can sell them of yours.  And tariffs increase costs, create inflation and that will not be popular with Americans.

4.3 million barrels a day of oil flows to America from Canada.  We can sell that elsewhere for more.  Or, we can drop an export tariff of $10 barrel on that export and add $16 billion a year to our coffers.  And still the US would be getting our crude at a dscount.  Canadian crude is at $54/barrel, spot oil now is closer to $80

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 16, 2025, 03:14:59 PM
Quote from: drahgon on January 16, 2025, 02:34:12 PMJake is back
https://3downnation.com/2025/01/16/winnipeg-blue-bombers-re-sign-canadian-dl-jake-thomas/ (https://3downnation.com/2025/01/16/winnipeg-blue-bombers-re-sign-canadian-dl-jake-thomas/)

Awesome signing.  Rotating with Lawson gives us ratio and run stopping.

Plus, he's great depth at 8th Olineman.  I wonder if they ever considered flipping him across the line full time...
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 16, 2025, 03:19:09 PM
We're getting announcements on a daily basis now. I wasn't sure Thomas would be re-signed but if Lawson wins the starters role, then Thomas would be good depth. It's not likely he has an expensive contract and his experience is valuable.

I'm not a fan favourite, but I understand the decision.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 16, 2025, 05:07:01 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 16, 2025, 03:19:09 PMWe're getting announcements on a daily basis now. I wasn't sure Thomas would be re-signed but if Lawson wins the starters role, then Thomas would be good depth. It's not likely he has an expensive contract and his experience is valuable.

I'm not a fan favourite, but I understand the decision.

Jake is an easy target to pick on and criticize yet the Bomber coaching staff keep throwing him out there play after play, game after game, so I assume he's executing his assignments effectively to the satisfaction of the coaching staff and his team mates. The fact he plays every single game and participates in every single practice, and has for over 5 years is a testament to both his reliability and durability as an athlete. While younger players fall by the wayside from injury and fatigue, Jake and Willie remain constants on the Bomber D-line game after game, year after year.

I think the criticism mostly comes from people who think it's a DT's main job to put pressure on the QB, which is a fairly new phenomenon as most old school DT's rarely got anywhere near the QB on most plays, think Cleyon Laing and Ted Laurent. Their main role was to plug up the middle and help close down running lanes so the RB can't slip through, as far as I can tell Jake still does this quite well. Hybrid DT/DE's like Casey Sayles and Jamal Woods now have more speed and mobility and can be used in different ways, but that shouldn't devaluate a player that plays a more basic role and does it well.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on January 16, 2025, 05:53:15 PM
DT is the blue collar position on the DL, very little glory, and every play is a battle. I m hoping we can find a DT that can generate a bigger push than Thomas does and be a bit quicker. Jake is the only Bomber that I know I can outrun, still a team guy and he'll play a support role, decent signing.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: VictorRomano on January 16, 2025, 05:58:59 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 16, 2025, 03:13:30 PMLess AMERICAN demand for our products, but on a global stage, our products are well liked, and we can get MORE for them elsewhere, but we prefer the convenience of the US.

There is one thing that the US gets from Canada as a sole-source supplier that few Americans and Canadians know about:  Tritium and related rare-earth minerals needed to produce night-vision scopes and goggles, as well as near-field infrared optics.  That includes the new cutting-edge Near-Field IR Augmented Reality goggles that the US has currently sent to Ukraine for battlefield evaluation.  These use IR and AI to remove cover and concealment on the battlefield.  Think Predator-vision for real, except it can see *through* bushes and buildings.

If Canada and the US get into a trade war and we cut that supply off, the lights go out on the battlefield for American soldiers, pilots, tankies and sailors.

I don't imagine the US is going to like that for long.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 20, 2025, 04:07:45 PM
Quote from: VictorRomano on January 16, 2025, 05:58:59 PMThere is one thing that the US gets from Canada as a sole-source supplier that few Americans and Canadians know about:  Tritium and related rare-earth minerals needed to produce night-vision scopes and goggles, as well as near-field infrared optics.  That includes the new cutting-edge Near-Field IR Augmented Reality goggles that the US has currently sent to Ukraine for battlefield evaluation.  These use IR and AI to remove cover and concealment on the battlefield.  Think Predator-vision for real, except it can see *through* bushes and buildings.

If Canada and the US get into a trade war and we cut that supply off, the lights go out on the battlefield for American soldiers, pilots, tankies and sailors.

I don't imagine the US is going to like that for long.

That's one thing I wouldn't stop shipping to the US. It's a critical mineral in the war effort etc. Even stopping shipping oil and gas is problematic. I don't want a bunch of Americans freezing because we want to retaliate. I understand the idea, but I draw the line on that sort of idea.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 20, 2025, 04:23:32 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 20, 2025, 04:07:45 PMThat's one thing I wouldn't stop shipping to the US. It's a critical mineral in the war effort etc. Even stopping shipping oil and gas is problematic. I don't want a bunch of Americans freezing because we want to retaliate. I understand the idea, but I draw the line on that sort of idea.



So, you want tariffs to hurt Canadian exports, but want to take the most effective deterrents off the table?

I think the reasonable compromise is to impose export tariffs on these goods.  $20/barrel on oil (we give them our oil at a discount right now, about $20/barrel lower than the world price), so that tariff would raise huge money for us, and level the pricing playing field to make Canadian oil same price as Venezuelan.

As to the rare earth minerals, again, export tariffs would be a deterrent that doesn't stop the flow.  Maybe a cap on exports as well, quotas. 

Any of our exports they want to threaten have markets outside the US.  We will sell them, regardless, its just the US is the most convenient right now.  We do need to upgrade our ports and transportation infrastructure to facilitate ocean exporting of a lot that we truck or rail to the states right now.  An upgrade at Churchill would be a huge boon to Canada's export capacity.  Either a pipeline or increased rail to there would get oil to export market, or even transport to eastern Canada.  And we need more refineries.  Makes no sense to ship crude to the US and buy back gas. 
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 20, 2025, 04:31:49 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 20, 2025, 04:23:32 PMSo, you want tariffs to hurt Canadian exports, but want to take the most effective deterrents off the table?

I think the reasonable compromise is to impose export tariffs on these goods.  $20/barrel on oil (we give them our oil at a discount right now, about $20/barrel lower than the world price), so that tariff would raise huge money for us, and level the pricing playing field to make Canadian oil same price as Venezuelan.

As to the rare earth minerals, again, export tariffs would be a deterrent that doesn't stop the flow.  Maybe a cap on exports as well, quotas. 

Any of our exports they want to threaten have markets outside the US.  We will sell them, regardless, its just the US is the most convenient right now.  We do need to upgrade our ports and transportation infrastructure to facilitate ocean exporting of a lot that we truck or rail to the states right now.  An upgrade at Churchill would be a huge boon to Canada's export capacity.  Either a pipeline or increased rail to there would get oil to export market, or even transport to eastern Canada.  And we need more refineries.  Makes no sense to ship crude to the US and buy back gas. 


That's not close to what I said. Tariffs are paid by the importer. If we're actually giving the US a discount, their tariff would move cost closer to par. Since they require our petroleum they will still import it. How would restricting export by Canada help us? It's one of the largest export products from Alberta in particular.

Trump is upset about the trade imbalance. Doesn't he understand the population of the  US is 10X of Canada? There will never be a balanced trade between our countries. Canada exports more raw materials and the US exports more finished goods.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 20, 2025, 05:54:59 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 20, 2025, 04:31:49 PMThat's not close to what I said. Tariffs are paid by the importer. If we're actually giving the US a discount, their tariff would move cost closer to par. Since they require our petroleum they will still import it. How would restricting export by Canada help us? It's one of the largest export products from Alberta in particular.

Trump is upset about the trade imbalance. Doesn't he understand the population of the  US is 10X of Canada? There will never be a balanced trade between our countries. Canada exports more raw materials and the US exports more finished goods.

You can impose export tariffs as punitive response.  I would make exports more lucrative rather than restrict them.  And if the price is too high, they can look elsewhere for supply.  A large part (14%) of our export of oil through the Keystone pipeline is tar sands oil that it refined in the Gulf area and exported. Doesn't even enter the US market. So its the refineries that are buying cheap Canadian crude and exporting it.  Putting an export tariff on that just makes sense.

As long as we export our raw materials to a country 10 times our size, and import only finished goods for a country 1/10th the size of thiers, we will have a trade imbalance.  They want our resources, but not our finished goods (cars) or things like Dairy (so much better and safer than US products, we will see if RFK does anything about the dairy industry, GMO cows are scary.) 



   
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 20, 2025, 08:09:22 PM
Not sure what you are trying to say. Tariffs are taxes by the importing country not on the exporting country.


Tariff. Tariffs are taxes imposed by one country on goods imported from another country. Tariffs are trade barriers that raise prices, reduce available quantities of goods and services for US businesses and consumers, and create an economic burden on foreign exporters.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: ModAdmin on January 20, 2025, 08:33:55 PM
This is a free agent topic. Let's stick to that.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: GOLDMEMBER on January 21, 2025, 12:23:01 AM
Schoen signed?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Horseman on January 21, 2025, 01:49:08 AM
Andrew Harris is the Riders (spit) running backs coach...traitor!
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: J5V on January 21, 2025, 02:36:36 AM
Quote from: GOLDMEMBER on January 21, 2025, 12:23:01 AMSchoen signed?
I haven't heard anything on Shoen. He a F/A as of Feb. so I imagine he's going to test the market and go to the highest bidder.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on January 21, 2025, 02:59:53 PM
https://www.bluebombers.com/2025/01/21/blue-bombers-transactiosn-january-21/

Sounds promising
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 21, 2025, 03:42:36 PM
Quote from: Blueforlife on January 21, 2025, 02:59:53 PMhttps://www.bluebombers.com/2025/01/21/blue-bombers-transactiosn-january-21/

Sounds promising

Could be a good addition to watch in TC. There are bound to be many new DB's that are always needed to compete. We only have Bridges left from 2024 that spent most of his time on the PR.

I'm not saying Bridges won't stick but we'll need some quality players to cover for injury and depth on the PR.

Every TC there are a dozen new receivers and DB's to be able run drills.

The comments about this player comparing him to Ayers and Cole skill sets is a good starting point. Now if I can just remember where I read that, I'd attach that analysis.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 21, 2025, 05:10:13 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 21, 2025, 03:42:36 PMCould be a good addition to watch in TC. There are bound to be many new DB's that are always needed to compete. We only have Bridges left from 2024 that spent most of his time on the PR.

I'm not saying Bridges won't stick but we'll need some quality players to cover for injury and depth on the PR.

Every TC there are a dozen new receivers and DB's to be able run drills.

The comments about this player comparing him to Ayers and Cole skill sets is a good starting point. Now if I can just remember where I read that, I'd attach that analysis.

Michael Griffin also pushing for a spot, at 213 lbs. he has a lot more muscle than the average DB who are typically sub 200 lbs., suggesting he's better suited to SAM or playing inside DB. His play on ST and filling in raised some eyebrows last season, they'll want to find a place on the field for him.

Can't find Souleymane Karamoko on roster or FA list, don't know what status he has, but likely they've moved on.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 21, 2025, 05:23:38 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 21, 2025, 05:10:13 PMMichael Griffin also pushing for a spot, at 213 lbs. he has a lot more muscle than the average DB who are typically sub 200 lbs., suggesting he's better suited to SAM or playing inside DB. His play on ST and filling in raised some eyebrows last season, they'll want to find a place on the field for him.

Can't find Souleymane Karamoko on roster or FA list, don't know what status he has, but likely they've moved on.

Maybe Griffin fights for the FS spot?  Not sure where BA is in his career, he hasn't really been spectacular of late.  Maybe he set the bar too high early.  He's a FA, not sure what his ask will be, but if Griffin can take over, there some savings there.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 21, 2025, 05:27:00 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 21, 2025, 05:10:13 PMMichael Griffin also pushing for a spot, at 213 lbs. he has a lot more muscle than the average DB who are typically sub 200 lbs., suggesting he's better suited to SAM or playing inside DB. His play on ST and filling in raised some eyebrows last season, they'll want to find a place on the field for him.

Can't find Souleymane Karamoko on roster or FA list, don't know what status he has, but likely they've moved on.

I consider Griffin as part of the AR and not likely going to lose his spot / role. He's sort of a hybrid DB / LB and was a very good ST player. He as on the AR for 15 games plus post season.

I agree he could be a guy that is moved to safety or in rotation over the course of the season. We'll see what happens with Alexander who is a potential free agent.

Karamoko was on the PR to end the season and as such is now a free agent.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 21, 2025, 05:42:40 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 21, 2025, 05:27:00 PMI consider Griffin as part of the AR and not likely going to lose his spot / role. He's sort of a hybrid DB / LB and was a very good ST player. He as on the AR for 15 games plus post season.

I agree he could be a guy that is moved to safety or in rotation over the course of the season. We'll see what happens with Alexander who is a potential free agent.

Karamoko was on the PR to end the season and as such is now a free agent.

Neither Griffin or Cole have a starting role or a fixed spot, could be they keep Griffin and let Cole walk which would be a pity as they're both great athletes that offer much versatility.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on January 21, 2025, 05:59:56 PM
Griffin is also very good on teams. Finished the year with 16 STs. 1 behind Ayers. I would like to see Cole back he's very quick and plays a physical game. 24 DTs last year for a backup is pretty decent.

Another player that needs more playing time is Devin Adams. He only played a limited amount of time and had a pretty good season 16 DTs, 1 ST, 4 Sacks. 
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 21, 2025, 06:34:59 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on January 21, 2025, 05:59:56 PMGriffin is also very good on teams. Finished the year with 16 STs. 1 behind Ayers. I would like to see Cole back he's very quick and plays a physical game. 24 DTs last year for a backup is pretty decent.

Another player that needs more playing time is Devin Adams. He only played a limited amount of time and had a pretty good season 16 DTs, 1 ST, 4 Sacks. 

Wasn't Adams injured for part of the season?  Seems like all the new D-linemates took their turn on the IR last season.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on January 21, 2025, 07:01:35 PM
Some good discussion here.

Can anyone remind of what they liked in Bridges?

I would like to see Cole, Adams and Griffin continue their development and get more reps.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 21, 2025, 07:07:47 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 21, 2025, 05:42:40 PMNeither Griffin or Cole have a starting role or a fixed spot, could be they keep Griffin and let Cole walk which would be a pity as they're both great athletes that offer much versatility.

Like most teams the Bombers rotate many players on and off the field. So it depends on what you mean about a fixed spot. Both players spent a lot of time on the field on defence because they have good skills. Both made plays and were all over the field hustling.

Essentially if you're on the AR that happens on the front 7 in order to keep players fresh. If an in game injury occurs they will spend more time in the resulting shuffle.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 21, 2025, 07:15:48 PM
Quote from: Blueforlife on January 21, 2025, 07:01:35 PMSome good discussion here.

Can anyone remind of what they liked in Bridges?

I would like to see Cole, Adams and Griffin continue their development and get more reps.

Bridges made the AR for several games as our strongest / best DB we had on the PR when we needed a DI. Depth chart showed him mostly at DHB but he probably has some versatility. He didn't seem to be as involved on ST's as some others but that doesn't mean he wouldn't see more in 2025.

Like many rookies, making the AR might take an injury or standing out on ST's or in relief. Getting on the AR or reps when you do is not always possible due to ratio and roster size.

I expect to see Bridges kept around but that may still mean more time on the PR waiting his turn barring injury. The team didn't leave him on the PR to end the season which means they liked what they saw.

I like Cole but he's a pending free agent and he may choose another team that might give him a better chance to start etc.

At the moment, I think there is a good chance we re-sign him. If Ayers returns, spots on the AR are limited but his versatility can't be discounted.  Keeping in mind our depth at LB shuffled when Wilson was injured and somewhat before Griffin showed well.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 21, 2025, 08:22:43 PM
The 3 DL set put a lot of extra reps in for the extra DB's.  And Griffin was noticeable during those sets.

I think we are going to be just fine at DB, new blood coming in and still lots of talent on the roster. 
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 21, 2025, 09:08:23 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 21, 2025, 07:15:48 PMBridges made the AR for several games as our strongest / best DB we had on the PR when we needed a DI. Depth chart showed him mostly at DHB but he probably has some versatility. He didn't seem to be as involved on ST's as some others but that doesn't mean he wouldn't see more in 2025.

Like many rookies, making the AR might take an injury or standing out on ST's or in relief. Getting on the AR or reps when you do is not always possible due to ratio and roster size.

I expect to see Bridges kept around but that may still mean more time on the PR waiting his turn barring injury. The team didn't leave him on the PR to end the season which means they liked what they saw.

I like Cole but he's a pending free agent and he may choose another team that might give him a better chance to start etc.

At the moment, I think there is a good chance we re-sign him. If Ayers returns, spots on the AR are limited but his versatility can't be discounted.  Keeping in mind our depth at LB shuffled when Wilson was injured and somewhat before Griffin showed well.

MOS seems like a guy who does not like to backtrack once he's given a player a commitment, he usually moves forward with Plan B. I think Pokey, Ayers and Ford have to be careful coming back from the NFL too late, O'Shea may give their jobs away to other players and they might have a hard time getting them back.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 21, 2025, 09:15:29 PM
Ayers hasn't been released for an NFL option deal yet as far as I know. Ford's situation is different as an actual pending free agent. He can take longer to decide and is not bound to Winnipeg past free agency.

There is a good chance Ayers returns as option window is not open too much longer.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 22, 2025, 04:37:31 PM
Free agency is rapidly approaching. Only a few might test free agency. Others are just coming off of ELC's so what is the delay in re-signing Fox, Haba and Garbutt for example? Are one or more of that group not part of the plans in 2025?

I was expecting at least a couple more of our potential free agents to be re-signed this week. All I hear is crickets!!!
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 22, 2025, 04:51:57 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 22, 2025, 04:37:31 PMFree agency is rapidly approaching. Only a few might test free agency. Others are just coming off of ELC's so what is the delay in re-signing Fox, Haba and Garbutt for example? Are one or more of that group not part of the plans in 2025?

I was expecting at least a couple more of our potential free agents to be re-signed this week. All I hear is crickets!!!

Walters may be trying to hold the line on offering large salary bumps to some of these 3rd year players, pushing them to test FA to see if they can get offers more to their liking.  Bit of a risky strategy for Bombers as they could lose a few players they've invested a lot of time in to offers of marginal difference. When a player goes elsewhere a full explanation of their reasoning is never provided, they're just gone.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 22, 2025, 05:18:25 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 22, 2025, 04:51:57 PMWalters may be trying to hold the line on offering large salary bumps to some of these 3rd year players, pushing them to test FA to see if they can get offers more to their liking.  Bit of a risky strategy for Bombers as they could lose a few players they've invested a lot of time in to offers of marginal difference. When a player goes elsewhere a full explanation of their reasoning is never provided, they're just gone.

Could be. Even 3rd year players may have exaggerated views of their value. OTOH, Dobson, Lawler, Schoen, Fox, Garbutt, Haba and a couple of others important pieces of the team. We've already lost O. Wilson and we don't want to lose a large number of players at one time.

That said we've remained somewhat status quo bringing back K. WIlson, Gauthier, Parker and Thomas. That may not have been a bad thing but there are players in the succession plan for some older vets.

A few others like Augustine, Cole, Feltmate, Lofton and Alexander can play a role but are in TBD territory.

Those I don't expect back: Streveler, Benson, Whitehead, Bighill, Taylor and Noah Hallett
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 22, 2025, 05:31:24 PM
Any player we lose to another team means a player they had becomes available... so, sure, letting them hit FA is a risk, and I am sure in the tampering period we will lose some, but I will not be surprised if we get some back there.

Last year, we lost Hardrick, which gave us Lofton.  Change happens
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on January 22, 2025, 06:01:37 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 21, 2025, 09:08:23 PMMOS seems like a guy who does not like to backtrack once he's given a player a commitment, he usually moves forward with Plan B. I think Pokey, Ayers and Ford have to be careful coming back from the NFL too late, O'Shea may give their jobs away to other players and they might have a hard time getting them back.


I think you're right on this. MOS is loyal to a fault with his players, and he will be reluctant to pull a player off the field once he's played 10 or so games and is committed to the BB in favour of someone coming back from a failed NFL attempt. As good as Ford is, if we have a DB doing a decent job at his spot, I'll be surprised if MOS even cares if Ford comes back.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 22, 2025, 06:27:13 PM
Ahhh, I thought Michael Ayers signed with an NFL team before Christmas, but it looks like he only received a workout offer. So likely he'll be back on time for TC.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on January 23, 2025, 04:39:22 PM
Not much happening in Bomber land lately. Need a signing. Lawler, Schoen, Dobson .....
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 23, 2025, 05:11:09 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on January 23, 2025, 04:39:22 PMNot much happening in Bomber land lately. Need a signing. Lawler, Schoen, Dobson .....

What was Schoen's injury and will he even be ready for TC? If that part of the holdup?  I see several teams have been locking up their top and expensive potential free agent receivers. Elks and Lions still haven't re-signed their receivers.

Free agency tampering might re-set perceived values for a bunch of these players. Downward IMO.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on January 23, 2025, 06:22:16 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 23, 2025, 05:11:09 PMWhat was Schoen's injury and will he even be ready for TC? If that part of the holdup?  I see several teams have been locking up their top and expensive potential free agent receivers. Elks and Lions still haven't re-signed their receivers.

Free agency tampering might re-set perceived values for a bunch of these players. Downward IMO.

I am sure Buck would like either Schoen or Lawler.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 23, 2025, 06:28:09 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on January 23, 2025, 06:22:16 PMI am sure Buck would like either Schoen or Lawler.

Buck inherited a plethora of Rec depth, with much $SMS committed.  I can't see them adding a Rec without cutting a few loose...
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 23, 2025, 06:41:15 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on January 23, 2025, 06:22:16 PMI am sure Buck would like either Schoen or Lawler.

But at what cost?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 23, 2025, 07:21:50 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on January 23, 2025, 06:41:15 PMBut at what cost?

Lions have good receivers if they can re-sign them. I don't see them in the market of needing to look elsewhere to pay significant money to a receiver other then their own.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 23, 2025, 07:24:32 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 23, 2025, 07:21:50 PMLions have good receivers if they can re-sign them. I don't see them in the market of needing to look elsewhere to pay significant money to a receiver other then their own.

My thoughts exactly. They have a very good receiving corps as is. Targeting Schoen or Lawler doesn't make sense, IMO.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 23, 2025, 08:12:50 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 23, 2025, 07:21:50 PMLions have good receivers if they can re-sign them. I don't see them in the market of needing to look elsewhere to pay significant money to a receiver other then their own.

Rigmaiden said in a recent interview they are looking to cut their receiver budget and would even be interested in trading away a few high salaries.  Their upper mark was around $225k, common sense eventually drags receivers back down below $200k again.  Nobody paying Gino Lewis $300k.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 23, 2025, 08:55:51 PM
Only McInnis (their best WR) is a potential free agent, the rest are on the books, with roster bonuses coming.  When they get released, the market for Lawler and Schoen may wobble.  Might be in their best interest to get signed now..

BC has a lot of FA's, 8 DL's, they've extended 3...

McMaster    

BC LIONS
PLAYER    A/N/G    POS    COLLEGE    STATUS
ANTWI Jeshrun    N    RB    Calgary    
ARCHIBALD Joshua    N    DL    McGill    
BANKS Joshua    A    DL    Wake Forest    
CHERRY Nathan    N    DL    Saskatchewan    
CHUNGH Sukh    N    OL    Calgary    
COUTURE Michael    N    OL    Simon Fraser    
EDWARDS-COOPER Jalon    A    DB    Texas A&M Commerce    
EVANS Ciante    A    DB    Nebraska    
FLINTOFT Stefan    A    P    UCLA    
GREENE Adrian    N    DB    Saint Mary's    
KNEVEL David    N    OL    Nebraska    
LEE T.J.    A    DB    Eastern Washington    
MACKIE David    N    RB    Western University    
MCINNIS Justin    N    WR    Arkansas State    
MOORE Marcus    A    DL    Utah State    
PEIRSON Andrew    N    OL    Gannon    
PERKINS Kent    A    OL    Texas    
ROBERTSON Pete    A    DL    Texas Tech    
RUGAMBA Emmanuel    A    LB    Miami of Ohio    
SCHLEUGER Chris    A    OL    Alabama Birmingham    


Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 23, 2025, 09:45:15 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 23, 2025, 08:55:51 PMOnly McInnis (their best WR) is a potential free agent, the rest are on the books, with roster bonuses coming.  When they get released, the market for Lawler and Schoen may wobble.  Might be in their best interest to get signed now..

BC has a lot of FA's, 8 DL's, they've extended 3...

McMaster    

BC LIONS
PLAYER    A/N/G    POS    COLLEGE    STATUS
ANTWI Jeshrun    N    RB    Calgary    
ARCHIBALD Joshua    N    DL    McGill    
BANKS Joshua    A    DL    Wake Forest    
CHERRY Nathan    N    DL    Saskatchewan    
CHUNGH Sukh    N    OL    Calgary    
COUTURE Michael    N    OL    Simon Fraser    
EDWARDS-COOPER Jalon    A    DB    Texas A&M Commerce    
EVANS Ciante    A    DB    Nebraska    
FLINTOFT Stefan    A    P    UCLA    
GREENE Adrian    N    DB    Saint Mary's    
KNEVEL David    N    OL    Nebraska    
LEE T.J.    A    DB    Eastern Washington    
MACKIE David    N    RB    Western University    
MCINNIS Justin    N    WR    Arkansas State    
MOORE Marcus    A    DL    Utah State    
PEIRSON Andrew    N    OL    Gannon    
PERKINS Kent    A    OL    Texas    
ROBERTSON Pete    A    DL    Texas Tech    
RUGAMBA Emmanuel    A    LB    Miami of Ohio    
SCHLEUGER Chris    A    OL    Alabama Birmingham    




Getting McInnis a new deal is going to require the other receivers to re-negotiate if they want to stay in Vancouver.

Lions also added an expensive OL acquired in trade. General belief they had to trim their SMS before all of this coming out of 2024.

Then there is their actual list of potential free agents.

It's possible that Lawler and / or Schoen move to another team but Vancouver wouldn't appear to be position to make that happen at the moment.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 23, 2025, 10:22:03 PM
So, Buck is going to lose at least some of his WR talent, and has to get Rourke into CFL form.

Tough job...
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on January 23, 2025, 10:59:33 PM
McInnes is going to come cheap...neither is Chungh....there will be some salary cutbacks elsewhere if they sign these 2
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on January 24, 2025, 04:32:26 AM
Haba is going to test the waters in FA.  2024: 10 Games, 6 DTs, 1 Sack, 1 FF.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 24, 2025, 12:57:30 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on January 24, 2025, 04:32:26 AMHaba is going to test the waters in FA.  2024: 10 Games, 6 DTs, 1 Sack, 1 FF.

Interesting. I wasn't even sure he'd be re-signed or if he was, not a huge bump in SMS. It's so hard to evaluate our DL with all the injuries and rotation used on defence. He made some plays and has some upside. Is it enough to command interest elsewhere?

I guess we'll see.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 24, 2025, 04:10:05 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 24, 2025, 12:57:30 PMInteresting. I wasn't even sure he'd be re-signed or if he was, not a huge bump in SMS. It's so hard to evaluate our DL with all the injuries and rotation used on defence. He made some plays and has some upside. Is it enough to command interest elsewhere?

I guess we'll see.

He had a headstart on Garbutt but by the end of the season fell behind his progression.  Wouldn't cry if neither of them won the job opposite Willy, they're  okay but not great.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 24, 2025, 04:32:11 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 24, 2025, 04:10:05 PMHe had a headstart on Garbutt but by the end of the season fell behind his progression.  Wouldn't cry if neither of them won the job opposite Willy, they're  okay but not great.

I agree although there is possible upside for both. That said when Walter's mentioned he might be more active in free agency, the DL was where I thought that most probable.

If we're able to re-sign our offensive players, that's already a strong group. Our secondary and LB's are good which leaves DL as the target to improve.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 24, 2025, 05:02:35 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 24, 2025, 04:32:11 PMI agree although their is possible upside for both. That said when Walter's mentioned he might be more active in free agency, the DL was where I thought that most probable.

If we're able to re-sign our offensive players, that's already a strong group. Our secondary and LB's are good which leaves DL as the target to improve.

I'd like to see them go after another rangy DE bookend like AC Leonard or Cedric Wilcots, who they traded to the Ti-Cats 2 seasons ago, and they cut last year.  I prefer DE's who use speed and moves over brute strength....a player just like Jackson Jeffcoat!
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 24, 2025, 05:22:08 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 24, 2025, 05:02:35 PMI'd like to see them go after another rangy DE bookend like AC Leonard or Cedric Wilcots, who they traded to the Ti-Cats 2 seasons ago, and they cut last year.  I prefer DE's who use speed and moves over brute strength....a player just like Jackson Jeffcoat!

I don't think either of those 2 are being considered. Someone like them perhaps. We'll see which players reach free agency or tampering period to see if we draw some muutal interest.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 24, 2025, 05:22:34 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 24, 2025, 04:32:11 PM...DL as the target to improve.

This should be priority #1, IMO.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on January 24, 2025, 11:13:45 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 24, 2025, 05:22:08 PMI don't think either of those 2 are being considered. Someone like them perhaps. We'll see which players reach free agency or tampering period to see if we draw some muutal interest.
Lanier or Albright would be good adds
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 24, 2025, 11:48:39 PM
Any DE's that are known to fans are going to be too expensive.  Talk all you like about which FA's out there are a good fit, its going to be tough to fit any in under the cap.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on January 25, 2025, 01:52:51 AM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 24, 2025, 11:48:39 PMAny DE's that are known to fans are going to be too expensive.  Talk all you like about which FA's out there are a good fit, its going to be tough to fit any in under the cap.

Not more than we were paying Lawler and Schoen.

If it's where we want to allocate the cap, it's more than possible.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 25, 2025, 06:31:20 AM
Quote from: Pete on January 24, 2025, 11:13:45 PMLanier or Albright would be good adds

Lucky if you can get a half season out of Lanier, Sask. made him the highest paid defensive player at one time paying him more than Willie Jefferson and every year he finds his way onto the 6 game so he can extend his career another season. He's one of the reasons Sask. had such a bad locker room culture, Lanier and Duke Williams are players of low character with zero integrity.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Ridermania on January 25, 2025, 12:26:44 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 25, 2025, 06:31:20 AMLucky if you can get a half season out of Lanier, Sask. made him the highest paid defensive player at one time paying him more than Willie Jefferson and every year he finds his way onto the 6 game so he can extend his career another season. He's one of the reasons Sask. had such a bad locker room culture, Lanier and Duke Williams are players of low character with zero integrity.

Haven't heard Duke Williams name for a few seasons.  Bad blast from the past.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 25, 2025, 01:31:10 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 24, 2025, 11:48:39 PMAny DE's that are known to fans are going to be too expensive.  Talk all you like about which FA's out there are a good fit, its going to be tough to fit any in under the cap.

True. I don't know if we'll land a free agent DE but a DT might be less expensive and fill a need as well.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on January 25, 2025, 05:42:21 PM
we haven't signed Haba or Garbutt and we've only signed one american other than Jefferson (brand Wright). So something has to happen.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on January 25, 2025, 09:00:57 PM
Quote from: Pete on January 25, 2025, 05:42:21 PMwe haven't signed Haba or Garbutt and we've only signed one american other than Jefferson (brand Wright). So something has to happen.
I m happy we haven't signed them....they aren't the answer for us. I' m thinking there must be something coming down the pipeline
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on January 25, 2025, 09:26:20 PM
Quote from: dd on January 25, 2025, 09:00:57 PMI m happy we haven't signed them....they aren't the answer for us. I' m thinking there must be something coming down the pipeline
Disagree that they are not the answer
Always something in the pipe yes

Quote from: theaardvark on January 24, 2025, 11:48:39 PMAny DE's that are known to fans are going to be too expensive.  Talk all you like about which FA's out there are a good fit, its going to be tough to fit any in under the cap.
Agree

Quote from: Jesse on January 25, 2025, 01:52:51 AMNot more than we were paying Lawler and Schoen.

If it's where we want to allocate the cap, it's more than possible.
Those receivers are critical to sign and worth every penny
DL good place to save a buck imo, has worked before but we need a stud, I hope we can develop or find one in camp
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: VictorRomano on January 26, 2025, 12:20:18 AM
Now that we know the outcome of the Bighill situation, I think we should consider putting some money on the table for Jake Ceresna.  We need more QB pressures.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on January 26, 2025, 12:38:17 AM
Quote from: VictorRomano on January 26, 2025, 12:20:18 AMNow that we know the outcome of the Bighill situation, I think we should consider putting some money on the table for Jake Ceresna.  We need more QB pressures.
Pass too $ imo
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on January 26, 2025, 12:43:45 AM
Quote from: VictorRomano on January 26, 2025, 12:20:18 AMNow that we know the outcome of the Bighill situation, I think we should consider putting some money on the table for Jake Ceresna.  We need more QB pressures.
aggree , at some point we need to invest more in defense, currently our roster is very heavily invested in the offence with questionable returns
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: DM83 on January 26, 2025, 12:46:32 AM
Great idea
We have to have a very good defense if we want to win the cup.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 26, 2025, 01:19:37 PM
Quote from: DM83 on January 26, 2025, 12:46:32 AMGreat idea
We have to have a very good defense if we want to win the cup.

We gave up the least amount of points again in 2024. Defence was very good but had some systemic problems on the DL.  The 3 man rush was partly an issue of injuries to several players throughout the season. No continuity.

I'm not sure what to think of Haba, Garbutt or Fox. They may be the future. Regardless we need to beef up at DT in particular.

None of those 3 have been re-signed. I don't know if that is a message to them or the team they want big raises?

All of that could change become clearer in a few days.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 26, 2025, 06:02:45 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 26, 2025, 01:19:37 PMWe gave up the least amount of points again in 2024. Defence was very good but had some systemic problems on the DL.  The 3 man rush was partly an issue of injuries to several players throughout the season. No continuity.

I'm not sure what to think of Haba, Garbutt or Fox. They may be the future. Regardless we need to beef up at DT in particular.

None of those 3 have been re-signed. I don't know if that is a message to them or the team they want big raises?

All of that could change become clearer in a few days.

To be honest none of them have shown enough to demand a significant raise.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on January 26, 2025, 08:11:27 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 26, 2025, 06:02:45 PMTo be honest none of them have shown enough to demand a significant raise.
I think that creates a good spot for us, bring em back at team friendly deals, they will continue to improve imo, find a stud at camp.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 26, 2025, 08:13:57 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 26, 2025, 06:02:45 PMTo be honest none of them have shown enough to demand a significant raise.

No but it's a lot to ask for them after only playing a few games. Haba has played the most with 18 games, mostly as a rotation player. Garbutt has only played in 12 games and Fox in 7 games. Not all of these games defined them as starters per se. Lots of rotation in 2023 with Jeffcoat and in 2024 with each other etc.


That's the odd thing. I don't expect them to draw interest elsewhere with any upfront money. OTOH we haven't signed them either.

OTOH, I'd rather not start with a bunch more rookies so having them back to compete is the base starting point in theory.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 26, 2025, 08:16:27 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 26, 2025, 01:19:37 PMWe gave up the least amount of points again in 2024. Defence was very good but had some systemic problems on the DL.  The 3 man rush was partly an issue of injuries to several players throughout the season. No continuity.

I'm not sure what to think of Haba, Garbutt or Fox. They may be the future. Regardless we need to beef up at DT in particular.

None of those 3 have been re-signed. I don't know if that is a message to them or the team they want big raises?

All of that could change become clearer in a few days.

We have Schmeckle, Thomas and Lawson under contract, all NAT's.  Fox is our only FA DT.  Haba and Garbutt are DE's.

We have Jefferson at DE signed.  So that's 4 DL under contract, 3 starters.

We need a DE or two, wither our own FA's or an available FA, as well as recruits being brought in.  We've had good luck in the past finding DT talent, and other teams have stolen them away.  I have no issues continuing that modus operandi.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 26, 2025, 08:44:52 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 26, 2025, 08:16:27 PMWe have Schmeckle, Thomas and Lawson under contract, all NAT's.  Fox is our only FA DT.  Haba and Garbutt are DE's.

We have Jefferson at DE signed.  So that's 4 DL under contract, 3 starters.

We need a DE or two, wither our own FA's or an available FA, as well as recruits being brought in.  We've had good luck in the past finding DT talent, and other teams have stolen them away.  I have no issues continuing that modus operandi.

I'd say we have 2 starters in those mentioned. One DT and 1 DE. Then we have Canadian depth at DT. We do have Adams under contract and I'd say he's ahead of Fox on the DT depth chart. 

Also have Kornelson returning as a DT candidate. We'll only have 2 Canadian DT's on the AR, so it's more of a fight for the PR for a couple.

The fact that we used a 3 man DL so often suggests we did not have strength at DT, although we had injury issues.

I wonder if Haba and Garbutt are looking towards USFL due to dollar devaluation, shorter season and similar money?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on January 26, 2025, 10:22:49 PM
Quote from: VictorRomano on January 26, 2025, 12:20:18 AMNow that we know the outcome of the Bighill situation, I think we should consider putting some money on the table for Jake Ceresna.  We need more QB pressures.
Totally agree. If we had a pass rush, we'd have been grey cup champs this year. Instead, our feeble 'contain' DL made a backup QB look like Tom Brady. We HAVE to upgrade our other DE position and those we had there need not apply, they've showed us their stuff and it was nothing.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on January 27, 2025, 02:19:39 AM
Quote from: dd on January 26, 2025, 10:22:49 PMTotally agree. If we had a pass rush, we'd have been grey cup champs this year. Instead, our feeble 'contain' DL made a backup QB look like Tom Brady. We HAVE to upgrade our other DE position and those we had there need not apply, they've showed us their stuff and it was nothing.
We lost the cup this year because all three phases laid an egg imo
Can't put it all on the DL
Need to improve next year in many areas including DL to make it to the show again
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on January 27, 2025, 11:07:02 AM
Quote from: Blueforlife on January 26, 2025, 12:38:17 AMPass too $ imo

He'd be absolutely worth it at a spot of weakness for us.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 27, 2025, 03:36:39 PM
Quote from: VictorRomano on January 26, 2025, 12:20:18 AMNow that we know the outcome of the Bighill situation, I think we should consider putting some money on the table for Jake Ceresna.  We need more QB pressures.

Not sure Ceresna is Bomber material.  Sure, he has the chops, but does he have an attitude that is accepted in the room?  Not sure why I think this, just the vibe I feel when discussing him.  I could be wrong, but he feels like a "Me first" player.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on January 27, 2025, 04:08:39 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 27, 2025, 03:36:39 PMNot sure Ceresna is Bomber material.  Sure, he has the chops, but does he have an attitude that is accepted in the room?  Not sure why I think this, just the vibe I feel when discussing him.  I could be wrong, but he feels like a "Me first" player.

I have no idea if what you're suggesting about Ceresna is true but I don't like the rational. The best coaches get buy in from players who are hard to coach. Part of the benefits of a good culture is that you should be able to absorb some of more difficult attributes and get buy in. A strong locker room should allow us more options not less. What is the point of paying the premium for veteran leadership if we don't use it?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 27, 2025, 04:10:11 PM
Come on Bombers, let's get some of our potential free agents signed to new deals. There must be at least 6 or 7 we plan to bring back??????????????

A week away from tampering period. OTOH, it's also a week away from Ayers not getting an NFL deal, so chances improving that he'll be back.

OC decision? I didn't buy we're waiting for an NFL coaching choice and waiting for his team to be eliminated. In any case, that's down to two teams.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 27, 2025, 04:29:30 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 27, 2025, 04:10:11 PMCome on Bombers, let's get some of our potential free agents signed to new deals. There must be at least 6 or 7 we plan to bring back??????????????

A week away from tampering period. OTOH, it's also a week away from Ayers not getting an NFL deal, so chances improving that he'll be back.

OC decision? I didn't buy we're waiting for an NFL coaching choice and waiting for his team to be eliminated. In any case, that's down to two teams.

Pretty clear O'Shea is waiting to pick his OC from the SuperBowl winning team and  doesn't want to be stuck with the loser.

As for Ceresna, not a team in the league that wouldn't want him, so his price is going to be riding on the high side of very expensive.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 27, 2025, 04:34:42 PM
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on January 27, 2025, 04:08:39 PMI have no idea if what you're suggesting about Ceresna is true but I don't like the rational. The best coaches get buy in from players who are hard to coach. Part of the benefits of a good culture is that you should be able to absorb some of more difficult attributes and get buy in. A strong locker room should allow us more options not less. What is the point of paying the premium for veteran leadership if we don't use it?

It doesn't take a lot to poison the room.  Again, MOS and Walters have done a great job in making a harmonious room, and to pay a premium for a player, he'd better fit perfectly.  Like Biggie did.  You don't want to pay extra AND have to make him fit / coach him up.

Quote from: Blue In BC on January 27, 2025, 04:10:11 PMCome on Bombers, let's get some of our potential free agents signed to new deals. There must be at least 6 or 7 we plan to bring back??????????????

A week away from tampering period. OTOH, it's also a week away from Ayers not getting an NFL deal, so chances improving that he'll be back.

OC decision? I didn't buy we're waiting for an NFL coaching choice and waiting for his team to be eliminated. In any case, that's down to two teams.

I think we will see a lot of players signed the day before the tampering window, and some during.  No reason not to try the waters, although I'm sure the deal to sign now drops $5-10k if they don't get offers during the tampering window.  A little incentive to sign now.  Or the deal stays the same $, but signing bonus/guaranteed money in year 2 goes away.  Those are incentives to sign now. 

Plus, if the window allows us to land a replacement for someone shopping around, they might find thier job filled already.

If the players do get offers, I'm sure Walters will listen to upping an offer, but I'm pretty sure they have a budget and a plan.  Now, should a big name, like Lawler, Schoen, Dobson tell Walters they are taking the ridiculous offer elsewhere, I'm not sure if they up offers to our FA's, or chase after others.

As to OC, how many OC jobs are left open in the CFL?  Are we competing with anyone to fill that spot?  So, we have all the leverage, all the choices. And while having the OC in place means one more person for input as to the roster, pretty sure Walters, the scouts and MOS have that handled.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 27, 2025, 05:05:11 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 27, 2025, 04:34:42 PMIt doesn't take a lot to poison the room.  Again, MOS and Walters have done a great job in making a harmonious room, and to pay a premium for a player, he'd better fit perfectly.  Like Biggie did.  You don't want to pay extra AND have to make him fit / coach him up.

I think we will see a lot of players signed the day before the tampering window, and some during.  No reason not to try the waters, although I'm sure the deal to sign now drops $5-10k if they don't get offers during the tampering window.  A little incentive to sign now.  Or the deal stays the same $, but signing bonus/guaranteed money in year 2 goes away.  Those are incentives to sign now. 

Plus, if the window allows us to land a replacement for someone shopping around, they might find thier job filled already.

If the players do get offers, I'm sure Walters will listen to upping an offer, but I'm pretty sure they have a budget and a plan.  Now, should a big name, like Lawler, Schoen, Dobson tell Walters they are taking the ridiculous offer elsewhere, I'm not sure if they up offers to our FA's, or chase after others.

As to OC, how many OC jobs are left open in the CFL?  Are we competing with anyone to fill that spot?  So, we have all the leverage, all the choices. And while having the OC in place means one more person for input as to the roster, pretty sure Walters, the scouts and MOS have that handled.

Don't forget two of their scouts left for Hamilton and they have 3 newbies in the room working with them. 
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on January 27, 2025, 09:10:16 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 27, 2025, 03:36:39 PMNot sure Ceresna is Bomber material.  Sure, he has the chops, but does he have an attitude that is accepted in the room?  Not sure why I think this, just the vibe I feel when discussing him.  I could be wrong, but he feels like a "Me first" player.

Jesus H. ******, aards.

That is blowing a whole lot of smoke out of your butt with absolutely nothing to back it up.

Elite player at an area of weakness. If he's available, I hope and expect Walters to do everything he can to land Ceresna.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 27, 2025, 09:12:20 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 27, 2025, 05:05:11 PMDon't forget two of their scouts left for Hamilton and they have 3 newbies in the room working with them. 

We will miss Ted, for sure, but I think we may have increased our scouting potential, short and long term.

Three guys from different organizations with eyes on different players.  And I'm sure anyone Ted and company had on the radar for this year, well, we know about them.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Horseman on January 27, 2025, 09:20:56 PM
Rose from Calgary was released, he would greatly improve our DT position.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 27, 2025, 09:22:55 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 27, 2025, 09:10:16 PMJesus H. ******, aards.

That is blowing a whole lot of smoke out of your butt with absolutely nothing to back it up.

Elite player at an area of weakness. If he's available, I hope and expect Walters to do everything he can to land Ceresna.

I was just stating my opinion.  Ceresna is an elite player, no doubt.  Made $212k in 2024, made 29 tackles and 8 sacks.  Took out Tyrie Adams with a low hit. 

What is his ask this year?  Thinking we can get a better deal elsewhere.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 27, 2025, 09:47:13 PM
He was on a futures contract but Grainger decided to retire. I have no doubt we would be looking at other QB's in mini camps and on our neg lists. Essentially we're looking for one to have available on our PR or sitting near the phone after TC.

We haven't kept a # 4 on the PR for a few years but it's not a bad idea. I still have no idea where Wilson will end up after TC. Is he our # 2 and if so does that make Dolegala expendable since he's not the SY QB.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on January 27, 2025, 10:52:44 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 27, 2025, 09:22:55 PMI was just stating my opinion.  Ceresna is an elite player, no doubt.  Made $212k in 2024, made 29 tackles and 8 sacks.  Took out Tyrie Adams with a low hit. 

What is his ask this year?  Thinking we can get a better deal elsewhere.


Likely he will be in the same range this year, the reason he didn't get paid more was that he received a 100k bonus ly. We might be able to get Rose for a lower price but he's not the same impact player as Ceresna any more
Other options would be Brinkman or Robbie Smith from the argos, but Ceresna would be my preference
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on January 28, 2025, 04:37:14 AM
Quote from: Jesse on January 27, 2025, 11:07:02 AMHe'd be absolutely worth it at a spot of weakness for us.
I am not interested in spending that much cash on one player at this position.  That money would have a bigger impact elsewhere as we might develop or find a cheaper option.

Quote from: Horseman on January 27, 2025, 09:20:56 PMRose from Calgary was released, he would greatly improve our DT position.
Good numbers, any quess how much he would cost?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on January 28, 2025, 10:40:11 AM
Quote from: Blueforlife on January 28, 2025, 04:37:14 AMI am not interested in spending that much cash on one player at this position.  That money would have a bigger impact elsewhere as we might develop or find a cheaper option.

Well, I disagree.

We're spending more at other positions. We spent much more on two receivers in the same position group.

Their DL is the reason we've had so much trouble against Toronto the past few years. It's lost us two Grey Cups. We'd be fools to ignore that.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Waffler on January 28, 2025, 03:19:12 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 27, 2025, 09:47:13 PMHe was on a futures contract but Grainger decided to retire. I have no doubt we would be looking at other QB's in mini camps and on our neg lists. Essentially we're looking for one to have available on our PR or sitting near the phone after TC.

We haven't kept a # 4 on the PR for a few years but it's not a bad idea. I still have no idea where Wilson will end up after TC. Is he our # 2 and if so does that make Dolegala expendable since he's not the SY QB.

The free agent QB's are slim pickings at best. Arbuckle and a 37 year old Masoli leading the rankings.
https://3downnation.com/2025/01/28/2025-cfl-free-agent-rankings-quarterbacks/

I feel like we need, and I mean NEED, a strong 2nd stringer. Not sure where that is coming from. Appears to be Zach or bust again.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on January 28, 2025, 03:30:45 PM
Well, Feb.11 is not far away and not much happening for the Bombers.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 28, 2025, 03:32:38 PM
(https://y.yarn.co/08f0a0e0-97aa-4101-b9bc-3ed219976a46_text.gif)
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 28, 2025, 03:41:56 PM
We have 4 organizations worth of prospect lists at QB.  Wilson has barely a year in the CFL, so we have no idea how well he will do.  Dolegala, well, we will see how he fares with the new OC in camp. 

Picking up another "known quantity" might happen if Dolegala flames out, but not until.

I expect that we will have a few more arms in camp, and you never know when you are going to strike gold.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 28, 2025, 04:04:30 PM
Quote from: Waffler on January 28, 2025, 03:19:12 PMThe free agent QB's are slim pickings at best. Arbuckle and a 37 year old Masoli leading the rankings.
https://3downnation.com/2025/01/28/2025-cfl-free-agent-rankings-quarterbacks/

I feel like we need, and I mean NEED, a strong 2nd stringer. Not sure where that is coming from. Appears to be Zach or bust again.

Yes, we're in a bit of a pickle. As fans we don't know what we have in Wilson. He could turn out to be a solid # 2 in his 2nd year. We will probably see at least another couple of QB's added for TC and will have looked at more during mini camps.

Wilson seems to have the raw talent but we haven't seen him play much. Most of us haven't seen how he looks in practice.

I've said it before, I'm not sure where Dolegala stands. He's not the future IMO and he's not the SY QB. At the moment, he is the QB with the most experience. Fingers are crossed that we find someone that is the future.

I'm not a fan of bringing in an older veteran QB that will cost us too much. OTOH, it depends on what management thinks of those we have as back ups.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on January 28, 2025, 04:14:09 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 28, 2025, 03:41:56 PMWe have 4 organizations worth of prospect lists at QB.  Wilson has barely a year in the CFL, so we have no idea how well he will do.  Dolegala, well, we will see how he fares with the new OC in camp. 

Picking up another "known quantity" might happen if Dolegala flames out, but not until.

I expect that we will have a few more arms in camp, and you never know when you are going to strike gold.

Unfortunately, they can't bring neg list prospects with them.

Dolegala...think he might have flamed out a few years ago, tbh.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 28, 2025, 04:19:42 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 28, 2025, 04:04:30 PMYes, we're in a bit of a pickle. As fans we don't know what we have in Wilson. He could turn out to be a solid # 2 in his 2nd year. We will probably see at least another couple of QB's added for TC and will have looked at more during mini camps.

Wilson seems to have the raw talent but we haven't seen him play much. Most of us haven't seen how he looks in practice.

I've said it before, I'm not sure where Dolegala stands. He's not the future IMO and he's not the SY QB. At the moment, he is the QB with the most experience. Fingers are crossed that we find someone that is the future.

I'm not a fan of bringing in an older veteran QB that will cost us too much. OTOH, it depends on what management thinks of those we have as back ups.

Cost has multiple faces.  $SMS is one thing, roster/development spot is another.  Plugging in a has been that "might have something left in the tank", and then finding out, nope, its empty can really cost a team.  Even on an incentive laden deal, it prevents us from getting reps to development guys.

Dolegala is right in that sweet spot of having shown something, but we don't know if that is everything.  We can suspect where his ceiling is (and its not any higher just because his height), but he hasn't defined it yet.  I'm surprised he wasn't turned into the SY guy with his size, not sure if that's his choice or the team's.  So his $SMS isn't going to be as much as a Masoli, and his upside could be higher as he is younger and less likely to suffer a career ender just due to age.  So I have no issues keeping him through camp and letting rookies try to unseat him.

Quote from: Jesse on January 28, 2025, 04:14:09 PMUnfortunately, they can't bring neg list prospects with them.

Dolegala...think he might have flamed out a few years ago, tbh.

They can't bring neg listers with them, but they can pick them up if their replacements on other teams decide to list their own prospects, and if they really like them, no doubt there are neg list trades to be had.  The key is we have 3 new sets of eyes that have seen these players, and know what they can bring.  So we literally have 4x the scouting depth we had a month ago.  And if we have a coupe regional mini camps, we could see a lot of fresh faces this TC.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 28, 2025, 04:34:25 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 28, 2025, 10:40:11 AMWell, I disagree.

We're spending more at other positions. We spent much more on two receivers in the same position group.

Their DL is the reason we've had so much trouble against Toronto the past few years. It's lost us two Grey Cups. We'd be fools to ignore that.

It's Willie's house, I don't think you can bring in another DT or DE and pay them more than they pay Willie, without upsetting the apple cart.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 28, 2025, 04:43:31 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 28, 2025, 04:34:25 PMIt's Willie's house, I don't think you can bring in another DT or DE and pay them more than they pay Willie, without upsetting the apple cart.

I don't see Jefferson as the type to personalize something like the organization opting to upgrade its DE corps and having someone else make more than him for said upgrade.

Jefferson doesn't strike me as petty or infantile.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on January 28, 2025, 05:54:30 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 28, 2025, 04:34:25 PMIt's Willie's house, I don't think you can bring in another DT or DE and pay them more than they pay Willie, without upsetting the apple cart.

Well, I don't think Walters is going to have that in mind while negotiating contracts. I think and hope Willie is more mature than that.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on January 28, 2025, 06:08:43 PM
Love to sign players: Lawler, Schoen, Dobson, Ford.

Like to sign players at the right price. JA27, Cole, BA37, Feltmate, Lofton.

Can all be replaced players: Benson, Haba, Garbutt, Fox, Noah Hallett, Taylor, Whitehead

And then there's Strev17, just didn't see enough improvement. Injury. $$. 
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 28, 2025, 08:29:48 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 28, 2025, 05:54:30 PMWell, I don't think Walters is going to have that in mind while negotiating contracts. I think and hope Willie is more mature than that.

Nothing immature about it, Willie negotiated in good faith with Walters to stay in Wpg. without listening to other offers which probably could have paid him much more. He understands how the budget is structured in Wpg. to accommodate other positions and other stars.

He rightfully believes he's still the most impactful D-lineman in the league and Wpg's biggest booster.  Walters would not likely disagree with either of those points, his marketing image across the CFL is huge.

If Walters actions countered his words, and he paid someone like Lanier more money for less effort, I'd assume he'd lose a fair bit of trust in that locker room and at the bargaining table.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on January 28, 2025, 08:46:42 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 28, 2025, 08:29:48 PMNothing immature about it, Willie negotiated in good faith with Walters to stay in Wpg. without listening to other offers which probably could have paid him much more. He understands how the budget is structured in Wpg. to accommodate other positions and other stars.

He rightfully believes he's still the most impactful D-lineman in the league and Wpg's biggest booster.  Walters would not likely disagree with either of those points, his marketing image across the CFL is huge.

If Walters actions countered his words, and he paid someone like Lanier more money for less effort, I'd assume he'd lose a fair bit of trust in that locker room and at the bargaining table.

Willie is not the highest paid DL in the league, so I'm not sure what Walters could have said that would feel like a betrayal if we end up signing a higher paid DL.

Willie has way more production than Lawler has been able to give us. Is he throwing hissy fits in the locker room because Lawler makes more than him?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 28, 2025, 08:51:20 PM
Man, some of the narratives that get recklessly thrown around this forum during the off-season are just... weird.

Almost as bad as reading The Winnipeg Sun.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on January 28, 2025, 11:25:09 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on January 28, 2025, 06:08:43 PMLove to sign players: Lawler, Schoen, Dobson, Ford.

Like to sign players at the right price. JA27, Cole, BA37, Feltmate, Lofton.

Can all be replaced players: Benson, Haba, Garbutt, Fox, Noah Hallett, Taylor, Whitehead

And then there's Strev17, just didn't see enough improvement. Injury. $$. 
agree on love
like - agree but gotta get BA37 cheap
I want Haba Garbutt and Fox back but cheap, hard pass on Whitehead and Strev
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on January 28, 2025, 11:27:51 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 28, 2025, 10:40:11 AMWell, I disagree.

We're spending more at other positions. We spent much more on two receivers in the same position group.

Their DL is the reason we've had so much trouble against Toronto the past few years. It's lost us two Grey Cups. We'd be fools to ignore that.
The DL didn't lose us two cups.  Way overstated imo.  We need to improve on the DL with a stud and some depth but to claim what you are saying is way over the top imo.  Seen on other person say the same.  The game is won and lost based on how all three phases play and how we are coached.  Last year we laid an egg in all three phases imo.  Willie played a crazy good game last cup.

I believe based on our salary cap issues, the DL is one place to save not over spend.  Doesn't mean I'm right but it's what I would do.  Spend the $ elsewhere as we have a lot of players to sign that would have a huge impact if we could keep the band together.  I think we can sign some of our existing DL talent at a reasonable cost and they would be ok if we can find a couple new faces in camp.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on January 29, 2025, 12:30:39 AM
Quote from: Blueforlife on January 28, 2025, 11:27:51 PMThe DL didn't lose us two cups.  Way overstated imo.  We need to improve on the DL with a stud and some depth but to claim what you are saying is way over the top imo.  Seen on other person say the same.  The game is won and lost based on how all three phases play and how we are coached.  Last year we laid an egg in all three phases imo.  Willie played a crazy good game last cup.

I believe based on our salary cap issues, the DL is one place to save not over spend.  Doesn't mean I'm right but it's what I would do.  Spend the $ elsewhere as we have a lot of players to sign that would have a huge impact if we could keep the band together.  I think we can sign some of our existing DL talent at a reasonable cost and they would be ok if we can find a couple new faces in camp.
in the grey cup the argos figured out our d, don't rush the throws because without the dline pressure the qb can wait til receivers come open. We need to upgrade our dline and that costs money. With the high quality dbs, we can save some money at lb. Keeping the band together is partially what has lead to our slow but inevitable decline in our performance. Looks like we are trying to address this somewhat this year though..
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TecnoGenius on January 29, 2025, 04:00:41 AM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 15, 2025, 10:13:57 PMIn any case, I guess he wants to check his market value. There may even be a team that will overpay to land a starting OL. Bombers can't control that but that doesn't mean he leaves either.

I don't think Dobson is good enough.  As someone else said, he's not Desjar or Chungh: at least not yet.  I'd put Dobson as more like Speller.

I really think this is a year we can escape without a bad FA loss on the OL.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TecnoGenius on January 29, 2025, 04:03:37 AM
Quote from: Horseman on January 21, 2025, 01:49:08 AMAndrew Harris is the Riders (spit) running backs coach...traitor!

Ugh.  That hurts.  Dude needs a good job, though, and that's a pretty good gig for him.

I may have to change my avatar until he moves on!  Can't be supporting green.

The greenie forums had/has a massive hate-on for AH33.  Like major massive.  The guy they hate more than anyone else ever.  Their heads must be exploding now!  Do they abandon their hate and make up excuses why he's a good guy now?  Or do they stick with the hate?  Time to visit the green forum!
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 29, 2025, 01:19:16 PM
Quote from: TecnoGenius on January 29, 2025, 04:03:37 AMUgh.  That hurts.  Dude needs a good job, though, and that's a pretty good gig for him.

I may have to change my avatar until he moves on!  Can't be supporting green.

The greenie forums had/has a massive hate-on for AH33.  Like major massive.  The guy they hate more than anyone else ever.  Their heads must be exploding now!  Do they abandon their hate and make up excuses why he's a good guy now?  Or do they stick with the hate?  Time to visit the green forum!

They'll struggle to pick a lane. They always do.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 29, 2025, 05:32:28 PM
If our O scores more points, the DL doesn't need to dominate to win a cup.  Our D was fine, except for being on the field so much.  That's OK if its fast TD's taking you off the fiekd, but horrible if its 2 and outs...
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on January 29, 2025, 05:47:52 PM
Quote from: Waffler on January 28, 2025, 03:19:12 PMThe free agent QB's are slim pickings at best. Arbuckle and a 37 year old Masoli leading the rankings.
https://3downnation.com/2025/01/28/2025-cfl-free-agent-rankings-quarterbacks/

I feel like we need, and I mean NEED, a strong 2nd stringer. Not sure where that is coming from. Appears to be Zach or bust again.
Wow, can you imagine being the Grey Cup MVP and then you're a Free Agent?? I wonder what his price tag will be?? He is a proven backup who can obviously step into the big game and win it. We'd be fools not to check into this.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 29, 2025, 06:14:44 PM
Quote from: dd on January 29, 2025, 05:47:52 PMWow, can you imagine being the Grey Cup MVP and then you're a Free Agent?? I wonder what his price tag will be?? He is a proven backup who can obviously step into the big game and win it. We'd be fools not to check into this.

MVP because they won.  There were better players in the game.

Is he comfortable as a #2, or will he want a chance to start? 

Is he a starter (one game does not change a career).

Grey Cup 26/37  252yds 2TD, 2INT, 6.8yd average 36yd longest

Not an MVP game, by any means. 

No injury to Zach, or even if they'd made different personnel moves after the injury, and Willie is MVP. 

Arbuckle is serviceable.  But has proven inconsistent enough to not stick with a team as a starter.  5 team changes in 6 years does not scream starter.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on January 29, 2025, 06:30:06 PM
Back to the topic. Sunday at noon the free agency tampering window will open for 7 days. With a ton of players out there I would think this will be a very busy time for Mr. Walters. I would like to see him land either Lawler or Schoen, and Dobson before that window opens. 
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 29, 2025, 07:31:55 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on January 29, 2025, 06:30:06 PMBack to the topic. Sunday at noon the free agency tampering window will open for 7 days. With a ton of players out there I would think this will be a very busy time for Mr. Walters. I would like to see him land either Lawler or Schoen, and Dobson before that window opens. 

I take it Walters is going to let Schoen and Lawler test the open market to see where their price lands, won't know till it happens whether he will match offers on one, both, or neither. I think it unlikely any receiver is going to receive $250k+ offers this FA, a price correction likely in effect.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 29, 2025, 07:39:41 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 29, 2025, 06:14:44 PMMVP because they won.  There were better players in the game.

Is he comfortable as a #2, or will he want a chance to start? 

Is he a starter (one game does not change a career).

Grey Cup 26/37  252yds 2TD, 2INT, 6.8yd average 36yd longest

Not an MVP game, by any means. 

No injury to Zach, or even if they'd made different personnel moves after the injury, and Willie is MVP. 

Arbuckle is serviceable.  But has proven inconsistent enough to not stick with a team as a starter.  5 team changes in 6 years does not scream starter.

Don't think anyone is offering or expecting Arbuckle to land a #1 job, including himself.  He looks to be a competent #2, capable of winning 50% of games coming off the bench. Maybe that's all the Bombers need this season behind Zach? The future lies with Wilson....or some other unknown.

I had no idea Arbuckle was considered a very smart QB until Dinwiddie spoke prior to the GC last year, his problem has always been trying to do too much with limited physical tools.  Enroll him in the LaPo school of ball control.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 29, 2025, 07:49:38 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 29, 2025, 07:39:41 PMDon't think anyone is offering or expecting Arbuckle to land a #1 job, including himself.  He looks to be a competent #2, capable of winning 50% of games coming off the bench. Maybe that's all the Bombers need this season behind Zach? The future lies with Wilson....or some other unknown.

I had no idea Arbuckle was considered a very smart QB until Dinwiddie spoke prior to the GC last year, his problem has always been trying to do too much with limited physical tools.  Enroll him in the LaPo school of ball control.

So, if its a question of Streveler, Arbuckle or Dolegala as a backup for Zach, with Wilson in development, I guess Arbuckle wouldn't be a bad option, depending the price.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 29, 2025, 07:50:18 PM
It's probable that some of the potential free agents in Winnipeg are not in their plans.

So why didn't they release them earlier to allow those players longer to seek other opportunities? They did that with Bighill and Woli a little early but why not for some of the others?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on January 29, 2025, 08:15:42 PM
Quote from: Blueforlife on January 28, 2025, 11:27:51 PMThe DL didn't lose us two cups.  Way overstated imo.  We need to improve on the DL with a stud and some depth but to claim what you are saying is way over the top imo.  Seen on other person say the same.  The game is won and lost based on how all three phases play and how we are coached.  Last year we laid an egg in all three phases imo.  Willie played a crazy good game last cup.

I believe based on our salary cap issues, the DL is one place to save not over spend.  Doesn't mean I'm right but it's what I would do.  Spend the $ elsewhere as we have a lot of players to sign that would have a huge impact if we could keep the band together.  I think we can sign some of our existing DL talent at a reasonable cost and they would be ok if we can find a couple new faces in camp.

1. I didn't say that the DL was responsible for losing us the game. I said that the dominance of Toronto's DL is a major reason we've had so much trouble with them over the years.

2. Our salary cap management is changing. We've moved on from previous faces of our franchise. Our OL is a little less effective. Zach is a little less effective. We need to adapt in other areas. Toronto and Montreal have presented us with a blueprint to copy: invest in the DL.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on January 29, 2025, 08:18:35 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on January 29, 2025, 06:30:06 PMBack to the topic. Sunday at noon the free agency tampering window will open for 7 days. With a ton of players out there I would think this will be a very busy time for Mr. Walters. I would like to see him land either Lawler or Schoen, and Dobson before that window opens. 

I'd imagine he will have limited offers to both Schoen and Lawler and then shift his focus to one or the other as the market dictates. Still may see both retained.

If Schoen doesn't miss last season, I sign him first without thinking twice. But the question on whether he comes back the same guy throws a wrench into the decision making process.

I think Dobson prices himself out of our budget. He's not a guy I would write a blank cheque for.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 29, 2025, 08:38:38 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 29, 2025, 07:49:38 PMSo, if its a question of Streveler, Arbuckle or Dolegala as a backup for Zach, with Wilson in development, I guess Arbuckle wouldn't be a bad option, depending the price.

Shiltz and Cameron Duke also available, so the Bombers have a multitude of options they could investigate.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 29, 2025, 08:41:48 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 29, 2025, 08:38:38 PMShiltz and Cameron Judge also available, so the Bombers have a multitude of options they could investigate.

Judge is a LB. Why did you list him in the convo about QB's.

Regardless, the ultimate question is about whether we're looking for a better # 2 or a SY QB. Obviously a " better " # 2 wouldn't hurt but how much more does it cost us and how much better is he that who we have?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on January 29, 2025, 08:54:42 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 29, 2025, 08:41:48 PMJudge is a LB. Why did you list him in the convo about QB's.

Regardless, the ultimate question is about whether we're looking for a better # 2 or a SY QB. Obviously a " better " # 2 wouldn't hurt but how much more does it cost us and how much better is he that who we have?

I think he's talking about Cameron Dukes.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 29, 2025, 09:33:38 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on January 29, 2025, 08:54:42 PMI think he's talking about Cameron Dukes.

Ah, that would make sense.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 29, 2025, 10:07:22 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 29, 2025, 07:50:18 PMIt's probable that some of the potential free agents in Winnipeg are not in their plans.

So why didn't they release them earlier to allow those players longer to seek other opportunities? They did that with Bighill and Woli a little early but why not for some of the others?

Guessing that if a player asked, they'd probably say sure. 

But why telegraph to everyone what you are looking for, and giving those you don't release a bargaining chip knowing that the club Wants them back.  FA period comes soon enough.

And, there may be players you aren't interested in resigning today, at the current ask price, but might be after FA starts, and your other options you were looking at have signed elsewhere, and the asking price for your player has dropped.

There is no advantage to the team to release anyone early.  Woli had a roster bonus due, and Biggie, well, he is still on the roster until FA starts.  I'm sure they'd grant his release if he found a new contract somewhere, but officially, he's a Bomber for a couple weeks.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 29, 2025, 10:10:54 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 29, 2025, 08:41:48 PMJudge is a LB. Why did you list him in the convo about QB's.

Regardless, the ultimate question is about whether we're looking for a better # 2 or a SY QB. Obviously a " better " # 2 wouldn't hurt but how much more does it cost us and how much better is he that who we have?

Wilson is a development QB, but is he the #2 as well?  Or does he drop to #3 if we bring in a Dukes or Arbuckle?

I'd like to see us move away from SY QB, and see if Chris-Ike fits the job better, or even Clercius.  Then we can have 3 QB's on the roster ready to win a game.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 29, 2025, 10:44:49 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 29, 2025, 10:10:54 PMWilson is a development QB, but is he the #2 as well?  Or does he drop to #3 if we bring in a Dukes or Arbuckle?

I'd like to see us move away from SY QB, and see if Chris-Ike fits the job better, or even Clercius.  Then we can have 3 QB's on the roster ready to win a game.

They could even bring Prukop back for SY and go with the same setup they had with Dru Brown.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 29, 2025, 11:15:42 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 29, 2025, 10:07:22 PMGuessing that if a player asked, they'd probably say sure. 

But why telegraph to everyone what you are looking for, and giving those you don't release a bargaining chip knowing that the club Wants them back.  FA period comes soon enough.

And, there may be players you aren't interested in resigning today, at the current ask price, but might be after FA starts, and your other options you were looking at have signed elsewhere, and the asking price for your player has dropped.

There is no advantage to the team to release anyone early.  Woli had a roster bonus due, and Biggie, well, he is still on the roster until FA starts.  I'm sure they'd grant his release if he found a new contract somewhere, but officially, he's a Bomber for a couple weeks.

Every team will have players they have zero intent in bringing back in 2025. Those players were not free to consider seeing what other teams might have interest in them before free agency.

Not every early release has anything to do with a bonus payment coming due. Many bonus payments are made as scheduled.

Do you seriously think Woli was released just because of a $12K bonus due this weekend?

I'd say there is no disadvantage to releasing some players if a team has decided not to bring them back.

For those the team does want back, there is no guarantee the team re-signs them for a higher amount later. They may test free agency tampering period. Money on the table today isn't automatically on the table on Feb 12.

IMO organizations makes offers to players they want back so there aren't any secrets. That player may choose to test the tampering period but that line may not change. A team may be forced to make an offer elsewhere if they don't know that player is returning.

Things happen very quickly the moment free agency begins.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 29, 2025, 11:17:52 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 29, 2025, 10:44:49 PMThey could even bring Prukop back for SY and go with the same setup they had with Dru Brown.

Hard no. Dolegala has more upside than Prukop even if he's never going to be # 2. We also don't have Dru Brown on the roster.

Wilson looks like he can handle the SY but we don't know if he can quickly progress to # 2.  Ultimately the question at # 2 is the important one. 
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 30, 2025, 01:27:54 AM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 29, 2025, 11:17:52 PMHard no. Dolegala has more upside than Prukop even if he's never going to be # 2. We also don't have Dru Brown on the roster.

Wilson looks like he can handle the SY but we don't know if he can quickly progress to # 2.  Ultimately the question at # 2 is the important one. 

You misunderstood my post, Prukop would take over short yardage duties again, just as he did when Dru Brown was #2, this time Wilson would be #2, the real backup option. Prukop is cheap, efficient at what he does and knows his role, what more could you want from a SY QB?

Dolegala can't do SY and he isn't skilled enough to become the future replacement for Zach that fans will demand, so not sure why he's still here. I hope they send him down the highway at the very first opportunity on a high speed bus.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on January 30, 2025, 02:23:17 AM
Quote from: Jesse on January 29, 2025, 08:15:42 PM1. I didn't say that the DL was responsible for losing us the game. I said that the dominance of Toronto's DL is a major reason we've had so much trouble with them over the years.

2. Our salary cap management is changing. We've moved on from previous faces of our franchise. Our OL is a little less effective. Zach is a little less effective. We need to adapt in other areas. Toronto and Montreal have presented us with a blueprint to copy: invest in the DL.
I stand corrected but disagree that the Toronto DL is the reason we lost those cups.  I think we can continue to develop our DL and find some studs in camp.

Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 30, 2025, 01:27:54 AMYou misunderstood my post, Prukop would take over short yardage duties again, just as he did when Dru Brown was #2, this time Wilson would be #2, the real backup option. Prukop is cheap, efficient at what he does and knows his role, what more could you want from a SY QB?

Dolegala can't do SY and he isn't skilled enough to become the future replacement for Zach that fans will demand, so not sure why he's still here. I hope they send him down the highway at the very first opportunity on a high speed bus.
Disagree all but yes Wilson at #2 is ok imo
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 30, 2025, 12:48:20 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 30, 2025, 01:27:54 AMYou misunderstood my post, Prukop would take over short yardage duties again, just as he did when Dru Brown was #2, this time Wilson would be #2, the real backup option. Prukop is cheap, efficient at what he does and knows his role, what more could you want from a SY QB?

Dolegala can't do SY and he isn't skilled enough to become the future replacement for Zach that fans will demand, so not sure why he's still here. I hope they send him down the highway at the very first opportunity on a high speed bus.

Wilson might be the next Dru Brown or the 1st QB out of town. I have no idea to make any real assessment. I hope he's the next Dru Brown.

Dolegala has more experience but I'm not convinced he'll have a long CFL career.

If the team feels Wilson will be the # 2 QB then I would consider replacing Dolegala as the SY QB.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on January 30, 2025, 03:44:03 PM
14 days since we signed one of our pending FAs. 3 days left till the communication window opens. 
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: ModAdmin on January 30, 2025, 04:14:35 PM
Blue Bombers transactions - January 30, 2025

WINNIPEG, MB., January 30, 2025 – The Winnipeg Blue Bombers today announce the club has transferred American quarterback Darren Grainger to the retired list.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 30, 2025, 05:15:10 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on January 30, 2025, 03:44:03 PM14 days since we signed one of our pending FAs. 3 days left till the communication window opens. 

It seems they're taking a wait and see approach to a lot of their FA's which is a pretty passive approach, they're rolling the dice by setting them free and seeing if they come back home again. Could be the players initiative to test the market on mass?


ALEXANDER Brandon   A   DB   Central Florida   
AUGUSTINE Johnny   N   RB   Guelph   
BENSON Mike   N   LS   Acadia   
BIGHILL Adam   A   LB   Central Washington   
COLE II Brian   A   LB   Mississippi State   
DOBSON Liam   N   OL   Maine   
FELTMATE Bailey   N   LB   Acadia   
FORD Tyrell   N   DB   Waterloo   
FOX Miles   A   DL   Wake Forest   
GARBUTT TyJuan   A   DL   Virginia Tech   
HABA Celestin   A   DL   Texas A&M Commerce   
HALLETT Noah   N   DB   McMaster   
LAWLER Kenny   A   WR   California   
LOFTON Eric   A   OL   Temple   
SCHOEN Dalton   A   WR   Kansas State   
STREVELER Chris   A   QB   South Dakota   
TAYLOR Nicholas   A   DB   Florida International   
WHITEHEAD Lucky   A   WR   Florida Atlantic   
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on January 30, 2025, 05:53:55 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 30, 2025, 05:15:10 PMIt seems they're taking a wait and see approach to a lot of their FA's which is a pretty passive approach, they're rolling the dice by setting them free and seeing if they come back home again. Could be the players initiative to test the market on mass?


ALEXANDER Brandon   A   DB   Central Florida   
AUGUSTINE Johnny   N   RB   Guelph   
BENSON Mike   N   LS   Acadia   
BIGHILL Adam   A   LB   Central Washington   
COLE II Brian   A   LB   Mississippi State   
DOBSON Liam   N   OL   Maine   
FELTMATE Bailey   N   LB   Acadia   
FORD Tyrell   N   DB   Waterloo   
FOX Miles   A   DL   Wake Forest   
GARBUTT TyJuan   A   DL   Virginia Tech   
HABA Celestin   A   DL   Texas A&M Commerce   
HALLETT Noah   N   DB   McMaster   
LAWLER Kenny   A   WR   California   
LOFTON Eric   A   OL   Temple   
SCHOEN Dalton   A   WR   Kansas State   
STREVELER Chris   A   QB   South Dakota   
TAYLOR Nicholas   A   DB   Florida International   
WHITEHEAD Lucky   A   WR   Florida Atlantic   


Well Bighill is gone. I don't see Benson, Whitehead, Taylor, back. Fox, Haba, and Garbutt can all be replaced. Noah Hallett injured far to much.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on January 30, 2025, 06:23:02 PM
In terms of the big names, I think Dobson and Ford will price themselves out of our budget.

I still think we're trying to keep both Lawler and Schoen, but may have to pick one.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on January 30, 2025, 06:31:37 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 30, 2025, 06:23:02 PMIn terms of the big names, I think Dobson and Ford will price themselves out of our budget.

I still think we're trying to keep both Lawler and Schoen, but may have to pick one.

I agree, and not much in the draft this year as far as top rated OL. Erik Andersen 6'6" 307, looks like a guy that could be around at #7. But, we could have Vlahogiannis and Kalra coming back to there second TC.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on January 30, 2025, 06:43:40 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on January 30, 2025, 06:31:37 PMI agree, and not much in the draft this year as far as top rated OL. Erik Andersen 6'6" 307, looks like a guy that could be around at #7. But, we could have Vlahogiannis and Kalra coming back to there second TC.

And I doubt a draft pick would slide right into the starting role anyway. We'd plug in Wallace or Randolph.

But definitely need an eye on the future, too.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: markf on January 30, 2025, 06:49:33 PM
Lawler games played

19. 15
21. 13
22. 12
23. 12
24. 10

Five seasons, 62 games.

I wonder about Dalton. He takes such a pounding. How many games will he be able to play?

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: VictorRomano on January 30, 2025, 07:04:25 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 30, 2025, 06:43:40 PMAnd I doubt a draft pick would slide right into the starting role anyway. We'd plug in Wallace or Randolph.

I am a fan of both of these guys.  Our offence really started to roll around week 6 or 7 last year when these guys made it onto the AR IIRC.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 30, 2025, 07:05:37 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on January 30, 2025, 05:53:55 PMWell Bighill is gone. I don't see Benson, Whitehead, Taylor, back. Fox, Haba, and Garbutt can all be replaced. Noah Hallett injured far to much.

I'd be nervous if they had to replace all 3 of these guys from scratch, Bombers have not been great finding first year D-line players that can contribute right away in recent times.  Expecting them to lose 1 of the 3.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on January 30, 2025, 07:06:03 PM
Quote from: VictorRomano on January 30, 2025, 07:04:25 PMI am a fan of both of these guys.  Our offence really started to roll around week 6 or 7 last year when these guys made it onto the AR IIRC.

And, to be fair, Dobson cleaned up his act, and we starting seeing some consistency in our receiver group.

Hopefully we don't start off the season next year by falling flat on our faces again.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on January 30, 2025, 07:06:55 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 30, 2025, 07:05:37 PMI'd be nervous if they had to replace all 3 of these guys from scratch, Bombers have not been great finding first year D-line players that can contribute in recent times.  Expecting them to lose 1 of the 3.

Garbutt's the only one I would hope to get back, but I hope we're adding external pieces along the DL too.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: VictorRomano on January 30, 2025, 07:11:43 PM
Quote from: markf on January 30, 2025, 06:49:33 PMLawler games played

23. 12
24. 10

Five seasons, 62 games.

I wonder about Dalton. He takes such a pounding. How many games will he be able to play?

Keep in mind that 5 or 6 (I think) of the games Lawler missed at the beginning of 2023 were due to his suspension and work visa issues, and had nothing to do with injury.  He didn't even see the field until Game 7 vs Edmonton.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on January 30, 2025, 07:22:27 PM
Quote from: VictorRomano on January 30, 2025, 07:11:43 PMKeep in mind that 5 or 6 (I think) of the games Lawler missed at the beginning of 2023 were due to his suspension and work visa issues, and had nothing to do with injury.  He didn't even see the field until Game 7 vs Edmonton.

The point is that it's always something. Every year.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 30, 2025, 07:31:55 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 30, 2025, 07:22:27 PMThe point is that it's always something. Every year.

But then he plays and balls out like a madman more often than not.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on January 30, 2025, 09:28:59 PM
Quote from: VictorRomano on January 30, 2025, 07:11:43 PMKeep in mind that 5 or 6 (I think) of the games Lawler missed at the beginning of 2023 were due to his suspension and work visa issues, and had nothing to do with injury.  He didn't even see the field until Game 7 vs Edmonton.
Another factor is how  Collaros uses him. It seemed like he was being thrown too whenever Zac felt he didn't have another legitimate target (or even when he did). As a result the high number of contested catches puts him into more positions where he is very vulnerable
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on January 30, 2025, 09:55:36 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 30, 2025, 07:22:27 PMThe point is that it's always something. Every year.
Worth every penny, every year.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on January 30, 2025, 10:21:41 PM
https://www.bluebombers.com/2025/01/30/blue-bombers-agree-to-terms-with-linebacker-jonathan-jones/

I don't know the names but sounds good to me!
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on January 30, 2025, 10:53:37 PM
Quote from: Blueforlife on January 30, 2025, 09:55:36 PMWorth every penny, every year.

I'm a huge Bomber fan and I love Kenny.

It's not possible to be give full value for your contract as the highest paid receiver in the league when you miss huge chunks of the season.

We would all love him to play 18 and be a league leading receiver. He has not done that yet.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on January 30, 2025, 11:11:13 PM
Quote from: Jesse on January 30, 2025, 10:53:37 PMI'm a huge Bomber fan and I love Kenny.

It's not possible to be give full value for your contract as the highest paid receiver in the league when you miss huge chunks of the season.

We would all love him to play 18 and be a league leading receiver. He has not done that yet.
We can sign him at a price that will make it well worth it as long as he plays 3/4 games and playoffs.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: markf on January 31, 2025, 12:21:28 AM
B.C. Released Alexander Hollins so maybe/probably one of our receivers goes with Buck/Rourke.

If you think Rourke will rebound, might be interesting.

Hope we do not end up with Hollins.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 31, 2025, 02:40:37 AM
Quote from: markf on January 31, 2025, 12:21:28 AMB.C. Released Alexander Hollins so maybe/probably one of our receivers goes with Buck/Rourke.

If you think Rourke will rebound, might be interesting.

Hope we do not end up with Hollins.

BC currently has aprox. 16 receivers on their roster that will be competing for spots in TC, Hollins is one of the higher salaries they wanted to dump.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on January 31, 2025, 03:38:32 AM
There's nothing wrong with Hollins as a reciever, but its the price. Hopefully being released, his price tag comes down, but I certainly wouldn't be opposed to having him here.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on January 31, 2025, 01:03:57 PM
The SMS reckoning has come for import receivers this off-season for sure. None of the free agents are going to be making what they did last year. The only question is how much it falls and who blinks first.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 31, 2025, 01:20:03 PM
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on January 31, 2025, 01:03:57 PMThe SMS reckoning has come for import receivers this off-season for sure. None of the free agents are going to be making what they did last year. The only question is how much it falls and who blinks first.

Market reset which adds an interesting wrinkle to free agency.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on January 31, 2025, 02:37:58 PM
Quote from: markf on January 31, 2025, 12:21:28 AMB.C. Released Alexander Hollins so maybe/probably one of our receivers goes with Buck/Rourke.

If you think Rourke will rebound, might be interesting.

Hope we do not end up with Hollins.
Likely they released hollins to be able to afford Mcinnis.With Hatcher,Cottoy already being paid big bucks, its unlikely they go after another (unless they get rid of someone else)

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 31, 2025, 03:42:19 PM
The thing about Lawler missing games is that he gave us production when it counted, and didn't cost us $SMS when it didn't.  Yes, he has a high salary, but the actual $SMS we paid was much less.  You could almost sign him now for the same amount, and it would be paid for by the time he missed the last two seasons...
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on January 31, 2025, 03:47:08 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 31, 2025, 03:42:19 PMThe thing about Lawler missing games is that he gave us production when it counted, and didn't cost us $SMS when it didn't.  Yes, he has a high salary, but the actual $SMS we paid was much less.  You could almost sign him now for the same amount, and it would be paid for by the time he missed the last two seasons...

He absolutely cost us in the broader picture because who did we bring in when he got hurt? Keric Wheatfall? That's an opportunity cost which could (and you could argue, should) have been spent elsewhere. His injury was essentially priced into the cap and if you don't believe me the proof is that we spent right to it. He needs to play football games especially at that salary.  Big contracts in February is absolutely money we can't spend elsewhere during the season if he's hurt. At least it certainly doesn't maximize the impact of the dollars because there's no one significant left to sign. If there was a Lawler carbon copy we signed for the same amount per game and brought in when he was hurt your argument makes sense. Since that's not how it works it absolutely matters he didn't play.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 31, 2025, 03:51:50 PM
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on January 31, 2025, 03:47:08 PMHe absolutely cost us in the broader picture because who did we bring in when he got hurt? Keric Wheatfall? That's an opportunity cost which could (and you could argue, should) have been spent elsewhere. His injury was essentially priced into the cap and if you don't believe me the proof is that we spent right to it. He needs to play football games especially at that salary.  Big contracts in February is absolutely money we can't spend elsewhere during the season if he's hurt. At least it certainly doesn't maximize the impact of the dollars because there's no one significant left to sign.

$SMS saved due to injury/suspension does factor in, in signing players for the next season.  Yes, it is budgeted for at signing, and yes, it does limit who you can sign, but its not like he spent any time on the 1 game costing $SMS for no return.  And the games he did play were important games.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on January 31, 2025, 04:00:25 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 31, 2025, 03:51:50 PM$SMS saved due to injury/suspension does factor in, in signing players for the next season.  Yes, it is budgeted for at signing, and yes, it does limit who you can sign, but its not like he spent any time on the 1 game costing $SMS for no return.  And the games he did play were important games.

Agreed! I like Lawler! And I want him back over Schoen which for me is a skillset thing. However, if he is signed for big money and he ends up missing a lot of games it is not a good deal for us any way you slice it. Yes, Walters can minimize the damage somewhat but trying to use the money as best he can, but the truth is he's trying to choose the least bad options because there aren't any good ones when big money guys get hurt in August.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 31, 2025, 04:08:45 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 31, 2025, 03:51:50 PM$SMS saved due to injury/suspension does factor in, in signing players for the next season.  Yes, it is budgeted for at signing, and yes, it does limit who you can sign, but its not like he spent any time on the 1 game costing $SMS for no return.  And the games he did play were important games.

Don't know what to make of this, you're the guy that uses the same rational to justify not re-signing Jeffcoat, who always came to play when the chips were down.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 31, 2025, 04:21:43 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 31, 2025, 04:08:45 PMDon't know what to make of this, you're the guy that uses the same rational to justify not re-signing Jeffcoat, who always came to play when the chips were down.

The games missed by Jeffcoat and Lawler were completely different.  And I said that if we could sign Jeffcoat to play the last few games of the season and playoffs, it would be awesome.  But that wasn't happening. 

Had we signed him last year, there was no guarantee he'd be around for the playoffs, and any games he played during the year would have been opportunities missed for "the next guy"

As it turns out, "the next guy" didn't materialize, and many of the contenders spent time on IR.  You rolls the dice and takes your chances.

My point in this thread was that Lawler's missed games aren't an bug, but a feature.  We benefited from his skill, and saved $SMS when he was not available. 

I think it will be tough to get Schoen and Lawler back.  Love both, but if I had to choose, Lawler squeaks out my pick.  Schoen is a great scramble outlet for Zach, which becomes even more important with Woli gone.  But Lawler makes catches that change the game, tilt the field.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on January 31, 2025, 04:27:54 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 31, 2025, 04:21:43 PMThe games missed by Jeffcoat and Lawler were completely different.

How so?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 31, 2025, 04:47:40 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on January 31, 2025, 04:27:54 PMHow so?


Lawler missed games all had $SMS savings, and were more or less known and able to be planned for.

Jeffcoat's missed games, IIRC, were mostly 1 game, so cost us $SMS, and were game time decisions, hard to make adjustments for.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on January 31, 2025, 05:31:02 PM
It isn't looking like we're going to re-sign any of our potential free agents until the tampering window opens.

For several players I can understand why this is happening. For others, less so. It's been an interesting pre free agency period where we've signed some good players released by other teams.

While we don't know if the team wanted some of our specific players back or whether they declined our offers to test free agency.

Perhaps some should take note that there is always a Plan B.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 31, 2025, 05:49:45 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on January 31, 2025, 05:31:02 PMIt isn't looking like we're going to re-sign any of our potential free agents until the tampering window opens.

For several players I can understand why this is happening. For others, less so. It's been an interesting pre free agency period where we've signed some good players released by other teams.

While we don't know if the team wanted some of our specific players back or whether they declined our offers to test free agency.

Perhaps some should take note that there is always a Plan B.

I think the whiteboards at PAS have plans B through H on them

Landing a top FA Rec and DE before the tampering window is huge, we are having one of the best offseasons in the CFL this year.

We've moved on from Biggie and Woli, sure, but we haven't had to release/renegotiate top players the way some team have so far.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 31, 2025, 07:14:05 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 31, 2025, 05:49:45 PMI think the whiteboards at PAS have plans B through H on them

Landing a top FA Rec and DE before the tampering window is huge, we are having one of the best offseasons in the CFL this year.

We've moved on from Biggie and Woli, sure, but we haven't had to release/renegotiate top players the way some team have so far.

I suspect they intend to bring B.A. back, reasonable to conclude if they were not interested in doing so they would have extended him the courtesy of setting him free early like they did Bighill and Woli.  As an esteemed vet. leader this may be a way to bring him back in a secondary role, ie. not starting, more coaching.  At his age pretty certain no other team will be interested.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on January 31, 2025, 07:36:52 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on January 31, 2025, 07:14:05 PMI suspect they intend to bring B.A. back, reasonable to conclude if they were not interested in doing so they would have extended him the courtesy of setting him free early like they did Bighill and Woli.  As an esteemed vet. leader this may be a way to bring him back in a secondary role, ie. not starting, more coaching.  At his age pretty certain no other team will be interested.

Wolitarsky is the only Bomber released, because he wan not a FA and had a roster payment due.

No free agent has had the "courtesy" of a release.  Other than Biggie, we don't know how many pending FA's have been told they will not be offered a contract.  And we don't know if any have asked for a release either. 

Biggie was told he could shop for a deal, but by the rules, he can't, until they release him.  Which doesn't make sense if he wants to play in 2025. You think he'd ask for the release, and make a deal pre-FA.

We have no idea if BA has been offered a deal, or has not.  I can see many players on the list that may have got "qualifying offers" with an invitation to explore the tampering period and then counter or accept the offer.  Those qualifying offers probably expire once tampering opens, because we might find someone we want at a price we love during tampering, and that might eliminate the need for that player.

There are also some that may have been told, like Biggie, that they won't be getting an offer.  I'm sure that if they wanted to be released, Walters would cut them free.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on January 31, 2025, 11:33:18 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on January 31, 2025, 04:47:40 PMLawler missed games all had $SMS savings, and were more or less known and able to be planned for.

Jeffcoat's missed games, IIRC, were mostly 1 game, so cost us $SMS, and were game time decisions, hard to make adjustments for.



Lawler's contract had a $150k signing bonus. The SMS savings were incredible minimal.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: J5V on February 01, 2025, 12:07:19 AM
What really stings is the Argos signing Janarion Grant, again. I still struggle to think he isn't a Bomber.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on February 01, 2025, 12:19:13 AM
Quote from: J5V on February 01, 2025, 12:07:19 AMWhat really stings is the Argos signing Janarion Grant, again. I still struggle to think he isn't a Bomber.
Ya, they didn't seem to have any problem getting something worked out with him, yet we couldn't get him to return a phone call...something happened there and we'll never know what the real reason was why he blew us off.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: J5V on February 01, 2025, 12:28:18 AM
Winnipeg isn't Toronto, never will be. That being said, seeing Grant go to and stay in Toronto puzzles me. Oh well, c'est la vie. What the Bombers have to attract players is their culture and that starts with Wade Miller, Kyle Walters, and Mike O'Shea. We might not have the most talented athlete at every position. What we always do seem to have is a very good team. I'm always going to prefer that over assembling the best group of free agents.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on February 01, 2025, 02:48:00 AM
Quote from: J5V on February 01, 2025, 12:28:18 AMWinnipeg isn't Toronto, never will be. That being said, seeing Grant go to and stay in Toronto puzzles me. Oh well, c'est la vie. What the Bombers have to attract players is their culture and that starts with Wade Miller, Kyle Walters, and Mike O'Shea. We might not have the most talented athlete at every position. What we always do seem to have is a very good team. I'm always going to prefer that over assembling the best group of free agents.
Agreed. His not returning our calls speaks poorly of his character not ours.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on February 01, 2025, 02:24:42 PM
The rubber will be hitting the road tomorrow as potential free agents field offers from around the CFL.

Dobson, Schoen, Lawler and Ford are in that group. I'm not sure if any of the others will see activity. Maybe Haba, Fox or Garbutt but those are longer shots IMO.

Where does that leave the other 10 or so players? In particular will we see Alexander and Augustine returning? I expect 8 - 10 on the list as not returning to Winnipeg and possibly out of the CFL all together.

In any case we'll be deciding on some in the 1st group based on what happens in the tampering period. SMS decisions will come into play significantly on both sides.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on February 01, 2025, 03:08:09 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 01, 2025, 02:24:42 PMThe rubber will be hitting the road tomorrow as potential free agents field offers from around the CFL.

Dobson, Schoen, Lawler and Ford are in that group. I'm not sure if any of the others will see activity. Maybe Haba, Fox or Garbutt but those are longer shots IMO.

Where does that leave the other 10 or so players? In particular will we see Alexander and Augustine returning? I expect 8 - 10 on the list as not returning to Winnipeg and possibly out of the CFL all together.

In any case we'll be deciding on some in the 1st group based on what happens in the tampering period. SMS decisions will come into play significantly on both sides.



Not Schoen ;)
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on February 01, 2025, 03:46:24 PM
Quote from: Jesse on February 01, 2025, 03:08:09 PMNot Schoen ;)

That's good news. It's possible that his deal was finalized awhile ago or just today. Not that it matters per se. I do wonder why players sign the day before the tampering period and choose to not explore other offers? There have already been some last minute deals around the league.

Either way I'm glad to get him back and take this to mean he's recovered from his 2024 injury.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 01, 2025, 04:05:43 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 01, 2025, 03:46:24 PMThat's good news. It's possible that his deal was finalized awhile ago or just today. Not that it matters per se. I do wonder why players sign the day before the tampering period and choose to not explore other offers? There have already been some last minute deals around the league.

Either way I'm glad to get him back and take this to mean he's recovered from his 2024 injury.

Could be strategic, announce a big signing the day before FA opens to distract from not having any big signings during the first week. It's been years since the Bombers made a big splash early in FA, more prone to pick up bargains in week 2,3 and 4.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on February 01, 2025, 04:15:34 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 01, 2025, 04:05:43 PMCould be strategic, announce a big signing the day before FA opens to distract from not having any big signings during the first week. It's been years since the Bombers made a big splash early in FA, more prone to pick up bargains in week 2,3 and 4.

Walters says we're going to be more active and we've definitely got some money to spend. I'd expect a bit more action.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on February 01, 2025, 04:32:11 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 01, 2025, 04:05:43 PMCould be strategic, announce a big signing the day before FA opens to distract from not having any big signings during the first week. It's been years since the Bombers made a big splash early in FA, more prone to pick up bargains in week 2,3 and 4.

Yes but that doesn't mean we won't make a splash in the 1st couple of hours when free agency hits. If announcements are made about tampering period offers, we'd know how things are going. I don't remember if we hear that information publicly.

However, the result of those non retractable offers means players often choose the moment free agency hits. DAY 1 is always a big one.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on February 01, 2025, 05:11:39 PM
Dobson rated #3 in the top OL going to FA. He might expecting a big pay day.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 01, 2025, 07:21:23 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on February 01, 2025, 05:11:39 PMDobson rated #3 in the top OL going to FA. He might expecting a big pay day.

LOL, I'd rate him #4 on the Bombers O-line!
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on February 01, 2025, 08:29:33 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on February 01, 2025, 05:11:39 PMDobson rated #3 in the top OL going to FA. He might expecting a big pay day.

Walters already said as much.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on February 01, 2025, 09:42:47 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 01, 2025, 07:21:23 PMLOL, I'd rate him #4 on the Bombers O-line!
Agreed. Waaay over rated and if he wants big bucks, good luck with that one, but I expect us to move on
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on February 01, 2025, 10:06:08 PM
Quote from: dd on February 01, 2025, 09:42:47 PMAgreed. Waaay over rated and if he wants big bucks, good luck with that one, but I expect us to move on

And we're going to replace him with whom?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 01, 2025, 10:36:46 PM
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on February 01, 2025, 10:06:08 PMAnd we're going to replace him with whom?

Maybe Randolph, maybe Eli, maybe that big fella...
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: VictorRomano on February 02, 2025, 12:35:41 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 01, 2025, 10:36:46 PMMaybe Randolph, maybe Eli, maybe that big fella...
By "big fella" I assume you mean Wallace?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on February 02, 2025, 01:10:02 AM
Quote from: VictorRomano on February 02, 2025, 12:35:41 AMBy "big fella" I assume you mean Wallace?

I'd have a hard time paying Dobson elite OL money when we've let seemingly better options walk before him and we have a guy like Wallace to take over if needed.

BUT, home Grey Cup, so pay whoever will take our money Walters.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on February 02, 2025, 03:05:26 AM
Quote from: dd on February 01, 2025, 09:42:47 PMAgreed. Waaay over rated and if he wants big bucks, good luck with that one, but I expect us to move on
I expect him to be signed.  After QB most important unit imo.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on February 02, 2025, 03:18:18 AM
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on February 01, 2025, 10:06:08 PMAnd we're going to replace him with whom?
Wallace, he's a monster and waaay more mobile that Dobson
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 02, 2025, 06:35:53 AM
Quote from: dd on February 02, 2025, 03:18:18 AMWallace, he's a monster and waaay more mobile that Dobson

There might be some growing pains but well worth the price if he gets the hang of OG beside Stanley. He seems physically capable of handling anything thrown at him which is an advantage over Dobson who sometimes got pushed back right into Zach's lap.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on February 02, 2025, 05:29:06 PM
Do we want Lofton back?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on February 02, 2025, 05:44:38 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on February 02, 2025, 05:29:06 PMDo we want Lofton back?
Yes at right price
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on February 02, 2025, 06:05:14 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on February 02, 2025, 05:29:06 PMDo we want Lofton back?

I don't want to start the season with a brand new OL again, that's for sure.

I wouldn't mind if Randolph beat someone out at TC, but we know that most starters are predetermined.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on February 02, 2025, 06:53:45 PM
Yes, we want Lofton back, he is serviceable.  You cannot have an all star at every position, unless 3/4's of them are new recruits on ELC's.  If he doesn't, we have Randolph, Vanterpool and about a thousand NCAA OT's that did not make the NFL, with three new sets of eyes having scouted them.

If Dobson gets a better offer, Randolph can step in if Wallace doesn't.

We are still decently deep at every Oline position, with players in the pipeline.  Eli is a great backup C and 6th man, Wallace and the other draft choices will fight to win spots. 

Oline is my least concern.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 02, 2025, 07:23:35 PM
The Elks have signed Tyrell Ford to a 2 year deal.

https://3downnation.com/2025/02/02/sources-edmonton-elks-agree-to-terms-with-canadian-db-tyrell-ford/

They also signed Als receiver Kaion Julien-Grant.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on February 02, 2025, 07:34:45 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on February 02, 2025, 06:53:45 PMYes, we want Lofton back, he is serviceable.  You cannot have an all star at every position, unless 3/4's of them are new recruits on ELC's.  If he doesn't, we have Randolph, Vanterpool and about a thousand NCAA OT's that did not make the NFL, with three new sets of eyes having scouted them.

If Dobson gets a better offer, Randolph can step in if Wallace doesn't.

We are still decently deep at every Oline position, with players in the pipeline.  Eli is a great backup C and 6th man, Wallace and the other draft choices will fight to win spots. 

Oline is my least concern.


the thing is im not sure coaches feel the same way, we were afraid to run against the argos, and Collaros looked very nervous in the pocket. Personally I think we need to upgrade at least one position on oline
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on February 02, 2025, 08:03:10 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 02, 2025, 07:23:35 PMThe Elks have signed Tyrell Ford to a 2 year deal.

Not surprised.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on February 02, 2025, 08:05:28 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on February 02, 2025, 08:03:10 PMNot surprised.

Unfortunate but yes it was expected. I wonder how much he got although I think money was only part of the issue.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Waffler on February 02, 2025, 09:10:45 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 02, 2025, 08:05:28 PMUnfortunate but yes it was expected. I wonder how much he got although I think money was only part of the issue.

Money better have been a huge part.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on February 02, 2025, 09:40:44 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 02, 2025, 07:23:35 PMThe Elks have signed Tyrell Ford to a 2 year deal.

https://3downnation.com/2025/02/02/sources-edmonton-elks-agree-to-terms-with-canadian-db-tyrell-ford/

They also signed Als receiver Kaion Julien-Grant.

Reports are 1 year, near $230k... yeah no.

Guessing it would have taken more than $230k to keep him here, but for the Elks, its worth it for marketing alone.  They will make that back easily in seats sold and jerseys.  And they aren't going to push the upper end of the $SMS with Tre not making near the normal QB salary...
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: gordo on February 02, 2025, 09:42:27 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 02, 2025, 08:05:28 PMUnfortunate but yes it was expected. I wonder how much he got although I think money was only part of the issue.
Bros before Bombers
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Waffler on February 02, 2025, 09:45:39 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on February 02, 2025, 09:40:44 PMReports are 1 year, near $230k... yeah no.

I believe it. They need to fill seats in Edm and this is nice story that might help them.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on February 02, 2025, 09:51:32 PM
Quote from: Waffler on February 02, 2025, 09:45:39 PMI believe it. They need to fill seats in Edm and this is nice story that might help them.
IF he is paid that \i bet 100k is in marketing money. cfl has to fix that
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on February 02, 2025, 10:00:19 PM
Quote from: Pete on February 02, 2025, 09:51:32 PMIF he is paid that \i bet 100k is in marketing money. cfl has to fix that

Marketing money is exactly meant for this purpose, so that a team can sign a player that will be used to promote the game in that city.

Sucks that he's a good player we "wasted" a high draft pick on that doesn't have as much value to marketing our team as he does the Elks. 
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on February 02, 2025, 10:11:02 PM
I wonder how much you have to pay to get free agents to sign on the first day? Be interesting to see what the elks spend today.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on February 02, 2025, 10:42:08 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 02, 2025, 08:05:28 PMUnfortunate but yes it was expected. I wonder how much he got although I think money was only part of the issue.

Money was 100% of the issue.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on February 02, 2025, 11:02:32 PM
Losing Ford hurts bad, could be a generational talent.  Price too high.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: J5V on February 02, 2025, 11:11:36 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 02, 2025, 07:23:35 PMThe Elks have signed Tyrell Ford to a 2 year deal.

https://3downnation.com/2025/02/02/sources-edmonton-elks-agree-to-terms-with-canadian-db-tyrell-ford/

They also signed Als receiver Kaion Julien-Grant.
Ahh ... man! How could we have not locked him up? Every season we seem to lose some of our best stars. Man that stings!
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on February 02, 2025, 11:23:35 PM
Dang, I thought this was going to happen. I said in the summer time that the brothers would like to play on the same team, I just hoped we'd sign the Qb Ford so the DB Ford would stay here!!! Oh well, we'll have to replace him with an IMP DB at corner now so it does take away some of the ratio luxury we had.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on February 02, 2025, 11:58:40 PM
Quote from: dd on February 02, 2025, 11:23:35 PMDang, I thought this was going to happen. I said in the summer time that the brothers would like to play on the same team, I just hoped we'd sign the Qb Ford so the DB Ford would stay here!!! Oh well, we'll have to replace him with an IMP DB at corner now so it does take away some of the ratio luxury we had.

Dude, he went to the highest bidder.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: J5V on February 03, 2025, 12:13:01 AM
Quote from: Jesse on February 02, 2025, 11:58:40 PMDude, he went to the highest bidder.
I suspect that being on the same team as his brother is what tipped the scales in the Elks favour. Even if the Bombers had matched the offer he likely would have left.

Sure going to miss him though, unless we find someone to take his place that's even better. Hoping that's the case.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on February 03, 2025, 12:40:01 AM
Quote from: J5V on February 03, 2025, 12:13:01 AMI suspect that being on the same team as his brother is what tipped the scales in the Elks favour. Even if the Bombers had matched the offer he likely would have left.

Sure going to miss him though, unless we find someone to take his place that's even better. Hoping that's the case.

Tipped the scales, lol.

He got paid nearly 100k more than the highest paid corner in the league last year. His brother had nothing to do with this.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: DM83 on February 03, 2025, 02:37:02 AM
The QB brother should be hard pressed to be a number two.  The guy can't read.
Lots if coaches have guys li'e that.  They tell their QB that they have the designated receiver.  If he's not open,  run.  Exciting and will make a couple plays. But it's not a long  method for success.

The DB is great.  He will get a lot of playing time.
DBs are a dime a dozen. Should not be a problem.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on February 03, 2025, 02:46:57 AM
Quote from: Jesse on February 03, 2025, 12:40:01 AMTipped the scales, lol.

He got paid nearly 100k more than the highest paid corner in the league last year. His brother had nothing to do with this.
Keep telling yourself that but you're wrong
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 03, 2025, 02:51:35 AM
Quote from: gordo on February 02, 2025, 09:42:27 PMBros before Bombers


Twins and best friends, not all that surprised.  Tyrell mentioned it last year, they've been playing together their entire lives, last few years was the first time they found themselves on different teams.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Ducky on February 03, 2025, 05:10:07 AM
Expected this but it still hurts.

Do the Bombers have a coaching staff yet?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: markf on February 03, 2025, 01:04:52 PM
West division is going to be tough for wins,

Should be a good season.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on February 03, 2025, 02:41:31 PM
Looks like TyJuan Garbutt is off to Hamilton.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Ridermania on February 03, 2025, 02:47:48 PM
Garbutt to the Cats.

https://3downnation.com/2025/02/03/hamilton-tiger-cats-agree-to-terms-with-dl-tyjuan-garbutt/
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on February 03, 2025, 02:57:09 PM
I expected most of our "lost" FA's might be heading Goviea's way... he knows who they are and how much we would offer.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on February 03, 2025, 02:58:12 PM
https://3downnation.com/2025/02/02/winnipeg-blue-bombers-agree-to-terms-with-running-back-returner-peyton-logan/
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on February 03, 2025, 03:24:10 PM
I thought we might bring Garbutt back to compete in TC. That said, we also needed to improve on the DL. I doubt he would have been willing to sit on the PR, so that factored in if he couldn't win a role on the AR.

He might have been able to win a role as a DI to start the season?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on February 03, 2025, 03:30:17 PM
Lofton coming back seems like a wise decision. I don't know he will win the starting RT role or keep it during 2025. Until some other OT shows he is a better choice, then he should be pencilled in as the starter.

It's early but we have a significant number of import OL coming for TC. Anything is possible including a change to a 3 import OL. I don't expect that but it's an option.

Hopefully Dobson re-signs a reasonable SMS.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 03, 2025, 03:44:33 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 03, 2025, 03:24:10 PMI thought we might bring Garbutt back to compete in TC. That said, we also needed to improve on the DL. I doubt he would have been willing to sit on the PR, so that factored in if he couldn't win a role on the AR.

He might have been able to win a role as a DI to start the season?

That's the danger of letting players coming off their ELC test FA instead of offering them reasonable money, I don't think Goveia offered Garbutt big money. I was hoping they would re-sign him, if they bring back Haba now because no other team wanted him, it looks like they kept the lesser of the two choices they could have made.  If they also lose Haba and Fox they'll have a lot of holes to fill on the D-line with new faces.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on February 03, 2025, 04:01:53 PM
Garbutt shakes loose with the signing of Vaughters.  A back up/rotation DE will be found in camp on an ELC.  Garbutt is definitely making more than ELC in Ham.

Haba might be the one of the two DE's Walters targeted, we will see soon enough.  I like Haba's game.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on February 03, 2025, 04:18:15 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 03, 2025, 03:44:33 PMThat's the danger of letting players coming off their ELC test FA instead of offering them reasonable money, I don't think Goveia offered Garbutt big money. I was hoping they would re-sign him, if they bring back Haba now because no other team wanted him, it looks like they kept the lesser of the two choices they could have made.  If they also lose Haba and Fox they'll have a lot of holes to fill on the D-line with new faces.

We don't know if we offered him anything or what he asked for from the Bombers. In general I would think every team makes a reasonable offer to those players if they want to retain them. Not much point in low balling someone if he's in the plans.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on February 03, 2025, 06:57:58 PM
Like to see us land a DB, Vet, like Amos.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Waffler on February 03, 2025, 07:17:32 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on February 03, 2025, 06:57:58 PMLike to see us land a DB, Vet, like Amos.

Bombers apparently talked to Reggie Stubblefield but he ended up in Hamilton.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 03, 2025, 08:05:21 PM
Quote from: Waffler on February 03, 2025, 07:17:32 PMBombers apparently talked to Reggie Stubblefield but he ended up in Hamilton.

Strange they would be shopping for DB's at all, they have a good supply in house and usually bring 10 new DB's to TC every year.  There are better places to spend moola IMO.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 03, 2025, 08:36:27 PM
Winnipeg Blue Bombers agree to terms with Manitoba product Gavin Cobb.

Good little jitterbug receiver and punt returner.

https://3downnation.com/2025/02/03/winnipeg-blue-bombers-agree-to-terms-with-manitoba-product-gavin-cobb-sources/
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Stats Junkie on February 03, 2025, 08:54:55 PM
Dan Ralph @danralphcp
And also hearing DL Celestin Haba has reached an agreement in principle with the Toronto Argonauts.
12:01 PM · Feb 3, 2025

As per SOP, 3DN banged out an article 15 minutes later and will get credit for breaking the news  >:(
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on February 03, 2025, 09:18:25 PM
 Cobb will be a nice piece to backup Demski and Clercius.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 03, 2025, 10:08:02 PM
Quote from: Stats Junkie on February 03, 2025, 08:54:55 PMDan Ralph @danralphcp
And also hearing DL Celestin Haba has reached an agreement in principle with the Toronto Argonauts.
12:01 PM · Feb 3, 2025

As per SOP, 3DN banged out an article 15 minutes later and will get credit for breaking the news  >:(


Why does this make you mad? Like them or not 3DN is the only media covering the CFL like a blanket.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on February 03, 2025, 10:33:23 PM
Quote from: Stats Junkie on February 03, 2025, 08:54:55 PMDan Ralph @danralphcp
And also hearing DL Celestin Haba has reached an agreement in principle with the Toronto Argonauts.
12:01 PM · Feb 3, 2025

As per SOP, 3DN banged out an article 15 minutes later and will get credit for breaking the news  >:(

The guy played in 10 games in 2024, had 6 tackles and 1 sack....we'll survive this loss
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: VictorRomano on February 03, 2025, 10:34:05 PM
CFL.ca's transaction page is showing the Bombers have signed DB Cam Allen (Purdue).  6'1, 195#, second in all time inerceptions for the Boilermakers.

https://purduesports.com/sports/football/roster/cam-allen/12154
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Ridermania on February 03, 2025, 10:57:21 PM
Stampeders have offered Lawler $250K, Cats also negotiating with him.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on February 03, 2025, 11:26:44 PM
Quote from: Ridermania on February 03, 2025, 10:57:21 PMStampeders have offered Lawler $250K, Cats also negotiating with him.



Hmmmm. That's less than he got in 2024. I don't know if the Bombers will be prepared to match that. At least we know where the line is drawn. Moving to Edmonton previously and it not working out may sway his decision. He has chemistry in Winnipeg with Collaros.

Does he want to move the the teams that finished dead last in each conference in 2024?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on February 03, 2025, 11:34:21 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 03, 2025, 11:26:44 PMHmmmm. That's less than he got in 2024. I don't know if the Bombers will be prepared to match that. At least we know where the line is drawn. Moving to Edmonton previously and it not working out may sway his decision. He has chemistry in Winnipeg with Collaros.

Does he want to move the the teams that finished dead last in each conference in 2024?

I feel like Lawler's ego is going to get in the way here. He thinks he's the best WR in the league and may balk if we're offering less than the new ceiling.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on February 03, 2025, 11:40:59 PM
Quote from: Jesse on February 03, 2025, 11:34:21 PMI feel like Lawler's ego is going to get in the way here. He thinks he's the best WR in the league and may balk if we're offering less than the new ceiling.
lots of assumptions there imo
Most players will go to the highest bidder, with the occasional deals being made for folks that want to stay put or want have a better chance at winning
I don't agree that he has an ego that gets in the way.  Highly confident yes. 
I don't think we will compete at that salary range.
I personally want him back bad but can't break the bank.
If I was him I would go where the money takes me, he is near the end and it's a short career and many sacrifices are made to get there
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on February 03, 2025, 11:42:21 PM
https://www.cfl.ca/2025/02/03/bombers-extend-american-ol-eric-lofton/
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on February 03, 2025, 11:54:06 PM
Quote from: Blueforlife on February 03, 2025, 11:40:59 PMMore assumptions than facts there imo
Most players will go to the highest bidder, with the occasional deals being made for folks that want to stay put or want have a better chance at winning
I don't agree that he has an ego.  Highly confident yes. 
I don't think we will compete at that salary range.
I personally want him back bad but can't break the bank.

What's the difference between saying he has a ego and saying he's highly confident? He has expressed that he is the best on numerous occasions and has already left once for that reason.

I wonder what our offers have been to Kenny. You would think he prefer to stay here if money is close, and even at 250, he and Schoen are coming in at significantly less than last year (though paying more to Mitchell now).

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 04, 2025, 12:28:50 AM
Quote from: Jesse on February 03, 2025, 11:54:06 PMWhat's the difference between saying he has a ego and saying he's highly confident? He has expressed that he is the best on numerous occasions and has already left once for that reason.

I wonder what our offers have been to Kenny. You would think he prefer to stay here if money is close, and even at 250, he and Schoen are coming in at significantly less than last year (though paying more to Mitchell now).

Walters hasn't spent really big on any FA yet and has already doled out a few salary cuts, it wouldn't be terribly surprised if they matched Lawler's offer as long as it remains around $250k.  I'm sure Zach would be happy.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: J5V on February 04, 2025, 12:34:07 AM
Quote from: Stats Junkie on February 03, 2025, 08:54:55 PMDan Ralph @danralphcp
And also hearing DL Celestin Haba has reached an agreement in principle with the Toronto Argonauts.
12:01 PM · Feb 3, 2025

As per SOP, 3DN banged out an article 15 minutes later and will get credit for breaking the news  >:(

Oh no! WTH!
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on February 04, 2025, 02:17:24 AM
Quote from: J5V on February 04, 2025, 12:34:07 AMOh no! WTH!

No offence to Haba, but who cares ?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on February 04, 2025, 03:21:16 AM
Quote from: Jesse on February 04, 2025, 02:17:24 AMNo offence to Haba, but who cares ?

Good rookie year. Disappointing year two. Probably more talented than Garbutt but ultimately would have been hard pressed to make the game day roster this year. Hard to say where he goes from here. Likely he crashed out but I can see a reality where he puts it together and goes on to be an effective player.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: bunker on February 04, 2025, 03:35:54 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 04, 2025, 12:28:50 AMWalters hasn't spent really big on any FA yet and has already doled out a few salary cuts, it wouldn't be terribly surprised if they matched Lawler's offer as long as it remains around $250k.  I'm sure Zach would be happy.

So word is that Lawler is not coming back (maybe signing with Hamilton). He was making ? 285,000 last year. We signed Mtichell for what, 150,000 instead. We lost Bighill at 165,000. Shoen took a 50-75,000 paycut. Where are we spending our money? Throw in losing Ford, and possibly Dobson, and many of our impact players being one year older, and its not exactly been an inspiring off-season so far. Hopefully, there's some good news yet to come.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on February 04, 2025, 03:51:58 AM
Quote from: Jesse on February 04, 2025, 02:17:24 AMNo offence to Haba, but who cares ?
People that liked him or seen promise in his play, people that value continuity and prefer to hold on to the players we develop.  I care and others do as well.
Quote from: Jesse on February 03, 2025, 11:54:06 PMWhat's the difference between saying he has a ego and saying he's highly confident? He has expressed that he is the best on numerous occasions and has already left once for that reason.

I wonder what our offers have been to Kenny. You would think he prefer to stay here if money is close, and even at 250, he and Schoen are coming in at significantly less than last year (though paying more to Mitchell now).
Similar concept but don't agree his ego gets in the way.  Would be interesting to know what we put on the table.  Confidence to sign a top deal without letting ego cloud ones judgement is how I assume he is approaching his offers.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: DM83 on February 04, 2025, 08:20:30 AM
Not signing Lawler would be an enormous mistake.
He makes tough catches. Everyone else benefits from the need to cover him. He allows the Offence to function. Everyone else are complimentary players. Sign him.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on February 04, 2025, 10:41:53 AM
Quote from: Blueforlife on February 04, 2025, 03:51:58 AMPeople that liked him or seen promise in his play, people that value continuity and prefer to hold on to the players we develop.  I care and others do as well.Similar concept but don't agree his ego gets in the way.  Would be interesting to know what we put on the table.  Confidence to sign a top deal without letting ego cloud ones judgement is how I assume he is approaching his offers.

More assumptions than fact imo.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on February 04, 2025, 10:50:57 AM
Quote from: bunker on February 04, 2025, 03:35:54 AMSo word is that Lawler is not coming back (maybe signing with Hamilton). He was making ? 285,000 last year. We signed Mtichell for what, 150,000 instead. We lost Bighill at 165,000. Shoen took a 50-75,000 paycut. Where are we spending our money? Throw in losing Ford, and possibly Dobson, and many of our impact players being one year older, and its not exactly been an inspiring off-season so far. Hopefully, there's some good news yet to come.

Honestly, if we're planning on paying Dobson, that'll probably eat up most of what we're saving on receivers.

A few raises to guys eats up the difference we save on Bighill.

Some of our biggest problems last year were consistency on OL: which should be better even if we lose Dobson as our back-ups are entering their 2nd years; and the lack of a return game, which we've addressed.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: DM83 on February 04, 2025, 12:16:46 PM
Do tell....who replaces Dobson?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on February 04, 2025, 01:18:31 PM
Quote from: Jesse on February 04, 2025, 10:41:53 AMMore assumptions than fact imo.
No it's my take on Haba and also based on what others have said about him over the years.  No assumptions there.  A good player that you said  who cares is gone.  Some wouldn't yes, some would.  Haba provided steady player for us for a bit and I valued his time a Bomber. 

Your take on Haba and Kenny were wrong imo.  Agree to disagree and let's move on.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on February 04, 2025, 01:32:15 PM
Quote from: DM83 on February 04, 2025, 12:16:46 PMDo tell....who replaces Dobson?

Without signing Kenny, I think we're still in on Dobson.

But we have Wallace and Randolph in the wings who are no longer rookies. Last year our depth was tested and we were dependent on rookies to fill in the gaps. This year, they're coming in with experience.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on February 04, 2025, 02:54:29 PM
Hamilton signs Lawler.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on February 04, 2025, 03:03:14 PM
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on February 04, 2025, 02:54:29 PMHamilton signs Lawler.

Ugh.

https://www.tsn.ca/hamilton-tiger-cats-signing-veteran-wr-kenny-lawler-1.2246347
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on February 04, 2025, 03:04:17 PM
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on February 04, 2025, 02:54:29 PMHamilton signs Lawler.

Well that sucks. I wonder how much they will pay him. Ok, where do we spend the money we were paying Lawler last year? This hurts more after losing O. Wilson to the NFL. maybe he ends up coming back but it may take awhile.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Waffler on February 04, 2025, 03:06:10 PM
Not surprised. No money mentioned yet.

I am one of the ones that think the Bombers should avoid over paying, tempting as it may be. It seems we are doing the opposite of what we did last year when we opened the bank for a few and to me that is good.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on February 04, 2025, 03:13:11 PM
Crappy, but now we can move on. So, who is still out there?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on February 04, 2025, 03:14:50 PM
RedBlacks WR Acklin retires: https://www.cfl.ca/2025/02/04/jaelon-acklin-announces-retirement/
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: J5V on February 04, 2025, 03:25:47 PM
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on February 04, 2025, 02:54:29 PMHamilton signs Lawler.
Darn!  :-(
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: peg_city on February 04, 2025, 03:29:20 PM
I'm wondering if we are going to put money into a back-up QB (Masolli)? Just a thought. With Bighill and Lawler coming off the books and with Shoen making less money, we have some money to spend.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on February 04, 2025, 03:30:37 PM
I think we're down to Dobson, Alexander and Augustine as players we might re-sign. Frankly I'm not sure we get any of them back, but I'm pretty sure the others won't be back.

Now is the time to act on any higher profile player we might bring to Winnipeg. Many of the best have agreed to move elsewhere. There are still some good ones but I have no idea where we might strike.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Waffler on February 04, 2025, 03:31:12 PM
I LOVED Lawler but conversely hated the play that became too common last year which was throw it to Kenny if he is covered or not. I get the logic that he would win 50/50 balls more than he wouldn't but lots of times it was just hopeless throwing into coverage. Not a knock on Lawler, just glad this lazy idea will have to change now.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on February 04, 2025, 03:31:18 PM
Quote from: peg_city on February 04, 2025, 03:29:20 PMI'm wondering if we are going to put money into a back-up QB (Masolli)? Just a thought. With Bighill and Lawler coming off the books and with Shoen making less money, we have some money to spend.

I don't think that's what we do, but we'll see.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on February 04, 2025, 03:34:24 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 04, 2025, 03:31:18 PMI don't think that's what we do, but we'll see.

I think we would look at a young QB like Dukes, first.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on February 04, 2025, 03:38:46 PM
Quote from: peg_city on February 04, 2025, 03:29:20 PMI'm wondering if we are going to put money into a back-up QB (Masolli)? Just a thought. With Bighill and Lawler coming off the books and with Shoen making less money, we have some money to spend.

Ed Tait said that's unlikely. We apparently like Dolegala and are going to be bringing in young guys for the future.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: peg_city on February 04, 2025, 03:39:04 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on February 04, 2025, 03:34:24 PMI think we would look at a young QB like Dukes, first.

Or Patterson
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: peg_city on February 04, 2025, 03:39:31 PM
Quote from: Jesse on February 04, 2025, 03:38:46 PMEd Tait said that's unlikely. We apparently like Dolegala and are going to be bringing in young guys for the future.

God help us if Collaros gets hurt.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Waffler on February 04, 2025, 03:40:49 PM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 04, 2025, 03:30:37 PMI think we're down to Dobson, Alexander and Augustine as players we might re-sign.

Not sure who else is willing to outbid us on Alexander and Augustine. Alexander (31) has injury history, Augustine (31) is a career backup/special teamer. Neither one figures to get a big pay day.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Ridermania on February 04, 2025, 03:42:08 PM
Dobson just signed with Hamilton! 
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Waffler on February 04, 2025, 03:53:44 PM
Quote from: Jesse on February 04, 2025, 03:38:46 PMEd Tait said that's unlikely. We apparently like Dolegala and are going to be bringing in young guys for the future.

If true it just makes me wonder even more why he didn't get to play in the Grey Cup. All I can think of is loyalty.

We all saw the Grey Cup. When Zach can't play, and he turns 37 this year, we don't have a chance. Dolegala and young guys ain't gonna get this done. 
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on February 04, 2025, 04:03:42 PM
Quote from: Waffler on February 04, 2025, 03:40:49 PMNot sure who else is willing to outbid us on Alexander and Augustine. Alexander (31) has injury history, Augustine (31) is a career backup/special teamer. Neither one figures to get a big pay day.

I know. I just meant I don't know if we've decided to move on from both or whether we re-sign them. Generally I've taken the position that we will be moving on from both. It wouldn't be the 1st time I was wrong though.

Bombers have signed a bunch of DB's early in the off season. We'll see lots of them at mini camps and some will get cut and replaced before the actual TC.

It could be that the initial idea from our DC is that Kelly may be give a long look to start at safety.

At the moment our needs our DT, receiver and possible DE.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 04, 2025, 04:44:01 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on February 04, 2025, 03:13:11 PMCrappy, but now we can move on. So, who is still out there?

They have Schoen, Demski, Clercius and Wheatfall with a fair chance Pokey returns within a couple of months. Mitchell is Lawler's cheaper replacement, I think the receiving corps is good, no great reason to spend big on a receiver now. They'll probably bring a dozen new WR into camp to compete like they usually do.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on February 04, 2025, 05:08:47 PM
Quote from: Waffler on February 04, 2025, 03:53:44 PMIf true it just makes me wonder even more why he didn't get to play in the Grey Cup. All I can think of is loyalty.

We all saw the Grey Cup. When Zach can't play, and he turns 37 this year, we don't have a chance. Dolegala and young guys ain't gonna get this done.

Old guy off the scrap heap isn't going to get it done after Zach either. You prioritize bring in the young guys so you can find they guy after Zach.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on February 04, 2025, 05:54:28 PM
Wow, Lawler and Dobson to Hamilton....Hamilton needed talent and has went out and got it!!
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: GOLDMEMBER on February 04, 2025, 06:17:42 PM
Losing Dobson sucks.
Losing Lawler does not bother me that much. He says I love this city blah blah leaves for worthless Edm comes back here blah blah I love this coach team and city then leaves for sucky Hamiton. I'm done with thy guy.
Hamilton wins the off season but how many times have we said that they Hammy falls flat on there face when the lights are on.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on February 04, 2025, 06:30:06 PM
Dobson a huge loss!
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on February 04, 2025, 06:52:11 PM
Quote from: Blueforlife on February 04, 2025, 06:30:06 PMDobson a huge loss!

Much less of a loss than Couture, Hardrick, Desjarlais or Chungh.  Dobson was good, but I think Wallace can be as good or better, just due to his size. And if not, we have the ratio to dress Randolph there.

We continue to supply teams with expensive Oline.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 04, 2025, 07:15:24 PM
Quote from: Waffler on February 04, 2025, 03:53:44 PMIf true it just makes me wonder even more why he didn't get to play in the Grey Cup. All I can think of is loyalty.

We all saw the Grey Cup. When Zach can't play, and he turns 37 this year, we don't have a chance. Dolegala and young guys ain't gonna get this done.

Yah, I can't see the reason to stick with Dolegala, watched him in Sask. and BC and didn't see any spark of talent. Honestly saw more from Cornelius, at least he could run well. As it stands Wilson is the future QB until someone else comes along, maybe Jackson will help him progress quickly if they give him a fair amount of playing time.

Here's my ghastly prediction, Zach retires after this season and the unwanted hobo Cody Fajardo slips into his empty shoes the following season. Hah!
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on February 04, 2025, 07:26:50 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on February 04, 2025, 06:52:11 PMMuch less of a loss than Couture, Hardrick, Desjarlais or Chungh.  Dobson was good, but I think Wallace can be as good or better, just due to his size. And if not, we have the ratio to dress Randolph there.

We continue to supply teams with expensive Oline.
Make the league broke on stud OL at a time! ;)
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on February 04, 2025, 07:32:10 PM
Adding Jackson does make development of the next QB a much better prospect.  I think we are going to see a lot of arms in camp.  And JJ will probably be at some sort of mini camps, we need to do that.

With all the new scouting talent, there must be some arms on the radar, might need for them to fall off other neg lists, or trade for their rights.

With Zach's impending retirement and JJ as QB coach, this has to be an attractive landing spot for a young QB.  If Dolegala finishes camp on the roster, I think we have missed the boat.  Wilson needs to progress to a solid #2 QB and SY guy, and we need 1 AR and 1 PR guy pushing him.  And those guys shouldn't be anyone whose name we know today.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on February 04, 2025, 07:44:03 PM
At the beginning of free agency I was feeling optimistic as a bomber fan. But the further we go into the week the more disillusioned I'm getting. We lose 3 allstars in Lawler, Ford and Dobson
and nothing about who's replacing them. Every year we seem to be trying to patch over these losses, but it feels like the air is escaping faster
I mean seriously we lose Ford and Lawler and sign Haggerty and Cobbs? Wade needs to step in
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on February 04, 2025, 07:53:12 PM
Quote from: Pete on February 04, 2025, 07:44:03 PMAt the beginning of free agency I was feeling optimistic as a bomber fan. But the further we go into the week the more disillusioned I'm getting. We lose 3 allstars in Lawler, Ford and Dobson
and nothing about who's replacing them. Every year we seem to be trying to patch over these losses, but it feels like the air is escaping faster

Lawler - Mitchell
Ford - Parker
Dobson - Wallace/Randolph

We re-signed most of our other FA's and have added Vaughters and a few other pieces (Jones, Cobb, Payton) that won't hurt at all...

Not sure the source of your pessimism, we've lost more and bigger assets in the past, and have 5 straight GC appearances to show for it.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on February 04, 2025, 07:56:23 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on February 04, 2025, 07:53:12 PMLawler - Mitchell
Ford - Parker

These aren't 1:1 replacements. And even you know that.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on February 04, 2025, 08:15:14 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on February 04, 2025, 07:53:12 PMLawler - Mitchell
Ford - Parker
Dobson - Wallace/Randolph

We re-signed most of our other FA's and have added Vaughters and a few other pieces (Jones, Cobb, Payton) that won't hurt at all...

Not sure the source of your pessimism, we've lost more and bigger assets in the past, and have 5 straight GC appearances to show for it.

every year we have regressed, as is to be expected as grey cup winning teams tend to get raided, but at some point we need to become more aggressive
as for your comparisons 
Mitchell covers off wilson maybe
and we havent even addressed what we are doing at safety. We still need help on oline as well
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on February 04, 2025, 08:22:38 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on February 04, 2025, 07:56:23 PMThese aren't 1:1 replacements. And even you know that.

Who said they were 1:1 replacements.  They are replacements.  That's who will line up in their positions.  The OP was saying "there is no mention of their replacements".  Yes there was.

Some replacements will be less talented, and some will be more talented. 

Are you concerned that we lost Haba/Garbutt and only replaced them with Vaughters? 

Or that we will lose Lucky and only replace him with Logan?

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on February 04, 2025, 08:27:55 PM
Quote from: Pete on February 04, 2025, 08:15:14 PMevery year we have regressed, as is to be expected as grey cup winning teams tend to get raided, but at some point we need to become more aggressive
as for your comparisons 
Mitchell covers off wilson maybe
and we havent even addressed what we are doing at safety. We still need help on oline as well

Someone mentioned that there are 6 potential safetys on the current roster.  Not sure that many, but there are options.

Why do we need help on the oline?  We lost one OG.  We have 2 Nats on the roster that can fill that spot (Eli/Wallace) and one Int (Randolph).  One will with the spot, and we will still have the full oline, plus 1 Nat and 1 Int backup.  Plus we have draft picks coming back, and may draft more.  Dobson was a luxury we didn't need to overpay.

The WFC with the Mafia in charge has always drafted and recruited well, so much so that, as you say, we get raided.  "Being raided" proves we can produce talent, and there is no reason to believe that will stop. or even slow.

I believe that Walters has done a great job of getting better at some spots while not losing too much at others, and has $SMS left to pick up some extra pieces.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blueandgoldguy on February 04, 2025, 08:42:54 PM
Very disappointed that the club choose not to re-sign both Lawler and Dobson who was coming into his own as the 2024 season progressed...yet the Walters (with likely a big nudge from O'Shea) saw fit to spend money on bring back an aging and mostly useless Jake Thomas who I think we can all agree is the worst interior starting lineman in the CFL.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on February 04, 2025, 08:43:24 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on February 04, 2025, 08:22:38 PMWho said they were 1:1 replacements.  They are replacements. That's who will line up in their positions.  The OP was saying "there is no mention of their replacements".  Yes there was.

You ignored @Pete mentioning the all-star part. So, I guess we interpreted what he said differently.

In any case, losing Lawler and Ford will likely be felt; you can replace the player but not the talent/pedigree/productivity.

FWIW, I'm crustier about Ford than I am about Lawler. The latter showed his hand again, so bye.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Waffler on February 04, 2025, 08:48:09 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on February 04, 2025, 08:27:55 PMI believe that Walters has done a great job of getting better at some spots while not losing too much at others, and has $SMS left to pick up some extra pieces.

Agree. Nice if we have some cap room for NFL cuts around Labor Day. Some good players come back most years. Sankey 2 years ago, Rourke last year. Bighill we got as an NFL cut in late May.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on February 04, 2025, 08:50:32 PM
Quote from: blueandgoldguy on February 04, 2025, 08:42:54 PMVery disappointed that the club choose not to re-sign both Lawler and Couture who was coming into his own as the 2024 season progressed...yet the Walters (with likely a big nudge from O'Shea) saw fit to spend money on bring back an aging and mostly useless Jake Thomas who I think we can all agree is the worst interior starting lineman in the CFL.

I am going to heartily disagree with you on Jake's viability.  He takes up double teams, he gets pressure, he makes plays and he has been the heart and soul of the D along with Biggie and Willie.  He gives 110% every play he is called upon, and has no quit in him.  As to "spending money" on him, we're not breaking the bank by any means on him.  He is a valuable rotational piece, with the right passport.

I assume by Couture, you mean Dobson.  I think Wallace has a higher ceiling, and we will quickly forget Dobson.  And the $SMS not spent on Lawler and Dobson will make a difference throughout the roster.
Quote from: Waffler on February 04, 2025, 08:48:09 PMAgree. Nice if we have some cap room for NFL cuts around Labor Day. Some good players come back most years. Sankey 2 years ago, Rourke last year. Bighill we got as an NFL cut in late May.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Ridermania on February 04, 2025, 08:54:59 PM
Feltmate just retired to pursue another career.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blueandgoldguy on February 04, 2025, 09:17:57 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on February 04, 2025, 08:43:24 PMYou ignored @Pete mentioning the all-star part. So, I guess we interpreted what he said differently.

In any case, losing Lawler and Ford will likely be felt; you can replace the player but not the talent/pedigree/productivity.

FWIW, I'm crustier about Ford than I am about Lawler. The latter showed his hand again, so bye.

Losing Ford is a tough loss given his passport, but I'm very confident the replacement (an American) will fair quite well there. Plus, Ford is being massively overpaid at 230,000.  I can't blame Walters for not matching that offer.

Our secondary is shaping up to be quite good once again...could see it being the best in the league again, depending on who they put at safety and how said person will perform there (please don't bring back Alexander!)  Perhaps Kelly will be decent and we compensate for the ratio loss of Ford with him, although not the same talent level.  One strength of this regime is consistently finding talent in the secondary.

The problem with the current regime over the past 3 or so years is finding and signing impact talent in the trenches, particularly the d-line which was the worst in the league last year.  Heck the front 7 was arguably the worst in the league last year so credit to Younger for wringing all that he did from the defense with his play-calling.  The two under-the-radar Linemen and Linebacker signings were a nice start, but the Bombers needed to find an impact interior d-lineman to increase pressure on opposing teams quarterbacks.  It sure doesn't look like they will do that through free agency so we have to hope the new scouts find a gem or two from down south.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blueandgoldguy on February 04, 2025, 09:20:08 PM
Quote from: Waffler on February 04, 2025, 08:48:09 PMAgree. Nice if we have some cap room for NFL cuts around Labor Day. Some good players come back most years. Sankey 2 years ago, Rourke last year. Bighill we got as an NFL cut in late May.

Mid-season signings from the NFL are a rarity nowadays and have been for several years.  This isn't the 90s, or even the 00s anymore.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blueandgoldguy on February 04, 2025, 09:32:18 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on February 04, 2025, 08:50:32 PMI am going to heartily disagree with you on Jake's viability.  He takes up double teams, he gets pressure, he makes plays and he has been the heart and soul of the D along with Biggie and Willie.  He gives 110% every play he is called upon, and has no quit in him.  As to "spending money" on him, we're not breaking the bank by any means on him.  He is a valuable rotational piece, with the right passport.

I assume by Couture, you mean Dobson.  I think Wallace has a higher ceiling, and we will quickly forget Dobson.  And the $SMS not spent on Lawler and Dobson will make a difference throughout the roster.

lol, what are you talking about.  Thomas does not get pressure.  He gets washed out of the play constantly.  The only reason he gets rare sacks is that the quarterback runs right in to him thanks to pressure from other players, not because he outmuscles and outmanuveours the opposing O-lineman...same thing with running backs.

Who cares if he gives 110%, he is years past his best-before date and is mostly awful.  He also took 70-80% of the snaps last year when he should be taking 20-30%, who knows why given we had more than the required amount of Canadians out there starting.

Losing Dobson really hurts as he started to develop into a competent starting guard for the team as the season played out.  I think Wallace will be good, but the concern is how long will that take?  The growing pains will certainly be there and if they last all season, that will spell trouble for an increasingly immobile Zach Collaros.  Maybe they bring back Couture to provide some Canadian depth and stability on the O-line.  The fact is, they have bled talent on the O-line for years and the O-line went from elite in 2021 to no more than average last year.  It's possible the O-line will be worse next year.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on February 04, 2025, 09:35:44 PM
Quote from: blueandgoldguy on February 04, 2025, 08:42:54 PMVery disappointed that the club choose not to re-sign both Lawler and Dobson who was coming into his own as the 2024 season progressed...yet the Walters (with likely a big nudge from O'Shea) saw fit to spend money on bring back an aging and mostly useless Jake Thomas who I think we can all agree is the worst interior starting lineman in the CFL.
Have some respect for Jake.  Better yet go to camp and give us a report in the spring.  Go on a hard workout day when it's hot and Jake is grumpy from a hard days work.  Tell him he is mostly useless and the worst starting interior DL in the league.  Report back if head is still attached.  Got a lot of guts posting that trash behind the keyboard.

Jake has been good for us for a long time.  The hate for him over the years is over the top by some.

Quote from: blueandgoldguy on February 04, 2025, 09:32:18 PMlol, what are you talking about.  Thomas does not get pressure.  He gets washed out of the play constantly.  The only reason he gets rare sacks is that the quarterback runs right in to him thanks to pressure from other players, not because he outmuscles and outmanuveours the opposing O-lineman...same thing with running backs.

Who cares if he gives 110%, he is years past his best-before date and is mostly awful.  He also took 70-80% of the snaps last year when he should be taking 20-30%, who knows why given we had more than the required amount of Canadians out there starting.

Losing Dobson really hurts as he started to develop into a competent starting guard for the team as the season played out.  I think Wallace will be good, but the concern is how long will that take?  The growing pains will certainly be there and if they last all season, that will spell trouble for an increasingly immobile Zach Collaros.  Maybe they bring back Couture to provide some Canadian depth and stability on the O-line.  The fact is, they have bled talent on the O-line for years and the O-line went from elite in 2021 to no more than average last year.  It's possible the O-line will be worse next year.
Jake gets pressures, get doubled teamed at times, is good against the run and gets some sacks and has a few fumble recoveries and strips.  You are overstating the negative on him.  Jake is at the tail end of his career is a good depth signing and can start as needed.  He is a good part of our rotation and has the right passport.  A good value, they can't all be superstars.  Glue guy.  He is not mostly awful, if he was he wouldn't have played so much last year nor would we have signed him.  He is a average to good Cdn imo.

Jake has earned his respect, you are entitled to your opinion on him but no need to get nasty.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TBURGESS on February 04, 2025, 09:41:15 PM
Winnipeg Blue Bombers
Acquired: LB Jonathan Jones (A), REC Dillon Mitchell (A), DL James Vaughters (A)
Agreed to terms: REC Gavin Cobb (N), DB Josh Hagerty (N)
Released or agreed to terms elsewhere: OL Liam Dobson (N), DB Tyrell Ford (N), DL TyJuan Garbutt (A), Celestin Haba (A), REC Kenny Lawler (A), REC Drew Wolitarsky (N)
The Blue Bombers got a headstart on free agency by scooping up three players who had been released elsewhere — Jones, Mitchell, and Vaughters, all of whom could be starters come Week 1. Cobb and Hagerty are nice Canadian depth pieces, though it's hard to overlook how much talent has left Bomberland. Lawler is arguably the league's best receiver, while Ford and Dobson are high-level Canadian starters.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 04, 2025, 09:53:55 PM
Bombers sign former Elk Natl. DB Josh Hagerty, decent size 6'3" 200 lbs. could be a candidate for Safety or just another ST head-banger.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on February 04, 2025, 10:07:31 PM
Quote from: blueandgoldguy on February 04, 2025, 09:32:18 PMlol, what are you talking about.  Thomas does not get pressure.  He gets washed out of the play constantly.  The only reason he gets rare sacks is that the quarterback runs right in to him thanks to pressure from other players, not because he outmuscles and outmanuveours the opposing O-lineman...same thing with running backs.

Who cares if he gives 110%, he is years past his best-before date and is mostly awful.  He also took 70-80% of the snaps last year when he should be taking 20-30%, who knows why given we had more than the required amount of Canadians out there starting.

Losing Dobson really hurts as he started to develop into a competent starting guard for the team as the season played out.  I think Wallace will be good, but the concern is how long will that take?  The growing pains will certainly be there and if they last all season, that will spell trouble for an increasingly immobile Zach Collaros.  Maybe they bring back Couture to provide some Canadian depth and stability on the O-line.  The fact is, they have bled talent on the O-line for years and the O-line went from elite in 2021 to no more than average last year.  It's possible the O-line will be worse next year.
Agree 100%. The support for JT is basically sentimental 'Rudy' cheer for the underdog stuff, but really, the guy at BEST is a rotational player, at very best. Has played a ton of games in the CFL, all with the Bombers, and I don't think he'd make any other club.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on February 04, 2025, 10:10:27 PM
Has anyone signed DTs:

Brinkman (TO)
Oakman (ED)
Brown (SSK)
Lanier (SSK)
Wynn (MTL)


or DE

Howsare (CGY)

Any word on Dionte Spencer's landing spot (3DN says he's coming back from NFL)
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on February 04, 2025, 10:11:24 PM
I am hoping some of the SMS money saved on Lawler is going towards getting us a premier DT, we need to get pressure from the interior of our DL and with 2 decent DE's, the OL will have to focus on shutting them down, leaving the middle to single blocking...we need someone who can get consistent pressure on the inside, we haven't had that since Sayles left.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on February 04, 2025, 10:35:34 PM
Quote from: dd on February 04, 2025, 10:07:31 PMAgree 100%. The support for JT is basically sentimental 'Rudy' cheer for the underdog stuff, but really, the guy at BEST is a rotational player, at very best. Has played a ton of games in the CFL, all with the Bombers, and I don't think he'd make any other club.
Understating his accomplishments as a decent Canadian DL imo.  In his prime he would have made other clubs.  Now not likely.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on February 04, 2025, 10:47:56 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on February 04, 2025, 10:10:27 PMHas anyone signed DTs:

Brinkman (TO)
Oakman (ED)
Brown (SSK)
Lanier (SSK)
Wynn (MTL)


or DE

Howsare (CGY)

Any word on Dionte Spencer's landing spot (3DN says he's coming back from NFL)
Brinkman and Oakman would be nice, spend of the money saved not signing Lawler on these 2 guys!! Ok, At least 1 of them!!
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: VictorRomano on February 04, 2025, 11:09:36 PM
Quote from: TBURGESS on February 04, 2025, 09:41:15 PMLawler is arguably the league's best receiver, while Ford and Dobson are high-level Canadian starters.

WHAT ** DID I JUST READ? 

Dude has broken 1000yards exactly once in 5 seasons in the league, and his 662 yards and 4TDs last year are easily replaceable.  I mean, come on, he wasn't even the best reciver on the Bombers (he was 4th, behind Wilson, Clercius, and Demski) in 2024; there's NO WAY he's the best reciever in the CFL, and that's not even arguable.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on February 04, 2025, 11:39:29 PM

Has anyone signed DTs:

Brinkman (TO) signed ...with who else -the elks
Oakman (ED)
Brown (SSK) = not a chance
Lanier (SSK)
Wynn (MTL) 


Cox is available too and micah johnson


or DE

Howsare (CGY)

Any word on Dionte Spencer's landing spot (3DN says he's coming back from NFL) -past expiry date
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 05, 2025, 12:01:40 AM
Brinkman went to the Elks along with fellow Argos Ceresna and Natl. Robbie Smith. The last two combined salary half a million bucks.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on February 05, 2025, 12:05:27 AM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 05, 2025, 12:01:40 AMBrinkman went to the Elks along with fellow Argos Ceresna and Natl. Robbie Smith. The last two combined salary half a million bucks.
Dang, Edmonton dipped heavy into FA waters!! A lot of pressure on their newly anointed Qb to deliver.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on February 05, 2025, 12:26:08 AM
Gotta laugh at Lawler getting paid as the league #1 every single year and not once being able to earn his pay check. I don't mind us moving on at all.

Ford would have been great to keep. I don't think he's worth the price tag, but right now there seems to be a bit of salary walking out the door with no one (as of yet) filling the void.

I haven't seen any numbers, but based on Walters' comments, I expected Dobson to get priced out of our comfort zone and we do have internal replacements. I'm happy enough with only making one change from last year and hopefully it still represents improvement simply based on improved continuity.

But as much as I agree with the individual moves, and can articulate some roster improvements over last year, I am still waiting to see our chips get pushed into the centre of the table a little more.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: GOLDMEMBER on February 05, 2025, 01:04:38 AM
Quote from: Jesse on February 05, 2025, 12:26:08 AMGotta laugh at Lawler getting paid as the league #1 every single year and not once being able to earn his pay check. I don't mind us moving on at all.

Ford would have been great to keep. I don't think he's worth the price tag, but right now there seems to be a bit of salary walking out the door with no one (as of yet) filling the void.

I haven't seen any numbers, but based on Walters' comments, I expected Dobson to get priced out of our comfort zone and we do have internal replacements. I'm happy enough with only making one change from last year and hopefully it still represents improvement simply based on improved continuity.

But as much as I agree with the individual moves, and can articulate some roster improvements over last year, I am still waiting to see our chips get pushed into the centre of the table a little more.
Couldn't agree more regarding Lawler. I think he will start to get more and more injury prone going forward as well.

Ford was a luxury but to pricey at DB. plus he did get burned here and there last year. Good pick artist though.

I prefer think t Walters is making g the wise decision. Back up QB is scary though. Donagalla and Wilson, hmmm so sure.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on February 05, 2025, 01:10:08 AM
I am assuming the $$ saved on Dobson and Lawler will be used to secure a decent backup Qb and a DT--there's still some available that would be an upgrade from Dolegala and the present cast we have at DT.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on February 05, 2025, 01:13:00 AM
Quote from: Blueforlife on February 04, 2025, 10:35:34 PMUnderstating his accomplishments as a decent Canadian DL imo.  In his prime he would have made other clubs.  Now not likely.

You're living in the past.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: markf on February 05, 2025, 01:20:06 AM
Quote from: blueandgoldguy on February 04, 2025, 09:17:57 PMPerhaps Kelly will be decent and we compensate

Didn't Kelly start in one game.... gave up two quick touchdowns and got benched? Looked lost on the field?

Or am I misremembering.


Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on February 05, 2025, 01:24:20 AM
Quote from: VictorRomano on February 04, 2025, 11:09:36 PMWHAT ** DID I JUST READ? 

Dude has broken 1000yards exactly once in 5 seasons in the league, and his 662 yards and 4TDs last year are easily replaceable.  I mean, come on, he wasn't even the best reciver on the Bombers (he was 4th, behind Wilson, Clercius, and Demski) in 2024; there's NO WAY he's the best reciever in the CFL, and that's not even arguable.
Lawler is the highest PAID receiver in the league, not the best receiver, in the league, and not the best bang for your buck at reciever, hence, we moved on and righfully so. He does make circus like catches which catches everbody's attention but we made the right move replacing him with 2 recievers who will give us better ball distribution and a less predictable offense.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: VictorRomano on February 05, 2025, 01:30:38 AM
Just saw on the CFL Transactions page that the Bombers signed former Atlanta Falcons DB and KR/PR Trey Vaval, out of Minnesota State.  Was signed as undrafted last spring but was waived August 25th.

https://msumavericks.com/sports/football/roster/trey-vaval/11926
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on February 05, 2025, 02:07:49 AM
Quote from: Blue In BC on February 05, 2025, 01:13:00 AMYou're living in the past.

I have commented on my opinion about Thomas and his play over his career and what I think about his game now.  Maybe contribute your opinion on the subject. 

How is going over a players career and posting ones opinion on it living in the past?, wow.

I have and always will evaluate everything CFL on here, past, present and future.

I am allowed to support Thomas and his career without getting roasted for doing so.  A good depth player, who will continue to contribute on rotation this season.  I am happy we brought him back and if you don't like the player or the signing that's fine and let's please agree to disagree.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on February 05, 2025, 02:28:44 AM
lets jus
Quote from: markf on February 05, 2025, 01:20:06 AMDidn't Kelly start in one game.... gave up two quick touchdowns and got benched? Looked lost on the field?

Or am I misremembering.



lets just say im a little nervous if Kelly is the only good option at safety
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on February 05, 2025, 02:33:12 AM
Quote from: Pete on February 05, 2025, 02:28:44 AMlets jus lets just say im a little nervous if Kelly is the only good option at safety
That makes two of us
BA >>> Kelly imo

BA isn't ideal and I would like to see a few face or two in camp to look at alternates and lets develop Kelly another year and give him reps
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on February 05, 2025, 02:45:10 AM
Experience wise maybe but Alexander was not the same player last year and the foot speed was a big issue.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: GOLDMEMBER on February 05, 2025, 03:37:41 AM
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on February 05, 2025, 02:45:10 AMExperience wise maybe but Alexander was not the same player last year and the foot speed was a big issue.
Blue need to move on from Alexander. Safety was a clear weak spot last year.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on February 05, 2025, 04:11:05 AM
Lawler at $275K. 10K less then last year.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on February 05, 2025, 10:46:22 AM
Quote from: Pigskin on February 05, 2025, 04:11:05 AMLawler at $275K. 10K less then last year.

100k more than we paid Schoen and 25k more than any other receiver in the league.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on February 05, 2025, 12:59:22 PM
Quote from: Blueforlife on February 05, 2025, 02:07:49 AMI have commented on my opinion about Thomas and his play over his career and what I think about his game now.  Maybe contribute your opinion on the subject. 

How is going over a players career and posting ones opinion on it living in the past?, wow.

I have and always will evaluate everything CFL on here, past, present and future.

I am allowed to support Thomas and his career without getting roasted for doing so.  A good depth player, who will continue to contribute on rotation this season.  I am happy we brought him back and if you don't like the player or the signing that's fine and let's please agree to disagree.

It's been covered in depth for several seasons. In the past our Canadian starters and depth were not good. At that point we had players that wouldn't have made other rosters by anything more than pure necessity achieving the roster.

Thomas fell into the bare minimum qualification as our best option. He was never fast, quick or very athletic.

It's only been the last couple of years that our overall Canadians have improved to the point where we've been able to start 8 - 10 at times.

He wasn't one of the ones that should have continued to start but it was a positional problem within our ratio on the DL and how we employed our DI's.

Sure, he was not a player that got injured and he played full effort all the time. Well liked by his teammates and fans alike. He survived partially because of O'Shea being loyal to a fault.

In 2024 most expected Lawson to start as we finally had a player deemed more than " adequate ". Injury curtailed that.

We have several recent draft picks coming to TC. Thomas may survive as depth for another season as the newbies get up to speed. He may start the season as Lawson gets his head back into the game after a long re-hab. Or he may start the season as the next best as the rotation for Canadian DT's.

I guess we'll see if age, possible SMS ( not excessive but more than ELC's ) and need to roster newer draft choices come into play. Samson, Schmekel and Kornelson all can't be retained on the PR in probability. Time marches on.




Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TBURGESS on February 05, 2025, 03:31:27 PM
Quote from: Jesse on February 05, 2025, 10:46:22 AM100k more than we paid Schoen not including bonuses and 25k more than any other receiver in the league
Fixed it for you.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on February 05, 2025, 03:57:42 PM
Keeping 4 Nat DT's on the AR wouldn't be ridiculous if we don't sign an Int DT.  We probably lose one of them if we put him on the PR (other teams do need Nat depth, not that they are starters), but there is always the IR for low $SMS "spare parts".
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on February 05, 2025, 04:31:34 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on February 05, 2025, 03:57:42 PMKeeping 4 Nat DT's on the AR wouldn't be ridiculous if we don't sign an Int DT.  We probably lose one of them if we put him on the PR (other teams do need Nat depth, not that they are starters), but there is always the IR for low $SMS "spare parts".

Teams roster the maximum number of imports. By definition that sets the usual level of Canadians on the roster whether they are starting or just back ups.

In theory you could roster 4 on the AR but that means you roster less depth elsewhere. That's not workable. You need depth on the OL, receiver, LB and secondary. A lot of those players will also play ST.

Keeping in mind we were running too many 3 man fronts with 1 DT. Unless we have more than 1 that could actually start, I think the limit is 3 but more probable we see 2 on the AR.

I don't like the idea of putting development players on the 1 game IR.  OTOH, if the SMS goes up I would support adding that 1 extra Canadian to the AR. It's a trade off of sorts. Either you increase the roster size, raise the min ELC or some combination of both. As I said, I'd support raising the ELC a bit. Technically it doesn't improve  retention or performance but is an equitable statement about inflation. $73K is not bad money for playing football for 6 months.

Just using " more " to pay the top players more doesn't improve development of new players. Being on the AR does.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on February 05, 2025, 04:35:32 PM
Still no official word about Dobson. I didn't expect him back but what's with the delay.

Also less activity about other potential free agents moving elsewhere. Some are re-signing with current teams but traffic has slowed after the early activity.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on February 05, 2025, 04:51:28 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on February 05, 2025, 03:57:42 PMKeeping 4 Nat DT's on the AR wouldn't be ridiculous if we don't sign an Int DT.  We probably lose one of them if we put him on the PR (other teams do need Nat depth, not that they are starters), but there is always the IR for low $SMS "spare parts".
does anyone else think that someone would claim Thomas or Smeckle on the pr? Its seldom done even for more valued players
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on February 05, 2025, 04:58:24 PM
Quote from: Pete on February 05, 2025, 04:51:28 PMdoes anyone else think that someone would claim Thomas or Smeckle on the pr? Its seldom done even for more valued players

Why would Thomas accept a PR spot at a reduced salary? He might get pushed to the 1 game IR with a fake injury.

Schmekel might accept a PR role and if a team got into ratio / depth issue he might be considered an option. Teams are picking up players released during the off season PR's to fill out TC rosters.

McGhee, Fayad, Karamoko, Murphy for example. It might involve a nominal trade but it does happen.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on February 05, 2025, 05:29:01 PM
Smeckle, sure.  Thomas wouldn't go onto it. 

Having a development player on the IR still means he can practice, it just prevents him from being scooped.  You can put him on the PR at the full Min AR salary, but that uses a spot for a discounted PR player.

Rostering a player on the AR and placing him on the IR > PR, if you need to pay him league min anyways.  PR spots are for $750/wk players (or whatever the minimum is now).

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 05, 2025, 05:49:22 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on February 05, 2025, 05:29:01 PMSmeckle, sure.  Thomas wouldn't go onto it. 

Having a development player on the IR still means he can practice, it just prevents him from being scooped.  You can put him on the PR at the full Min AR salary, but that uses a spot for a discounted PR player.

Rostering a player on the AR and placing him on the IR > PR, if you need to pay him league min anyways.  PR spots are for $750/wk players (or whatever the minimum is now).

I don't think Schmeck would accept a PR spot now either going into his 3rd season, his play improved a lot last year and expect him to play a more prominent role.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on February 05, 2025, 06:37:39 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 05, 2025, 05:49:22 PMI don't think Schmeck would accept a PR spot now either going into his 3rd season, his play improved a lot last year and expect him to play a more prominent role.
Quote from: theaardvark on February 05, 2025, 05:29:01 PMSmeckle, sure.  Thomas wouldn't go onto it. 

Having a development player on the IR still means he can practice, it just prevents him from being scooped.  You can put him on the PR at the full Min AR salary, but that uses a spot for a discounted PR player.

Rostering a player on the AR and placing him on the IR > PR, if you need to pay him league min anyways.  PR spots are for $750/wk players (or whatever the minimum is now).



I can't see Schmekel taking a spot on the PR. I think he has worked far to hard and would just move on.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 05, 2025, 06:53:07 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on February 05, 2025, 06:37:39 PMI can't see Schmekel taking a spot on the PR. I think he has worked far to hard and would just move on.

Half expected him to go home to Sask. this off-season, 3rd year player, not sure why he wasn't a FA.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blueforlife on February 05, 2025, 06:55:28 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 05, 2025, 06:53:07 PMHalf expected him to go home to Sask. this off-season, 3rd year player, not sure why he wasn't a FA.
I expect him to continue to be a good depth piece.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on February 05, 2025, 07:00:09 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 05, 2025, 06:53:07 PMHalf expected him to go home to Sask. this off-season, 3rd year player, not sure why he wasn't a FA.

The Bombers picked up his 3rd. year option.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on February 05, 2025, 07:48:01 PM
I think Hagerty is going to be a guy to watch in TC. 6'3", 200, and has very good speed. Will be good on Team, but he might be a guy that will step in at safety.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on February 05, 2025, 08:06:14 PM
Quote from: TBURGESS on February 05, 2025, 03:31:27 PMFixed it for you.

Accurate, but that's the safety net that Hammy isn't getting with Lawler.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on February 05, 2025, 08:32:38 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on February 05, 2025, 06:37:39 PMI can't see Schmekel taking a spot on the PR. I think he has worked far to hard and would just move on.

That's kind of the point or question. At what point does any team decide to go with the younger player to avoid this situation. Kornelson might accept a PR spot although he's attended the last 2 TC's. Samson was drafted 20th in 2024 and he's in the mix too.

However do we want 3 Canadian DT's on the AR out 5 competing? Even putting 2 on the PR is questionable use of the PR player limit.

We'll have 2 on the AR and possibly 3 in 2025. As I've mentioned 3 on the AR would be unusual and takes a roster spot from another position in theory.

So, is keeping Thomas really better than Schmekel, Korelson or Samson whether we keep 2 or 3 on the AR?

One alternative is to not have a 2nd global on the AR which might allow a 3rd DT. But that could just as easily be filled by a Canadian DB or receiver depth.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on February 05, 2025, 08:33:29 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on February 05, 2025, 07:48:01 PMI think Hagerty is going to be a guy to watch in TC. 6'3", 200, and has very good speed. Will be good on Team, but he might be a guy that will step in at safety.

He'll replace Noah Hallett IMO on ST's. Yes he could be a good depth player.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Ridermania on February 06, 2025, 01:26:46 AM
Miles Fox signs with the Tiger Cats.

https://3downnation.com/2025/02/05/hamilton-tiger-cats-agree-to-terms-with-dl-miles-fox-sources/
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on February 06, 2025, 04:05:55 AM
So, what I am hearing is that the Bombers will have a window between the communication window and start of FA to circle back and match or out bid Lawler's offer from Hamilton. I am wondering with this extra salary cap money if Walters takes another run at Lawler.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on February 06, 2025, 10:55:15 AM
If he wasn't worth x% of 5.6M, while is he worth x% of 6M?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on February 06, 2025, 11:25:16 AM
Quote from: Jesse on February 06, 2025, 10:55:15 AMIf he wasn't worth x% of 5.6M, while is he worth x% of 6M?

Except that because of how this was rolled out it's not a percentage increase shared evenly among the roster like you'd assume it would be. If every team has found 400,000, the only ones to really spend it on are free agents and those you can circle back on. Guys locked in are locked in.

You're right though, is it worth it? But if it's not, what else are we going to do with the money?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_or_die on February 06, 2025, 01:00:53 PM
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on February 06, 2025, 11:25:16 AMExcept that because of how this was rolled out it's not a percentage increase shared evenly among the roster like you'd assume it would be. If every team has found 400,000, the only ones to really spend it on are free agents and those you can circle back on. Guys locked in are locked in.

You're right though, is it worth it? But if it's not, what else are we going to do with the money?

Easy. Four free beers for all at the home opener.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on February 06, 2025, 03:47:59 PM
I don't think I want anyone who has agreed to a deal elsewhere to be bought back with extra $SMS.

They decided to leave for money, if they come back for money, they are mercenaries, not teammates.  Not the message to send in the locker room.

If you exceed your offer for one player, what are you saying to every other player?  This is  a lunch bucket locker room. Every player has an identified fair value, and is paid that, and those contracts are generally honoured. 

Before someone mentions it, I have no idea why they let Woli go, especially in light of this additional $SMS money.  $12k in bonus and a chance at making the team in camp would have been an easy spend.  If he lost his spot to Clercius in camp and got cut, I'm sure he signs elsewhere.  So I can't see this decision.  Unless Goviea told Walters that he'd take care of Woli, knowing the writing was on the wall for Clercius starting.  Would be a genius move by Goveia...
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on February 06, 2025, 04:41:49 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on February 06, 2025, 03:47:59 PMThey decided to leave for money, if they come back for money, they are mercenaries, not teammates.  Not the message to send in the locker room.

They are employees. The only reason they are here is money.

Only fans think this way.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 06, 2025, 04:47:31 PM
Quote from: Sir Blue and Gold on February 06, 2025, 11:25:16 AMExcept that because of how this was rolled out it's not a percentage increase shared evenly among the roster like you'd assume it would be. If every team has found 400,000, the only ones to really spend it on are free agents and those you can circle back on. Guys locked in are locked in.

You're right though, is it worth it? But if it's not, what else are we going to do with the money?

Don't know what Walters intends to do with it, but it probably won't change his perspective on what an individual FA is worth paying, especially since the cream of the crop has already been siphoned.  Could hang on to it for mid-late season adds and late NFL cuts, which the Bombers normally don't have any money left to pursue.  Conversely split it up evenly and give every player who makes the team after TC a little bump.  Excluding Zach of course.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Waffler on February 06, 2025, 04:58:47 PM
MOS loves Lawler. Colloras loves Lawler. I think there is a CHANCE, I would not be willing to guess the odds, but a chance that we match.

"I'd hope so," Collaros said. "That'd be a no-brainer to me."
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on February 06, 2025, 05:05:33 PM
Quote from: Waffler on February 06, 2025, 04:58:47 PMMOS loves Lawler. Colloras loves Lawler. I think there is a CHANCE, I would not be willing to guess the odds, but a chance that we match.

"I'd hope so," Collaros said. "That'd be a no-brainer to me."

And Lawler loves money. More than his former HC and QB, apparently.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on February 06, 2025, 05:08:59 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on February 06, 2025, 05:05:33 PMAnd Lawler loves money. More than his former HC and QB, apparently.

That said, who are we spending the money on?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on February 06, 2025, 05:19:28 PM
Quote from: Jesse on February 06, 2025, 05:08:59 PMThat said, who are we spending the money on?
My choice would be OL Mcewen or Couture (sask just signed Gagnon who may have been a good fit, and Ottawa signed Godber which gives them 7 nat oline men while we are down to 4 not including LS)
Cox would be a good choice on dl or Adeleke or Amos in dbs
BTW I agree Lawler talks a good game, but he's all about the money . He's always gone to whoever pays him in the top two receivers in the league. And based on the conversations reported we've heard its done as far as leaving
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on February 06, 2025, 05:28:24 PM
If it was up to me ( and it's not ). I would increase the ELC minimum by $2K. Most teams might add 12 or so rookies between imports and draft choices. It could be argued that even $5K increase is reasonable.

More money at the bottom won't bring better players to the CFL or retain them with a given team. It will be a step to take due to inflation. Obviously that impacts the higher paid players too but it's more significant at the bottom of the roster.

The 2nd thing I would do would be to add 1 more Canadian to roster, going back to when we had 46 on the AR. I'd probably argue adding 2 Canadians makes more sense for development. Adding 1 Canadian and 1 more import would be better IMO, but I'll stand with the pro ratio argument by agreeing to adding only Canadians.

If these kinds of steps aren't taken than when free agency hits again, we'll see more and more money going to top players due to more cash available. Teams will just try to outbid each other. That isn't really a win win situation.

Even though revenues are higher, some teams are probably still losing money. Regardless, in order to be competitive teams will spend their full SMS to the best of their ability.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pete on February 06, 2025, 05:33:13 PM
Quote from: Waffler on February 06, 2025, 04:58:47 PMMOS loves Lawler. Colloras loves Lawler. I think there is a CHANCE, I would not be willing to guess the odds, but a chance that we match.

"I'd hope so," Collaros said. "That'd be a no-brainer to me."
Maybe if Zac renegotiated his contract as 3/4 of the rest of the leagues qbs have done.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on February 06, 2025, 05:33:19 PM
Quote from: Jesse on February 06, 2025, 05:08:59 PMThat said, who are we spending the money on?

Good question. Whatever they decide they better do it soon. Free agents down to less than 120 and some new ones dropped off the list this morning.

I'd take a run at a Canadian OL. Regardless of what they think of Wallace, a veteran known talent is not a bad plan.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on February 06, 2025, 05:34:54 PM
I would use the increase in cap money to upgrade the interior of our DL,as well as get us a competent #2 Qb, as well, Couture would look good again in Blue and Gold and be an instant upgrade to our OL
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on February 06, 2025, 05:57:36 PM
Quote from: Waffler on February 06, 2025, 04:58:47 PMMOS loves Lawler. Colloras loves Lawler. I think there is a CHANCE, I would not be willing to guess the odds, but a chance that we match.

"I'd hope so," Collaros said. "That'd be a no-brainer to me."

There isn't a team that wouldn't want Lawler, which is why so many were in the mix.

But once we signed White, I'm thinking the Lawler window closed, even if we have the scratch to match.  And while we have 2 days to convince players who committed elsewhere, does that mean they can't get a new offer from the team they committed to?  Or do we have the last "take it or leave it" option?

Even if we have the option to make Lawler a last offer, after signed White, is there room?
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on February 06, 2025, 06:15:43 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on February 06, 2025, 05:57:36 PMThere isn't a team that wouldn't want Lawler, which is why so many were in the mix.

But once we signed White, I'm thinking the Lawler window closed, even if we have the scratch to match.  And while we have 2 days to convince players who committed elsewhere, does that mean they can't get a new offer from the team they committed to?  Or do we have the last "take it or leave it" option?

Even if we have the option to make Lawler a last offer, after signed White, is there room?

As someone who is pretty indifferent to signing Lawler or not, even I will say that White absolutely zero impact one way or the other. He's a dart throw.

Quote from: Blue In BC on February 06, 2025, 05:28:24 PMIf it was up to me ( and it's not ). I would increase the ELC minimum by $2K. Most teams might add 12 or so rookies between imports and draft choices. It could be argued that even $5K increase is reasonable.

More money at the bottom won't bring better players to the CFL or retain them with a given team. It will be a step to take due to inflation. Obviously that impacts the higher paid players too but it's more significant at the bottom of the roster.

The 2nd thing I would do would be to add 1 more Canadian to roster, going back to when we had 46 on the AR. I'd probably argue adding 2 Canadians makes more sense for development. Adding 1 Canadian and 1 more import would be better IMO, but I'll stand with the pro ratio argument by agreeing to adding only Canadians.

If these kinds of steps aren't taken than when free agency hits again, we'll see more and more money going to top players due to more cash available. Teams will just try to outbid each other. That isn't really a win win situation.

Even though revenues are higher, some teams are probably still losing money. Regardless, in order to be competitive teams will spend their full SMS to the best of their ability.

These are all CBA issues, I believe. Nothing can change there until it's up for negotiation again.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Blue In BC on February 06, 2025, 06:20:44 PM
Quote from: Jesse on February 06, 2025, 06:15:43 PMAs someone who is pretty indifferent to signing Lawler or not, even I will say that White absolutely zero impact one way or the other. He's a dart throw.

These are all CBA issues, I believe. Nothing can change there until it's up for negotiation again.

I know these are CBA issues but I can't imagine them having difficulty in increasing ELC level salaries. The intent of the annual increases and those from increased revenue was to be " for " the players.

There is nothing they would be asked to give back, so this is a 10 minute conversation and ammendment.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on February 06, 2025, 06:23:45 PM
I think with the Sterns signing, Bomber may circle back on Dobson. However Chungh is still an FA, that would be a instant upgrade to our OL.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 06, 2025, 06:56:20 PM
Quote from: dd on February 06, 2025, 05:34:54 PMI would use the increase in cap money to upgrade the interior of our DL,as well as get us a competent #2 Qb, as well, Couture would look good again in Blue and Gold and be an instant upgrade to our OL

Money could be well spent to upgrade the QB position (Dolegala) although there's not much left to choose from now, Shiltz, Cameron Dukes, Masoli, Shea Patterson.  If they would have signed MBT and been willing to use him strategically when needed, I have no doubt they'd get back to the GC this season.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on February 06, 2025, 07:08:45 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 06, 2025, 06:56:20 PMMoney could be well spent to upgrade the QB position (Dolegala) although there's not much left to choose from now, Shiltz, Cameron Dukes, Masoli, Shea Patterson.  If they would have signed MBT and been willing to use him strategically when needed, I have no doubt they'd get back to the GC this season.

I think Shiltz accepted an offer from Ottawa.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 06, 2025, 07:21:05 PM
Quote from: Pigskin on February 06, 2025, 07:08:45 PMI think Shiltz accepted an offer from Ottawa.

Don't think so, they re-signed Crum and still have Tyrie Adams in reserve.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TBURGESS on February 06, 2025, 07:51:04 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 06, 2025, 06:56:20 PMMoney could be well spent to upgrade the QB position (Dolegala) although there's not much left to choose from now, Shiltz, Cameron Dukes, Masoli, Shea Patterson.  If they would have signed MBT and been willing to use him strategically when needed, I have no doubt they'd get back to the GC this season.
I'd take Dukes out of that list. 
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_or_die on February 06, 2025, 08:41:02 PM
Quote from: TBURGESS on February 06, 2025, 07:51:04 PMI'd take Dukes out of that list.

Ditto.

I wouldn't mind Masoli either for all that experience for a backup role. Get a ring before he retires.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on February 06, 2025, 08:44:38 PM
Quote from: TBURGESS on February 06, 2025, 07:51:04 PMI'd take Dukes out of that list.

Hands down the best option on that list.

Quote from: blue_or_die on February 06, 2025, 08:41:02 PMDitto.

I wouldn't mind Masoli either for all that experience for a backup role. Get a ring before he retires.

Is he healthy enough, though? I have to think his mobility is shot.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on February 06, 2025, 08:49:32 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 06, 2025, 07:21:05 PMDon't think so, they re-signed Crum and still have Tyrie Adams in reserve.

Dan Ralph from the Canadian Press reporting that Shiltz has a agreed to join Ottawa as there fourth QB going into camp.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_or_die on February 06, 2025, 08:50:28 PM
Quote from: blue_gold_84 on February 06, 2025, 08:44:38 PMHands down the best option on that list.

Is he healthy enough, though? I have to think his mobility is shot.

I thought I heard he was good to go but if that's not correct then no, I wouldn't want anyone still recovering from an injury as our insurance policy. Maybe tie a physical to any sort of offer.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on February 06, 2025, 08:54:03 PM
I would also like to see Dukes here.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 06, 2025, 09:04:38 PM
Quote from: blue_or_die on February 06, 2025, 08:50:28 PMI thought I heard he was good to go but if that's not correct then no, I wouldn't want anyone still recovering from an injury as our insurance policy. Maybe tie a physical to any sort of offer.

Masoli played some last season and from what I recall he didn't really do anything well, thought he would demonstrate an ability to move the ball but he looked very mediocre. From Ottawa's perspective they gave him all the time he needed to recover but they don't have a use for him moving forward.

I'd also bring in Dukes and let him battle Wilson for the future QB job, I think either could be the short yardage QB and would rather keep both over Dolegala. 
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: theaardvark on February 06, 2025, 09:06:59 PM
I don't think Dukes, or Patterson, or Masoli is going to be the answer here.

Wilson gets his shot to show he's got what the management team sees in him, and there will be new arms in camp.

There are going to be some unsigned CFL experienced QB's available through the season if injuries happen.  Might even be able to trade for one if need be.  I don't think we need to roster a "just in case" almost good enough QB for the year.  Unless he's OK with a PR spot because he just wants to play ball.

I haven't seen word on how Streveler is recovering yet... I think most people will say that ship has sailed, but it would be interesting to see him under Jackson...
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 06, 2025, 09:17:01 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on February 06, 2025, 09:06:59 PMI don't think Dukes, or Patterson, or Masoli is going to be the answer here.

Wilson gets his shot to show he's got what the management team sees in him, and there will be new arms in camp.

There are going to be some unsigned CFL experienced QB's available through the season if injuries happen.  Might even be able to trade for one if need be.  I don't think we need to roster a "just in case" almost good enough QB for the year.  Unless he's OK with a PR spot because he just wants to play ball.

I haven't seen word on how Streveler is recovering yet... I think most people will say that ship has sailed, but it would be interesting to see him under Jackson...

It wouldn't surprise me if they gave Strev. another shot just based on loyalty, he can be the unofficial party captain heading into the home Grey Cup.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Sir Blue and Gold on February 06, 2025, 09:22:05 PM
I still like Dolegala from a developmental standpoint. He put up fairly good numbers on a shaky Riders offense in year one. Now he's had time some time to learn in a few different places.

That's kind of the ideal developmental path if you ask me. I'm glad we have him and I think he's going in this year if Collaros misses time.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: peg_city on February 06, 2025, 09:51:04 PM
Problem with Delegala is he a pocket passer and you need a really good Oline for him to be functional.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: GOLDMEMBER on February 06, 2025, 10:48:30 PM
I would love to see Dukes here. Masoli not so much.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on February 06, 2025, 11:02:46 PM
I'd like to see us bring in either Patterson or Dukes, someone who's young and mobile. Dukes sorta fell out of favour in Toronto, and they just signed Arbuckle, so maybe....
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: TBURGESS on February 06, 2025, 11:03:45 PM
Kicking the tires on Masoli would probably put him on the IR. No interest at all from me. 
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_or_die on February 07, 2025, 12:06:50 AM
Quote from: theaardvark on February 06, 2025, 09:06:59 PMI don't think Dukes, or Patterson, or Masoli is going to be the answer here.

Wilson gets his shot to show he's got what the management team sees in him, and there will be new arms in camp.

There are going to be some unsigned CFL experienced QB's available through the season if injuries happen.  Might even be able to trade for one if need be.  I don't think we need to roster a "just in case" almost good enough QB for the year.  Unless he's OK with a PR spot because he just wants to play ball.

I haven't seen word on how Streveler is recovering yet... I think most people will say that ship has sailed, but it would be interesting to see him under Jackson...

This is absolutely the year of all years where we need exactly this. Unless of course we can sign another starter for backup pay (which is why I was suggesting Masoli potentially being of interest).
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: J5V on February 07, 2025, 12:39:44 AM
Quote from: Pigskin on February 06, 2025, 04:05:55 AMSo, what I am hearing is that the Bombers will have a window between the communication window and start of FA to circle back and match or out bid Lawler's offer from Hamilton. I am wondering with this extra salary cap money if Walters takes another run at Lawler.
That's very interesting. What a unique method of negotiation for both Walters and Lawler. If Kyle has the money and can lock up a blue chip receiver like Lawler I don't see why he wouldn't match the Ticats bid. Well, then again, I suppose if Kyle figures he has the next Lawler locked up for less already he might hold off but that's a wild thought.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: dd on February 07, 2025, 02:25:22 AM
Quote from: blue_or_die on February 07, 2025, 12:06:50 AMThis is absolutely the year of all years where we need exactly this. Unless of course we can sign another starter for backup pay (which is why I was suggesting Masoli potentially being of interest).
Exactly. Didn't we learn our lesson in the Grey Cup?? We need a bonafide, can run the offense decent #2 Qb who can come in and win us game, just like Arbuckle did for the Argos. We need that.... especially this year at home....with an aging Collaros who may retire after this season...forget chasing Lawler, get a #2 Qb, get an OL to replace Dobson, or heck, match the offer Hammy gave to him and get him back, but going on with Wilson is going to get his shot at #2 is not a good plan. You could see the minute Alexander got in the game for Montreal he had what it takes to maybe be a #1, I didn't get that seeing Wilson stumble and fumble around, he looked lost, and Alexander had zero reps coming into the first game he played in and delivered.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Pigskin on February 07, 2025, 05:01:34 AM
Haba: 10 Games, 6 DTs, 1 Sack.  Gone.
Garbutt: 12 Games, 19 DTs, 3 Sacks. Gone.
Fox: 3 Games, 3 DTs. Gone.

Woods: 17 Games, 20 DTs, 2 Sacks.
Adams: 14 Games, 16 DTs, 4 Sacks.

Would have like to have kept Garbutt. But, he probably price himself out of Winnipeg.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Jesse on February 07, 2025, 10:44:54 AM
Quote from: Pigskin on February 07, 2025, 05:01:34 AMHaba: 10 Games, 6 DTs, 1 Sack.  Gone.
Garbutt: 12 Games, 19 DTs, 3 Sacks. Gone.
Fox: 3 Games, 3 DTs. Gone.

Woods: 17 Games, 20 DTs, 2 Sacks.
Adams: 14 Games, 16 DTs, 4 Sacks.

Would have like to have kept Garbutt. But, he probably price himself out of Winnipeg.

Don't think any of those three priced themselves out of Winnipeg.

Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: blue_gold_84 on February 07, 2025, 01:32:55 PM
Quote from: theaardvark on February 06, 2025, 09:06:59 PMI don't think Dukes is going to be the answer here.

He's not even 27 yet. He's shown flashes and certainly has the potential if he continues to develop.

Who better than Collaros to help him in that.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: Stats Junkie on February 08, 2025, 06:37:07 PM
Quote from: Throw Long Bannatyne on February 03, 2025, 10:08:02 PMWhy does this make you mad? Like them or not 3DN is the only media covering the CFL like a blanket.
You are correct in that 3DN has established itself as the outlet with the most comprehensive CFL coverage - cfl.ca is doing a pretty solid job this off season.

I guess, my biggest issue is that they get far too much credit for breaking news. The majority of what they post has already been posted by someone else, including local media, usually via other social media sites. They also get credit for news releases by the various CFL teams or the CFL itself.

I like to see the credit for news go to the person/team/outlet responsible for the story. I would also like to see 3DN do a better job of crediting the original source. If this site allowed us to embed posts from other social media we might see more credit go to the proper sources.
Title: Re: Bomber Free Agents
Post by: KINGCHARLES on February 11, 2025, 03:05:32 PM
Quote from: dd on February 06, 2025, 11:02:46 PMI'd like to see us bring in either Patterson or Dukes, someone who's young and mobile. Dukes sorta fell out of favour in Toronto, and they just signed Arbuckle, so maybe....

Patterson is trash, I'm saying that as a Michigan fan... he's like a crappy discount dollar store version of Jake Maier. His specialty is 1-4 yard passes and struggles to throw the deep ball. He's suited more for a league that has 4-5 downs. Streveler and Wilson are better options than Patterson